The U.S. economy is headed into a period of noticeably slower growth thanks to the tariff impact on inflation and, by consequence, consumer spending, according to Goldman Sachs
Profitez des vidéos et de la musique que vous aimez, mettez en ligne des contenus originaux, et partagez-les avec vos amis, vos proches et le monde entier.
Profitez des vidéos et de la musique que vous aimez, mettez en ligne des contenus originaux, et partagez-les avec vos amis, vos proches et le monde entier.
and if you notice, you will rarely see them actually be able (or willing) to change things significantly for the better. crumbs here and there, at best. usually just big nothing burgers. reality checks out as almost literally just glowing descriptions of hopeful could-have-beens.
Exactly, they act as a pressure relief valve for the system ensuring that public anger doesn't boil over into meaningful action that threatens the ruling class in any way.
Even people who've been at it for years. I am skeptical of the AI hype bubble as much as anyone here, but it's been very useful for fixing things in Linux. Just in the past years it helped me (among others):
Find an obscure bug that was reported that same day in the kernel, and helped me switch to the LTS kernel to prevent these issues.
Help me setup up a random 35mm film scanner that I found with cups, and then help me set up a win XP VM when that didn't work out
Help me fix bluray playback yesterday after VLC suddenly randomly started to refuse playing it.
I doubt anyone here hates AI other than for the big companies pushing it constantly. ML and language models have been a thing since the last decade but we only hate them now cause of how desperate the corpos are about it and oh the data scraping too but that's expected.
For me it helped with: - Fixing electron apps not launching in wayland - Fixed my ignis shell code(ricing, these shells keep changing and it's a burden maintaining them) - automating my system with a few systemd timers.
Albeit I could do these myself by looking at docs but it's not worth the time. Now it just works instead of "maintaining my arch setup".
I'm in my 50s, I've been in IT professionally for 30 years, using Linux for 25 of those.
I hate AI.
I don't hate the technology, but I hate the culture of "ez learning" and the marketing. Literally people who have no clue about technology openly saying "wanna bet?" when I say it doesn't always have the right answers.
Sure, 19 of 20 chatgpt answers are great, but that 20th answer is dangerously wrong. Like, wreck your infrastructure wrong.
I also hate what it's doing to young minds the most, though: the 20 something techs I hire will lean on AI so hard, they have no sense of what to do if the answer isn't forthcoming, just ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
AI is killing problem-solving.
Edit: I'm distinguishing AI from ML here, which I do use as a pattern recognition tool.
Yes, exactly. Its killing problem solving ability and learning. Taking the extra time to search around and figure things out helps you learn. Not to mention its poisoning its own well, making legitimate answers harder and harder to find on the web.
This is some boomer-tier gatekeeping and just another "back in my day, things were better because..."
The people who aren't problem solving beyond typing something into a chat bot are the same people who wouldn't have done so before the chat bot existed.
You can absolutely find similar complaints about the internet being invented, or search engines, or any other technological expansion in the past entire human history.
Agreed, you absolutely can find similar complaints about search engines, and there were similar fools back then who relied wholesale on search results and nothing further.
I'm looking for people who can problem-solve, not just click-click-next use tools. When search engines made life easier, the folks who didn't try anything past searching google just didn't advance in tech fields if they couldn't get it done. The people I'm talking about now are walking into jobs that require thinking while literally proclaiming that they let something else do the thinking for them.
What am I supposed to do with a tech who can't get past an ansible deployment because he couldn't figure out how to find and use the ansible wiki? As I plainly said, it's not the technology, it's the culture.
Your "boomer" take on this isn't valid because I'm also getting the AI-bro talk from idiots my age as well.
Last, I'd like to point out that you don't know what gatekeeping means. Maybe chatgpt can help you.
Barring terrible company policy, those people who can't do more than allow the AI to think for them will find themselves out of a job pretty quickly if they can't do the work themselves.
Bad employees and stupid people will always be stupid, the newest tech isn't the cause of that. Maybe it lowers the bar of entry a bit?
Lastly, you're clearly gatekeeping "the ability to critically think" based on some arbitrary conditions you made up based on "how things used to be", so to speak. Maybe you could have used your superior boomer wisdom to figure that one out.
I completely agree. In the current context it's important to note that I have a cs degree and you too probably and way better than me. But some people don't know how to use computers and that's fine. They just like to surf or play games. I think when you are troubleshooting your pc, it's fine. That's my position.
What you are saying I think is completely different discussion. I know people that you are referring to and you cannot change them. Some people love ignorance but yeah I agree it's impacting a lot of people but I don't think it's a ai issue, it's a people issue.
I felt the same way regarding AI. I always felt like it was too unreliable, and while you obviously shouldn't trust it blindly, it has been doing a pretty good job explaining things to me. I've been using a local model with ollama, i think it's called qwen2.5 coder or something, and it has been helpfull explaining some NixOS stuff to me, where i couldn't find it myself (cause NixOS documentation is all over the place). I also use it for explaining some bash stuff to me sometimes when i'm writing a script. Usually i don't just care about the answer but i also want to learn why something works if it isn't clear to me, and so far it also has done a good job explaining how it works when i ask it a follow up question.
It's a great tool for the right tasks. What's annoying is that it's marketed as being a great tool for tasks it can barely do.
It has really sped up the process of writing things in languages I'm unfamiliar with. All the stupid little mistakes it will find much faster than trying to google them. As long as you're critical of the answers I also found it pretty good at explaining how to do things. It will often get some details wrong but as long as you have general programming ability and access to documentation you can usually figure those out somewhat easily.
Indeed, it helped me a lot when I didn't know when to start. Searching on the web can yield very old results, and you simply don't know what is outdated and what's not.
I've been holding off on upgrading my work computer to W11 for as long as I can. It's already slow as shit with all the MS bloat (along with another required spyware program we have installed for one of our vendors), I can only imagine 11 will make that much worse.
Alto e cupo, superbo a vedersi, sorge lungo il fiume Hudson come un OOPArt (artefatto misterioso) fuoriuscito da un portale verso l’epoca dei laird sui loro scranni di quercia e delle scintillanti spade che si accompagnavano alle cornamuse degli Alti…
The proposed update to Switzerland’s Ordinance on the Surveillance of Postal and Telecommunications Traffic (VÜPF: Verordnung über die Überwachung des Post- und Fernmeldeverkehrs) represents a significant expansion of state surveillance powers, worse than the surveillance powers of the USA. If enacted, it would have serious consequences for encrypted services such as Threema, an encrypted WhatsApp alternative and Proton Mail as well as VPN providers based in Switzerland.
So. Switzerland doesn't really have fully direct democracy in the necessary sense. It's still an old nation-state with laws made in the olden day when you had to compromise. There are many cases where the "direct" part is optional and requires interested people to assemble signatures yadda-yadda. Not good enough to counter a campaign for legal change with a goal. That aside, its system encourages it to have politicians as a thing. Which means that for some issues it will always drift shitward.
It also has separation of 3 kinds of government by degree of locality, but not separation of the "an entity ensuring food safety can't regulate telecommunications" or "an entity regulating police labor safety can't regulate riot police acceptable action" kinds.
(Which is why I usually refer to my preference for a kind of "direct democracy" as a revised one-level Soviet system with mandatory rotation, plenty of places and sortition to state worker roles, despite that not having very good connotations.)
Democracy is an infant still learning to walk. You plug the holes and add new institutions for oversight. You don't shoot the damn baby and start over because you know how you'd force everyone to do it.
And this argument has been used for every political system in history. Even in USSR in materials approved by censors it was normal to joke about it.
You plug the holes and add new institutions for oversight.
Why don't you do that with real-life mechanisms? A moving part of a machine has corroded enough to have a hole unintended by design. Go on, plug it. Oh, it's better to replace the part.
That aside, I think you've missed my specific arguments, not providing any of your own. Those things about participation as wide as possible and rotation. This means that there should be as many political roles as possible (of a delegate or of a secretary or of anyone), often rotated, with the same person not being able to hold the same or similar post for longer than N months, and with sortition based on some pseudo-random mechanism (pseudo-random to be able to check the results for fraud). To reduce the power of any single delegate or bureaucrat and to make lobbying, bribing and blackmailing them harder. To simultaneously make the population more politically literate - by almost every citizen, ideally, participating in some kind of daily decision-making work. Not voting once a year (at best) from among choices given to them by someone else.
That's what con artists do - provide the victim with an illusion of choice.
You don’t shoot the damn baby and start over because you know how you’d force everyone to do it.
That's exactly what you do. One consistent system does one thing by design. Another consistent system does another thing by design. Something in-between organically evolved does neither. Evolution is the survival of the fittest - fittest for survival. So an organically evolved system is approximating the optimum of power. The status quo.
What it does not approximate over time is any idea of public good. That would be nuts - so, metaphorically, you've built a wooden bridge, do you think it'll become more or less reliable over time under snow and rain and sun? Is a 100 years old bridge better than a bridge just built and tested?
And the optimum of power is formed by the existing system among other things.
Which means that it becomes more and more static and degenerate.
This is not law yet. The Federal Council (the executive) has started a consultation process at the beginning of the year which ended in May. They are now looking at all the feedback that came in, that was - unsurprisingly - exclusively negative from all sides. If the responsible minister wants to go ahead with it, it goes to the Federal Council for a vote. If they approve it, this would be a decree to change an existing decree and that would come into effect next year or the year after.
And this is where direct democracy comes in: If this is the case anyone can start getting signatures for a public initiative which would change the constitution to prohibit such practices. In fact anyone can start doing that now. If it succeeds, then it'll come to a popular vote. Threema (a secure chat provider) has already announced that they would do that and I'm sure that they wouldn't be the only ones to band together in this.
The process might take long, but this is in no way "not good enough to counter a campaign for legal change with a goal" and in fact has happened multiple times in the past. Hence why Switzerland has a direct vote on issues every few months because of something called "Referendum", whereby a popular vote can be forced on an issue passing through parliament. I might have my criticisms of the political system, but this ain't it.
its system encourages it to have politicians as a thing
Well yes, there is some level of representation, so over 8 million people don't have to decide every little detail on 1000s of changes of law. The system is built upon a "milita" system. I.e. politicians usually have a job. So people have the possibility to vote in experts or their vicinity and know that they won't solely be career politicians. Unfortunately the laws around financing and propaganda are rather lax, giving an advantage to the rich, which leads to an over-representation of the capitalist class with occupations such as lawyers and business-owners and a clear under-representation of classical working-class jobs such as craftspeople or office workers. This is amendable though to correct the mismatch, if people realize their class interest and don't fall for the same right-wing propaganda of a party whose playbook has been inspired by the US GOP for decades and who is inspiring Germany's AfD now.
The main downside of the system imo has to do with people with no knowledge on an issue having to weigh in on them and therefore how powerful propaganda campaigns can be, which means that money buys power, as in every other existing so-called democracy - direct or not. Especially with how money shifts power away from the populace, this is inherent to capitalistic systems and it would be on the populace to protect itself from it. With enough propaganda though, people keep voting for more power of capital unbeknownst to them or not, just as they might vote against their interests on other things. The fact that you have to convince so many people, who hopefully do have some degree of education, makes it a lot harder though, for big capitalists to reach their goals, compared to less direct systems. And I know of several examples, how such a vote did not go in favor of big capital. What usually makes the difference is whether they succeed in portraying their advantage as the advantage of all.
Yeah, so the difference in what I'd like from what you describe as existing is:
The representation should be spread thinner over the population, and with separate organs voting on separate kinds of matters. Ideally so that most of the population would have some short experience in participating in at least one of those organs by reaching the age of 30. Experience is needed to make your last paragraph less problematic, and wide participation - to gain that experience first-hand and also to make it very expensive to blackmail\bribe\threaten enough people. This might also make a referendum an event a bit more rare, because it won't come to that.
In general it's very cool that such a system even exists as a proof that nothing is impractical about it.
There do exist things resembling that a bit. Usually done on the local level and mostly concerning some street/development design, where people are invited to actively participate in a workshop style event with experts and vote on the results. But yes, these are not mandates. And as soon as you go onto the state or federal level, such structures become virtually non-existent.
The others are parliamentary commissions which can be instated by parliament and are formed of mainly external experts around a certain issue. These are often used on state and federal levels of government.
I would love if representation was spread wider over the population and that involvement was higher. I also am baffled at how bad general civics education is here in school, especially at the obligatory level. I would welcome a far more detailed and engaging civics education where they could already get some experience right at the school. Or go and participate at some local event. This way they also see the importance of a truly democratic process. Alas, as long as they can't vote, nobody seems to want their opinions.
Another part that needs addressing is finances. There's a lot of intransparency yes, but the way it works now, it is also very hard to get your message across without being big in a main political party or having some big private sponsor. Which limits your actual freedom before and after you're elected. If we're thinking radical we might severely limit campaign budgets or think about public funds allowing the same restrictive scope for everyone, no matter their background and finances. This would also limit the imbalance in outreach between capital-backed candidates and others.
A third huge problem lies within the judiciary, where judges on many levels effectively also have to be party-associated to get elected. If that sounds completely compromising their necessary impartiality, yeah, it's because it does. (Although I don't have data on how that influences their work)
And lastly: The structures of accountability for politicians. I know that some steadiness or stability is necessary, but without the fear of accountability, far too many misuse their positions without repercussions. As we see from around the world, this invites more and more brazen figures to do more and more brazen violations. Just a brain-fart: 100k signatures to force a vote on relieving someone of their immunity so they can be tried in court. And to not just wait it out. Right now, it's parliament that has this exclusive possibility.
So. Switzerland doesn't really have fully direct democracy in the necessary sense.
Yes, it's half-direct, who said otherwise? Fully direct on a Nation state level would maybe be possible now with the Internet. But we can still overrule them, while germans get tired of their politicians lying on elections and doing what they want. Doesn't mean they don't try here.
But yeah, this system has it's weaknesses with complicated or emotional topics. But then again, we are all humans.
Fully direct on a Nation state level would maybe be possible now with the Internet.
That's my point. It might seem dangerous to rely on the Internet for such basic matters, but it's already being used to great effect to undermine all democracies. So there's no choice, it's like an arms race. (Still, probably for elections it'd make sense to have a countrywide parallel intranet, so that someone's error in setting up a BGP router wouldn't disrupt it.).
But yeah, this system has it’s weaknesses with complicated or emotional topics. But then again, we are all humans.
That's the other side of the problem - modern easiness of propaganda.
OK, I live in Russia, just rather sad to see how many other countries are slowly drifting in the same regrettable unsavory direction.
None. I'm using "compromise" here in the sense of compromising between democracy and elites, with the world order normal 200 years ago. Today those compromises don't work because of technological progress and different makeup of societies.
Strong means attractive. Not getting pummeled in WWII and making some profits, being complicit in some crimes (turning back Jews), and in general being on top for many decades make you look strong.
I meant current times, not in the past. Sorry, I assumed that would be obvious. There are also some things I like about Germany, though they have a pretty terrible past.
The Nazi gold is still very much a thing. And the descendants of Jewish people who died in concentration camps are often unsuccessful in reclaiming any wealth that was stored in Swiss banks, because they don't have death certificates and what not. Switzerland is incredibly stubborn and selfish when it comes to anything that would tarnish their neutral stance in banking and politics.
Nazi gold didn't disappear after the Nazis fell. They still pocketed it all, despite knowing where all that wealth came from, and did fuck all to help rebuild Europe.
Other things like their appeasing attitude towards Russia, reluctance to allow weapons exports to Ukraine, and willingness to export weapons to awful regimes are all unambiguously current.
Yeah, the whole "private banking" history thing the EFF seems to lionize in the article was 100% just for serving lucrative international robber barrons and other criminals. It was never about protecting regular citizens privacy.
My theory is that if you're cute you're socially protected and the same applies to states and countries. Switzerland is quite the nice place and there are cultural hubs of historical importance, so it has the cute look now doesn't it.
Hold up now! I'll have you know in some parts of the country women couldn't vote until the 90s! Also unmarried cohabitation was illegal in some cantons until the 80s and paternity leave as a concept only exists in Switzerland since the 00s.
You’re right it doesn’t dive into encryption however, given that the data is still accessible a government agency can surely decrypt it if they truly wanted to, even if it take them years.
a government agency can surely decrypt it if they truly wanted to
They can't. Not using any known technology. Even basic encryption like AES256 would take 10^50 years on a supercomputer. That's not even getting into quantum-resistant encryption.
america is the only country that is except from Swiss banking privacy laws. they strong armed us with something (still dunno until today what exactly) to have it removed for american citizens.
I know this and i know that political systems in Switzerland are really unique. I think this kind of thing can pass despite the robust involvement of the civil society, mostly because it's an update on a preexisting law. But this is something I can't tell as of now.
Considering that we might have a World War III or 2nd American Civil War in a decade or two, it would be foolish of Switzerland to not permit encrypted VPN. A stable neutrality is very profitable in a world of uncertainty.
Isnt Switzerland the country that struggled with their covid response because of the direct democracy requirements lacking provisions for such changes...amazing they can figure everything out to hurt the public.
I visited Switzerland just after the vaccines dropped. The Swiss COVID response far surpassed the response in the United States. They rolled out a nation-wide app for vaccination attestation, and any museum, restaurant, etc. could scan a QR code on someone's phone with a phone. But do they have a scary, socially reactionary subset of their population? Yes.
In some harmful ways they are fanatically culturally conservative. But they also care about community, sustainability, health, the well-being of children, environmental preservation, organization, and self-reliance. Being a small, rich, homogeneous, topographically-isolated country drives these characteristics.
Surveillance State developments are depressing but not surprising.
what covid response? our government simply played on "eigenverantwortung" (personal responsibility). in a country with one of the highest education levels it wasn't difficult to keep a distance of 2 meters during the peak of the pandemic unless you're surrounding yourself with naive people. I was able to go swimming in the lake in the summer, and skiing in the winter while Italy, France and Austria had this banned. weird to think about it but I honestly had a pretty fun time during covid and made some of the best friends to date during it. hell, we even had music festivals and our numbers were not horrible. I think you're thinking of Sweden. happens a lot.
Powers that would make the US blush!? Give me a fucking break. The US spies on all communication in the entire world.
Proton is a joke and their CEO is an obvious fascist. It was stupid to think a corporation is the answer to privacy anyways. They obey all countries rules and turn over your information the moment they are asked by governments.
The future of privacy in Switzerland is in the hands of the citizens. Let's hope they make the right decisions and encourage them to do so.
If these corporations really cared about privacy they would be promoting laws to make it enshrined in our constitutions. The reality is privacy is just another way to market to the masses who don't know better.
My cynical side says these "privacy" focused corporations not wanting privacy to be enshrined in law is because then every business would be privacy minded and their marketing advantage would quickly disappear.
they've been threatening this for year to keep suckling at the tit of governmental subsidies to make Switzerland look more attractive for investors with them being here. I doubt they'll follow through.
I self host mine. Honestly I just self host as much as I can to avoid stuff like this because while many European companies are great you just never know. I was with Tuta but decided to self host, same for when I was using Filen for backups. Hell I'm even self hosting my git repos and search engine now.
@poutinewharf commented a screenshot of Proton's post, but the headline was about their AI chatbot, and the news about the Swiss move is buried at the end.
Because of legal uncertainty around Swiss government proposals(new window) to introduce mass surveillance — proposals that have been outlawed in the EU — Proton is moving most of its physical infrastructure out of Switzerland. Lumo will be the first product to move.
switzerland was never a utopia for anybody except corporations, billionaires, and nazis. their "neutrality" was nothing more than an excuse for unregulated capitalism.
Switzerland never had solid privacy laws - and is known for intelligence service overreach for decades.
They had a Stasi like system of "who to imprison" when "the time comes".
They listen to all IP traffic in and out the country - which is concerning in times of traffic pattern analysis. And they are known for their close cooperation with US intelligence services.
Protons (and Threemas) claim of "soo good swiss privacy laws" is nothing more than swiss-washing. And they know it.
Proton has already given away data of its customers (climate activists) to the swiss authorities. And only talked about it when the press got onto it.
Buried in Proton's AI announcement today is a pretty shocking detail about their service 👀
Because of legal uncertainty around Swiss government proposals to introduce mass surveillance — proposals that have been outlawed in the EU — Proton is moving most of its physical infrastructure out of Switzerland. Lumo will be the first product to move.
Saw this posted over on HackerNews, and loved it. I'm big on self-hosting, and this is an incredibly exciting idea to me.
The Promised LAN is a closed, membership only network of friends that operate a 24/7 always-on LAN party, running since 2021. The vast majority of documentation is maintained on the LAN, but this website serves to give interested folks, prospective members or friends an idea of what the Promised LAN is, and how it works.
Their manifesto is also worth reading. My personal favorite part:
We do not wish to, nor will we, rebuild the internet. We do not wish to, nor will we, scale this. We will never be friends with enough people, as hard as we may try. Participation hinges on us all having fun. As a result, membership will never be open, and we will never have enough connected LANs to deal with the technical and social problems that start to happen with scale. This is a feature, not a bug.
This is a call for you to do the same. Build your own LAN. Connect it with friends’ homes. Remember what is missing from your life, and fill it in. Use software you know how to operate and get it running. Build slowly. Build your community. Do it with joy. Remember how we got here. Rebuild a community space that doesn’t need to be mediated by faceless corporations and ad revenue. Build something sustainable that brings you joy. Rebuild something you use daily.
Except there are artists available at all price ranges. Usually with the expensive ones you're paying for experience and/or prestige. There are less experienced/prestigious artists that will gladly take your $60 commission.
Also, art isn't a necessity. It is a luxury and by definition always will be, especially custom art commissioned by you. The stance of the people behind AI art is founded on the notion that you need art so it can benefit from automation in the same way food does. But you don't need art. It's the capstone of Maslow's pyramid. If you're at a level of privilege where art starts seeming like a necessity, you can afford $260 for it.
I'm not even strictly anti AI art. But I absolutely hate the argument that AI makes art more "accessible" or "affordable" (it was accessible/affordable before, you were just too lazy to find artists at your price range) or "reduces the barrier to entry of becoming an artist" (by which they mean you don't actually have to learn how to make art to make it, as if that's a good thing).
I especially hate the animosity AI artists and AI art enjoyers have toward actual artists. Portraying them as pretentious, profit driven, judgmental, etc.
Your phone too, your PC/laptop too, your car too, your meat too, your air-travel too....who cares? Banishing "AI" won't cure this planet. It would just slightly delay the inevitable.
It's just the usual, easy hate for things I don't need/like.
spamming this cringe bullshit across a bunch of different instances doesn't make you any less of a permavirgin slop fiend who loves to be cucked by corporations
My brother, I am someone who is pretty pro-AI art, for reasons too complex to get into, but which basically have to do with latent possibility spaces and the boundary between discovery or creation.
I am typically pissed off and annoyed when people get their pitchforks out at any mention of AI art. I also consider myself a pretty decent amateur artist. I draw, I paint, I 3D model. I also like working with the more core technologies of AI. I have a horse in both races, so to speak.
But this post, this post makes me feel like one of those pitchfork-wielders that typically annoy me. Why? Because you've depicted the artist as a rude snob who looks down on poor people, and is thereby getting their just deserts and having their smugness deflated now that they're no longer needed. This is such a wildly inaccurate perception of artists. 9999/10000 artists make probably less than $40,000/yr in the U.S. Most of them could make more money doing something else, but they don't, because they love art. They aren't looking down on poor people, they are poor people.
And no, $60 really isn't enough. Nobody is getting paid enough these days. Do you have any skills or crafts that took you 4 years of work to become even barely good enough at that someone would even consider hiring you? And if so, how would you like it if someone asked you to work for days at a rate below minimum wage? Don't people deserve to have not just subsistence lives, but nice happy lives in return for creating something nice and happy for you?
No artist is sneering at your low commission offer on account of you being poor. The sneering is that, you can spend $60 on something that you don't need whatsoever, whereas they likely need your $60 to buy something like food. These are people who live ENTIRELY off what people pay them for their work, no wage, no tip, etc. How could you ever look down on them for wanting to have a nice life, while at the same time wanting what they provide? It's fine if you're not willing to pay $260 for their work, but it's not fine to look down on them for it, and it's nonsense to characterize them as a judgemental snob. Unless you're trying to commission Jeff Koons or something, any artist you talk to is struggling to get by just like everyone else. You aren't "serving them right" or "teaching them a lesson" by going to AI instead. You're just making it harder for them to make a living doing what they love, and regardless of whether AI does it better than them, or another artist is willing to live a shittier life for that and therefore charge a lower price, that's nothing to be proud of.
I don't want to be mean or make you feel bad, though, I just want you to stop and think about what it must feel like to be a poor artist and see something like this. No doubt they're suffering extra competition as a result of AI, but should we revel in that? If in my small town, I have a neighbor who makes a decent living by charging $20/ticket to his guitar concerts, and then one day another guy moves in, who plays way better my neighbor, and only charges $10/ticket...such that eventually my neighbor can't afford to make a living playing his music any more and picks up a job he hates instead...That's just a shitty situation. And I'm not going to go as far as many others do and say you're bad for buying the $10 tickets from the new guy. I get it, you're struggling too, we all are. You want some joy for the lowest price you can get it, and if it's better, why not? But that doesn't mean we need to turn our noses up at our neighbor and deem his shows "overpriced" - especially if he's already living on less money than his patrons to begin with.
Nooooo, you don't get it. The poor artists are smug meanies so we are allowed to steal from them. If the poor artist just accepted the massive low ball offer than everyone would be happy and we'd have world peace probably.
Ugh yes these artists, so mean, so evil, greedy and disgusting, they don't deserve being paid not even a tenth of the minimum wage. 60 bucks isn't enough to cover that 12 hr job you say? Where do you live???
Not like I'm gonna make art for anybody else anyway. Do I look like a fucking party clown? I'll take your ideas, they're gonna suck, and maybe if it's impressive I'll write a note I never look at again.
If you offer somone 60$, and they deny it and say they can only do it for 260 it's because they already have someone willing to pay 250, and they can only make 1 piece at a time. Why would they turn down a 250$ piece to make your 60$ piece? It's simple scarcity. You aren't entitled to someones labor for any price. I really don't care if you use AI to make what you want. The only thing about AI that annoys me is that it's everywhere now, and it looks bad a lot of the time. But just understand that your post here just makes you look entitled. That's why your being mass downvoted. I suggest you do some introspection, and try to see things from other peoples perspectives.
spamming this cringe bullshit across a bunch of different instances doesn't make you any less of a permavirgin slop fiend who loves to be cucked by corporations
spamming this cringe bullshit across a bunch of different instances doesn't make you any less of a permavirgin slop fiend who loves to be cucked by corporations
spamming this cringe bullshit across a bunch of different instances doesn't make you any less of a permavirgin slop fiend who loves to be cucked by corporations
Am using my redmi note 8 with lineageos built in custom recovery. And my device was rooted. Recently i installed a OTA update and i loose my root access. As i don't own a laptop (i used my friend laptop to flash custom rom and magisk) it's cery inconvenient to lose root on every OTA update.
I researched about it and find magisk don't root android in a deeper level but in a surface level, thats why an OTA update wipes root access.
So recently i was looking at custom recovery like orangefox and twrp fir fixing this issue. For my device orangefox dropped development and rwrp have updates only one a year and last one was yeras ago...
What should i do ? How can i really keep root on an OTA update without a PC or Second device with OTG cable ?
Is there any other root manager that don't allow to lose root after OTA updates ? And is this issue caused by updating the recovery along with the OTA update ? Just so confusing!
Is there something you absolutely need root for? Or can you get away with not having root? It is always better to not have root capability, as that is a huge attack vector.
Root gives me more control over my device and many powerful apps like shizuku and sdmaid works better than non root. Usually i don't use magisk modules. And one another use is it installs app updates without a waring like play store. That's it.
You could use aurorastore. Sdmaid is useless IMHO. I don't see the point in it. I used to be rooted but now using GrapheneOS I am not anymore and although I miss customising the navbar pill and notification bar height it is safer this way.
Try Lygisk, it's a fork of Magisk that's meant to survive OTAs for devices that only have one system partition. I've used it on a previous phone and it worked great.
I have a PC currently configured to dual boot Windows 10 and Linux Mint. I don't need Windows anymore, but Mint is working just fine and I'd rather avoid wiping the whole thing and starting over. Is there a safe way to just get rid of Windows?
Yes. You can just straight up delete the windows partition. Windows just won't boot anymore, even though doing only this won't remove it from the boot menu.
You can do this from your running linux install, but if you want to grow the linux partition to take up the free space, you'll need to do that from a live usb.
No changes should be necessary. Just delete the windows partition, and grow the linux partition.
Make sure you keep the efi partition, and swap partition, if there is one.
But moving a partition can't be done online. And often enough it's mecessary before growing one, that I generally just tell people to do partition changes offline.
You sound like you know some things that perhaps I don't know.
Slightly different question...
I have a 128GB SSD with Linux Mint MATE 20.3, and I did a full and successful dd backup to my 4TB backup drive.
I have a 100GB external USB hard drive as a test medium for Mint MATE 22.1. I am happy with my test setup, and tried to dd that over to the 128GB SSD. But it wouldn't boot.
I restored the original 128GB SSD image and all is good right now, but why the hell didn't the 100GB>128GB even boot?
Edit: Secure Boot has been disabled all along, screw that headache.
AFAIK dd will create an IDENTICAL environment. This is actually not desirable as it will cause UUID conflicts where multiple partitions in a system have the same UUID.
Unless you're restoring something you imaged, dding one disk onto another requires fiddling with the UUIDs and fstab, to make the partitions unique again, so the kernel can tell them apart.
The goal was to migrate the 100GB to the 128GB, hopefully expand it, and format the 100GB for future temporary/experimental use.
I never planned on having both drives actively running at the same time, so I don't think there should have been any UUID issues, nor did I run across any errors suggesting such an issue.
But even without expanding the partition, the dd command should have 1:1 copied the 100GB, with space to spare, and be bootable, right? Or so I thought...
I had no problem dd restoring the original 128GB contents though, so at least I didn't bork everything. Also the 100GB external USB is still fine. 👍
Is your SSD an NVME drive? It's possible that there are non-UUID references (maybe /etc/fstab, or GRUB's config) to the drive that are involved in the boot process.
Maybe it is looking for /dev/sda2, which is correct on the USB disk, but now everything is on /dev/nvme0n1p2.
Solution: Live disk, mount the root and boot partitions, look at the config files and fix the references.
-Or-
It could be that your boot manager has an an entry for the 128GB drive already, just pointed at the wrong .efi file.
If you were originally on Arch for example(, btw) on the 128GB drive. During the installation of the bootloader you would have inserted an entry into the boot manager like:
But now, since you're on Mint, arch-linux.efi isn't there and the boot manager falls over.
Solution: Live disk, use efibootmgr (wiki.archlinux.org/title/Unifi…), to delete the bad entry (\arch-linux.efi) and add one pointing to the correct file (\mint.efi ? grubx64.efi?).
e: It looks like Mint uses grub, so you could also live disk -> chroot into the environment -> run grub-install (wiki.archlinux.org/title/GRUB#…) to create the entry. You will still have a 'bad' entry which you can delete with efibootmgr.
Meant to be. I literally cut a service panel hole under the laptop to remove or reinstall it whenever I feel like, or maybe eventually upgrade it.
I've been booting off of other devices, like my 8GB USB flash, 100GB USB HDD, and even Live Boot USB DVD drive. It's actually been very convenient, as I can boot off of whatever the hell I want from USB.
My backup is on a 4TB, so really no worries to me, I can more or less freely experiment around with whatever OS I want, and if it doesn't work right, I can just dd my backup over whatever again, and it just works.
But why doesn't the dd 100GB>128GB work as I'd expect?
Obviously that's not the exact dd command I used, for privacy reasons.
There's not many things that are happening at boot: the UEFI Boot Manager points to GRUB which boots your system.
It's almost certainly one of them. The Boot Manager's entries can be fixed with efibootmgr
Most likely you'll also have an issue after it boots because of the swap from being on /dev/sda to /dev/nvme0n1. Your home directory or swap file from the USB drive probably in the fstab like:
Now /dev/sda doesn't exist anymore, because you're on an NVME drive. Now those directories will be at /dev/nvme0n1p3 and /dev/nvme0n1p4. You'll have to edit fstab manually to fix this. If fstab is using UUIDs then it'll work as-is since the partition UUIDs would have been part of the image.
e:
Obviously that’s not the exact dd command I used, for privacy reasons.
In almost all cases it'll be the same situation. The boot manager is pointing the wrong way. You added the entry to the 100GB drive when you (or whatever Mint uses to install) ran grub-install. You also have an existing entry for the OS on the 128GB drive.
The only way it would have worked seamlessly is if you plugged the 128GB drive into the same connection that the 100GB drive was on AND both the original OS and Mint both use grub AND install it in the same location.
It's an easy fix once you know what to look for (just run efibootmgr --unicode and you'll see the boot entries).
I be getting really confused when one config boots from /dev/sda, but when I have my backup drive attached (not the boot device), it boots from /dev/sdb
Hell I dunno, I probably confused the hell out of my laptop plus myself with my cutout mod reconfiguration, but it's happy to boot from almost anything now.
Almost...
Hey, at least I know how to restore to my previous state from backup via dd 👍
I be getting really confused when one config boots from /dev/sda, but when I have my backup drive attached (not the boot device), it boots from /dev/sdb
Hell I dunno, I probably confused the hell out of my laptop plus myself with my cutout mod reconfiguration, but it’s happy to boot from almost anything now.
You probably just have multiple boot entries and some are higher priority, so if you plug in a drive it's boot config is higher in the boot order and since it is available it'll boot that.
Just run
efibootmgr --unicode
You can see all of the entries and their boot order.
I already use Guix shell as a package manager on top of Debian (for programming mainly) and occasionally Arch in an VM (managed by virt-manager).
I don't have the impression that using NixOS or full Guix would save me time. But I will probably try Guix System on a spare disk in the next months, when I have time and energy to get a feel on it.
Oh it almost certainly won't save you time unless you already know Nix and how the ecosystem works. But it does make rolling back to previous configurations basically effortless, which seems like it would obviate your need for a full staging drive.
One can copy the system using a tar backup, fix the mount pointd by changing the volume label (which identifies the mount point), and do a dist upgrade then.
I guess that's the best way to do it on a server. But for desktop systems, I now think it is better to make a list of manually installed packages, and to re-install the packages that are still needed from that list. This has two advantages:
One gets rid of cruft and experimental installs that are no longer needed, which is really important in the long term.
Some systems (I a looking at you GNOME) can break in an ugly way if doing an upgrade instead of a re-install. Very bad behaviour, but it can happen. (And this might answer the question whether Debian is more stable than Arch: Yes, as long as you don't upgrade GNOME).
And one more thing I do for the dot files:
Say, my home folder is in /home/hvb . Then, I install Debian 12 and set /home/hvb/deb12 as my home folder (by editing /etc/passwd). I put my data in /home/hvb/Documents, /home/hvb/Photos/ and sym-link these folders into /home/hvb/deb12. When I upgrade, I first create a new folder /home/hvb/deb14, copy my dot files from deb12, and install a new root partition with my home set to /home/hvb/deb14. Then, I again link my data folders , documents and media such as /home/hvb/Documents into /home/hvb/deb14 . The reason I do this is that new versions of programs can upgrade the dot files to a new syntax or features, but when I switch back to boot Debian 12, the old versions can't necessarily read the newer-version config files (the changes are mostly promised to be backward-compatible but not forward-compatible).
All in all this is a very conservative approach but it works for me with running Debian now for about 15 years in a rather large desktop setup.
And the above also worked well for me with distro-hopping. Though nowadays, it is more recommended to install parallel dual-booted distros on another removable disk since such installs can also modify grub and EFI setup, early graphics drivers and so on, even if in theory dual-boot installs should be completely independent... but my experience is that is not any more always guaranteed.
Another possibly quicker way to do this is a larger BTRFS disk and create subvolumes from snapshots and mount these. When the subvolumes are no longer needed, they can be deleted like any folder.
Note: the growing the partition from a live USB thing is only necessary if you want it all to be one partition. If it's a separate drive, or even if it's not, you can just format the old Windows partition/drive and mount it as a new storage volume.
Why do you try to make Linux seem unusable? It's not "Linux"'s fault proprietary software doesn't work on it. Would you criticize GNOME, KDE Plasma etc. and any of the gazillion other pieces of software exclusive to Linux for not working on W*ndows to reach a wider audience next?
Not a problem for me. All the software I need is either available as native Linux or runs ok under Wine.
I'm ready to ditch Windows entirely at this point. I just need to find the best way to do that, without having to rebuild the Linux side of my dual boot PC.
You can use the gparted tool to graphically remove the partition(s) and then format them to whatever file system type you are interested in and just have those mounted as extra data drives. Or merge them into your Linux partition (depending on setup). That will require gparted to be run as sudo as you are interacting with disks.
Alternatively, you can a tool like fdisk to change partitioning in terminal. You can pull the disk info using something like lsblk, so if you had a specific drive it might be sudo fdisk /dev/nvme0n1, then you'd want to print the current table and look through the help.
Either way, a good way to do it might be to use dd (or a different disk image tool) to copy your Linux installation partitions to a portable hard drive, and make sure the image works. Then wipe the drive and copy the Linux partitions back to it via dd or another imaging tool.
Hi, I didn't see the answer if you only have your pc and no other big storage : If you still have the installation usb or recreate one. Boot on it then you open gparted with that you remove the two partition off windows, the main with the system and the recovery one (if there is) but don't touch the first or last partition esp if it exits. Then you can expand the partitions to get the free space. Extend to the right is fast but extend to the left can be really slow and prone to failures. I case you Linux partition are all on the right you can also create new main partition, do the install of the linux on this one, then reboot on the USB, move the user and configuration files on the new system, delete old installation partitions, then extend the new install to take the full drive. There is commands to remove the old esp entries I don't remember yet. This can take few hours so be patient.
The other option with a backup (dd) of the main partition is obviously safer but take nearly the same amount of time and need an external drive.
With how expensive AI seems to be, it's baffling to me how companies expect to turn a profit on it. 30B a year sounds more like the budget for an entire government scientific agency. And if that's just for the data services...
microsoft already admitted it doesnt generate profit, so all these companies, including google, is ramming AI into all thier devices and services to recoup the losses.
Even copilot explains that it's answers are crippled by responding faster with less accuracy to reduce resource usage and there's nothing the paying customer can do about it.
Wtf, it doesn't make a lot of sens since open ai doesn't have the monopole of ia anymore. Also the only service they found to sell is literally a chatbot wich no company will find interesting if it cost too much
I did a very deep dive into the history of Libre Software and stuff, and how "Open Source" became a term. And speculated out of it a whole theory about AI, ICE and US Politics in general.
Instagram accounts that primarily feature images of children, but are run by adult users, will no longer be recommended to “potentially suspicious adults.”
The Verge is about technology and how it makes us feel. Founded in 2011, we offer our audience everything from breaking news to reviews to award-winning features and investigations, on our site, in video, and in podcasts.
I'm about to deploy a fix and when I do any old scheduled posts will get published. If you'd like to change the date on your scheduled posts, please do so now.
Oh, okay! If it's being worked on, that's all I needed to know! I'm just going to delete them and publish them normally, but I wanted to make sure I wasn't doing something wrong so next time I tried I wouldn't just be repeating a mistake.
Hey good folks, i.e. Rimu & PugJesus@piefed.social / piefed.social/u/PugJesus (pardon, not yet sure how to correctly tag here),
I happened to have this same issue last week, and am pleased to see today that the bugfix seems to have worked! Ah, and one other useful thing I discovered was that one can go back and correct a post if one happened to have botched the scheduled time, previously:
I couldn't find a way to go back to that post directly, but sure enough, I pulled up browser history, went back to the post link, made the edits, and it successfully posted at the corrected, specified time! 😃
Chinese state-sponsored hackers have exploited vulnerabilities in Microsoft software to breach sensitive systems around the world, including those of the
Sorry, I didn't realise it was paywalled. It didn't prompt me to pay when I opened it. It's not a source I usually use, but I couldn't find an alternative unless from much less reputable sites.
I’m not a fan of the laws regardless, but if we pretend for a second they’re justified, it’s worth considering how they should work in a case like Wikipedia. Wikipedia has quite strong protections against problem content already, and that’s because it has a shared global view of content with effective moderation tools and a wide moderator base that respects the rules. That reality should be taken into account in the governments new rules. On the other hand, anyone who understands how this all works was already against this stupid law, so I guess they didn’t get any useful feedback internally
Protection, flush with billions in new funding, is seeking “advanced AI” technologies to surveil urban residential areas, increasingly sophisticated autonomous systems, and even the ability to see through walls.
A CBP presentation for an “Industry Day” summit with private sector vendors, obtained by The Intercept, lays out a detailed wish list of tech CBP hopes to purchase, like satellite connectivity for surveillance towers along the border and improved radio communications. But it also shows that state-of-the-art, AI-augmented surveillance technologies will be central to the Trump administration’s anti-immigrant campaign, which will extend deep into the interior of the North American continent, hundreds of miles from international borders as commonly understood.
Wouldn't surprising me if they already do. They got all kinds of stuff at their check points and you have few constitutional rights there (even less so in this admin)
"When the students poured into Tiananmen Square, the Chinese government almost blew it. Then they were vicious, they were horrible, but they put it down with strength. That shows you the power of strength. Our country is right now perceived as weak."
Is this real? This can't be real. Then, on the other hand, it's the American president. The guy who said that ancient Rome and the US have always been allied.
Judge rules Epstein grand jury records will remain sealed ABC News 3–4 minutes
The records were related to grand juries convened in West Palm Beach.
A federal judge in Florida denied a Justice Department request to unseal grand jury records tied to federal investigations into Epstein, according to a public order released Wednesday.
The request is one of three made by the Justice Department to judges in New York and Florida seeking to unseal records from federal investigations into Epstein.
This photo provided by the New York State Sex Offender Registry shows Jeffrey Epstein, March 28, 2017.
New York State Sex Offender Registry via AP
According to the order by District Judge Robin Rosenberg, the records the department sought to unseal related to grand juries convened in West Palm Beach in 2005 and 2007 that had investigated Epstein.
Judge Rosenberg faulted the Justice Department for failing to outline sufficient arguments to justify the unsealing of the records, which are normally protected under strict secrecy rules.
Rosenberg's opinion states her "hands are tied" given existing precedent in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals which only permits the disclosure of such grand jury materials under narrow exceptions.
She further denied a request to transfer the issue into the jurisdiction of the Southern District of New York, where two judges are separately mulling over similar motions from the department seeking to unseal grand jury records tied to Epstein and his longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell.
A Justice Department spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the order.
Popular Reads
Meanwhile, a federal judge in New York denied Ghislaine Maxwell's request to review grand jury testimony related to Epstein.
"It is black-letter law that defendants generally are not entitled to access to grand jury materials," U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer wrote.
Attorney General Pam Bondi speaks during a news conference with President Donald Trump in the Brady Briefing Room of the White House, June 27, 2025, in Washington.
Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images, Files
Maxwell's lawyers requested access to the sensitive grand jury records to determine if Maxwell would take a position on the records' release.
Judge Engelmayer wrote that there is no "compelling necessity" for Maxwell to review the records. An objection from Maxwell into unsealing the records could further complicate the process of potentially releasing the records.
"She has not shown, or attempted to show, that the grand jury materials in her case are apt to reveal any deficiency in the proceedings leading to her indictment," he wrote.
Judge Engelmayer noted that he plans to "expeditiously" review the transcripts himself and would consider providing an excerpt or synopsis to Maxwell's lawyers.
Can’t Trump just issue an executive order like he has done for everything else? What’s so special about this? It can’t be because he doesn’t have authority because he didn’t have authority for most of the other EOs. It’s probably just smokescreen and there is no intention of releasing anything about his pedo mate Epstein.
...you're redirecting stderr to the stdout's destination while stdout is still sending output to the screen. So any permission errors encountered will go to the screen, not to rsa-keys.log.
From the bash manpage:
==================
Note that the order of redirections is significant. For example, the command
ls > dirlist 2>&1
directs both standard output and standard error to the file dirlist, while the command
ls 2>&1 > dirlist
directs only the standard output to file dirlist, because the standard error was duplicated from the standard output before the standard output was redirected to dirlist.
==================
Commands given to the shell are evaluated and processed in a specific order and fashion, and this is one quirk of that that many people are unaware of.
(...) If |& is used, command1's standard error, in addition to its standard output, is connected to command2's standard input through the pipe; it is shorthand for 2>&1 |. This implicit redirection of the standard error to the standard output is performed after any redirections specified by command1.
Just to be clear, because some seem to conflate Bash with Shell. If not specified, assume POSIX shell, that's how /bin/sh is handled as well. And that has no |&.
Grazie infinite a tutta la Redazione di Gazeta Destinacioni, che pubblicizza la mia ultima opera "Sorella di Perfezione" (LFA Publisher). È una sorpresa inaspettata, e sono al settimo cielo.
SORELLA DI PERFEZIONE da “Sorella di Perfezione” di Giuseppe Iannozzi – LFA Publisher Ringrazio. Piano chino il capo, come un bambino. Ringrazio la gentilezza e la bellezza che ti appartengono,…
I suppose it would have given a new meaning, or a different understanding, of the chaos in the film. Come to think of it (been a long time since I have seen the film) I can't remember if there was a slant to any one religion injected in the film. Seems like it was very vaguely worded, 'passing over to the other side,' 'angry spirits,' and the 'beast.'
Xbox controversially raised the base price of its mainline games to $80 in an announcement a few weeks ago. Now, it seems to be backtracking. Good, I say.
I was just wondering that, too. Wasn't the first one almost like an indie title? Not sure, how much I'm mixing it up with Outer Wilds, but Wikipedia tells me their teams were around a similar size anyways...
Nel tentare (in parte invano, ma in parte no, dai) di alleviare le mie sofferenze giornaliere, dovute alle solite impossibilità di incartamento, eccomi qui di nuovo ad uscirmene fuori dal letterale nulla con un nuovissimo dei miei toolini pazzurdi… Ma a ‘sto giro ho davvero poca voglia di scherzare, quindi, per una buona volta, metto […]
il cartafacenzio di octo e la foglianza interattiva!!! (Papiellify, nuova app per creare fogli decorati)
Nel tentare (in parte invano, ma in parte no, dai) di alleviare le mie sofferenze giornaliere, dovute alle solite impossibilità di incartamento, eccomi qui di nuovo ad uscirmene fuori dal letterale nulla con un nuovissimo dei miei toolini pazzurdi… Ma a ‘sto giro ho davvero poca voglia di scherzare, quindi, per una buona volta, metto la fine della storia all’inizio: l’aggeggio di questa volta è caricato su https://hub.octt.eu.org/Papiellify/ (ed era da tanto che non mettevo una roba nuova lì sopra…), ed in poche parole è nientedimeno che un (o meglio, il; credo sia l’unico al mondo) fogliatore… 🍀
In pratica, ero qui di nuovo a voler stampare fogli con grafichine personalizzate, come mostrai qualche altra volta, ma il solo pensiero di dovermi ancora mettere a fare tutta quella roba strana in programmi tipo Office (di qualsiasi vendor; io uso Libre, ma non cambia) — assolutamente non fatti per questo tipo di cose, nonostante stranamente usati da tutti per questo tipo di cose — piazzando nei bordi le immagini, poi le righe, e infine non ne parliamo di layout un pochino più complessi… mi fa venire subito la nausea e dunque addio alle intenzioni spassose. Ovviamente, come all’assoluto solito, sono una ragazza magica, e quindi, piuttosto che avvilirmi, è spuntato fuori il momento di mettermi all’opera, con la programmazione… e questa qui è la primissima versione abbastanza utilizzabile da essere pubblicata, gnam! 🥰
Ho avuto rubamenti di tempo vari adesso eh, quindi ci ho messo qualche giorno in più che normalmente non avrei impiegato per arrivare al punto di qualcosa che già mi sta essendo di enorme utilità, ma la app per ora è ancora abbastanza semplice, pure se non sembra… Ci sono tanti controlli a schermo, si, e si possono già creare infiniti layout sfiziosi semplicemente maneggiando con questi form, certo, però questo ancora non è niente rispetto a quello che potrebbe essere… neanche il tempo di saltellare per i progressi già fatti finora, infatti, e già sento la mancanza di una gestione multi-pagina, o di più preset di stile impostabili, ma vedrò di adoperarmi man mano che le necessità spunteranno fuori (a me, o ad altri… vi scongiuro, apprezzate il mio lavoro cartiaco…) 😳
Io invito come sempre a provare per credere (e sennò che cazzo li metto online a fare i miei tool…), ma in buona sostanza questo è come funziona la app: sfruttando non casualmente, ma proprio esattamente (cioè, usare altro di base mi avrebbe richiesto infinitamente più lavoro), le funzioni di layout intrinseche della piattaforma web (il CSS, bono!), permette di gestire dei livelli (che nella pagina sono non altro che elementi HTML con applicati particolari stili), che sono definiti da immagini caricabili o pattern preprogrammati (come codici SVG), e sono personalizzabili in una marea di criteri tra cui dimensioni, spaziature, slittamenti, e per i pattern cose come spessore del tratto, colori e vattelappesca — tutto impostabile precisamente, e altamente risminchiabile, senza scrivere codice! 😜 Qui, per esempio, ho creato due diversi papielli (ovviamente stampabili, e che goduria) per provare un po’ il tutto: il primo, a righe azzurre spaziate a 8mm e con una decorazione di Sailor Moon in basso a destra (dimensionata in modo ideale per l’A5, ma ovviamente modificabile); ed il secondo, con una griglia a puntini di 10mm decorata ogni 4 con dei cuoricini… ed entrambi usano solo due livelli, quindi si può fare solo di meglio. Questi esempi, ed eventualmente altri che creerò, li ho salvati in JSON con l’apposita funzione del menu in-app, e chiunque voglia usarli può semplicemente caricarli nell’applicazione, sono scaricabili qui: memos.octt.eu.org/m/gnwNvbS4zv…. 💖
Un bonus per me, per concludere, è che ho notato che sui browser web mobile questa app funziona a metà… e detto così sembra qualcosa di negativo, ma io ero partita dal presupposto che la UI di questa app dovesse essere così intricata da essere virtualmente inutilizzabile su smartphone; quindi, scoprire che in realtà si riesce realisticamente ad usare (forse anche grazie al fatto che il pannello delle opzioni si può restringere, e viceversa quello dell’anteprima) mi fa piacere. Il problema tuttavia è che, sia da Firefox che da Chromium, su Android (almeno, sul mio Xiaomi del cazzo…), l’esportazione su PDF o in stampa è rotta, e la pagina esce vuota… quindi poi dovrò usare qualche libreria JavaScript strana per esportare dal lato del mio codice, anziché delegare al browser, che abbiamo capito fa cagare. Una cosa comunque è certa: con tutte queste caselle di input, slider per i numeri, ed alcune opzioni forse relativamente criptiche, non è un software adatto agli utonti deboli di cuore… ma, il suo lo fa al top (credo). 😺
You think AOC is to blame here? Really? You think AOC is sneaking into rooms with republicans where they all agree not to talk about Israel’s weapons? That’s your truth?
New research from the University of Waterloo's Cybersecurity and Privacy Institute demonstrates that any artificial intelligence (AI) image watermark can be removed, without the attacker needing to know the design of the watermark, or even wheth…
I think maybe an update to the image format standards, where it like somehow includes a hash of the instrument that has taken the photo and video, and thus, only such media that can be verified to have been taken by a physical instrument can be used in like legal matters, or reporting or journals.
Either this hash can be verified by some algorithm, or maybe the media could depend on this hash in such a way that the media is corrupted if it gets altered.
There are already plans for metadata signing. I think some high end Canon cameras might do it already. It basically allows proof (via public private key of the hash) that a particular camera took that photo.
The idea is that you can create a chain of custody with an image. Each edit requires a new signature, with each party responsible for verifying the previous chain, to protect their own reputation.
It's far from perfect, but will help a lot with things like legal cases.
Depends on the hash - some are tracable to a crypotographic public key and thus cannot be faked. Most are not but there are options that can be. Normally we refer to such things as signed not a hash but same thing to the layman who doesn't understand this.
In order for it to be traceable with a public key, it needs to be signed with the private key. That means the private key has to be on the camera. That means it can be extracted from the camera and leaked.
Maybe. There are ways to assign a private key that is not easy to extract. a chip that creates a private key on first poweron and then saves to internal memory for example.
Not easy to extract sure, but is it secure enough for you to claim that it hasnt been leaked and so forms a secure chain of custody? Once one has been leaked then that can be used to sign any fake pictures you like. I woudnt buy that for anything for serious than is this meme picture real.
The obvious limitation being that you can take a real photo with attestation with a real camera of a real computer screen displaying any fake shit you can imagine, then you have an officially hashed photo of anything.
Leica, Sony, Nikon, and Canon have backed an Adobe-created digital signature solution for authentication of photos directly in the camera, including metadata like time/date stamps. But that's mainly for journalism and professional grade cameras, not the cell phones that 90+% of new images are created on.
There is a solution, but y'all aren't going to like it.
The solution is blockchain. Actually, it's even worse, the solution is NFT's.
Not the scammy, crypto bro, nonsense it has been used for; but the actual technology.
A cryptographically secure digital token that can track where something was made, where it's being used, who has the rights to it, and ensures that it's authentic and not some copy made with AI.
Unfortunately, thanks to crypto bros, the technology has become so tainted by scams that most people get upset just hearing the letters NFT, so adoption isn't likely.
I don't think this is that controversial. If you take out NFTs, it's using the block chain as a hash. I think that works, but at that point you might as well use regular hashes to verify the integrity of your video
There are other privacy issues with having an indelible marker as to the origin and chain of custody of every digital artifact. And other non-privacy issues.
So the idea here is that my phone camera attaches a crypro token to the metadata of every photo it takes? (Or worse, embeds it into the image steganographically like printer dots.) Then if I send that photo to a friend in signal, that app attaches a token indicating the transfer? And so on?
If that's a video of say, police murdering someone, maybe I don't want a perfect trail pointing back to me just to prove I didnt deep fake it. And if that's where we are, then every video of power being abused is going to "be fake" because no sane person would sacrifice their privacy, possibly their life, to "prove" a video isnt AI generated.
And those in power, the mainstream media say, aren't going to demonstrate the crypto chain of custody on every video they show on the news. They're going to show whatever they want, then say "its legit, trust us!" and most people will.
These are the fundamental issues with crypto that people actually don't understand: too much of it is actually opt-in, it's unclear to most people what's actually proved or protected, and it doesn't actually address or understsnd where trust, authority, and power actually come from.
Sorry for blowing this on you, but fuck blockchain, fuck NFTs.
What we need is better understanding of cryptography.
PGP has solved this problems decades ago, and crypto has just borrowed some parts, but made it worse in every possible way and into incomprehensible depths.
I thought GPG was bad? I don't have enough personal experience with it to quickly summarize or opine on the merits of either of these two articles, but:
I do agree with "fuck NFTs" though, and mostly agree with "fuck cryptocurrency" (mostly because porn and drugs are in my view legitimate use cases for at least a hypothetical non-environmentally-destructive cryptocurrency).
It’s been more than five years since The PGP Problem was published, and I still hear from people who believe that using PGP (whether GnuPG or another OpenPGP implementation) is a thing they should be doing.
It isn’t.
I don’t blame individual Internet users for this confusion. There is a lot of cargo-culting around communication tools in the software community, and the evangelists for the various projects muddy the waters for the rest of us.
The part of the free and open source software community that thinks PGP is just dandy, and therefore evangelize the hell out of it to unsuspecting people, are the same kind of people that happily use XMPP+OMEMO, Matrix, or weird Signal forks that remove forward secrecy and think it’s fine.
Not to mince words: The same people who believe PGP is good are also famously not great at cryptography engineering.
I’m not here to litigate the demerits of PGP. The Latacora article I linked above makes the same arguments I would make today, and is a more entertaining read.
It is of my opinion as a security engineer that specializes in applied cryptography that nobody should use PGP, because there’s virtually always a better tool for the job you want to use PGP for.
(And for the uncommon use cases, offering a secure, purpose-built replacement is a work-in-progress.)
Note: I’m deliberately being blunt in this post because literally more than a decade of softspokenness from cryptography experts has done nothing to talk users off the PGP cliff. Being direct seems more effective than being tactful.
If you want a gentler touch, ask your cryptographer. If you don’t have a cryptographer, hire one.
Instead, let’s examine the “use cases” of PGP and what you should be using instead. (Some of this is redundant with the Latacora article, but I’m also writing it 5 years later, so some things have changed.)
This section contains specific tools to solve the same problems that PGP tries to solve, but better.
What makes these recommendations better than PGP?
Simply, they don’t make cryptographers want to run the other way screaming when they look under the hood. PGP does.
Some people are forced to use PGP because they work for a government that legally requires them to use PGP. In that corner case, your hands are tied by lawyers, so you don’t need to bother with what cryptographers recommend.
Note that this is an ecosystem-wide consideration, not something that specific individuals must manually opt into for each of their hobby projects. The only downside to Sigstore is it hasn’t been widely adopted yet.
If you’re a Python developer, you can just use PEP 740 to get attestations with Trusted Publishers, which gives you Sigstore for free. For most developers, this is as simple as setting up a GitHub Action to publish to PyPI.
This is a developing trend: Other programming language and package management ecosystems are following suit. I expect to see Sigstore attestations baked into NPM and Maven before the next US presidential election. With any luck, your favorite programming language could be on this list too.
Sigstore doesn’t just give you a signature that you check with a long-lived public key, nor does it require you to do the Web Of Trust rigamarole.
Rather, Sigstore gives you a lot for free. Sigstore was designed around ephemeral signing certificates rather than a long-lived private key. It was purpose-built for preventing supply-chain attacks against open source software.
Alternatively, use minisign. If your package ecosystem doesn’t support Sigstore yet, you can get by with minisign (which is signify-compatible) until they modernize.
You can also use SSH signatures, if you’d prefer. (More on that below.)
There are a lot of other encrypted backup tools that work fine, if you don’t want to give Colin Percival your business. I don’t have a financial stake in any of them, nor have I audited them thoroughly.
Borg uses reasonable cryptography, but I haven’t had the time to review it carefully.
Kopia looks fine, but I really hate that they misuse “zero knowledge” to describe an encryption protocol (rather than a proof system). We should not reward this misbehavior by marketers.
The point is: You’ve got options.
Too many options, in my opinion, to settle for PGP.
Not a lot to say here. I’ve written a lot about this over the years. Misuse-resistant cryptography libraries–especially ones that make key management less painful for users–are the way to go.
Some PGP proponents will insist that AEAD is possible now, but as long as the installed base of PGP remains backwards compatible with the lowest common denominator, that’s what your software uses.
Just use age. Or rage, if you’re a Rust enthusiast.
(And if you have concerns about “which age key should I trust?”, I’m already planning an age-v1 extension for the Public Key Directory project. More on that below.)
Security teams around the world insist that they need PGP for bug bounty submissions or security operations, but Signal does this job better than PGP ever did.
Once upon a time, you needed to give people a phone number to use Signal, but that hasn’t been the case for a long time. Still, many people have missed that memo and think it’s a requirement.
My Signal username is soatok.45. Go ahead and message me. You won’t learn my phone number that way.
If you want the ability to vend a transparently verifiable public key for a given user, that’s one of the use cases for the Public Key Directory I’m designing in order to build end-to-end encryption for the Fediverse.
Although this is purpose-built for the Fediverse, I’ve deliberately included support for Auxiliary Data messages, whose formats will be specified by protocol extensions.
Rather than trying to grok the Web-of-Trust, you can simply have your software check that multiple independent Public Key Directories have verified the record, since its inclusion is published in an append-only transparency log, secured by a Merkle tree.
My design doesn’t preclude any manual key verification, or key-signing parties, or whatever other PGP cultural weirdness you want to do with these public keys. It just establishes a baseline trustworthiness even if you’re not a paranoid computer nerd.
My project isn’t finished yet. In the meantime, you can manually check public keys when using the other recommendations on this page.
Email is insecure. Even with PGP, it’s default-plaintext, which means that even if you do everything right, some totally reasonable person you mail, doing totally reasonable things, will invariably CC the quoted plaintext of your encrypted message to someone else (we don’t know a PGP email user who hasn’t seen this happen). PGP email is forward-insecure. Email metadata, including the subject (which is literally message content), are always plaintext.
There isn’t a recommendation for encrypted email because that’s not a thing people should be doing.
Now, there exists a minority of extremely technical computer user for which Signal is a nonstarter (because you need a smartphone and valid phone number to enroll in the first place).
Because those people are generally not the highest priority of cryptographers (who are commonly focused on the privacy of common folk–including people in poor and developing countries where smartphones are more common than desktop computers), there presently isn’t really a good recommendation for private messaging that meets their constraints.
If you find someone insisting that they “need” encrypted email, read up on the XY Problem. In a lot of cases, that’s what’s happening here.
Do they ipso facto need email (as in, specifically the email protocols and email software)?
And do they care more about this constraint, or the privacy of their communications?
Because if their goal just to communicate privately, see above.
If the tool they’re using being email is more important than privacy, they should consider sending empty messages with an attachment, and use age to encrypt the actual message before attaching it.
That’s serviceable, just beware that everything Latacora wrote about encrypted emails still applies to your use case, so expect someone to CC or forward your message as plaintext.
(Unless you’re legally required to use PGP because of a government regulation… in which case, why do you care about my recommendations if you’re chained by the ankle to your government’s bad technology choices?)
Finally, miss me with the “but someone can screenshot Signal” genre of objections.
As Latacora noted, people accidentally fuck up PGP all the time! It’s very easy to do.
Conversely, you have to deliberately leak something from Signal. There is no plaintext mode.
PGP fails to be a Signal competitor, in ways that are worse than Threema, Matrix, or OMEMO.
Watch This Space
With all that said, I am actually designing an encrypted messaging protocol that will have an email-like user experience, except:
Everything is always end-to-end encrypted, with forward secrecy.
It’s not backwards compatible with insecure email.
It doesn’t use PGP, or any 1990’s era cryptography.
I can’t promise a release date yet. I’m prioritizing end-to-end encryption for the Fediverse before I write the specification for that project (tentatively called AWOO, but the cryptography underpinning both projects should be similar).
Maybe 2026? We’ll see!
If someone beats me to the punch, and their design is actually good, I’ll update the post and replace this with a specific recommendation.
I hate typing 'asymmetric key cryptography', and GPG is just three letters.
Those blog posts explain a lot, but one use case is missing (at least I don't see it apart from git commit signing), and that is verifying the source of a public message.
And I do wish we tried using the private keys more. Specially now when anyone can deepfake anything.
If I ever release my nudes, never trust them unless they are signed and you can check them with public key in my profile.
The tech would have been great for bestowing ownership over the digital goods bought with microtransactions, but never would have gotten there since corpos have the rule of law under their thumb.
You can have whatever token you want with all the metadata, licensing and ownership information you want...
...unless you plan on only seeing images in your own platform, nobody gives a shit, people will take screenshots and image files and share and use them however they want. There's no world in which you load a full DRM plugin or do 4 different types of handshake with a full blockchain just to load a jpeg into a comment.
Video - Rami Abou Jamous, a French-speaking journalist from Gaza, sent Le Monde a voice note describing the hellish struggle to find food and water as Israel has severely restricted access to humanitarian aid since March 2.
i keep seeing these people's experiences on tiktok and rednote and still can't imagine what life is like knowing that the entire world is going to do nothing but watch as you live out the last few hours/days of your life with the knowledge you're going to die slowly from starvation and that the lucky ones are the ones who die quickly from a missile strike or gunshot from an idf soldier.
you beg and you plead for help and an overwhelming majority just ignore you, with the few that will try to help are just as impotent as you are to help your situation.
Microsoft C++ Code Analysis has been updated in Visual Studio 2022 version 17.14 to provide better tracking, justification, and overall management of warning suppressions.
Israeli passengers on a cruise ship arriving in Greece on 22 July were unable to disembark the vessel due to a large crowd of pro-Palestine protesters demonstrating against the Israeli genocide of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.
The MS Crown Iris, owned by Israeli cruise line Mano Maritime, arrived on Tuesday at the Greek island of Syros in the Aegean Sea. The passengers were supposed to disembark for six hours.
However, they were forced to remain on board due to the protests in support of Palestine.
[...]
A group of the Greek island’s residents organized the protest and posted on social media that they “raise their fists in solidarity with the Palestinians in Gaza,” adding that “it is unacceptable that tourists from Israel continue to be welcomed here while the Palestinians are suffering in the Strip.”
A group of residents on the island of Syros organized the protest and said it was ‘unacceptable’ that Israeli tourists be welcomed as Palestinians suffer from starvation and war in Gaza
l'ex Diggita.it, progetto partito nel 2007 è stato abbanonato definitivamente nel 2024, ora c'è diggita.com che gira su lemmy, gestito da un diverso gruppo di volontari facenti parte dell’associazione no-profit Fedimedia APS.
In origine il progetto era nato nel 2007 sul vecchio dominio diggita.it come iniziativa personale mia e di un’altra persona. Avrei voluto migrare nel Fediverso già diversi anni fa, ma il percorso non è stato semplice: il software che stavamo seguendo, Kbin, è stato abbandonato dallo sviluppatore; anche il fork Mbin non ha avuto il successo sperato e ora rimane con una misera eredità di una ventina di istanze. Alla fine, l’unica piattaforma che risulta affidabile per aprire un sito con gruppi tematici sembrò essere Lemmy, e così nel 2024 abbiamo deciso di ripartire da lì, da zero iscritti, da zero articoli , abbandonando quindi 17 anni di articoli e 80mila iscritti 😅
In pratica, abbiamo buttato via 17 anni di lavoro per amore del feiverso. La persona che gestiva il progetto precedente su diggita.it ha lasciato ed è subentrato alla gestione tecnica il gruppo devol e fedimedia con l'intento di fare un reboot etico e no-profit.
L’intero archivio dal 2007 al 2024 è stato cancellato, dato che la proprietà è cambiata e non ha nulla più a che fare con la precedente gestione, abbiamo deciso di ricominciare da zero con un progetto dal basso, partecipato dalle persone di mastodon.uno e del fediverso.
Le uniche cose che abbiamo conservato del vecchio Diggita sono il nome e il logo che, per la cronaca, si ispiravano a Digg, un portale americano a cui ci rifacevamo e che ormai non esiste più da anni 😁
Art by Harubaki
Art by Scruff
via XKCD
Art by AJ
rocket9
in reply to rocket9 • • •This video complements the text tutorial at trevors-tutorials.com/0002-get…
Trevors-Tutorials.com is where you can find free programming tutorials. The focus is on Go and Ebitengine game development. Watch the for more info.
The Go Programming Language
go.dev