Don’t show edit mark if comment was edited in less than 5 minutes

I think 5 minutes is too much. Why not 2 minutes or 5 minutes only if the comment does not have votes and replies?

Thanks for the hard work!!!

I'm curious how the new tag system will work. Could you post when it could be tested in any of the test instances?

Btw, I use a bot to post twice daily in !workingclasscalendar@lemmy.world and I've been (ab)using the search system to tag with nice results:

• Tags: #Labor, #Colonialism, #Massacre, #Independence.

Edited: ooops removed backslashes

Using LLMs does not obviate the need for the human user to understand what the code is doing. I've also found that, as with any tool, it takes time to actually learn to use LLMs effectively.

In particular, I find it's really important to understand the problem being solved, and then come up with the solution yourself. One approach I’ve found to be effective is to stub out the functions myself, and have the agent fill in the blanks for me. This helps focus the LLM and prevent it from going off into the weeds.

Another trick I find handy is to ask the agent to first write a plan for the solution. Then I can review the plan and tell the agent to adjust it as needed before implementing. Agents are also pretty good at writing tests, and tests are much easier to evaluate for correctness because good tests are just independent functions that do one thing and don’t have a deep call stack. My current approach is to get the LLM to write the plan, add tests, and then focus on making sure I understand the tests and that they pass. At that point I have a fairly high degree of confidence that the code is indeed doing what’s needed. The tests act as a contract for the agent to fill and as a specification for the defined functionality.

I suspect that programming languages might start shifting in the direction of contracts in general. I can see stuff like this becoming the norm, where you specify the signature for the function, and you could also specify parameters like computational complexity and memory usage. The agent could then try to figure out how to fill the contract you’ve defined. It would be akin to genetic algorithm approach where the agent could converge on a solution over time. If that’s the direction things will be moving in, then current skills could be akin to being able to write assembly by hand. Useful in some niche situations, but not necessary vast majority of the time.

Finally, it’s very helpful to structure things using small components components that can be tested independently and composed together to build bigger things. As long as the component functions in the intended way, I don’t necessarily care about the quality of the code internally. I can treat them as black boxes as long as they’re doing what’s expected at the surface level. This is already the approach we take with libraries as we don’t audit every line of code in a library we include in a project. We just look at its surface level API provided.

Incidentally, I’m noticing that functional style seems to work really well here. Having an assembly line of pure functions naturally breaks up a problem into small building blocks that you can reason about in isolation. It’s kind of like putting Lego blocks together. The advantage over stuff like microservies here is that you don’t have to deal with the complexity of orchestration and communication between the services.

GitHub - webyrd/Barliman: Prototype smart text editor

Prototype smart text editor. Contribute to webyrd/Barliman development by creating an account on GitHub.

^GitHub

People have mentioned NextDNS (just a DNS setting) and TrackerControl (connects as a VPN on android/grapheneos)

I can mention also DNSNet (which actually also uses a VPN) and PCAPdroid

There are other options, with more features. Lists exist online

The article says that Hamas wants Israel to starve Gazans, it doesn't say that Israel doesn't starve Gazans.

It literally says Israel uses hunger as weapon (against Hamas and against –or at least not caring about– civilians): "Hamas has benefited from Israel’s decision to use food as a lever against the terror group, because the catastrophic conditions for civilians have generated an international outcry, which is worsening Israel’s global standing and forcing it to reverse course."

E: You partly approve the article yourself and I'm aware of the fact it's Israel committing the genocide.

Not I nor the article have said that Israel isn't committing genocide. The only thing said is that Hamas profits by it and that Gazans are furious about looters and the Hamas. I don't understand why so many people downvote this, claim I would be paid, claim I would deny the genocide or write 6 comments where 1 would be enough, if not you want to deny Hamas is a terrorist organization which only cares about its own survival.

So why did Hamas agree to a ceasefire in March which Israel broke?

Why is Hamas bending over to accept ceasefire conditions? You are spreading Zionist blood libel and genocide propaganda.