Salta al contenuto principale





Revenue for the State Policy Network and Its Affiliates Increased 77% in Three Years


cross-posted from: sh.itjust.works/post/44902005

The right-wing State Policy Network (SPN) and its affiliates have an overall combined revenue of $270 million, according to an analysis by the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) of the latest publicly available IRS filings. This marks a 77% increase since CMD last reported on SPN’s core finances in 2022.

CMD analyzed the IRS filings of all 64 affiliates of SPN from 2023, with a few available from 2024. The network’s overall combined expenses for this period were $230 million, with net assets coming in at $255 million. These numbers do not include core financials from the Great Plains Public Policy Institute or the Roughrider Policy Center since they bring in less than $50,000 per year and therefore do not have to disclose them, according to IRS regulations.

SPN groups play an integral role in promoting passage of legislation in state houses across the country — by providing academic legitimacy when their members testify at hearings, producing “studies” or model legislation, and attracting media attention. That legislation is sometimes drafted as model bills by corporate lobbyists and lawmakers at SPN’s sister organization, the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).

SPN is holding its annual meeting this week in New Orleans, where school privatization, AI, deregulating nicotine, noncitizen voting, bitcoin, DOGE, and more are on the agenda.

Btw, here is their featured keynote speaker for this years annual meeting.



Meta to spend tens of millions on pro-AI super PAC


Meta plans to launch a super PAC to support California candidates favoring a light-touch approach to AI regulation, Politico reports. The news comes as other Silicon Valley behemoths, like Andreessen Horowitz and OpenAI’s Greg Brockman, pledge $100 million for a new pro-AI super PAC.



Authors celebrate “historic” settlement coming soon in Anthropic class action


A class-action lawsuit against AI company Anthropic over copyright infringement is nearing settlement, with both parties reaching an agreement in principle[^1]. The lawsuit, filed by authors Andrea Bartz, Kirk Wallace Johnson, and Charles Graeber, alleged Anthropic illegally downloaded millions of books to train its AI models[^3].

U.S. District Judge William Alsup certified what could be the largest copyright class action ever, potentially including up to 7 million claimants[^1]. The lawsuit claimed Anthropic pirated books from online sources including Books3, Library Genesis, and Pirate Library Mirror[^3].

"This historic settlement will benefit all class members," said Justin A. Nelson, attorney for the authors[^1]. The parties must file a motion for preliminary approval by September 5, 2025[^1].

While settlement terms remain undisclosed, the case had serious implications - industry advocates warned that if every eligible author filed a claim, it could "financially ruin" the AI industry[^1]. Anthropic had previously argued the lawsuit threatened its survival as a company[^1].

[^1]: Ars Technica - Authors celebrate "historic" settlement coming soon in Anthropic class action
[^3]: LA Times - AI company Anthropic settles with authors who alleged piracy



Microsoft Forces Candy Crush Developers to Use AI Daily




A Dark Money Group Is Secretly Funding High-Profile Democratic Influencers


An initiative aimed at boosting Democrats online offers influencers up to $8,000 a month to push the party line. All they have to do is keep it secret—and agree to restrictions on their content.

https://www.wired.com/story/dark-money-group-secret-funding-democrat-influencers/





ChatGPT influences how we speak


cross-posted from: programming.dev/post/36407755

Research.
“This research focuses on a central issue in the discourse surrounding AI and language: are these language changes happening because we’re using a tool and repeating what it suggested or is language changing because AI is influencing the human language system?” said assistant professor of computational linguistics and principal investigator Tom Juzek. “By analyzing lexical trends before and after ChatGPT was released in 2022, we found a convergence between human word choices and LLM-associated patterns with AI buzzwords.”

While rapid increases in the use of certain words — like Omicron — do occur, these increases are typically due to real-world events. Recent large-scale upticks in the use of words like “delve” and “intricate” in certain fields, especially education and academic writing, are attributed to the widespread introduction of LLMs with a chat function, like ChatGPT, that overuses those buzzwords.

“The changes we are seeing in spoken language are pretty remarkable, especially when compared to historical trends,” Juzek said. “What stands out is the breadth of change: so many words are showing notable increases over a relatively short period. Given that these are all words typically overused by AI, it seems plausible to conjecture a link.”

Words including “surpass,” “boast,” “meticulous,” “strategically,” and “garner” have also seen considerable increases in usage since the release of ChatGPT. While these words are often used in a formal or academic tone, which makes them less common in unscripted, spoken language, researchers found that nearly three-quarters of these target words showed increased usage with some more than doubling in frequency.




ChatGPT influences how we speak


Research.

“This research focuses on a central issue in the discourse surrounding AI and language: are these language changes happening because we’re using a tool and repeating what it suggested or is language changing because AI is influencing the human language system?” said assistant professor of computational linguistics and principal investigator Tom Juzek. “By analyzing lexical trends before and after ChatGPT was released in 2022, we found a convergence between human word choices and LLM-associated patterns with AI buzzwords.”

While rapid increases in the use of certain words — like Omicron — do occur, these increases are typically due to real-world events. Recent large-scale upticks in the use of words like “delve” and “intricate” in certain fields, especially education and academic writing, are attributed to the widespread introduction of LLMs with a chat function, like ChatGPT, that overuses those buzzwords.

“The changes we are seeing in spoken language are pretty remarkable, especially when compared to historical trends,” Juzek said. “What stands out is the breadth of change: so many words are showing notable increases over a relatively short period. Given that these are all words typically overused by AI, it seems plausible to conjecture a link.”

Words including “surpass,” “boast,” “meticulous,” “strategically,” and “garner” have also seen considerable increases in usage since the release of ChatGPT. While these words are often used in a formal or academic tone, which makes them less common in unscripted, spoken language, researchers found that nearly three-quarters of these target words showed increased usage with some more than doubling in frequency.



#ai_


ChatGPT influences how we speak


cross-posted from: programming.dev/post/36407755

Research.
“This research focuses on a central issue in the discourse surrounding AI and language: are these language changes happening because we’re using a tool and repeating what it suggested or is language changing because AI is influencing the human language system?” said assistant professor of computational linguistics and principal investigator Tom Juzek. “By analyzing lexical trends before and after ChatGPT was released in 2022, we found a convergence between human word choices and LLM-associated patterns with AI buzzwords.”

While rapid increases in the use of certain words — like Omicron — do occur, these increases are typically due to real-world events. Recent large-scale upticks in the use of words like “delve” and “intricate” in certain fields, especially education and academic writing, are attributed to the widespread introduction of LLMs with a chat function, like ChatGPT, that overuses those buzzwords.

“The changes we are seeing in spoken language are pretty remarkable, especially when compared to historical trends,” Juzek said. “What stands out is the breadth of change: so many words are showing notable increases over a relatively short period. Given that these are all words typically overused by AI, it seems plausible to conjecture a link.”

Words including “surpass,” “boast,” “meticulous,” “strategically,” and “garner” have also seen considerable increases in usage since the release of ChatGPT. While these words are often used in a formal or academic tone, which makes them less common in unscripted, spoken language, researchers found that nearly three-quarters of these target words showed increased usage with some more than doubling in frequency.




ChatGPT influences how we speak


Research.

“This research focuses on a central issue in the discourse surrounding AI and language: are these language changes happening because we’re using a tool and repeating what it suggested or is language changing because AI is influencing the human language system?” said assistant professor of computational linguistics and principal investigator Tom Juzek. “By analyzing lexical trends before and after ChatGPT was released in 2022, we found a convergence between human word choices and LLM-associated patterns with AI buzzwords.”

While rapid increases in the use of certain words — like Omicron — do occur, these increases are typically due to real-world events. Recent large-scale upticks in the use of words like “delve” and “intricate” in certain fields, especially education and academic writing, are attributed to the widespread introduction of LLMs with a chat function, like ChatGPT, that overuses those buzzwords.

“The changes we are seeing in spoken language are pretty remarkable, especially when compared to historical trends,” Juzek said. “What stands out is the breadth of change: so many words are showing notable increases over a relatively short period. Given that these are all words typically overused by AI, it seems plausible to conjecture a link.”

Words including “surpass,” “boast,” “meticulous,” “strategically,” and “garner” have also seen considerable increases in usage since the release of ChatGPT. While these words are often used in a formal or academic tone, which makes them less common in unscripted, spoken language, researchers found that nearly three-quarters of these target words showed increased usage with some more than doubling in frequency.



#AII


'The tides are turning': Shockwaves as Dem scores double-digit win in red district




in reply to silence7

How long until an executive order saying that grand juries are no longer needed for federal cases?



in reply to silence7

Hey remember when not everyone agreed that cigarettes cause lung cancer? Who was it that funded research in bad faith to suggest that people should totally not worry and keep buying cigarettes... oh right, the people selling cigarettes.
in reply to ol_capt_joe

Believe if it was only now that the revelation that cigarettes cause cancer was in progress, there would be a large, confident contingent of folks swearing they're actually great for you led by the likes of RFK Jr.
in reply to johnny_deadeyes

The tobacco companies funded a small army of shills who said exactly that, publishing fraudulent papers and feeding the media's phony simplistic need for "balance."
in reply to silence7

"I'm just asking questions!"

Sealioning as a justification for corrupt policy.




Lynx-R1 Headset Makers Release 6DoF SLAM Solution As Open Source


cross-posted from: ibbit.at/post/37907

Some readers may recall the Lynx-R1 headset — it was conceived as an Android virtual reality (VR) and mixed reality (MR) headset with built-in hand tracking, designed to be open where others were closed, allowing developers and users access to inner workings in defiance of walled gardens. It looked very promising, with features rivaling (or surpassing) those of its contemporaries.

Founder [Stan Larroque] recently announced that Lynx’s 6DoF SLAM (simultaneous location and mapping) solution has been released as open source. ORB-SLAM3 (GitHub repository) takes in camera images and outputs a 6DoF pose, and does so effectively in real-time. The repository contains some added details as well as a demo application that can run on the Lynx-R1 headset.

The unusual optics are memorable. (Hands-on Lynx-R1 by Antony Vitillo)

As a headset the Lynx-R1 had a number of intriguing elements. The unusual optics, the flip-up design, and built-in hand tracking were impressive for its time, as was the high-quality mixed reality pass-through. That last feature refers to the headset using its external cameras as inputs to let the user see the real world, but with the ability to have virtual elements displayed and apparently anchored to real-world locations. Doing this depends heavily on the headset being able to track its position in the real world with both high accuracy and low latency, and this is what ORB-SLAM3 provides.

A successful crowdfunding campaign for the Lynx-R1 in 2021 showed that a significant number of people were on board with what Lynx was offering, but developing brand new consumer hardware is a challenging road for many reasons unrelated to developing the actual thing. There was a hands-on at a trade show in 2021 and units were originally intended to ship out in 2022, but sadly that didn’t happen. Units still occasionally trickle out to backers and pre-orders according to the unofficial Discord, but it’s safe to say things didn’t really go as planned for the R1.

It remains a genuinely noteworthy piece of hardware, especially considering it was not a product of one of the tech giants. If we manage to get our hands on one of them, we’ll certainly give you a good look at it.


From Blog – Hackaday via this RSS feed



Immigration advocates alarmed over detention of DACA recipient: ‘No legal basis’


Border patrol agents arrested Catalina Santiago, granted temporary protection as a Dreamer, on 3 August

Catalina “Xochitl” Santiago had already made it past the security line at the El Paso airport when two border patrol agents called her in for questioning and whisked her away to an immigration detention center.

Nearly a month after her arrest, she and her family still aren’t clear why she is detained. Santiago is a beneficiary of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (Daca) program – which has allowed her to legally live and work in the US.

“They have no legal basis for why they detained her or why they’re holding her or why they’re trying to deport her,” said her spouse, Desiree Miller. And immigration officials have yet to provide her or her family any clear answers, she added.



T-Rex Burger


Is there really a target market for this abomination?
(TikTok screencap)
in reply to oplkill

Last time I replied to a comment here my comment got deleted for violating "be civil' rule. I'm going to violate again and tell you.. Are you really this dumb? Cant you comprehend what people mean when they say free healthcare you muppet?

P.s. Mods: are you going to implement a "don't say dumb things" rule ? Why do we have to be civil against obvious empty buckets for brains?

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 settimane fa)


youtuber impazziti cancellan la roba e l’octopiangiaggio inizia di nuovo!


Ma cos’è ‘sta storia assurda e ricorrente che gli youtuber dal niente (anche se oddio, forse non proprio dal niente a questo punto) prendono e diventano schizoidi, facendo sparire (a volte cancellando, forse altre mettendo il privato, boh) i loro video? E, precisamente, non tutti i video, e nemmeno i video più vecchi, ma in […]

octospacc.altervista.org/2025/…


youtuber impazziti cancellan la roba e l’octopiangiaggio inizia di nuovo!


Ma cos’è ‘sta storia assurda e ricorrente che gli youtuber dal niente (anche se oddio, forse non proprio dal niente a questo punto) prendono e diventano schizoidi, facendo sparire (a volte cancellando, forse altre mettendo il privato, boh) i loro video? E, precisamente, non tutti i video, e nemmeno i video più vecchi, ma in special modo quelli relativamente più nuovi. Si, solo negli youtuber (o forse, negli influencer audiovisivi tutti, ma io consumo solo youtube, perché solo lì c’è roba elaborata) vedo questo comportamento… non nei blogger, non negli sviluppatori open source (quelli fanno di molto peggio); non capisco. 🥴

Ma succede davvero da un giorno all’altro, eh… cos’è, alla sera vanno bene, come sono andati bene per mesi, e alla mattina dopo invece non più? E questa non è solo un’ipotesi, bensì ho la certezza che sia così: con il fatto che uso un aggregatore di feed RSS per tenere le mie iscrizioni di YouTube, se lo youtuber cancella o nasconde i video più recenti, quelli più vecchi (che altrimenti sarebbero oltre il limite di elementi) ecco che risalgono in cima, e io li vedo come se fossero nuovi (anche se in effetti non so perché in FreshRSS appaiano con una data e ora recente, anziché con quella di pubblicazione originale… meglio per me, così mi accorgo delle magagne semplicemente scrollando normalmente). 👹

Sarò io che ho tra le iscrizioni troppi youtuber schizofrenici, o è fisiologico che su circa un migliaio ce ne debba essere almeno qualcuno particolare? La cosa strana è che in genere questo avviene comunque di rado… e invece, temo purtroppo che anche in questo ora ci sia qualcosa sotto, perché ho appena visto questa cosa succedere con ben 2 youtuber a distanza di proprio pochi giorni: 3 giorni fa ho notato che il fu YouTube Fa Cagare ha attuato la rimozione coatta di tutti i video degli ultimi 5-6 anni, e stamattina invece noto che Hiding In My Room pure ha fatto la sua solita pulizia varia (si, in effetti di lui non mi stupisco, ma rimane la goccia che oggi ha fatto traboccare il fritto misto). 😾
Non parliamo nemmeno di come il secondo tizio (…che in foto è a sinistra, e non a destra come dovrebbe essere logico, perché sono purtroppo una frana), tra i tanti video cancellati, abbia lasciato al proprio posto una quantità sospetta di recensioni tutte rigorosamente negative di vari prodotti — e sono abbastanza sicura che di Switch 2 ne avesse parlato bene o almeno neutralmente, ma invece c’è solo un video “VERY disappointing…“, figuriamoci…
Però bah, questa cosa non la gradisco, ‘un mi garba, serve una soluzione definitiva!!! Ovviamente non posso scaricarmi tutti i video di cui normalmente salverei un semplice link (…ci ho provato in passato, e scaricando in 720p VP9/AV1 ho riempito un disco da 320 GB in appena qualche mese)… Però, come dire… si da il caso che io mesi fa avessi trovato per caso un metodo efficace per salvare video di YouTube sull’Internet Archive, a differenza del “salva pagina ora” che non ha mai funzionato, quindi… La soluzione è smettere di usare dei normali segnalibri (nel mio caso, Shiori, non i merdosi del browser) per salvare i video, e invece usare un blog su WordPress.org semplicemente embeddando i video; la magia automatica del web farà il resto, dietro le quinte!!! 😈

#lost #media #youtuber #youtubers




“These were not negotiations”


Arnaud Bertrand

This is extraordinary. For the many of you who wonder how the EU could agree to such a humiliating "deal" with Trump, wonder no more.

We have an unusually straightforward answer directly from the horse's mouth: Sabine Weyand, who's the Directorate-General for Trade at the EU commission.

As she puts its:
- "If you didn't hear me say the word 'negotiation' – that's because there wasn't one." => the U.S. dictated the terms
- "From the Commission's perspective, this was a strategic compromise, not an ideal economic solution" => they're aware this completely f*cks the EU economically
- "The European side was under massive pressure to find a quick solution to stabilize transatlantic relations – especially with regard to security guarantees" => the EU agreed to the "deal" under a protection racket
- "We have a land war on the European continent. And we are completely dependent on the United States. The member states were not prepared to take the risk of further escalation – that would have been the consequence of European countermeasures." => Europe acted out of fear, choosing economic submission because of its total dependence on the U.S. (which ironically will only worsen the dependence)

There you have it, she said the quiet part out loud: the EU is in such a terrible strategic situation and EU leaders have so little courage that they're unable and unwilling to say 'no' to even the most humiliating demands.

xcancel.com/RnaudBertrand/stat…



#qualedistribuzioneperchicomincia


Quale distribuzione è meglio per chi vuole iniziare ad usare Linux e non ne capisce nulla?
Il dual boot, è una cosa saggia?

reshared this

in reply to Andre123

sì, win! principalmente qualcosa che renda indolore la cosa
in reply to MrDonz

Beh le tre che ho citato, soprattutto Mint, dovrebbe rendere il meno difficle possibile il cambiamento. Frequenta il forum di Linux Mint, troverai moltissimi consigli, tutorial ecc.



Do Any of You Guys Have Ideas for an Open Source Political Party?


I have been brainstorming an Open Source Political Party. Its probably the only way the entire earth isnt going to be ruined by corporations and dumb people.

Some ideas,

A digital voting framework, no rich canidates allowed.

Transparent online interviews, instead of debates, have a topic of the week.

A summery of peoples positions before the election.

--Some first policies--

Get rid of most laws and taxes, have a simple flat tax on everyone that is the same.

Replace our currency with a metal based currency with no fixed value by law.

Trans rights and Expanding the Constitution to limit the types of laws other politicians can pass if they are antihuman, antiliberty.

Reimaging some systems like healthcare and education for the 21st century and beyond.

Informing juries of their right to nullify the legal process

Forcing transparency in the state, passing privacy laws and protections.

Scientific funding for some ideas, like helping trans people to get better treatment and also have children. Taking half of tax revenues and giving it back to people in UBI. Creating a defensive military instead of an imperial one. Giving children more rights. Expanding schools into bording schools where students have a right to pick their school and live there if they want to escape abusive parents.

Bottom up governments, top down civil rights enforcment and dispute settling and managing of resources.

Getting rid of property tax for most people, only taxing property when someone or an entity owns multiple properties. No spamming to het around the tax.

Creating an opensource free internet infastructure and a free digital low bandwidth per user national digital radio network.

Right to repair and hack your devices. Full ownership of most devices. People cannot sell you partial ownership and puppet you through restrictive contracts, but still have protrctions for intellectual property. All devices must have open bootloaders or unlockable bootloaders. People cannot monopolize things like the radio chips and stuff to keep out competition and control the telecomunications infastructure by forcing people to only use apple and android devices which are full of spyware and adware and dont have root access to the hardware.

What do you guys think? Any ideas? Anyone want to maybe meet once a week on discord to start planing out the platform?

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 settimane fa)

Technology reshared this.



Consigli per un DynDNS provider EU o magari italiano (e comunque non criminale)?


Sto iniziando a giocare con un vecchio laptop sciacallato dal lavoro su cui ho installato ubuntu server, con Nextcloud e Docker.

Con Docker Compose ho installato Nginx e adesso vorrei provare a fare la cosa del DDNS su un dominio che ho registrato presso un provider italiano.

Ho guardato a un po' di provider e mi sembrano essere tutti americani o comunque su infrastruttura americana (DuckDNS su AWS, etc)

C'è qualcuno che mi consigliate nostrano o comunque EU e che abbia in generale una buona reputazione?

reshared this



in reply to IsaamoonKHGDT_6143

OK, I'll need some explanation because I don't fully understand what is being explained in the article.
in reply to Daerun

Microsoft made some database software called DocumentDB (which utilizes a kind of database system called NoSQL) that the Linux Foundation is now accepting into their list of projects they support. This was done because, unlike others like MongoDB, this one called DocumentDB was released under a license that people can use without certain restrictions that MongoDB put inside their license.

The core issue is that big tech companies regularly take software developed by open source devs and then use it for their big money machines without giving anything back to the original developers. MongoDB was fed up with this and started using a license that forces companies to publicize the code of the projects they use MongoDB for. Big Tech doesnt like that, because they really like money and not sharing how they make that money.

"Today, the market has spoken," Farkas wrote on Tuesday. "The Linux Foundation has announced the adoption of the DocumentDB project to create an open standard with MongoDB compatibility, the exact thing we were sued for earlier this year."


So now they have a software suite that people can use to replace their MongoDB systems.

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 settimane fa)
in reply to unexposedhazard

But MongoDB had an AGPL license. Why did they decide to change to a more restrictive one?
in reply to MCasq_qsaCJ_234

According to the company: mongodb.com/company/newsroom/p…

Unfortunately, once an open source project becomes interesting, it is too easy for cloud vendors who have not developed the software to capture all of the value while contributing little back to the community


They are totally morally correct imo, but reality simply doesnt work like that. If you disallow free use of your software for commercial purposes, it will simply die.
They also just spent a bit too much money on a single project from what it look like.

“We have invested approximately $300M in R&D over the past decade to offer a modern, general purpose, open source database for everyone. With the added protection of the SSPL, we can continue to invest in R&D and further drive innovation and value for the community.”


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MongoDB

MongoDB has been removed from the Debian, Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux distributions because of the licensing change. Fedora determined that the SSPL version 1 is not a free software license because it is "intentionally crafted to be aggressively discriminatory" towards commercial users.
Questa voce è stata modificata (2 settimane fa)
in reply to MCasq_qsaCJ_234

MongoDB was never about open source but about making money. 10+ years ago they were trying to market their JSON store as capable of anything when it could not even handle objects larger than 64 MB: yeah I know you use collections not nesting but try to aggregate complex data without constantly working around that limit.

The fact that it still exists when there are alternatives that are faster and more efficient amazes me.

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 settimane fa)
in reply to Daerun

The 'traditional' way of storing a database is on a mainframe or supercomputer, where all the information is stored in tables with the information all uniquely stored, frequently containing id references to other tables. For instance, an 'orders' table would have a customer id in it, and the 'customer' table would have their name and address. The programming language for databases like that is SQL - PostGres and Oracle are examples. That model gives you a lot of advantages - the data is always consistent, changes are either made completely or not at all - but every query has to go through one machine, so performance can suck, and you waste a lot of time 'joining' tables together for certain kinds of query.

If you're storing eg. a blog with comments on it, that model doesn't make sense. Each page has a varied selection of comments, comment will have a username and maybe their icon, which will rarely change, but will need to be evaluated by the database every time. It would make more sense to output the pre-rendered page as a JSON blob, and you could have a hundred machines with a few pages each to share the load. Updating people's icons and adding new comments would need to be done by telling each machine to make a certain update if they've a copy of that page; you'd 'eventually' be consistent, but if you don't care about that then you get a very scalable robust solution quite cheaply. Examples of such 'NoSQL' databases are MongoDB, Hadoop and DocumentDB.

Linux foundation have looked at DocumentDB's license and said 'yes, free enough for us', so they'll adopt it.

in reply to addie

tl;dr: MongoDB is Web Scale.
in reply to Daerun

Mongo DB popularized the "document DB" model which is just storing JSON in a database and offering a way to interact with it roughly like you would data in a traditional relational DB.

7ish years ago, they got fed up with the major cloud providers offering their free software as a service and changed their license to one that is more restrictive.

Of course this is sort of the inevitable outcome: a cloud provider builds a competing product and then "open sources" it in a way that will allow them to grab mind share and eventually erode the company that dared to demand compensation for a "free" product.

Microsoft added a middle finger by announcing it just before mongo released quarterly financials too.

in reply to Daerun

DocumentDB is a NoSQL-ish database implementation built on PostgreSQL that has been accepted by the Linux Foundation. It was created by Microsoft (under MIT license) in response to MongoDB's more restrictive licensing.

Time will tell what adoption is like or if Mongo will change it's licensing to be more permissive.

in reply to h54

If MongoDB changes its license back to AGPL it will be another comedy like Redis
in reply to h54

The best option I see for MongoDB is for In-Q-Tel (CIA) or the government to acquire the company.
in reply to IsaamoonKHGDT_6143

TL;DR « Microsoft began developing DocumentDB in 2024 as a set of PostgreSQL extensions »

I can’t help but think : what could go wrong ? 🙄



in reply to jenesaisquoi

Ich weiß. Wütend macht es mich trotzdem und ich bin eine Person die glaubt, dass Menschen in der Lage sind ihre Meinungen zu ändern, weshalb ich mit solchen Leuten dann auch mal gerne mehr interagieren, als vielleicht für mich gut ist.
in reply to da_cow (she/her)

Mach dir bewusst dass du Meinungen in einem Gespräch immer nur ein Stück ändern kannst, von starker Ablehnung zu schwacher Ablehnung zum Beispiel. Das ist erstmal frustrierend, lässt dich aber kleine Erfolge mehr wertschätzen. Und vielleicht startest du einen Denkprozess, dessen Ende du gar nicht mehr mitbekommst.

reshared this



in reply to solo

Just found a relevant site for the US, called:

Methane Risk Map

Tracking methane-linked health risks to communities.
Questa voce è stata modificata (2 settimane fa)
in reply to solo

Toxic chemicals?! But those have been shown to cause cancer in the state of California!!


Authors celebrate “historic” settlement coming soon in Anthropic class action


A class-action lawsuit against AI company Anthropic over copyright infringement is nearing settlement, with both parties reaching an agreement in principle1. The lawsuit, filed by authors Andrea Bartz, Kirk Wallace Johnson, and Charles Graeber, alleged Anthropic illegally downloaded millions of books to train its AI models2.

U.S. District Judge William Alsup certified what could be the largest copyright class action ever, potentially including up to 7 million claimants1. The lawsuit claimed Anthropic pirated books from online sources including Books3, Library Genesis, and Pirate Library Mirror2.

"This historic settlement will benefit all class members," said Justin A. Nelson, attorney for the authors1. The parties must file a motion for preliminary approval by September 5, 20251.

While settlement terms remain undisclosed, the case had serious implications - industry advocates warned that if every eligible author filed a claim, it could "financially ruin" the AI industry1. Anthropic had previously argued the lawsuit threatened its survival as a company1.


  1. Ars Technica - Authors celebrate "historic" settlement coming soon in Anthropic class action ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
  2. LA Times - AI company Anthropic settles with authors who alleged piracy ↩︎ ↩︎

Technology reshared this.

in reply to Zerush

Fuck copyright. I don't think individuals should have to pay - even with their private data - to access information, and that means companies shouldn't either. Especially ones providing a public service to people with open weights AI models.
in reply to TheLeadenSea

Research and study material should absolutely not be gated to benefit everyone. But recreational pieces should absolutely be protected.
Questa voce è stata modificata (2 settimane fa)
in reply to SSUPII

should not be gated

should be protected


Insidious language to imply people who restrict one type of information is bad and anti humanity, while restricting information you classify as 'recreational' - that still provides educational background, cultural identity, a sense of shared community and media with friends, and that is literally out of reach for many poor people in first world countries or most people in third world countries, that do not have libraries, or the funds to buy books and videos - or even the devices to play videos on - no, it's 'protecting' the poor rich billionaire authors who live in their mansions because they wrote a book about a wizard they don't want people to read without giving them even more money to attack trans people with.

in reply to TheLeadenSea

There are many indie authors that would lose their only income. I am thinking about these people. Do you really think it is fair for them?
Questa voce è stata modificata (2 settimane fa)
in reply to TheLeadenSea

In a world where people require money to survive, copyright protections ensure writing and other arts remain a realistic (if rarely profitable) activity for those without the luxury of complete financial independence and a wealth of spare time.
Questa voce è stata modificata (2 settimane fa)
in reply to TheLeadenSea

I don't think individuals should have to pay - even with their private data


Agree.

[...] and that means companies shouldn't either.


Disagree.

Whn a person pirates, they usually do it for a) themselves, b) their family or c) a close friend. Some might share on a larger basis.

And other than that, they also usually use it for a) educational or b) entertainment purposes.

For companies, it's alsmost always d) On a larger basis and c) commercially.

As most licences and contracts differentiate the two uses, so should the law.

The fact that I can download a book online and read it (sneakily, and technically illegally) doesn't mean that if I became an AI LLC I could download it, along with thousands of others, to then sell as my AI's "knowledge".

Making that an AI's knowledge is "storing in a retrieval system" and commercial use isn't a free use criterion.

The true problem with (common law) copyright is the fact that it can be bought and sold. Or rather, the author doesn't own it - the publisher does. Which goes against the initial idea of the author getting dividends from their works.



2025: 6 anni di PlusBrothers


26 agosto 2019: i PlusBrothers sono nati come scherzo in un gruppo ristretto su Facebook ma poi l’entusiasmo ci ha portato a valorizzarli come vero esercizio di #scrittura creativa.

I primi anni però abbiamo pubblicato le nostre ispirazioni in modo casuale, senza curarci di quanto senso potessero avere le singole storie.

Ora invece il blog multilingua e il #fediverso ci costringono a fare ordine perché non possiamo continuare a comportarci come se chi legge conoscesse già tutto di noi.

Cancellare le vecchie storie? Non esiste, creiamo l’arcHIVio, lo lasciamo pubblico, e ricominciamo da capo. Il virus senziente ha diritto di presentarsi e partecipare ai nuovi social network decentralizzati al pari (e meglio) degli umani.

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 settimane fa)

in reply to Davriellelouna

It's times like this I wonder about the like/dislike paradigm I.E. "I like/dislike knowing this and/or appreciate the perceived reputability of the source" vs. "This is good news/I fucking hate this."

This one just got a "I fucking hate this" from me.

in reply to wuphysics87

More of the first, but not exactly. It's "Other people should see and know about this too" and "This isn't worth anybody's time/is factually wrong and shouldn't have been posted."

Because that's what upvoting does, makes it higher in the page so more people are able to see it.

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)


29. August 2025, 15:00:00 UTC - GMT - Donau Vista Würstel Club, 3422, Sankt Andrä-Wördern, Österreich
Ago 29
Donau Vista Sunset Club
Ven 17:00 - 18:00
Donau Vista Würstel Club (inoffiziell)

Langsam wird’s später im Sommer – aber noch lange nicht leiser.


Diesmal übernehmen Ursula, Gümix und Andreas Weisz die musikalische Regie,
 und vertonen den Sonnenuntergang und die Nacht mit organischen Beats und satten Bässen.

Der Altarm leuchtet, der Bass rollt, der Abend gehört euch.

Eintritt frei = Spende willkommen. Wer kann, der gibt – wer nicht kann, tanzt trotzdem mit.

Kommen, lauschen, treiben lassen.



Donald Trump's 50% tariff on India kicks in as PM Modi urges self-reliance


The US president's steep 50% tariffs on India have kicked in, sending Narendra Modi's government into firefighting mode.


Archived version: archive.is/20250827045217/bbc.…


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.




FCC cracks down on robocalls: 1,200 voice service providers axed


The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has axed 1,200 voice service providers from the US phone network for failing to meet the rules protecting users from malicious and illegal calls, known as robocalls.

The removal from the Robocall Mitigation Database (RMD) means that all other voice service and intermediate providers must cease accepting all calls directly from the companies that do not meet the requirements.

https://cybernews.com/security/fcc-axes-1200-voice-providers-over-robocalls/



FCC cracks down on robocalls: 1,200 voice service providers axed


The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has axed 1,200 voice service providers from the US phone network for failing to meet the rules protecting users from malicious and illegal calls, known as robocalls.

The removal from the Robocall Mitigation Database (RMD) means that all other voice service and intermediate providers must cease accepting all calls directly from the companies that do not meet the requirements.

https://cybernews.com/security/fcc-axes-1200-voice-providers-over-robocalls/






Parental controls on children’s tech devices are out of touch with child’s play


The "protection of children" has been the cited reason for a lot of controversial laws and measures recently. A common response is that parents should use parental controls to manage that on their own instead of relying on the government to do it to everyone. I found this article interesting since it touched on how the existing tools aren't that good, and addressing that problem might be a better thing to focus on

Authors:

  • Sara M. Grimes | Wolfe Chair in Scientific and Technological Literacy and Professor, McGill University
  • Riley McNair | PhD Student in Information Studies, University of Toronto

Technology reshared this.

in reply to Otter Raft

force binary choices that don’t align with household rules or with children’s maturity levels.


This has been my main experience with "parental controls". As soon as they are turned on, I lose any ability to manage the experiences available to my children. So, in areas where I see them as mature enough to handle something, the only way I can allow them access to that experience is to completely bypass the controls. In many ecosystems, if I judge that one of my children could handle a game and the online risks associated with it, I can't simply allow that game. Instead, I need to maintain a full adult account for them to use. You also run into a lot of situations where the reason a game is banned from children is unclear or done in an obvious "better safe than sorry" knee-jerk reaction. Ultimately, parental controls end up being far more frustrating than empowering. I'd rather just have something that just says, "this game/movie/etc your kid is asking for is restricted based on reasons X, Y and Z. Do you want to allow it?" Log my response and go with it. Like damned near any choice in software settings, quit trying to out-think me on what I want, give me a choice and respect that choice.

in reply to Otter Raft

How about not letting children near screens? Yeah, let's be looked at as the Amish kid that got transfered, but this genuinely feels like the right choice. Maybe allow something like Wikipedia/encyclopedia in someway.


Parental controls on children’s tech devices are out of touch with child’s play


The "protection of children" has been the cited reason for a lot of controversial laws and measures recently. A common response is that parents should use parental controls to manage that on their own instead of relying on the government to do it to everyone. I found this article interesting since it touched on how the existing tools aren't that good, and addressing that problem might be a better thing to focus on

Authors:

  • Sara M. Grimes | Wolfe Chair in Scientific and Technological Literacy and Professor, McGill University
  • Riley McNair | PhD Student in Information Studies, University of Toronto

Technology reshared this.



Barley wine


Just a heavy mash with some chocolate malt and crystal, brittish yeast BRT101 (RIP Alzymologist Oy, but I still have the Library). Takes time to mature, couple weeks after bottling it still asks for more bottle aging (hopefully few years) but already nice and mellow. Dangerously drinkable, for its ABV.
in reply to tasankovasara

8kg pale

0.7kg crystal medium

0.3kg crystal oak

0.5kg chocolate

0.5kg torrified wheat

final volume 15L

Utilization could be better, but that's zen approach we are trying - literally only large kitchen kettles and colander, I'll make a post about this idea later. It works, but not so good on heavy stuff. But then fancy equipment doesn't work with this well either (actually often worse). Heavy mashes are not so simple.

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 settimane fa)
in reply to Alexander

10 kg into 15 L, that's a malt-head's dream brew 😀

I'm at the initial dreaming state of building a 'kuurna', the preferred sahti mashing process. That would be the way to optimise utilisation. I already have a stainless steel piece that would probably work as a base. No use building it though, no room in the house to set up the process or really even store it...