One of the biggest challenges in tech education today is moving from theory to hands-on projects. While platforms like GitHub, Codecademy, and Coursera cover tutorials and collaboration, a new category is quietly emerging: project marketplaces.

Some early attempts include:

GitHub Marketplace – extensions, tools, and templates developers can buy.

Codementor & MentorCruise – pairing mentorship with guided coding.

Udemy Project Courses – teaching via real project breakdowns.

The vision is clear:

Beginners could buy projects to dissect and learn from.

With mentorship, they could build their own skills faster.

Eventually, they could sell projects themselves, creating a self-sustaining loop.

This raises key questions for the tech community:

Could project marketplaces reduce the “experience gap” in tech hiring?

How do we balance learning value vs. copy-paste risks?

Will they complement open-source collaboration, or compete with it?

As hiring becomes more portfolio-driven, it will be interesting to see if these marketplaces evolve into a serious part of the developer ecosystem.

A growing challenge for students and early-career developers is bridging the gap between theory and practical, portfolio-ready projects. While platforms exist for tutorials, freelancing, and open-source, a new concept is gaining traction: project marketplaces.

The idea is simple:

Learners can purchase real, working projects to study and build upon.

Mentorship or guided learning helps them understand the “why” behind the code.

Skilled users can then resell their own projects, creating a cycle of learning and contribution.

This approach sits at the intersection of edtech, peer-to-peer marketplaces, and open-source collaboration. It raises some important questions:

How can such marketplaces ensure quality control and originality?

Could they become a bridge for students with little project experience to gain confidence?

Or would they risk encouraging dependency rather than skill-building?

With the demand for practical, job-ready experience growing, it will be interesting to see whether project marketplaces become a legitimate part of the tech ecosystem — or just a passing experiment.

In the tech world, aspiring developers often face the same roadblock: “How do I build real-world projects and gain experience if I don’t already have skills or opportunities?”

Traditional coding bootcamps and online courses try to fill this gap, but they don’t always provide the hands-on project exposure or mentorship that’s needed to feel job-ready.

Now imagine a platform that works differently:

Developers could buy real projects (with code + documentation) to study and learn from.

Educators and mentors could teach by dissecting those projects step-by-step.

And once learners level up, they could sell their own projects on the same marketplace — turning the cycle into a self-sustaining ecosystem.

This approach combines project-based learning, mentorship, and a marketplace model.

🔹 Do you think such a platform could realistically work in today’s developer ecosystem?
🔹 Or would it face the same challenges as other edtech/startup models?

I’d love to hear what this community thinks — is this an idea worth exploring, or just another passing trend?

I’ve been thinking about the gap between learning theory and building real-world projects.
What if there was a platform where:

You could buy practical, real-world projects to learn from

Mentorship was included, guiding you through the project
**
And once you gain confidence, you could **sell your own projects back on the platform

This could create a cycle of learning → building → teaching → earning .
Do you think something like this would actually gain traction in the tech world, or would people not find it useful?

What would make such a platform truly valuable for developers, learners, and mentors?

https://www.axios.com/2025/08/30/workers-over-billionaires-protests-trump-labor-day

cross-posted from: programming.dev/post/36549166

Pro

2025-08-29 22:28:58

California Gov. Gavin Newsom and lawmakers strike a deal with Uber and Lyft allowing drivers to unionize while remaining classified as independent contractors

Governor Newsom, Pro Tem McGuire, Speaker Rivas announce support for legislation empowering gig workers, improving rideshare affordability | Governor of California

State of California

^{marissasaldivar (Governor of California)}

There's an effort underway to form a Fediverse Club at Georgia Tech, to bring together students, staff and faculty interested in the Fediverse:

sites.gatech.edu/eprodromou3/2…

::: spoiler Comments
- Hackernews.
:::

In July 2021, a sudden drop in Tor usage in Turkmenistan called our attention. Tor would come to understand that this marked the beginning of a new era of censorship and restriction in this post-Soviet country. But let's rewind...

The Tor Community has long been defending internet freedom, running relays and providing bridges to combat internet censorship.

Over the years, the Tor Project has called for action to run more bridges, Snowflake proxies, while we've investigated and adapted our anti-censorship strategies, and shared information about online censorship in Turkmenistan.

Modern censorship circumvention systems are generally built around the concept of "collateral damage", where a censor cannot block access without blocking the entire internet or popular online services. However, in Turkmenistan, the censors' behavior has been strikingly different. They have openly blocked vast parts of the internet without concern for the collateral consequences, sparking curiosity: why do Turkmenistan's censors seem unbothered by the collateral damage their actions cause?

Corruption and Control: How Turkmenistan turned internet censorship into a business | Tor Project

In Turkmenistan, one of the most isolated regimes in the world, internet censorship has evolved beyond surveillance and control.

^{blog.torproject.org}