Salta al contenuto principale



[JS Required] Google Fined 2.95-billion-euro ($3.45 billion) by EU Over Ad-Tech Business


cross-posted from: programming.dev/post/36929877

Google abused its power by favouring its own online display advertising technology services to the detriment of its competitors, online advertisers and publishers.

As a result of Google's illegal practices, advertisers faced higher marketing costs which they likely passed on to European consumers in the form of higher prices for products and services. Google's tactics also reduced revenues for publishers, which may have led to lower service quality and higher subscription costs for consumers.

Google's abusive behaviour therefore had a negative impact on all European citizens in their day-to-day use of the web.

This is illegal under EU competition rules and therefore our decision orders Google to pay a fine of €2.95 billion.

In line with our usual practice, we increased Google's fine since this is the third time Google breaks the rules of the game. But a mere fine in this case is not enough to deliver real and tangible solutions for the market and to protect our consumers.

This is why we have also ordered Google to stop its illegal practices and to put an end to its inherent conflict of interests in the Adtech industry.

Google has 60 days to inform the Commission on how it plans to do so, and if it fails to propose a viable plan, the Commission will not hesitate to impose an appropriate remedy.

At this stage, it appears that the only way for Google to end its conflict of interest effectively is with a structural remedy, such as selling some part of its Adtech business.




[JS Required] Google Fined 2.95-billion-euro ($3.45 billion) by EU Over Ad-Tech Business


::: spoiler Comments
- Hacker News.
:::

Google abused its power by favouring its own online display advertising technology services to the detriment of its competitors, online advertisers and publishers.

As a result of Google's illegal practices, advertisers faced higher marketing costs which they likely passed on to European consumers in the form of higher prices for products and services. Google's tactics also reduced revenues for publishers, which may have led to lower service quality and higher subscription costs for consumers.

Google's abusive behaviour therefore had a negative impact on all European citizens in their day-to-day use of the web.

This is illegal under EU competition rules and therefore our decision orders Google to pay a fine of €2.95 billion.

In line with our usual practice, we increased Google's fine since this is the third time Google breaks the rules of the game. But a mere fine in this case is not enough to deliver real and tangible solutions for the market and to protect our consumers.

This is why we have also ordered Google to stop its illegal practices and to put an end to its inherent conflict of interests in the Adtech industry.

Google has 60 days to inform the Commission on how it plans to do so, and if it fails to propose a viable plan, the Commission will not hesitate to impose an appropriate remedy.

At this stage, it appears that the only way for Google to end its conflict of interest effectively is with a structural remedy, such as selling some part of its Adtech business.



Questa voce è stata modificata (18 ore fa)


[JS Required] Google Fined 2.95-billion-euro ($3.45 billion) by EU Over Ad-Tech Business


cross-posted from: programming.dev/post/36929877

Google abused its power by favouring its own online display advertising technology services to the detriment of its competitors, online advertisers and publishers.

As a result of Google's illegal practices, advertisers faced higher marketing costs which they likely passed on to European consumers in the form of higher prices for products and services. Google's tactics also reduced revenues for publishers, which may have led to lower service quality and higher subscription costs for consumers.

Google's abusive behaviour therefore had a negative impact on all European citizens in their day-to-day use of the web.

This is illegal under EU competition rules and therefore our decision orders Google to pay a fine of €2.95 billion.

In line with our usual practice, we increased Google's fine since this is the third time Google breaks the rules of the game. But a mere fine in this case is not enough to deliver real and tangible solutions for the market and to protect our consumers.

This is why we have also ordered Google to stop its illegal practices and to put an end to its inherent conflict of interests in the Adtech industry.

Google has 60 days to inform the Commission on how it plans to do so, and if it fails to propose a viable plan, the Commission will not hesitate to impose an appropriate remedy.

At this stage, it appears that the only way for Google to end its conflict of interest effectively is with a structural remedy, such as selling some part of its Adtech business.




[JS Required] Google Fined 2.95-billion-euro ($3.45 billion) by EU Over Ad-Tech Business


::: spoiler Comments
- Hacker News.
:::

Google abused its power by favouring its own online display advertising technology services to the detriment of its competitors, online advertisers and publishers.

As a result of Google's illegal practices, advertisers faced higher marketing costs which they likely passed on to European consumers in the form of higher prices for products and services. Google's tactics also reduced revenues for publishers, which may have led to lower service quality and higher subscription costs for consumers.

Google's abusive behaviour therefore had a negative impact on all European citizens in their day-to-day use of the web.

This is illegal under EU competition rules and therefore our decision orders Google to pay a fine of €2.95 billion.

In line with our usual practice, we increased Google's fine since this is the third time Google breaks the rules of the game. But a mere fine in this case is not enough to deliver real and tangible solutions for the market and to protect our consumers.

This is why we have also ordered Google to stop its illegal practices and to put an end to its inherent conflict of interests in the Adtech industry.

Google has 60 days to inform the Commission on how it plans to do so, and if it fails to propose a viable plan, the Commission will not hesitate to impose an appropriate remedy.

At this stage, it appears that the only way for Google to end its conflict of interest effectively is with a structural remedy, such as selling some part of its Adtech business.



Questa voce è stata modificata (18 ore fa)


[JS Required] Google Fined $3.5 Billion by EU Over Ad-Tech Business


cross-posted from: programming.dev/post/36929877


[JS Required] Google Fined 2.95-billion-euro ($3.45 billion) by EU Over Ad-Tech Business


::: spoiler Comments
- Hacker News.
:::

Google abused its power by favouring its own online display advertising technology services to the detriment of its competitors, online advertisers and publishers.

As a result of Google's illegal practices, advertisers faced higher marketing costs which they likely passed on to European consumers in the form of higher prices for products and services. Google's tactics also reduced revenues for publishers, which may have led to lower service quality and higher subscription costs for consumers.

Google's abusive behaviour therefore had a negative impact on all European citizens in their day-to-day use of the web.

This is illegal under EU competition rules and therefore our decision orders Google to pay a fine of €2.95 billion.

In line with our usual practice, we increased Google's fine since this is the third time Google breaks the rules of the game. But a mere fine in this case is not enough to deliver real and tangible solutions for the market and to protect our consumers.

This is why we have also ordered Google to stop its illegal practices and to put an end to its inherent conflict of interests in the Adtech industry.

Google has 60 days to inform the Commission on how it plans to do so, and if it fails to propose a viable plan, the Commission will not hesitate to impose an appropriate remedy.

At this stage, it appears that the only way for Google to end its conflict of interest effectively is with a structural remedy, such as selling some part of its Adtech business.



#euro
Questa voce è stata modificata (18 ore fa)


Beleaguered workers at Yosemite and Sequoia & Kings Canyon flock to unionize


Labor organizers have been trying to form a union at the parks for years but did not have the necessary support until this year when the Trump administration’s mass firings left the parks service in turmoil, the Los Angeles Times reported.

“Every day you come to work and you have no idea what is going to happen next. It’s like we are all being subjected to psychological warfare,” a staffer said this spring.

Earlier this year at Yosemite, laid-off employees hung a US flag upside down, a symbol of distress, at the park’s El Capitan to bring attention to the cuts.



'Alligator Auschwitz' immigration centre can stay open, appeals court rules


In a 2-1 ruling, the appellate court in Atlanta, Georgia, granted a request from the state of Florida and the US homeland security department to block a lower court injunction while a lawsuit plays out.

"Alligator Alcatraz is in fact, like we've always said, open for business," said Florida Governor Ron DeSantis.

Last month, US District Judge Kathleen Williams ordered a halt to the facility's expansion and for its dismantling to begin within 60 days.



Hundreds of South Koreans detained in massive ICE raid at Hyundai plant in Georgia


"As of today, it is our understanding that none of those detained is directly employed by Hyundai Motor Company," it said in statement. "We prioritize the safety and well-being of everyone working at the site."

At a press conference on Friday, an official with the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) said "there was a majority of Korean nationals from the 475" people detained.

"They are in the custody of ICE enforcement and removal operations," Special Agent Steve Schrank said, adding that they were taken to a processing facility in Folkston, Georgia.

"They will be moved based on the individual circumstances beyond that," he said. "This in fact was the largest single-site enforcement operation in the history of homeland security investigations."



[JS Required] Google Fined 2.95-billion-euro ($3.45 billion) by EU Over Ad-Tech Business


cross-posted from: programming.dev/post/36929877

Google abused its power by favouring its own online display advertising technology services to the detriment of its competitors, online advertisers and publishers.

As a result of Google's illegal practices, advertisers faced higher marketing costs which they likely passed on to European consumers in the form of higher prices for products and services. Google's tactics also reduced revenues for publishers, which may have led to lower service quality and higher subscription costs for consumers.

Google's abusive behaviour therefore had a negative impact on all European citizens in their day-to-day use of the web.

This is illegal under EU competition rules and therefore our decision orders Google to pay a fine of €2.95 billion.

In line with our usual practice, we increased Google's fine since this is the third time Google breaks the rules of the game. But a mere fine in this case is not enough to deliver real and tangible solutions for the market and to protect our consumers.

This is why we have also ordered Google to stop its illegal practices and to put an end to its inherent conflict of interests in the Adtech industry.

Google has 60 days to inform the Commission on how it plans to do so, and if it fails to propose a viable plan, the Commission will not hesitate to impose an appropriate remedy.

At this stage, it appears that the only way for Google to end its conflict of interest effectively is with a structural remedy, such as selling some part of its Adtech business.




[JS Required] Google Fined 2.95-billion-euro ($3.45 billion) by EU Over Ad-Tech Business


::: spoiler Comments
- Hacker News.
:::

Google abused its power by favouring its own online display advertising technology services to the detriment of its competitors, online advertisers and publishers.

As a result of Google's illegal practices, advertisers faced higher marketing costs which they likely passed on to European consumers in the form of higher prices for products and services. Google's tactics also reduced revenues for publishers, which may have led to lower service quality and higher subscription costs for consumers.

Google's abusive behaviour therefore had a negative impact on all European citizens in their day-to-day use of the web.

This is illegal under EU competition rules and therefore our decision orders Google to pay a fine of €2.95 billion.

In line with our usual practice, we increased Google's fine since this is the third time Google breaks the rules of the game. But a mere fine in this case is not enough to deliver real and tangible solutions for the market and to protect our consumers.

This is why we have also ordered Google to stop its illegal practices and to put an end to its inherent conflict of interests in the Adtech industry.

Google has 60 days to inform the Commission on how it plans to do so, and if it fails to propose a viable plan, the Commission will not hesitate to impose an appropriate remedy.

At this stage, it appears that the only way for Google to end its conflict of interest effectively is with a structural remedy, such as selling some part of its Adtech business.



Questa voce è stata modificata (18 ore fa)

Technology Channel reshared this.



[JS Required] Google Fined 2.95-billion-euro ($3.45 billion) by EU Over Ad-Tech Business


::: spoiler Comments
- Hacker News.
:::

Google abused its power by favouring its own online display advertising technology services to the detriment of its competitors, online advertisers and publishers.

As a result of Google's illegal practices, advertisers faced higher marketing costs which they likely passed on to European consumers in the form of higher prices for products and services. Google's tactics also reduced revenues for publishers, which may have led to lower service quality and higher subscription costs for consumers.

Google's abusive behaviour therefore had a negative impact on all European citizens in their day-to-day use of the web.

This is illegal under EU competition rules and therefore our decision orders Google to pay a fine of €2.95 billion.

In line with our usual practice, we increased Google's fine since this is the third time Google breaks the rules of the game. But a mere fine in this case is not enough to deliver real and tangible solutions for the market and to protect our consumers.

This is why we have also ordered Google to stop its illegal practices and to put an end to its inherent conflict of interests in the Adtech industry.

Google has 60 days to inform the Commission on how it plans to do so, and if it fails to propose a viable plan, the Commission will not hesitate to impose an appropriate remedy.

At this stage, it appears that the only way for Google to end its conflict of interest effectively is with a structural remedy, such as selling some part of its Adtech business.

Questa voce è stata modificata (18 ore fa)

Technology Channel reshared this.



Solarpunk Environment Sketch: Retrofitted Ship Interior


Source.
in reply to stabby_cicada

the point of the Story Seed Library is to simplify the license and openly say "my work can be shared freely on the Internet". Without it, it gets complicated and its not obvious whether I can illustrate a blogpost by just crediting them.

Nothing against works outside of Creative Commons, I just want to build a repository of works we can all use freely 😀

in reply to alxd of the Story Seed Library

I previously reached out to a few artists who created Solarpunk art for games - and the copyright on these is pretty strict :/







475 people taken into ICE custody at Hyundai plant in Georgia


United States immigration authorities have arrested 475 people in a raid on a Hyundai manufacturing site in Georgia, Steve Schrank, a special agent in charge of Homeland Securities Investigations Atlanta, said at a press conference on Friday.

The Hyundai facility, located in Ellabell, Georgia -- approximately 30 miles west of Savannah -- was raided “as part of an ongoing criminal investigation into allegations of unlawful employment practices and other serious federal crimes,” according to a statement from the Department of Homeland Security.



Anime with a high death count that's actually good?


I'm basically looking for anime where any character can die. Usually, most anime with this trope are horrible. I feel like the only good one is Chainsaw Man. Are there any others?
in reply to darkguyman

Gundam handles death really well in my opinion. Specifically the original series, Thunderbolt and Iron-Blooded Orphans.


Two sawwings preening


Two sawwings preening #birding #photography
One od them stopped to check something:


Trump-Appointed Judges Block Order to Shut Down “Alligator Alcatraz”


Two judges appointed to the US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit by President Donald Trump issued a Thursday decision that allows a newly established but already notorious immigrant detention center in Florida, dubbed Alligator Alcatraz, to stay open. Friends of the Everglades, the Center for Biological Diversity, and the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida sought “to halt the unlawful…




DC Statehood: Now, More Than Ever




The Browser Company, maker of Arc and Dia, is being acquired


Mike Cannon-Brookes, the CEO of enterprise software giant Atlassian, was one of the first users of the Arc browser. Over the last several years, he has been a prolific bug reporter and feature requester. Now he’ll own the thing: Atlassian is acquiring The Browser Company, the New York-based startup that makes both Arc and the new AI-focused Dia browser. Atlassian is paying $610 million in cash for The Browser Company, and plans to run it as an independent entity.

The acquisition is mostly about Dia, which launched in June. Dia is a mix of web browser and chatbot, with a built-in way to chat with your tabs but also do things across apps. Open up three spreadsheets in three tabs and Dia can move data between them; log into your Gmail and Dia can tell you what’s next on the calendar. Anything with a URL immediately becomes data available to Dia and its AI models. For a company like Atlassian, which makes a whole suite of work apps — the popular project-tracker Jira, the note-taking app Confluence, plus Trello, Loom, and more — a way to stitch them all together seems obviously compelling.



OpenAI eats jobs, then offers to help you find a new one at Walmart


On Thursday, Fidji Simo, OpenAI's head of applications (and former CEO of Instacart), announced the plan for workers to advertise themselves to the company's customers for new jobs. She said that while AI is going to shake up the employment market, who better to solve that problem than the people doing the shaking?

"AI will be disruptive. Jobs will look different, companies will have to adapt, and all of us – from shift workers to CEOs – will have to learn how to work in new ways," she said in a blog post.

"At OpenAI, we can't eliminate that disruption. But what we can do is help more people become fluent in AI and connect them with companies that need their skills, to give people more economic opportunities."

Simo's plan is that workers should take courses in tech literacy at its OpenAI Academy and then advertise themselves on a forthcoming jobs platform. She said the company has already signed up some big names to the scheme, although maybe the choice of Walmart as an early adopter might not encourage IT admins in their future career paths.

#tech



in reply to silence7

Like, humans knew about global warming, and even the man-made aspect, long before we even had satellites.... getting rid of the satellites doesn't even impact how much proof we have...
in reply to Tarquinn2049

What it does is get rid of our ability to localize who is using the atmosphere as a sewer
in reply to silence7

That's fair, there are other methods, but they are slower and lower "resolution". That is probably the angle.
in reply to silence7

For people who may not know, even a small satellite (not counting starlink's disposable suitcase ones) usually takes 5-10 YEARS to even build at the very minimum. If we were to also include the development, testing, and launch; the time could easily double that.

So, what he's doing is much, much worse; he's trying to create a legacy of destruction that would take multiple generations to even get back to where we were before he got his mealy hands on everything.



Climate change turns Pakistan’s summer oases into deadly flood zones


The mountain retreats where Pakistanis go to escape the stifling summer heat have been inundated this year by floods, another product of climate change.


Access options:
* gift link — registration required
* archive.today



Payrolls rose 22,000 in August, less than expected in further sign of hiring slowdown


KEY POINTS

Nonfarm payrolls increased by just 22,000 for the month, lower than the 75,000 forecast, while the unemployment rate rose to 4.3%.

The report showed a marked slowdown from the July increase of 79,000, which was revised up by 6,000. Revisions also showed a net loss of 13,000 in June.

Health care again led by sectors, adding 31,000 jobs, while social assistance contributed 16,000. Wholesale trade and manufacturing both saw declines of 12,000 on the month.




UC Berkeley’s Rhagobot: Water Strider Robot Harnesses Surface Tension for Speed


Researchers from UC Berkeley, Ajou University, and Georgia Tech unveiled Rhagobot in 2025, a tiny aquatic robot inspired by water striders of the genus Rhagovelia[^1]. The robot features self-deploying fan-like structures on its legs that harness surface tension for propulsion, mimicking the insects' ability to move rapidly across water surfaces[^2].

The 8 cm long robot weighs just 0.2 grams and uses passive fan mechanisms that unfurl in 0.01 seconds without requiring muscle power[^3]. These fans, measuring 10 by 5 mm, enable the robot to achieve speeds of two body lengths per second and execute 90-degree turns in under half a second[^4].

According to Professor Je-Sung Koh from Ajou University, "Our robotic fans self-morph using nothing but water surface forces and flexible geometry, just like their biological counterparts. It is a form of mechanical intelligence refined by nature through millions of years of evolution"[^5].

The breakthrough came from studying the water striders' fan architecture using electron microscopy, which revealed that surface tension alone powers the fan deployment - contrary to previous assumptions about muscle activation[^4]. This passive mechanism reduces power consumption compared to motorized alternatives, making it promising for environmental monitoring and search-and-rescue applications[^3].

[^1]: WebProNews - UC Berkeley's Rhagobot: Water Strider Robot Harnesses Surface Tension for Speed

[^2]: Heise - Inspired by water striders: self-unfolding fans make the 'Rhagobot' agile

[^3]: Future Tech on Instagram

[^4]: New Atlas - Robotic water strider rows itself forward by fanning feathery feet

[^5]: Heise - Inspired by water striders: self-unfolding fans make the 'Rhagobot' agile




DOJ plans to label trans Americans as "mentally defective" to take away their guns


Justice Department leadership is prepared to use its rule-making authority to declare transgender people as mentally ill and deprive them of their Second Amendment right to possess firearms, according to two Justice officials who shared internal discussions with CNN.

Deliberations at the highest levels of the DOJ follow the recent mass shooting at Annunciation Catholic Church in Minneapolis, an attack police say was carried out by a 23-year-old former student at the church’s school who may have been a transgender person or a de-transitioned individual. Two children were killed in the attack, and 21 others were injured.

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2025/09/doj-plans-to-label-trans-americans-as-mentally-defective-to-take-away-their/





Why I Ditched Spotify, and How I Set Up My Own Music Stack | LeshiCodes


For years, I relied on Spotify like millions of others. The convenience was undeniable stream anything, anywhere, discover new music through algorithms, and share playlists with friends. But over time, several issues became impossible to ignore: artists getting paid fractions of pennies per stream, fake Artists and ghost Tracks, AI music and impersonation, creepy age verification complicity and the fact that despite paying monthly, I never actually owned anything. So I decided to take back control of my music experience. Here's how I built my own self-hosted music streaming setup that gives me everything Spotify offered and more.
in reply to BrikoX

I understand the author's intent to support artists by purchasing their music on various platforms, but by using Sabnzbd to download music from Usenet, this is essentially a guide to pirate music. The only thing in this setup that isn't automated is purchasing the albums, and at one point the author says he uses Sabnzbd to download from Bandcamp. No, he doesn't, that's impossible; Sabnzbd is a Usenet client and nothing more.

I applaud the author for trying to be honest and support his favorite artists with legal purchases to justify his use of these apps, and it's a great setup. But let's not pretend that most people following this guide will actually legally purchase any music they download once they see how seamless and fun it is to pirate it.

And I say all of that as someone who has a similar setup with Lidarr and Sabnzbd, I am not judging anyone who chooses to pirate music. And I do purchase actual physical albums of some of the music I download so I can support my favorite artists. I just wanted to call out the author for being a bit disingenuous about his setup.

in reply to kaidenshi

<...> at one point the author says he uses Sabnzbd to download from Bandcamp.


He does? I can't find that reference.



Genitori, la Colpa è Vostra: L'Errore che Facciamo con gli Smartphone


Ricordi quando il cellulare in mano a tuo figlio era motivo di vanto? Oggi, quel vanto si è trasformato in una sfida: come gestire l'uso dello smartphone e dei social. La dura verità è che il problema non sono i giovani, ma l'esempio che noi adulti diamo.
Non servono regole ferree, ma un "patto di famiglia" basato sul buon senso e sull'esempio. Insegnare a vivere offline per vivere meglio anche online è la vera soluzione. Sei pronto a invertire la rotta e a guidare i tuoi figli verso un rapporto sano con la** tecnologia? **


Wikipedia is under attack — and how it can survive




Addio Stress da Rientro: I Segreti per Ritornare in Forma (Adulti e Bambini)


Le vacanze finiscono, e il ritorno alla routine può sembrare una montagna da scalare. Quella sensazione di** stanchezza,** il sonno sfasato e la bilancia impietosa non sono solo sensazioni, ma i sintomi di un vero e proprio "stress da rientro".

Il tuo corpo ha bisogno di essere riabituato, gradualmente, a ritmi regolari. In questo processo, l'alimentazione gioca un ruolo chiave, ma anche piccoli accorgimenti come l'esercizio fisico leggero e la riscoperta di un sonno di qualità sono essenziali.

Vuoi scoprire come affrontare al meglio questa transizione e tornare a sentirti energico e in salute?

reshared this



Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 7th September 2025


Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.


(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)


Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 31st August 2025 - awful.systems


Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.


(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)


in reply to BlueMonday1984

The common clay of the new west:

::: spoiler transcript
ChatGPT has become worthless

[Business & Professional]

I’m a paid member and asked it to help me research a topic and write a guide and it said it needed days to complete it. That’s a first. Usually it could do this task on the spot.

It missed the first deadline and missed 5 more. 3 weeks went by and it couldn’t get the task done. Went to Claude and it did it in 10 minutes. No idea what is going on with ChatGpt but I cancelled the pay plan.

Anyone else having this kind of issue?
:::

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 giorno fa)
in reply to Architeuthis

I am extremely, extremely sickos.png for having all these weird little fucks find out that all this nonsense is heavily subsidised by VCs


La Tua Infiammazione: Amica o Nemica? La Verità Che Non Ti Aspetti!


L'infiammazione **non è sempre da combattere! È il tuo sistema di allarme, il tuo "pronto intervento" contro danni e **infezioni, segnalando con dolore, rossore e calore che qualcosa non va. Esistono diversi tipi di "operai" che la gestiscono, dalla** COX-1** (sempre attiva per la protezione) alla COX-2 (per le emergenze).
Quando è eccessiva, interveniamo con FANS o corticosteroidi, ma non senza effetti collaterali. E se ti dicessi che esiste un "ingegnere" naturale, la** curcumina,** che agisce in modo mirato? Scopri nel nostro articolo completo come funziona l'infiammazione e come gestirla al meglio, senza ignorare i suoi preziosi segnali!
Questa voce è stata modificata (1 giorno fa)

reshared this




L'Oro Giallo della Salute: La Curcuma Tra Tradizione e Scienza


La curcuma non è solo una spezia millenaria, ma un potente alleato per il benessere, grazie al suo principio attivo: la curcumina. **Riscoperta dalla scienza moderna, si è rivelata un eccellente **antinfiammatorio e antiossidante **naturale. Studi scientifici hanno dimostrato che la sua efficacia, in particolare contro l'infiammazione, può essere paragonabile a quella di farmaci comuni come **l'ibuprofene, ma con un profilo di sicurezza superiore.

Tuttavia, il suo assorbimento da parte del corpo è spesso limitato. Per questo, la ricerca ha sviluppato strategie innovative come la combinazione con la piperina o formulazioni avanzate, che ne potenziano l'efficacia.

Vuoi scoprire come integrare al meglio questo "oro giallo" nella tua routine?

reshared this




Trump rebrands Department of Defense as 'Department of War'


Washington (AFP) – President Donald Trump is changing the name of the Department of Defense to the Department of War, the White House announced Thursday, insisting the rebrand will project a more powerful image.

While the department's official name is set in law, Trump in an executive order is authorizing use of the new label as a "secondary title" by his administration, a White House document said.

Defense officials are permitted to use to use "secondary titles such as 'Secretary of War,'...in official correspondence, public communications, ceremonial contexts, and non-statutory documents within the executive branch," according to the document.

It was not immediately clear when Trump planned to sign the order, but his public schedule for Friday said he would be signing executive orders in the afternoon as well as making an announcement in the Oval Office.

The president, a marketing-savvy real estate developer, has repeatedly said in recent weeks that he was mulling such a change.

Late last month, the 79-year-old Republican claimed the Defense Department's title was too "defensive."

The Department of War "was the name when we won World War I, we won World War II, we won everything," he told reporters on August 25.

According to the White House document, the name change "conveys a stronger message of readiness and resolve."

Established in the early days of US independence, the Department of War historically oversaw American land forces.

A government reorganization after World War II brought it along with the US Navy and Air Force under the unified National Military Establishment, which in 1949 was retitled to the Department of Defense.

"Restoring the name 'Department of War' will sharpen the focus of this Department on our national interest and signal to adversaries America's readiness to wage war to secure its interests," the White House document said.

The move is the latest overhaul at the Pentagon since Trump took office in January and appointed former Fox News host Pete Hegseth to lead the sprawling department.

Hegseth, a combat veteran, has repeatedly touted the push to restore a "warrior ethos" in the department, and has lambasted prior administrations for policies he and Trump have derided as "woke."

Hegseth notably has sought to expel transgender troops from the military and change the names of bases that honored Confederate troops back to their original titles, after they were renamed under former president Joe Biden.

While Trump's order could potentially be rescinded by a future president, it "instructs the Secretary of War to recommend actions, to include legislative and executive actions, required to permanently rename" the department, the White House document said.

in reply to xiao

While the change is symbolic, at least it's more honest. US has been waging illegal wars for decades and they never been about defense...
Questa voce è stata modificata (1 giorno fa)


6 Settembre: Luca Blindo esce con “Slow Down”, in anteprima al Premio Lucio Dalla


Il 6 settembre 2025 segna un doppio appuntamento per Luca Blindo: esce infatti il nuovo singolo “Slow Down”, nello stesso giorno, l’artista sarà ospite fuori gara al Premio Lucio Dalla, dove presenterà il brano per la prima volta dal vivo.
Scritto e interpretato da Luca Blindo, con la produzione di Lord Bart, sempre sull’etichetta casertana Hopeland, “Slow Down” è un viaggio introspettivo che affronta il tema della resilienza e della necessità di fermarsi per ritrovare equilibrio e senso. Il testo alterna dialetto napoletano e italiano, creando una narrazione emotiva che si intreccia con sonorità urban e influenze cantautorali, per un’identità musicale originale e personale.
L’anteprima live al Premio Lucio Dalla rappresenta il contesto ideale per il debutto del brano, che racconta una sensibilità contemporanea senza rinunciare alla forza della tradizione musicale italiana.
“Slow Down” accompagnato da un lyrics visual su YouTube, sarà disponibile dal 6 settembre su tutte le piattaforme digitali e in rotazione radiofonica.


Spoti-fire, Stop-ify edo Spoti-fair


Guztiok entzun nahi dugu musika: asko, merke, euskaraz eta gaizki sentitu gabe. Baina Spotify utziko badugu Israelen konplize izateagatik, agian beste enpresa eta tresnen inguruan ere hausnartu beharko dugu. Edo gure morala kontratatzen ditugun zerbitzuen arabera neurtzen hasiko gara? Non geratzen da artista? Eta kultura? Zer balio eraman nahi ditugu beste plataforma batera? Zertarako prest gaude? Galdera asko eta erantzun gutxi.

  1. Testuingurua
  2. Kanpaina
  3. Artistaren papera
  4. Enpresei boikota
  5. Plataforma
  6. Eta gero zer?


Testuingurua


Duela aste batzuk Whatsappeko mezu bat jaso nuen ekimen batera atxikitzeko gonbidapenarekin. “Musikariak Palestinarekin” egitasmoak Spotifyetik gure musika kendu eta boikota egitera animatu gaitu euskal artistoi. Daniel Ek Spotifyeko sortzaileak Israelek Palestina erasotzeko erabiltzen dituen droneak ekoizten dituen enpresa batean inbertsioak egin ostean sorturiko ekimena da. Oso hasieran dago kanpaina, eta oraindik lanean ari dira talde gehiago batu eta komunikazio kanal ofizial bat izateko.

Mezua entzuleari ere iritsi zaio, eta sareetan jendea galdezka antzematen da. “Non gehiago dago euskal musika?”, edo “Nola erraztu aldaketa nirekin plan familiarra partekatzen duen jendeari?”.

Gure musika kontsumo ohiturak, eta zehatzago, gure kultura kontsumitzeko eta sustatzeko ohiturak aldatuko baditugu, zein balio eramango ditugu beste plataforma batera? Zeren baitan aukeratuko dugu plataforma hori? Non jarriko dugu eskubideen neurgailua? Nahikoa zaigu plan familiarra izatea? Gure morala eta lasaitasun mentala kontratatzen ditugun zerbitzuetan neurtuko dugu? Edo euskal musikaren ekosistemari buruz hausnartzeko eta artistak babesteko baliatuko dugu? Spoti-fire emango diogu edo Stop-ify egingo dugu?

Kanpaina


Spotifyetik musika ateratzeko eta boikoteatzeko kanpainarekin bat egiten dugu, eta bertatik gure musika kentzeko lanean ari gara. Baina pertsonalki, baditut beste ezinegon eta zalantza batzuk.

Artistak erantzukizun guztia dauka bere musikarekiko, eta ahal duen neurrian non dagoen kontrolatu beharko luke. Agian, entzuleek ez dakite gaur egun distribuzio digital bidez automatikoki plataforma guztietara igotzen dela musika, baita euskal musika ere. Beraz, alternatiba bilatzea oso erraza da, edozein plataforma “mainstreamean” aurkitzen baita euskal musika.

Hala ere, ezin dugu guztia artistaren esku utzi. Plataformak mugitzen duen dirua erabiltzailearena eta iragarkiena da. Artistok katalogoa kentzen badugu ere, jendeak bertan jarraituko badu, ez dugu ezer lortuko. Aldaketa entzulean izatea behar dugu bereziki.

Artistaren papera


Ez dut eztabaida arazo ekonomikoetara eraman nahi, ez du zentzu askorik artistaren ikuspegitik, horrelako plataformek ez dutelako (normalean behintzat) diru sarrera handirik suposatzen. Baina sareetan eman diren eztabaidetan, jendeak artistaren irabazietan ere oinarritu du plataformaren aldaketa. Eta uste dut honi buruz hitz egiteak ikuspegia zabaldu dezakeela.

Artistak egitura juridiko bat behar du diru sarrerak jaso ahal izateko (edo diru laguntza bat eskatu ahal izateko). Musika konposatzea, letrak idaztea, kanta borobiltzea, estudioa kontratatzea, grabatzea, ekoiztea, nahastea, masterizatzea, euskarriak diseinatzea, bideoklipa egitea, diskoa euskarri fisikoan kaleratzea eta plataforma digitaletan jartzea. Prozesu horretan artista baten irabaziak 0€ dira, eta gastuak, berriz, 3000€ eta 10000€ artekoak gutxi gorabehera.

Momentu horretan, kantu edo disko bat kaleratzean, hasi daiteke dirua “irabazten”. Normalean kontzertuetan altak eta bajak ematen dira, eta egun horiek dira kotizatzen direnak. Beraz, diru irabazi (edo galera ezak) izateko aurretik hilabete askotako lana egin behar du, eta diru kopuru handia inbertitu.

Baina ez dut gehiegi dramatizatu nahi. Talde edo bakarlari bakoitzaren egoera oso ezberdina izan daiteke, eta gure kasuan hau dena oso prozesu interesgarria izan da beti.

Egoera ekonomikotik haratago, musikariei edo pertsona esanguratsuei beti eskatu zaie publikoki posizionatzea. Beraien botere mediatikoa hitzez edo ekintzez erabiltzea aldarri bat edo beste babesteko. Maila ezberdinetan, baina ikusi dugu zer gertatu den KKRren udako jaialdi guztiekin. Inoiz baino gehiago, artista baten ekintzak bozgorailu politiko bilakatu dira.

Artista batek jaialdi batean ez jotzeak jaialdia kaltetzen du, bai. Baina artista batek plataforma batetik katalogoa kentzeak ez du apenas eragiten. Aldiz, erabiltzaile askok aldi berean eta koordinatuta plataforma bat utziko balute, enpresek sumatuko lukete diru sarrera horien falta. Oraingoan, artistek baino entzuleek eman beharko lukete pausoa benetan kalte eta boikot bat egiteko. Hala ere, uste dut artistek utzi egin behar dutela Spotify, entzuleek ere utzi dezaten.

Palestinan Israelek egiten duen genozidioa babesten duten enpresak boikoteatuko ditugu ahal dugun heinean. Baina, baliatu dezakegu boikota euskal musikaren osasunaren aldeko jarrera egokiak hartzeko? Entzuleak kontsumo egokira bideratu ditzakegu? Eta musika edo kulturaren kontsumotik haratago zer? Zerbait gehiago aldatuko dugu, edo Spotify uztea modan dagoen trend bat da?

Enpresei boikota


Horrelako kanpainen deialdiak Whatsappez jaso ohi dira, Instagrameko kontu batera bideratuta eta Gmail bat jarriz kontakturako helbide zuzen bezala. Jendeak ahal duena egiten du eskura dituen tresnekin —noski baietz eta eskerrak!— eta ez dugu zertan jakin behar guztiaren atzean zer dagoen. Baina enpresa batzuekin era batera jokatzeak edo ez, agerian uzten du teknologiaren munduan zein galduta gauden.

Googleen eta Amazonen azpiegitura teknologikoa erabili ohi du sistematikoki Israelek Palestina jazartzeko. El Salto hedabideak hau argitaratu zuen aurreko urtean. Eta 2023an METAren zentsurari buruz (Whatsapp, Facebook, Instagram, Threads…), hurrengo hau idatzi zuen Human Rights Watch GKEak, normalean “proyankia” izanik.

Beraz, Palestinak jasaten duen genozidioan kolaboratzen duten enpresen tresnak erabiltzen ditugu, Palestinaren genozidioa sustatzen duen beste enpresa bat kaltetzeko.

Eta koherenteagoak izan nahiko bagenu?

Gure kanpainaren komunikazioa sare libre eta kontrolatuetan egin dezakegu, eta euskaraz:

  • Fedibertsoa.eus-en aurkitu ditzakegun Mastodon, Lemmy, Peertube edo Pixelfed sareak sortu eta horietan ere edukiak zabalduz.
  • Liberaforms bidez atxikimenduak eskatuz edo iritzien horrela jasoz.
  • Domeinu propioa erosiz eta webgune sinple bat eraikiz (WordPress edo bestelako CMS libreen bidez).
  • Domeinu propioko eposta erabiliz.

Gero, Instagram, Whatsapp, Facebook, X, BlueSky eta gure datuekin jolastu nahi duten eta Israelen konplize diren sare guztietan zabaldu, erabiltzaileak gure komunikazio libre eta kontrolatuetara bideratuz. Ez ordaindu publizitatea eta ez sustatu sare hauen erabilera.

Baina gauza gehiago ere egin ditzakegu eguneroko teknologiekin:

  • DuckDuckGo, SearXNG edo beste bilatzaile libre bat erabili nabigatzailean.
  • Firefox, Brave, Chromium edo bestelako nabigatzaile libre bat erabili.
  • Ez erosi Amazonen, ez erabili Instagram, ez erabili Whatsapp, ez erabili Gmail edo Google Appak; gure datuekin irabazten dute dirua.
  • Baina batez ere, ez sustatu teknologia hauek hezkuntza zentroetan.

Koherentzia absolutua izatea oso zaila da. Janzten dugunak, jaten dugunak edo erabiltzen dugunak Israelekin zerikusirik ez duela jakitea ez da batere erraza.

Honela eztabaida handiagoa da, zailagoa, eta agian Spotify uzteko ekintza sinpletik haratago doanez, aldaketarako duen indarra lausotu egiten da. Baina probestu dezakegu Spotifyetik ateratzea beste tresna, enpresa edo ohitura batzuk aldatu eta boikoteatzeko ere. DeSpotify egitetik DeGoogle egitera.

Gure auzoko kanpainak beste era batera eta beste tresna batzuekin antolatzera. Agian zigilu bat asma dezakegu hori komunikatzeko: “Kanpaina honetan ez da genozidioa bultzatu duen enpresaren teknologiarik erabili”. Zer dakit… Hemen garrantzitsuena fokua non jarri erabakitzea da. Musikak zerbait gehiagorako balio badigu, probestu dezagun. Bestela, toki berean bukatuko dugu hasitako bidea.

Plataforma


Irakurri dut sareetan Tidal dela artistari hobekien ordaintzen dion plataforma, baina ez da horrela. Gainera, handia da beste plataforma batera migrazioa egin eta berriro toki berean bukatzeko arriskua. Ongi aukeratu, eta kontuan izan beharko genuke enpresa horrek zein inbertsio eta hornitzaile dituen.

Soluzio bateratu bat, hilabeteko harpidetza eta musika katalogo handia kontsumitzeko aukera eta merkea edo plan familiarrarekin gastuak partekatzeko plataforma bat bilatzen ari bazarete, ez dago artista babestuko duen aukera egokirik. Enpresa guztiek 0.002€ eta 0.02€ artean ordaintzen diote artistari erreprodukzio bakoitzeko. Eta irabazi horiek gero disketxe eta distribuzio digital lanak egiten dituzten enpresekin partekatu behar dira (%100 autoekoizpena denean). Normalean artistak %80 eta besteek %20 jasotzen badute ere, oso ohikoa da 50/50 formula.

Ez da nire intentzioa enpresa baten zerbitzuak edo bestearenak gomendatzea. Eta gainera, oso ondo azaltzen du dena hemen Zonafrankako Frankiek: Spootifyen kakaztea, SLOP musikala eta alternatiba posibleak kontsumitzailearen interesen arabera. Taula ederra sortu du:

Soinu ingeniaria den lagun batekin hitz egin nuen honi buruz. Berak aipatu zidan nola duela 15 urte jada pentsatu zuen zer izan zitekeen Spoti-fair bat, edo justuagoa den plataforma bat. Bere klaseetan antzeko eztabaidak izaten zituzten. Garai hartan ere enpresek musika behar zuten, musikarekin zerikusirik ez zuen helburu bat lortzeko. Beraz, artistari xoxik ez. Ez da asko aldatu.

Aipatuko nukeen plataformetako bat da Bandcamp. Denda baten azpiegitura teknologikoa ematen dio artistari, eta orrialde propio bat diseinatzeko aukera irabazien %20/25aren truke. Pare bat aldiz saldu dute plataforma, eta horrekin ere arazoak izan ditzakegu etorkizunean. Ez baitakigu nork erosi dezakeen.

Nik imajinatzen dut tresna publiko bat izango dugula noizbait kultura sostengatzen laguntzeko. Orain Europako diru-laguntzekin sortutako bideo eta podcast plataforma publikoez betetzen ari gara internet. Momenturen batean iritsiko zaigu musikara ere. Baina ez bada iristen?

Jabetza kolektiboan edo pribatu federatuan bilatuko nuke irtenbidea. Adibide ederra dugu Funkwhale instantzia euskaldunarekin: BaleaFunk. Proiektua fedibertsoan dago eta zure musika igo dezakezu.

Badaude proiektu interesgarriak martxan, Subvert bezalakoa. Bandcamp plataformaren alternatiba kooperatibo bezala saltzen dute. Eta funtsean hori da, kooperatiba bat bazkidetza irekiak dituena eta momentuz sortze prozesuan dagoena. Bazkideentzako itxitako foroetan hartzen ari dira erabakiak, eta beraien roadmap edo aurreikusitako ibilbidea publikoa da.

Edo Resonate, erreprodukzioen arabera ordaintzen duzu, harpidetzarik gabe. Eta parte hartzen duten artista, erabiltzaile eta langileen proiektua da. Pribatutasuna bermatzen dute, eta algoritmoaren gomendioen aurkakoak dira.

Laburbilduz, plataformek ez dute artista babesten. Artista batek diru gehiago irabaziko du bere musika irratiak edo telebistak erabiltzen badu, edo SGAE edo EKKI bezalako erakunde publikoek egiten duten musika erabiltzen duten negozioen rekaudaziotik (tristea bada ere). Eta argi dagoen gauza bakarra hurrengoa da:

Artista bat babesteko era zuzenena, bere kontzertuetara joatea eta bere diskoak erostea da.

Eta gero zer?


Ekintza indibidualetik haratago, ez goaz inora ekintza edo konponbide kolektiborik gabe. Zein soluzio ikusten diogu euskal musikari internet bidez kontsumitu eta partekatzeko, ahalik eta koherentzia digital eta kultural handiena mantenduz, non artistak babestuko diren eta Palestinaren aurkako sarraskia (edo besteren bat) babesten duten enpresei boikota egingo zaien?

Eta testuinguru horretan etorkizun hurbil batean… Zein da imajinatzen dugun kultura eta horrentzako sostengu bizigarri posiblea? Behar dugu? Nahi dugu? Nola nahi dugu? Ordainduko dugu? Edo beste era batera babestuko dugu? Edo zuzenean AA bati eskatuko diogu Esanezin edo MICEren hurrengo kanta asmatzeko?

Agian azken aukera euskal musikariak nolabait batzea izango da. Eskubideak lortzeko sindikatuak edo kooperatiba kulturalak eraikiz. Edo zuzenean Palestinaren aldeko aldarri kolektibo eta kultural baten bitartez. Zeinek daki etzi etorriko dena?

Lehen pausoa behintzat argi dugu: Spotifyetik irten.

#AAEZ #Alternatibak #DeGoogle #Genozidioa #Google #Israel #Meta #Musikariak #Palestina #Spotify

etzi.pm/spoti-fire-stop-ify-ed…

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 giorno fa)


The Ideal Disinformation Weapon: AI Companion Apps are being weaponized for hybrid warfare and stochastic terrorism


Renowned Canadian hybrid warfare, AI and disinformation expert Blair Maddock-Ferrie of Carleton University writes on the serious threat to national security that AI Companion Apps and girlfriends like Replika, Character.ai, etc. pose today.


The Ideal Disinformation Weapon: AI Companion Apps are being weaponized for hybrid warfare and stochastic terrorism


Renowned Canadian hybrid warfare, AI and disinformation expert Blair Maddock-Ferrie of Carleton University writes on the serious threat to national security that AI Companion Apps and girlfriends like Replika, Character.ai, etc. pose today.


The Ideal Disinformation Weapon: AI Companion Apps are being weaponized for hybrid warfare and stochastic terrorism


Renowned Canadian hybrid warfare, AI and disinformation expert Blair Maddock-Ferrie of Carleton University writes on the serious threat to national security that AI Companion Apps and girlfriends like Replika, Character.ai, etc. pose today.