China leads nations with new climate plans, defying U.S. climate denial
China leads nations with new climate plans, defying U.S. climate denial
China led several countries in announcing new climate plans on Wednesday and offered a veiled rebuke of the U.S. president’s anti-climate rhetoric a day earlier at the U.N.Reuters (NBC News)
like this
How Brazil’s Oil Giant Is Using Gen-Z Science and Climate Influencers to Green Up Its Image | Petrobras has co-opted social media stars who should be exposing its greenwashing, not taking part in it
How Brazil’s Oil Giant Is Using Gen-Z Science and Climate Influencers to Green Up Its Image - DeSmog
Petrobras has co-opted the social media stars who should be exposing its greenwashing, not taking part in it, critics say.Juliana Aguilera (DeSmog)
like this
Unsurprisingly, the Venn diagram of 'social media stars' and 'hard-nosed investigative journalists' are two non-intersecting circles. In fact, I'm not sure the latter group still exists.
Is Greg Palast still alive?
China announces plans to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions
Chinese President Xi Jinping on Wednesday told the United Nations that by 2035, his country plans to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 7%–10% below its peak, and called out “some countries” for moving against the global clean energy transitionAlongside the economy-wide emission reduction goal, Xi said that within 10 years, China plans to increase its installed capacity of wind and solar power to over six times its 2020 levels. It also plans to boost the share of non-fossil fuels in domestic energy consumption to over 30%.
China announces plans to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions
At a climate leaders' summit at the United Nations on Wednesday, Chinese President Xi Jinping announced that China would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 7-10%, and increase consumption of non-fossil fuels domestically.FRANCE 24
like this
lol. So much for green China. I wonder if all those fools blindly defending them feel like idiots now.
I know one or two mods who love to ban people for pointing out how the hype is just hype.
Why economies gain by preparing for climate change
Why economies gain by preparing for climate change
Climate change is a major economic threat. With a new model, economist Andrea Titton shows how climate disasters can disrupt supply chains, how climate tipping points may cost trillions each year, and how international fairness is also at stake.University of Amsterdam (Phys.org)
like this
like this
Verizon Remains On The Legal Hook For Illegally Spying On You And Selling Your Movement Data (For Now)
For decades, major U.S. wireless providers have collected sensitive customer movement and location data (often down to the meter), then sold it to a long list of random dipshits — usually without bothering to clearly inform customers or get their consent. Five years ago, this resulted in folks like stalkers and people pretending to be law enforcement abusing said data.
Case file: s3.documentcloud.org/documents…
Verizon Remains On The Legal Hook For Illegally Spying On You And Selling Your Movement Data (For Now)
For decades, major U.S. wireless providers have collected sensitive customer movement and location data (often down to the meter), then sold it to a long list of random dipshits — usually without b…Techdirt
China for First Time Promises to Reduce Its Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Other nations have achieved larger declines after reaching peak climate pollution — and the world’s biggest emitter has exceeded its own goals
At Global Climate Summit This Week, U.S. Isolation Was on Full Display
On Wednesday in New York, countries lined up to say they would accelerate their efforts to cut greenhouse-gas emissions. In staying away, the U.S. was all but alone.
World’s oceans fail key health check as acidity crosses critical threshold for marine life
World’s oceans fail key health check as acidity crosses critical threshold for marine life
Scientists call for renewed global effort to curb fossil fuels as seven of nine planetary boundaries now transgressedJonathan Watts (The Guardian)
Failure is not inevitable; failure is a choice. A choice that must and can be avoided
Oh good, now all we have to do is urge our political and business leaders to sacrifice short term economy for a chance at planetary survival. I'm sure they'll do the right thing, if only they knew that we're all fucked if they don't.
Levke Caesar, co-lead of Planetary Boundary Science Lab, noted that it took a year for newly emitted gases to mix into the atmosphere, but a thousand years to settle into the ocean. “To be a good scientist, I have to take emotions out of work. Still, I would say looking at this data, when I allow myself to connect to it emotionally, then I am afraid. This really scares me,” she said.
I think it is time for scientists to be unapologetic about their emotions, what other time do we have? She is right to be scared, we all should be.
Summer 2025 is the warmest on record for the UK
Provisional Met Office statistics confirm that summer 2025 is officially the warmest summer on record for the UK.
Analysis by Met Office climate scientists has also shown that a summer as hot or hotter than 2025 is now 70 times more likely than it would be in a ‘natural’ climate with no human caused greenhouse gas emissions.
The UK’s mean temperature from 1 June to 31 August stands at 16.10°C, which is 1.51°C above the long-term meteorological average. This surpasses the previous record of 15.76°C, set in 2018, and pushes the summer of 1976 out of the top five warmest summers in a series dating back to 1884.
Met Office scientist Dr Emily Carlisle said: “Provisional Met Office statistics show that summer 2025 is officially the warmest on record with a mean temperature of 16.10°C, surpassing the previous record of 15.76°C set in 2018.
“The persistent warmth this year has been driven by a combination of factors including the domination of high-pressure systems, unusually warm seas around the UK and the dry spring soils. These conditions have created an environment where heat builds quickly and lingers, with both maximum and minimum temperatures considerably above average.”
1976, which had a mean temperature of 15.70°C, has now dropped out of the top five warmest summers since records began in 1884, leaving all five warmest summers having occurred since 2000.
like this
Netanyahu addresses empty hall, after most delegations walked out in protest
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivered his country’s speech to the UN General Assembly in New York on Friday, to a nearly empty hall after most delegations walked out in protest of the genocidal war in the Gaza Strip, which is about to enter its third year.
Archived version: archive.is/newest/middleeastmo…
Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.
copymyjalopy likes this.
Not sure feeling strange / Stranger or strange? Take a guess / Is my mouth dry yet
cross-posted from: lemmy.zip/post/49625912
That point where you're waiting for edibles to hit
copymyjalopy likes this.
Kami doesn't like this.
Belarus proposes new nuclear plant to supply energy to Russian-occupied Ukraine
Belarus opened its first nuclear power plant in Astravets in 2020 amid protests and concern in neighbouring Lithuania, where there was opposition to the plant's location.
Archived version: archive.is/newest/euronews.com…
Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.
Clownfish and Anemones Are Disappearing Because of Climate Change
Clownfish and Anemones Are Disappearing Because of Climate Change
A Boston University research team has found that Red Sea clownfish and anemone populations collapsed because of a marine heat wave.Jessica Colarossi (The Brink)
Ukraine: Zelenskyy threatens attack on Kremlin
Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has warned Russia's leadership to end the war or face becoming a target of Ukrainian drones and missiles.
Archived version: archive.is/20250926013550/dw.c…
Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.
Trump wants Tony Blair for Gaza transition; Netanyahu says Israel must “finish the job in Gaza”; Comey indicted
Trump wants Tony Blair for Gaza transition; Netanyahu says Israel must “finish the job in Gaza”; Comey indicted
Drop Site Daily: September 26, 2025Drop Site News
China’s Renewable Push Meets Climate Reality In Africa: Environmentalists worry that Beijing is playing a double game that is harming Africa in its fight against environmental injustice
cross-posted from: lemmy.sdf.org/post/42785623
ArchivedChina is positioning itself as the world’s champion for renewable energy and has been heavily investing in the sector for the last 20 years. On the other hand, in order to support its renewables sector and consolidate the supply chain, it has also been financing mega-projects that exploit natural resources such as coal and oil — particularly in Africa.
Between development, dependence, and the energy transition, some environmentalists worry that China is playing a double game that is harming Africa in its fight against environmental injustice.
[...]
Some scholars have raised concerns that under the current model, large loans from China are further increasing its debt and putting some African countries in impossible financial positions.
In an analysis published in November 2023, Jana de Kluiver, a researcher specializing in Africa at the Institute for Security Studies, warned of growing concerns about Chinese loans in Africa: Research by AidData has shown that Chinese public lenders, motivated by profit, often include conditions in their loan agreements that can put a strain on already fragile African economies. These include bans on collective restructuring and strict confidentiality clauses. Such conditions can limit the ability of borrowing countries to make independent and sovereign financial decisions.
[...]
The numerous projects implemented with Chinese support have enormous consequences and local impacts. Massive population displacements benefit Chinese companies that set up shop to carry out projects. Deforestation and environmental degradation are detrimental to the livelihoods of local and vulnerable communities. Between inequalities and responsibilities, climate injustice is becoming increasingly glaring.
The FILIMBI citizen movement, a Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)-based pro democracy movement, spoke out against this dynamic in November 2024. According to an article by Projet AfriqueChine, the movement points the finger at Chinese illegal gold miners in the region for polluting the Arwini River in the northeast of the country.
[...]
Between promises of a greener Africa and the continued exploitation and use of carbon, coupled with the vulnerability of populations who, in addition to suffering the consequences of climate change, face social damage such as famine and lack of housing, the continent finds itself caught in the middle of conflicting interests.
[...]
Climate goals and fossil fuel plans don't add up, experts say
The report compiled by more than 50 international researchers compares fossil fuel expansion against the goals of the Paris climate accord, and found a chasm between promises and reality.
The Production Gap Report 2025 :: Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI)
Climate goals and fossil fuel plans don't add up, experts say
Countries are still planning to increase production of fossil fuels to levels incompatible with global commitments on climate change, according to new research published on Monday.Science X (Phys.org)
like this
China tries to mask its environmental destruction, control Scarborough Shoal with nature preserve
cross-posted from: lemmy.sdf.org/post/42722173
ArchivedCountries around the globe condemned China’s hypocritical plans for a nature preserve on Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea, where Beijing has wreaked environmental havoc with its artificial island-building as it seeks control over maritime territory to which it has no legal claim.
The Philippines faces constant coercion from China near the shoal and elsewhere inside its internationally recognized exclusive economic zone (EEZ). Beijing, which illegally claims most of the South China Sea, deploys coast guard, navy and maritime militia vessels to harass Philippine fishing, humanitarian missions, and routine military and law enforcement patrols. The aggression has continued even after an international tribunal’s 2016 ruling that invalidated China’s arbitrary claims to the South China Sea and found that Beijing violated Philippine rights to Scarborough Shoal.
Manila quickly denounced China’s declaration of an “island nature reserve” on the shoal. The move “is less about protecting the environment and more about justifying [China’s] control over a maritime feature that is part of the territory of the Philippines,” stated National Security Advisor Eduardo Año. “It is a clear pretext toward eventual occupation.”
[...]
Australia and Japan joined Indo-Pacific partners in calling for China to comply with the tribunal ruling, while the United Kingdom opposed “any unilateral activity that changes the facts on the ground and raises tensions in the South China Sea.”
Experts called China’s actions an example of lawfare — purposely misinterpreting the law to change the status quo — and pointed to Beijing’s history of causing environmental damage in the South China Sea.
“This isn’t environmental protection — it’s environmental lawfare,” Ray Powell, director of the SeaLight Project at Stanford University’s Gordian Knot Center for National Security Innovation, told the U.S. Naval Institute News. He cited “highly destructive methods” used by Chinese fishing crews and reports that Beijing has destroyed more than 1,800 hectares of coral reef in the South China Sea with its artificial island-building. The international tribunal also found that China harmed coral reefs and inflicted “irreparable damage to the marine environment.”
[...]
Beijing has long used encroachment in an attempt to exert control over its neighbors’ territory. Analysts say such gray-zone tactics — sometimes called salami slicing — are small enough to avoid a military response but accumulate to China’s benefit. Examples include:
- China’s aggressive interference with Philippine resupply missions to its military outpost on Second Thomas Shoal, which Beijing wants Manila to abandon.
- Beijing’s artificial island-building in the contested Paracel and Spratly chains. By militarizing the features, China hopes to establish de facto authority over economically important stretches of sea.
- Regular China Coast Guard intrusions near the Japan-administered Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea, an effort to challenge Tokyo’s control over the resource-rich territory.
- Fish farms and marine platforms that Beijing built without permission where its EEZ overlaps with the Republic of Korea’s in the Yellow Sea.
- Military harassment of self-governed Taiwan, which China claims as its territory and threatens to annex by force.
- Infrastructure projects Beijing has built along its de facto border with India and Chinese patrols into disputed territory, all aimed at asserting authority and upending the status quo.
China tries to mask its environmental destruction, control Scarborough Shoal with nature preserve
FORUM Staff Countries around the globe condemned China’s hypocritical plans for a nature preserve on Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea, where Beijing has wreaked environmental havoc with its arIPDForum (Indo-Pacific Defense FORUM)
Alex Jones sports Hitler mustache in shocking broadcast: 'It had a wild effect on women'
Alex Jones sports Hitler mustache in shocking broadcast: 'It had a wild effect on women'
Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones said he was conducting a "social experiment" by sporting a mustache in the style of Adolf Hitler — and claimed that it made him more attractive to women.David Edwards (Raw Story)
‘We must change’: how drought and overextraction of water has run Iran dry
‘We must change’: how drought and overextraction of water has run Iran dry
Iranians blame climate change, sanctions, mistakes and neglect, and Iran’s vice-president wants to tackle them allPatrick Wintour (The Guardian)
like this
Those wacky Iranians, having such peculiar exotic practices and problems. I'm so glad that isnt happening here.
hacks the last limb off Marc reisner's corpse and wraps it trash bags, while kicking his torso
So wacky and exotic–What'll they think of next?
like this
WTF? I am from a State in those United, I do not agree, water, food and health are human rights
From drought to deluge: Report highlights increasingly erratic water cycle
The water cycle has become increasingly erratic and extreme, swinging between deluge and drought, according to a new report from the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). It highlights the cascading impacts of too much or too little water on economies and society.
From drought to deluge: WMO report highlights increasingly erratic water cycle
The State of Global Water Resources report says only about one-third of the global river basins had “normal” conditions in 2024. The rest were either above or below normal – the sixth consecutive year of clear imbalance.World Meteorological Organization
!RemoteWork@fedia.io - Things that WFH/field people might like
It came up last night that there should maybe be a comm for remote work people, so now there is.
!RemoteWork@fedia.io
New report shows where cancer-causing chemicals are polluting water for over 200 million Americans
New report shows where cancer-causing chemicals are polluting water for over 200 million Americans
More than 200 million people are at risk of drinking tap water contaminated with chemicals that cause cancer, liver damage, birth defects and other reproductive harms, according to research released Wednesday that includes an interactive map of high-…Carey Gillam (The New Lede)
like this
FOIA records reveal EPA leaders frequent meetings with industry lobbyists
FOIA records reveal EPA leaders frequent meetings with industry lobbyists
Top regulatory officials met with agricultural and chemical industry representatives dozens of times in the first few months after President Donald Trump took office in January, government records show — meetings that were followed by a series of reg…Brian Bienkowski (The New Lede)
like this
It would have to be repealed by Congress. The main problem is enforcing it against a regime that regularly flouts the law, especially when there's not a lot of oversight to ensure they're fully in compliance when they do "comply."
They don't have to repeal it. They only need to pretend to participate.
like this
Not all in the same boat: Gaza flotilla leadership turns on itself over ‘woke’ agenda
Not all in the same boat: Gaza flotilla leadership turns on itself over ‘woke’ agenda
Internal conflicts have hit the board of directors of the Global Sumud Flotilla (GSF), a multinational convoy of several dozen vessels aiming to breach Israel’s…Carl Deconinck (Brussels Signal)
Mass Walkout Leaves UN General Assembly Chamber Mostly 'Empty' for Netanyahu Speech
cross-posted from: ibbit.at/post/65009
From Common Dreams via this RSS feed
Mass Walkout Leaves UN General Assembly Chamber Mostly 'Empty' for Netanyahu Speech
"I don't recall seeing such a large walkout for quite some time at UNGA," said one observer. "Israel has chosen to be a pariah and is increasingly treated as such by the international community."brad-reed (Common Dreams)
like this
How Bill Gates is playing both sides of the climate crisis – video
Think Bill Gates is fixing the climate crisis? Not if you follow the money. While he funds green innovation and talks about cutting emissions, Gates also invests in dirty industries such as coal, oil and private jets. In this episode, Neelam Tailor exposes how one of the world’s most powerful climate voices is betting on both sides of the crisis – and making a lot of money in the process
like this
Both? Both sides? Both sides of the climate crisis? My dudes, nobody gets to go live on the Sun under its protection, not even with all the money. There's one side to the climate crisis, and we're all on it.
Oh, I see. He's making money pretending to invest in green technologies, and he's making money polluting the environment. That's the "both sides" they meant. Except those two industries are still both on the same side of the equation. It's like we're all on the Titanic, and Gates is spreading towels over deck chairs AND sitting at a table by the bar, like "Oh no! A guy with all the money is being greedy and dishonest. What should we do?"
Death rates rose in hospital ERs after private equity firms took over, study finds
Death rates rose in hospital ERs after private equity firms took over, study finds
After hospitals were acquired by private equity firms, patient death rates in the emergency departments rose by 13% compared to similar hospitals, a study says.Gretchen Morgenson (NBC News)
Fox Legal Analyst Tells Maria Bartiromo ‘I Don’t Think There Is a Case’ Against Comey
Fox Legal Analyst Tells Maria Bartiromo ‘I Don’t Think There Is a Case’ Against Comey
Andrew McCarthy told anchor Maria Bartiromo on Friday that he does not think there is a solid case against former FBI Director James Comey in the recent indictment against him.Alex Griffing (Mediaite)
adhocfungus likes this.
Federal vs Local Control: What does Trumps Crackdown on D.C. Law Enforcement look like?
What do clashes like this tell us about the balance between public safety, local autonomy, and executive power in the U.S.?
"In August of 2025, President Trump invoked Section 740 of the D.C. Home Rule Act, declaring a ‘public safety emergency’ in Washington, D.C after citing rampant crime. Under this order, he could place the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) under federal control for 30 days. Between August 11 and September 10, over 2,000 National Guard troops were deployed alongside local forces to patrol the streets. During this time, over 40% of the arrests made in D.C. were immigration-related."
Federal vs Local Control: What does Trumps Crackdown on D.C. Law Enforcement look like?
"In August of 2025, President Trump invoked Section 740 of the D.C. Home Rule Act, declaring a ‘public safety emergency’ in Washington, D.C after citing rampant crime. Under this order, he could place the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) under federal control for 30 days. Between August 11 and September 10, over 2,000 National Guard troops were deployed alongside local forces to patrol the streets. During this time, over 40% of the arrests made in D.C. were immigration-related."
linuxanza di emergenza nei momenti di peggior viaggio mentale (installo Linux in autobus perché Windows si è rotto)
In questi giorni si è verificato un meme molto conosciuto ma altrettanto sgradito, e cioè che ho scoperto che Windows 10 sul mio portatile è corrotto malamente, chissà da quanto tempo e chissà perché… È corrotto al punto che durante l’uso normale non si nota nulla di particolarmente anomalo, al di là delle solite piccole […]
Offenes Repaircafé und Linux-Hilfe von Die Linke Heidelberg
Laptop rebelliert? Löcher in der Hose? Fliewatüüt macht komische Geräusche?
Der landschaftliche Wert von Müllhalden ist ja doch eher gering. Aber wir leben ja im einundzwanzigsten Jahrhundert: die moderne Technik könnte es uns glatt erlauben, Gegenstände auch zu reparieren. Vorausgesetzt natürlich, dass der Hersteller nicht aktiv Vorkehrungen dagegen getroffen hat...
Lass es uns gemeinsam herausfinden: Wir helfen dir bei Reparaturen aller Art. Und wir helfen dir dabei, einen Computer, von dem Microsoft meint, dass er ab Oktober auf den Müll gehört (weil er kein Windows 11 unterstützt), dank einer einfachen Linux-Version noch weitere zwanzig Jahre zu benutzen. Mit einer Geschwindigkeit, die dich überraschen dürfte.
Wann? Am Samstag, den 22. November 2025, von 13 bis 18 Uhr
Wo? Theodor-Körner-Str. 7, 69115 Heidelberg
Barrierefreier Zugang: über die Rampe im Hinterhof, erreichbar durch das Tor im Gebäude Czernyring 2/1 oder das Tor im Gebäude Theodor-Körner-Str. 11.
Vorher findet von 11 bis 13 Uhr unser linkes Frühstück statt. Hierzu bist du ebenfalls herzlich eingeladen!
Offenes Repaircafé und Linux-Hilfe von Die Linke Heidelberg
Laptop rebelliert? Löcher in der Hose? Fliewatüüt macht komische Geräusche?
Der landschaftliche Wert von Müllhalden ist ja doch eher gering. Aber wir leben ja im einundzwanzigsten Jahrhundert: die moderne Technik könnte es uns glatt erlauben, Gegenstände auch zu reparieren. Vorausgesetzt natürlich, dass der Hersteller nicht aktiv Vorkehrungen dagegen getroffen hat...
Lass es uns gemeinsam herausfinden: Wir helfen dir bei Reparaturen aller Art. Und wir helfen dir dabei, einen Computer, von dem Microsoft meint, dass er ab Oktober auf den Müll gehört (weil er kein Windows 11 unterstützt), dank einer einfachen Linux-Version noch weitere zwanzig Jahre zu benutzen. Mit einer Geschwindigkeit, die dich überraschen dürfte.
Wann? An diesem Samstag, den 25. Oktober 2025, von 13 bis 18 Uhr
Wo? Theodor-Körner-Str. 7, 69115 Heidelberg
Barrierefreier Zugang: über die Rampe im Hinterhof, erreichbar durch das Tor im Gebäude Czernyring 2/1 oder das Tor im Gebäude Theodor-Körner-Str. 11.
Vorher findet von 11 bis 13 Uhr unser linkes Frühstück statt. Hierzu bist du ebenfalls herzlich eingeladen!
Offenes Repaircafé und Linux-Hilfe von Die Linke Heidelberg
Laptop rebelliert? Löcher in der Hose? Fliewatüüt macht komische Geräusche?
Der landschaftliche Wert von Müllhalden ist ja doch eher gering. Aber wir leben ja im einundzwanzigsten Jahrhundert: die moderne Technik könnte es uns glatt erlauben, Gegenstände auch zu reparieren. Vorausgesetzt natürlich, dass der Hersteller nicht aktiv Vorkehrungen dagegen getroffen hat...
Lass es uns gemeinsam herausfinden: Wir helfen dir bei Reparaturen aller Art. Und wir helfen dir dabei, einen Computer, von dem Microsoft meint, dass er ab Oktober auf den Müll gehört (weil er kein Windows 11 unterstützt), dank einer einfachen Linux-Version noch weitere zwanzig Jahre zu benutzen. Mit einer Geschwindigkeit, die dich überraschen dürfte.
Wann? An diesem Samstag, den 26. September 2025, von 13 bis 18 Uhr
Wo? Theodor-Körner-Str. 7, 69115 Heidelberg
Barrierefreier Zugang: über die Rampe im Hinterhof, erreichbar durch das Tor im Gebäude Czernyring 2/1 oder das Tor im Gebäude Theodor-Körner-Str. 11.
Vorher findet von 11 bis 13 Uhr unser linkes Frühstück statt. Hierzu bist du ebenfalls herzlich eingeladen!
Exclusive: Mother of Hind Rajab Evacuated From Gaza
cross-posted from: lemmy.ml/post/36702646
Ryan Grim
Sep 25, 2025
Wissam Hamada, the mother of Hind Rajab, and several members of her family safely evacuated from Gaza to a third country on Thursday after protracted negotiations with the state of Israel for her release, a source involved in the exfiltration told Drop Site.Five-year-old Hind was killed by Israeli soldiers in January 2024, along with six other members of her family in Gaza City. Her killing made global headlines after a recording of her call with Palestinian emergency dispatchers pleading to be rescued was posted online.
On January 29, 2024, the car Hind was in was shot at by the Israeli military, killing her uncle, aunt, and three cousins. Relatives called the Palestinian Red Crescent Society (PRCS) in Ramallah seeking help. When a team member called the number provided, Hind’s 15-year-old cousin, Layan Hamada, the only other survivor in the car, picked up. Layan told them there was an Israeli tank nearby shooting at them. Layan can be heard screaming amid the sound of intense machine gun fire, after which, the call went dead. The rescue team called the phone back, and Hind answered, telling them that Layan had been shot and killed, she had been injured, and everyone in the car was dead. She said she could see the tank and that it was getting closer.
like this
Exclusive: Mother of Hind Rajab Evacuated From Gaza
cross-posted from: lemmy.ml/post/36702646
Ryan Grim
Sep 25, 2025
Wissam Hamada, the mother of Hind Rajab, and several members of her family safely evacuated from Gaza to a third country on Thursday after protracted negotiations with the state of Israel for her release, a source involved in the exfiltration told Drop Site.Five-year-old Hind was killed by Israeli soldiers in January 2024, along with six other members of her family in Gaza City. Her killing made global headlines after a recording of her call with Palestinian emergency dispatchers pleading to be rescued was posted online.
On January 29, 2024, the car Hind was in was shot at by the Israeli military, killing her uncle, aunt, and three cousins. Relatives called the Palestinian Red Crescent Society (PRCS) in Ramallah seeking help. When a team member called the number provided, Hind’s 15-year-old cousin, Layan Hamada, the only other survivor in the car, picked up. Layan told them there was an Israeli tank nearby shooting at them. Layan can be heard screaming amid the sound of intense machine gun fire, after which, the call went dead. The rescue team called the phone back, and Hind answered, telling them that Layan had been shot and killed, she had been injured, and everyone in the car was dead. She said she could see the tank and that it was getting closer.
xxce2AAb
in reply to ZeroCool • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
RunJun
in reply to xxce2AAb • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
xxce2AAb
in reply to RunJun • • •Heh. I'm reminded of the story of what happened when Donald Sadoway was pitching liquid metal batteries to the US Army. He was asked what would happen if a sniper were to put a .50 BMG into one of them. His response? "Well, it'll leak a little inert non-toxic metal and then self-seal whereupon it'll just keep working".
...We still don't use those for reasons I cannot fathom, despite them being literally cheap as dirt and perfect for grid-level storage.
Every time somebody talk about renewables, some twat also goes "but what about storage?" and has me screaming "WE'VE HAD THE PERFECT SOLUTION SINCE 2009, GOD DAMN IT!".
class of battery that uses molten salts as an electrolyte and offers both a high energy density and a high power density
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)like this
Maeve likes this.
MrMakabar
in reply to xxce2AAb • • •Auli
in reply to xxce2AAb • • •xxce2AAb
in reply to Auli • • •Korhaka
in reply to xxce2AAb • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
egrets
in reply to Korhaka • • •I'm not sure who downvoted you, but China's carbon emissions p/c have more than tripled this century, and for only two years (up to 2022) in that period have they been less than the year prior, and even then, by tiny amounts.
Plenty of countries have worse figures (including the US, Canada, and Australia), but unless the trajectory has changed notably since 2022, it doesn't paint a pretty picture. The US has dropped by a third in the same period, though it's much too high.
China CO2 Emissions - Worldometer
Worldometerjj4211
in reply to egrets • • •Probably because while change over time is important, it's a trickier metric to cross compare.
For example, at the beginning of the century, their per capita emissions were low and also, nearly half of the population was in extreme poverty. So while we can balk at the tripling, it seems unfair since the competition was already high and mostly due to people living it up.
To say China is doing worse than the US because they went up while the US went down, well the per capita for US is still 50% higher than China in absolute terms. Now the UK can claim that in absolute and relative terms they are doing better.
Though even then you have some hiccups. UK emissions per capita are down and are really low compared to China numbers, fantastic. How much, however, is due to outsourcing the ecologically inconvenient manufacturing to nations like China? If the contribution of imports added to things, how does the picture shift?
On the flip side, the focus on per-capita in the name of fairness also unreasonably gives a pass to huge polluters in China. If a heavily polluting endeavor sets up shop in china, no big deal, they get to just divide their impact by 1.4 billion to not seem so bad, even if the portion of population pertinent to their stuff rounds to zero. So I wonder how much of that ecology impact is actually concentrated among a lot less rosy small population rather than just the consequence of improved quality of life for an average person in the nation.
egrets
in reply to jj4211 • • •Solid response, thanks. FWIW, I wasn't trying to suggest that the US is doing well in this regard, just that someone could read the headline and assume that China could reasonably be considered a green country (so to speak).
Regarding the UK, it's certainly true that domestic manufacture has nearly vanished in the last 50 years, so while a reduced dependency on coal, stricter rules on vehicles, and other similar factors are probably important, I agree that they're also likely not the only type of change that affects this – and if so, that really represents the carbon pollution moving elsewhere, as you've mentioned.
jj4211
in reply to egrets • • •chiocciola
in reply to ZeroCool • • •unexposedhazard
in reply to chiocciola • • •MrMakabar
in reply to ZeroCool • • •ImmersiveMatthew
in reply to ZeroCool • • •Anyone
in reply to ZeroCool • • •_cryptagion [he/him]
in reply to Anyone • • •Warl0k3
in reply to _cryptagion [he/him] • • •_cryptagion [he/him]
in reply to Warl0k3 • • •Warl0k3
in reply to _cryptagion [he/him] • • •_cryptagion [he/him]
in reply to Warl0k3 • • •I love when people get called out for being shitty, and the immediate defense is "you're arguing in bad faith"
this wasn't an argument. you said something stupid, I called you out for it. instead of criticizing the western world for doing _checks notes_ fucking nothing about climate change, you're going after the country investing billions into the climate for no other reason than you don't like the government.
Warl0k3
in reply to _cryptagion [he/him] • • •I'd be criticizing western countries if this article had been about the western world - but it's not, so that's not really relevant commentary. If I showed up to say something like "why aren't western countries doing better" it would be a valid point, but would absolutely not address the issue - that china is in no uncertain terms absolutely failing the environment. Trying to deflect that with accusations of racism is... transparent, at very least because you have yet to address the criticism but only the form my argument takes.
Why are you so biased that you can't even accept criticism of a group you support might be legitimate in an article explicitly about the actions of said group? People from the US do that all the time, what makes China special?
_cryptagion [he/him]
in reply to Warl0k3 • • •ok, I didn't even read further than that in your comment because it's obvious you did not read the article at all. even the headline itself should give you a fucking clue, but the article heavily relies on comparing China to the US. you would have known that if you had bothered to get over your knee-jerk reaction long enough to actually read it.
Warl0k3
in reply to _cryptagion [he/him] • • •Sigh. 4 out of 13 of the paragraphs in that article are about trump's behavior and there isn't even a mention of another country besides the US and china. Kinda hard to criticize what just isn't there (at least, if you're arguing in good faith...)
Shockingly you continue to not address the criticism, just the form of the argument. I can't imagine why that would be.
Definition of argue
Merriam-Webster Dictionary_cryptagion [he/him]
in reply to Warl0k3 • • •wrong again.
ah, yes, the good old "you support the CCP because you criticized the US" line. you aren't half as clever as you think you are, liberal, or you would know I'm banned from .ML and Hexbear and my whole post history is me shitting on tankies.
Warl0k3
in reply to _cryptagion [he/him] • • •Oh you know what, you're absolutely right. The article (ten more paragraphs!) wasn't loading due to their godawful... comment widget? I'm not sure what happened there. BUT I'll amend my prior claim since Brazil is in there too! And while hardly a western-aligned country, and I am deeply skeptical of their ability to follow through on their claims, I'll give them credit for thumbing their nose at both the US' and China's utterly pathetic showing with those climate targets. Here's hoping they can stick to them, and that COP30 will follow in their example.
Hardly an article relying on contrasting the US and China, though I suppose quoting Xi that much really does throw some spectacular shade by putting trump's whole... thing... as contrast.
Uhm... no, I just think you're arguing in bad faith. That's been my whole thesis, and it's maybe worth introspecting that you've directly jumped to being persecuted for supporting china instead of the thing I keep criticizing you for.
_cryptagion [he/him]
in reply to Warl0k3 • • •Wrong again.
Listen, it’s never gonna work out between us if you don’t even read your own comments. But I’ll give you credit, that’s the first time I’ve seen somebody strawman their own arguments.
Warl0k3
in reply to _cryptagion [he/him] • • •Let me know if you ever wanna respond to the substance here (to reiterate: criticizing china is absolutely warranted, especially in light of how much better Brazil is doing) instead of issues to take with the form of the argument, it'll be interesting.
Bud that's the whole point here - you're supporting the group (edit: in this case the CCP) by rejecting legitimate criticism with bad faith meandering (accusations of racism and classic whattaboutisms). Despite your presumed personal position you 100% are supporting the utterly pathetic chinese environmental goals here.
_cryptagion [he/him]
in reply to Warl0k3 • • •Did you ever wonder why everyone else in the comments is congratulating China? It’s because the rest is us don’t see an article about how China is doing the best out of all the countries in the entire world, and automatically go “hmm, it’s China and they’re authoritarian, so it’s not good enough”.
Of course they could do better. You can always do better. The rest of the world could do better. The point here is nobody else is doing anywhere near as well. You chose to focus on criticism because you do t like the politics of the nation leading the pack. China hasn’t even reached their goals, which again you would know if you read the article. But even their meager progress is far better than the goals the US has set, which is to go backwards and adopt more fossil fuels, cutting out as much renewables as possible.
So yeah, I’m supporting the progress China has made in reducing their dependence on fossil fuels. Any progress is progress, and they have more progress than anyone right now.
Warl0k3
in reply to _cryptagion [he/him] • • •You're trying to misrepresent reality again - go look at the comments (of which 1/2 are now just us two bickering); and fully 1/2 (7/14 (excluding us two), of the (as of posting) 28 total comments (including us two) (edit: this is confusingly worded, I apologize)) of the other comments in this thread are critical of the claims, most of those criticizing how sorry this promise is from China. You can't just assert easily-verified falsehoods as truth and then claim some kind of victory from that (despite that practically being codified US policy at this point...).
I chose to focus on criticism because they are leading the pack, and their efforts are sad, much like a great many other people in this thread are doing. I suppose a case could be made for that to include their politics, since politics shapes policy, but that'd be a kinda pointless semantic argument to make. My criticism of China has nothing to do with my distatste for the CCP directly and everything to do with them being the #1 global emitter of greenhouse gasses, and then even in lip-service planning to do the barest minimum. I'm not criticizing the US right now because the US is not the leader of the pack, or even relevant in this discussion (beyond being the #2 emitter).
To put in context something, this year if China's planed 10% reduction had gone through instantly at the start of the year, they would still have produced more than double the greenhouse gas emissions of the US. THEY HAVE TO DO BETTER. We all do, yes, but THEY ESPECIALLY have to do better. It ain't fucking racism to criticize the #1 culprit for choosing a target that barely does anything.
Anyone
in reply to _cryptagion [he/him] • • •China is ahead of the US, behind the EU and many other (Western and non-Western) countries (with almost no country or bloc is on track to reach the Paris agreement targets). These are simple facts. As the world's largest polluter, China should do much more than it does, but it seems there is not even a willingness to do so.
I won't comment on your accusation of being biased. I am not long here on Lemmy, but the reaction here if and when you criticize China is often weird. It's certainly not all, but some people appear to be personally insulted if you just say something critical of this regime. That's often not a sane reaction.
Corridor8031
in reply to Anyone • • •do you have any data newer than 2023? because if you look at the per capita greenhouse gases in 2023, china is only at 32/33 and usa, canada, russia, australia etc. all have much worse pollution,
and i would like to know please, what statistics you are basing it on, that china is behind the eu, because at for me it feels like china is atleast trying to do a lot, while from the eu countries i only ever hear complains about having to do anything for the enviroment, which only gets worse by this right wing people popping up everywhere.
i would like it very much to be convinced that the eu countries are actually doing anything.
Anyone
in reply to Corridor8031 • • •Not just emission but a broader picture of climate actions:
- USA - critically insufficient
- China - highly insufficient
- EU - insufficient
These are the largest emitters, you'll find all others on the site.
USA
climateactiontracker.orgCorridor8031
in reply to Anyone • • •humanspiral
in reply to Anyone • • •First, most credit should be based on recent years. You can only ask for relative progress, meaning improving year over year from recent progress instead of going from 0 to 100% renewables by tomorrow.
EU has greatest success in recent years in terms of emission reductions, but only because their energy growth has been slowing. China has much higher renewables growth from a much higher renewables base, but their emission reductions are more modest because of massive energy growth relative to massive manufacturing growth. At the same time, any growth rate at all from here is going to lead to massive emission reductions in upcomming years, just as it can continue in EU.
Trump's UN speech is desperate extortion/war cry on EU and world to end breakthrough dead ender energy extermination on the cusp of clear human victory path.
SoftestSapphic
in reply to ZeroCool • • •jj4211
in reply to ZeroCool • • •Putting aside the whole actual core subject material...
I find it bizarre to do a remote video attendance to an in-person meeting like that. I hate it when they plan that sort of thing at work. Whenever I am part of that sort of planning, I try to make a 'remote half' either before or after the event and an 'in person half'. It's just seems disrepectful to make a whole bunch of people travel and then waste some of that time listening to a person speak remotely that they could have listened to anywhere.
gandalf_der_12te
in reply to ZeroCool • • •One thing i've come to understand is that america does not at all seem to care even the slightest bit about having a future. Which, in my opinion, is super weird because it says in the bible (that the christians revere so much) that "when your messiah comes [for the second time] and you happen to have a sapling in your hand, plant the sapling first, then go see the messiah". Which means, especially if you consider it to be the "end times", that doesn't mean you should just not care about what happens after. You should still plant the tree, even if it takes 20 years for it to grow up and produce meaningful amounts of fruit.
But i guess something about wanting to have a future is "communist" or something.
humanspiral
in reply to ZeroCool • • •These are absurdly modest goals considering that their previous 2030 pledges are on track to be achieved by 2027, and these 2035 goals by 2028. All of these goals without any growth in renewables, just continuing pace. They (or I guess someone else) would literally need to nuke their solar production plants from orbit to fail on this track.
Unclear why make such modesty. Invite US to think more fossil fuel investment is smart?