Salta al contenuto principale



Air Canada Flight Attendants May Vote Down The Wage Package


While the proposed wage increases are appreciable, they fail to make up for past losses and pale in comparison to the increases secured by Air Canada pilots last year.




When Insiders Become the Threat


I was in the room for this. It still has me a bit shook


Google not required to sell Chrome, federal judge rules in antitrust case


A US judge on Tuesday rejected the government's demand that Google sell its Chrome web browser as part of a major antitrust case but imposed sweeping requirements to restore competition in online search.

The landmark ruling came after Judge Amit Mehta found in August 2024 that Google illegally maintained monopolies in online search through exclusive distribution agreements worth billions of dollars annually.

#tech


in reply to silence7

Good, if you never give up the fight, they can’t win. We have to be even more stubborn than they are.
in reply to silence7

That's what an abusive relationship looks like.

He will punch you again baby.



Vibe coding job postings gain momentum among tech companies


Technology Channel reshared this.




Judge spares Google from Chrome or Android breakup, orders data sharing with rivals and end to exclusive agreements


cross-posted from: programming.dev/post/36778872

::: spoiler Comments
- Hacker News.
:::

230-page PDF.

Today, the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division won significant remedies in its monopolization case against Google in online search. In United States et al. v. Google, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia prohibited Google from entering or maintaining exclusive contracts relating to the distribution of Google Search, Chrome, Google Assistant, and the Gemini app; ordered Google to make certain search index and user-interaction data available to rivals and potential rivals; and ordered Google to offer search and search text ads syndication services to enable rivals and potential rivals to compete.

The court’s ruling today recognizes the need for remedies that will pry open the market for general search services, which has been frozen in place for over a decade. The ruling also recognizes the need to prevent Google from using the same anticompetitive tactics for its GenAI products as it used to monopolize the search market, and the remedies will reach GenAI technologies and companies.




Judge spares Google from Chrome or Android breakup, orders data sharing with rivals and end to exclusive agreements


::: spoiler Comments
- Hacker News;
- Reddit.
:::

230-page PDF.

Today, the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division won significant remedies in its monopolization case against Google in online search. In United States et al. v. Google, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia prohibited Google from entering or maintaining exclusive contracts relating to the distribution of Google Search, Chrome, Google Assistant, and the Gemini app; ordered Google to make certain search index and user-interaction data available to rivals and potential rivals; and ordered Google to offer search and search text ads syndication services to enable rivals and potential rivals to compete.

The court’s ruling today recognizes the need for remedies that will pry open the market for general search services, which has been frozen in place for over a decade. The ruling also recognizes the need to prevent Google from using the same anticompetitive tactics for its GenAI products as it used to monopolize the search market, and the remedies will reach GenAI technologies and companies.



reshared this

in reply to Pro

Pay no attention to the fabulous new watches and luxury car the judge starts to drive.

A case that affects a broad range of people, such as this one, out be given sentencing by a broad range of people.

Nor a single judge who likely has no technical knowledge or experience that would allow him the wisdom to know what the fuck he is doing and what the (non) consequence of his ruling mean.



Judge spares Google from Chrome or Android breakup, orders data sharing with rivals and end to exclusive agreements


cross-posted from: programming.dev/post/36778872

::: spoiler Comments
- Hacker News.
:::

230-page PDF.

Today, the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division won significant remedies in its monopolization case against Google in online search. In United States et al. v. Google, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia prohibited Google from entering or maintaining exclusive contracts relating to the distribution of Google Search, Chrome, Google Assistant, and the Gemini app; ordered Google to make certain search index and user-interaction data available to rivals and potential rivals; and ordered Google to offer search and search text ads syndication services to enable rivals and potential rivals to compete.

The court’s ruling today recognizes the need for remedies that will pry open the market for general search services, which has been frozen in place for over a decade. The ruling also recognizes the need to prevent Google from using the same anticompetitive tactics for its GenAI products as it used to monopolize the search market, and the remedies will reach GenAI technologies and companies.




Judge spares Google from Chrome or Android breakup, orders data sharing with rivals and end to exclusive agreements


::: spoiler Comments
- Hacker News;
- Reddit.
:::

230-page PDF.

Today, the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division won significant remedies in its monopolization case against Google in online search. In United States et al. v. Google, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia prohibited Google from entering or maintaining exclusive contracts relating to the distribution of Google Search, Chrome, Google Assistant, and the Gemini app; ordered Google to make certain search index and user-interaction data available to rivals and potential rivals; and ordered Google to offer search and search text ads syndication services to enable rivals and potential rivals to compete.

The court’s ruling today recognizes the need for remedies that will pry open the market for general search services, which has been frozen in place for over a decade. The ruling also recognizes the need to prevent Google from using the same anticompetitive tactics for its GenAI products as it used to monopolize the search market, and the remedies will reach GenAI technologies and companies.





Judge spares Google from Chrome or Android breakup, orders data sharing with rivals and end to exclusive agreements


cross-posted from: programming.dev/post/36778872

::: spoiler Comments
- Hacker News.
:::

230-page PDF.

Today, the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division won significant remedies in its monopolization case against Google in online search. In United States et al. v. Google, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia prohibited Google from entering or maintaining exclusive contracts relating to the distribution of Google Search, Chrome, Google Assistant, and the Gemini app; ordered Google to make certain search index and user-interaction data available to rivals and potential rivals; and ordered Google to offer search and search text ads syndication services to enable rivals and potential rivals to compete.

The court’s ruling today recognizes the need for remedies that will pry open the market for general search services, which has been frozen in place for over a decade. The ruling also recognizes the need to prevent Google from using the same anticompetitive tactics for its GenAI products as it used to monopolize the search market, and the remedies will reach GenAI technologies and companies.




Judge spares Google from Chrome or Android breakup, orders data sharing with rivals and end to exclusive agreements


::: spoiler Comments
- Hacker News;
- Reddit.
:::

230-page PDF.

Today, the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division won significant remedies in its monopolization case against Google in online search. In United States et al. v. Google, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia prohibited Google from entering or maintaining exclusive contracts relating to the distribution of Google Search, Chrome, Google Assistant, and the Gemini app; ordered Google to make certain search index and user-interaction data available to rivals and potential rivals; and ordered Google to offer search and search text ads syndication services to enable rivals and potential rivals to compete.

The court’s ruling today recognizes the need for remedies that will pry open the market for general search services, which has been frozen in place for over a decade. The ruling also recognizes the need to prevent Google from using the same anticompetitive tactics for its GenAI products as it used to monopolize the search market, and the remedies will reach GenAI technologies and companies.






Judge spares Google from Chrome or Android breakup, orders data sharing with rivals and end to exclusive agreements


::: spoiler Comments
- Hacker News;
- Reddit.
:::

230-page PDF.

Today, the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division won significant remedies in its monopolization case against Google in online search. In United States et al. v. Google, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia prohibited Google from entering or maintaining exclusive contracts relating to the distribution of Google Search, Chrome, Google Assistant, and the Gemini app; ordered Google to make certain search index and user-interaction data available to rivals and potential rivals; and ordered Google to offer search and search text ads syndication services to enable rivals and potential rivals to compete.

The court’s ruling today recognizes the need for remedies that will pry open the market for general search services, which has been frozen in place for over a decade. The ruling also recognizes the need to prevent Google from using the same anticompetitive tactics for its GenAI products as it used to monopolize the search market, and the remedies will reach GenAI technologies and companies.

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)

Technology Channel reshared this.



(Technology Connections) Desiccant dehumidifiers are fascinating... but not for everyone [29:19]


Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)

reshared this

in reply to FenrirIII

As someone who lives in a desert climate where many people have humidifiers, this seems like a completely useless device. 🙂
in reply to sugar_in_your_tea

Like a humidifier is for me, I'd be so happy to have 40% for a week but it rarely goes under 60
in reply to RheumatoidArthritis

I wonder why there are no humidistats.

You know, a combined humidifier/dehumidifier that keeps a constant humidity.

in reply to squaresinger

Maybe it's uncommon to have a climate where you need both.

My furnace has a humidistat so in the winter we can adjust how much water gets sent into the hot air stream. But it's always maxed out because it's really dry every winter here.

In the summer, the AC takes care of dehumidifying. Running a dedicated dehumidifier would be a waste of electricity, at that point just turn on the AC and any extra cold is a buffer against running the AC later on.

in reply to twice_hatch

Growing up in Oklahoma, my grandfather ran a humidifier in the winter, and a dehumidifier in the summer. Even with a HVAC system, he'd have to dump out the dehumidifier every other day.
in reply to squaresinger

Complexity? You either need a drain, or a supply of water, that can't be easy to work with, and unlike with a refrigerant loop, you can't just reverse it to dry/wet things.
in reply to squaresinger

Humidifiers are simple and cheap. Maybe the cost of a 2 in 1 wouldn't make commercial sense.

Also, it would probably need two water tanks, as I imagine you wouldn't want to use the drain tank as a clean water source.

Just guessing here.

in reply to sugar_in_your_tea

Put this on your desk with a spigot on the side, and the humidifier on the other side of the room. Congratulations: pipeless pipe.
in reply to sugar_in_your_tea

Yeah I am in the same boat. I operate a swamp cooler inside my house, even!

But I used to live on a hill in San Francisco, the first hill the fog would hit as it rolled in from the Pacific Ocean, and I distinctly remember the feeling of getting up in the morning and reaching between the hangers in the closet to take a shirt out, and feeling how they were all damp. Super gross!




First tranche of Epstein docs released by House Oversight Committee




Michael Hudson: Eurasian World Order - New Global Governance




Google gets to keep Chrome, judge rules in search antitrust case


reshared this

in reply to VITecNet

I mean, of all the things to cut off of them, Chrome made the least sense to me. It's not a profitable part of the business, it would just die if spun off. The only reason Firefox is alive is because Google is funding them. Plus changing what browser you use is much easier than some of the other monopolies they have (Android, ads, YouTube).
Questa voce è stata modificata (5 giorni fa)



Austria reaffirms neutrality, rules out NATO membership


in reply to daydrinkingchickadee

Austria is a clown show compared to Nato anyway. 23k troops, 15 planes and 58 tanks, and several horses. They rely on their location nested deep behind other countries that are members of NATO for their defense. Freeloaders.
Questa voce è stata modificata (6 giorni fa)


Xi proposes Global Governance Initiative




Getting "invalid_bot_action" when trying to up- or downvote something.


Pretty much the title. Is my account treated like a bot account? My ISP gives me new IP addresses often, there is no way to get a fixed address.
in reply to anothernobody

You're welcome. You have probably checked it by mistake. It is a bit confusing as there are about 10 checkboxes in the settings 😀
in reply to iso

The display of my phone is broken so I guess I must have checked it by accident.


The state of Linux phones in 2025


Linux phones are still behind android and iPhone, but the gap shrank a surprising amount while I wasn’t looking. These are damn near usable day to day phones now! But there are still a few things that need done and I was wondering what everyone’s thoughts on these were:

1 - tap to pay. I don’t see how this can practically be done. Like, at all.

2 - android auto/apple CarPlay emulation. A Linux phones could theoretically emulate one of these protocols and display a separate session on the head unit of a car. But I dont see any kind of project out there that already does this in an open-source kind of way. The closest I can find are some shady dongles on amazon that give wireless CarPlay to head units that normally require USB cables. It can be done, but I don't see it being done in our community.

3 - voice assistants. wether done on device or phoning into our home servers and having requests processed there, this should be doable and integrated with convenient shortcuts. Home assistant has some things like this, and there’s good-old Mycroft blowing around out there still. Siri is used every day by plenty of people and she sucks. If that’s the benchmark I think our community can easily meet that.

I started looking at Linux phones again because I loathe what apple is doing to this UI now and android has some interesting foldables but now that google is forcing Gemini into everything and you can’t turn it off, killing third party ROMS, and getting somehow even MORE invasive, that whole ecosystem seems like it’s about to march right off a cliff so its not an option anymore for me.

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)
in reply to muusemuuse

So in other words they're perfectly suited for day to day use?

I have zero need for any of the janky bullshit features you listed, so this is great news!



Crypto mixing / Tumbler


Hello.

I’m wondering if anyone me here uses a Crypto tumbler or mixer service without KYC . Looking for recommendations

in reply to mysticmartz

Crazy how many think privacy stops at money.

Cash will never be as safe or private as cryptocurrency.

Truth nuke, the biggest scam ever made is the $

✈️✈️

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)


Classic tech disinformation and my battle-tested counterattack cheat sheet (work in progress)


Privacy is multiplayer. So, we must spread it.

To do well, we must fight efficiently.

We cannot waste our lives writing a custom essay against every troll, disinformer and psyop agent.

Short, simple and focused response is vital.

Here is what works for me:


  1. > I do not care about privacy
  • Agreed. We do not control X, scam. Why should we let it abuse us?
  • Agreed. X is not libre software, we do not control it, scam. Why should we let it abuse us?
  • Agreed. X fails to include a libre software license text file, we do not control it, scam. Why should we let it abuse us?
  1. > Open source ...
  • 'Open source' misses the point of libre software, by design.
  • 'Open source' is a blatantly backdoored phrase, engineered to neutralise libre software.
  1. > Developers [owners] [of anti-libre software] need [to make money] to eat.
  • You are not entitled to infect our devices and hijack control over our computing.
  • Selling libre software is good.
  1. > You must read all its source code to guarantee it is safe.
  • Blatant lie, classic disinformation, who told you to read it alone? lmao
  • When it bans us from forking it, we do not control it, guaranteed. lmao
  1. > Crypto [currency] ...
  • Truth nuke, the biggest scam ever made is the $
  • Cash will never be more safe or private than 12 words in my head.
Questa voce è stata modificata (5 giorni fa)
in reply to Autonomous User

Save this, so next time you know what to say.
Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)

in reply to ‮redirtSdeR

Findings (feel free to add your own):
- Official web client: Keeps the scale fixed
- Summit: Keeps the scale fixed
- Connect: Video won't load
- Quiblr: Can't display video internally
- old.lemmy.world: Can't display video internally
- a.lemmy.world: Can't display video internally
- m.lemmy.world: Post never loads
- photon.lemmy.world: Same as web client
in reply to ‮redirtSdeR

Sync displayed it properly. Pretty cool to see as I've never seen dynamic scaling like that.



Classic cars will still need a smog test in California after lawmakers reject Jay Leno bill


Jay Leno’s star power wasn’t enough to persuade a California legislative committee to pass a measure to allow owners of classic cars like him to be exempted from the state’s rigorous smog-check requirements.


Imagine being rich and famous and this is your political cause. What an effing creep.

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)
in reply to technocrit

I had a car caught up in this in Colorado and had to get rid of it. Specifically, I had to remove a bunch of obsolete air pump equipment and update the fueling system with a much more modern electronically controlled system. The car was measurably better than it's original standards but failed the visual check because it was missing the old, polluting, inefficient and unavailable parts.

If the car still meets the emissions of it's day, put a mileage limit on it and let it go. If there are too many on the road then implement a nontransferrable lottery system to get classic plates for them. The amount of pollution these few tens of thousands of vehicles put out being used a couple of times a month is a drop in the bucket compared to everything else that continues to get a pass.

Why not start banning camp fires? What about old boats? Stationary power units? These all seem to get a pass and probably dwarf the emissions of classic cars being used occasionally.

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)
in reply to acchariya

Storing cars is also devastating for the environment and society. We have as much land and resources devoted to housing cars as we do to housing people. I've seen so many houses that have garages as big as their house + a paved driveway + each city needs 3 publicly funded parking spots per car.

We need less cars. There simply isn't a future were we beat climate change without getting the majority of people to take trains, buses, and bikes


in reply to Onno (VK6FLAB)

Given how crucial to exposing government misconduct FOI requests are in the UK, I imagine this is a path you very much don't want to go down.

I first thought this was talking about the UK government, as I wouldn't put it past them to try and push something like this through. I'm both sad and relieved it's our Australian cousins going through it instead.




in reply to WindAqueduct

You're falling into your doom, and suddenly an advertiser materializes next to you and asks if you've already heard of their new internet banking accounts for minors. The situation is so ridiculous that you realize it's a dream, and you can fly. You start flying, but suddenly you get a popup: "Flying is a premium feature; upgrade now!" You try to get a free trial, but the popup insists that you already used one with this e-mail address, so you try to subscribe to the premium plan. Suddenly your card declines, and you return to falling down, crying as more and more advertisers spawn around you, showing you random things.
Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)



The Ongoing Fallout from a Breach at AI Chatbot Maker Salesloft – Krebs on Security


in reply to Onno (VK6FLAB)

Posted by the hackers:

Dear Google, please please pretty please continue to attack them.
I so wanna see the fuck getting destroyed out of you







Gilbert Doctorow: China, Russia & India Build New World Order