Salta al contenuto principale



FOIA records reveal EPA leaders frequent meetings with industry lobbyists


in reply to Pro

How long until FOIA gets shut down?
in reply to captainastronaut

It would have to be repealed by Congress. The main problem is enforcing it against a regime that regularly flouts the law, especially when there's not a lot of oversight to ensure they're fully in compliance when they do "comply."

They don't have to repeal it. They only need to pretend to participate.



Australian Government refuses to release climate security report


in reply to silence7

They know what's coming and they plan to deal with it using guns and walls.


in reply to Kami

I do not agree with those people. I'm saying that the presence and existence of queer people is what they call "activism" and I kind of didn't think I had to explicitly say that it's bullshit.




in reply to Track_Shovel

The best use I have for LLMs is to copy those entire comments into one with a prompt to respond to them in complete disagreement, and then say "really? When I asked ChatGPT it said this" and paste the response in.
in reply to Track_Shovel

If you set up a permanent instruction to be fact based, sourced, show how sure it is and no people pleasing it performs a lot better and it doesn't casually lie anymore.



BP is out. Here’s what’s next for the climate movement at Princeton


in reply to silence7

Further, Carbon Mitigation Initiative helped BP legitimize its core business of fossil fuel production. For example, one CMI leader gave recommendations to fossil fuel executives about developing carbon capture technologies — a strategy used by oil companies to delay the transition to renewables — that could “enable the full use of fossil fuels across the energy transition and beyond.” We published a report last year that further detailed the harms this relationship caused.

BP’s departure indicates an abdication of environmental action across sectors. Amid global pullback from environmental pledges, the company appears to have reckoned that it does not need to worry about public opposition to inaction on climate change. In the run-up to its separation from the University, the company ditched its renewable energy pledges and doubled down on oil and gas projects, exemplifying a broader “green retreat” taking place across the private sector. The federal government under President Trump has also reversed course on climate action, tearing down renewable energy programs and dismantling climate research — including at Princeton.



The Unbearable Inefficiency of Fossil Fuels





in reply to QuadDamage

If you exclude the billionaires and everyone else manages their footprint, we'd still go to hell in a hand basket because of just how much influence the billionaires club has on the climate.

Regulate the billionaires before telling the rest of us to doing sustainable activities.




in reply to silence7

Last sentence of the article:

ending our addiction to fossil fuels will further benefit the climate and our health. Do we have the balls to do it?
in reply to silence7

Great article, well written and sourced. Shame most of the people in power are paid not to care.


Mass Walkout Leaves UN General Assembly Chamber Mostly 'Empty' for Netanyahu Speech


cross-posted from: ibbit.at/post/65009

From Common Dreams via this RSS feed







How Bill Gates is playing both sides of the climate crisis – video


Think Bill Gates is fixing the climate crisis? Not if you follow the money. While he funds green innovation and talks about cutting emissions, Gates also invests in dirty industries such as coal, oil and private jets. In this episode, Neelam Tailor exposes how one of the world’s most powerful climate voices is betting on both sides of the crisis – and making a lot of money in the process
in reply to dumnezero

Both? Both sides? Both sides of the climate crisis? My dudes, nobody gets to go live on the Sun under its protection, not even with all the money. There's one side to the climate crisis, and we're all on it.

Oh, I see. He's making money pretending to invest in green technologies, and he's making money polluting the environment. That's the "both sides" they meant. Except those two industries are still both on the same side of the equation. It's like we're all on the Titanic, and Gates is spreading towels over deck chairs AND sitting at a table by the bar, like "Oh no! A guy with all the money is being greedy and dishonest. What should we do?"

in reply to themeatbridge

Not quite. When you're very rich, you can live the rest of your life in comfort. You and your children won't feel the effects of climate change.
in reply to jol

Depends on the severity and the speed of the collapse, but point taken.
Questa voce è stata modificata (1 mese fa)
in reply to themeatbridge

Sure. But even catastrophic things like pandemics were easy to handle for the billionaire class. As long as they can import food and water from anywhere in the world, they can afford it. There's always going to be places on earth that can still grow food, at least for the next generation.
in reply to dumnezero

He’s a billionaire, why would I ever think he’s ethical? Labor exploitation is an abhorrent thing to do so I have just always assumed he’s doing stuff for more money if he has the ability to sell out him species like that in the first place.

in reply to j_roby

Cops are hella incompetent. Any success they have is almost always because someone talked.

Source: absolutely any “true crime” show.

So, SHUT THE FUCK UP. This isn’t CSI. They’re lazy af and they will LIE TO YOU. So, SHUT THE FUCK UP.



Composting


From a science diagrams that look like shitposts community I follow on Facebook
in reply to Track_Shovel

Just a bit of extra horror for you: someone I used to know who stabled horses professionally told me that most of the bodies end up being sold to maggot farms. There was a maggot farm near us which had warehouses containing tile-lined troughs several meters long and wide - they looked just like swimming pools but, y'know, full of maggots - and they'd put the carcass in them for the maggots to feast on. If the horse's owners wanted something to bury they'd (brace yourself) cut off the horse's hooves and head and bury those.
in reply to Track_Shovel

Maggot farming is the act of growing maggots for industry. It is distinct from vermicomposting, as no separate composting process is occurring and maggots are used to consume flesh, rather than earthworms to consume plant-based materials. Maggots are most heavily cultivated as a source of animal feed for livestock or fish.
in reply to Madison420

I really didn't know that. What livestock feeds are they in?
in reply to Track_Shovel

I feel oddly proud that this is from my local university. Not sure why.

in reply to silence7

I mean yeah, makes sense. Trump put a climate change denier and oil lobbyist in charge of the EPA (Lee Zeldin).

Just sharing this list of the most damaging people to the world by pushing climate change denial. Please share far and wide, and do with it what you will.



in reply to Duamerthrax

Just hoping you are good faith here.

No they aren't. Charlie Kirk was a really important fascist platform creator, he wasn't a plant, he created the platform and then sold it. It is important to understand the enemy.

in reply to Corelli_III

He was either being funded since the beginning or started being funded when he became popular. The difference is immaterial.








Federal vs Local Control: What does Trumps Crackdown on D.C. Law Enforcement look like?


What do clashes like this tell us about the balance between public safety, local autonomy, and executive power in the U.S.?

"In August of 2025, President Trump invoked Section 740 of the D.C. Home Rule Act, declaring a ‘public safety emergency’ in Washington, D.C after citing rampant crime. Under this order, he could place the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) under federal control for 30 days. Between August 11 and September 10, over 2,000 National Guard troops were deployed alongside local forces to patrol the streets. During this time, over 40% of the arrests made in D.C. were immigration-related."



Federal vs Local Control: What does Trumps Crackdown on D.C. Law Enforcement look like?


What do clashes like this tell us about the balance between public safety, local autonomy, and executive power in the U.S.?
"In August of 2025, President Trump invoked Section 740 of the D.C. Home Rule Act, declaring a ‘public safety emergency’ in Washington, D.C after citing rampant crime. Under this order, he could place the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) under federal control for 30 days. Between August 11 and September 10, over 2,000 National Guard troops were deployed alongside local forces to patrol the streets. During this time, over 40% of the arrests made in D.C. were immigration-related."