The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has rejected a proposal by the International Air Transport Association (IATA) to raise the mandatory retirement age for commercial airline pilots from 65 to 67, citing concerns around aviation safety and age-related health risks.
The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has rejected a proposal by the International Air Transport Association (IATA) to raise the mandatory retirement age for commercial airline pilots from 65 to 67, citing concerns around aviation safe…
Salesforce has confirmed that it will not negotiate with or pay a ransom to the threat actors behind a massive wave of data theft attacks that impacted the company's customers this year.
Friend of mine was dating a neuroscience PhD in Syndey, Australia. When they met, he was near flat broke and moved in just to help defray the cost of rent.
A couple years later, he was approached by a Chinese recruiter that offered him a $2M signing bonus and a $1.5M salary to move to Tsinghua University and join their $10M/year neuroscience program. They literally don't know what to do with all the money and mostly continue to live these modest lives with comically oversized bank accounts. He gets to play with cutting edge equipment alongside a sizeable staff. She takes care of a small house in the country and raises bunnies for fun.
The OP to me was framing it in a way that "China Bad", and that sort of thought terminating rhetoric is what gets us into terrible situations in the first place.
Calling out that two western "bastions" of democracy like the US and UK are going through similar struggles right now, re-frames the comment to show how silly calling out China for this as if western countries don't also have their flavor of the same thing, really is.
Every country has their problems. Saying China doesn't let you say bad things about China so that's why you shouldn't live in a country that pays for your healthcare, ensures its people aren't starving, has a great educational system, amazing public transportation, is investing heavily in STEM, and is paying a wild salary rate while you're there; is just a silly comment because there's a lot of countries that don't let you do that now, with more popping up every day.
The UK has never been a bastion of democracy. Lmfao. They still have a house of lords for Christ's sake.
is just a silly comment because there's a lot of countries that don't let you do that now, with more popping up every day.
It's not a silly comment. You shouldn't move to fascist countries, period, nor give them an edge. No one should support fascism. How is that hard to understand?
China for this as if western countries don't also have their flavor of the same thing, really is.
while it is trending there in 2(two) of the "western" countries, china is there. Don't support places that are fascist. Don't move to places that are fascist. With democracy dead in the states, avoid it, don't move there, don't support it. Avoid buying products from fascist countries. Avoid buying their oil.
Trump is hell bent on accelerating China's way to the top. Except in many aspects they are no longer on the way, they are already there, so what Trump is doing, is also helping China increase their lead. Many think China is still just a low level production hub for the world. But the reality is that China is already outsourcing production to neighboring countries, and China is now among the world leaders in 8 out of 10 key industries for the future, unmatched by any other country or EU.
They just have so many people. They could replace entire major foreign industries and still have people left over.
Couple that with a government willing to do whatever infrastructure and monitary policy and you end up with a ton of growth.
The US may have just had a corporate takeover and will end probably end up looking more like China or Russia going forward.
There are a lot of natural resources here and if you're not particularly concerned with the local environment or economy, you could probably get a lot done.
I also can't imagine a future without China having the largest consumer class going forward and that probably represents a valuable market.
Yes more than USA and EU combined, but it used to not help much, because they were so far behind. The progress for the past half century is really remarkable by any standard.
Couple that with a government willing to do whatever infrastructure and monetary policy
China has absolutely been killing it on developing infrastructure and education for half a century. But despite that, authoritarian states, like dictatorships and the 1 party system of China belong to, usually never has that or really can leverage it even if they have decent policies. Because it usually turns out to be a matter of working for the oligarchs, and working for the oligarchs is generally little different than working for the Mafia, and that stifles development. But somehow they've made it work in China.
if you’re not particularly concerned with the local environment or economy, you could probably get a lot done.
In some regards they are doing more for the environment than USA. I'm not sure what you mean by not caring about the economy, because they absolutely do. But they have a different perspective on it that seems more like Europe than American. I think what EU is to USA is what China is to Europe in that regard. In China they look more at the big picture, while USA is very focused on the money here and now.
going forward and that probably represents a valuable market.
They already do, in many respects China is already the biggest market, in for instance Mobile phones, Electric vehicles, housing etc. China is already by far the biggest market. And for instance apart from Apple and Samsung being number 1 and 2, China has the next 8 biggest phone makers in the world, and Huawei actually was #1 at a point, until USA prevented them from using Android and the best chips.
What I'm really curious about is the coming mega projects China will probably be able to do, that will potentially far exceed what any other country is capable of. This can be both in engineering and science. USA did the atom bomb, integrated circuits, moon landing, Internet, and was a leader of democracy for making democracy the most popular form of governance. No doubt USA has had a historically huge impact on modern civilization, and I suspect we will see similar things from China in the future. Hopefully not so much like the Atom bomb, but more all the other stuff.
Why is the MAGA administration so hell bent on pushing China to the top as the global power?
I understand that Cluater B is going to Cluster B, that is how their wiring works. But why is everyone else around Trump supporting this agenda that only weakens and demeans the United States?
Something you need to understand about the Americans here is that they're not some scheming rats planning the most optimal way of bringing their autocratic future to bear through some hyperdimensional game of chess. They are idiots, all of them, with zero foresight, just reacting to things in impulsive, corrupt ways. The most foresight they have is displayed when they short stocks.
Greg Mello, director of the Los Alamos Study Group, which studies the US nuclear arsenal, stated that none of the current US or other countries' missile defense systems are capable of countering Russian non-ballistic nuclear weapons.
According to him, the US initiative to create the Golden Dome system is technically unfeasible. Mello noted that Russia possesses weapons such as the Poseidon underwater drone, hypersonic missiles, and cruise missiles, which are specifically designed to overcome missile defense systems.
He emphasized that instead of fanciful projects like Golden Dome, real arms control measures are needed to ensure mutual security.
There are classified programs that Greg Mello may or may not know about that are capable of countering all three of those weapons listed. There might also be classified Russian programs that are capable of countering those counters. And you can be sure we know at least something about those countering counters. Kill Chain analysis has been a huge focus area for the last few years, so the US military has developed ways to counter threats.
Golden Dome is still a wildly expensive, fanciful, and technically infeasible program. Even if we know exactly how to detect and counter these threats, the US is a gigantic fucking country with TONS of border to enclose. It's one thing to have a way to detect, track, target, and shoot down one of those three things. It's another to do that for 40 at the same time in wildly different areas of the world (made up number since I have no idea how many weapons Russia is able to unleash). It's a lot easier to protect an area the size of New Jersey than it is to protect the entire US.
No, I get that, wasn't trying to slap you down. I'm just adding emphasis to your (very good) argument by demonstrating just how far you were lowballing your estimate (ie, just how generous you were being).
Hypersonics, at least, are likely overrated. They reduce the window between detection and countermeasure deployment. They also can't maneuver very well without losing their hypersonic speed or generating too much heat, and therefore travel on a predictable course.
Drones have been the champion technology of the Ukraine war, and that's probably the future. Of course, those are also a reason why a Golden Dome plan wouldn't work.
the Iron Dome, which is what trump wants to install (and calls the Golden Dome) was never meant to stop ICCBM missiles. It's a system designed to catch the relatively short ranged rockets being used by Hamas and other missiles.
Trump is a moron.
To put the system into perspective, Israel has about 8,500 square miles of landmass. the US? 3.2 million.
It's actually so much worse than that, as the article explains.
Iron Dome was the inspiration, but with Golden Dome what they're planning is space based interception. It's Reagan's Star Wars project back from the dead.
The problem with this is two fold; no known system in the world can reliably intercept ICBMs, and doing so from space is ludicrously expensive. It costs, in effect, about ten times as much to shoot down one ICBM as it does to build an launch one, meaning that a peer adversary can just build more missiles and flood the system. To stop even a Hundred ICBMs would cost hundreds of billions of dollars. China has six hundred.
Basically, like so much of what Trump spends money on, it will amount to a very expensive but completely useless toy.
They probably* don’t even have launch vehicles for the warheads they do have. That particular branch of their military isnextremely corrupt, with people selling everything they could off on the black market. Including, apparently, launch fuel.
I would find it surprising if they could mass produce them in any meaningful quantity.
(*not something I’m willing to bet on, to be clear. This is one of those plan for the worst case. The worst case is probably they sold off a portion of warheads to the highest bidder a la Sum of All Fears but the rest are all operational.)
The best hope if Russia decides to deploy nuclear weapons, is probably that those are expensive to maintain, and Russian corruption is likely to have made a portion of them unworkable.
I swear to fucking god if they do this, actually name it "Golden Dome," so I have to think about this fascist piece of orange shit every time it is mentioned, for years to come, I'm going to lose it.
I just want nothing more than to never have to read about this piece of human detritus ever again.
Greg Mello, director of the Los Alamos Study Group, which studies the US nuclear arsenal, stated that none of the current US or other countries’ missile defense systems are capable of countering Russian non-ballistic nuclear weapons.
Interesting. Can we have a link to this? It's not in the article.
Hmm, so that's a civilian think tank. The name had me thinking it might be somewhat official.
Historically, interception has been a pipe dream, but in the 21st century complexity is cheap. I do worry a little that it's not as far fetched as it sounds, and MAD might break down.
Could someone explain to me why this matters? If they have this amazing weaponry, why aren’t they deploying it against Ukraine? If it’s so great that war would have been over in 3 days as originally promised. Sounds to me like some stupid Boogeyman talk.
"You better believe we have weapons you can't defend from, like, at all! We could totally take on NATO, easily. So like, don't, like, even think about helping Ukraine any more!"
Russia (and/or the Soviet Union) has been doing variations of that to Finland since WWII.
That's basically why it took us so fucking long to join NATO, because the argument used to be "uuuh, we can't afford to piss off Russia!"
But since they obviously don't care about their own capacity for war and invaded Ukraine, we thought, "fuck it, why not".
So Russia used to have a bit of a buffer with Finland but since we joined, Putler is having even more heatenings.
Thus this sort of saber rattling.
Seeing as we're on .ml I wouldn't be surprised if Davel or Dessalines or one of the others just deletes this as some sort of anti-Russian discrimination and bans me.
Oh and just to remind Vanja. Don't try to come over our Eastern border. #(Unless you're alone and escaping Putlerism, but you should do that before the remining is done.)*
Profitez des vidéos et de la musique que vous aimez, mettez en ligne des contenus originaux, et partagez-les avec vos amis, vos proches et le monde entier.
If they have this amazing weaponry, why aren’t they deploying it against Ukraine?
because they can beat the shit out of ukr civilians every night for cheap. hypersonic weapons are expensive.
the underwater drones: well ukraine basically sunk their navy in the black sea, so probably not there...
they did use some cruise missiles early in the conflict, but again, expensive compared to shaheeds and other shitty terror drone weapon platforms. when you're bombing apartments you don't need pinpoint accuracy.
I'd also wager they don't have very many of the fancy weapons ready at any given time, and reserve them for conflict against other nuclear powers.
remember, russia has always underestimated ukraine in this fight, at the very beginning the invaders brought their dress uniforms because they were told they'd be marching in victory parades in just a few days.
in short, I don't think these weapons would be all that useful against ukraine but poland and denmark might see some action if things continue to escalate. or if Ukraine starts landing significant hits against moscow itself.
Russia has lifted its moratorium on the deployment of intermediate- and shorter-range missiles, paving the way for the deployment of the Oreshnik system in Belarus. This is a response to the growth of NATO missile forces in Europe and the changing strategic balance.
The Oreshnik is a ballistic missile with a range of up to 5,500 km and hypersonic warheads (up to Mach 10), virtually invulnerable to missile defenses and equipped with decoys. Deployment in Belarus reduces the flight time to Europe by 3-4 minutes, threatening key NATO facilities, including NATO headquarters in Brussels.
Russia believes the collapse of the arms control system is a consequence of the actions of the US and its allies. The deployment of the Oreshnik system in Belarus is a necessary measure to restore the strategic balance.
The Belarusian Ministry of Defense explained that the West's hype surrounding the deployment of Russian tactical nuclear weapons and the Oreshnik system is due to their role as a strategic deterrent. Deputy Chief of the General Staff of the Belarusian Armed Forces Viktor Tumar noted that these weapons are intended for use only in extreme cases, but their very existence discourages adversaries from aggressive plans.
He emphasized that the presence of tactical nuclear weapons and the Oreshnik system allows Minsk to avoid an arms race and preserve funds for social programs. According to Tumar, the West, on the contrary, is increasing its military presence and reducing social spending.
The Rubezh/Oreshnik/Whatever you want to call it exists as less than 10 missiles. And of those, already two have been used. They were made almost 20 years ago and include components whose production was ended in 1990's and can no longer be produced by any factory in any country. The only reason Lukašenka is talking about the Rubezh missiles is that Putin wants to scare us into giving Ukraine to the Russia. I haven't really seen any western hype of the Rubezh in the way Lukašenka talks about.
And furthermore: Rubezh is a type of missile that is banned by international agreements on reducing the nuclear danger. That the Russia has held to almost ten of those for several decades tells a lot about how dangerous the Russia is. While others have stopped using such mid-range ballistic missiles and have scrapped them, the Russia had just hidden them. And now has dug them back out and put the laber "Oreshnik" on them. Them having launched already two of their Rubezh (or Oreshnik, if you prefer that name) tells that they only use them for the purpose of scaring. If they really planned to use them for something serious, they would not launch one fifth of them without nuclear warheads as they have done now.
A cheater country, such as the Russia is, must fall.
you want to call it exists as less than 10 missiles. And of those, already two have been used.
maybe you give me source?
They were made almost 20 years ago and include parts whose production was ended in 1990’s and can no longer be produced by any factory in any country.
You idiot. Sorry, but its real fact.
Rubezh is a type of missile that is banned by international agreements on reducing the nuclear danger. That the Russia has held to almost ten of those for several decades tells a lot about how dangerous the Russia is. While others have stopped using such mid-range ballistic missiles and have scrapped them, the Russia had just hidden them.
you want to call it exists as less than 10 missiles. And of those, already two have been used.
maybe you give me source?
This is the first thing that I found with a quick internet search. It'll give you enough pointers to find the rest of the information, I'm sure! So, here goes: eurasiantimes.com/russias-game…
And then: There were blog posts analyzing the debris of the Rubezh missile launched back in November and December 2024. The debris shows that it is not a new development. It cannot be directly proven that the Oreshnik and Rubezh are the same missile, because Rubezh, being against treaties signed by USSR, was a very secret project, of which only very little information leaked. But, the debris shows that the "Oreshnik" missiles were made around when we know Rubezh had been made. And they are missiles for the same purpose. It's unlikely that the Russia would have developed two separate missile types for the same purpose at the same time.
No, but it forces the issue of Israel intentionally terror-starving Palestinians to come back up and Israel can't help but self-own by calling aid organizations Hamas
Are the flotilla recognised as legal humanitarian aid providers? I understand from other threads that Israel is legally required to allow humanitarian aid through. I assume here this would mean recognized humanitarian aid. Else it would be akin to just random people trying to run a blockade without a legally recognized reason, which would not put the IDF in the 'legal' wrong.
Their subsequent treatment of the flotilla and it's crew is something else to discuss of course
I don't even know if there's such a thing as 'legal humanitarian aid' as opposed to an 'illegal' one.
“Legal” who is enforcing these international laws that we can all see Israel breaking? Think about this situation as how colonialist America legally took over all of the Native American land and exterminated them “legally”. It is the same story. Meanwhile Israeli settlers enjoy free universal healthcare and schooling the United States funds.
It’s just so weird to give a fuck about how other people choose to live their lives with a literal child molester and human trafficker in the White House, a protected British royal child molester and a rapist on the Supreme Court. It’s really sick. Just let peaceful people exist in their own way. The gender role structure of how people should act and feel is all based on colonialist pseudoscience.
No no, Israel are only allowing aid providers that they are okay with into Palestine. This means going directly through Israel's singular entry system, which through a joint program with the US called USAID, takes the aid and trickle feeds the food and occasional blankets to a relatively small group of Palestinians. It is thoroughly controlled. Letting humanitarian aid access via any other means would mean Palestinians actually receive life-saving care.
Don't forget that the purpose of the mass murder of Palestinians is the same as it was 3,500 years ago, and hasn't changed since Israel was created by England in 1948 to facilitate the mass migration of Jews: To completely erase the Palestinian people and have the Land their god Promised. Israelites - that is to say, Zionists who believe in stopping at nothing to establish an ethnically cleansed Israel - are, and always have been, a horrible, murderous colony. They are the root cause of the common knowledge that religion is the largest scapegoat of historical violence. Hell, the word 'scapegoat' originates from the ancient Hebrew ritual of superficially absolving a community's sense of guilt for their sins.
Standing question as to how far they'd get. With Italian and Turkish support, there was some amount of speculation as to whether the IDF would risk a shooting war with a NATO state over a handful of civilian protesters doing an aquatic sit-in.
What's extra crazy is that they're being arrested 80 miles off the coast in international waters, dragged into Israel, forced at gunpoint to sign deportation orders, and then being forced out again. That is, of course, assuming none of the soldiers decide to kill one or more of them along the way.
No but now there will be massive strikes in Spain and Italy that will shut down a bunch of stuff. Boycotting and sanctioning a country is a step by step process and this pours a lot of fuel on the fire that is the international anger at Israel.
The smart move would've been to make the boat that Thunberg is on a decoy, and put all of the aid on other ships. Let them target her while the actual aid slips past.
Notice that it is a for-profit corporation which decides what the final price of the vaccine is going to be,
AND what its availability is going to be,
whereas this SHOULD have been a straight-up strategic global-security decision, to opensource the thing, & make the license viral, like GPL, so that all derivatives also be libre..
& if private/for-profit-industry wouldn't develop it under those terms, then buy some company & manufacture it ourselves, for sake of stopping a functional "zombie apocalypse" in the making.
When the English intentionally infected ships-of-goods with smallpox, in order to extinguish as much of the American Indian population as they could, its death-rate was MASSIVELY multiplied by the rude fact that everybody was afflicted at the same time:
no carers left!
The same logic is going to happen when a both-highly-transmissable-and-highly-lethal ebola variant breaks out.
( covid's transmissability & lethality have been all over the place, chaotically, but anybody who remembers how covid-alpha & covid-delta had high lethality, but covid-omicron was mild & had high-transmissibility, knows,
you HAVE to identify those 2 attributes distinctly, & not ignore their effects, when assessing threat-to-our-populations!
& pretending otherwise, overly-dumbing-things-down, has cost medical-credibility, which itself costs lives, at whole-population-scale )
That privatization-of-ebola-vaccine is going to cost millions of lives, when, not if, ebola breaks-out, as all viruses do, in globalized-economies, eventually.
Warring for the wrong goal, winning the battle, in a way that costs the entire war.
In a major breakthrough for the digital rights movement, the German government has refused to back the EU's controversial Chat Control regulation today after facing massive public pressure. This blocks the required majority in the EU Council, derailing the plan to pass the surveillance law next week
I'm looking for federated Q&A forums specifically focused on Linux and software-related issues. I'm not referring to platforms like NodeBB, Discourse, Lemmy, Kbin, PieFed, etc. I'm asking for specific instances that focus on Q&A about Linux and other software related issues. I know of some popular non-federated platforms like Stack Exchange, AskUbuntu, Arch Linux Forum, etc. But I'm particularly interested in federated sites.
If you have any recommendations for such forums, please share them! Thank you!
Forum Internet, Czas Działać! from Poland, not specifically Linux, but rather software privacy and consumer rights (made by a privacy rights advocate organisation)
I've been thinking about adding Q&A features to PieFed for a while... Initially just the ability to set a comment as the solution to a post and then give that comment more emphasis in the UI. What else do we need? Maybe display the number of solution comments on peoples profile.
Honestly, I wouldn’t recommend adding the feature to mark comments as solutions. Websites like StackOverflow often have many answers that aren’t the best marked as solutions, and I believe platforms like Codidact have learned from those mistakes.
Reputation is a key factor that motivates people to contribute answers. However, StackOverflow suffers from over-moderation due to the reputation gained from moderating. I’m curious about how Codidact has addressed this issue.
Instead, consider allowing users to mark questions as solved rather than comments. Implementing a voting system similar to Slashdot, where users can categorize responses as helpful, funny, or other descriptors, might be more effective. This way, contributors are incentivized to help, as they can gain reputation points. Then a leaderboard showcasing the most helpful contributors on a weekly or monthly basis could further encourage participation.
Feature
Description
Benefits
User Profiles with Reputation Points
Allow users to earn points for asking questions, providing answers, and receiving upvotes.
Encourages participation and rewards knowledgeable contributors.
Question Marking System
Enable users to mark questions as solved, rather than comments.
Simplifies the process of identifying resolved queries.
Voting System
Implement a voting mechanism for answers (e.g., helpful, insightful, etc.).
Helps surface the best answers and encourages quality contributions.
Leaderboards
Create weekly or monthly leaderboards showcasing top contributors.
Fosters competition and motivates users to engage more actively.
Categorization and Tagging
Allow users to categorize questions and tag them for easier navigation.
Improves searchability and organization of content.
Search Functionality
Develop a robust search feature that allows users to find questions and answers quickly.
Enhances user experience by making information easily accessible.
[Derek] When Watts dug deeper, he realized that the network structure did matter. In the more clustered networks, people were more likely 30:27 to copy each other. So if by chance someone started out cooperating, then everyone would cooperate. 30:34 But it was equally likely that someone would start out by defecting, in which case everyone else would defect. 30:40 And over all the games they played, these two effects canceled each other out, which is why it seemed like 30:46 the network structure didn't matter. - [Duncan] It's sort of on a knife edge, right? Where like one person does something selfish 30:54 and everything goes south. In another world, everybody kind of holds it together 31:00 and everything goes well. It's crazy that the world could be like on a knife edge like that, you know, 31:06 could tip one way or the other, kind of just depends on how someone gets out of bed that day. 31:11 But then Watts realized something. See, in real life, you can choose who you hang out with. 31:17 So he reran the experiment allowing players to change who they were playing with. And this time he used the prisoner's dilemma 31:23 so that players could easily identify the defectors. - [Derek] And the finding was clear, the more you allowed players 31:30 to choose who they were playing with, the more likely they were to cooperate
Could federated social media networks enhance cooperative behavior between everyone, relative to both insular and massively popular services?
[Derek] When Watts dug deeper, he realized that the network structure did matter. In the more clustered networks, people were more likely 30:27 to copy each other. So if by chance someone started out cooperating, then everyone would cooperate. 30:34 But it was equally likely that someone would start out by defecting, in which case everyone else would defect. 30:40 And over all the games they played, these two effects canceled each other out, which is why it seemed like 30:46 the network structure didn't matter. - [Duncan] It's sort of on a knife edge, right? Where like one person does something selfish 30:54 and everything goes south. In another world, everybody kind of holds it together 31:00 and everything goes well. It's crazy that the world could be like on a knife edge like that, you know, 31:06 could tip one way or the other, kind of just depends on how someone gets out of bed that day. 31:11 But then Watts realized something. See, in real life, you can choose who you hang out with. 31:17 So he reran the experiment allowing players to change who they were playing with. And this time he used the prisoner's dilemma 31:23 so that players could easily identify the defectors. - [Derek] And the finding was clear, the more you allowed players 31:30 to choose who they were playing with, the more likely they were to cooperate
Profitez des vidéos et de la musique que vous aimez, mettez en ligne des contenus originaux, et partagez-les avec vos amis, vos proches et le monde entier.
[Derek] When Watts dug deeper, he realized that the network structure did matter. In the more clustered networks, people were more likely 30:27 to copy each other. So if by chance someone started out cooperating, then everyone would cooperate. 30:34 But it was equally likely that someone would start out by defecting, in which case everyone else would defect. 30:40 And over all the games they played, these two effects canceled each other out, which is why it seemed like 30:46 the network structure didn't matter. - [Duncan] It's sort of on a knife edge, right? Where like one person does something selfish 30:54 and everything goes south. In another world, everybody kind of holds it together 31:00 and everything goes well. It's crazy that the world could be like on a knife edge like that, you know, 31:06 could tip one way or the other, kind of just depends on how someone gets out of bed that day. 31:11 But then Watts realized something. See, in real life, you can choose who you hang out with. 31:17 So he reran the experiment allowing players to change who they were playing with. And this time he used the prisoner's dilemma 31:23 so that players could easily identify the defectors. - [Derek] And the finding was clear, the more you allowed players 31:30 to choose who they were playing with, the more likely they were to cooperate
Profitez des vidéos et de la musique que vous aimez, mettez en ligne des contenus originaux, et partagez-les avec vos amis, vos proches et le monde entier.
Greece is one of the most corrupt countries in Europe. They don't respect driving laws. They openly throw trash in the streets. They smoke right in front of "Please don't smoke here" signs. The Greek politicians are completely corrupt. But these Greek politicians didn't fall from a sky. They are a reflection of Greek society.
Why do I say this ? Because my country faces similar issues.
Greece is one of the most corrupt countries in Europe. They don’t respect driving laws. They openly throw trash in the streets. They smoke right in front of “Please don’t smoke here” signs.
For pedantry's sake, these aren't examples of corruption. In order for it to be "corruption," there has to be someone in a position of power who is misusing their power. ::: spoiler definition [0] "Corruption is a form of dishonesty or a criminal offense that is undertaken by a person or an organization that is entrusted in a position of authority to acquire illicit benefits or abuse power for one's gain." (wikipedia)). :::
Some examples of corruption would be:
Bribing a public servant to get better service (link)
Mate, I've lived and worked in several countries in Europe and come from a country - Portugal - which in many ways is culturally very similar to Greece, at least judging by conversations I had with Greek friends and colleagues over the years.
In my experience and view, Politics in general, including government, are definitelly the result of what a society considers "normal" and this doesn't apply to just the Southern European countries but also in my own experience to Western and Northern European ones.
Strictly speaking and as you say they are not the same, it's more of one being a reflection of the other: what politicians get away with reflects society's idea of "normal" and things like the cultural view on how strictly people should follow rules: in a country where the idea that "following rules is for suckers" is widespread, Politicians too will not tend to "stay within the rules" with the powers they've been entrusted with.
So for example, Corruption is Portugal is IMHO the natural reflection of a culture where Cronyism is widespread and pretty much standard all over the place (and, if you think about it, the Moral distance from "trading favours with paying strangers using the power entrusted to you" to "trading favours with friends using the power entrusted to you" is a lot less than the Moral distance to "thinking one has the responsability to not abuse power entrusted to oneself for one's own gain directly or indirectly") and the Law is seen as indicative rather than a set of boundaries that shouldn't be crossed (except when it comes to violence).
Interestingly and paradoxically, when things do start to change, acceptance of Corruption falls and and the fight against Corruption improves, the Perception of Corruption goes up because there are many more people being caught and convicted for Corruption and that ends up in the News, so it looks like there is more Corruption than before due to more News about it, when it's actually the opposite.
At the very least, the word can be used figuratively to describe the decay and breakdown of social fabric. Personally I find it refreshing to hear an entire society held accountable, not just a few mustache twirling villains at the top.
That’s not just pedantry, that’s unnecessarily narrow-minded. Ever heard of the corrupted heart? According to your definition, that’s an impossibility, unless the heart belongs to someone in authority, or something, I guess.
The point is, there is more than a single interpretation of things, and there is not a singular definition of corruption. Anyone can be corrupted, and giving examples that show that lawlessness permeates every level of society is a great way of showing that corruption is likely endemic in the culture.
I like how you cast everyday breakdown of social fabric as “corruption.” We usually only apply that word to leaders but you’re right it can pervade every level.
Once "the people" seize the means of production, how will it be run & organized? We might need some people to coordinate between other people. What will these coordinators be called? And what if they abuse their positions? We might need some people that keep coordinators accountable, that audit their behavior, we can call them auditors....
If you aren't getting where I am going with this, I will just say that while your sentiment might make sense to you, this is a real problem for you to think about. Seizing the means of production is meaningless without a mechanism by which to run it. As soon as you trust other human beings with that ability, you create another class with authority, and thus, the road leads back to exactly where you are.
AI will not fix this because it is centralized compute trained on oppressive data. Perhaps if the data centers were publicly owned and the data was vetted, there would be a better chance, but more likely? It would be AI with human oversight....and yes, same problem again. If a human oversight committee exists, that is once again a human authority position that can be abused. And it doesn't matter because the planet has foolishly relinquished control of compute power to a tiny minority.
While I believe we are slated for doom (that isn't so bad, there are much better realities than this one anyway), I'd at least like to see a tiny fraction of intelligent resistance. This has got to be the most disappointing apocalypse I've ever witnessed. All the tools are clearly laid out and we've collectively chosen to be miserable instead.
I was with you for the first half, but then you went off the rails. Anyone who seriously brings up AI in the discussion for what to do after the revolution is completely deluded. You act like it's a viable strategy with some issues, but really it'd be immediately worse than even Trump. Day 1 it'd hallucinate a war and try to release nukes around the world. As for the "better realities," we only get 1 planet and 1 reality. To try to bury your head in the sand with some dream that an alternate reality version of us is doing okay is nothing but a cop out. Maybe another version of our planet is doing well, but we're responsible for this one - it's our duty to protect it.
Yes, when we overthrow the government, we'll need to enact a new government to replace it, and yes, eventually that government will become corrupt and need overthrowing, too. When there exists a position of authority over others, evil people will inevitably worm their way in, but nevertheless, authority is necessary to have a functioning society. Governments are like clothes - you have to change them out every once in a while, ideally before they start to reek of filth.
Did you read what I said about AI? I don't think so, given your response. To simplify, as I skipped some steps, I was addressing some people who've thought about the problem slightly more than an iota. Some think AI systems that govern over humans could help address the human corruptibility / hierarchy problem. It does not.
There are an infinite set of realities. You can see them for yourself, but something tells me you'll continue onward in your lovely little cage.
Not directly, but once the law allows for it, employers start demanding it. Individual workers have very little bargaining power to refuse at that point. So before you know it, the 13 hour day is normalized and labor protections have taken a knock back into 1920.
So people were not allowed to work 13 hours in 1 day up until now? The rule we have here (Denmark) is that we must have 11 hour rest period between 2 shifts. The normal work week is 37.5 hours, but if you want you can work 13 hours per day, since that gives you 11 hours rest.
We have some of the highest wages in Europe, possibly in part because of flexible regulation, mostly negotiated directly between unions and employers. Denmark is also one of the easiest countries to fire people in EU, but we have one of the lowest unemployment rates. The fact that it's easy to fire, also makes it easy to make a decision to try to expand or start new projects. If it goes wrong, damage control can be relatively swift, and not break the company if it fails.
Are you getting paid overtime past 8 hours though? Because there's a big difference between getting double rates for those extra hours (incentivizing your boss to hire a second worker) and demanding everyone work double shifts for normal wages.
Yes of course people are paid for overtime, the article doesn't say anything about not being paid. I know in USA it's normal to not be paid for overtime, but USA is not a civilized country, I thought Greece was. Maybe people need to unionize more.
As a full time working US citizen this made me chuckle. It’s like a fairytale hearing about the kinds of protections and guarantees people in other countries get.
To us, USA is a dystopian example of what we don't want to become. It's really sad, because things were going really well, as in the right direction 50 years ago. And ironically MAGA is pulling even more in the opposite direction, pulling even further away from everything that was good about America in the 70's.
Greece is subject to post-program monitoring (PPM), focusing on its ability to repay the IMF, as a country which owes the fund more than 1.5 billion SDR or 200 percent of its quota.
The IMF's austerity policies were criticized as violating the Greek constitution and human rights.
He should make it interesting. Pledge, say, 300 billion to a number of humanitarian charities if he doesn't succeed in making a highly reviewed AI game in 2026. Put it in an escrow account in the meantime.
Well, you know what they say; Shoot for the Moon and you'll suffocate in space while everyone on Earth is left to deal with the repercussions of your horribly inefficient pollution-producing 'great' AI 'game.'
The 'peace deal' proposed is so bad on nearly every level and theyre only given 4 days to response and they've been threatened if they dont accept.
"Hamas would be forced to disarm and turn over power to a group of apolitical technocrats, supervised by an international body led by Trump and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair."
Yeah just want people want controlling them, right wing technocrats..
Con il repentino ingresso del Giappone nell’epoca moderna, successivamente all’apertura forzata dalle navi nere del Commodoro Perry a partire dal 1853 e la conseguente serie di sconvolgimenti sociali, amministrativi e culturali che portarono alla cad…
While a drone defense system is of course a mandatory requirement of modern warfare, the real solution is to ramp-up Ukraine's ability to strike russia.
Additoanly the EU really needs to implement their own hybrid warfare methods against the russians.
"This genocide and other genocides are being enabled and fueled by our own governments, our institutions, our media, and companies. It is our responsibility to end that complicity... to use our privileges, our platforms, to take a stance against this, that is in every way unjustifiable,” Thunberg asserted.
“I will never, ever comprehend how humans can be so evil that you would deliberately starve millions of people living trapped under an illegal siege as a continuation of decades and decades of suffocating oppression, apartheid, occupation,” she added.
Thunberg Confirms Abuse by Israeli Abductors, But Urges World to Focus on Gaza Genocide | Common Dreams
Brett Wilkins Oct 06, 2025
"This genocide and other genocides are being enabled and fueled by our own governments, our institutions, our media, and companies. It is our responsibility to end that complicity... to use our privileges, our platforms, to take a stance against this, that is in every way unjustifiable,” Thunberg asserted.
“I will never, ever comprehend how humans can be so evil that you would deliberately starve millions of people living trapped under an illegal siege as a continuation of decades and decades of suffocating oppression, apartheid, occupation,” she added.
"This genocide and other genocides are being enabled and fueled by our own governments, our institutions, our media, and companies. It is our responsibility to end that complicity."
You don't have to do shit that gets on national news to make a difference. Just being brave enough to go outside is the only requirement to help. Part of the reason Greta and others did this is so YOU take action how you can as well.
You don't have to be brave beyond going outside if you can't be. You can come join us at the next protest, vigil, sit-in, or even just learn more on a virtual meetup.
There are countless organizations but if you're in the US the easiest way to find out about events in general will be find your local PSL or DSA on Instagram (yeah I hate Instagram too but it is what it is). They aren't always the groups organizing activism but, in general, they will be promoting the events and that can help you find more specific groups in your area.
Just be aware of where the money you spend is going. Your power is as a consumer...so stop supporting companies, and nations, that oppose your worldview. It works.
She is right! Please focus on the victims and the actual perpetrators - the Israeli government and their army. NOT random jewish people. It's so maddening to see fellow leftists get sucked into antisemitism because they can't hold two ideas in their head like "The genocide in Gaza is wrong." as well as "Genociding Israel would be wrong". We are better than this goddammit!
That's always been their cover. Back 20+ years ago when I was protesting Israel's actions, I got called antisemitic so often, I finally stopped expressing opinions on it.
Yes what makes this different. Israel has been doing this kind of shit for decades and nobody cared. I guess it wasn't as public and they might be killing more publicly now.
See I don't know if you are being purposefully obtuse or maybe you really don't know. The Jewish faith and the Jewish ethnic group are two things that don't have to overlap.
Agreed, but (and I suppose this means Lemmy is smaller than I'd like) I've seen this dude posting similar "both sides", "we're doomed" etc etc etc shit.
Hope is always the last thing to die, but we've gotta be real and take action to fix things while it's still relatively easy to.
The UK just had a high profile synagogue attack on Yom Kippur. Not defending Israel, but a lot of the diasporia are being victimized because of the war.
Violence against both jews and muslims increased but they want you to only care about opposing hate against only one side. The end of occupation is the only solution
The eternal problem of activists: draw attention, but then direct it to your cause instead of your person. Not easy, especially for prominent ones and celebreties.
The AfD has failed to win three run-offs for mayor in major cities in Germany's west, despite other gains. Meanwhile, the German foreign minister is to visit Poland as tensions grow over Russia's aggression.
Chancellor Friedrich Merz's Christian Democrats emerged victorious in local elections in western Germany. Meanwhile, the German foreign minister is to visit Poland as tensions grow over Russia's aggression. DW has more.
Oh dear, Russia RussiaaAAA RUSSSSIAAAAAAAAAAA!!! Do people like you see anything that isn't caused by Russia? The "Putinist axis", what a wild imagination. Hey on the plus side you're never bored I guess.
It's a well-documented fact that there is a decades-long large scale state-sponsored effort of propagandists in St. Petersburg using bots and tens of thousands of fake accounts to push far-right propaganda narratives online which are aimed squarely at dividing western societies. They are on every platform, posing as concerned citizens, creating the illusion of a silent majority fed up with wokism or whatever the boogeyman is today. They've scored massive wins with their support for Brexit and MAGA, and have only doubled down on this strategy since.
So the question is, are you denying this or pretending it doesn't matter?
I am obviously not saying it's all Russia and things would be fine otherwise, so don't even go there.
What is the quantity of information posted every day to the internet, what quantity of information does it take for one person to just go from one day to the next to shoot up the neighborhood? And how do you know beforehand? Because all this bot Russia conspiracy stuff is all ergo hoc propter hoc stuff.
If there existed such images or text, why didn't Hillary use this amazing technology to get people to vote for her?
It's always some shadowy, unproven, generic bad guy stuff, that somehow never ever applies to your own team.
It's like no matter what happens, it's all Russia. One day they're so powerful they can control the thoughts of an entirely peaceful and uniformly happy and rich country like the USA (insert villain laugh with Eastern European accent, twirling mustache), the next day they're all incompetent drunks with a weak military that uses a single CPU they stole from a washing machine. Oh and backwards technology, except for their brain beams.
You also remind me of all these "sky is falling" types when they find out I run Windows 7. I ask for specific, actionable evidence that my machine is vulnerable, and it's always just circular arguments or it happened to a friend of mine.
"I am obviously not saying it’s all Russia and things would be fine otherwise, so don’t even go there."
So don't go to reality? I see. You're just as bad as any loony 9/11 jet fuel conspiracy nutter, it's your identity.
"Uniformly happy and rich country like the US" ok lmao you're straight trolling with this one, good job.
"If the propaganda supports Trump, why didn't it support Hillary" because she's not fueling right-wing extremism. No one cares about Hillary Clinton or your outdated Windows, jeez. Hope you get well soon.
I think the death penalty is a bad policy overall and particularly bad in a court system that's largely a rubber stamp for the prosecutor.
At the same time, it is hard to pull together sympathy for a cartel so casual in their cruelty and brutal in their oppression.
I would like to believe there's a world in which all these people get the Jack Ma treatment, with varying lengths of time doing rice farming to give them all a taste of humility, and then they come back to society older and wiser and more peaceful. It's a shame we don't live in that place.
Ma is back in Alibaba HQ, ostensibly making executive decisions for the firm. That was all over the news a week or two ago and has been, in part, the reason for the stock's resurgence in price.
The CCP actually executes corrupt politicians quite often. It's one of the few things I can agree with them on. The issue is, if they can be trusted to grant fair trials. And then you have to ask how much can you trust an authoritarian government on really anything.
At least 69 people have been killed and dozens injured after a powerful 6.9 magnitude earthquake struck the central Philippines late on Tuesday.
The province of Cebu, which suffered the brunt of the damage, declared a state of calamity early on Wednesday, after thousands spent the night on the streets amid repeated aftershocks.
One Cebu resident told the BBC he was among them, adding that power and water supplies were cut off. He says the voices of crying children could be heard around him, adding that they were "traumatised".
A 40ft Bohemian? A five year old one will set you back €200k in good condition, and cost around 10% of its value in maintenance, mooring and repairs each year.
People have cars more expensive than that on their driveways.
Sweet just point me to that different job. I’m in central Maine. Since we’re being picky please find one that’s over 60k. I have 15 years in management, sales, compliance etc
Your point being? Would you like to mention the average rent of a one bedroom apartment? Or the median wage, or let me know what the available jobs are paying? Are you upset that we managed to raise our minimum wage? We also legalize cannabis. Have you done that in your shitty state yet?
No I’m pointing out that OP I was responding too people doesn’t understand the local economy’s of this nation. Maine had lots of seasonal work, lots of part time work, and lots of bad jobs. Could you please help by finding me a job that pays more than 20k a year??? In Maine????
Yes it’s just like owning a car! Which we primarily use to get to work and earn money to pay for the car!!! What do you do in a boat???? Oh ya!!! Not working and scoot around all day. Must be nice!
Lot's of people have hobby cars. I don't own a second car or a boat but I don't consider everyone who has one rich. Those people still go to work every day and save for retirement. We're talking about good wage job, not being a millionaire.
Right and I’m talking about how the good wage jobs have slowly disappeared over the last 20 years. I’m talking the devaluation of our currency and inflation of our necessities has not kept up with meager wage growth. They’re gonna offshore your job soon enough or replace you with AI. If you are still in the sailboat owning class, you are a demographic that’s getting more unobtainable to the non sailboat class. You don’t feel like you’re rich, but you were the net beneficiary of all of the subsidies and money printing of your own a house and a 401k.
What ever you feel like brother, we’re in a post constitutional law America. If you feel like the system is going to protect you from the people it hurts then I guess fight the poors, if not idk do anything in your power to fight for democracy and decency? I’m just a casual observer for now, but I’m more focused on the food supply chain than the obvious authoritarianism. Remember during Covid when people were hoarding toilet paper? Overcharging for masks? Idk about you but I’m working on my food production lol
Why would I fight for democracy if the masses see me as their enemy? That's what I mean. If everyone with more money they you (even wage workers) is the enemy than I guess I have to side with the system that protects me. What other choice do I have? Sacrifice my life for the good of the common people? Who am I? Prometheus?
Lmao: this country can’t even come together and agree that the richest 10,000 people can afford some austerity with the rest of us. I don’t think anyone needs to sacrifice their life for anything personally. I think we can all probably sacrifice some comforts for the sake of unity and equality, but I really think we can just sacrifice the billionaires, metaphorically I suppose. Or maybe we can just keep holding elections, voting more austerity for ourselves, more debt for our grand children, and more yachts for 0.000001%, and the promise that your kids won’t have to live like the second class citizens you have created.
Ok, so you're saying that it'a enough for me to support higher taxes for the rich and we'll be cool? The poor masses wont kill me in the class war even if I do have a yacht?
My friend. Any sane country should be worried about disenfranchising or starving a large portion of the population(>20%). I’m not going to be angry mobbing anyone. I’ll happily point the mob in the right direction tho ❤️ ya I would start focusing on voting on policy instead of party. I would figure out how to get the school lunches back on the tables. The food banks filled back up, the government oversight committees that protect citizens and consumers??? I wouldn’t sit around until regions have poisoned water supplies and you need nestle bottled water to survive? I would vote to stop accelerating these processes because it’s really fucking dangerous to everyone in the world.
A class war is just a cute thing the commies say. I’m just talking about civil disorder that comes with hungry people who can’t feed themselves. I’m not really talking about eating the rich. I’m talking about mass starvation across this country and complete breaking down of society. Anyone will look rich to a man who can’t afford food and clean water.
I'm noticing pretty much all issues with trade are issues with the management. They want to restrict and interfere with as many steps as possible so they can skim just a little bit 🤏 more off the top every time.
Speaking at a UN meeting on September 26 dedicated to the International Day for the Elimination of Nuclear Weapons, he noted that the world is once again facing a nuclear threat.: The Doomsday Clock shows less than one and a half minutes to midnight.
According to the minister, Western countries have violated previous security agreements and are arming themselves, ignoring the interests of Belarus. In response, the republic has deployed Russian nuclear weapons and is awaiting the arrival of the Oreshnik to ensure protection.
Ryzhenkov stressed that the measures are defensive in nature and comply with international law.
The putler block are starting to realise that pissing off all all your western neighbours that all have had better economies for a few decades, is not a very good idea
FrowingFostek
in reply to return2ozma • • •