Salta al contenuto principale



Russia/Trump demands continue to degrade to 'current frozen lines'.


Lost in the awfulness of this entire pointless genocidal vanity revenge project is just how historically badly it is going for Russia. From an initial goal of total conquest, in a month their truce startping point has slid from 1) Total Capitulation to 2) All 4 'annexed' regions plus Crimea, disarmament & constitutional neutrality to 3) Give us Donbas, and maybe our stooges in the U.N. can run Ukraine to 4) Please freeze the lines and give us something, and stop hitting our gas facilities. Trump, as always, overplayed his hand with leverage he doesn't actually have, and now has nearly no sway over Ukraine - Zelensky is tellin him flat 'No'. European and domestic support is probably enough to keep Russia from any meaningful strategic wins at this point against a severaly degraded and over rated Russian army.

https://www.newsweek.com/russia-ukraine-war-kremlin-putin-trump-10905942

Questa voce è stata modificata (46 minuti fa)

in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Ok dude while yes voting for the lesser evil is not the best option it's still better than just letting the evil evil win. Until there is another candidate that has a real chance of winning that is not a Democrat or a Republican then voting for the lesser evil is our best shot. We may not have another election because Trump is in power or at the bear minimum these next 3 and a bit years are going to fucking suck the first year already has.
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

A more appropriate caption would probably be something to the tune of “we sure showed the lesser evil”

in reply to uszo165

Windows 10 died a few days ago, leaving users with three options: stick with the OS, upgrade to Windows 11, or switch to an entirely different platform like macOS or GNU/Linux. But months before Microsoft dropped support for the OS, Linux-focused companies were already campaigning to poach Microsoft customers and convert them into Linux users.

The Document Foundation, the folks behind LibreOffice, started its push as far back as June this year, criticizing Microsoft's decision to end support, which would render millions of perfectly functional PCs obsolete, and presented Linux as a cost-effective and secure alternative. We have also seen initiatives like The "End of 10" Campaign by KDE, making the case for Linux and providing guides and info on how to switch.

Of all the projects trying to poach Windows users, Zorin Group might be the most aggressive, launching its biggest OS upgrade, Zorin OS 18, on the very day Windows 10 died.

In a recent post on X, Zorin Group celebrated the launch of version 18, claiming that it hit 100,000 downloads in "a little over 2 days". The company called it its "biggest launch ever" and claimed that over 72% of those downloads came from Windows.

Zorin OS 18 just reached 100,000 downloads in a little over 2 days 🎉️

Over 72% of these downloads came from Windows, reflecting our mission to provide a better alternative to the incumbent operating systems from Big Tech.

Thank you for making this our biggest launch ever! pic.twitter.com/6U4h3EQ3dq
— Zorin OS (@ZorinOS) October 16, 2025


So what's the big deal with Zorin OS 18? The new version comes with a redesigned desktop that feels a lot more modern. It uses a lighter color palette and a taskbar that has a floating, rounded style by default. The developers also introduced a much better window tiling system. If you drag a window to the top of the screen, a layout manager pops up, similar to Windows 11's Snap Layouts. The main difference here is that Zorin allows you to create your own custom tiling layouts.

As for Windows app compatibility, Zorin OS 18 now includes an updated version of WINE 10 for better support of Windows software. On top of that, there's also an expanded database that helps when it detects a Windows installer. The system checks the file and suggests the best way to run over 170 popular apps, whether that means installing a native Linux version, using the web-based alternative, or firing it up through WINE.

in reply to Kami

Windows 10 didn’t “die”

Microsoft isn’t offering support for it, but their help was barely useful to begin with.

There’s a few small hoops to jump through to enroll in the Extended Security Updates program, after which Windows 10 devices will continue to be functional and secure for at least another year.

Ultimately, I’m all for folks going out and dabbling in Linux. Unfortunately, most consumers are interpreting this situation as a requirement to rush out and buy a new Windows 11 PC and that’s bad.


in reply to DeathByBigSad

What’s wrong with the endless supply of websites? What does an app give you?






Israeli security minister pushes to resume Gaza war




Hamas acting in good faith – senior US negotiator





in reply to ThirdConsul

I'm posting it for the numbers. Just because I post an article, doesn't mean I agree with the conclusions and opinion expressed by the author.

in reply to Avid Amoeba

I often think about how much energy we waste because our hardware is fast enough to allow for software bloat. The dynamics of capitalism select for making software that's just good enough to use and can be pushed out cheaply and quickly, meanwhile hardware companies benefit from software bloat because it allows them to sell new chips. If the dynamic was different, we would have far more efficient software stacks that would require a lot less power to run. If you scale it up to billions of users globally, it translates to an incredible amount of energy saving. It's another example of how capitalist incentives lead to horrendous inefficiency.
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

You're obviously not wrong on the relationships between these variables. There's however use value in just-good-enough, easy-to-write, bloated software in that it could enable value creation and higher efficiency elsewhere. E.g. a shitty, power-hungry computer vision program that frees up 20 people from doing visual quality inspection of parts in a factory. These people can then do the manual work needed on additional lines, thus increasing the labour efficiency and output of the factory, and lowering the cost of the production per unit. Which frees up resources elsewhere in the economy, increasing the effect. All of which could more than offset the inefficiency of the original program and then some. Of course capitalism won't necessarily select for these use cases for bloat. More likely than not we're producing bloat that doesn't offset anything. But in a non-capitalist environment, such bloat might very well be desired. Especialy if you're trying to develop at speed that allows you to create deterrents before the US decides to liberate you from non-capitalism.
Questa voce è stata modificata (2 minuti fa)


Why does a Local AI Voice Agent Running on a Super-Cheap Soc Matter?




Ethiopia in Talks With China to Convert Dollar Loans Into Yuan


archive.ph/vPpiI
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Funny federated comment:

And so Peter Navarro (remember him?) got hold of the monkey’s paw, and he said, “I wish we didn’t have a trade deficit with China,” and then the finger curled over.