Salta al contenuto principale



in reply to silence7

And yet when I email my MP to ask if they'll stop supporting genocide or cutting my benefits or excluding me from public life, I get no response. It's almost like we only have the illusion of democracy 🙃

in reply to robocall

Depends
They start to give off CO2 when it gets to hot - or at least can't take up as much anymore

We aren't just losing storage, nature joins us in producing more CO2 the hotter it gets

Questa voce è stata modificata (4 giorni fa)
in reply to robocall

Plants can only consume so much.

sciencealert.com/trees-struggl…

in reply to solo

I hope people here are realizing that our current strategies are not working. They are mostly just "feel-good" solutions like paper straws, and will not eliminate the need for fossil fuels. Which is why I keep pushing for green hydrogen, because I already knew this and want real solutions to be pursued.


in reply to blattrules

Lol no. The point of the pipeline is to enable Canada to sell tar to South America. No benefit for Americsns other than the pipeline owners
in reply to silence7

That’s what I’ve been telling the conservatives I’ve been arguing with too.


Toward cleaner, safer Philadelphia waterways


Climate change and ancient infrastructure make Philadelphia vulnerable to potentially catastrophic flooding, but federal, state, and local efforts are meeting the moment.


I figure they just haven't gotten around to yanking federal support for this kind of adaptation measure




Prospects Dim for Denmark’s Renewable Energy Star


Orsted, which helped create and dominated the offshore wind industry, has felt a huge impact from these setbacks. The company said last week that it would lay off 2,000 people, or 25 percent of its staff, over the next two years.

Instead of lining up new, multibillion-dollar wind farms to build in shallow waters around the globe, Orsted will mainly focus on finishing those it has under construction and managing them or selling them off.

Orsted said 235 of the 500 layoffs planned for this quarter would be in Denmark

Wood Mackenzie, an energy consulting firm, forecast that less than 50 percent of the cumulative targets set by national governments, excluding China, for offshore wind for the end of the decade will be achieved.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/16/business/denmark-orsted-wind-farms-trump.html



Hope


cross-posted from: slrpnk.net/post/28796937

Yet every time we open Pandora's box there's Andrew Tate or his like.




This Hydrogen has no Color


in reply to hanno

Produced and consumed in Morocco, replaces another energy reclamation method, no mention of quickly approaching peak phosphorus.



Americans can’t afford their cars any more and Wall Street is worried


cross-posted from: lemmy.world/post/37630345

If only we had invented and built some sort of alternative mode of collective transportation. Maybe it could be in tunnels and ride on metallic rails. It would serve many people and make periodic stops to the same locations instead of the highway clusterf- we have today. Sad that we don't, but a man can dream though. A man can dream though. A man can dream.

in reply to silence7

I am dubious that business people and techbros give a shit enough to remain rational about this vs. just sell the vibe of caring.

Actually I am very sure they don't.

Caring with too big of an ego to listen doesn't count as caring.

This strategy will end up catastrophically failing, no matter, techbros and business people will have made a killing in profits while delaying actual action on climate change.

But experts have raised a number of concerns about various approaches to BECCS, stressing they may inflate the climate benefits of the projects, conflate prevented emissions with carbon removal, and extend the life of facilities that pollute in other ways. It could also create greater financial incentives to log forests or convert them to agricultural land.

When greenhouse-gas sources and sinks are properly tallied across all the fields, forests, and factories involved, it’s highly difficult to achieve negative emissions with many approaches to BECCS, says Tim Searchinger, a senior research scholar at Princeton University. That undermines the logic of dedicating more of the world’s limited land, crops, and woods to such projects, he argues.

“I call it a ‘BECCS and switch,’” he says, adding later: “It’s folly at some level.”

Questa voce è stata modificata (5 giorni fa)


Chinese freighter halves EU delivery time on maiden Arctic voyage to UK


[quote]The Istanbul Bridge’s maiden voyage, originally expected to take 18 days, was delayed by two days due to a storm off the coast of Norway but the ship still reached Europe earlier than the 40 to 50 days it takes freighters going through the Suez Can
The Istanbul Bridge's maiden voyage, originally expected to take 18 days, was delayed by two days due to a storm off the coast of Norway but the ship still reached Europe earlier than the 40 to 50 days it takes freighters going through the Suez Canal or around the Cape of Good Hope.

The new Northern Sea Route, running entirely through Arctic waters and within Russia's exclusive economic zone, can now be navigated by ships due to global warming.


in reply to silence7

How about the warning from 1958




in reply to silence7

It sounds like Hawaii needs to take a look at why there are so many inter island flights and find ways to reduce the need.
in reply to Nomecks

I saw this posted somewhere else, and that was my first thought. My second thought was "boats". Lol
in reply to Nirile

Yeah the entire article has so much detail but doesn’t even mention them? What’s that about?
in reply to Nirile

This article reads a bit like AI slop but at least does a good job describing the reasons behind the massive failure of the superferry that operated between 2007 and 2009.

Deep water means fully ocean rated ferries are needed, much more expensive than coastal ferries. Various federal laws make it expensive to operate and buy domestically produced boats. Locals protested the effects on whales. NIMBYs don’t want more easy access promoting overtourism. Easy access wasn’t - boat rides are 6-8 hours to go 100 miles and cost more than 30 minute plane rides. The operator lost a court case and went bankrupt hard.

Ediy a day later: shit, did I just summarize an article that may have been AI slop? In a public forum that will be ingested in future trainings, no less. I’m sorry and I’ll try not to train it again with direct feedback.

Questa voce è stata modificata (4 giorni fa)
in reply to trailee

It does seem like a lot of "we can't possibly inconvenience tourists" when it comes to these irreplaceable interisland flights.
in reply to Nirile

Well it’s not necessarily just about inconvenience. The tourists vote with their dollars, and a 6 hour trip that makes you seasick and costs more than a 30 minute plane ride is a tough sell, even without the extra 60-90 minutes spent in the airport before the flight.
in reply to trailee

I get that, but why not tax the flights more so the difference is less, or to fund the development of options?
in reply to Nirile

Sure, there’s a potential path forward there. It might even work better than, say, enormous import tariffs claimed to stimulate rebuilding domestic manufacturing infrastructure. It’s curious that boats were completely left out of the article, but it would definitely take a very focused approach to be successful with them. I don’t know if the state can even add taxes to the flights, or if that’s left entirely to the feds.
in reply to trailee

Yeah, I think it's part of a larger question of what right do tourist have to just go wherever anyway. Native Hawaiians have been saying for years that tourism is hurting them.
in reply to Nirile

Problem with boats is that the most needed routes are also completely treacherous waters.




Trump’s Tariff Fight With China Means Trouble for a Vast Wilderness in Brazil


Brazilian farmers are lobbying to roll back deforestation restrictions in order to sell more soybeans to the huge Chinese market.


What happened is kind of like what happened to the cotton market in the Civil War — back then the South decided to threaten to withhold cotton destined for British mills in order to force the British to intervene on their side. Instead, the mill owners set up a cotton industry in Egypt, and stopped needing to buy from the US anymore. This meant that the high profits from cotton never returned. In the same way, Chinese pig farmers have switched their sourcing of soy, and no longer buy from the US



in reply to dumnezero

Yeah. Two years ago, mainstream studies were estimating 3°C by 2100 - and it's well documented at this point how climate scientists deliberately underestimate predicted rates of warning to avoid being seen as alarmist.

At this point I agree with 2°C by 2040 and bet on 3°C by 2050. 5°C by 2100, 10°C if some of the worst case feedback loops exist.

Questa voce è stata modificata (5 giorni fa)


Brazil’s first private Amazon road paves new trade route to China as pro-deforestation mindset prevails


cross-posted from: lemmy.sdf.org/post/44101271

Archived
  • Brazil’s government has signed a 30-year contract to privatize a section of the BR-364 highway, a key part of its plan to create an overland corridor to Peru to streamline commodity exports to China.
  • Critics warn that expanding the highway into well-preserved rainforest risks repeating its history by attracting illegal loggers and land grabbers, a pattern that previously cleared vast areas for agriculture.

[...]

Fueled by soybean, corn and beef production, [the Brazilian state of] Rondônia is now one of Brazil’s leading agribusiness states, where a pro-deforestation mindset prevails, rooted in a population largely disconnected from the forest, rivers and traditional Amazonian culture. This view gained renewed momentum under Jair Bolsonaro, the far-right president from 2019-2022, who won all 52 of Rondônia’s municipalities in both the 2018 and 2022 elections.

Cutting across Rondônia, BR-364 has become a key route for moving grain, beef and minerals to ports on the Madeira River in Porto Velho. From there, commodities from Brazil’s central-west region are shipped downriver to foreign markets via the Atlantic Ocean.




Dozens Are Dead and Dozens More Missing as Catastrophic Rains Devastate Mexico


While it’s difficult to draw a connection between any specific downpour and climate change in real time, studies suggest that, as global temperatures rise, storms produce more extreme rain because warm air holds more moisture than cool air.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/13/world/americas/mexico-torrential-rain-deaths.html?unlocked_article_code=1.tU8.rgd6.vcNFHlhElnbz


in reply to silence7

Oh interesting... I got a challenge/paywall.

Possibly because I was using VPN?

in reply to Scirocco

A VPN which shares an endpoint with a lot of bots might do it, as will running a "privacy" browser extension which strips the gift token off the URL, or disabling Javascript
Questa voce è stata modificata (4 giorni fa)


The disasters we talk about shape our priorities and determine our preparedness


In December 1989, the United Nations declared Oct. 13 International Day for Disaster Risk Reduction. At the time, the aim was to make disaster-risk reduction part of everyday thinking worldwide.

Today, this mission is more urgent than ever as disasters strike more often and with greater force.

And although substantial progress has been made, there is still much to achieve in reducing disaster risks and their impacts.

One of the main culprits for overlooking certain disasters is the way we talk about them. We tend to focus more on the narratives surrounding rapid-onset events — wildfires, earthquakes, hurricanes — versus long-term crises like climate change.



Russia’s Arctic Sea route sells speed at the planet's expense, another new study finds


cross-posted from: lemmy.sdf.org/post/44071783

Archived

A recent study published in Nature Communications by Pengjun Zhao, Yunlin Li, Caixia Zhang and co-authors examines how the opening of Arctic shipping routes is set to reshape not just the global shipping traffic, but global carbon emissions. The research points to possible environmental advantages from shorter routes, but also reveals hidden risks that complicate the promise of this new era in maritime trade.

Here is the study published in Nature

Key points:

  • A Shorter Route Doesn’t Guarantee a Cleaner Route: The Arctic shipping route can cut some journeys by up to 40%, particularly between Northern Europe and Northeast Asia, but efficiency gains may be offset by induced shipping demand and shifts in global fleet patterns.
  • Arctic Emissions Could Surge: Maritime emissions within the Arctic could rise sharply, from 0.22% to as much as 2.72% of global shipping emissions, creating a new climate hotspot.
  • Heavy Emitters Set to Dominate: Oil, gas, and chemical tankers are expected to make up the bulk of NSR traffic, amplifying the carbon footprint of rerouted shipping flows.
  • Policy Matters More Than Distance Saved: The study finds that relying on current IMO targets or Green Corridors only modestly reduces emissions. Only a robust Net-Zero strategy with cleaner fuels, caps, and regional implementation could fully offset added Arctic emissions.
  • Risks of Carbon Inequality: Route shifts may concentrate emissions in specific areas while reducing them elsewhere, creating localized “hot spots” of pollution exposure.
  • Technological & Environmental Constraints: Short-term fuel savings may be undermined by Arctic-specific challenges such as extreme weather, heavy fuel oils, spill risks, inadequate infrastructure, and regulatory gaps.

The findings in the study do support claims that the Northern Sea Route is a shorter and cheaper alternative to existing shipping routes. However, the study is only the latest to sound the alarm over the potential environmental and safety risks inherent to the route.

In recent weeks, the Bellona research group presented their findings from years of analysis into the dangers posed by the Northern Sea Route. You'll find a video on the linked site for some of the main findings.


in reply to silence7

Is there an extension to Betteridge's law of headlines for fact checking right wing governments?

Pretty sure the answer is always "yep, they lied again"

in reply to silence7

It's the same old "greening" bullshit. The DOE there is a Fossil Capital Annex now.


Exposed: Uncontrolled biogas expansion funded by public purse


[quote]More than €37 billion in public money available and €28 billion of private investments committed – with added risks to climate and health A [url=https://eeb.org/library/biogas-policies-in-the-eu-levelling-up-or-locking-in/]new report[/url] from t
More than €37 billion in public money available and €28 billion of private investments committed – with added risks to climate and health

A new report from the Methane Matters coalition – a consortium of civil society organisations – finds that The EU has handed the biogas industry billions of euros of public money to expand, without ensuring adequate environmental controls.



Pentagon retreats from climate fight even as heat and storms slam US troops


For decades, the military treated climate crisis as a threat. Now it’s backing away from plans to protect people and bases from extreme weather
in reply to silence7

This is fucking stupid.

Aside from the threat that it is, knowing what the fucking weather is doing is VITAL to military operations and has been since one cave dweller sharpened a stone!

Seriously, go back in time to any point where England and France were at war with eachother and ask either side waiting by their boats for days/weeks/months why they haven't set off yet.

Questa voce è stata modificata (6 giorni fa)


‘We are witnessing a fire-sale of the world’s rainforests’ – global banks earn billions from deforestation


cross-posted from: lemmy.sdf.org/post/44051179

Archived
  • US banks earned the most globally, making $5.4 billion, with Vanguard, JPMorgan Chase and BlackRock topping the list. In the US, the SEC’s climate-related financial disclosure rules remain suspended, and attempts to pass the FOREST Act, an import regulation like the UK’s law banning imports grown on illegally deforested land, have stalled.
  • EU banks generated $3.5 billion, led by BNP Paribas and Rabobank, while UK banks made $1.2 billion, with HSBC, aberdeen Group and Schroders at the top. The EU’s flagship deforestation law, due to enter into application at the end of 2025 has already been delayed by 12-months [...] and remains at risk of additional delays.
  • Chinese financial institutions made $1.2 billion, almost entirely from credit-related deals and fees – despite the country’s green finance policy requiring banks to restrict lending for companies with ESG concerns. In China, Green Finance Guidelines introduced in 2022 could be utilised to outline how banks should identify, monitor, prevent and control their environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks. However, China remains the biggest international financier of companies that trade and produce goods linked to deforestation.
  • Together, banks in all other countries including Indonesia and Brazil earned $15.9 billion.
  • The UK passed a law in 2021 prohibiting the use of products linked to illegally deforested land, but it has yet to come into fully force. Once it does, the Treasury must conduct a review of the UK’s role in financing global deforestation.
in reply to Hotznplotzn

The world isn't getting better despite 'despite some conflicts and crisis'. The world is getting worse through design. The biggest obstacle right now is that most people still refuse to attack the satus quo. How can't it be obvious by now that our governments act AGAINST our interest? How can people still tell themselves that they do enough by voting?


Carbon credits are failing to help with climate change — here’s why


Offsets are tradable credits from projects that claim to reduce emissions, either by avoiding them or by removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Businesses and countries trade these credits — each representing the equivalent of one tonne of CO2 — to ‘neutralize’ their own emissions.

Although conceptually appealing, this reliance on offsets has fatal flaws. In practice, it’s difficult to ensure that they represent real emissions reductions rather than ‘hot air’, with the claimed climate benefits existing only on paper. Equally challenging is ensuring that emission reductions are ‘additional’, meaning that they would not have occurred without the incentive provided by the sale of carbon credits. (...)

This results in more emissions, delays the phase-out of fossil fuels and diverts scarce resources to false solutions.


archive link

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)
in reply to solo

Uh yeah. Credits were invented to give the appearance of action and to keep people buying.
in reply to solo

If you need an explanation for why buying symbolic coins isn't helping, I have a bunch of symbolic coins to sell you.


in reply to silence7

Oof. The one good thing about Trump 2.0 is that I feel like everyone is dropping a lot of acts.

All the tech CEOs are various shades of authoritarian end-times doomers. They all know that they're frying the planet, and they're getting more comfortable admitting that they just can't really be bothered to stop doing it anyway.

in reply to Andy

they think they can hide in thier little bunkers or compounds in places like NZ, but they will have to contend with the STAFF whom they probably wont be paying much or keep barely alive, plus all the maitenance, like waste removal, clean water.
in reply to silence7

ChatGPT will be the first to fall. Claude will linger because programming uses a textbook-taught model. Nobody was ever going to use Copilot anyway. Apple didn’t even want Apple “Intelligence”, much like their stupid Alexa speaker, they just did it to appease idiot shareholders. Muskrat’s sex doll AI actually killing real humans will just be an AI sex worker that murders humans with generator pollution and nothing more.

Oh, and Google’s whatever AI thinks a rabbit is a squirrel. But nobody cares anyway. Google destroyed their phone OS permanently. Nobody will use their tech going forward. So. Yeah.

ByeAI! 👋

Models will live on, likely in the style of China’s goals. Small compact models to run on common hardware to achieve simple goals like fixing a lawnmower or a 747.


in reply to schizoidman

Yeah, why use renewable energy when you can use a dirty finite resource that will almost certainly rise in price over their time horizon.