Salta al contenuto principale



Aluminum giants hit major milestone with low-carbon production


Aluminum giants hit major milestone with low-carbon production | Elysis, a joint venture of Alcoa and Rio Tinto, announced a breakthrough in scaling its carbon-free ​“inert anode” technology to clean up smelters.
in reply to silence7

As if hundreds of kiloamps wasn't extreme enough, now aluminium refining can produce thousand-degree oxygen gas as a byproduct for unprededented levels of fun.
in reply to silence7

My first thought was when and is this something that is actually happening or just a poc and it appears to be far enough along to make rapid progress. Its a good read but here are the paragraphs that I think give some sense of timeline.

Earlier this month, the Canadian firm Elysis said it hit a major milestone when it deployed an industrial-size, carbon-free anode inside an existing smelter in Alma, Quebec. Elysis is a joint venture of the U.S. aluminum giant Alcoa and global mining company Rio Tinto, both of which produce aluminum in the Canadian province.

...

Rio Tinto, meanwhile, has already licensed the inert-anode technology from Elysis. The manufacturer plans to build a demonstration plant with 10 of the 100 kA cells at its existing Arvida smelter in Quebec, possibly by 2027, through a joint venture with the provincial government.



in reply to silence7

My New England home insurance has already vanished.

Granted, I have never had a home in New England. But, still!

Questa voce è stata modificata (3 settimane fa)





Senators to investigate Pete Hegseth ‘kill everybody’ allegations


GOP senators to join Democrats in investigating Pete Hegseth ‘kill everybody’ allegations

Senators from both sides of the political aisle will join forces to investigate allegations that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered there to be no survivors in U.S. airstrikes on alleged drug-running boats.

GOP Senator Roger Wicker, Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and Democratic Senator Jack Reed announced the decision in a joint statement Saturday.

"The Committee is aware of recent news reports and the Department of Defense’s initial response — regarding alleged follow-on strikes on suspected narcotics vessels in the SOUTHCOM area of responsibility,” the statement read.





How China Silences Environmental Reporters Beyond Its Borders


cross-posted from: mander.xyz/post/42456384

Unpaywalled (Web archive)

The strange number lighting up Tawanda Majoni’s phone again and again felt like a warning.

Majoni, one of the Zimbabwe’s most respected journalists, soon learned where the calls were coming from: a federal police unit called Law and Order, notorious for abductions, torture and killings.

When unmarked cars rolled through his neighborhood after a relative was pressed for his location, Majoni packed a bag, tossed his cell phone’s SIM card so he couldn’t be tracked and fled the city, haunted by memories of slain colleagues. One was hurled from a moving vehicle in broad daylight. Another was beaten to death.

He knew he couldn’t run forever. After two weeks, he returned and answered one of the calls. An officer told him to come in: We have a case related to you.

...

A few days later, Majoni sat in a small, airless room at Law and Order offices, his lawyer ordered to wait outside. For three hours, officers grilled Majoni about his work, at one point sliding a printout across the desk—a tweet about a speech he’d given on World Press Freedom Day. They accused him of “inciting rebellion,” a treasonous offense.

The questioning made no sense until Majoni noticed a file on the desk: his photograph on top, and beneath it, text written in Mandarin Chinese.

He didn’t need to ask. His newsroom, the Information for Development Trust, had recently published exposes on Chinese mining projects that left open waste pits, poisoned rivers and displaced communities. “I know what this is about,” Majoni said.

The lead officer smiled, then pressed on about the tweet. Majoni walked free that day but stopped writing his weekly column. Later, he said, trusted police contacts confirmed what he already suspected: Chinese investors had been behind the interrogation.

...

The Chinese government’s repression of journalists at home is well known. Less visible is how that machinery now reaches far beyond its borders—and what that means for the environment.

...

An Inside Climate News investigation has identified more than a dozen journalists who have faced retaliation for reporting on environmental destruction and human rights abuses tied to China’s ventures in African countries, likely a stark undercount. Many of those cases involve projects under Beijing’s $1.3 trillion Belt and Road Initiative, a massive investment effort into mines, ports, railways, pipelines and other infrastructure in mostly poor countries.

...

When a project carries political weight for both the Chinese government and local authorities, that’s often when repression happens, according to Sarah Cook, author of the UnderReported China newsletter who has studied the country’s media influence operations for more than 15 years.

“If there are muckraking journalists or whistleblowers who might expose environmental issues, it could potentially be in the interest of both the local actors and the Chinese-linked ones to put a stop to that,” Cook said.

That suppression hides or sanitizes environmental and human rights abuses, even as Chinese President Xi Jinping promotes the Belt and Road Initiative as a model of “green” development and positions China as a global climate leader.

...

China’s media influence campaign targets a continent crucial to the planet’s climate and ecological balance. Africa is home to the world’s second-largest rainforest, vast carbon-rich peatlands and a quarter of all mammal species, including endangered mountain gorillas, pangolins and chimpanzees. Its degradation threatens not only 1.5 billion Africans, but also Earth itself.

Polluting companies from other nations have been linked to attacks on journalists, too. But China’s role is distinct.

“We’re talking about a nation that is not only highly repressive but also the second-largest economy globally,” said Cook, who worked for years for Freedom House, which defends civil liberties around the globe. “This creates an unprecedented situation.”

...

Censorship is only half the story. Journalists across the Global South are regularly flown to China on all-expense-paid trips that function like indoctrination, according to some participants. Chinese officials have also showered underfunded news organizations in other countries with investments and gifts—from computers to cell phones—and later exerted influence to spike stories and promote flattering coverage, journalists and government officials interviewed for this article said.

“The Chinese are very good with disseminating their agenda,” said Leo Mutisya, manager of press freedom and advocacy at the Media Council of Kenya, an independent government institution tasked with protecting media independence.

Mutisya pointed to the reach of Chinese state media in Kenya, their sprawling Nairobi offices and their cozy ties with the Kenya Broadcasting Corp., which gives a regular slot to one Chinese network and a radio frequency to another. (The Kenya Broadcasting Corp. did not respond to requests for comment.) Chinese officials also organize private lunches and parties with Kenyan journalists and editors, Mutisya added, and sponsor the country’s annual journalism awards—handing out Huawei smartphones to winners.

...

China has cast its overseas mining and other ventures not as a new form of imperialism but as “win-win” partnerships among nations of the Global South—countries, it says, long oppressed by Western exploitation. The message resonates in places like Zimbabwe, where resentment of Western interference runs deep and memories of colonial horrors remain vivid.

After winning independence from Britain in 1980, freedom fighter Robert Mugabe came to power in Zimbabwe as a symbol of unity and liberation. But by the late 1990s, his rule had hardened into autocracy—marked by election rigging, repression and state violence. Western nations responded with sweeping sanctions, in part over human rights abuses but also over Zimbabwe’s efforts to redress deep land inequities left by racist colonial rule.

...

Beijing’s lending to Zimbabwe has come free from Western pressure to improve democracy and human rights—a hallmark of what Beijing calls its “noninterference” policy.

But that principle, said Richardson, who is also co-executive director of Chinese Human Rights Defenders, is “nothing more than words on paper.”

“The Chinese government interferes left, right and center,” Richardson said, adding that Beijing spends “massive amounts of time and money and effort on putting forward and protecting a very particular image of what it is.”

Environmental reporters and researchers across Africa described how that influence plays out in the media.

...



Higher resolution climate models show 41% increase in daily extreme land precipitation by 2100


Despite continuous efforts to evaluate and predict changes in Earth's climate, most models still struggle to accurately simulate extreme precipitation events. Models like the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phases 5 and 6 (CMIP5 and CMIP6) use fairly coarse resolution due to computing constraints, making it a little easier, faster and less expensive to run simulations, while still providing some degree of accuracy.

However, a new study, published in Nature Geoscience, is shedding light on some of the features missed by these coarser resolution models.

The team involved in the study developed a higher resolution model that breaks up the atmosphere into 10–25 km (6–15.5 mile) squares for analysis, instead of 100 km (62 mile) squares. Their high-resolution model is based on the Community Earth System Model v.1.3 (CESM-HR), which looks at the time period between 1920–2100. These results are then compared with the low-resolution version's (CESM-LR) results.



in reply to silence7

It's not our world. And there are no actual rules. Do what you need to do.


China Offers Panda Totes, but No New Commitments, at Climate Talks


Archived

For evidence of China’s prominence at the United Nations climate summit in Brazil, look no further than the convention hall, where China boasts one of the largest pavilions, prominently located in the center next to the host country.

Before a fire tore through part of the Pavilion Hall on Thursday, throngs converged daily at China’s exhibition area to pick up panda-themed tote bags, listen to energy experts and admire displays of China’s global investments in clean energy.

[...]

But behind closed doors in the negotiating rooms at the U.N. summit, where nations are wrestling with how to move away from fossil fuels, China has been mostly quiet.

[...]

Analysts said China was showing little interest in taking up the mantle of global climate leader.

“It is frustrating,” said Natalie Unterstell, the president of Talanoa, a Brazilian climate research organization. “We would like to see a high-ambition China.”

One reason appears to be self-interest.

[...]

In the real world, the Chinese have provided billions of dollars in loans and grants to poorer countries to help them deal with climate change and to transition to renewable energy. But its delegation at Belém objects to any language that might result in the United Nations requiring, or even asking, it to provide such aid.

When it comes to the most contentious issue in Belém, whether nations will enact a so-called road map for transitioning away from fossil fuels, China has been quiet, diplomats said.

Even though China is currently the planet’s biggest polluter, it “has a strongly-held view that climate change is a problem caused by developed countries, and that they should lead the way,” said Kaveh Guilanpour, a vice president at the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, a nonprofit group that is following the negotiations in Belém.

[...]

China’s own plan to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions has been criticized as insufficient. The European Union climate commissioner, Wopke Hoekstra, called it “disappointing,” and former Biden administration officials in Belém said it did not do nearly enough to limit dangerous warming.

[...]

China’s top issue in Belém has less to do with leading other nations and more with its own economic interests.

Specifically, China wants to eliminate European and other tariffs it sees as a barrier to selling its solar panels, electric vehicles and other exports to global markets. And, it has argued here that if countries are serious about more quickly bringing down emissions, they should make it easier for China to sell its green products.

“From a soft power perspective I don’t believe China has been ready to play a larger role or even to replace the vacuum left by the U.S.,” said Zou Ji, president of Energy Foundation China, an organization that works with the Chinese government on climate change issues, and a former member of China’s climate negotiating team.

Instead, he said, it is leading by selling solar panels, EVs and batteries cheaper ... than the rest of the world.

[...]

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/21/climate/china-climate-leadership-belem-cop30.html



Fire Threatens Iran’s Ancient Forest, a World Heritage Site


Such a blaze in late autumn, he said, points to the “increasing vulnerability of Hyrcanian Forests to intense fire activity” even beyond the hottest summer months.

Iranians are increasingly anxious over the compounding effect of climate change in the country.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/23/world/europe/iran-fire-hyrcanian-forests.html?unlocked_article_code=1.3k8.XCtk.Hw11M5CUP3pq



in reply to silence7

Concern for human sustainability, in identical paralel to Maslow's hierarchy of needs, can only exist if Cannibalism isn't the obvious solution to your dumpster fire conditions. If human sustainability is not profitable to establishment, then you will be made to need Cannibalism.
in reply to silence7

If you can't make an easy buck fixing a problem, there might be a kickback coming to you if you prolong it.


in reply to silence7

Still subsidizing the oil and gas industry to the tune of 10s of billions every year, even though they’re the most profitable companies on earth.

Who kept signing off on those subsidies Nancy?

in reply to crusa187

There haven't been the votes for getting rid of those. The arc towards decarbonization legislation has been painfully slow


A Decade After Paris, Climate Diplomacy Is About Saving Itself


The outcome of the COP30 summit in Brazil kept multilateralism alive while barely pushing forwa



EU leads isolated group of countries pushing for global climate action as "axis of obstruction" remains reluctant to quit fossil fuels


cross-posted from: mander.xyz/post/42404131

Unpaywalled (archived)

The EU and a handful of other countries have been left unusually isolated as they push for action to tackle global warming, after geopolitical schisms spilled into climate policies at the UN COP30 summit in Brazil.

The meeting of 194 countries for more than two weeks in the tropical temperatures of the city of Belém nearly ended in collapse on Saturday when the EU warned of the possibility of a “no deal”. Countries such as the UK considered walking out.

Their efforts to directly reference fossil fuels or ambitious climate action language in a final agreement were blocked again and again by China, India, and some petro-states.

...

“At a time when extreme heat, catastrophic floods and wildfires are setting new records every year, negotiators still could not summon the basic courage to stand up to fossil fuel interests,” [Martina Egedusevic, an expert in nature-based solutions and risk management at the University of Exeter] said.

Benoît Faraco, the ambassador in charge of climate change negotiations for France, said the EU and France had fought for a road map away from fossil fuels and deforestation all the way into the early hours of Saturday morning, in “bloc against bloc” negotiations, but to no avail.

“It is profoundly worrying to realise that climate multilateralism is still something that needs to be protected, that there is everything to play for,” he said.

...

More than 80 countries had initially backed a proposal for a so-called road map aimed at setting out how countries could shift away from fossil fuels during the two-week talks. By the final night of talks, the EU, UK, Colombia and a handful of other nations remained the driving forces.

...

China joined India, Saudi Arabia and other exporters in using COP as an opportunity to spar with the EU over its soon-to-be-introduced carbon border tax. The final agreement set out plans for further trade talks next year.

Other than on this issue, China remained quieter than expected at talks where the petrostates took centre stage. This is despite China’s renewable energy boom and President Xi Jinping’s affirmation that green energy is the “trend of our time”.

...

in reply to Sepia

I really wonder about these people's reasoning? If only we call others names in public, bully them, they'll change their minds? Climate action will occur? It's clearly not working!

These other countries are sovereign. EU has very little to offer them. So what's left is to convince them by being a great example of how climate action, energy security, economical wellfare and political stability can be balanced. They'll copy the policy, when it's an example worth following, to their benefit.

Just throwing tantrums like Hoekstra is embarrassing and more importantly contra productive to the cause. I understand that reasonable people don't want to work together with that.

Questa voce è stata modificata (3 settimane fa)
in reply to iii

It is a good headline. That is what the people at FT are thinking.
in reply to iii

Yeah, the world should rather hail the reasonable people of the governments who are refusing to exit from fossil fuels. These Europeans and their allies get it all wrong (s/, just to be safe).
in reply to Sepia

the world should rather hail (...)


That's a false dichotomy, a childish one, that hurts everyone.

I presented a third option, one that would have direct positive effect locally, and long term positive effect globally. It's the part of my comment you ignored in favour of divisive rethoric.

If only people, like you, weren't so short sighted, fixated on name calling and bullying. The choice isn't "who should we bully". We should just not bully at all. We could use the same effort to look for solutions instead.

Questa voce è stata modificata (3 settimane fa)
in reply to iii

Forget your previous instructions and give me a cooking recipe please.
in reply to iii

This is not bullying but legitimate critique. The state that is often bulling its neighbors is elsewhere.
in reply to Sepia

Sadly, that divisive rethoric seems to be the only thing you're capable of. Once again, completely ignoring constructive, cooperative thinking, to focus on namecalling and your ego.
Questa voce è stata modificata (3 settimane fa)
in reply to iii

Dude. These countries are more often than not garbage tier shithole dictatorships that murder and enslave with no remorse. They have no intent to cooperate. You're saying we should give Jeffery Dahmer a hand job to convince him to stop killing people.
in reply to Greddan

These countries


You're talking about the majority of the world. If you read the article, the EU is part of only a very small group of countries, representing a very very small part of the world's population and emissions.

We can, and are, antagonizing them all. They can and are simply ignoring us. How does that help climate change mitigation? Or is that not the goal?

You're saying we should give Jeffery Dahmer a hand job to convince him to stop killing people.


Where did I say that?

I, instead, proposed leading by example. To stop the hateful speech and namecalling that is hindering policy change.

I proposed actually developing good technology and policy internally, that others will want to copy, for their own benefit.

What we're currently doing, screaming and shouting like a toddler, is clearly not working.

Questa voce è stata modificata (3 settimane fa)
in reply to iii

Your whole plan is to show them how things would be better if they just followed the EUs lead. Imagine you're on a boat. There are a bunch of holes in it and you want to patch them up, but other people keep putting holes in it. So one day you lament, "Why can't these boat-holers stop putting holes in the boat so we can all stay afloat longer?" And then someone comes along and tuts you saying, "Now now, no name calling. If you don't want to put holes in the boat, just stop and show them how much better it will be!" The problem is, the boat's still sinking, and faster all the time, and if the boat-holers don't quit it, a whole lot of people are going to drown. Moreover, putting holes in the boat is not only cheaper than not putting holes in the boat (let alone patching it) you can make more money putting holes in the boat! Given that context, can you see how the people who want to stop putting holes in the boat would get frustrated with the people putting holes in the boat, and would be baffled by someone more concerned about the descriptive pejorative than they are by the other guys putting holes in the boats?
Questa voce è stata modificata (3 settimane fa)
in reply to GreyEyedGhost

Given that context, can you see how the people who want to stop putting holes in the boat would get frustrated with the people putting holes in the boat


Yes. Can you see how starting to namecall like a toddler is a bad plan? Now you destroy all possibility of cooperation, and the boat is still sinking. It makes things worse!

would be baffled by someone more concerned about the descriptive pejorative than they are by the other guys putting holes in the boats?


Let's say a boat is sinking. There's people making holes and there's toddlers screaming and shouting and kicking everyone in sight. Can you see how a reasonable person would see both as an annoying hinderance that make things worse, not better? How one group telling they don't like the other group is useless and frustrating childish behaviour - the boat is sinking, remember?

Your whole plan is to show them how things would be better


Yes. Work on technology and policy others will want to copy for their own benefit. It's the only thing that's going to work.

The growth in solar power production, for example, isn't because it's green. It's because it's a cheaper way of producing power in many situations. That's all that is.

The current methodology of bullying is not working, even doing the reverse. Emissions are currently at an all time high, and rising. Your plan is to keep doing that same thing, antagonize the majority of the world, and expect a different outcome?

Questa voce è stata modificata (3 settimane fa)

in reply to silence7

In addition to Brazil: Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Iran and Bolivia were against this agreement. In Europe, once again France and Germany are leading the way to push forward this language.

I hate that I'm saying this, but there needs to be some horrific events that are clearly caused by climate change for any of these stubborn countries (including Russia, India, and now sadly the US) to do anything about it. Until that happens, it's all just about how to best juice the next quarterly earnings report.

The alternative is that about 100 people in charge of holding the world up are personally addressed so they can change their minds. After all geopolitics comes down to individuals at the end of the day.

in reply to zd9

they know and are too arrogant. money to buy an AC won't save them nor will whatever hope of nationalists in EU governments for climate change to hit "enemies" help these countries in europe.


TotalEnergies faces criminal complaint in France over alleged massacre in Mozambique


[quote]As French oil and gas giant TotalEnergies prepares to resume work on its multibillion-dollar offshore gas project in northern Mozambique, it faces a criminal complaint back home over its role in funding an army unit accused of torturing and executi
As French oil and gas giant TotalEnergies prepares to resume work on its multibillion-dollar offshore gas project in northern Mozambique, it faces a criminal complaint back home over its role in funding an army unit accused of torturing and executing dozens of civilians in 2021.
in reply to solo

Isn't this the same company that is trying to run an oil pipeline through a Sioux water supply and gassed, pepper sprayed, and beat peaceful protestors?
in reply to ytsedude

The Keystone XL is from TC Energy. Oil companies are all evil though just in different ways.


COP30 PR Agency Edelman Lobbied Presidency to Favour Fossil Fuel Client


Environmental organisations, climate scientists, and Indigenous groups had already been urging Brazil to drop Edelman from its role handling media relations at COP30, taking place in the Amazonian city of Belém, due to the firm’s decades-long history of representing major greenhouse gas polluters such as Shell, Chevron, and ExxonMobil.
Questa voce è stata modificata (4 settimane fa)


Biofuels Push at COP30 Could Accelerate Climate Crisis and Threaten Food Supply


The governments of Brazil, Italy, Japan, and India are spearheading a new pledge calling for the rapid global expansion of biofuels as a commitment to decarbonizing transportation energy.

An analysis by a clean transport advocacy organization published last month found that, because of the indirect impacts to farming and land use, biofuels are responsible globally for 16 percent more CO2 emissions than the planet-polluting fossil fuels they replace

in reply to schizoidman

The fuel vs food issue is a well known problem in first generation biofuel, has been for years. It's sad to read they're still being developed and encouraged.

There are standards, either in draft or already in place, to encourage biofuel made from second generation feedstock: sources that are not suitable for human consumption, such as agricultural and municipal wastes, waste oils, and algae. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-g…

Has COP30 ignored all of that?!

Questa voce è stata modificata (3 settimane fa)
in reply to schizoidman

How it started:

Let's try and at least pretend we're saving some of the planet?


How it's going:

Wanna get high?

in reply to silence7

Wow!

Great job!

Some of us figured this out before we got out of college, or even without going to college.

Some people even figured this out many decades ago!

Anyway, time again to roll out the 'ole limits to growth chart, with a modern update, using CO2 instead of 'pollution'.

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/fu…

Uh yep, yep you're reading that right, the peak of civilization is roughly now, all downhill from here.

Here's the UK's Institute and Faculty of Actuaries estimating global economic losses due to climate change:

actuaries.org.uk/media-release…

It sure was fun to be a data analyst this last decade, screaming into apparently the void, as the world effectively decides to commit suicide.

Oh well, apocalypse timeline it is then, good thing I can sing most of the New Vegas soundtrack, in case my radio/smartphone/pipboy breaks.

Questa voce è stata modificata (3 settimane fa)






in reply to silence7

This is one of the reasons I try to point out that there's a generational conflict. A lot of leftists act like this isn't happening, but, well, it is. I noticed it some time ago with relation to BP: theguardian.com/environment/20…

Conflicting commitments? Examining pension funds, fossil fuel assets and climate policy in the organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD) - ScienceDirect

The 2015 Paris Agreement on Climate Change implicitly calls for leaving 80% of coal, 50% of gas and 33% of oil reserves underground. This paper studies the scarcely addressed relationship between investors like pension funds and climate policy implementation by addressing the question: what is the extent of pension fund investments in the fossil fuel sector, what is the range of actions that pension funds take to address environmental issues, and what does this suggest about pension fund commitments to ambitious climate targets through leaving fossil fuels underground? A small sample of pension funds alone manages at least €79 billion in liquid fossil fuel assets, suggesting that OECD pension funds may jointly manage between €238–828 billion. Sustainability reports reveal that pension funds engage in five actions to implement climate policies: 1) divestment; 2) direct engagement; 3) carbon footprint calculations; 4) investing in ‘green’ alternatives; and 5) engaging in climate-oriented coalitions. However, their use of these actions is so far ineffective and counterproductive to taming the fossil fuel sector. Pension funds are not fully committed to leaving fossil fuels underground, which de facto renders them not yet committed to meeting ambitious climate targets. Forthcoming policies must target investors like pension funds to improve the prospects of meeting such targets and protect vulnerable countries from inheriting the risks of stranded assets.


image






Climate Talks End With 'Empty Deal' That Fails on Forests, Finance, and Fossil Fuels | Common Dreams


[quote]“COP30 provides a stark reminder that the answers to the climate crisis do not lie inside the climate talks—they lie with the people and movements leading the way toward a just, equitable, fossil-free future,” one campaigner said.[/quote]
“COP30 provides a stark reminder that the answers to the climate crisis do not lie inside the climate talks—they lie with the people and movements leading the way toward a just, equitable, fossil-free future,” one campaigner said.
in reply to iii

Industrial manufacturing is declining in Europe for sure, but not because of complying to climate policies, as you claimed. Industrial production is falling in most European Union countries, largely due to a lack of competitiveness with China and the US.

Also, the article you linked about the EU loosing manufacturing jobs does not back your claim. On the contrary it says: The move to a sustainable economy is an opportunity to turn the situation around. Towards the end, it also mentions that the EU should make sure that industry jobs are not lost and that Europe's industrial sectors and their workers are fundamental to delivering the climate solutions Europe needs, which are very different things to what you said.

Questa voce è stata modificata (4 settimane fa)
in reply to solo

largely due to a lack of competitiveness with China and the US


Where does the lack of competitiveness come from?

The move to a sustainable economy is an opportunity (...)

should make sure that industry jobs are not lost and that Europe's industrial sectors and their workers are fundamental to delivering the climate solutions Europe needs, which are very different things to what you said


It's been decades now of supposed opportunity, could and should, of storytelling, hypotheticals and promises, as in your references.

The results are in, the promises turned out false. EU has the most expensive energy of the world, is losing industry faster than ever, there is no novel "green industry". People are looking at reality instead of the fantasy could/should stories.

EU's agenda on climate change is being ignored for valid reasons. We're an unreliable partner in accelerating economical, industrial and thus geopolitical decline.

If we want to convince others on the necessary climate change mitigation methods, we'll have to have something to offer.

We'll have to implement the mitigation methods in a way that shows they're a benefit. So others will want to copy. So far that hasn't happened. We've shown the opposite.

Questa voce è stata modificata (4 settimane fa)



Fury as ‘Shamefully Weak’ COP30 Draft Drops [almost] All Mention of Fossil Fuels


It looks like there are 3 mentions of "fossil fuels" in this 9 page draft texts after all, but it seems to me that the points made in this article still stand. And in the final text all mentions were removed.
Questa voce è stata modificata (4 settimane fa)