Salta al contenuto principale



Who is Sam Mraiche? Inside Alberta’s health care controversy


[url=https://archive.is/i5cR3]https://archive.is/i5cR3[/url] The Globe and Mail’s Tom Cardoso, Carrie Tait, Mark Mackinnon, and Stephanie Chambers have the deep dive on Sam Mraiche. I’ll include some highlights, but this deserves a good read because it p

archive.is/i5cR3

The Globe and Mail's Tom Cardoso, Carrie Tait, Mark Mackinnon, and Stephanie Chambers have the deep dive on Sam Mraiche. I'll include some highlights, but this deserves a good read because it provides an overview with additional information about some of the relationships between Sam Mraiche, Danielle Smith, Jitendra Prasad, and Mickey Amery.

Her former chief of staff, Marshall Smith, hired multiple relatives of Mr. Mraiche at the same time as he was living in a home owned by one of Mr. Mraiche’s sisters.


...

“All of my family is in Canada now,” said Jamil Omairi, a pharmacist in the nearby town of Lala, another springboard for people destined for Alberta. Mr. Omairi is related to Mickey Amery, Alberta’s justice minister, himself a long-time friend and relative of Mr. Mraiche.

“All the young people here, people between 16 and 20, they have two ways to go,” he said. “If they find work, they stay. If there’s no work, they travel, and Brazil and Canada are the first destinations.”


...

Mraiche may be a capable import/exporter, but his world view could be mercenary. An exchange between Mraiche and BTNX, a supplier of COVID rapid tests, highlights this view.

The following week, Mr. Mraiche proposed a solution: He did “a lot of business” in Turkey, he explained, and suggested the BTNX executive use those contacts to obtain additional tests.

Mr. Mraiche also returned to the idea of diverting tests, this time from the federal government. “They’re really going to notice that a million is missing?” he asked.

“They will, yes,” responded Mr. Sunderani.

As deliveries fell further and further behind, Mr. Mraiche, who told Mr. Sunderani he was under intense pressure from Mr. Prasad, became increasingly frustrated.

“Do you know what you’re doing to me, Iqbal?” Mr. Mraiche said in an early February call. “I don’t only sell rapid test kits. I’m one of the biggest constructors here, too. Do you know what you’ve done to me? I’ve had so much mud thrown on my face, it’s not even funny.”

“You better hope there’s another wave that needs rapid tests,” he continued later in the call.

“Sam, that’s – that’s a bad thing to hope for,” Mr. Sunderani said.

“Is it? Me and you are in the business.”

“Sam, you know what? At the end of the day I don’t know about you, but I’ve made enough money. I don’t want to wish –”

“Has Jeff Bezos made enough money yet?”

“I don’t care who Jeff Bezos is,” Mr. Sunderani replied. “He has – I mean, I don’t want to wish –”

“No one’s wishing anything. It’s just going with the flow,” Mr. Mraiche said.

A month after that call, BTNX sued MHCare for $7.5-million, alleging Mr. Mraiche’s business failed to pay for more than 200,000 test kits and refused to pay for a truckload it received in error. MHCare countersued for $62.5-million, alleging BTNX overcharged, caused the company to lose money and tarnished its reputation. The two companies remain locked in litigation, and neither party’s allegations have been proven in court.


...

By the spring of 2022, the government’s response to the pandemic left Premier Jason Kenney battered. A scant majority of United Conservative Party members supported him in a leadership review in May, 2022, and he agreed to step down after the party selected a replacement.

Danielle Smith, then a party leadership hopeful, campaigned on COVID-19 grievances, railing against mask mandates and vaccine passports. Within a few months, she’d established herself as a front-runner.

A copy of Ms. Smith’s private calendar obtained by The Globe shows she took meetings during the campaign with everyone from physicians to executives – including Sam Mraiche.

In August, 2022, she was scheduled to dine at his north Edmonton home, the calendar shows.

Five days later, she was booked for a 30-minute Zoom call with Mr. Mraiche and Mr. Prasad, who retired from Alberta Health Services in the spring but stayed on as a consultant.

Ms. Smith, Mr. Prasad and Mr. Mraiche did not respond to questions about the meetings.


in reply to Zerush

Why even care what the ai had to say? It’s not conscious.

The user is looking to deflect blame for giving a very fallible outside agent the ability to delete important information.

That’s on you my guy.



[Answered] Video players that look like IINA, or can?


Edit: I'm now enlightened and use mpv, I really like the ModernZ OSC (on-screen controls), and uses config files.

IINA is only on macOS. I looked up linux alternatives but none of them seem to have similar looking UIs, at least out of the box. I want the player UI to float on top of the video + with a blurred background, it as shown in the image; or at least the ability to theme it like so.

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 giorni fa)
in reply to TheTwelveYearOld

It’s not blurred, but the UI for Showtime (GNOME Video Player) looks pretty similar with the edge to edge video playback and transparent controls overlay: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/showtim…
in reply to echo

this is what i came here to suggest. it comes default with gnome now on most distros and looks pretty awesome. IIRC it's based on mpv, so you won't have issues playing back media.
Questa voce è stata modificata (2 giorni fa)
in reply to ☂️-

I somehow keep running across videos that won't load in Clapper, Showtime, mpv, VLC, or Handbrake, and Nautilus won't show thumbnails for them. It's very frustrating. Supposedly I've already installed all the available codecs from RPMFusion, but still get the "codec missing" error on a bunch of videos.

Jellyfin on the other hand, it plays everything I've ever thrown at it. I don't know what the hell it's doing differently from the other video players on my system, but it works great.

in reply to Luke

did you get the proprietary codecs installed? i never heard of VLC failing to play anything that isn't actually corrupted, this one is a first.
in reply to ☂️-

Thanks, yeah I think so. At least, I've followed all the steps outlined here rpmfusion.org/Howto/Multimedia but VLC and gstreamer apps continue to tell me that I'm missing codecs. I am stumped, but happy that at least Jellyfin plays everything.
in reply to ☂️-

I think it actually uses GStreamer as a backend which is a bit unfortunate because HDR support is either nonexistent or hit or miss with GStreamer at the moment. I’ve also had worse performance with GST over MPV, but most videos and codecs are fine. It certainly integrates better with the GNOME environment which may have been a driving factor in the decision to use it over MPV.
in reply to TheTwelveYearOld

I think the only ones that do that are Showtime (which was already mentioned) and Clapper which looks even better IMO. I still have VLC installed because it has just so many other features but Clapper is really good if you don't need to do anything weird with the video or subtitles to work. I really feel you on the GUI.


Israel's Love for Capitalism


cross-posted from: lemmy.ml/post/40011764

in reply to Uri

I guess you've already done updates on your packages in termux?

Updating:
pkg upgrade
ani-cli -U

I see that ani-cli prefer to use yt-dlp to ffmpeg if it's available so you could try installing that too.

Questa voce è stata modificata (3 giorni fa)


Too many laws passing without 'proper scrutiny', Geoffrey Palmer says


A former Labour Prime Minister says Parliament is passing too many laws without proper scrutiny.

Sir Geoffrey Palmer told Nine to Noon the government was increasingly pushing through legislation under urgency, which allowed it to skip stages such as public consultation and select committees.

But Leader of the House Chris Bishop said just nine Bills have been passed in that way, and there were good reasons for all of them.

Palmer said the normal checks and balances were stripped out when laws were made at pace.

"Urgency has become the default mechanism for dealing with Parliamentary legislation and the standing orders are not followed and you also have extended sittings - and both of those mean the Government's agenda is completely at the will of the Government," he said.

Palmer said the Fast-Track Approvals Act 2024 - and its amendment - was a classic example of a trend that "ministers know best" and was "ministerial dictatorship".

"It was criticised by the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment then, Simon Upton, the amendment bill puts the process that was enacted in 2024 on steroids.

"It gets faster and faster. It will be a fast-track to environmental degradation, [more] than it already is."

Bishop was approached for further comment.

The legislation, which passed under urgency at the end of last year, is back before Parliament with an amendment that the government intended to push through by the end of 2025.

It said the amendment to the Act would increase competition in the supermarket sector.

Despite being open for just over 10 days, it received 2158 submissions, with about 95 percent opposed.

Palmer said legislative checks and balances - which he already considered lacking - were further reduced when legislation was made at pace.

"What is the hurry? Legislation is law-making. You want to get it right. You have to analyse it, you have to do proper research, you don't bang it through because a minister has an idea.

"It needs to be properly drafted by Parliamentary council. We have had a degradation of our legislative system in New Zealand in recent years."

Bishop said the government had a big legislative agenda and limited hours in ordinary house time to get it done.

Regarding the use of urgency, he said: "I am reluctant to use urgency to avoid select committees outside of the standard Budget urgency process, and it is only done so when there are good reasons."




Ripping Blu Rays is way deeper than I expected


I didn't think I'd spend hours reading about this today, but some things surprised me:

  1. Just using a Playstation sounds like it won't work or will be a huge time sink.
  2. Blu ray optical drives are way more expensive than I thought
  3. The copy protections on Blu rays are exceptionally annoying, to the extent where there is really only one closed source software -- MakeMKV -- that can work around them.
    This post goes into some interesting details.
  4. Finding a drive that is known to work with MakeMKV is a pain. There's a brand called Pioneer that seems promising but they have stopped producing bluray drives ~~went out of business last year~~. I have no idea which model works, and it's common that secondhand sellers will swap enclosures and pass it off as a different model.
  5. Sometimes you need to flash the firmware on the drive to make it work with 4K UHD discs.

I was going to try ripping a Blu-ray that I bought recently, since I couldn't find a quality rip anywhere, but I'm pretty turned off from the whole prospect at this point.

Anyway I'm not really asking for a specific reply, I just thought this topic was interesting and I'm curious what people think about Blu rays and optical media in general. Does the future seem bleak? Are we going to be stuck with shitty WebDLs for most new content? Or is physical media here to stay?

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 giorni fa)
in reply to tatterdemalion

I ripped a ton of my stuff back in the day, guess I've been lucky, every generic BD drive i've used just worked.

But once you get past the "works" hurdle, the real struggle begins.

It's slow, like really slow. Assuming you can find the right titles and convince makemkv extract them, it's a start the process and go brew a cup of coffee slow. But hey, I've got time and you don't need to watch it ... mostly.

Depending on the disk, it's still either crap quality or it takes up an ungodly amount of space. Even a decent sized drive buckles sooner or later if you're generating 20GB images.

Unless you're up on your network game, your streaming sticks/tv's can hardly handle the throughput to stream the video.

So you encode the video. HEVC (which is getting dicey starting january as the royalties go up and processors stop support hardware decoding) or hopefully AV1, which still has spotty support in places. and the re-encode? The easy software isn't free, the free software isn't easy, but FFMPEG isn't that hard to work with.

OR, you find an ISO provider and download it.

in reply to tatterdemalion

I guess I lucked out when I bought my BD-R drive before I was aware that MakeMKV needed extra stuff like firmware. But my LG WH16NS60 is one that took the flash (never had to mess with firmware on an optical drive and was worried I would brick it). But the process was pretty easy and getting into ripping BR after so long meant that the easy option was around to handle the steps. Kind of considering getting a back-up drive to have around if/when the one I have dies (especially since big brands are dropping out or may do so in the coming years).

While not as easy as just using torrents or other P2P. I have found it kind of fun to get back into ripping CD/DVD/BD and learn/re-learn how things work these days. Also nice to have all the options I can to be able to have access to media in the event any of them are down. The only super frustrating thing is that so much of modern releases don't get physical (or even purchasable digital) releases. And in some cases where a physical release is an option, they are DVD and not even a 720p BD. Digital options are even worse in a lot of random cases where a store might have just part of a show (or even episodes in a season not part of it).

Currently the only real issue that I have is that I really really need to build a new main PC and finally turn my current PC into only being for ripping and hosting what I have. And to get large HDDs to replace the 2TB and 4TB SSDs I currently have for it all of course. I really would like to have good copies of 4K stuff without having to worry about going with bad encodes that look worse than many 1080p releases that my TV upscales.




GE-Proton10-26 Released


Github workflows:

  • fixup automatic building and attachment of GE-Proton release tarballs.

Proton:

  • changes imported for upstream proton
  • changes imported for upstream build environment
  • changes imported for upstream lsteamclient
  • changes imported for upstream steamvr
  • FEX now builds as part of proton as per upstream changes
  • wine-wayland/em-10 patches rebased
  • wine-staging patches rebased
  • SDL dummy controller will no longer be active when steam input is inactive (such as when wine-wayland is enabled, in which case steam input doesn't work)
  • ffxvi (16) crash with wayland enabled fixed
  • DLSS Scaling now available
  • add PROTON_DLSS_INDICATOR to enable DLSS hud
  • add PROTON_FSR4_INDICATOR to show FSR4 watermark
  • docs: Update Readme for scaling _UPGRADE variables:

fsr4 PROTON_FSR4_UPGRADE Automatically download amdxcffx64.dll and upgrade games with FSR 3.1 to use FSR 4. Version to download can be specified by supplying it as a value, like so PROTON_FSR4_UPGRADE="4.0.1", instead of 1. Downloads version 4.0.2 of the required DLL by default. This option also disables AMD Anti-Lag 2 currently due to various issues.

fsr4hud PROTON_FSR4_INDICATOR Enable the FSR4 watermark at the top left portion of the screen.

fsr4rdna3 PROTON_FSR4_RDNA3_UPGRADE Identical to PROTON_FSR4_UPGRADE but for RDNA3 GPUs. Enables some required compatibility options and downloads version 4.0.0 of the DLL by default.

fsr3 PROTON_FSR3_UPGRADE

dlss PROTON_DLSS_UPGRADE Automatically download and use newer versions of nvngx_dlss(d|g).dll DLLs. Version to download can be specified by supplying it as a value, like so PROTON_DLSS_UPGRADE="310.2", instead of 1, to download version 310.2.1.0. This option also sets DXVK_NVAPI_DRS_SETTINGS to use the latest preset. If you provide your own config for it through this environment variable, your configuration is going to be applied..

dlsshud PROTON_DLSS_INDICATOR Enable the DLSS overlay at the bottom left portion of the screen. This is exactly the same as FSR4_WATERMARK=1

xess PROTON_XESS_UPGRADE

Protonfixes:

  • yet another fix for space engineers
  • fix for the outer worlds 2
  • ntsync disabled for SOMA
  • upscaler download handler utility added
  • Check if a directory is readable before attempting to map it.
  • fix for Zeit 2 added
  • fixes added for Death end re;Quest series from GOG
  • Add fix for "They Are Billions" crash when using Russian localization
  • Add fix for "Not For Broadcast" and "Not For Broadcast: Prologue"
  • Fix CEF issues in Duet Night Abyss
in reply to CannonGoBoom

Rumor has it this also fixes the regression with DCS hanging on the loading screen.

in reply to Spectre

So I'm worth whatever I think I'm worth? I think I'm worth the effort I put into my community of people and contributions to society in the form of my work.


Does Anyone Use their Phone without a SIM Card?


This is something I've been thinking about for a while. I've decided to get a Pixel with GrapheneOS as my next phone and I'm trying to decide the pros and cons of putting a SIM card in it. Convenience vs privacy, public wifi with a VPN vs using phone data, etc.

I can't get a SIM card where I live without ID and I'm looking to reduce being tracked as much as possible. Does anyone else do the same thing?

in reply to freedickpics

I do use my SIM card in a dumbphone, it's good for mental health too
in reply to freedickpics

When I got a new phone a while ago, I put my sim card in the new phone and kept using my old phone on wifi only.



KDE Plasma black screen with white flashes problem


streamable.com/q8mz6f

Video description: after trying to select volume control option at bottom right the screen turned black with white flashes.

This issue arises in two ways. First when booting the initial ASUS logo will show and then straight this black, flashing screen and second way it happens is when I try to select wifi, volume, network options present at bottom right area.

When this happens, pressing the power button also doesn't work, so I have to force power off the laptop by holding the power button for some seconds.

This doesn't happen every time i.e most of the times it boots correctly and most of the time trying to select options work as expected.


Operating System: Fedora Linux 43
KDE Plasma Version: 6.5.3
KDE Frameworks Version: 6.20.0
Qt Version: 6.10.1
Kernel Version: 6.17.8-300.fc43.x86_64 (64-bit)
Graphics Platform: Wayland
Processors: 8 × Intel® Core™ i5-8300H CPU @ 2.30GHz
Memory: 8 GiB of RAM (7.6 GiB usable)
Graphics Processor 1: Intel® UHD Graphics 630
Graphics Processor 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
Manufacturer: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
Product Name: TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD
System Version: 1.0

Questa voce è stata modificata (3 giorni fa)
in reply to trulyrandomguy

I don't have a fix per se but you might want to see if your Magic SysRq button works to force a reboot using Alt + SysRq + 'b'. It's surprisingly effective remaining useful during a lot of major glitches except during a full-on Kernel Panic.
Questa voce è stata modificata (3 giorni fa)




Ceding the future to China


in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

We are in the midst of a Great Leap Backward or Cultural Revolution-style assault on the domestic institutions that made America great – the rule of law, freedom of speech, academic freedom and scientific excellence, federal partnerships with research universities, openness to foreigners and their ideas, policies based on evidence and expertise rather than fake news and unsubstantiated prejudice, and the prioritisation of objectivity over political correctness.


For the longest time US liberals used weasel words like opposing authoritarianism and supporting democracy to justify the US's foreign policy from sanctions to war crimes. "Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East surrounded by authoritarian Islamist regimes", "I don't hate the Chinese I hate the authoritarian CCP and I support Taiwan because it is a democracy". Never mind the claims being false, they were a good attempt at masking their national supremacism and cultural chauvinism. US conservatives have always been more honest about being racist and just hating Arabs, Muslims, Chinese and so on. So witnessing the US decay into fascism has been a guilty pleasure of mine. US liberals now will look really silly accusing others of what their government is guilty of, but I am sure they will find a way to spin it. They are already blaming Trump on Russia, Saudi Arabia and others. Denying the fact that Trump is the US at its rawest and truest form.

Questa voce è stata modificata (3 giorni fa)
in reply to تحريرها كلها ممكن

I particularly love the dynamic of libs blaming everyone else because the shining city on a hill could never, ever produce its own rot. The perfect system, handed down by demigods on parchment, is obviously flawless. So when a walking, talking monument to greed and grievance shambles into the Oval Office, the only logical explanation is that he must be a foreign saboteur. It couldn't possibly be that he's the logical end point of a political machine fueled by dark money and cultural resentment. No, that's too boring. It's much more exciting to believe he's some secret agent, here to destroy the perfect union out of sheer jealousy. Because accepting that the city was built on a swamp, and that the smell was always coming from inside the house, would mean the storybook was a lie. And we can't have that.
Questa voce è stata modificata (2 giorni fa)


[US Sen. Patty] Murray: ICE dog attack on WA man ‘should shock the conscience’


Sensitive content

Questa voce è stata modificata (3 giorni fa)


[US Sen. Patty] Murray: ICE dog attack on WA man ‘should shock the conscience’


Sensitive content

#USA
Questa voce è stata modificata (3 giorni fa)


Texas AG Ken Paxton sues EPIC to stop Muslim housing project


The East Plano Islamic Center has pitched a residential development, formerly called EPIC City, with more than 1,000 residential units, a mosque, a K-12 faith-based school and retail shops outside of Dallas. The project drew numerous state investigations earlier this year — some for unclear reasons — including one from Paxton, who said in March he was looking into potential violations of consumer protection laws.

...

“The leaders behind EPIC City have engaged in a radical plot to destroy hundreds of acres of beautiful Texas land and line their own pockets,” Paxton said in a statement, vowing to stop the development. “I will relentlessly bring the full force of the law against anyone who thinks they can ignore the rules and hurt Texans.”



Texas AG Ken Paxton sues EPIC to stop Muslim housing project


The East Plano Islamic Center has pitched a residential development, formerly called EPIC City, with more than 1,000 residential units, a mosque, a K-12 faith-based school and retail shops outside of Dallas. The project drew numerous state investigations earlier this year — some for unclear reasons — including one from Paxton, who said in March he was looking into potential violations of consumer protection laws.

...

“The leaders behind EPIC City have engaged in a radical plot to destroy hundreds of acres of beautiful Texas land and line their own pockets,” Paxton said in a statement, vowing to stop the development. “I will relentlessly bring the full force of the law against anyone who thinks they can ignore the rules and hurt Texans.”





Immigrants approved for citizenship ‘plucked out’ of line moments before pledging allegiance: report


Immigrants were moments away from pledging allegiance to the United States in Boston — the final step of the long process to becoming a U.S. citizen — when government officials pulled them out of line, according to a new report.

The scene unfolded at Boston’s Faneuil Hall on Thursday, Dec. 4, according to the report from WGBH, a National Public Radio member station.

As people who were already approved to be naturalized — having completed the lengthy U.S. citizenship process — lined up to pledge allegiance, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) officials told them they could not continue due to their countries of origin, the outlet reported.

https://people.com/immigrants-approved-for-citizenship-pulled-out-by-officials-at-oath-ceremony-11863779




Bulldozed, crushed and buried — fate of missing aid-seekers


cross-posted from: hexbear.net/post/6959949

cross-posted from: news.abolish.capital/post/1196…
What Skwawkbox-Canary and other independent news outlets, together with local journalists and international activists have been reporting for months, has finally made it into the ‘mainstream’ media. A CNN ‘investigation‘ ‘revealed’ that the Israeli military bulldozed some of the bodies of aid-seekers slaughtered at so-called ‘aid’ stations into unmarked Gaza mass graves. Others were simply left […]

By Skwawkbox


From Canary via This RSS Feed.



in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Canada literally occupies unceded land right now.


And as I commented in another thread - I believe in response to your post - we can either collectively acknowledge the true and full cost of rectifying this situation, including fairly compensating those who are affected, or we can stick our heads in the sand and pretend that me and my kids, who were born in this country no differently than indigenous families and who know no other home, are expected to destroy our lives in service of the wrongs of the past.

If private property is affected, then the displaced people need to be fairly compensated. In general the impact on everyone needs to be considered in the calculus. I opened my eyes for the first time in this country, just like everyone else born here did, regardless of what atrocious actions were committed by those in the past. I have nowhere to go, this is my home as much as it is anyone else's.

If we don't acknowledge these facts willingly and openly i fear we will be forced to acknowledge them unwillingly.

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ doesn't like this.

in reply to RaskolnikovsAxe

You keep talking about this as something that happened in the past as opposed to something that's currently happening.
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

I'm going to talk about private land exclusively.

What happened in the past is the government appropriated the land, it seems at the very least unethically, and then sold it to private interests. Somewhere along the line an innocent citizen bought the land thinking it was freehold or otherwise was the owner's land to sell. It seems that now the land is being expropriated.

If it was never the government's land to sell, and the courts have ruled in that way, then the government needs to compensate the people to whom the land was sold.

This cost needs to be considered by the government when they negotiate with FN groups. It is the true and total cost of reconciliation. If it is excluded then it will cause enormous dissatisfaction with the entire exercise of reconciliation, and it will eventually destroy the program. If the goal is harmonious coexistence, this will be unachievable if some of the victims - and they are also victims - are pushed out and ignored.

My other adjacent point is that a full cost and schedule for reconciliation must be made clear to everyone, so that all stakeholders can understand the objective and agree on the end goal.

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ doesn't like this.

in reply to RaskolnikovsAxe

Let’s be clear about what you are actually saying here. You are describing the privatization of stolen land as if it were a simple matter of unfortunate paperwork. The government did not simply unethically appropriate the land. The settlers orchestrated a campaign of displacement and genocide, then laundered the loot through property deeds to create a class of settlers whose innocence is built on that foundational violence. That citizen did not buy freehold land. They bought a fantasy, a clean title washed in the blood of the original people who were murdered or removed from it. The courts are not handing down philosophical rulings. They are finally, begrudgingly, acknowledging a truth that Indigenous people have never stopped stating which is that the land was never Canada's to sell.

Your entire argument hinges on the moral panic of the settler who feels cheated. But where is your panic for the people who were cheated of everything? You call for the government to compensate the buyer, to make the settler whole, but this just completes the cycle of colonial logic. It says the ultimate victim of theft is the one who ended up holding the stolen goods, not the people who were robbed in the first place. You call them also victims. They're not victims, they are the beneficiaries. Unwitting perhaps, but beneficiaries nonetheless of a system that granted them property through ethnic cleansing. Reconciliation priced on making those beneficiaries happy is not reconciliation. It is the perpetuation of the same power dynamic with a polite apology attached.

When you demand a full cost and schedule, you are talking about a budget for justice. You want to put a ceiling on what is owed. But true reconciliation isn't a government program you can sabotage with stakeholder dissatisfaction. It is the unfinished business of dismantling a colonial project. If the current property owner is compensated, that is a cost of doing business for a state that built itself on theft. It is not a debt owed to the public by Indigenous people. The goal is not harmonious coexistence built on a ledger that balances the comfort of settlers against the rights of nations. The goal is justice, and justice is inherently disruptive to the unjust peace that has existed here for centuries. You cannot put a timeline on decolonization. The only thing that needs to be made clear is that the era of pretending these lands were ever legitimately Canada's to give away is over.

in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

You can wrap it in as many words as you want. What you are saying is that I, and others like me, who were born here just like you were, and just like indigenous people were have less of a claim to this country as their homeland. This is the basis that seems to allow you to justify taking away the lives of other people.

The goal can only be harmonious coexistence, or it will be doomed to fail. If your project is built on the destruction of the lives of others, then it will not succeed.

I will say again - I first opened my eyes in this country. It is my home and I know no other. I and FN peoples are the same in this regard. I am not special nor do I hold an exalted position over you, and neither do you over me. In the end I'm putting demands on the government to recognize the true and full cost of reconciliation. I'm not putting demands on FN people. I'm not sure why you feel aggrieved that I've identified another group that is being impacted by this project.

You are asking for people to sacrifice to right the wrongs of the past. I want to do this, and others do to. But if you treat them as lesser and don't try to understand the impacts on them, and you invoke academic concepts to justify why they should just 'suck it up', you're going to be unsuccessful. Eventually you have to live with these people. And like I said before, they are no different than you, no less and no more.

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ doesn't like this.

in reply to RaskolnikovsAxe

This is not about wrapping anything in words. It's about confronting the central lie you are telling yourself. You are conflating birthplace with historical claim. Being born on stolen land does not grant you the same claim as the people from whom it was stolen. That is the brutal fact of colonial history. You opened your eyes here. But the people we displaced had their eyes open here for thousands of years before you had your epiphany. To pretend those two facts are equivalent is the foundation of the injustice.

You keep talking about harmonious coexistence as the only goal. But you are demanding that this harmony be built on your terms, on the continued denial of the original crime. You want reconciliation to be a polite transaction that leaves your sense of home and ownership undisturbed. That's just perpetuation of a settlement that never ended. True coexistence begins with the uncomfortable truth that your homeland is built on the homeland of another, and that reality demands more than just a budgetary line item.

You say you are putting demands on the government, not on First Nations. But you are. Your demand is that the government prioritize compensating settlers as the true and full cost before anything else. You are framing settler dissatisfaction as the primary risk to the project. That is a direct demand on Indigenous people to wait, to accept less, to once again watch as the state manages the feelings of the beneficiaries before addressing the rights of the dispossessed. You have identified another impacted group, yes. But you have placed them at the front of the line for justice, ahead of the people who were robbed. That is why there is grievance.

No one is asking you to suck it up. You need you to wake up and understand that your personal connection to this land does not erase the collective, unbroken connection of the nations that were here first. The question is who has already sacrificed everything and who is now being asked to share a fraction of what was gained through that loss. You say we all must live together. We do. And living together means finally building a shared home where the foundation isn't the myth that we all started here with the same claim. We didn't. Justice starts when we stop pretending that we did.

in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Nobody has any claim to any land. So if being born here gives no one the right why do Indiginous have the right? They stole the land from others before them. And there is no guarantee that they would have the land still if left alone. Reality is one tribe would have started taking over / killing the others.
in reply to Auli

Ah, the classic we're all just squatters on a rock defense. This is the intellectual equivalent of throwing a smoke bomb and hoping no one notices you're trying to justify a very specific and recent theft by invoking a vague, ahistorical free-for-all. Let's unpack your masterclass in bad faith.

First, the statement nobody has any claim to any land is a philosophical thought experiment for freshman ethics seminars, not a serious framework for modern justice. If you genuinely believed that, you wouldn't be paying a mortgage or respecting property lines. You'd be trying to plant a flag in your neighbor's backyard. But you don't. You only trot out this radical nihilism when it's time to dismiss Indigenous sovereignty, because applying it universally would immediately collapse the society you benefit from.

Then we get to the core of the argument, the whole they did it too school of history. Sure, conflict and displacement happened between pre colonial societies. To then equate that with the organized, state-sanctioned project of genocide, land theft, and cultural eradication enacted by European empires is so laughably dishonest it borders on parody. It's like saying a bar fight and the Normandy invasion are the same because both involve violence. The scale, intent, and lasting structural power are so fundamentally different that only someone desperate to avoid accountability would conflate them.

Your hypothetical about one tribe taking over if left alone is pure fantasy, a just-so story you've invented to make colonialism seem inevitable. It's not history. It's fan fiction for the apologist. You're judging real people who suffered a documented catastrophe against your imaginary scenario of what might have happened, and then using your own fiction to wash your hands of the real consequences. This is the ultimate colonial mindset, projecting your own violent assumptions onto other cultures to make their dispossession seem like a natural event rather than a deliberate crime.

The punchline, of course, is that this entire line of reasoning only ever flows one way. It's only ever used to undermine Indigenous claims. You never apply this nobody has a claim logic to the current title holder, the corporation, or the state. Their deed, derived directly from that original theft, is somehow treated as sacred. So your whole philosophy is a sham. The goal isn't to debate land claims. It's to freeze the current distribution of power, which you benefit from, by pretending all claims are equally invalid except, conveniently, the one that gives you your house. It's a shell game of morality where you get to keep the prize and call everyone else a hypocrite for wanting it back. 🤡

in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

You didn't read, or chose not to understand, what I wrote, likely because you've decided who I am and have responsed to your own construct.

For one I never said it wasn't going to impact private property owners, nor did I say I diidn't expect it to. What I am saying is if you see this as a zero sum game and refuse to acknowledge the injustice and pain that will be caused to other parties in this process, and you refuse to demand (or at the very least actively obstruct) government recompense to other injured parties then I would caution that you are not headed in a constructive direction.

You're asking others to put aside their hate and move in a positive direction, but it doesn't sound like you're willing to do it. Thankfully I have hope that you are not representative.

I don't care about history with respect to claims of homeland. This country is not more yours than mine. I don't expect you to buy my cultural heritage or ancestry, and you can't expect me to do it either. You don't have a magical connection to the land - you took your first breath here and so did I. With respect to native land, this is ours, not just yours. There is a broken contract that needs to be reconciled, but this does not dictate who has more of a right to live here. If you can't accept that then you are definitely going to gave a hard time, particularly since I'm broadly a supporter of reconciliation and you can't even find a way to connect with me.

Edit I also said nothing about prioritizing one claim over another, or one compensation over another. I ask that you seriously reflect on what you've assumed about me.

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 giorno fa)
in reply to RaskolnikovsAxe

I directly addressed the points you were attempting to make. What you're saying is that you think your needs are more important than those of Indigenous people whose land you occupy. It's very clear what you're actually saying despite all the sophistry you're using. You are a supporter of reconciliation entirely on your terms, that's not what reconciliation is.

Your whole argument is inherently premised on prioritizing one claim over another. The fact that you don't even understand the implications of what you said yourself is frankly hilarious.

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 giorno fa)
in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

I never said prioritizing. I said both expropriation if appropriate, but also compensation to those who lost land. I said both.

You clearly think of all of the people like me as second class citizens, at least with respect to homeland. But generally, you do not consider the people on the other side to be equals with their own value and their own pain. You have made it clear in the way you insult me and call me a clown, and misinterpret what I say. I have not insulted you once.

You seem to believe that this is a zero sum game and we must lose so you can win. I will not be able to understand that position. It will only lead to worse outcomes.

I'm sorry we can't find a way to understand each other.

in reply to RaskolnikovsAxe

It's like you don't understand what the word implied means.

You clearly think of all of the people like me as second class citizens, at least with respect to homeland. But generally, you do not consider the people on the other side to be equals with their own value and their own pain. You have made it clear in the way you insult me and call me a clown, and misinterpret what I say. I have not insulted you once.


See, you're just doing projecting here because you very clearly see First Nations people as second class citizens whose rights are superseded by your own. Nobody is misinterpreting anything you said here.

You seem to believe that this is a zero sum game and we must lose so you can win. I will not be able to understand that position. It will only lead to worse outcomes.


More projecting, because nowhere did I say anything of the sort. You're just putting words in my mouth because you're unable to engage honestly with what's being said to you.

in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

This is not going anywhere. I've made it clear that I don't think of anyone as second class, I never diminished FN claims, and I think I was abundantly clear about what I was asserting, so any implying that you see is entirely of your own making.

You don't trust me and you are obviously not willing to understand me. There's nothing here to discuss. I gave my honest and forthright concerns and you see it as an attack.

I've got enough stresses in my life. I don't need to create more online. Best of luck to you.

in reply to RaskolnikovsAxe

Yup, you made it clear that you see your property rights as being more important than the rights of the people whom Canada conducted a genocide against. I understand you perfectly fine. Bye.
in reply to Auli

just look at this brave colonizer
Questa voce è stata modificata (2 giorni fa)

in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

Russia was for? They are literally trying to take over another country at the moment.

don't like this

in reply to Pyr

When you definitely understand what colonialism is and why the war in Ukraine started.

in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

The federation said it will seek to strip Lyskun of all awards she won and will appeal to international sports institutions to apply competition restrictions on her.


Totally normal behavior form that federation/association



Russian Forces Take Control of Rovnoye in DPR, Kucherovka in Kharkov


in reply to jankforlife

A single guy waving a flag and dying 2 min later to a drone doesnt mean ya captured shit ya nazi fucks
in reply to n3m37h

ya nazi fucks



in reply to davel

So man poor arguments

take the NY Times artile from 2024

The top court of the United Nations ruled on Friday that it would take up the question of whether Ukraine committed genocide in its Donetsk and Luhansk regions, an accusation at the heart of Russia’s argument for its 2022 full-scale invasion.


No convictions, just accusations from Russia

So many garbage articles and load of factual worpress sites lmfao

Putin is a fascist fuck and is closer to nazism than even the Ukranians holding literal swastika flags. if you see interviews with the ukranian 'nazi' then you would realize they are not brutal murders but want what's best for their country. Its about the national socalism, what got hitler in power in the first place before he became a meth addicted warmonger.

And Russians weren't much better than actual nazi's during WWII.

don't like this

in reply to n3m37h

I am too lazy to point the arrow to the correct place, but you get the point

Questa voce è stata modificata (3 giorni fa)
in reply to Bobr

There is videos of Russians in ukrainian drab, Russia was supposed to take Prok 2 years ago and in the past month they claimed to have fully encircled and taken prok, which is still not entirely true.

Russia is a fucking joke of a country and Putin should be hung by his testicles

in reply to n3m37h

BUT WHATABOUT THE SHELLING OF BERLIN.


Don't start a war if you don't want a war

holding a flag/having an ideology


You have fully transformed into a cryptofascist who complains about being disliked for "just a difference of opinion" (the opinion is that non-whites aren't human and must be enslaved or exterminated)

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 giorni fa)
in reply to RiverRock

the fuck are you talking about, Russia started the war in 2014 when they invaded Crimea.

Ive seen lots of interviews with these so called nazi and not a single one was about killing non arian people lmao

Go suck Putin again

don't like this

in reply to n3m37h

Wrong, Ukraine began ethnic cleansing of their russian-speaking minority in 2014 after the US coup

Ive seen lots of interviews with these so called nazi and not a single one was about killing non arian people lmao


"Well this Hitler guy was just talking about making Germany great again, not killing people, you're just making things up"

So-called nazis bruh they're doing the salute and waving the swastika, at this point you just don't want to believe your own eyes because it would mean you're wrong, and somehow being wrong is more uncomfortable for you than being a nazi.

You're not that much of a dipshit, nobody is. Purging anyone outside the "master race" is the nazi's whole thing. You just want to plug your ears and shut your eyes and keep cheering for the goose steppers for some suspicious-ass reason

go suck putin again


You fascists sure do love turning everything into weird homophobia, huh? Fuck outta here, loser. Your favorite seig heilers are losing the war, and no amount of desperate spin can change that.

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 giorni fa)
in reply to RiverRock

Wrong, Ukraine began ethnic cleansing of their russian-speaking minority in 2024 after the US coup


You mean 2014.

in reply to RiverRock

Putin is the fascist here, look up the definition dumbass

Putin has invaded Georgia, Transnistria, threatens lithuiana and estonia and several other countries.

Russia can get fucked

Sincerly, A Canadian

don't like this

in reply to n3m37h

Hmm actually I think these are the fascists


Sincerely, a Canadian


A) Take that shit back to reddit

B) Your parliament gave a standing ovation to a member of the Waffen SS for his actions during the second world war

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 giorni fa)
in reply to RiverRock

And which country Signed a deal to not invade so long as their neighbour gets rid of the nukes but does so anyways and then proceeds to attack a bunch of neighbouring countries...

Go spred your bullshit propaganda elsewhere

Putin is the fascist.

Ukraine at least follows geneva conventions regarding POWs (not killing surrendered soldiers, fair treatment, no torture, etc) unlike Russia which attacks civilians (apartments, hospitals, schools, grocery stores, etc), killing their own for not going on suicide missions, Russian commanders stealing money from the ones sent on suicide missions.

You can spout Russian talking points that have 0 evidence, but there is lots of evidence showing Ukraine is on the right sode of history.

Slava Ukraine, Crimea is Ukraine

in reply to n3m37h

the irony of you braying about everybody who disagrees with you being a fascist and then finishing with a literal fascist slogan is just 🤌

mronline.org/2022/11/07/the-hi…

in reply to RiverRock

How is attacking hospitals and schools not nazism?? Putin is a greatan for having his military kill children and the sick....

nytimes.com/2025/10/22/world/e…

hrw.org/report/2023/11/09/tank…

abc.net.au/news/2022-04-06/20-…

globalnews.ca/news/9925644/rus…

aljazeera.com/news/2025/10/29/…

bbc.com/news/articles/cj0y45md…

hrw.org/news/2024/07/11/russia…

rferl.org/a/33551369.html

press.un.org/en/2024/sc15761.d…

reuters.com/world/europe/russi…

in reply to n3m37h

How is war not nazism??


Damn maybe you are that much of a dipshit, never say never

So what you're saying is that every single participant in WW2 was nazis? Oops, all nazis? Come on lmao

in reply to RiverRock

That is not what I said.

Attacking civilians is an act of terrorism, not war.

I have no clue what the fuck you're on about, stop trying to make stupid arguments by putting words in my mouth.

I am pointing out the acts of Putin are fascism.
Fascism and Hitlers Nazism are one in the same. Military dictatorships that use fear and propaganda to control the population along with military expansionism.

Youre a terrible propagandist

don't like this

in reply to n3m37h

ya nazi fucks


this is about the russian forces capturing rovnoye, not the ukrainians

Unknown parent

lemmy - Collegamento all'originale
BrainInABox
"If you disagree with me, you aren't human"


Japan Pleads for US Backing as It Ramps Up Militaristic Urge Against China




in reply to jankforlife

Yeaaaahhhh, I can't back you on that one. There's a difference between being an imperfect leftist and being a CIA plant. Like Hasan, Ryan Grim, Krystal Ball? Flawed, but genuine. Mamdani literally hasn't even stepped foot in office yet but at least he freaks out fascists.

I'll give you AOCIA and Plattner, and it's Bernie's time for the nursing home.


in reply to jankforlife

As I initially checked the Wikipedia article for Uyghur Genocide it took me about 1 minute to find that the article had his name spread all over it and the sources it cited. He works for the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation, which is funded by the USA.

Every source you check eventually circles back to him. There is also not really any video or photo evidence, compare this to the terabytes of videos of the gaza genocide. There is like 1 or 2 picture that shows a prison and curled up inmates, this doesnt look good but still better than Guantanamo or the El Salvadorian prisons.

China accuses the USA of funding terrorists in that region, which also lacks good sources but given the USA track record of funding separatists for regime change for example in 1953 Iran "coup d'état" and the USA listing China as their enemy number 1 e.g. in their newest national security strategy paper, it doesnt seem too far fetched.

Yes this doesnt mean there cant be possibly any wrong-doing on the Chinese side but the evidence for that is scarce at best and manufactured at worst.

The one China policy is also a direct result from China winning WW2 against Japan, Japan used to colonize Taiwan and genocided the Chinese. Imagine questioning other results from WW2 like Polands indepence.

Also the british used to occupy Tibet and looking at other british occupations like Palestine or Sudan (with Egypt) it gets pretty clear that they left nothing but chaos. So given all this history it, to me, seems justified that China wants to keep their country together and looking at satellite pictures from Xinjiang we dont see rivers of blood like in Sudan or thousands of pictures of child amputees like in Palestine.

Its really convenient how in the West every separatist movement like Catalonia in Spain or the Reichsbürger in Germany is immediately not valid, why all separatist movements of the Wests "adversaries" are immediately legit.

in reply to j5906

You are probably one of the 3 feddit.org users who can think critically.



Why I Think the AI Bubble Will Not Burst




GP Abu Dhabi, l'analisi: Norris campione, ERA ORA! E grazie a un superbo Max


Davvero contento per Lando perché ha avuto una super crescita. Peccato per il finale al cardiopalma evitabile, se solo McLaren non avesse deciso di improvvisarsi l'alter ego della Ferrari con strategie sbagliatissime negli ultimi 4 GP.


in reply to flabbergast

Maybe one for the drivers and one for the cameras? I see that the top one has a big FIA logo on it, but I don't know if that matters.

Thinking about it, I remember that the official weaver was actress Ana De Armas and maybe UAE wouldn't like a woman doing something (it's an Islamic country after all).

Questa voce è stata modificata (3 giorni fa)


Hegseth Defends Boat Bombings as New Details Further Undermine Administration's Justifications


cross-posted from: news.abolish.capital/post/1217…

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Saturday defended the Trump administration's policy of bombing suspected drug-trafficking vessels even as new details further undermined the administration's stated justifications for the policy.

According to the Guardian, Hegseth told a gathering at the Ronald Reagan presidential library that the boat bombings, which so far have killed at least 87 people, are necessary to protect Americans from illegal drugs being shipped to the US.

"If you’re working for a designated terrorist organization and you bring drugs to this country in a boat, we will find you and we will sink you," Hegseth said. "Let there be no doubt about it."

However, leaked details about a classified briefing delivered to lawmakers last week by Adm. Frank Bradley about a September 2 boat strike cast new doubts on Hegseth's justifications.

CNN reported on Friday that Bradley told lawmakers that the boat taken out by the September 2 attack was not even headed toward the US, but was going "to link up with another, larger vessel that was bound for Suriname," a small nation in the northeast of South America.

While Bradley acknowledged that the boat was not heading toward the US, he told lawmakers that the strike on it was justified because the drugs it was carrying could have theoretically wound up in the US at some point.

Additionally, NBC News reported on Saturday that Bradley told lawmakers that Hegseth had ordered all 11 men who were on the boat targeted by the September 2 strike to be killed because "they were on an internal list of narco-terrorists who US intelligence and military officials determined could be lethally targeted."

This is relevant because the US military launched a second strike during the September 2 operation to kill two men who had survived the initial strike on their vessel, which many legal experts consider to be either a war crime or an act of murder under domestic law.

Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, watched video of the September 2 double-tap attack last week, and he described the footage as “one of the most troubling things I’ve seen in my time in public service.”

“Any American who sees the video that I saw will see its military attacking shipwrecked sailors,” Himes explained. “Now, there’s a whole set of contextual items that the admiral explained. Yes, they were carrying drugs. They were not in position to continue their mission in any way... People will someday see this video and they will see that that video shows, if you don’t have the broader context, an attack on shipwrecked sailors.”

While there has been much discussion about the legality of the September 2 double-tap strike in recent days, some critics have warned that fixating on this particular aspect of the administration's policy risks taking the focus off the illegality of the boat-bombing campaign as a whole.

Daphne Eviatar, director for security and human rights for Amnesty International USA, said on Friday that the entire boat-bombing campaign has been "illegal under both domestic and international law."

"All of them constitute murder because none of the victims, whether or not they were smuggling illegal narcotics, posed an imminent threat to life," she said. "Congress must take action now to stop the US military from murdering more people in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.