Salta al contenuto principale


in reply to silence7

C.R.M.L.S. and a few homeowners told The Times they questioned the validity of property-level forecasts, and C.R.M.L.S. said it grew “suspicious” when models showed high flood risk in places that hadn’t flooded in decades.


Who wants to tell them that floods don’t always just target the same places all the time?

in reply to silence7

The indisputable fact that flood maps are going to have to be updated based on climate change makes some people uncomfortable: especially those whose activities are worsening climate change, and those whose income will be greater if they sweep the bad news under the rug.

Well, fuck them. People are entitled to the best information so they can make informed decisions.









EU climate chief criticises China, India and Saudi pushback on carbon tax


cross-posted from: mander.xyz/post/43026095

Web archive link

...

The carbon border tax, which comes into force from January, was behind an attempt by the big exporters to scupper wider negotiations on climate action at the latest UN summit in Brazil.

Speaking in the aftermath at COP30, Wopke Hoekstra told the Financial Times that the petrostates had also been “more assertive” across the board in a bid to thwart climate agreements as the shift to cleaner energy systems accelerates.

“Some of those making money out of [fossil fuels] are seeking to prolong that process. We have seen this quite explicitly,” he said. “Some of the petrostates are seeking to at least slow down rather than speed up [the energy transition].”

He added: “I have sensed a certain sense of assertiveness that might not have been there five or 10 years ago.”

...

During public and closed-door meetings at the two-week talks, some of the developing countries argued the tax, or carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), was a unilateral measure that would drive up costs, restrict trade and hinder their ability to grow their economies.

The tax will initially apply to products such as steel, cement and fertilisers, and aims to ensure imported goods meet similar green standards to those produced inside the EU or face an additional charge.

...

Hoekstra said the criticism was “clearly not very credible”, adding that in one-on-one conversations many countries “acknowledge it is clearly a climate tool” rather than a trade measure.

...

More than 80 countries had rallied around a proposal at COP30 for a so-called road map to help countries wean their economies off fossil fuels.
But the plan failed to appear in the final agreement after objection from more than 30 other countries [particularly China, Russia, and petro-states in the Middle East].

...








Global race to secure critical minerals for weapons threatens climate, warns report


The study from the Transition Security Project – a joint US and UK venture – reveals how the Pentagon is stockpiling huge stores of critical minerals that are needed for a range of climate technologies including solar panels, wind turbines, electric vehicles and battery storage.


If Cars Are Too Expensive, Just Pump More Gas. What?


The net benefit is put at just $24 billion or, using households as a proxy for families, a princely $181 per household spread over five years. The $925 figure, meanwhile, equates to less than 2% of today’s average vehicle price. Even assuming it were actually realized, at $3 per gallon it would be eaten up by extra gasoline costs within three years.

...

In the real world, relaxing mileage standards, along with the earlier removal of penalties for missing them, will spur Detroit to sell more of the higher margin, lower fuel-economy, trucks and SUVs at the core of its business model, as opposed to shifting production toward smaller, cheaper models.


The fuel economy standard being repealed is one that's incredibly beneficial to consumers — it both encourages the production of less expensive vehicles, and saves on fuel costs.

in reply to silence7

This is the end of US car makers besides Tesla. Very few countries like to buy those massive American trucks and SUVs and without EVs selling normal cars is going to be difficult in many large markets, such as China and Europe. GM has basically left Europe already and Ford is firing workers like crazy. Stellantis is very likely to follow, but they have strong European brands and probably manage a bit longer.

in reply to silence7

"A major reason for this unusual build-up of heat may be changes to the Atlantic Ocean that buffets the New England coastline. The oceans are absorbing more than 90% of the excess heat trapped by greenhouse gases in Earth’s atmosphere, with recent years seeing record-breaking ocean temperatures."


in reply to silence7

They just want to huff those fumes, in their case it might increase brain cells
in reply to silence7

Pretty soon it will be illegal to have state laws crippling gas vehicles.







These companies want to block the sun to cool the planet | The world’s most controversial climate solution is becoming a private industry.


Theoretically, rogue billionaires could afford to at least start changing the climate on their own. That’s the premise of the science fiction novel “Termination Shock,” which inspired Iseman to found Make Sunsets in 2022.


Dystopian sci-fi isn't something you're supposed to imitate.

Access options:
* gift link — registration required
* archive.today

in reply to silence7

ugh. atmosphere hijinks. Im fine with space shades. Heck preferably collect the solar energy and beam it as energy. Easy enough to reverse but aerosols are just more hole digging.
in reply to silence7

I suspect that this won't work out but those in charge will somehow end up creating the sonnengewehr.

Starting from 1MM dollars





in reply to silence7

Individual action is a myth invented by the FF lobby as a smokescreen for the mega-polluters who could actually enact a significant reversal and choose not to because money. I've been aware of the problem for decades. It didn't do shit. Humanity is cooked, so try to enjoy it while it lasts.
in reply to bitjunkie

The article is talking about countries that are not adhering to international pacts because they are small


in reply to Track_Shovel

The right wants to keep and strengthen hierarchy. The problem with renewables is that they are much harder to control. Solar can be installed on the roofs, balconies and the like, which can be done by a lot of people. So hard to control. Even wind turbines can be easily built by a village or other larger group, like a rich farmer. Compared that to a gas power plant, which takes millions in investment or even more so a nuclear power plant, where we are talking billions. That is also true for things like EVs, which can be charged at home using solar.

There is a lifestyle where you own your own home, have some solar on the roof, charge an EV with it and have a garden producing some food. That is like 2/3 of a normal persons budget. So if you can work a bit to make ends means, that can create a lot of freedom. Especially if it is self employed job and considering that your basic needs are mostly covered that risk is acceptable. That sort of population would be a nightmare to control in a hierarchy.

in reply to WoodScientist

Fair point, but during all that time information was centralized. You couldn't talk to people from the next city-state over, you couldn't read the holy text, you would never see the consequences of slavery, you wouldn't hear another country's public radio use car ownership as the premise of a joke, you couldn't see the victims of genocide livestream their slaughter.

With the free internet, every day is an experience that we have more in common with people across the world than with capital owners.

Why would they be resorting to something as self-destructive as fascism if they weren't desperate? Do you think billionaires like kissing Trump's ring and losing billions on protectionism? They just prefer it over equality.

in reply to Track_Shovel

Global stability would increase if all governments invested in green energy

in reply to silence7

California back slides all the time. It’s banned for now but give it a couple of years and They will backslide somehow. This is America, land of the backsliders

  • 2020 ban → 2022 backslide/delay — Flavored tobacco
  • 2014 ban → 2016–2020 backslide — Plastic bags (thicker “reusable” plastic bags allowed)
  • 2020 ban → 2021–2022 backslide — Foam takeout containers (local rollback delays)
  • 2006 ban/rule → 2010–2024 backslides — Diesel truck emissions (multiple extensions)
  • 2018 ban → 2019–2020 backslide — Animal-tested cosmetics (federal conflict exemptions)
  • 2022 ban → 2023–2024 backslide — Gas car phase-out (hybrid carve-outs, compliance easing)


Operation Bluebird – La bataille d’une startup pour arracher la marque Twitter des mains d’Elon Musk


C’est un scénario qui semble tout droit sorti d’une série juridique télévisée, mais qui se joue actuellement dans les bureaux de l’USPTO (l'office américain des brevets et des marques). Une startup de Virginie, baptisée non sans ironie "Operation Bluebird

Logo de Twitter sur fond bleu.
C’est un scénario qui semble tout droit sorti d’une série juridique télévisée, mais qui se joue actuellement dans les bureaux de l’USPTO (l’office américain des brevets et des marques). Une startup de Virginie, baptisée non sans ironie « Operation Bluebird », a lancé cette semaine une offensive contre l’empire d’Elon Musk. Leur objectif ? Rien de moins que de faire annuler les marques déposées « Twitter » et « Tweet » détenues par X Corporation, expliquant que le multimilliardaire les a purement et simplement abandonnées.

Si cette démarche juridique aboutit, elle pourrait marquer l’un des retournements de situation les plus spectaculaires de l’histoire de la tech avec le retour du véritable Twitter, l’oiseau bleu et tout ce qu’il représentait, sous une nouvelle direction. Le cœur de la pétition déposée par Operation Bluebird repose sur l’abandon, un concept clé du droit de la propriété intellectuelle. Selon la startup, Elon Musk a fait bien plus que simplement changer un logo, il a délibérément et publiquement détruit la marque Twitter. Le texte est sans équivoque:

« Les marques TWITTER et TWEET ont été éradiquées des produits, services et du marketing de X Corp., abandonnant effectivement la marque historique, sans aucune intention d’en reprendre l’usage. L’oiseau Twitter a été cloué au sol. »


Les fondateurs d’Operation Bluebird, dont l’avocat Michael Peroff, s’appuient sur les propres déclarations du PDG de X pour étayer leur dossier. En juillet 2023, il avait tweeté une phrase désormais célèbre: « Nous dirons bientôt adieu à la marque twitter et, progressivement, à tous les oiseaux ». Pour Peroff et ses associés, c’était le signal que la marque était libre d’être revendiquée. En droit américain, si l’une d’elles n’est plus utilisée et que son propriétaire n’a pas l’intention de s’en resservir, elle peut potentiellement être annulée et réattribuée.

twitter.com/elonmusk/status/16…

Le projet – Ressusciter la place publique numérique


Mais Operation Bluebird n’est pas qu’une simple manœuvre de trolls juridiques. Derrière ce nom de code se cachent des vétérans de l’industrie, dont Stephen Coates, qui n’est autre que l’ancien directeur juridique de Twitter. Leur ambition est concrète, lancer un nouveau réseau social à l’adresse Twitter.new. Un prototype fonctionnel existe déjà et la plateforme invite dès à présent les utilisateurs à réserver leurs noms d’utilisateur. Pour lui, l’objectif est de retrouver la magie perdue de l’ancien Twitter. Il évoque avec nostalgie l’époque où la plateforme était véritablement le pouls de l’actualité mondiale:

« Je me souviens d’il y a quelque temps, des célébrités réagissaient à mon contenu sur Twitter pendant le Super Bowl ou de grands événements. Et nous voulons que cette expérience revienne, cette place publique globale où nous sommes tous connectés. »


Malgré l’émergence de concurrents sérieux comme Threads (Meta), Mastodon ou Bluesky, aucun n’a réussi à capturer l’essence de ce qu’était Twitter avant le rachat de 2022. Michael Peroff souligne qu’aucune alternative n’a atteint l’échelle nécessaire pour peser dans la conversation nationale de la même manière.
Écran affichant le message 'We Are Bringing It Back' sur un fond bleu, avec un bouton 'Request Your Handle' en bas.

Une opportunité commerciale face à la dérive de X


Au-delà de la nostalgie, il y a une logique économique implacable derrière Operation Bluebird. Depuis la transformation de Twitter en X, la plateforme a vu fuir de nombreux annonceurs, effrayés par la montée des discours extrémistes, des arnaques et des contenus pour adultes non modérés. Une étude récente de Kantar Marketplace, publiée en septembre 2024, révélait que 26 % des spécialistes du marketing interrogés prévoyaient d’abandonner leurs campagnes publicitaires sur X. C’est précisément là que Peroff voit une ouverture. Les marques sont coincées sur ce réseau social faute d’alternative viable offrant la même réactivité. Operation Bluebird promet donc un retour à une modération plus stricte et un environnement plus sûr pour les marques, utilisant le nom et le logo (l’oiseau emblématique) pour rassurer instantanément le marché. Alors que Threads commence à peine à intégrer de la publicité et que Bluesky reste pour l’instant sans annonces, un nouveau Twitter capitalisant sur une marque mondialement connue pourrait théoriquement séduire les entreprises orphelines de l’ère pré-Musk.

Les experts juridiques sont partagés


La grande question demeure: cette audacieuse tentative a-t-elle une chance réelle d’aboutir ? Les avis d’experts en propriété intellectuelle sont nuancés, mais la porte n’est pas totalement fermée. La situation est complexe. X pourrait défendre ses marques s’il parvient à prouver qu’il les utilise encore, même de manière minime, ou qu’il a l’intention de les réutiliser. Mais un simple usage symbolique ne suffirait pas. C’est là tout le paradoxe, tout le monde appelle encore le site « Twitter » par habitude, mais l’entreprise fait tout pour effacer ce nom. X Corporation aura quand même du mal à se défendre. L’argument de l’abandon est puissant lorsque le PDG lui-même a publiquement rejeté l’ancienne identité.

Vers un Twitter 2.0 ?


Pour l’instant, ni Elon Musk ni X Corporation n’ont répondu aux demandes de commentaires. Mais le silence ne durera probablement pas. Si l’USPTO donnait raison à Operation Bluebird, cela créerait un précédent fascinant dans le monde des affaires. Imaginez un instant, fin de l’année prochaine, vous pourriez vous connecter sur Twitter.new, voir le logo de l’oiseau bleu et retrouver une plateforme gérée par d’anciens cadres de l’entreprise, pendant qu’Elon Musk continuerait de gérer X de son côté. Ce scénario, qui semblait impossible il y a encore quelques mois, est désormais une possibilité juridique tangible. La bataille pour l’âme (et le nom) de l’oiseau bleu ne fait que commencer.

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)


The red USB key, the little weakness that will lose you




Poland Weighs Donating MiG-29 Jets to Ukraine in Exchange for Drone, Missile Tech


The Polish armed forces’ General Staff said on Tuesday that “talks are underway,” noting that the aging Soviet-era aircraft are nearing the end of their operational life and will not be modernized.


Archived version: archive.is/newest/kyivpost.com…


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.



Is Europe ready to pull the trigger? Officials whisper about dumping US treasuries if Trump cuts Ukraine deal


European governments US Treasuries: European governments are considering a radical economic strategy by possibly selling off US Treasury bonds to counter a feared Trump-Putin agreement that could jeopardize Ukraine's security. This unprecedented response could trigger a financial crisis in the US and severely impact the global economy.


Archived version: archive.is/20251209220744/econ…


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.




Fact check: debunking Trump’s claims on immigration and affordability in Pennsylvania


The US president made baseless claims during remarks on cost of living that meandered into racism and bigotry

Donald Trump made a series of false and baseless claims in Pennsylvania on Tuesday during a speech that was billed as an address on affordability, but quickly became a meandering, campaign-style rally.



The US is identified as part of the threat picture in Denmark


For the first time, the United States is being identified as part of the threat picture against Denmark.


Archived version: archive.is/newest/swedenherald…


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)


US could ask tourists for five-year social media history before entry


The plan would affect people from countries, including the UK, which can fill out a form in lieu of a visa.


Archived version: archive.is/20251210115421/bbc.…


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.



US threatens new ICC sanctions unless court pledges not to prosecute Trump


President Donald Trump's administration wants the International Criminal Court to amend its founding document to ensure it does not investigate the Republican president and his top officials, a Trump administration official said, threatening new U.S. sanctions on the court if it did not.


Archived version: archive.is/20251210120244/reut…


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)