Salta al contenuto principale




in reply to silence7

I don't see this as a big deal. We all pretty much know what we're in for, even if we're not familiar with the area. You know Texas is hot, California catches fire and the Gulf Coast catches hurricanes.

In any case, I wouldn't trust a private company's data on climate risks. If I'm considering such a huge spend, going to do some due diligence. FEMA gave me a flood map in seconds, free.

Kinda funny the realtors backed Zillow up on this. Zillow should have told them to get bent, we need this because our competition has it. What are they gonna do? Not use Zillow? 😆

in reply to silence7

zillow is primarily a tech company. and it's run by incompetent techbros who should have been fired the instant they laid people off for no reason other than moronic executive decisions had predictably disastrous outcomes (Zillow Offers)

in reply to silence7

The only 'customers' for this are going to be governments. It's just a government program with private legal embezzlers.





Which Car Brands Have the Best Long-Term Reliability? Tesla is The Least Reliable Car


Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)






US EPA Erases Mention of Humans Causing Climate Change From Some Web Pages


An E.P.A. site listing the causes of climate change no longer includes the main one: human activity.


And in particular, the burning of fossil fuels is the big one. This is a pure political decision driven by the patronage machine that fossil fuel magnates fund.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/09/climate/epa-website-climate-change-causes.html?unlocked_article_code=1.7U8.Bzg2.ZhXW88Ob_upg

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)


in reply to silence7

I was kind of amazed to learn this in the article:

Recent polling by Abacus Data found that only 13 per cent of voters ranked climate change as one of their top three issues, well back of concerns like the cost of living (64 per cent) and Donald Trump (34 per cent). Among Liberal voters, the share only rises to 16 per cent.


I guess, I'm lucky enough to be in a position where I'm not personally very affected by inflation or tarrifs so maybe climate concerns are a luxury I can afford which others can't.

Downloaded the Abacus report... The cbc was actually charitable, climate change was the 9th most mentioned thing when people were asked to list top issues, behind housing, healthcare, immigration, crime, job security etc. Ooof.

in reply to MyBrainHurts

Its been a longstanding issue. Lots of people care, but its not at the top of their priority list.
in reply to silence7

Why do people quote books written by politicians? Those books are designed to get people to vote for them.

Carney is killing any climate plan because the idiots who vote in Canada don't care about the environment, they would have voted for anyone who killed the Carbon levy, which was never explained by media and branded a "tax" by the Conservatives.





This year is expected to match 2023 as one of the warmest on record, second only to 2024, EU scientists warn. They cite greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels as the main cause of global warming.


If confirmed, this would mark the first time global average temperatures have exceeded 1.5 degrees Celsius for three consecutive years since humans began burning fossil fuels on an industrial scale during the 1850–1900 pre-industrial period, C3S said.


The formal announcement is posted here as well as on 𝕏itter.









dispelling myths


distributing the future isn't possible when profit is measured by greed alone

we are all expenditures in such a capitalist reasoning

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)






Extreme heat hampers children’s early learning


Children regularly exposed to temperatures over 30°C (86°F) have lower scores on literacy and numeracy tests at age 3 to 4, according to UNICEF data from six countries


Archived copies of the article:
* archive.today
* ghostarchive.org
*

The paper is here



in reply to silence7

And sometimes the plugged ones were done so long ago that they're effectively not plugged, just capped off a few feet below ground.

in reply to schizoidman

The headline implies the US was ever in the running for climate solutions
in reply to glimse

Under Biden the US was actually moving in the right direction with the Inflation Reduction Act. That would have helped a lot, but the American people rather elected Trump again.
in reply to glimse

Yes and most of the news about China was specifically about shutting down the United States. So when I read those stories I just feel it’s propaganda. Regardless of what shit hole the United States is in, absolutely no data from China can be trusted.
in reply to velindora

Even taking the Chinese government at its word, they're getting ~60% of their energy from Coal, and are opening new coal-fired power plants at a pace not matched by any other industrialized country. Framing their solar adventures as anything other than supplementary power for their growing fossil fuel economy is wildly irresponsible. China is #1 producing 3x the CO2 as the next largest producer (United States) and they're not resting on their laurels.

People in the pro-Xi camp might claim China is planning to transition to renewables based on the rate of growth of their alternative energy sector, but that's not a claim the Party has ever made or is likely to make. Their top priority is growing their economy, preventing global warming isn't even on the list. They over-produced solar because it seemed like the west was signalling they were going in that direction, but now that demand is depressed, they're likely to cut back production. Based on the Chinese government numbers on installed capacity vs. actual solar energy power use, they're sending surplus panels to the Tibetan desert to rot.

The reporters at NPR are pining for more competent authoritarians. They don't care about global warming either, or they'd do actual journalism on the subject.

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)
in reply to Five

Analysis of the China's own plans, and projections, shows we will still hit heights that will destroy the world as we know it, and might still end up in an minor runaway warming period that could be an extinction event in the long term.


"Causing irreversible environmental instability:" Panel Unveils “Dark Side” of the China’s Green Energy Push in Tibet


cross-posted from: lemmy.sdf.org/post/46910935

Archived

[...]

China’s dominance in the renewable energy supply chain—especially in rare earth minerals, copper and lithium processing—has led to massive industrial expansion in Tibet. While promoted internationally as sustainable climate action, many projects have instead resulted in water contamination, ecosystem collapse, cultural displacement, and intensified political repression.

“Under the guise of green energy development, Tibet is being reshaped to fuel China’s economic and geopolitical ambitions,” said Tempa Gyaltsen Zamlha, Deputy Director of the Tibet Policy Institute, in his welcome address. “These mines and mega-dams are marketed as climate-friendly, but they have devastated Tibet’s rivers, grasslands, wildlife habitats, and traditional communities.”

The Tibetan Plateau, often called the Third Pole, contains the world’s largest reserve of freshwater outside the polar regions. Its rivers support nearly 1.9 billion people across Asia. Yet, scientists have warned that the plateau is warming at nearly twice the global average, accelerating glacial melt and causing irreversible environmental instability.

[...]



China risks emissions rebound amid policy shifts, experts warn


cross-posted from: lemmy.sdf.org/post/46910756

Archived

The world’s biggest carbon polluter is expected to keep total emissions flat in 2025 despite rising energy demand – a sign that clean power may, for the first time, fully offset the growth in electricity consumption, the analysis by the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA) showed.

The country’s emissions only rose by 0.6% in 2024, a significantly slower pace of growth than the previous year, according to official Chinese government data published on Thursday.

But the Finland-based research group cautioned that a “concerning” policy environment for the next few years increased the risk of an emissions rebound. It added that China was also set to miss its key target for cutting carbon intensity – CO2 emissions per unit of gross domestic product – this year, meaning steeper reductions will be needed to hit its headline 2030 climate goal of slashing carbon intensity by 65%.

[...]

Record solar energy installations and strong growth in wind power capacity have increased the share of non-fossil fuel electricity this year, with emissions from the power sector set to decline for the first time since 2016, the report said. But that progress has been partially countered by the rapidly growing use of coal for the production of plastics and other chemical products, meaning overall emissions are expected to remain stable.

At the same time, experts have warned that China’s new pricing system for solar and wind projects risks slowing the clean energy boom. Under the new policy introduced last June, developers of new solar and wind power plants need to secure contracts with provincial authorities through competitive auctions, instead of being guaranteed a fixed price.

[...]

Coal power plants, on the other hand, are protected from this market-based system, relying instead on long-term power purchase agreements that lock in prices, Schäpe said, describing it as “unfair competition”.

China’s rapidly expanding coal power fleet is adding to the concerns. In 2025, the country has added the largest amount of coal-fired capacity since 2015, while progress on retiring older plants remains very slow, CREA’s report highlighted.

This runs contrary to a pledge made by President Xi Jinping in 2021 to “strictly control” new coal power projects. That commitment was omitted from Beijing’s updated national climate plan (NDC) submitted in late October ahead of COP30.

[...]

https://www.climatechangenews.com/2025/12/04/china-risks-emissions-rebound-amid-policy-shifts-experts-warn/


in reply to silence7

Whoever signed off in this, both on the parts of shell and that museum, should all be jailed, at least for a year, and I'm not kidding

This is such a transparent and obvious attempt to subverse kids minds with a narrative that will destroy the world, but it will make the CEO a lot of money!

Fuck all of you, especially the ones at the museum; Shells execs are evil phychopaths, what is your excuse?



Which Car Brands Have the Best Long-Term Reliability? Tesla is The Least Reliable Car


Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)