Steve Bannon isn't wrong: for his brand of nihilistic politics to win, all he has to do is "flood the zone with shit," demoralizing people to the point where they no longer even *try* to learn the truth.
--
If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
pluralistic.net/2024/04/05/cor…
1/
reshared this
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •This is really just a more refined, more potent version of the tactical doubt sown by Big Tobacco about whether smoking caused cancer, a playbook later adopted by the fossil fuel industry to sell climate denial. You know Darrell Huff's 1954 classic *How To Lie With Statistics*? Huff was a Big Tobacco shill (his next book, which wasn't ever published, was *How To Lie With Cancer Statistics*).
2/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •His mission wasn't to help you spot statistical malpractice - an actual thing that is an actual problem that you should actually learn to spot. It was to turn you into a nihilist who didn't believe *anything* could be known:
pluralistic.net/2021/01/04/how…
Corporations don't need you to believe that their products are beneficial or even non-harmful. They just need you to believe *nothing*. If you don't know what's true, then why not just do whatever feels good, man? #yolo
3/
Pluralistic: Ad-tech is a bezzle; Google’s unionizing; The Data Detective; Damon Knight’s Why Do Birds is back; Endorsing the Forward 43 slate (04 Jan 2021) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •These bannonfloods of shit are a favored tactic of strongmen and dictators. Their grip on power doesn't depend on their citizens trusting *them* - it's enough that they trust *no one*:
jonathanstray.com/networked-pr…
4/
Defense Against the Dark Arts: Networked Propaganda and Counter-Propaganda
jonathanstray.comCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Bannonflooding is especially beloved of the food industry. Food is essential, monopolized, and incredibly complicated, and many of the most profitable strategies for growing, processing and preparing food are *very* bad for the people who eat that food. Rather than sacrificing profits, the food industry floods the zone with shit, making it impossible to know what's true, in hopes that we will just eat whatever they're serving:
journals.plos.org/plosbiology/…
5/
Sugar industry sponsorship of germ-free rodent studies linking sucrose to hyperlipidemia and cancer: An historical analysis of internal documents
journals.plos.orgCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Now, the "nothing can be known" gambit only works if it's really hard to get at the truth. So it helps that nutrition and diet are very complex subjects, but it helps even more that the nutrition and diet industry are a *cesspool* of quacks and junk science. This is a "scientific discipline" whose prestigious annual meetings are sponsored (and catered) by McDonald's:
motherjones.com/environment/20…
6/
I went to the nutritionists' annual confab. It was catered by McDonald's.
Mother JonesCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •It's a "science" whose most prominent pitchmen peddle quack nostrums and sue the critics who point out (correctly) that eating foods high in chlorophyll will not "oxygenate your blood" (hint, chlorophyll only makes oxygen in the presence of light, which is notably lacking in your colon):
badscience.net/2007/02/ms-gill…
7/
What’s wrong with Dr Gillian McKeith PhD? – Bad Science
www.badscience.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •When the quack-heavy world of nutrition combines with the socially stigmatized world of weight-loss, you get a zone *ripe* for shitflooding. The majority of Americans are "overweight" (according to a definition that relies on the unscientific idea of BMI) and nearly half of Americans are "obese." These numbers have been climbing steadily since the 1970s, and every diet turns out to be basically bullshit:
headgum.com/factually-with-ada…
8/
Factually! with Adam Conover - What Does Ozepmic Actually DO? with Dr. Dhruv Khullar
HeadgumCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Notwithstanding the new blockbuster post-Ozempic drugs, we're been through an unbroken 50-year run of more and more of us being fatter and fatter, *even as* fat stigma increased.
9/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Fat people are treated as weak-willed and fundamentally unhealthy, while the most prominent health-risks of being fat are roundly neglected: the mental health effects of being shamed, and the physical risks of having doctors ignore your health complaints, no matter how serious they sound, and blame them on your weight:
maintenancephase.buzzsprout.co…
10/
“Glorifying Obesity” And Other Myths About Fat People - Maintenance Phase
Buzzsproutenmodo ⚛️ 🧬 🇺🇦
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Cory Doctorow
Unknown parent • • •Fat stigma is real. The mental health risks of fat-shaming are real. Eating disorders are real. Discrimination against fat people is *real*. The fact that these things are *real* doesn't mean that the food industry can't flood the zone with shit, though. On the contrary: the urgency of these issues, combined with the poor regulation of dietitians, makes the "what should you eat" zone *perfect* for flooding with endless quantities of highly profitable shit.
12/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Perhaps you've gotten some of this shit on you. Have you found yourself watching a video from a dietitian influencer like Cara Harbstreet, Colleen Christensen or Lauren Smith, promoting "health at any size" with hashtags like #DerailTheShame and #AntiDiet? These were paid campaigns sponsored by General Mills, Pepsi, and other multinational, multibillion-dollar corporations.
13/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Writing for *The Examination*, Sasha Chavkin, Anjali Tsui, Caitlin Gilbert and Anahad O'Connor describe the way that some of the world's largest and most profitable corporations have hijacked a movement where fat people and their allies fight stigma and shame and used it to peddle the lie that their heavily processed, high-calorie food is good for you:
theexamination.org/articles/as…
14/
As obesity rises, Big Food and dietitians push 'anti-diet' advice
Sasha Chavkin (www.theexamination.org)Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •It's a surreal tale. They describe a speech by Amy Cohn, General Mills’ senior manager for nutrition, to an audience at a dietitian's conference, where Cohn "denounced the media for 'pointing the finger at processed foods' and making consumers feel ashamed of their choices." This is some next-level nihilism: rather than railing against the harmful stigma against fat people, Cohn wants us to fight the stigma against *Cocoa Puffs*.
15/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •This message isn't confined to industry conferences. Dietitians with large Tiktok followings like Cara Harbstreet then carry the message out to the public. In Harbstreet's video promoting Cinnamon Toast Crunch, Cocoa Puffs and Trix, she says, "I will always advocate for fearlessly nourishing meals, including cereal...Because everyone deserves to enjoy food without judgment, especially kids":
tiktok.com/@streetsmart.rd/vid…
16/
TikTok - Make Your Day
www.tiktok.comCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Dietitians, nutritionists and the food industry have always had an uncomfortably close relationship, but the industry's shitflooding kicked into high gear when the FDA proposed rules limiting which foods the industry can promote as "healthy." General Mills, Kelloggs and Post have threatened a First Amendment suit against such a regulation, arguing that they have a free speech right to describe manifestly *unhealthy* food as "healthy."
17/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •The anti-diet movement - again, a legitimate movement aimed at fighting the dangerous junk science behind dieting - has been co-opted by the food industry, who are paying dietitian influencers to say things like "all foods have value" while brandishing packages of Twix and Reese's.
18/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •In their *Examination* article, the authors profile people who struggled with their weight, then, after encountering the food industry's paid disinformation, believed that "healthy at any size" meant that it would be *unhealthy* to avoid highly processed, high calorie food. These people gained large amounts of weight, and found their lives constrained and their health severely compromised.
19/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •I've been overweight all my life. I went to my first Weight Watchers meeting when I was 12. I come from a family of overweight people with the chronic illnesses often associated with being fat. This is a subject that's always on my mind. I even wrote a whole novel about the promise and peril of a weight-loss miracle:
us.macmillan.com/books/9781429…
20/
Book details - Macmillan Publishers
MacmillanCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •I think the anti-diet movement, and its associated ideas like body acceptance and healthy at every size, are enormously positive developments and hugely important. It's *because* I value these ideas that I'm so disgusted with Big Food and its cynical decision to flood the zone with shit. It's also why I'm so furious with dietitians and nutritionists for failing to self-regulate and become a *real* profession, the kind that censures and denounces quacks and shills.
21/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •I have complicated feelings about Ozempic and its successors, but even if these prove to be effective and safe in the long term, and even if we rein in the rapacious pharma companies so that they no longer sell a $5 product for $1000, I would still want dietary science to clean up its act:
jamanetwork.com/journals/jaman…
22/
Estimated Sustainable Cost-Based Prices for Diabetes Medicines
Melissa J. Barber, PhD (JAMA Network)Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •I'm not a nihilist. I think we can use science to discover truths - about ourselves and our world. I want to know those truths, and I think they can be known. The only people who benefit from convincing you that the truth is unknowable are the people who want to lie to you.
23/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •I'm touring my new, nationally bestselling novel *The Bezzle*! Catch me NEXT THURSDAY (Apr 11) in BOSTON with Randall "XKCD" Munroe, then PROVIDENCE, RI (Apr 12) and beyond!
pluralistic.net/2024/02/16/nar…
eof/
Pluralistic: Come see me on tour; How America’s oligarchs lull us the be-your-own-boss fairy tale (16 Feb 2024) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netC.Suthorn
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Nicole Parsons
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •#TranslatedFromTheRepublican
"The Right to Lie" version of the 1st Amendment
"The Right to Commit Fraud" version of the 1st Amendment.
"The Right to Cause Death" version of the 1st Amendment.
"The Right to Buy Supreme Court Justices to Thwart Oversight & Regulations" version of the 1st Amendment.
"The Right to Impose Religious Bigotry on Non-Christians" version of the 1st Amendment.
"The Right to Buy Elections Tax Free" version of the 1st Amendment."
Cory Doctorow reshared this.
myrmepropagandist
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •1. it’s a life long drug not a diet drug
2. it will NOT work for everyone, moreover being fat isn’t always a “problem” that should be solved.
3. ozempic teaches you objectively that weight has very little to do with morality willpower.
myrmepropagandist reshared this.
myrmepropagandist
in reply to myrmepropagandist • • •Being hungry & eating are natural bodily processes. We would never call someone suffering from frequent urination “weak willed” but the emotional-social roles of food complicate eating.
Ozempic slows the rate you digest. Many people who weigh more than they want have efficient, dare I say, “superior” digestion. We get hungry more quickly, stay full for less long. In a paradise of high calorie density foods you get fat. Which is fine except when it’s not.
myrmepropagandist reshared this.
Cory Doctorow
Unknown parent • • •@CptSuperlative I love doing them!
pluralistic.net/2023/12/21/col…
Pluralistic: A year in illustration, 2023 edition (21 Dec 2023) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netTexty the Bard
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Cory Doctorow
Unknown parent • • •Virginicus
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •reshared this
Cory Doctorow e nikol reshared this.
Amber Or Bust
in reply to Virginicus • • •Cory Doctorow
in reply to Amber Or Bust • • •Dr. Kotta 🧶
Unknown parent • • •lgsp is moving
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •You should absolutely check the book by @grantennis, "DarkPR: How Corporate Disinformation Harms Our Health and the Environment"
It is a fully documented and really well-written analysis of the methods used by corporations (3 categories: food, car industry and petrol companies) to poison the debate and distract public opinion from real solutions to the problems they cause.
It's also DRM-free 🙂
darajapress.com/publication/da…
LeBonk
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Steve Bannon | Philosophy Tube
YouTube