Welcome to the 17th Pluralistic linkdump, a collection of all the miscellany that didn't make it into the week's newsletter, cunningly wrought together in a single edition that ranges from the first ISP to AI nonsense to labor organizing victories to the obituary of a brilliant scientist you should know a lot more about! Here's the other 16 dumps:
1/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
pluralistic.net/2024/04/13/gou…
2/
Pluralistic: Twinkfrump Linkdump (13 Apr 2024) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
If you're reading this (and you are!), it was delivered to you by an internet service provider. Today, the ISP industry is calcified, controlled by a handful of telcos and cable companies. But the idea of an "ISP" didn't come out of a giant telecommunications firm - it was created, in living memory, by excellent nerds who are still around.
3/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Depending on how you reckon, The Little Garden was either the first or the second ISP in America. It was named after a Palo Alto Chinese restaurant frequented by its founders. To get a sense of that founding, read these excellent recollections by @tomjennings, whose contributions include the seminal zine *Homocore*, the seminal networking protocol *Fidonet*, and the seminal third-party PC ROM, whence came Dell, Gateway, Compaq, and every other "PC clone" company.
4/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
The first installment describes how an informal co-op to network a few friends turned into a business almost by accident, with thousands of dollars flowing in and out of Jennings' bank account:
sensitiveresearch.com/Archive/…
5/
TLG
www.sensitiveresearch.comCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
And it describes how that ISP set a standard for neutrality, boldly declaring that "TLGnet exercises no control whatsoever over the content of the information." They introduced an idea of radical transparency, documenting their router configurations and other technical details and making them available to the public. They hired unskilled punk and queer kids from their communities and trained them to operate the network equipment they'd invented, customized or improvised.
6/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
In part two, Jennings talks about the evolution of TLG's radical business-plan: to offer *unrestricted* service, encouraging their customers to resell that service to people in their communities, having no lock-in, unbundling extra services including installation charges - the whole anti-enshittification enchilada:
sensitiveresearch.com/Archive/…
7/
The Little Garden
www.sensitiveresearch.comCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
I love Jennings and his work. I even gave him a little cameo in *Picks and Shovels*, the third Martin Hench novel, which will be out next winter. He's as lyrical a writer about technology as you could ask for, and he's also a brilliant engineer and thinker.
8/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
The Little Garden's founders and early power-users have all fleshed out Jennings' account of the birth of ISPs. Writing on his blog, David "DSHR" Rosenthal rounds up other histories from the likes of EFF co-founder John Gilmore and Tim Pozar:
blog.dshr.org/2024/04/the-litt…
9/
The Little Garden
blog.dshr.orgCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Rosenthal describes some of the more exotic shenanigans TLG got up to in order to do end-runs around the Bell system's onerous policies, hacking in the purest sense of the word, for example, by daisy-chaining together modems in regions with free local calling and then making "permanent local calls," with the modems staying online 24/7.
10/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Enshittification came to the ISP business early and hit it hard. The cartel that controls your access to the internet today is a billion light-years away from the principled technologists who invented the industry with an ethos of care, access and fairness. Today's ISPs are bitterly opposed to Net Neutrality, the straightforward proposition that if you request some data, your ISP should send it to you as quickly and reliably as it can.
11/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Instead, ISPs want to offer "slow-lanes" where they will relegate the whole internet, except for those companies that bribe the ISP to be delivered at normal speed. ISPs have a laughably transparent way of describing this: they say that they're allowing services to pay for "fast lanes" with priority access.
12/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
This is the same as the giant grocery store that charges you extra unless you surrender your privacy with a "loyalty card" - and then says that they're offering a "discount" for loyal customers, rather than charging a premium to customers who don't want to be spied on.
13/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
The American business lobby loves this arrangement, and hates Net Neutrality. Having monopolized every sector of our economy, they are extremely fond of "winner take all" dynamics, and that's what a non-neutral ISP delivers: the biggest services with the deepest pockets get the most reliable delivery, which means that smaller services don't just have to be better than the big guys, they also have to be able to outbid them for "priority carriage."
14/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
If everything you get from your ISP is slow and janky, except for the dominant services, then the dominant services can skimp on quality and pocket the difference. That's the goal of every monopolist - not just to be too big to fail, but also too big to care.
Under the Trump administration, FCC chair Ajit Pai dismantled the Net Neutrality rule, colluding with American big business to rig the process.
15/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
They accepted millions of obviously fake anti-Net Neutrality comments (one million identical comments from @pornhub.com addresses, comments from dead people, comments from sitting US Senators who *support* Net Neutrality) and declared open season on American internet users:
ag.ny.gov/press-release/2021/a…
16/
Attorney General James Issues Report Detailing Millions of Fake Comments, Revealing Secret Campaign to Influence FCC’s 2017 Repeal of Net Neutrality Rules
New York State Attorney GeneralCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Now, Biden's FCC is set to reinstate Net Neutrality - but with a "compromise" that makes mobile internet (which nearly all of use sometimes, and the poorest of us are reliant on) a swamp of anticompetitive practices:
cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/202…
Under the proposal, mobile carriers will be able to put traffic to and from apps in the slow lane, and then extort bribes from preferred apps for normal speed and delivery. They'll rely on parts of the 5G standard to pull off this trick.
17/
Harmful 5G Fast Lanes Are Coming. The FCC Needs to Stop Them
cyberlaw.stanford.eduCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
The ISP cartel and the FCC insist that this is fine because *web* traffic won't be degraded, but of course, every service is hellbent on pushing you into using apps instead of the web. That's because the web is an open platform, which means you can install ad- and privacy-blockers. More than half of web users have installed a blocker, making it the largest boycott in human history:
doc.searls.com/2023/11/11/how-…
18/
How is the world’s biggest boycott doing?
Doc Searls WeblogCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
But reverse-engineering and modding an app is a legal minefield. Just removing the encryption from an app can trigger criminal penalties under Section 1201 of the DMCA, carrying a five-year prison sentence and a $500k fine. An app is just a web-page skinned in enough IP that it's a felony to mod it.
19/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Apps are enshittification's vanguard, and the fact that the FCC has found a way to make them *worse* is perversely impressive. They're voting on this on April 25, and they have until April 24 to fix this. They should. They *really* should:
docs.fcc.gov/public/attachment…
ed rule,
In a just world, cheating ripoff ISPs would the top tech policy story. The operational practices of ISPs effect every single one us. We literally can't *talk* about tech policy without ISPs in the middle.
20/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
But Net Neutrality is an also-ran in tech policy discourse, while AI - ugh ugh ugh - is the thing none of us can shut up about.
21/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
This, despite the fact that the most consequential AI applications sum up to serving as a kind of moral crumple-zone for shitty business practices. The point of AI isn't to replace customer service and other low-paid workers who have taken to demanding higher wages and better conditions - it's to fire those workers and replace them with chatbots that *can't* do their jobs.
22/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
An AI salesdroid can't sell your boss a bot that can replace you, but they don't need to. They only have to convince your boss that the bot can do your job, even if it can't.
SF writer @KarlSchroeder is one of the rare sf practitioners who grapples seriously with the future, a "strategic foresight" guy who somehow skirts the bullshit that is the field's hallmark:
pluralistic.net/2024/03/07/the…
23/
Pluralistic: 1900s futurism (07 Mar 2024) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
On his blog, Schroeder describes the AI debates roiling the Association of Professional Futurists, and how it's sucking him into being an unwilling participant in the AI hype cycle:
kschroeder.substack.com/p/drag…
Schroeder's piece is a thoughtful meditation on the relationship of SF's thought-experiments and parables to the promises of AI hucksters, who promise that a) "general artificial intelligence" is just around the corner and that b) it will be worth *trillions* of dollars.
24/
Dragged into the AI hype cycle
Karl Schroeder (Unapocalyptic)Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Schroeder - like other sf writers including Ted Chiang and Charlie Stross (and me) - comes to the conclusion that AI panic isn't about AI, it's about *power*. The artificial life-form devouring the planet and murdering our species is the limited liability corporation, and its substrate isn't silicon, it's *us*, human bodies:
25/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
> What’s lying underneath all our anxieties about AGI is an anxiety that has nothing to do with Artificial Intelligence. Instead, it’s a manifestation of our growing awareness that our world is being stolen from under us. Last year’s estimate put the amount of wealth currently being transferred from the people who made it to an idle billionaire class at $5.2 trillion.
26/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
> Artificial General Intelligence whose environment is the server farms and sweatshops of this class is frightening only because of its capacity to accelerate this greatest of all heists.
After all, the business-case for AI is so *very* thin that the industry can only survive on a torrent of hype and nonsense - like claims that Amazon's "Grab and Go" stores used "AI" to monitor shoppers and automatically bill them for their purchases.
27/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
In reality, the stores used thousands of low-paid Indian workers to monitor cameras and manually charge your card. This happens so often that Indian technologists joke that "AI" stands for "absent Indians":
pluralistic.net/2024/01/29/pay…
Isn't it funny how all the *really* promising AI applications are in domains that most of us aren't qualified to assess?
28/
Pluralistic: I assure you, an AI didn’t write a terrible “George Carlin” routine (29 Jan 2024) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Like the claim that Google's AI produced millions of novel materials that will shortly revolutionize all forms of production, from construction to electronics to medical implants:
deepmind.google/discover/blog/…
That's what Google's press-release claimed,. But when two groups of experts pulled a representative sample of these "new materials" from the Deep Mind database, they found that *none* of these materials qualified as "credible, useful and novel":
pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.c…
29/
Millions of new materials discovered with deep learning
Google DeepMindCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Writing about the researchers' findings for @404mediaco, @jasonkoebler cites Berkeley researchers who concluded that "no new materials have been discovered":
404media.co/google-says-it-dis…
The researchers say that AI data-mining for new materials is promising, but falls well short of Google's claim to be so transformative that it constitutes the "equivalent to nearly 800 years’ worth of knowledge" and "an order-of-magnitude expansion in stable materials known to humanity."
30/
Is Google's AI Actually Discovering 'Millions of New Materials?'
Jason Koebler (404 Media)Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
AI hype keeps the bubble inflating, and for so long as it keeps blowing up, all those investors who've sunk their money into AI can tell themselves that they're rich. This is the essence of "a bezzle": "The magic interval when a confidence trickster knows he has the money he has appropriated but the victim does not yet understand that he has lost it":
pluralistic.net/2023/03/09/aut…
31/
Pluralistic: The AI hype bubble is the new crypto hype bubble (09 Mar 2023) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Among the best debezzlers of AI are the Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy's @randomwalker and @sayashk, who edit the "AI Snake Oil" blog. Now, they've sold a book with the same title:
aisnakeoil.com/p/ai-snake-oil-…
Obviously, books move a lot more slowly than blogs, and so Narayanan and Kapoor say their book will focus on the timeless elements of identifying and understanding AI snake oil:
32/
AI Snake Oil is now available to preorder
Arvind Narayanan (AI Snake Oil)Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
> In the book, we explain the crucial differences between types of AI, why people, companies, and governments are falling for AI snake oil, why AI can’t fix social media, and why we should be far more worried about what people will do with AI than about anything AI will do on its own. While generative AI is what drives press, predictive AI used in criminal justice, finance, healthcare, and other domains remains far more consequential in people’s lives.
33/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
We discuss in depth how predictive AI can go wrong. We also warn of the dangers of a world where AI continues to be controlled by largely unaccountable big tech companies.
The book's out in September and it's up for pre-order now:
bookshop.org/p/books/ai-snake-…
34/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
One of the weirder and worst side-effects of the AI hype bubble is that it has revived the belief that it's somehow possible for giant platforms to monitor all their users' speech and remove "harmful" speech. We've tried this for years, and when humans do it, it always ends with disfavored groups being censored, while dedicated trolls, harassers and monsters evade punishment:
pluralistic.net/2022/08/07/com…
35/
Como Is Infosec – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
AI hype has led policy-makers to believe that we can deputize online services to spy on all their customers and block the bad ones without falling into this trap. Canada is on the verge of adopting Bill C-63, a "harmful content" regulation modeled on examples from the UK and Australia.
Writing on his blog, Canadian lawyer/activist/journalist Dimitri Lascaris describes the dire speech implications for C-63:
dimitrilascaris.org/2024/04/08…
36/
Trudeau's 'online harms' bill threatens free speech - Dimitri Lascaris: Activist Journalist Lawyer
Dimitri Lascaris (Dimitri Lascaris: Activist Journalist Lawyer)Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
It's an excellent legal breakdown of the bill's provisions, but also a excellent analysis of how those provisions are likely to play out in the lives of Canadians, especially those advocating against genocide and taking other positions the that oppose the agenda of the government of the day.
37/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Even if you like the Trudeau government and its policies, these powers will accrue to *every* Canadian government, including the presumptive (and inevitably, totally unhinged) near-future Conservative majority government of Pierre Poilievre.
It's been ten years since Martin Gilens and Benjamin I Page published their paper that concluded that governments make policies that are popular among elites, no matter how *unpopular* they are among the public:
38/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
cambridge.org/core/journals/pe…
Now, this is obviously depressing, but when you see it in action, it's kind of *wild*. The Biden administration has declared war on junk fees, from "resort fees" charged by hotels to the dozens of line-items added to your plane ticket, rental car, or even your rent check. In response, Republican politicians are climbing to their rear haunches and, using their actual human mouths, *defending* junk fees:
prospect.org/politics/2024-04-…
39/
Republicans Are Objectively Pro–Junk Fee
David Dayen (The American Prospect)Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Congressional Republicans are hell-bent on destroying the CFPB's $8 cap on credit-card late-fees. Trump's presumptive running-mate Tim Scott is making this a *campaign plank*: "Vote for me and I will protect your credit-card company's right to screw you on fees!" He boasts about the lobbyists who asked him to take this position: champions of the public interest from the Consumer Bankers Association to the US Chamber of Commerce.
40/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Banks stand to lose $10b/year from this rule (which means Americans stand to *gain* $10b/year from this rule). What's more, Scott's attempt to kill the rule is doomed to fail - there's just no procedural way it will fly. As @ddayen writes, "Not only does this vote put Republicans on the spot over junk fees, it’s a doomed vote, completely initiated by their own possible VP nominee."
41/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
This is an hilarious own-goal, one that only brings attention to a largely ignored - but *extremely good* - aspect of the Biden administration. As Adam Green of Bold Progressives told Dayen, "What’s been missing is opponents smoking themselves out and raising the volume of this fight so the public knows who is on their side."
42/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
The CFPB is a major bright spot in the Biden administration's record. They're doing all kind of innovative things, like making it easy for you to figure out which bank will give you the best deal and then letting you transfer your account and all its associated data, records and payments with a single click:
pluralistic.net/2023/10/21/let…
And now, CFPB chair Rohit Chopra has given a speech laying out the agency's plan to outlaw data-brokers:
consumerfinance.gov/about-us/n…
43/
Prepared Remarks of CFPB Director Rohit Chopra at the White House on Data Protection and National Security | Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Consumer Financial Protection BureauCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Yes, this is some *good news*! There is, in fact, *good news* in the world, bright spots amidst all the misery and terror. One of those bright spots? Labor.
Unions are back, baby. Not only do the vast majority of Americans favor unions, not only are new shops being unionized at rates not seen in generations, but also the largest unions are undergoing revolutions, with control being wrestled away from corrupt union bosses and given to the rank-and-file.
44/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Many of us have heard about the high-profile victories to take back the UAW and Teamsters, but I hadn't heard about the internal struggles at the UFCW, not until I read Hamilton Nolan's gripping account for @inthesetimesmag:
inthesetimes.com/article/revol…
Nolan profiles Faye Guenther, president of UFCW Local 3000 and her successful and effective fight to bring a militant spirit back to the union, which represents a million grocery workers.
45/
Can Grocery Workers Take Back Their Union?
GridworkCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Nolan describes the fight as "every bit as dramatic as any episode of Game of Thrones," and he's not wrong. This is an inspiring tale of working people taking power away from scumbag monopoly bosses and sellout fatcat leaders - and, in so doing, creating a institution that gets better wages, better working conditions, *and* a better economy, by helping to block giant grocery mergers like Kroger/Albertsons.
46/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
I like to end these linkdumps on an up note, so it feels weird to be closing out with an obituary, but I'd argue that any celebration of the long life and many accomplishments of my friend and mentor Anne Innis Dagg *is* an "up note."
I last wrote about Anne in 2020, on the release of a documentary about her work, "The Woman Who Loved Giraffes":
pluralistic.net/2020/02/19/plu…
47/
Pluralist: 19 Feb 2020 – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
As you might have guessed from the title of that doc, Anne was a biologist. She was the first woman scientist to do field-work on giraffes, and that work was so brilliant and fascinating that it kicked off the modern field of giraffology, which remains a woman-dominated specialty thanks to her tireless mentoring and support for the scientists that followed her.
48/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Anne was also the world's most fearsome slayer of junk-science "evolutionary psychology," in which "scientists" invent unfalsifiable just-so stories that prove that some odious human characteristic is actually "natural" because it can be found somewhere in the animal kingdom (i.e., "Darling, *please*, it's not my fault that I'm fucking my grad students, it's the *bonobos*!").
49/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Anne wrote a classic - and sadly out of print - book about this that I absolutely *adore*, not least for having one of the best titles I've ever encountered: *"Love of Shopping" Is Not a Gene*:
memex.craphound.com/2009/11/04…
50/
Love of Shopping is Not a Gene: exposing junk science and ideology in Darwinian Psychology – Cory Doctorow's MEMEX
memex.craphound.comCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Anne was my advisor at the University of Waterloo, an institution that denied her tenure for *fifty years*, despite a brilliant academic career that rivaled that of her storied father, Harold Innis ("the thinking person's Marshall McLuhan"). The fact that Waterloo never recognized Anne is doubly shameful when you consider that she was awarded the Order of Canada:
nationalpost.com/news/canada/q…
51/
National Post
The Canadian Press (National Post)Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Anne lived a *brilliant* live, struggling through adversity, never compromising on her principles, inspiring a vast number of students and colleagues. She lived to ninety one, and died earlier this month. Her ashes will be spread "on the breeding grounds of her beloved giraffes" in South Africa this summer:
obituaries.therecord.com/obitu…
52/
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
I'm touring my new, nationally bestselling novel *The Bezzle*! Catch me in Chicago (Apr 17), Torino (Apr 21) Marin County (Apr 27), Winnipeg (May 2), Calgary (May 3), Vancouver (May 4), and beyond!
pluralistic.net/2024/02/16/nar…
52/
Pluralistic: Come see me on tour; How America’s oligarchs lull us the be-your-own-boss fairy tale (16 Feb 2024) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.netCory Doctorow
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Image:
Valeva1010
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fil…
CC BY-SA 4.0
creativecommons.org/licenses/b…
eof/
File:Hungarian Goulash Recipe.png - Wikimedia Commons
commons.wikimedia.orgDr. Heather Etchevers
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
how do you keep coming up with these perfect aphorisms? The goal of every monopolist is "not just to be too big to fail, but also too big to care."
What a joy to share a timeline with far more eloquent but like-minded people. I appreciate the less eloquent as well, but... thanks. Not for that quote but for all the fish.
Cory Doctorow
in reply to Dr. Heather Etchevers • • •Sensitive content
Lina Khan – FTC Chair on Amazon Antitrust Lawsuit & AI Oversight | The Daily Show
YouTubeDr. Heather Etchevers
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
Kay
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content
@tomjennings
"Enshittification came to the ISP business early and hit it hard. The cartel that controls your access to the internet today is a billion light-years away from the principled technologists who invented the industry with an ethos of care, access and fairness. "
I remember Digex in Greenbelt, Maryland in a similar way. We used to have our regional cypherpunk meetings there. It was professional, but very seat-of-the-pants at the same time.
Cory Doctorow reshared this.
Kay
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •Sensitive content