Salta al contenuto principale


Google will require developer verification for Android apps outside the Play Store


Starting next year, Google will begin to verify the identities of developers distributing their apps on Android devices, not just those who distribute via the Play Store.
in reply to Mas

I'll register an account and share my signing cert for y'all to use. I don't care.
in reply to surewhynotlem

Then they'll ban you for life like they do other people who violate their rules, and they're very good at banning people who try to open new accounts and banning people who have any links to you.
in reply to Mas

If it starts for real, the freedom of Android is lost.

We need to sue them 1000 times and more before they can even start this.

in reply to NuclearDolphin

I don't think it will. It hasn't so far, despite there having been linux phones in the past, and it's got the Windows Phone/Symbian problem where users don't go to it because it lacks support for the apps they use, and developers don't support it because it doesn't have much by way of users.
Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)
in reply to T156

That's why we need to move to it - be the egg that becomes the first chicken.
in reply to T156

Let's hope, gaming on Linux has become so good I un installed windows completely...
in reply to T156

I mean we do have the benefit of Waydroid on most Linux distros, so maybe it'll be a Wine/proton situation where the new OS emulates Android apps in a separate container.
in reply to NuclearDolphin

There are a few key issues with mobile Linux:
1. UIs that have simply not gotten any attention
2. A severe lack of decent hardware
3. Scaled down desktop apps on a phone (seriously who thought this was a good idea)
4. No security whatsoever
5. Basic features missing or requiring a significant degree of tinkering to get working such as audio or calling
in reply to filcuk

There's iOS. It works great, but has no real sideloading. Android works meh, but had proper sideloading. Now Android will no longer have it, so you might as well bite the bullet on the OS with better hardware integration.
in reply to boonhet

I'd argue it doesn't "just work" any longer. I recently left iOS for Android, after 10 years with an iPhone. The keyboard was the first issue, the OS stalling and making the device heat up was another. The lack of actual smarts got a bit annoying, too. You ask Siri something and it goes down a k-hole.

I'll probably end up on a Fairphone without any Google tripe, which is a shame, because I quite like my new OnePlus 13.

in reply to filcuk

Apple is basically the default (at least in the US) so if Android cant offer significantly more theres not much reason to use it
in reply to kittenzrulz123

iPhones are too expensive for some people. Not everyone has $500 lying around.

You can't get an iPhone for $100, an unlocked Motorola phone is only about $100, if you get a carrier locked version its like $30-$40 (and you can carrier unlock them 60 days after activation, just get the cheapest 30 day plan will do, you don't even need 60 days of service to get it unlocked.

Pricing wise, Android phones will still have advantages, even with google's autocratization.

in reply to Mas

Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazg gimbatul, ash nazg thrakatulûk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul

Or, said in the common corporate tongue, “embrace, extend, extinguish”.

in reply to Mas

Man! These guys are literally recreating what made using Symbian a pain to deal with and what sparked its downfall. Even if it was somewhat warranted due to the legitimate malware but atleast you could still run Java and Flash apps with permissions just fine. Now the last reason to run android is basically disappearing and I'm kinda glad I degoogled my latest pixel as of late. But like I also hate that we are moving into an era where you cannot even control what apps are on your mobile device right now. It was already bad enough with the automatic opening of Google Play for sideloaded apps and now its only to get worse from there. Genuinely speaking android when it first came out was a breath of fresh air compared to symbian and iOS. It's kinda a shame that now it's losing what made it great to begin with.
Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)
in reply to Mas

I guess it's time to switch to developing apps for Linux mobile distro

The only reason I like android is cuz I can make my own apks and use them without issue.

in reply to Mas

They're already starting to clamp down on sideloading. I use Aurora Store out of principle, but it's getting more and more common that apps will refuse to launch if not downloaded from the Play Store. I get the risk of sideloading maliciously modified banking apps or whatever, but surely you could just compare a checksum or something?
in reply to Mas

How are they going to enforce this? Is side loading getting some extra signing step only Google can provide?

I shouldn't need to go through Google at all to release an Android app if it's not on their store. This is bullshit

in reply to xthexder

Any device with Google Play services will enforce this. Any device that does not have Google Apps and services will not enforce this.

In this case, China actually has a leg up over the West because they haven't had Google Play services for a long time.

in reply to shortwavesurfer

China is pushing in the same direction. The government want to develop Harmony OS that is gonna have compatibility issues with .apk installs and they could design it in such a way to make VPNs unusable. China is a State Capitalist regime, they will learn all the tricks that the west is using and do their capitalism with an even more stronger grip.

China is not FOSS friendly. Remember how Reddit is keep nagging you to install their app and make an account. Well in China, a lot of their platform/services doesn't even have a desktop client, or even a web browser log-in. You can try visiting some of the mainland Chinese websites yourself. They force you to enter a phone number to sign up and some even require you to scan qr code with their phone app to log in to the website (meaning you're supposed to sign up in their phone app first, PC use is considered "secondary"). Almost everything requires an app on a smartphone.

Edit: P.S. Overseas Chinese Citizens need to download a government spyware app on their phone in order to submit an application to renew passports. I know because my father is a PRC citizen.

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)
in reply to DeathByBigSad

We are looking at nothing less than the death of the internet. Needing to give your ID to access Spotify. Not being able to install software on the device you purchase.
in reply to Mas

This is awful. One of my favorite differences between Android and iOS, as both a user AND developer is sideloading.
in reply to Mihies

How many great apps will we lose because of this, though?
in reply to yeehaw

What's extra funny is that I already did all of this, and yet, I've been informed that my developer account is subject to deletion because I'm not active enough. Since my game does not get regular updates I said F this, let them delete my account. It's still available for sideload on itch.io anyway. Jokes on me for believing that.

So yeah, it seems like Google is actively hostile towards building a library of software/games that just work and intentionally only wants live service garbage apps on their platform because those make more revenue.

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)
in reply to Mihies

Can Nintendo request Google revoke authorization for emulator developers? Or publishers requesting revoking any of the hugely popular manga aggregator apps. Or maybe they'll just outright refuse them from the start, like they will with revanced.
in reply to Integrate777

I'm on your side and you are correct, besides Google amassing a ton of money (each registration costs $25) they will have total control and we know that Google is far beyond "not evil".
in reply to Integrate777

none of those apps would receive authorization in this scenario. you would not be able to use them
Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)
in reply to Mihies

I highly doubt they'll sign Torrent clients.

(Yes I torrent on my phone, cuz why not lol 😛)

in reply to DeathByBigSad

Right sorry. I thought you meant developers won't sign them. Obviously you mean Google.

I hope Google at least will only sign identities, e.g. you really are DeathByBigSad and this is your key which you can sign apps with. Not look at the apps themselves. That may be too much to hope for. 🙁

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)
in reply to DeathByBigSad

Torrent client is just an application, author shouldn't be responsible - naive thinking I suppose
in reply to Mihies

We just need to find a way to fake it, I guess anyone that wants to sideload has to root.
in reply to themachinestops

The only way to fake it would be to use a "public" signature, but then again, I'm sure google will revoke them eventually. I guess rooting won't be enough, one would have to change some internal binaries. Perhaps it's time for a ungooglified android OS 🤷‍♂️
in reply to Emily (she/her)

The closer google gets to apple, the more similar they become. Except apples shit generally all works well together. Knock off air tags, chromecast, audio groups, and so many other things are riddled with bugs and never fixed.

If you make android the same as iOS, I might as well switch.

in reply to yeehaw

Only reason I stick with Apple is because their stuff simply works and is supported (in most cases) for almost 10 years.
Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)
in reply to Mas

Hasn’t Apple been losing in court across the world for doing exactly this?
in reply to ayyy

No, it's nothing like what Apple's been doing.

Apple has been losing in court about everyone needs to give them money anytime anything makes any money on iOS, or even thinking absolutely allowing others to install anything beyond their App Store.

This is Google demanding every app that can be installed on Android must be signed by them, and the only cost is registering with them your name and address, possibly verified by government ID. (And quite possible doxxing you at the same time as they already do on the Play Store....)

These are very different, and unlike Apple, will more likely be applauded by numerous world governments in the current "anything a child can even remotely even know about" must have its users be checked to make sure they are "allowed to".

in reply to Mas

Why am I using an Android device then? Also how would this even work with open source apps that people build from source?
in reply to Pycorax

You build an app from source, I assume you'll get a prompt on your phone that says it can't run because it's not signed.
in reply to yeehaw

Another article did mention that it's only for devices with Play Protect enabled so if they keep that as easy as it is to disable right now, it'll be a non issue actually.
in reply to boonhet

I could see them making it a developer option, then force you to agree to giving up your warranty if you wanna turn on sideloading, and maybe even trigger a play intergrity thing that makes banking apps unusable.
in reply to yeehaw

Another article did mention that it's only for devices with Play Protect enabled so if they keep that as easy as it is to disable right now, it'll be a non issue actually.
in reply to Mas

It really is past time we saw serious work on a mobile flavor of Linux. Not AOSP, not anything whatsoever downstream of Google, but a regular Linux distro with a mobile friendly DTE.
in reply to FryHyde

Oh, I thought the project was dead. Apparently after Canonical dropped it, it was picked up by the community. Thanks, I’ll look into it. It might even be worth supporting.
in reply to plyth

Sadly, it only runs on genuinely ancient smart phones. I can't even re-purpose my old pre-loved phones that I've kept after upgrading, because most of them are still too new for postmarketos
in reply to Ada

Woah, what's a red username mean on Voyager? Are you an administrator?
in reply to Mas

If I understood correctly they use DMA as an additional justification. Thank you, EU parlament.
in reply to Mas

and just like that google expands their walled garden and becomes apple 2

remember when the internet was an open platform and computers were yours to run programs you wanted?

in reply to Eager Eagle

It’s about to get even worse. With AI and deepfakes, including deepfake porn, it will become impossible to argue against the complete and total tracking of all access to compute for the general population. There will be literally no justifiable reason to “control your own computer”, when children could get hurt.
Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)
in reply to Eager Eagle

We had it coming.. I do let my thoughts Go, that you Someehen need to identify yourself to even connect to the internet.

They didn't apply laws to regulate some stuff, so now they start hammering down to enforce Control.

And big tech and companies will absolutely be one of the hardest Driver for this. There are Potential new ways to make Money. Basically a wet dream for especially big tech.

in reply to ratzki

It won't apply to GrapheneOS. It only applies to certified OSes and GrapheneOS is not certified because it doesn't license Google Mobile Services.
in reply to ratzki

just last month there was news about some changes in Android that will make it harder for alternative distributions..... go figure
in reply to Mas

In short, they make independent stores impossible?
in reply to MonkderVierte

Mostly; they just force themselves into the process for publishing each app and have an effective veto on apps. So yeah, no stores fully independent of Google.
in reply to festus

... Didn't the EU JUST fine Apple half a billion euros over the same thing?
in reply to Mas

So I guess my next phone will be a Chinese phone. Even if it spies on me, I'll have the freedom to install whatever I want from anywhere.

The Chinese have a golden window of opportunity. Let's hope they don't mess this up.

in reply to Mas

Damn, it feels like someone is treating a 1984 novel like an instruction...
in reply to Mas

will I be able to install the Google Play store on graphino S
in reply to nutsack

Right now? Yeah, its very easy to do, and there's a download link for it included in GrapheneOS's preinstalled app-store.

I am however worried that eventually Google will make running custom software (apks, alternate firmwares) so difficult that development for those will stop long term.

in reply to Mas

Let Google know what you think about this: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAI…
in reply to xcjs

Who organized this form? Is there something official to make it look like it's not just signing me up for spam?
in reply to chaospatterns

A valid question.

It's the official survey form from the Android Developer page on the matter: developer.android.com/develope…

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)
in reply to Mas

Will, what's the point now? Fuck it get an Apple. Why not.

EDIT This is going to be the future for us. Stop sideloading apps, then lock the bootloader.

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)
in reply to Mas

Guess I'm going back to a dumbphone next time because I'm NOT letting Google see what I'm downloading, I'd rather carry a laptop all day.
in reply to IngeniousRocks (They/She)

There are alternatives to Google and Apple products. I recommend the MNT Pocket Reform if you'd like a full keyboard, or a Librem 5 if you prefer a more typical smartphone form factor.
Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)
in reply to IngeniousRocks (They/She)

GrapheneOS works likea champ on my used Pixel 7 Pro, it was less than 100USD about 6m ago
in reply to Mas

goddamnit I JUST bought a new Fairphone 5 and opted not to go for e/os variant, because I was worried of incompatibility issues.

Guess I'll have to learn how to replace my phone OS in 2026...

in reply to Mas

I sent Apple to hell because of dumb "you can't change UI to your liking", guess Google is next

*yes, this was seen miles away. I work with a laptop most of the time, so phone doesn't matter much for me, apart of a box that rings a few times a year

**Yes, both companies are run by greedy dumbfucks. I am getting tired and angry that finding companies that are different takes actual dedication. It should not be this way