/e/ OS does a little trolling and sends all your Text to Voice data to OpenAI for processing and Speech generation.
First of all, to anyone downvoting my Comments about /e/ being a piece of shit, because...
- they advertise themselves as degoogled, but instead let you connect to Google/Microsoft/etc services
- replace all the propriatery not at all Secure Services from Google, with.... Drumroll please.... Propriatery and not at all Secure Services from themselves and actively encourage it.
- They are For-profit
- and being MORE out of date then even Fairphones stock roms.
... I told you so. Dm your Instance admin, pay them to send the DB entries of your Downvotes on a Thumb drive (or anything else from SSD to 3.5 inchHDD, depending on your preferences), and shove it up your rectum.
But a TL;DR:
/E/ is not Private. They just switch one bad comany to another one.
Voice to Text feature using Open AI
reality — an open, secure, de-Googled system is not open, not secure, and not a de-Googled system!? This is just a new anøm disguised as open source./e/OS community
Questa voce è stata modificata (1 settimana fa)
like this
codenul
in reply to Luffy • • •Man, i really want to like Murena as I have been using e/os for about 3 years now. Even signed up and pay a yearly subsriction for their online ecosystem, albeit its more expensive, but i wanted to give my money to the underdog in this instance.
Going have to read more into this since last years failure doesnt help their image
like this
TVA e Maeve like this.
Ŝan
in reply to Luffy • • •Honestly, what's wrong wiþ þis? You'd raþer þey restrict a user's desire to do someþing? You want less choice?
Are þey forcing users to connect? Are þey connecting wiþout user's consent?
Þis is a legitimate complaint. Not all /e/ software is OSS, and you can't trust sourcecode you can't audit.
Þis is a silly þing to object to; you're posting to !privacy, not !communism. Noþing about privacy implies communism, or even þe "F" in FOSS.
birdwing
in reply to Ŝan • • •It is wrong, because if you have the "choice" to, they almost certainly will be put up as a preset. And it enables your privacy to be compromised. Think of it like this: instead of having less choice by not having an option to connect to Microsoft/Google/etc., you get more liberty, privacy, and that gives you more choice to say what you want. Remember the Github dev who got blocked by Microsoft for his criticism?
Exactly. It can happen to you too. And that's not something that will just happen to high profile people, but everyone, unless if we stand against it.
For-profit is not a silly thing to object to. When the software has profit as motive, they gain an incentive to still snoop on data and sell it.
And that is exactly why privacy is necessary for all. Oligarchs love privacy (except for others), so they can hide their tax avoidance, and steal people's hard work.
All who are not oligarchs, be they communist/socialist, christian democrat, liberal, or whatever else, would stand to benefit from privacy. And it is precisely for that reason that you calling out it as communist makes no sense.
thanksforallthefish
in reply to birdwing • • •It's funny, I do remember the story, but I can't find it across multiple search engines (obviously Bing are going to block it so DDG can't find it, but I also tried startpage, searx, ecosia as well)
Can you point me to any links or give me a few more search terms to help finding it ?
pirat
in reply to thanksforallthefish • • •How GitHub, Inc. abruptly banned my account, including all my repositories, without any notice
Nikolay (Medium)thanksforallthefish
in reply to pirat • • •Good find although not the article I was thinking OP was referring to. It was more recent, within the last 12 months I think.
My best recollection was that the person had a hotmail or outlook account which was suddenly terminated following criticism of microsoft (possibly their failure to address a security issue). That account was their login/access path to a high profile foss tool. I don't think the tool itself got taken down in this case.
Not sure how accurate the above is, it's my vague recollection.
Blisterexe
in reply to thanksforallthefish • • •Ŝan
in reply to birdwing • • •Þis sounds suspiciously like "you're too stupid to make decisions yourself." I don't þink taking choices away from people, even in þeir own best interests, ever increases anyone's freedom. It sounds like an argument of dictators.
muix
in reply to Ŝan • • •Gamma
in reply to muix • • •I þink þe point is þat þ makes a th sound, so þey just did a simple replacement of þe characters
It does look like þere’s a few capitals þough, so þat’s pretty cool!
If Only
in reply to muix • • •Ŝan
in reply to muix • • •muix
in reply to Ŝan • • •lad
in reply to muix • • •Better replace U with V, to dovble the confvsion
oscardejarjayes [comrade/them]
in reply to Ŝan • • •Being a non-profit instead of a For-profit isn't really about communism either. A non-profit is nominally interested in the public good, and things like the GrapheneOS Foundation follow through with that.
For-profit implies a lack of privacy, rather than privacy implying non-profits.
Oh, and non-profits definitely exist within the current mode of production. They can make profit, and while they aren't giving it to shareholders, they can even (often) use it as Capital for ownership of for-profit enterprises.
Danitos
in reply to oscardejarjayes [comrade/them] • • •Care to expand on how is this always the case?
oscardejarjayes [comrade/them]
in reply to Danitos • • •Privacy isn't particularly profitable. Convenience is a way bigger market than privacy, and data is valuable. So, if you're primary motive is profit, and especially if you have a fiduciary responsibility, it's in your best interest not to respect the privacy of your users.
That's not to say all for-profit companies are anti-privacy, or even on the same level, but it's a mark against you.
Danitos
in reply to oscardejarjayes [comrade/them] • • •davel
in reply to Ŝan • • •We know. Just downvote and move on.
s38b35M5
in reply to Luffy • • •Watching from the sidelines as a LOS ROM user, I'm disappointed by the replies from the devs. From mischaracterizing surprise, anger and generally negative feedback as positive praise to completely ignoring the two main asks of the community. For me, there are other red flags, but I'll leave it alone.
Ego seems to be coming into play here, and the repeated references to GrapheneOS seem to reinforce that. Handwaving new and unique criticism as if it is a continuation of an older conflict is pretty poor form.
The basic issue as I see it (as a non-user of their platform) is to market your OS the way they do while also adding this feature without notice or explanation. Their claim that they want to stay relevant and include popular features is a straw man. There are other ways to implement it, and other ways to introduce it to the community. But that's not relevant. Their explanation could be used to justify abandoning their stated objective of anti-big tech in any/all ways. Saying people want big corporate tech features is weak and obviously not in parity with the stated mission of privacy-first.
It's not always the poor choices that sink user trust; sometimes it's a tone deaf response or unexplained motives, or opaque financial incentive structure.
Sometimes it's all of the above. This seems to be one of those cases.
Ty @Luffy879 for sharing.
E: spelling
JamesBoeing737MAX
in reply to s38b35M5 • • •ZeDoTelhado
in reply to Luffy • • •Do not threaten them with a good time
DrDystopia
in reply to ZeDoTelhado • • •upstroke4448
in reply to Luffy • • •Luffy
in reply to upstroke4448 • • •Privacy is the Main point spoken of in both the websites.
And don't come up with some „but privacy means big tech and OpenAI isn't big tech” bullcrap.
The word comes up 3 times in /e/, and the whole paragraph in Calyx is all about being spied on by big entities
krolden
in reply to Luffy • • •?
Luffy
in reply to krolden • • •Ilandar
in reply to Luffy • • •...?
What are we supposed to be looking at here?
krolden
in reply to Luffy • • •JamesBoeing737MAX
in reply to upstroke4448 • • •like this
HeerlijkeDrop likes this.
ScoffingLizard
in reply to Luffy • • •rumba
in reply to ScoffingLizard • • •Usually, it's frameworks using JavaScript to render. Instead of the whole page coming down statically, they make a couple of database calls and render on templates.
It gives them a lot of options for dynamic content. But it really fucks up accessibility and security.
sunzu2
in reply to Luffy • • •GrapheneOS is fucking king a for a reason. The main dev was a cunt but he wasn't wrong.
Peoples need to learn to see through PR, good or bad, and focus on specs.
It seems after years of bullshit PR, we can safely say that GrapheneOS thesis stood the test of time.
Google took notice and now fighting us.
JamesBoeing737MAX
in reply to sunzu2 • • •like this
sunzu2 likes this.
bitwolf
in reply to JamesBoeing737MAX • • •like this
sunzu2 likes this.
sunzu2
in reply to bitwolf • • •Luis Rossman got into with the main dev... At the time it seemed like Luis was right
However due what happened recently with calyx guy and how him and Luis have business connection.
I am reconsidering what actually happened back then.
GOS dev is socially inept but he was right from technical perspective and looks like he was bullied. So the lashing out might have been justified.
But like I said, maybe it it is time for us to look at substance over form. Shiti PR has been weaponized against peasant class.
Elites will literally tell you what you want to hear on tv while robbing you and the normies larp that propaganda as if they came up within.
With that being futo makes good product too
But graphene is clearly superior to CalyxOS
NotSteve_
in reply to sunzu2 • • •like this
sunzu2 likes this.
sunzu2
in reply to NotSteve_ • • •No tldr... I am just going off my memory as a shit poster
But to address your core request.
The degoogle privacy community has a running arguement regarding what's the best way to degoogle for privacy
Currently there are two options microg which spoofs GPS but still does some connections ie calyxOs approach among other RPMs
OR
Sandboxed GPS ie GrapheneOS approach. Where you just run the apps but gos limits what gps can track. You do need a Google account but it is easy to get a dummy.
As side note the best is gos with NO sandboxed gps but realistically normies joining the movement need GPS capabilities.
Either one is better than normie phone but if you care about privacy AND security, gos is king.
The improvements they made to android even gets upstreamed by Google creeps.
CalyxOS development is spotty. Obviously I support them two, extra options are good and they cover more phones.
Gos only does pixel, which is problematic but that's just what can be done currently.
NotSteve_
in reply to sunzu2 • • •like this
sunzu2 likes this.
sunzu2
in reply to NotSteve_ • • •LineageOS covers a lot of devices but I can NOT recommend in good faith as a personal phone decide.
It is made in some weird development mode and can't lock the bootloader.
Both of these make very insecure if you lose physical control. It is a decent degoogle.
Sammy is going anti ROM and will prevent people from unlocking Bootloader going forward it seems.
On personal level, I would advise against focusing on hard ware. I used to be a hardware whore myself. But in 2025 privacy/security should be the defining factor in cell phone decision. I can't think of anything more personal.
alkaliv2
in reply to sunzu2 • • •This is the BEST write up I have ever seen on the topic. Had no idea it was out there and explained a lot about the inner workings for security I wasn't expecting.
reddit.com/r/LineageOS/comment…
PortNull
in reply to sunzu2 • • •sunzu2 likes this.
sunzu2
in reply to PortNull • • •This used to work for me but then they started forcing the play store too and account which then required an account. So I just stopped using GPS all together.
But thank you for pointing just goes to show experience can be different and people should play around for their set up.
For me now it is an ideological battle. Fuck Google
JamesBoeing737MAX
in reply to bitwolf • • •sunzu2
in reply to JamesBoeing737MAX • • •Rossman has joint financial interest with calyx guy who is now leaving calyx.
There is more to that story IMHO
Luffy
in reply to sunzu2 • • •I just dived into that rabbit hole, heres what I could understand until now:
Tbh, I just dont get ROMs, just because you cant beat Graphene dosent mean that everyone needs the kind of Security Graphene gives you. Just dont fuck up, no matter how hard it apparently is.
like this
sunzu2 likes this.
Ilandar
in reply to Luffy • • •sunzu2
in reply to Ilandar • • •JamesBoeing737MAX
in reply to sunzu2 • • •sunzu2 likes this.
sunzu2
in reply to JamesBoeing737MAX • • •Ilandar
in reply to bitwolf • • •There was no bullying, this is a complete fabrication on the part of Daniel Micay (founder of GrapheneOS). Rossmann made several positive videos about GrapheneOS and encouraged his viewers to use it themselves. He later made where he explained why he was no longer comfortable using it after Micay went on an insanely unhinged Discord DMs rant accusing Rossmann of "attacking and abusing me and the project" after Rossman left a single comment on a Techlore video. What was this incredibly abusive and inflammatory comment?
"This is informative, and unfortunate."
Rossmann said he no longer felt comfortable having GrapheneOS on his phone, considering Micay was the one developing it and now clearly held a grudge. I think that's pretty reasonable and logical, but apparently it was so triggering for the GrapheneOS shills that to this day they continue to push these entirely fake narratives about Rossmann being a "bully" and an "abuser". All the DMs are in the video I linked, you can decide for yourself whether Micay is an unhinged lunatic or the Second Coming of Christ.
- YouTube
www.youtube.commathemachristian [he/him]
in reply to Luffy • • •Matt
in reply to Luffy • • •ragas
in reply to Luffy • • •What the fuck are you talking about? You can find the source codr of the e/os apps here:
gitlab.e.foundation/e/os/
There is nothing proprietary about them.
os · GitLab
GitLabLuffy
in reply to ragas • • •I am talking about their backup services and such.
Afaik, their Photos and file Backup Servers are neither Open Source nor encrypted in any way
AnUnusualRelic
in reply to ragas • • •AnUnusualRelic
in reply to Luffy • • •Luffy
in reply to AnUnusualRelic • • •AnUnusualRelic
in reply to Luffy • • •OboTheHobo
in reply to Luffy • • •Ok, the openAI thing is not great. However...
What the fuck are you talking about? Degoogled doesn't mean you shouldn't be allowed to connect to Google services. It just mean that it doesn't require Google services to function and that the default configuration shouldn't include any Google services. If the end user actively wants to use google/microsoft/etc services then they should be able to. It seems as though you are advocating for an open source operating system to lock itself down from allowing the end user to use certain features, which is against the FOSS ethos. Remember, "free" as in "freedom."
BlameTheAntifa
in reply to Luffy • • •Vegafjord eo
in reply to Luffy • • •Vegafjord eo
in reply to Vegafjord eo • • •infjarchninja
in reply to Luffy • • •I am a right muppet. I recommended e/OS a few days ago.
heres me old 12 year old Samsung S4.
Its got the e/OS, recovery-e-2.2-r-20240719418592-dev-jfltexx running with android 11
Those were that days. 16gb with 2gb ram, a fucking powerhouse, and more importantly, no fucking ai shit
I should say its my kitchen timer.
No more udates.
Working like a charm, battery last a week.
looks like I wont be using anymore of e/OS roms.
Half my family have e/OS installed.
I will be busy removing e/OS, and that ai shit with it, over the next few days.
blackfire
in reply to Luffy • • •utopiah
in reply to Luffy • • •This is a FUD post. Honestly this is just doing a disservice to privacy in general.
Of course /e/OS is not perfect but the title is wrong (/e/OS didn't suddenly start sending data to OpenAI without user permission, they are relying on OpenAI for a service that is optional PLUS they are explicitly saying that they setup a proxy to anonymize content!) but the content is also wrong :
TL;DR: /e/OS is not perfect but it's damn well better than Google!
Also important clarification, the Murena services (backup, STT highlighted there, etc) are NOT MANDATORY! When you boot you can decide to use them, make an account, etc (yes, like other services, including Google) but you just as well refuse and use your device. There is NO account required. The goal is to help people who are not yet self-hosting everything have an alternative rather than... have nothing then give up and fallback to iOS or Googled Android.
os · GitLab
GitLabLuffy
in reply to utopiah • • •Let me stop you here.
Every phone /e/ supports, Lineage or calyx supports too. Lineage and Calyx are both non profit, implement an actually secure Backup system by default, and do not try to sell you a subscription.
So why should I be defending a company that's worse then the Alternative, that's obligated to extract the most possible profit from its costumers, that says it is Private, yet sends your backup and Photos unencrypted to murena servers?
And no, you can't jUsT uSe aNoThEr bAcKuP sErViCe. These require root access by default, so you can't just install Seedvault.
Also, I don't give a fuck if the data to OpenAI is proxied or not. OpenAI is still not Private, and Murena has other, on device, Open source Voice to text options. Yet they, the self proclaimed Private OS, rely on a non private service
utopiah
in reply to Luffy • • •You'd have benefited from not stopping there, at least reading the bold parts : nobody has to use Murena servers. You turn on the device, say no, use whatever alternative services you want, that's it. What Murena (not /e/OS) offers is buying a phone with a working deGoogled Android device. There is a market for that. You don't have to buy from them and it's enough. You can criticize it as much as you want, here and elsewhere, and honestly your criticism is welcomed so that they can improve, just don't make things up.
Source : I'm backing up my photos locally with Immich, no Murena account, no Murena services.
Edit: thanks for sharing github.com/seedvault-app/seedv… looks interesting.
GitHub - seedvault-app/seedvault: A backup application for the Android Open Source Project.
GitHubLuffy
in reply to utopiah • • •Im just saying, that Murena, with their current services, is in no way better than Google. Also, that can change at any time, since the one making the Services and the one making the OS is the same Murena, so theres nothing stopping them to vertically integrate their Services more and more, until it becomes the only real option
just like Google and Apple did it.
Google started as a company that gave extraordinary Services for cheap to people, and only once it got popular, they started selling user data and doing questionable shit as result of them not really caring about Data Security and storing data unencrypted on their Servers.
Murena is a company that is giving extraordinary Services for sometimes Cheaper than the non Privacy friendly option, and once it gets popular, they still will be reserving the right to start selling user data and do Questionable shit as a result of them not caring about Data Security and storing data unencrypted on their Servers.
Yes, they did not sell your data. Yet. They did not release your Data to authorities. Yet. Their Service, being unencrypted, baked deep into the OS (with their Backup) shows just how much they could go that route at any time, and by having a mostly noobie audience, they wont get much shit for it probably
For me, its just like the Mastodon vs. Bluesky thing
Yes, /e/ is currently better than Google, but /e/ can turn as bad as Google any time. Unlike something like Proton or other Backup systems, since they have the option to encrypt your Photos and therefore make them Availible only to the user.
utopiah
in reply to Luffy • • •Honestly you seem to understand the technical side of things but I don't think you fully grasp the economical scale of Google. Murena is literally nobody, like 10 guys in a small shop in Paris, the CEO walking around, few extra staff international, some contributions here and there, it's not symbolic and I don't want to diminish their effort but it's really tiny. Your local supermarket probably has more staff than they do!
Meanwhile... Alphabet who owns Google is nearly ~200k people on payrolls, thousands more outsourced via 3rd party services (e.g. data annotation, social network "cleaning", etc) and the 4th largest corporation in market capital.
Honestly the comparison is not even apple versus orange.
Same for Apple, 3rd market cap, ~150k employees.
Yet... maybe more importantly, Murena has 0 lock-in, none. Meanwhile Apple and Google literally own the mobile market. It's practically impossible to buy a phone without at some point using one of these 2.
So finding imperfections in /e/OS and Murena is fine, again hopefully helping them to grow out of those potential problems, but the comparison ... I don't even know why do it in the first place. Murena literally can not become Google.
Count042
in reply to utopiah • • •Google and Apple were once the 10 employee nobodies going against behemoths.
Google also used to have no lock in, as well. It's original selling point was an open ecosystem with no lock in, unlike Apple.
You're like a walking definition of 'those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it'
utopiah
in reply to Count042 • • •Check my post history, I often link to Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy by Carl Shapiro and Hal R. Varian that precisely has chapters on lock-in. If you are not aware who Hal Varian is he was Chief Economist at Google. I don't know how much you think you know about "history" but I'm sure you do not know what I did study or not on the topic.
PS: if one day Murena becomes the size of Google or Apple according to pretty much any metric, I'll buy you a bottle of Champagne and kiss your feet to apologize of my naivety. You can archive that post.
Count042
in reply to utopiah • • •Nothing you wrote was a response to what I wrote.
I also don't care what you 'studied'. I lived it. Google and Apple were literally, and this is a quantifiable fact and not an opinion as you seem to be treating it in your response, the 10 person startups that were going against industry behemoths.
Yahoo was, at the time, was a Juggernaut.
I.B.M., at the time, was a Juggernaut.
Luffy
in reply to utopiah • • •Google was just a comparison. Of course Murena will not become as strong globally, but if we look at it relatively to the Costum ROM community, they have quite a fair share already.
Don't take everything literally. I just said, that having the track record that /e/ has regarding actual Privacy and not relying on big tech, which dosent take much effort since they literally fork LinaegeOS, which already dosent rely on big tech, I don't think its a good idea to let them become any stronger than they need to be, since, like I just pointed out
Murena does not do any substancial Development of Costum Roms. They just take Linaege, remove all the Open source software like Seedvault, and instead implement their own security nightmares.
And no, tracker blocking is not a good reason to make your own Costum Rom. There are literal free apps on Fdroid which do it already, and better. Don't like it? Switch to the DNS server of adguard, they do that too. Or mullvad. Or whatever.
Murena as a company is literally a leech just like Iode, which Attach themselves to Linaege (which dosent say they are Private at all), add a fucking DNS blocker, call it a day, and act like they just made Linaege Private.
utopiah
in reply to Luffy • • •Murena or Iode aren't about development or customization, it's about being able to actually buy a phone and use it without Google services, no tinkering. You might not be the audience, you might have other criteria for what constitute privacy, but basically if you can AND want to install a custom ROM, you are not their market.
None of the actors you mentioned, e.g. LineageOS, AdGuard, MullVad, SeedVault, and all the other "OS" in the name, etc do that so it's not relevant. I'm not saying they are not important but it's a different product entirely.
Luffy
in reply to utopiah • • •There are 3rd Party stores for Those too.
Its just not plastered on the Main page of the project
But I wouldnt argue that if you already want a degoogled phone, you have researched enough to at least know where to Ask for such websites
MotoAsh
in reply to utopiah • • •There is ample validity to complaining about pushing for profit services, though. Just like we all hate MS for pushing an online account for Windows, we shouldn't be blanket accepting someone pushing a service here either.
Making it truly optional is great, but it's still promotion.
Autonomous User
in reply to utopiah • • •Say less. You do not fight efficiently.
Libre software. 'Open source' is a deliberately ambiguous phrase, engineered to derail libre software.
Selling libre software is good. Stay on target.
lemmy.world/post/35312231
Autonomous User
2025-09-01 20:35:34
marcie (she/her)
in reply to Luffy • • •like this
sunzu2 likes this.
Luffy
in reply to marcie (she/her) • • •Linaege and Calyx is OK too, since they actually develope software (Linaege does it from scratch, Calyx develops Seedvault etc). even though they are not as rigid as Graphene, they are still ok for normal ungoogled stuff, and to be honest, most people dont need the security Graphene provides them with.
My problem is with Roms like /E/ OS or Iode, which essentially add nothing of value, but instead Fork Linaege, remove Seedvault and everything what isn't essential, and sell what is essentially a DNS blocker (which you can just use on your VPN slot via apps like DNSnet, or Server side like Adguard or Mullvad DNS) as a new ROM, complete with Subscription Service and (in the case of E OS) even with non encrypted Backup, essentially begging someone to compromise their Servers and steal peoples Photos and Data.
marcie (she/her)
in reply to Luffy • • •Luffy
in reply to marcie (she/her) • • •like this
sunzu2 likes this.
rapchee
in reply to marcie (she/her) • • •WorldsDumbestMan
in reply to marcie (she/her) • • •marcie (she/her)
in reply to WorldsDumbestMan • • •Pretty ridiculous take I can wire sniff everything coming out of my house and Linux (I use fedora Atomic) and GrapheneOs solve any sort of tracking issues. Then you just have only your ISP to worry about, and that can be solved with appropriate vpn, vps, and/or tor setups
Edit oh you're a bit account
Autonomous User
in reply to marcie (she/her) • • •You're letting them troll you. It's far more simple. See part 4: lemmy.world/post/35312231
Autonomous User
2025-09-01 20:35:34
Autonomous User
in reply to WorldsDumbestMan • • •Blatant lie, classic disinformation, who told you to read it alone?
When it bans us forking it, we do not control it, guaranteed. lmao
WorldsDumbestMan
in reply to Autonomous User • • •CitricBase
in reply to marcie (she/her) • • •Tehdastehdas
in reply to CitricBase • • •lemmy.world/post/27344091
CitricBase
in reply to Tehdastehdas • • •Tehdastehdas
in reply to CitricBase • • •Skorp
in reply to Tehdastehdas • • •CitricBase
in reply to Skorp • • •How do you expect me, or anyone else, to provide you with the inner working details of Google's surreptitiously closed-as-fuck custom SoCs? That's the entire basis of the problem, it's closed-as-fuck and there is nothing that you or I or anyone else can do to verify that it isn't malicious.
At this point, you have to choose whether or not to trust the manufacturer. Given that the manufacturer is the most notoriously data-hungry surveillance corporation in the history of the entire world, I choose not to trust them. I wouldn't trust them, even if they were to claim not to spy on us with these phones. (Incidentally, that is not something they claim.)
Skorp
in reply to CitricBase • • •Open source or source availability is not a requirement for auditing a system. There would be evidence that would have almost certainly been found by now if this was the case. It is up to you, or the claimant, to prove their claims. I can say that there has not been any evidence of data collection by hardware components found, despite years of Pixel devices being tested by security researchers and mobile forensics companies. Not only that, the actual technical capabilities of the hardware (isolated component without networking capabilities) backs that up.
What do you have except fearmongering?
xttweaponttx
in reply to CitricBase • • •Skorp
in reply to xttweaponttx • • •krolden
in reply to CitricBase • • •WorldsDumbestMan
in reply to Luffy • • •MangoPenguin
in reply to Luffy • • •int32
in reply to MangoPenguin • • •MangoPenguin
in reply to int32 • • •int32
in reply to MangoPenguin • • •MangoPenguin
in reply to int32 • • •I'm confused now, I thought we were talking about the bit here "let you connect to Google/Microsoft/etc services"
But either way, you can also install another app that does let you connect to local AI if you want to use that kind of thing.
int32
in reply to MangoPenguin • • •Matt
in reply to Luffy • • •int32
in reply to Matt • • •like this
sunzu2 likes this.
Matt
in reply to int32 • • •Home
GitHubint32
in reply to Matt • • •I think I'll just use lineage, or install a real linux on it.
xttweaponttx
in reply to int32 • • •Real Linux is definitely the way - but GSI Roms are totally capable of microG if I'm not mistaken! On that github's FAQ page it mentions the FLOSS version comes packed with f-droid; microG can be installed from there and works fine - it doesnt need to be bundled in the ROM! 🙂
Or just stick with the vanilla gsi & you've got bare aosp. Throw F-droid on there, pull down microG and bam!
jsomae
in reply to Luffy • • •Reminder that FOSS is compatible with commercial licenses.
That is not to say /e/ is FOSS. But given the reality of the capitalist hellscape we live in, we should not shame developers (FOSS or not) for not opting to work for free.
Luffy
in reply to jsomae • • •Non profit dosent mean everyone who works there cant earn money.
It just means, that you as Shareholder cant just sit on your ass and collect the revenue from your company.
If you own a non profit, and you work as for example a Dev or the head of PR, you can still have a hefty 30$/hour salary.
And the other way around, having a For profit just tells me that you do so little, that you can't even justify employing yourself at a non profit and giving you an own salary that way, because a non profit has to disclose just how much money you give yourself while underpaying your workers
like this
sunzu2 likes this.
sunzu2
in reply to Luffy • • •30$/hr
In 2025 america ain't really money for somebody with a skill set to do this type of work in the US at least.
Otherwise agree. But realistically Foss will need to outcompete corpos commercially and that requires normies to make these consumption choice while Foss gains mass market appeal.
Obviously fedi is pro FOSS but we are just a rounding error as of now.
CaptPretentious
in reply to Luffy • • •Blisterexe
in reply to CaptPretentious • • •