Edit: As mentioned below, it appears to be a bug, not intentional!
Threads hiding @pixelfed mentions, not a good look Meta 🙄
Questa voce è stata modificata (10 mesi fa)
reshared this
⇧
Edit: As mentioned below, it appears to be a bug, not intentional!
Threads hiding @pixelfed mentions, not a good look Meta 🙄
reshared this
Daniel Supernault
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •Meta is free to do whatever they want on their platforms, and I hope this is a bug.
I hope the fediverse remembers this though! (They have done this on FB and IG to us before)
Oblomov reshared this.
Shlee fucked around and
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •Bart Louwers
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •Tormod Halvorsen
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •I might be misremembering, but the previous official statements from Meta on Threads integration was that it would start as a one-way push. Meaning that Mastodon clients could follow a Threads user and see the discussion happening on Threads, but that it would NOT merge back any comments Mastodon users would post.
Did they announce the two-way sync should be operational by today?
s427
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •The Nexus of Privacy
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •Yeah, I was gonna say ... they did this last summer too. Hey wait a second, I'm noticing a pattern here. And just in time for #FediForum too, stay classy #Threads!
@dansup @pixelfed
FreakinFoss :freebsd: :linux:
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •wraptile
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •means they're afraid!
Have you noticed that fediverse talk gets absolutely no engagement on Threads despite Threads promising to integrate itself with it in the near future. I refuse to believe an average Joe is not interested in decentralization when average Threads commenter is so bent on politics.
Of course it's impossible to test algo timelines unfortunately so we'll never know.
TheTomas
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •Debbie Goldsmith 🏳️⚧️🏳️🌈⧖
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •Sami Määttä
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •FinchHaven sfba
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •Wait
Wait
What?
But I thought Peter Cottle was all on about "federation" and fediforum.org/ just this very morning?
Here: threads.net/@pcottle
cc @pixelfed @timothyjchambers
Peter Cottle (@pcottle) on Threads
ThreadsГригорий Клюшников
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •Aral Balkan
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •Tom Spettigue
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •Tavian C. Lirette
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •fedithom
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •I am SO running out of surprised-faces in modern enshittified tech world.
@aral
err head :pc2black: 🏴☠️ ✂️
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •Crafty
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •Leonie :vf: :kopimi:
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •PetraPanda
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •nrk
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •Tormod Halvorsen
Unknown parent • • •Damn... 🤔 sorry, didn't catch that.
You're right, that’s pretty low, and no, it's a filter someone wrote, tested and deployed, tracked in a Jira ticket. It's not a bug.
cslinuxboy
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •alxdre301 :neocat_flop_sleep:
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •Just Bob 🇺🇲♒🐧🪖
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •Dmitry Borodaenko
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •#Facebook made #WhatsApp block links to #Telegram in 2016: androidpolice.com/2016/09/09/w…
This was not a bug. It took getting caught and called out by tech press for them to quietly back this out.
[Update: Block has been lifted] WhatsApp Is Blocking Telegram Links In Its Android App
Android Policetamas
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •Piotr Kotnis
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •🇺🇦 Optimisey 🇺🇦
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •Kévin ⏚
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •mogoh
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •I tested this and I did not got blocked or anything. threads.net/@mogoh_viol/post/C… So I assume, this was just an accident.
I know everybody loves to hate meta, I am am not a fan either, but I find it hard to believe that they outright ban the word pixelfed.
Mogoh Viol (@mogoh_viol) on Threads
Threadshybrid havoc
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •CynicalElysian
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •Dan W
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •I can understand them defederating from pixelfed instances for commercial or ideological reasons, but actively censoring any mention of a competing service!?
Actually, I can understand Meta doing this, but only in the same way as people who didn’t want to federate with Threads in the first place.
harce
in reply to Daniel Supernault • • •