Salta al contenuto principale


Mozilla has a new CEO. Once again iterating that the future of Firefox is AI first, AI by default:

"Firefox will grow from a browser into a broader ecosystem of trusted software"

"It will evolve into a modern AI browser"

"AI should always be a choice — something people can easily turn off."

Source: blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/le…

reshared this

in reply to Sarah Jamie Lewis

Mozilla insist that people trust them. I assume they have insight and metrics that reinforce that view.

Perhaps I am getting old and this truly is the only path forward to maintain an independent browser.

I continue to feel that this is a terrible idea that has likely irrevocable jeopardized the future of firefox and, by extension, the open web.

in reply to Sarah Jamie Lewis

The overhead of disabling every single AI-first change in Firefox is already starting to weigh on firefox-forks.

My view on this hasn't really shifted in the last few months: unless an existing organization, with strong principles, steps forwards and commits to a hard fork I don't really see a future for Firefox.

(I think there are probably only 1-2 orgs with the combination of experience / maturity to actually pull that off, and none of them seem to be even considering that kind of future)

reshared this

in reply to Sarah Jamie Lewis

Came to same realization a year ago. My choice @Vivaldi - although their overall browser is closed source, and they do use Chromium rendering engine (open source but deeply influenced by Google) they are trustworthy in their defiance of big tech, their intense effort at privacy, blocking every privacy issue Chome does not - and their passion for the Open Social web. Plus their building in of Notes and RSS apps into browser makes you less dependent on cloud systems for such.
in reply to Sarah Jamie Lewis

Feels like Mozilla has been trying to slowly kill Firefox for about 15 years. I think they are close to succeeding.
in reply to Sarah Jamie Lewis

“An ecosystem of trusted software,” built on a foundation of theft. Trusted.
in reply to su_liam

@su_liam
Exactly 👏

AI is stolen labour, Mozilla is promoting stealing from people at the bottom of the pile. It's a really crappy way to behave.

in reply to Sarah Jamie Lewis

sigh...

@mozilla your future isn't AI. you're not trying for VC money, are you? if not, no reason to drink the toxic AI kool-aid. please stop.

go back to your roots. a safe, reliable browser, where safe includes privacy proctection and doesn't include hallucinations.

in reply to Paul_IPv6

@paul_ipv6 @mozilla

It looks like they're so dependent on donations from big tech, that they say stuff to please their big tech donors.

It's a textbook example of how even non-profits can be captured if they are too dependent on corporate donations.

in reply to FediThing

@FediThing @mozilla

so many of us have said this for years but we really need a better model for funding FOSS than crumbs dropped from Big Tech with massive strings attached.

in reply to Paul_IPv6

@paul_ipv6
Governments ought to be funding FOSS more, it's essential infrastructure.

This could even be classified as a national security issue. Proprietary software can be withheld or altered in dangerous ways, FOSS cannot.

(e.g. Trump's government has openly said it might withhold software updates for its planes if countries that have bought these planes don't comply with Trump.)

in reply to FediThing

@FediThing @paul_ipv6 If the US government was funding firefox i wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole though. If there is anything worse than US corps, its US gov.
in reply to Karl Heinz Häsliprinz

@KarlHeinzHasliP @paul_ipv6 I mainly meant that other governments would fund FOSS alternatives so that they aren't dependent on any single country. As things stand, they're dependent on US corporations and those could be compromised in many different ways by Trump etc. We all saw how they sucked up to him throughout 2025.