Salta al contenuto principale


Danish Minister of Justice and chief architect of the current Chat Control proposal, Peter Hummelgaard:

"We must break with the totally erroneous perception that it is everyone's civil liberty to communicate on encrypted messaging services."

Share your thoughts via fightchatcontrol.eu/, or to jm@jm.dk directly.

Source: ft.dk/samling/20231/almdel/REU…

reshared this

in reply to Fight Chat Control

We must break with the totally erroneous perception that it is technically feasible to outlaw encryption.
in reply to Fight Chat Control

Fellas, is it erroneous to want PRIVACY? And must I remind you, oh so grand danish minister of justice and chief architect of the current Chat control proposal, Peter Hummelgaard, that PRIVACY is a human right?

This is laughable at worst. In some days, racism will also be debatable, it seems. What the fuck is going on.

in reply to Fight Chat Control

"We must break with the totally erroneous perception that it is everyone's civil liberty to communicate in a secure way."
"And our highways should be made dangerous to drive, so that criminals cannot use them to escape."
Fucking idiot.
in reply to Fight Chat Control

"We must break with the totally erroneous perception that it is everyone's civil liberty to put curtains on their windows."
in reply to Fight Chat Control

ahem,

Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 12, United Nations Convention on Migrant Workers Article 14, UN
Convention of the Protection of the Child Article 16, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Article 17; regional conventions including Article 10 of the
African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child.

in reply to Fight Chat Control

Hardly surprising that this comes from the Social Democrats. His predecessor as Minister of Justice once defended expanded surveillance in public spaces with the Orwellian claim that “with surveillance, freedom increases” because surveillance supposedly creates safety, and safety somehow equals freedom. Surveillance as freedom: pure doublespeak.
in reply to Fight Chat Control

Fuck this guy 🖕🏻

It is a BASIS of civil liberties that we have privacy and right to nonmonitored communication.

in reply to Fight Chat Control

Privacy is a fundamental human right. Breaking encryption destroys civil liberties for any nation.
in reply to Fight Chat Control

bro didn't read the fundamental rights we are given as EU citizens
in reply to Fight Chat Control

the problem with what #Hummelgraat said, is that on the #internet you either have #encryption based #privacy or you dont have privacy at all. It's like – and I wasnt around then – in the '90s and '00s, with the dot-combubble, or at least, that's what I was told. (I'm from '01)
in reply to Fight Chat Control

If you ever, even for a microsecond, though they are doing it "for the children", here's your answer from the guy himself!
in reply to Fight Chat Control

We must break with the totally erroneous perception that it is politicians liberty to say stupid shit about how people should communicate.
in reply to Fight Chat Control

Meanwhile his party colleague (and former government minister) Henrik Sass Larsen was just sentenced to prison for possessing CSAM. But at least politicians are exempt, right?
in reply to Fight Chat Control

excuse me, sir, but yes i do have that right. I am not a convicted and incarcerated criminal receiving mail that is being read by jailers.