Salta al contenuto principale


Sensitive content

reshared this

in reply to Terence Eden

I've just been asked by @matrix to delete this post. They had the audacity to blame *me* for giving publicity to the problems they have.

If you can't run a service safely, you shouldn't run it at all.

in reply to Terence Eden

to be precise, we said: you are very welcome to publicise our flaws: “Matrix needs way better antispam and moderation controls; I’m not going to use it any more” or whatever. but please do *not* repost abusive spam, spreading it even further, which does nothing other than [give the spammer the attention they want].

Meanwhile, we are working hard on anti-invitespam measures - and we apologise to those hit by the spammer.

in reply to The Matrix.org Foundation

Look, we all get it. Matrix is up against some tough competition and your core product is free and open source. One thing that could go a long ways is including an auto moderator bot for the free groups hosted on matrix.org. Or building in some more controls into the app for group admin and moderator teams.
in reply to Terence Eden

It'll be a shame if @matrix were to be reported for hosting/promoting extreme porn...
in reply to Richard Bairwell

@rbairwell please report abuse to abuse@matrix.org, and feel free to loop in law enforcement too; we do already as per 6.2 of matrix.org/legal/terms-and-con….
in reply to Terence Eden

Seeing posts like this, I simply had disabled invites on my server before it could spread to me, so I've not seen anything.

I'll keep the server for now, while migrating everything to ejabberd. It's got WIP Matrix support, so if I really have to, I'll be able to join a Matrix room, but everything else will be XMPP. There IDs can be hidden in a chat, making the spread of spam much more difficult, just because IDs cannot be scraped as easily.

Really don't wanna see THAT.

in reply to erebion

I deeply regret having brought more than 3k users to Matrix.

This has just hindered us from adopting something better that works well. I also wanted to love Matrix and advertised it for a couple years, always thinking "Yeah, it's new, it will get better", but the issues have always stayed.

The people behind Matrix are nice and I wish them the best. Should the issue get solved in the future: I'll gladly try adopting it again. 😀

in reply to erebion

@erebion we're sorry that you've ended up here. what were the specific issues (on which clients, and which server(s)) which have been problematic? we're trying to map out actionable stuff (e.g. edent's 3pid invite issue in Element X got fixed: github.com/element-hq/element-…; we've been at war against abusive spam - github.com/element-hq/element-… etc) - but worried that actionable stuff is getting lost in the general "it sucks" feedback.
Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
The Matrix.org Foundation
@erebion this is *very* helpful - thanks. it's interesting that performance sounds to be the root problem here. Synapse is certainly not that efficient, but it really shouldn't be that bad, and UTDs really should be dead as of 2024. Fractal hasn't enabled sliding sync yet, which explains why launch is slow, but Element X (for instance) should be instant, not slower than Fractal.
in reply to The Matrix.org Foundation

@erebion the feedback is really *not* being ignored though; just trying to get to the bottom of it. specifically, is your bad experience because you're using a particular server instance which is struggling?
Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
erebion

Please let me know whether this reply is:

(1) helpful or
(2) not helpful

Currently on a train and cannot really focus, so it's a bit stream of conciousness.

Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
erebion

Oh and the privacy features!

XMPP can hide IDs in group chats, making it really hard to scrape IDs and spam.

I wish that simple feature would come to Matrix.

And setting a nick when joining and completely hiding the global nick.

Being able to hide the profile picture in public chats and only share it with contacts.

I don't want to show my face to the whole internet, nor do I want everyone on there to be able to contact me easily.

If those improvements are made -> fanboy.

Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
erebion

I think we need to do something about the gap.

We're stronger together as one large community with an open protocol instead of two divided once.

Together we could take over the world!1!!1!! 😛

Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
erebion

The other large issue, for me personally, is lacking interop with the other open decentralised protocol XMPP.

I run Bifrost, but it seems abandoned and buggy and I will probably have to switch it off soon, as it does not work well.

There was Parsee, which was hosted on a git that's no longer in existence, but still listed on matrix.org as alpha. That looked promising.

To win me back as a fan, personally:

- it must be more performant
- it must be interoperable with XMPP

Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
erebion

Also, I agree "it sucks" is unhelpful.

But also feel like feedback is often just ignored, unfortunately. Hope the community interactions will improve, love the ejabberd community as a positive example.

My issues are mostly not even the spam (I just disabled invites), but mostly sloooow performance. Otherwise I'm fine with it all.

Sometimes Fractal neeeds 30 minutes to sync up when opening, it's written in Rust and should be fast enough.

I suspect Element would be slower.

in reply to erebion

I miss this as well... I am happily using the mautrix bridges, both for signal and whatsapp, and some time ago I asked Tulir about a mautrix-xmpp bridge. It looks like there is not enough interest from the Beeper team to make it happen... If someone has the skill I would be ready to fund the development of such bridge
Questa voce è stata modificata (1 mese fa)
in reply to Centralscrutinizer

I will add another feature request since we're here 😀 What about a way to create and share an element call invitation when starting a call in a bridged room? this way one could actually make video calls to contacts on other platforms...
in reply to Centralscrutinizer

@centralscrutinizer Couldn't we just translate the video call into, for example, XMPP?

Why use a link, if it is all just standardised stuff that could be translated?

Please note I'm not a dev working on these things; I'd love if a dev could comment on this.

I'd like to make interoperability as seamless as possible.

in reply to erebion

I'm not a dev myself, but I would say that would be a nearly impossible job, there are a lot of different clients written in many different languages. But since element call is an independent app and you can already use it to create a conference room, similarly to Jitsi and invite people over, that would mean you could make a call from element to a WhatsApp contact, he could receive the invite and you could both join the call
@element @matrix
Unknown parent

pleroma - Collegamento all'originale
Centralscrutinizer
I'm sorry, I don't think our discussion is contributing much to either project... Altough your last comment has brought a great song to my mind:
radio.novababilonia.me/share/p…
And the lyrics are actually not completely OT ;)
in reply to Centralscrutinizer

@centralscrutinizer How is it impossible?

XMPP already has a way to do video calls.

If Matrix just adds that, we can do some brilliant interop magic.