Signal needs a phone number. Why are we dismissing this as privacy versus anonymity when governments are blocking the registration SMS?
I really don’t get why so many people are turning this into a privacy versus anonymity debate when the real problem is censorship.
Yes, Signal needs a phone number to sign up, but replacing that with an email or username doesn’t make it anonymous. The real issue is that governments are blocking the registration SMS, so people can’t even sign up for the app in the first place.
Sure, there are workarounds, but most people aren’t going to jump through all those extra hoops just to use an app. If we want to spread privacy, how do we do that when Signal's phone number requirement is actively working against us?
Instead of arguing over privacy versus anonymity, shouldn’t we focus on making sure everyone can access Signal without issues? What do you think?
Ulrich
in reply to Autonomous User • • •Autonomous User
in reply to Ulrich • • •Verification code never received [Chinese phone number, previously working]
ksl1989 (GitHub)Ulrich
in reply to Autonomous User • • •Autonomous User
in reply to Ulrich • • •Ulrich
in reply to Autonomous User • • •Autonomous User
in reply to Ulrich • • •Ulrich
in reply to Autonomous User • • •Autonomous User
in reply to Ulrich • • •Ulrich
in reply to Autonomous User • • •Autonomous User
in reply to Ulrich • • •Ulrich
in reply to Autonomous User • • •Okay so you don't have any evidence.
Even if they are, like I mentioned elsewhere, just get a VoIP number.
Autonomous User
in reply to Ulrich • • •Ulrich
in reply to Autonomous User • • •iturnedintoanewt
in reply to Ulrich • • •Ulrich
in reply to iturnedintoanewt • • •Autonomous User
in reply to Ulrich • • •Ulrich
in reply to Autonomous User • • •shades
in reply to iturnedintoanewt • • •Doesn't need to be a government issued ID iirc, also doesn't have to be issued by the country you are trying to purchase it in.
Sailor88
in reply to Autonomous User • • •Autonomous User
in reply to Sailor88 • • •Dessalines
in reply to Autonomous User • • •I'd rather ppl not use US-based centralized services, hosted on amazon's servers, and subject to national security letters.
There are far better self-hostable alternatives that aren't hosted in burgerland.
National Security Letters: FAQ
Electronic Frontier FoundationAutonomous User
in reply to Dessalines • • •github.com/signalapp/Signal-Se…
But you're right about decentralisation. The main issue is:
lemmy.world/comment/19308972
GitHub - signalapp/Signal-Server: Server supporting the Signal Private Messenger applications on Android, Desktop, and iOS
GitHubDessalines
in reply to Autonomous User • • •Autonomous User
in reply to Dessalines • • •rumba
in reply to Autonomous User • • •Different people have different wants and needs.
Your real problem might be censorship.
But your uncensored messages are going to other people who might have a problem that's not censorship. When you sent that message to your uncle last week about all the horrible things done around the world, and he gets stopped at the border to another country, and they used a certain unlocking software provided by another country with a really big intelligence service. Now his ass is waiting in lock up for agreeing with you on a message. His problem isn't censorship.
There are lots of ways to avoid censorship. There are very few to remain anonymous while you're doing it.
herseycokguzelolacak
in reply to rumba • • •Everytime Signal fanboys hype Signal up, it reminds me of this XKCD: xkcd.com/538/
also: lemmy.ml/post/35962253/2100348…
Security
xkcdherseycokguzelolacak
in reply to Autonomous User • • •- Hostility to non-Google appstores
- Using phone numbers and SMS for signup
- US-based entitity controlling the ecosystem
icelimit
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •herseycokguzelolacak
in reply to icelimit • • •SimpleX is promising, but seems very new.
Telegram is better than Signal on many angles, but has other problems.
I don't think there is a perfect app yet. But Signal's aggressive marketing is security-theater, not real security.
Schlemmy
in reply to herseycokguzelolacak • • •Easy to create useful bots too.
Sadly the rest is questionable.
herseycokguzelolacak
in reply to Schlemmy • • •