Benvenuto nel Poliverso

Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱

3 giorni fa • •

Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱
3 giorni fa • •

JFC they're trying to make it so women can't have credit cards again. LIKE MY MOM IN THE 70s

THIS FUCKING SHIT, I swear.

Leave a comment (it matters so much they disabled comments—try anyway): regulations.gov/commenton/CFPB…

Great tiktok on this: tiktok.com/@whattheish/video/7…

TELL EVERYONE

TikTok - Make Your Day

^{www.tiktok.com}

reshared this

in reply to Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱

Bob Blaskiewicz 🇺🇦 🇨🇦 🇬🇱

in reply to Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱 • 3 giorni fa • •

where does it say this in the rules? Just so I can point to the language in my comment.

in reply to Bob Blaskiewicz 🇺🇦 🇨🇦 🇬🇱

Glitzersachen

in reply to Bob Blaskiewicz 🇺🇦 🇨🇦 🇬🇱 • 3 giorni fa • •

@rjblaskiewicz
Please tag me into the answer.

@Bob Blaskiewicz 🇺🇦 🇨🇦 🇬🇱

in reply to Glitzersachen

Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱

in reply to Glitzersachen • 3 giorni fa • •

@glitzersachen @rjblaskiewicz

I skimmed and it's pretty much throughout the whole thing. They have a LOT in there, but here's one:

"the Bureau is proposing to delete language in § 1002.6(a) and its accompanying commentary indicating that disparate-impact liability, which is referred to in the rule as the “effects test,” may be applicable under ECOA, and add language stating that the Act does not recognize the “effects test.”"

@Bob Blaskiewicz 🇺🇦 🇨🇦 🇬🇱 @Glitzersachen

in reply to Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱

Violet Madder

in reply to Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱 • 2 giorni fa • •

@glitzersachen @rjblaskiewicz

I can't make sense of anything in the bizarrely huge wall of text.

@Bob Blaskiewicz 🇺🇦 🇨🇦 🇬🇱 @Glitzersachen

in reply to Violet Madder

Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱

in reply to Violet Madder • 2 giorni fa • •

@violetmadder Intentional obfuscation

@glitzersachen @rjblaskiewicz

@Bob Blaskiewicz 🇺🇦 🇨🇦 🇬🇱 @Violet Madder @Glitzersachen

in reply to Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱

Toast, Shiitake Toast 🕵️‍♂️

in reply to Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱 • 2 giorni fa • •

@violetmadder @rjblaskiewicz @glitzersachen My understanding of this is that so long as the written policies of the financial institutions do not specifically tell employees to discriminate based on any of the protected classes no amount of proof that they are actually discriminating will allow a claim.

Basically, you can’t sue if they don’t admit to the discrimination in writing.

@Bob Blaskiewicz 🇺🇦 🇨🇦 🇬🇱 @Violet Madder @Glitzersachen

in reply to Glitzersachen

Bob Blaskiewicz 🇺🇦 🇨🇦 🇬🇱

in reply to Glitzersachen • 3 giorni fa • •

@glitzersachen try submitting. I got an error. The fucks.

@Glitzersachen

in reply to Bob Blaskiewicz 🇺🇦 🇨🇦 🇬🇱

Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱

in reply to Bob Blaskiewicz 🇺🇦 🇨🇦 🇬🇱 • 3 giorni fa • •

@rjblaskiewicz @glitzersachen

I submitted a ticket to the Help Desk — inundate them until they turn the comments back on

@Bob Blaskiewicz 🇺🇦 🇨🇦 🇬🇱 @Glitzersachen

in reply to Glitzersachen

Elisabeth M

in reply to Glitzersachen • 3 giorni fa (Ricevuto 2 giorni fa) • •

@glitzersachen @rjblaskiewicz she got the name of the act a bit wrong. It's not the equal protections act which says all groups must be treated equally by the law. It's the equal credit opportunity act. Here's a link fwiw; I haven't looked into it: newsweek.com/trump-executive-o…

@Bob Blaskiewicz 🇺🇦 🇨🇦 🇬🇱 @Glitzersachen

reshared this

in reply to Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱

Annelies Kamran, Ph.D.

in reply to Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱 • 3 giorni fa • •

I got an error message

in reply to Annelies Kamran, Ph.D.

Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱

in reply to Annelies Kamran, Ph.D. • 3 giorni fa • •

@akamran I submitted a ticket to the Help Desk — inundate them until they turn the comments back on

@Annelies Kamran, Ph.D.

in reply to Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱

Roy -- the dull one

in reply to Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱 • 3 giorni fa • •

Still another move in the Trump Corruptlican War on Women. And another example of turning Government agencies around to do the opposite of what they were created to do.

Em reshared this.

in reply to Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱

LJ

in reply to Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱 • 3 giorni fa • •

I'm an old guy, born and raised in a Segregated State. Parents worked and lived thru The Great Depression. My oldest brother, a young boy at the time, told me what it was like. It was an example of across the board restricted living with POC being at the bottom of the barrel. I see nothing different in the current republican admin. to make me believe their aim is to be any different.

Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱 reshared this.

in reply to Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱

Em

in reply to Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱 • 2 giorni fa • •

🤬

in reply to Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱

The Turtle

in reply to Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱 • 2 giorni fa • •

i've read the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, and I don't see that. I DO see strong hints of trumpy anti-DEI shit, but it doesn't appear to single out women. If you can point me to that part of the NPR, cool.

in reply to The Turtle

Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱

in reply to The Turtle • 2 giorni fa • •

from the EO that's motivating this:

"adopted and actively use dangerous, demeaning, and immoral race- and sex-based preferences under the guise of so-called "diversity, equity, and inclusion" (DEI)"

WOMEN ARE PART OF ANTI-DEI SHIT, I'm not sure why that's unclear.

govinfo.gov/content/pkg/DCPD-2…

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 giorni fa)

⇧