Salta al contenuto principale


They say AI isn’t profitable. That’s not true.
Twice just this past week, I’ve been contacted and paid to fix problems caused by developers who relied on AI to configure servers.

#AI #IT #SysAdmin

Questa voce è stata modificata (14 ore fa)
in reply to Stefano Marinelli

thank you for putting a big smile on my face with this priceless toot. It needs to be framed and hung at the Louvre 😂
in reply to Stefano Marinelli

great, it's like a polluted river, which generates more wealth by having to clean it up than one with crystal clear water.
in reply to Stefano Marinelli

Exactly.
I'm just sitting by the riverbank and I already saw few corpses of AI poisoned projects float by.
The worst/best thing is that usually when a project implode it does so with very little time to unfuck it, so rates for someone who can fix it without slopping it are high.

reshared this

in reply to Stefano Marinelli

"Did you jump on the bandwagon? It's okay, I help you out - for a right price"
in reply to Stefano Marinelli

I think yesterday or the day before I read something similar about Microsoft delivering poor products to their customers and they literally created an aftermarket and a support ecosystem by this. 🤷‍♀️
Questa voce è stata modificata (14 ore fa)
in reply to Stefano Marinelli

AI bubble secretly created by tech support companies so they get paid to clean up the mess when it pops 😁
Questa voce è stata modificata (14 ore fa)

reshared this

in reply to Stefano Marinelli

AI is just a tool. You have to use it in the right place at the right time.

When someone wants to cut corners, they will just pay for it later. Glad you could invoice for that!

I know other guys who rightfully do not like Windows, but are grateful for the work fixing the crazy things they do.

in reply to Nick Bergen Computer Quest

@NickBergenComputerQuest True. I'm not against technologies. I'm against the abuse of technology. Or misuse of technology. Or imposition of technology.

reshared this

in reply to Stefano Marinelli

True - but... when I was a craftsman, some of my most lucrative jobs were fixing bad builders' errors, usually on a short time schedule; customers in that situation are usually less cost-sensitive & I'd have to work weekends, so my bill went up.

- but it stops being fun very quickly. You're rarely hired to do a good job; just to unfuck someone else's mistakes as much as time & budget allows. For me, at least, this did not make for satisfying work...

Giuseppe Aceto reshared this.

in reply to JWcph, Radicalized By Decency

@jwcph I totally agree. But they usually learn the lesson and stop doing things in the bad way. The next time, they'll call a proper consultant or specialist.
in reply to Stefano Marinelli

It's a great way to open a working relationship - you saved their butt, after all 😁
in reply to Stefano Marinelli

the good news is the AI slop market might create an AI slop fixer position
the bad news is that this might set innovation back a decade
Questa voce è stata modificata (13 ore fa)
in reply to Stefano Marinelli

The absolute horseshit going on right now will keep me employed until 50 years after my death.
in reply to Stefano Marinelli

HAHAHAAA, this is very good. 👍 😂 I hope they paid a bag of money for you. ( and for that AI crap too)
in reply to Stefano Marinelli

Let me state it more accurately. Ai is not profitable to the people who use, operate, or maintain it.
Questa voce è stata modificata (11 ore fa)
in reply to Stefano Marinelli

it's exceptionally profitable for the energy companies who are using this artificial demand to inflate prices. That's why they've subsidized shoehorning AI into everything
in reply to Stefano Marinelli

AI, it turns out, is the Cybertruck of computers.

Overhyped, oversold, overpriced, made billionaires out of liars, and fascists out of greedy billionaires, and it ... rusts.

👏👏👏

This is why 😽 think we're stupid.

Questa voce è stata modificata (4 ore fa)

reshared this

Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
Stefano Marinelli
@uriel Seriously. It's getting more and more common. They need servers -> use AI to tell them how to configure them -> make a mess -> "aaahhh we need the cloud as servers don't work!"
in reply to Stefano Marinelli

we've done that a few times. Somehow 'restore from our last good backup' is often the first step.
in reply to Stefano Marinelli

AI-generated integrated systems config & procedural advice is generally crap dressed up nice.

Some of it might work, but finding what does is like trying to pick a few grains of salt from a bucket of sand.

in reply to Stefano Marinelli

that's what I'll probably live of in the future, as a developer. But I'm not happy at all: fixing vibed code is an horrible task. It's not like fixing code written by an intern: there's intent in that, it probably tried to understand the problem and then (failed at?) deliver a solution.
In the case of vibed code, there's only a list of example inputs and attended results: the generated code may be everything, it's probably easier to rewrite it from scratch, a price the customer will not want to pay, because "it worked perfectly until now!"...
in reply to Stefano Marinelli

Sensitive content