Salta al contenuto principale


"We have ceded so many of the core operations of our lives and institutions to tech, we must recognise that strong encryption isn’t the enemy of security — it *is* security." - Signal President
@Mer__edith for the Financial Times on the war on encryption

ft.com/content/a934150f-e0f5-4…

in reply to Signal

Yes but you are still not Open Source and de centralized. Or usable without Phone Number.

I need to have this for full offline apocalypse, zombie and Doomsday Mode, to trust you my dairy.

P.s. I still love what you done so far. However, every chat got unencrypted and exploited by Apps and advertised on Apple and Google devices with its A.I. ... privacy bank rubbery.

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 mesi fa)
in reply to Signal

thank you for all your work! So glad to donate to such a bad-ass not-for-profit and to have a safe space to talk to my friends and family 💪
in reply to Signal

@schm43cky
So, then I take it from your words in conjunction with the fact that the ICE contractor ShadowDragon is grabbing phone numbers from Signal and using them (presumably to merge with other data) that the use of Signal is contributing to attacks on the privacy of its users.
in reply to Signal

cryptography is protective, and it's not just random hackers after my bank account I'm worried about it's the Nazi government
in reply to Signal

An oldie (2017) but a goodie.
Australia (conservative) leader
"Laws of Australia > Laws of Mathematics"
Anti encryption spiel.
zdnet.com/article/the-laws-of-…
in reply to Signal

We have encryption or we don't. If there is any backdoor then it isn't encryption.