Thunberg Confirms Abuse by Israeli Abductors, But Urges World to Focus on Gaza Genocide | Common Dreams
Thunberg Confirms Abuse by Israeli Abductors, But Urges World to Focus on Gaza Genocide
"This genocide and other genocides are being enabled and fueled by our own governments, our institutions, our media, and companies. It is our responsibility to end that complicity."brett-wilkins (Common Dreams)
like this
Thunberg Confirms Abuse by Israeli Abductors, But Urges World to Focus on Gaza Genocide | Common Dreams
Brett Wilkins
Oct 06, 2025
"This genocide and other genocides are being enabled and fueled by our own governments, our institutions, our media, and companies. It is our responsibility to end that complicity... to use our privileges, our platforms, to take a stance against this, that is in every way unjustifiable,” Thunberg asserted.“I will never, ever comprehend how humans can be so evil that you would deliberately starve millions of people living trapped under an illegal siege as a continuation of decades and decades of suffocating oppression, apartheid, occupation,” she added.
Thunberg Confirms Abuse by Israeli Abductors, But Urges World to Focus on Gaza Genocide
"This genocide and other genocides are being enabled and fueled by our own governments, our institutions, our media, and companies. It is our responsibility to end that complicity."brett-wilkins (Common Dreams)
Maeve likes this.
JB Pritzker Accuses Federal Agents of 'Inciting' Chicago's Residents to Violence
JB Pritzker Accuses Federal Agents of ‘Inciting’ Chicago’s Residents to Violence
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker accused President Trump of "inciting" citizens to violence against ICE and border patrol agents with his "unconstitutional invasion"Sean James (Mediaite)
like this
Flock’s Gunshot Detection Microphones Will Start Listening for Human Voices
Flock’s Gunshot Detection Microphones Will Start Listening for Human Voices
Flock Safety, the police technology company most notable for their extensive network of automated license plate readers spread throughout the United States, is rolling out a new and troubling product that may create headaches for the cities that adop…Electronic Frontier Foundation
like this
Psychiatrists call for RFK Jr. to be replaced as health secretary
Psychiatrists have joined other public health groups in calling for the removal of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as health secretary.
Two psychiatry organizations — the Southern California Psychiatry Society and the recently formed grassroots Committee to Protect Public Mental Health — have released statements saying that the actions of the leader of the Department of Health and Human Services have increased stigma, instilled fear and hurt access to mental health and addiction care.
"As physicians committed to evidence-based care, we are alarmed by the direction of HHS under Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr," the Committee to Protect Public Mental Health said in a statement.
like this
Maryland Judges Weigh Whether Cities Can Sue Over Climate Change
Communities including Baltimore and Annapolis are asking the state’s top court to revive a case accusing oil companies of spreading disinformation.
The Earth is reflecting less and less sunlight, study reveals
The Earth is reflecting less and less sunlight, study reveals
The Earth became darker from 2001 to 2024, meaning it reflects less sunlight, a research team reports in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.Science X (Phys.org)
Europa am Kipppunkt der KI-Ära – Sam Altman und Mathias Döpfner eröffnen die politische Debatte über Souveränität, Freiheit und die Zukunft des Menschen
Mit der Premiere seines neuen Gesprächsformats „MD MEETS“ legt Axel-Springer-CEO Mathias Döpfner die Latte hoch: Kein Politiker, kein Showgast – sondern Sam Altman, der mächtigste KI-Architekt der Gegenwart, CEO von OpenAI. In 45 Minuten sprechen die beiden über nichts Geringeres als das Schicksal Europas, den Sinn des Fortschritts und die Frage, ob der Mensch in der Ära künstlicher Intelligenz überlebt – moralisch, ökonomisch und kulturell.
youtu.be/rF0tQtDMwHM?si=TXlw23…
Dieser Podcast ist mehr als Medienunterhaltung. Es ist eine politische Zäsur. Döpfner, einer der wichtigsten publizistischen Köpfe Europas, trifft den Entwickler jener Technologie, die unsere Demokratien, Arbeitsmärkte und Wahrheitsbegriffe zugleich beflügelt und bedroht. Der Springer-Chef fragt, Altman antwortet – und im Subtext steht die neue Weltordnung der Intelligenzsysteme.
Europas letzte Chance
„Europa darf nicht Weltmeister der Regulierung werden“, warnt Altman. Der Satz klingt technokratisch, ist aber Sprengstoff. In Wahrheit sagt er: Wenn Europa weiter bremst, wird es von der Landkarte der Innovation verschwinden. Altman kündigt den Aufbau einer „OpenAI-Souverän-Cloud für Deutschland“ an – gemeinsam mit SAP und Microsoft. Eine strategische Kampfansage an die digitale Abhängigkeit vom Silicon Valley und zugleich ein Testfall für Europas Selbstbehauptung im Zeitalter der KI.
Döpfner legt den Finger auf die Wunde: Europas Regierungen verteidigen Datenschutz, aber verlieren den Anschluss. Altman kontert höflich, aber bestimmt – KI sei längst weiter, als die meisten wüssten. „Wir haben Systeme, die unsere klügsten Menschen in den schwersten intellektuellen Disziplinen schlagen“, sagt er. Der Satz ist so beiläufig wie beunruhigend. Er beschreibt das Ende des kognitiven Monopols des Menschen – und den Beginn eines Wettlaufs zwischen technologischer Geschwindigkeit und politischer Trägheit.
Arbeit, Würde, Kontrolle
Döpfner fragt nach den Jobs der Zukunft. Altman antwortet, als sähe er in Zeitlupe zu, wie sich eine Zivilisation neu ordnet: „Kurzfristig wird KI viele Jobs zerstören. Langfristig werden völlig neue entstehen.“ Es ist die klassische Fortschrittsformel – und doch schwingt Skepsis mit. Die Frage, was bleibt, wenn Maschinen denken, berühren, komponieren, ist keine ökonomische mehr, sondern eine anthropologische. Altman glaubt an das „unerschöpfliche Bedürfnis des Menschen, gebraucht zu werden“. Eine tröstliche These, die aber zur Nagelprobe wird, wenn ganze Branchen automatisiert werden – von der Anwaltschaft bis zur Redaktion.
Gerade letzteres führt zum Kern des Gesprächs: der Zukunft des Journalismus. Altman erkennt die Paradoxie seiner eigenen Schöpfung: ChatGPT ist zugleich Werkzeug und Risiko für die Öffentlichkeit. „Ich wäre traurig, wenn KI den Journalismus zerstört“, sagt er. Aber er weiß auch, dass sie ihn verwandeln wird. Döpfner bringt das Prinzip auf den Punkt: „Ohne Vergütung für Inhalte trocknet das System aus – dann gibt es nichts mehr, was sich ‚scrapen‘ lässt.“ Eine präzise Beschreibung des neuen Urheberkriegs zwischen Maschine und Medium.
Der neue Prometheus
Philosophisch wird es, als Döpfner Harari und Oscar Wilde zitiert: Wird der Mensch zum Gott? Will Sam Altman ewig leben? Seine Antwort ist überraschend nüchtern: Nein. Ewigkeit sei kein Ziel, sagt er, sondern ein Irrtum. Fortschritt brauche Erneuerung, Sterblichkeit, Übergang. Altman träumt vom Leben als Landwirt, wenn die KI seine Arbeit übernimmt – der Schöpfer, der sich selbst abschafft. Das ist mehr als Anekdote. Es ist ein modernes Gleichnis: Der neue Prometheus will nach der Erleuchtung zurück in den Ackerboden.
Doch zwischen Technikglaube und Natursehnsucht bleibt die offene Frage: Wer kontrolliert die Schöpfung? Altman denkt in geopolitischen Kategorien. KI, sagt er, werde Kriegsführung, Propaganda und Machtbalance grundlegend verändern. Wenn „ein böser Akteur“ Zugang zu Superintelligenz habe, könne er ganze Systeme destabilisieren. Die Konsequenz: globale Governance, ähnlich der nuklearen Rüstungskontrolle. Der Vergleich ist nicht zufällig. KI ist längst eine strategische Waffe – unsichtbar, allgegenwärtig, unkontrolliert.
Freiheit im Zeitalter der Antwortmaschinen
Döpfner und Altman verhandeln schließlich, was auf dem Spiel steht: die Freiheit des Wortes. Für Altman ist sie „einer der schwierigsten, aber zentralsten Werte der westlichen Zivilisation“. Für Döpfner ist sie Geschäftsgrundlage und Überzeugung zugleich. Beide wissen: Wenn Wahrheit von Algorithmen berechnet wird, wird Journalismus zur Gegenmacht – oder verschwindet.
Altman plädiert für neue ökonomische Modelle: Mikropayments für Inhalte, faire Vergütung für journalistische Recherche, eine Rückkopplung von digitalem Nutzen und menschlicher Arbeit. Eine Idee, die Döpfner offen aufnimmt. Der Verleger und der Entwickler eint die Einsicht, dass Information eine Ressource ist, die sich nur dann erneuert, wenn sie einen Wert behält.
Der wahre Inhalt
Die Premiere von „MD MEETS“ ist deshalb mehr als ein Medienereignis. Sie markiert den Moment, in dem KI, Medien und Politik ihre gemeinsamen Bruchstellen öffentlich verhandeln. Altman und Döpfner sprechen über Technologie – und meinen Zivilisation.
Für Europa ist das Gespräch eine Einladung, die eigene Zukunft nicht länger als Beobachter, sondern als Akteur zu gestalten. Wenn Döpfner Altman fragt, was er Europa rät, antwortet der nüchtern: „Reguliert die großen Risiken, aber lasst die kleinen zu.“ In diesem Satz steckt eine Doktrin für die neue Epoche – und vielleicht das letzte Zeitfenster, um nicht endgültig Zuschauer im Theater der Superintelligenz zu werden. Für Sohn@Sohn wäre es wichtig, auf eine granulare Regulierung zu verzichten. Die trifft in der Regel die Kleinen und nicht die Großen, gell Herr Voss…..
ichsagmal.com/europas-ki-regul…
Europas KI-Regulierungskomplex: Der Tanz auf der Rasierklinge - ichsagmal.com
Es ist, als ob die EU immer wieder die gleiche, düstere Melodie spielt: Regulierungswut, ein Synonym für Bürokratie, das sich wie ein Klammergriff um Innovation und Unternehmertum schließt.gsohn (ichsagmal.com)
Russia's digital iron curtain descends further as Kremlin chokes Internet freedoms
Three and a half years into its all-out war against Ukraine, the Kremlin is waging a parallel battle at home — this time against Internet freedom.
The Russian authorities are tightening their digital grip and rolling out sweeping new measures to keep people online in check.
Russian authorities' efforts to block calls via the Telegram and WhatsApp messengers have been going hand in hand with the creation of a Kremlin-controlled "national messenger" called Max, intended to replace foreign equivalents.
"(The Kremlin) has now matured to the point of imposing total control over people's conversations," Russian columnist Sergei Parkhomenko told the Kyiv Independent.
"Before, there were concerns that people might protest, and the authorities would have to somehow explain themselves — but now there's no need to explain anything to anyone: there is only one answer — 'There is a war going on, and therefore you, citizens, no longer have any rights."
Parkhomenko believes that "this is why Putin started the war — to gain the ability to harden his rule more and more, and thus guarantee his hold on power for eternity (or so he hopes)."
Analysts say the latest efforts to stifle Internet freedom are a logical step in the regime's evolution towards totalitarianism. The Kremlin is seeking to emulate China's Great Firewall, a comprehensive censorship system that Beijing has used for decades to crack down on dissent online.
The Russian authorities and VK, the company that developed Russia's Max messenger, did not respond to requests for comment.
Read also: Moscow shooting aftermath: Repressions, racism, terror
Blocking social networks
Russia's efforts to introduce China-style Internet censorship began before the full-scale invasion.
In 2014, following the start of Russia's war against Ukraine, Kremlin-friendly companies took control of Vkontakte (VK), Russia's largest social network, and its owner, Pavel Durov, left the country amid government pressure.
Roskomnadzor, Russia's agency tasked with controlling and censoring mass media, began blocking Durov's Telegram messenger in 2018 after the messenger refused to provide encryption keys to the Federal Security Service (FSB), citing a terrorism investigation. Durov said then that it was impossible technologically and that giving the keys to the FSB would imply changing its encryption mechanisms and enabling the Kremlin to censor the messenger.
Demonstrators hold a stylized icon painting depicting Telegram founder Pavel Durov during a protest against the blocking of the popular messaging app in Russia, at a May Day rally in Saint Petersburg, Russia, on May 1, 2018. (Olga Maltseva / AFP via Getty Images)
However, the agency lifted the ban on Telegram in 2020.
The reasons for the change in the agency's position are unclear.
The attempt to block Telegram was followed by large-scale protests, and Roskomnadzor's efforts proved to be ineffective due to technological issues.
Durov visited Russia more than 50 times from 2014 to 2021, including on the day when the ban on Telegram was lifted, according to Russia's IStories investigative journalism project.
The report triggered speculation that Durov could have reached a deal with the Russian authorities.
After the start of Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022, the country's authorities also banned Facebook and Instagram, citing the platforms' policies of not censoring calls for violence against Russian President Vladimir Putin and Russian soldiers. Meta, the owner of the platforms, eventually backed down and banned such calls, but they were blocked anyway.
In 2024, Roskomnadzor also started slowing down access to YouTube, citing the video hosting service's decisions to block Russian propaganda channels and its refusal to block anti-Kremlin content.
In March 2025, there were also disruptions in Telegram's operations in Russia, and it was banned in the country's Chechnya and Dagestan regions.
In August 2025, Roskomnadzor started blocking calls on Telegram and WhatsApp.
Roskomnadzor claimed the apps have become "the main services used to defraud and extort money, and to involve Russian citizens in sabotage and terrorist activities."
Analysts believe that this claim is just an excuse.
"This has nothing to do with Internet fraud," Parkhomenko told the Kyiv Independent. "Fraudsters will continue to use (and are already using) Max or any other tool in the same way."
In contrast with the Telegram block in 2018, now the Russian authorities are blocking Telegram and WhatsApp more effectively because they have acquired a new censorship technology — Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) boxes, Leonid Iuldashev from eQualitie, a Canadian IT company that develops tools for circumventing censorship, told the Kyiv Independent.
Read also: Putin ‘wins’ rigged Russian election; Ukrainians in occupied territories vote at gunpoint
National messenger
As the Russian authorities tried to block Western social networks, they also took steps to launch a domestic alternative.
In March, the Russian IT company VK released the Max messenger.
Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a law in June to create "a national messenger."
On Sept. 1, the Russian government officially authorized Max as the "national messenger."
It became mandatory to install Max on all new electronic devices. Max also became the default messenger for government and banking services.
Meanwhile, Russia's biggest mobile operators allowed their subscribers to use Max free of charge.
The messenger is completely controlled by the Russian government.
VK, which developed the messenger, is owned by Russia's state gas giant Gazprom and tycoon Yury Kovalchuk, known as Putin's personal banker.
VK's CEO is Vladimir Kiriyenko, the son of Putin's Deputy Chief of Staff Sergei Kiriyenko, a Kremlin heavyweight responsible for the country's entire domestic policy.
Russian President Vladimir Putin (R) and his first deputy chief of staff Sergei Kiriyenko (L) observe an exhibition prior to the All-Russia’s Open Lesson in Yaroslavl, Russia, on Sept. 1, 2017. (Mikhail Svetlov / Getty Images)
Max requests access to the camera and the microphone, as well as geolocation, contacts, files, Bluetooth, notifications, and biometrics. The messenger also logs all activity within the app and collects information about users' age, gender, phone numbers, emails, and social media IDs.
Although Western messengers also request similar information, providing such access to Max is more dangerous since its official policy states that it can submit any information to the authorities. Experts believe that Max will be routinely used to spy on users.
Russian residents interviewed by the Kyiv Independent provided different perspectives on the introduction of the national messenger and bans on Western social networks.
A 40-year-old Russian photographer who supports "restoring the Soviet Union" told the Kyiv Independent that she would not use Max, WhatsApp, or Telegram because she is against what she called a "digital concentration camp."
The Max Messenger logo is seen displayed on a smartphone screen. (Thomas Fuller / SOPA Images / LightRocket via Getty Images)
"I don't have a smartphone and have never had one," she said. I have a dumbphone and a laptop. I've predicted this whole digital concentration camp more than three moves ahead."
A 60-year old teacher who supports the war against Ukraine told the Kyiv Independent she has not yet installed the Max messenger but is not afraid of using it.
"I don't have any anti-government thoughts," she said. "I'll have to switch to the Max messenger — otherwise, I won't be able to access many (government) apps or use them fully."
The sources spoke on condition of anonymity due to the fear of reprisals.
Read also: Navalny’s death preceded by long list of Putin critics’ murders
Internet shutdowns and VPNs
Since May, Russia has also experienced frequent fixed-line and mobile Internet shutdowns all over the country. The authorities argued the shutdowns were necessary to counteract Ukrainian drone attacks, but analysts believe it is part of Russia's efforts to tighten control over people's online presence.
In August, Russia experienced 2,129 Internet shutdowns — an all-time record, according to the Association for the Protection of the Internet. The global number of Internet shutdowns in 2024 was 296, according to Access Now, a U.S. group that fights Internet censorship.
The Russian authorities have also cracked down on VPN services that allow users to circumvent blocks.
"The logic is simple: if anything is out of control of the siloviki (Russia's intelligence and law enforcement agencies), it is a threat and has to be banned."
Russia passed a law in 2020 to ban virtual private networks (VPNs) used for bypassing blocks. Initially it was not enforced strictly. However, the authorities have stepped up efforts to block VPNs since then.
Starting from Sept. 1, 2025, Russia also banned VPN ads and introduced fines for searching "extremist materials" — essentially any information critical of the Kremlin — using VPNs.
Iuldashev from eQualitie said that the Kremlin is trying to block all major VPNs.
"But while they do it, VPN developers develop new protocols at the same time," he said. "We are still able to provide access to free Internet to people from China, Russia, Vietnam, and other countries. It's impossible to block everything."
Read also: Alexei Navalny’s life and death as main opponent to Putin regime
Copying foreign experience
By introducing sweeping restrictions on the Internet, Russia is copying China's censorship system, called the Great Firewall. Max is modeled after WeChat, China's state-controlled national messenger.
Iuldashev said that the Kremlin aims to achieve the same results as China, but the Russian system is more decentralized.
"China has fostered domestic substitutes for international services, and they ruled out most Western platforms from the outset," he said. "Russia, on the contrary, has allowed many Western platforms for years, and then they started (blocking them)."
He said that "it's hard to imagine that Russia can build a (China-style) centralized censorship system in this very diverse landscape of networks.
News footage on a giant screen outside a shopping mall in Beijing, China, shows Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping shaking hands during a welcoming ceremony before their talks at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, on May 8, 2025. (Pedro Pardo / AFP via Getty Images)
"But the decentralized model also looks quite effective," Iuldashev added. "It's just another way to achieve the same result."
He also said that Russia is seeking to mimic the censorship technology of Iran, which is among the worst countries in terms of Internet freedom.
There is also speculation that Russia may shut down the Internet completely, similarly to North Korea.
But Iuldashev thinks a permanent shutdown is unlikely.
"On the technical level, it's possible," he said. "But it's strange to compare it with North Korea, because North Korea has never had a proper Internet. But Russia has all the possible connections to the global Internet."
He argued, however, that temporary and regional Internet shutdowns are likely if there are some political risks.
"They don't need to actually shut down the whole country," he said. "They can just shut down a particular place."
Read also: How Kadyrov became so powerful, and why Chechnya remains vital for survival of Putin’s regime
Diving into totalitarianism
Iuldashev said that Russia started to create a "sovereign Internet" right after annexing Crimea in 2014. Now, however, this process has accelerated.
Ryhor Nizhnikau, a Russia expert at the Finnish Institute of International Affairs, said that "Russia has been moving towards online control and 'Internet sovereignty' for years."
"The logic is simple: if anything is out of control of the siloviki (Russia's intelligence and law enforcement agencies), it is a threat and has to be banned," he told the Kyiv Independent.
Arkady Moshes, a Russian-born researcher at the Finnish Institute of International Affairs, said that "this should be viewed as an element of Russia transiting from authoritarianism towards totalitarianism, which implies total control."
Another Russian political analyst said that creating a China-like censorship model "requires additional technical improvements and overcoming users' inertia."
The analyst spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals.
"Even if they are not politicized, they are very reluctant to give up the conveniences of everyday life. So far, the state is not totalitarian enough to move everyone over to Max, but it is striving for that and will continue to do so," the analyst added.
Read also: Evidence shows recent presidential elections most rigged in Russia’s modern history
Evidence shows recent presidential elections most rigged in Russia’s modern history
The March 15-17 presidential election was the most rigged in Russia's modern history, according to evidence published by election experts, observers, and media. Estimates of vote rigging range from at least 22 million votes to about 31.Oleg Sukhov (The Kyiv Independent)
Why doesn't the Fediverse have a "one sign-in" like NOSTR?
I recently re-tried NOSTR (I technically have an old account I rarely ever use), specifically on Primal and the Fountain Podcasts app, and I really enjoyed how simple it was: just sign in, and BAM—you’re in.
No fuss, no extra steps.
It got me wondering—why doesn’t the Fediverse work like that? I know that using special login codes might be too complex for most people, but why not allow usernames and passwords instead?
Imagine a single sign-in for the entire Fediverse. You wouldn’t need to worry about instances, and onboarding could be much simpler.
Has this idea been considered, or is there a technical reason why it wouldn’t work?
like this
Because implementing that shit is hard.
Nostr definitely has some interesting/good implementation details, and on a spectrum of ease of censoring users, Bluesky is on one end, Fedi is in the middle, and Nostr (if it gets big enough) is on the other end.
But also with Nostr, I really hope you backed up those account keys, because if you didn't and you lose your device, your access to that account is gone forever.
Every way of decentralizing a social media system has advantages and disadvantages.
like this
I do wish cross-posting between fediverse types (microblogs, link aggregators, image sharing) was as easy as cross-posting within them.
I know it's technically feasible to comment on a Lemmy post from your mastodon account (at least, that's what I was told), but it's not easy or intuitive.
like this
nuova aggreganza con la goduria integrata: rilascio aggregatore di feed Aggregodo (Aggregoctt v3 ma per bene)
Oggi, considerato lo stato inevitabile dell’assoluto, sono abbastanza sicura che godo… ma, in realtà, un po’ sarà anche da stamattina che godo… per non dire in verità ieri sera tardissimo… Situazione assurda, lo so, ma tutto ciò è per via del fatto che, il nuovissimo software benedettissimo che ho finito or ora (…o ieri sera, […]
He Would've Escaped - How The FBI Really Caught Tyler Robinson
cross-posted from: lemmy.world/post/36982928
Tyler Robinson, the suspect of the Charlie Kirk's assassination, almost got away with it all. This is how the FBI really caught him. Support my independent work: / thehatedoneThe FBI is telling you that the manhunt for the suspect of Charlie Kirk's assassination was a result of a historic investigation with the use of the most advanced intelligence techniques available to law enforcement.
But the reality will tell you a different story. A story that is now very well reported and reveals how the suspect was actually caught. In what's about to follow, I'll explain to you every detail of the surveillance and intelligence behind the manhunt for Tyler Robinson, the alleged shooter at Utah Valley.
In reality, it is not clear whether anything the FBI did actually helped track down the suspect.The most damning admission of this fact is that after a full day of endless investigation, full 24 hours after Charlie Kirk was shot, the FBI, Kash Patel and local law enforcement were so confused they had “no idea where” the suspect was and they weren’t even sure whether he still was in Utah or not.
By the time the police did finally catch Tyler Robinson, he was so far away from the scene of the shooting that had he simply kept running, he probably would’ve gone away with it. He was arrested 250 miles away, in his parental home in St. George, Utah, whole 33 hours after the shooting.
SOURCES [References available in the transcript: / how-they-really-140361439 ]
[0] • Kash Patel discusses investigation into Ch...
[1] nytimes.com/2025/09/12/us...
[2] nytimes.com/live/2025/09/...
[3] tmz.com/2025/09/13/tyler-...
[4] • Chilling Emergency Dispatch Audio Captured...
[5] news.sky.com/story/charlie-ki.…
[6] nytimes.com/interactive/2...
[7] archive.is/K6rQw
[8] archive.today/01VkR
[9] nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...
[10] archive.today/4BcVY
[11] nytimes.com/2025/09/11/us...
[12] https://x.com/UtahDPS/status/19662919...
[13] economist.com/science-and...
[14] technologyreview.com/2025...
[15] • Tyler Robinson, suspect in fatal shooting ...
[16] • You Can Run but Not Hide: Improving Gait R...
[17] ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/.…
[18] arxiv.org/abs/2306.17206
[19] • Suspected Charlie Kirk shooter seen in sur...
[20] innovationcenter.msu.edu/who-.…
[21] tmz.com/2025/09/13/tyler-...
[22] https://x.com/TMZ/status/196627181449...
[23] marketplace.fedramp.gov/produ.…
[24] arxiv.org/abs/2505.04616
[25] arxiv.org/pdf/2310.15946
[26] openaccess.thecvf.com/content.…
[27] • Raw Video: Charlie Kirk shooting suspect a...
[28] bbc.com/news/articles/c20...
[29] newsweek.com/tyler-robins...
FarSight: MSU's new biometric recognition system- MSU Innovation Center
MSU researchers are developing FarSight, a drone biometric recognition system using face, body & gait recognition, with a $12M grant to ID people at a distance.Mikayla Conners (MSU Innovation Center)
like this
Huawei Zurich Lab’s New Open-Source Tech Lets LLMs Run on Consumer GPUs
Huawei Zurich Lab’s New Open-Source Tech Lets LLMs Run on Consumer GPUs
Huawei’s Zurich Computing Systems Laboratory has released SINQ (Sinkhorn Normalization Quantization), an open-source quantization method that reduces theTechNode Feed (TechNode)
Ez drummer/addictive drums
[Technology Connections] Catalytic converters are simple, but getting them to work is not [41:46]
- YouTube
Profitez des vidéos et de la musique que vous aimez, mettez en ligne des contenus originaux, et partagez-les avec vos amis, vos proches et le monde entier.www.youtube.com
like this
Technology reshared this.
Greta Thunberg gives first public speech since Israeli kidnapping – video
cross-posted from: ibbit.at/post/74406
Human rights and climate activist Greta Thunberg has spoken publicly for the first time after her kidnapping, detention, and abuse at the hands of the Israeli government:thecanary.co/wp-content/upload…
Greta Thunberg released
As the Canary previously reported, on Saturday 4 October the Israeli occupation authorities deported 137 of the kidnapped international solidarity activists who participated in the Global Sumud Flotilla to break the humanitarian siege on Gaza, in the second deportation operation in a matter of days, after returning four Italians to their country on Friday 3 October.One of the deported activists who arrived at Istanbul airport on Saturday recounted shocking details of what he described as ‘brutal assaults’ on some activists during their detention, telling reporters:
They dragged little Greta (Thunberg) by her hair in front of our eyes, beat her, and forced her to kiss the Israeli flag. They did everything imaginable to her as a warning to others.She’s still a little kid. They made her suffer.
Separately, the Guardian reported that an email to Swedish authorities said Greta Thunberg was suffering from:
dehydration. She has received insufficient amounts of both water and food. She also stated that she had developed rashes which she suspects were caused by bedbugs. She spoke of harsh treatment and said she had been sitting for long periods on hard surfaces.Meanwhile, other released activists spoke of similar degrading treatment.
Turkish activist Samanur Sonmaz Yaman, a member of the flotilla, recounts details of the occupation’s oppression and abuse of veiled women from the boats:
Occupation soldiers ripped off our headscarves during our arrest and took them from us, and our non-veiled friends gave us their shirts to cover our heads.
Ongoing Israeli violence
Adalah, the legal centre that monitors the cases of detainees, said that detention conditions at Ketziot prison in the Negev desert are ‘deteriorating alarmingly,’ amid reports of ill-treatment and violence against some detainees.A spokesperson for the organisation said that it is difficult at this stage to provide a comprehensive assessment, but confirmed that the mistreatment primarily affects non-European detainees, especially those whose countries do not have diplomatic missions in Israel.
This incident is the latest chapter in the confrontation between Israel and the international solidarity flotillas that recently set sail in an attempt to break the blockade imposed on the Gaza Strip for more than 18 years, amid growing international warnings about targeting solidarity activists and civil society activists, and the deteriorating humanitarian situation in the Strip, which is suffering from famine and shortages of medicine and fuel.
Israel intercepted 40 ships in the Global Solidarity Flotilla that set sail to reach Gaza to break the blockade and deliver humanitarian aid amid the ongoing war of extermination on Gaza, which is now entering its third year.
Featured image via the Canary
By Skwawkbox
From Canary via this RSS feed
Greta Thunberg: ‘We Are Not Heroes. We Are Doing The Bare Minimum’
cross-posted from: ibbit.at/post/74437
From Novara Media via this RSS feed
Novara Media
Donate one hour’s wage per month or whatever you can afford to fund independent, truthful media.YouTube
This is the future of heat pumps! | Just Have a Think
- YouTube
Profitez des vidéos et de la musique que vous aimez, mettez en ligne des contenus originaux, et partagez-les avec vos amis, vos proches et le monde entier.www.youtube.com
Journalist on Gaza Flotilla Describes “Torturous Conditions” in Israeli Custody
Journalist on Gaza Flotilla Describes “Torturous Conditions” in Israeli Custody
“They were throwing people’s medicine in the bin in front of them and laughing in their faces,” says Kieran Andrieu.Amy Goodman (Truthout)
Lawmakers Demand Information About Potential Use of Paragon Spyware by ICE
Lawmakers Demand Information About Potential Use of Paragon Spyware by ICE
The lawmakers warned that allowing ICE to use spyware “threatens Americans’ freedom of movement and freedom of speech.”…Elizabeth Weill-Greenberg (Truthout)
Greta Thunberg: ‘We Are Not Heroes. We Are Doing The Bare Minimum’
- YouTube
Profitez des vidéos et de la musique que vous aimez, mettez en ligne des contenus originaux, et partagez-les avec vos amis, vos proches et le monde entier.www.youtube.com
What Extreme Heat Is Doing to Your Body
Kevin Miller can get a person to the brink of heat stroke in 30 minutes.
In a chamber with a temperature of around 100 degrees, he starts them out on the treadmill, switching off between three minutes of walking and two minutes at an all-out sprint. Soon, they’re breathing faster, their blood vessels are dilating and their heart is working overtime to pump much more blood than usual through their body, fighting to get oxygen to their muscles and organs.
In Miller’s lab, these participants are safe: He brings them close to the heat-stroke threshold of a 105-degree core body temperature in the name of science, to test the efficacy of different treatments.
Heat is the No. 1 weather-related cause of death worldwide and in the United States. Miller is one of the many researchers globally who are expanding our understanding of what heat does to the body and how to counteract its effects. Recently, his Texas State University lab has had success cooling participants using a body bag full of ice—a tactic that is affordable and transportable for emergency responders. Rapid cooling is life-saving medicine.
But heat’s impacts aren’t limited to these obvious moments of emergency. It has a bearing on nearly every aspect of human health, from our skin down to our DNA.
That means long-term exposure to high temperatures—increasingly common as the Earth warms—is causing cumulative harm to our bodies and minds.
What Extreme Heat Is Doing to Your Body - Inside Climate News
As climate change intensifies, heat health risks from accelerated aging to bad decision-making grow worldwide. Here’s what you need to know.Inside Climate News
Xbox x/s or PS5 emulators for PC
What are my options for emulating Xbox or PS5 games on PC, preferably Linux, if there are any good?
My next problem would be acquiring NHL25 rom or whatever it’s called these days. I’ve been out of the piracy loop for a few years, but a relative wants to play that specific game and doesn’t feel like shelling out cash for a console.
Searching has given me some ideas, but some first hand experience or pointers would be appreciated, thanks in advance
like this
Like the fact that someone can get shot for offering to get their neighbour high,
while companies can litteraly operate like crime syndicates with minimal repercussion
might be a cause for people thinking the law is just opression instead of a guideline that can be actually used
Modelo de Termos de Uiso e Política de Privacidade
Olá pessoal. Uma das questões importantes que temos percebido entre as pessoas que iniciam suas instâncias, são as dúvidas sobre modelos de termos de uso e políticas de privacidade. Mesmo que plataformas como o Mastodon disponibilize um modelo, o conteúdo não está totalmente de acordo com a legislação brasileira. Por esse motivo, sistematizamos um texto voltado para a LGPD para a avaliação e uso da comunidade:
TERMOS DE USO E POLÍTICA DE PRIVACIDADE - PLATAFORMA XXX
Última atualização: \[Data\]
1. ACEITAÇÃO DOS TERMOSEste Termo estabelece as condições para utilização da plataforma XXX e as responsabilidades relativas ao conteúdo publicado. Ao criar uma conta ou utilizar a plataforma, você declara ser maior de 18 anos e concorda com estes termos e com o tratamento de dados conforme a Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (Lei 13.709/2018).
2. TERMOS IMPORTANTESEstes termos incluem disposições que afetam seus direitos e responsabilidades, incluindo isenção de responsabilidade, limites de obrigações da XXX, sua responsabilidade por custos decorrentes de má utilização da plataforma.
3. SUA PERMISSÃO PARA USAR A PLATAFORMASujeito a estes termos, a XXX concede permissão para usar a plataforma. É necessário aceitá-los para utilizá-la.
4. CONDIÇÕES DE USOSua permissão para usar a plataforma está sujeita às seguintes condições:
- Você precisa ter pelo menos 18 anos de idade
- Você não poderá mais usar a plataforma se a XXX revogar sua permissão
- Você deverá usar a plataforma de acordo com Uso Aceitável e Padrões de Conteúdo
5. USO ACEITÁVELVocê não poderá:
- Infringir leis através da plataforma
- Usar ou tentar usar a conta de outro usuário sem consentimento
- Comercializar identificadores de outros usuários
- Enviar spam ou coletar dados para listas comerciais
- Automatizar o acesso à plataforma, exceto para indexação por mecanismos de busca
- Usar a plataforma para envio de listas de distribuição
- Sugerir falsa afiliação com a XXX
- Criar hyperlinks para imagens ou outros conteúdos não textuais
- Remover marcas de propriedade de materiais baixados
- Burlar medidas de segurança ou restrições de acesso
- Sobrecarregar a infraestrutura com solicitações excessivas
- Praticar falsa identidade
- Incentivar terceiros a violar estes termos
6. PADRÕES DE CONTEÚDOVocê não pode enviar conteúdo:
- Ilegal, ofensivo, abusivo, de ódio ou assédio
- Que viole leis, direitos de propriedade intelectual ou privacidade
- Com código malicioso (vírus, spyware)
- Para reservar endereços, nomes de usuário ou identificadores
- Que revele informações confidenciais de terceiros
7. APLICAÇÃOA XXX pode investigar e processar violações destes termos utilizando todas as medidas legais aplicáveis, notificando e cooperando com autoridades quando necessário.
8. SUA CONTAPara acessar certos recursos, você deve criar uma conta com informações válidas, incluindo e-mail atualizado. Você é responsável por todas as ações em sua conta até seu encerramento ou notificação de comprometimento. Você deve notificar a XXX imediatamente em caso de suspeita e manter uma senha segura. A XXX pode restringir, suspender ou encerrar sua conta por violação destes termos.
9. SEU CONTEÚDOO conteúdo enviado pertence a você, e você decide quais permissões conceder. Você concede à XXX licença para copiar, publicar e analisar seu conteúdo na plataforma. Esta licença expira quando o conteúdo é removido e eliminado dos sistemas da XXX.
10. SUA RESPONSABILIDADEVocê concorda em indenizar a XXX por ações judiciais relacionadas a violações destes termos por você ou através de sua conta.
11. ISENÇÃO DE RESPONSABILIDADEVocê aceita os riscos de usar a plataforma e seu conteúdo. Conforme a lei, a plataforma é fornecida "no estado em que se encontra", sem garantias.
12. LIMITES DE OBRIGAÇÃOA XXX e seus fornecedores não terão obrigação por danos não previstos quando você aceitou estes termos.
13. ENCERRAMENTOVocê ou a XXX podem encerrar este acordo a qualquer momento, cessando então sua permissão de uso.
14. LITÍGIOSDisputas relativas a estes termos serão resolvidas em tribunais \[especificar foro\].
POLÍTICA DE PRIVACIDADE
15. INFORMAÇÕES COLETADAS
Informações básicas da conta: Se se registar neste servidor, poderá ser solicitado que introduza um nome de utilizador, um endereço de e-mail e uma palavra-passe. Pode também introduzir informações adicionais de perfil, como um nome de exibição e uma biografia, e carregar uma imagem de perfil e uma imagem de cabeçalho. O nome de utilizador, nome de exibição, biografia, imagem de perfil e imagem de cabeçalho são sempre listados publicamente.
Publicações, seguidores e outras informações públicas: A lista de pessoas que segue é listada publicamente, o mesmo se aplica aos seus seguidores. Quando submete uma mensagem, a data e a hora são armazenadas, bem como a aplicação a partir da qual a submeteu. As mensagens podem conter ficheiros anexos de media, como imagens e vídeos. As publicações públicas e não listadas estão disponíveis publicamente. Quando destaca uma publicação no seu perfil, essa informação também fica publicamente disponível. As suas publicações são entregues aos seus seguidores; em alguns casos, isso significa que são entregues em servidores diferentes e cópias são lá armazenadas. Quando elimina publicações, esta ação é igualmente entregue aos seus seguidores. A ação de republicar ou favoritar outra publicação é sempre pública.
Publicações diretas e apenas para seguidores: Todas as publicações são armazenadas e processadas no servidor. As publicações apenas para seguidores são entregues aos seus seguidores e aos utilizadores mencionados nelas, e as publicações diretas são entregues apenas aos utilizadores mencionados nelas. Em alguns casos, isso significa que são entregues a servidores diferentes e cópias são lá armazenadas. Fazemos um esforço de boa fé para limitar o acesso a essas publicações apenas a pessoas autorizadas, mas outros servidores podem não o fazer. Por isso, é importante rever os servidores a que pertencem os seus seguidores. Pode ativar uma opção para aprovar e rejeitar novos seguidores manualmente nas definições. Por favor, tenha em mente que os operadores do servidor e de qualquer servidor recetor podem visualizar tais mensagens, e que os destinatários podem capturar ecrã, copiar ou partilhá-las de outra forma. Não partilhe informações sensíveis através da plataforma.
IPs e outros metadados: Quando inicia sessão, registamos o endereço IP a partir do qual acede, bem como o nome da sua aplicação de navegador. Todas as sessões iniciadas estão disponíveis para sua revisão e revogação nas definições. O último endereço IP utilizado é armazenado por até 12 meses. Também podemos reter registos (logs) do servidor que incluem o endereço IP de todos os pedidos feitos ao nosso servidor.
16. FINALIDADES DO TRATAMENTOQualquer uma das informações que recolhemos de si pode ser usada das seguintes formas:
- Para fornecer a funcionalidade central da plataforma. Só pode interagir com o conteúdo de outras pessoas e publicar o seu próprio conteúdo quando tem a sessão iniciada.
- Para auxiliar na moderação da comunidade, por exemplo, comparando o seu endereço IP com outros conhecidos para determinar evasão de banimento ou outras violações.
- O endereço de e-mail que fornece pode ser usado para enviar informações, notificações sobre outras pessoas a interagirem com o seu conteúdo ou a enviarem-lhe mensagens, e para responder a perguntas e/ou outros pedidos.
17. MEDIDAS DE SEGURANÇAImplementamos uma variedade de medidas de segurança para manter a segurança das suas informações pessoais quando as introduz, submete ou acede. Entre outras coisas, a sua sessão do navegador, bem como o tráfego entre as suas aplicações e a API, são protegidos com SSL, e a sua palavra-passe é codificada (hashed) usando um algoritmo forte unidirecional. Pode ativar a autenticação de dois fatores para proteger ainda mais o acesso à sua conta.
18. RETENÇÃO DE DADOSFaremos um esforço de boa fé para:
- Reter os registos (logs) do servidor contendo o endereço IP de todos os pedidos para este servidor, na medida em que tais registos sejam mantidos, por não mais de 90 dias.
- Reter os endereços IP associados a utilizadores registados por não mais de 12 meses.
- Pode solicitar e transferir um arquivo do seu conteúdo, incluindo as suas publicações, ficheiros de media anexos, imagem de perfil e imagem de cabeçalho.
- Pode eliminar a sua conta de forma irreversível a qualquer momento.
19. COOKIESSim. Os cookies são pequenos ficheiros que um site ou seu prestador de serviços transfere para o disco rígido do seu computador através do seu navegador da Web (se permitir). Estes cookies permitem que o site reconheça o seu navegador e, se tiver uma conta registada, associe-o à sua conta registada. Utilizamos cookies para compreender e guardar as suas preferências para visitas futuras.
20. COMPARTILHAMENTO COM TERCEIROSNão vendemos, negociamos ou transferimos de outra forma para terceiros externos a sua informação de identificação pessoal. Isto não inclui terceiros de confiança que nos auxiliam a operar o nosso site, a conduzir os nossos negócios ou a prestar-lhe serviço, desde que essas partes concordem em manter esta informação confidencial. Também podemos divulgar as suas informações quando acreditamos que a divulgação é apropriada para cumprir a lei, fazer cumprir as políticas do nosso site ou proteger os nossos ou os direitos, propriedade ou segurança de outros.
O seu conteúdo público pode ser transferido (descarregado) por outros servidores da rede. As suas publicações públicas e apenas para seguidores são entregues aos servidores onde residem os seus seguidores, e as mensagens diretas são entregue aos servidores dos destinatários, na medida em que esses seguidores ou destinatários residam num servidor diferente deste.
Quando autoriza uma aplicação a usar a sua conta, dependendo do âmbito das permissões que aprovar, ela pode aceder às informações do seu perfil público, à sua lista de seguidores, aos seus seguidores, às suas listas, a todas as suas publicações e aos seus favoritos. As aplicações nunca podem aceder ao seu endereço de e-mail ou palavra-passe.
21. SEUS DIREITOS LGPDNos termos da Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (LGPD), você tem direito a:
- Acessar e corrigir seus dados pessoais
- Solicitar a eliminação de dados desnecessários
- Revogar consentimentos a qualquer momento
- Obter informações sobre compartilhamento com terceiros
- Solicitar a portabilidade de dados
Para exercer estes direitos, entre em contato através do e-mail: \[e-mail de privacidade\]
22. ENCARREGADO PELA PROTEÇÃO DE DADOSPara questões sobre proteção de dados, contate nosso Encarregado: E-mail: \[e-mail do DPO\] Endereço: \[endereço físico da organização\]
23. ALTERAÇÕESEstes termos foram atualizados pela última vez em XX de XXX de 2025 e poderão ser atualizados novamente. Publicaremos todas as atualizações na plataforma. Para atualizações com alterações consideráveis, enviaremos notificação por e-mail se você tiver criado uma conta e fornecido um endereço válido.
24. CONTATOVocê poderá notificar a empresa sobre estes termos, além de enviar perguntas, em \[e-mail da organização\].
A XXX poderá notificar sob estes termos através do endereço de e-mail da sua conta, ou através de mensagem na página inicial da plataforma ou na página da sua conta.
Modelo de Regras de Instância
Com a mesma proposta de alinhamento e colaboração do modelo de termos de uso e política de privacidade, reunimos neste texto algumas regras comuns utilizadas nas instâncias brasileiras para quem estiver começando e gostaria de um ponto de partida:
REGRAS
Marco Civil da Internet, e LGPDA \[nome da instância\] respeita e está sujeita ao Marco Civil da Internet, à LGPD e às leis contra crimes digitais.
Você deve ter 18 anos completos ou mais.Ao se cadastrar na \[nome da instância\], você declara ser maior de idade. Contas de menores de 18 anos serão suspensas.
Proibição de Conteúdo Ilícito ou AbusivoÉ proibido compartilhar pornografia não consensual e Deepfakes maliciosos.
Proibição de Discurso de ÓdioMachismo, misoginia, racismo, xenofobia, transfobia, homofobia, Apologia a qualquer forma de opressão, exploração ou humilhação, defesa de governos autoritários, nazismo, fascismo ou nacionalismo extremista.
Proibição de DoxxingA publicação de conteúdo privado sem consentimento (doxxing) resultará em suspensão imediata.
Sobre Conteúdo Violento ou Chocante Sempre use aviso de conteúdo (CW). Imagens sensíveis devem ser marcadas adequadamente.
Contas Fake ou de ParódiaContas falsas (incluindo marcas ou celebridades) devem ser sinalizadas como paródia.
AcessibilidadeDescreva imagens e vídeos (use ALT TEXT) sempre que possível.
Conteúdo Gerado por IAIdentifique imagens criadas por IA com a tag #aiart. Inclua o nome da ferramenta (ex.: #midjourney). Adicione o prompt no texto alternativo (ALT).
Apresente-seAo criar a conta, sugerimos que faça uma apresentação sua e inclua a tag #Apresentação.
Furloughs hit federal employees exempt from shutdown, laid-off staff told to keep working
The General Services Administration is furloughing employees who are typically “exempt” from a government shutdown, because much of the agency isn’t funded through congressional appropriations.
GSA employees told Federal News Network these furloughs are happening contrary to the agency’s recent messages to staff, and run contrary to the agency’s longstanding practices during a shutdown.
Meanwhile, GSA has inadvertently sent notices to employees it laid off months ago, telling them that they are exempt and should continue working during the shutdown. A similar situation occurred in at least one other agency.
A GSA employee said the agency’s Federal Acquisition Service has furloughed staff who are funded through the Acquisition Services Fund, a revolving fund that includes revenue GSA receives for the services to provides to other agencies.
Furloughs hit federal employees exempt from shutdown, laid-off staff told to keep working
GSA’s Federal Acquisition Service and Public Buildings Service were “given a number to hit,” in terms of furloughs, according to an employee.Jory Heckman (Federal News Network)
Theodore Roosevelt Presidential Library using $70M Bank of North Dakota line of credit • North Dakota Monitor
North Dakota lawmakers in 2023 first established the line of credit through the state-owned bank to allow construction on the $450 million library in Medora to continue if donations have been pledged but not yet received by the library foundation. The loan did not get used in the 2023-25 budget cycle.
Lawmakers voted earlier this year to continue that line of credit. Unlike a traditional loan, a line of credit allows the borrower to access the funds only as needed, saving money on interest, said Kelvin Hullet, chief business development officer for the Bank of North Dakota.
The library foundation began accessing the funds for the first time in July, with the balance now at $53 million, Hullet said Friday.
Chitarrista degli Oasis malato: Paul “Bonehead” Arthurs lascia il reunion tour, rientro atteso per le date sudamericane di novembre
Scossone nel reunion tour degli Oasis: Paul “Bonehead” Arthurs annuncia l’assenza temporanea per curare un cancro alla prostata. Il chitarrista, tra i fondatori della band di Manchester, rassicura però i fan: l’obiettivo è tornare sul palco a novembre per i concerti in Sud America.
TUTTI I DETTAGLI: Chitarrista degli Oasis malato: Paul “Bonehead” Arthurs lascia il reunion tour, rientro atteso per le date sudamericane di novembre
Oasis, il chitarrista Bonehead lascia il reunion tour per curarsi dal cancro
Paul “Bonehead” Arthurs si ferma per curare un cancro alla prostata: salta le date asiatiche e australiane del reunion tour degli Oasis.Redazione (Atom Heart Magazine)
Stephen Miller Is Going for Broke: The White House aide equates opposition to Trump’s agenda with terrorism—and pushes for the use of state power to suppress it.
Stephen Miller Is Going for Broke
The White House aide equates opposition to Trump’s agenda with terrorism—and pushes for the use of state power to suppress it.Jonathan Chait (The Atlantic)
like this
Libraries Can’t Get Their Loaned Books Back Because of Trump’s Tariffs
The Trump administration’s tariff regime and the elimination of fee exemptions for items under $800 is limiting resource sharing between university libraries, trapping some books in foreign countries, and reversing long-held standards in academic cooperation.
“There are libraries that have our books that we've lent to them before all of this happened, and now they can't ship them back to us because their carrier either is flat out refusing to ship anything to the U.S., or they're citing not being able to handle the tariff situation,” Jessica Bower Relevo, associate director of resource sharing and reserves at Yale University Library, told me.
After Trump’s executive order ended the de minimis exemption, which allowed people to buy things internationally without paying tariffs if the items cost less than $800, we’ve written several stories about how the decision caused chaos over a wide variety of hobbies that rely on people buying things overseas, especially on Ebay, where many of those transactions take place.
Libraries that share their materials internationally are in a similar mess, partly because some countries’ mail services stopped shipments to and from the U.S. entirely, but the situation for them is arguably even more complicated because they’re not selling anything—they’re just lending books.
“It's not necessarily too expensive. It's that they don't have a mechanism in place to deal with the tariffs and how they're going to be applied,” Relevo said. “And I think that's true of U.S. shipping carriers as well. There’s a lot of confusion about how to handle this situation.”
“The tariffs have impacted interlibrary loans in various ways for different libraries,” Heather Evans, a librarian at RMIT University in Australia, told me in an email. “It has largely depended on their different procedures as to how much they have been affected. Some who use AusPost [Australia’s postal service] to post internationally have been more impacted and I've seen many libraries put a halt on borrowing to or from the US at all.” (AusPost suspended all shipments to the United States but plans to renew them on October 7).
Relevo told me that in some cases books are held up in customs indefinitely, or are “lost in warehouses” where they are held for no clear reason.
As Relevo explains it, libraries often provide people in foreign institutions books in their collections by giving them access to digitized materials, but some books are still only available in physical copies. These are not necessarily super rare or valuable books, but books that are only in print in certain countries. For example, a university library might have a specialized collection on a niche subject because it’s the focus area of a faculty member, a French university will obviously have a deeper collection of French literature, and some textbooks might only be published in some languages.
A librarian’s job is to give their community access to information, and international interlibrary loans extend that mission to other countries by having libraries work together. In the past, if an academic in the U.S. wanted access to a French university’s deep collection of French literature, they’d have to travel there. Today, academics can often ask that library to ship them the books they want. Relevo said this type of lending has always been useful, but became especially popular and important during COVID lockdowns, when many libraries were closed and international travel was limited.
“Interlibrary loans has been something that libraries have been able to do for a really long time, even back in the early 1900s,” Relevo said. “If we can't do that anymore and we're limiting what our users can access, because maybe they're only limited to what we have in our collection, then ultimately could hinder academic progress. Scholars have enjoyed for decades now the ability to basically get whatever they need for their research, to be very comprehensive in their literature reviews or the references that they need, or past research that's been done on that topic, because most libraries, especially academic libraries, do offer this service [...] If we can't do that anymore, or at least there's a barrier to doing that internationally, then researchers have to go back to old ways of doing things.”
The Trump administration upended this system of knowledge sharing and cooperation, making life even harder for academics in the U.S., who are already fleeing to foreign universities because they fear the government will censor their research.
The American Library Association (ALA) has a group dedicated to international interlibrary lending, called the International Interlibrary Loan (ILL) Committee, which is nested in the Sharing and Transforming Access to Resources Section (STARS) of the Reference and User Services Association (RUSA). Since Trump’s executive order and tariffs regime, the RUSA STARS International ILL Committee has produced a site dedicated to helping librarians navigate the new, unpredictable landscape.
In addition to explaining the basic facts of the tariffs and de minimis, the site also shares resources and “Tips & Tricks in Uncertain Times,” which encourages librarians to talk to partner libraries before lending or borrowing books, and to “be transparent and set realistic expectations with patrons.” The page also links to an online form that asks librarians to share any information they have about how different libraries are handling the elimination of de minimis in an attempt to crowd source a better understanding of the new international landscape.
“Let's say this library in Germany wanted to ship something to us,” Relevo said. “It sounds like the postal carriers just don't know how to even do that. They don’t know how to pass that tariff on to the library that's getting the material, there's just so much confusion on what you would even do if you even wanted to. So they're just saying, ‘No, we're not shipping to the U.S.’”
Relevo told me that one thing the resource sharing community has talked about a lot is how to label packages so customs agents know they are not [selling] goods to another country. Relevo said that some libraries have marked the value of books they’re lending as $0. Others have used specific codes to indicate the package isn’t a good that’s being bought or sold. But there’s not one method that has worked consistently across the board.
“It does technically have value, because it's a tangible item, and pretty much any tangible item is going to have some sort of value, but we're not selling it,” she said. “We're just letting that library borrow it and then we're going to get it back. But the way customs and tariffs work, it's more to do with buying and selling goods and library stuff isn't really factored into those laws [...] it's kind of a weird concept, especially when you live in a highly capitalized country.”
Relevo said that the last 10-15 years have been a very tumultuous time for libraries, not just because of tariffs, but because AI-generated content, the pandemic, and conservative organizations pressuring libraries to remove certain books from their collections.
“At the end of the day, us librarians just want to help people, so we're just trying to find the best ways to do that right now with the resources we have,” she said.
“What I would like the public to know about the situation is that their librarians as a group are very committed to doing the best we can for them and to finding the best options and ways to fulfill their requests and access needs. Please continue to ask us for what you need,” Evans said. “At the moment we would ask for a little extra patience, and perhaps understanding that we might not be able to get things as urgently for them if it involves the U.S., but we will do as we have always done and search for the fastest and most helpful way to obtain access to what they require.”
International ILL
A portal for current issues surrounding international interlibrary loan related to the U.S. Below this description are 6 clickable images that link to key resources.sites.google.com
How Germany outfitted half a million balconies with solar panels
How Germany outfitted half a million balconies with solar panels
Meet balkonkraftwerk, the simple technology putting solar power in the hands of renters and nudging Germany toward its clean energy goals.Akielly Hu (Grist)
like this
Regulations limit each system to just 800 watts, enough to power a small fridge or charge a laptop
What kind of clueless person wrote this. Whoever wrote this clearly has no idea how much 800W is in practice. Our fridge with an attached freezer (full size, 60cm wide, normal to large in Europe) never uses more than 70-90W, duty cycle is around 40%. So on average it uses 30W or so.
My gaming laptop is limited to 180W. Normally it uses much much less (50ish when actively used). My gaming desktop PC with 3 monitors uses 800W under full load, but that's with everything (monitors, amp/speaker, ...). Even with multiple PCs in normal (non gaming) use in the house, seeing over 800W isn't common. Or 10 laptops, not "a small laptop".
800W is enough to power our whole house unless we're cooking or taking a shower. I would argue in general, it will nullify noon-peak loads of an entire household, and whatever is left over gets added to the grid.
Or running HVAC or an air pump for heating.
That said 800w will be the nominal amount under near perfect conditions, 80%- 90% of the time it won't be anywhere near that.
We (m and f couple) lived of grid for 10 years on a 2kW solar system and batteries with ease no generator for backup but a gas oven, 1 * induction cook top, 2x pedestal fans and 1 x celing fans, toaster, kettle, microwave and a no electrical boost solar system. Mid size diesel truck we used minimamilay (lived way out in the bush growing our own stuff etc) We're naturally energy thrifty though. At S30° latitide, awesome for solar.
We've since moved to S41°, terrible for solar in winter (short days and thats the wet season). We have 8kW solar but are on grid (feed excess solar into the grid) and charge our mid sized e-truck (use minimially) off solar, and have a heat pump for heating, so we use more electrons but no fossil fuel.
As I'd replied to a sister comment of yours, I didn't even consider that the author could be talking about actually available power, so that's on me. I did go re-read it and I really don't think that's how it is meant though. I do think they are just ignorant on this point.
That being said, "balcony solar" isn't limited to 800 W in panels. It's limited to an 800 W inverter, but 2 kW for the panels. So you can have quite a bit more capacity in solar compared to the inverter, which also means that worse weather impacts you less. When you got a full sunny day, you can have the full 800 W for much longer, if not most of the day, as it'll essentially be limited further down the chain. On the other hand I do think the most common size actually installed is much closer to also only have 800-900 Wp (basically 2 panels), which is the most commonly offerend (and presumably sold) kit size.
We also have roughly 8 kWp installed, and obviously on cloudy or dark winter days we're an order of magnitude away from that number. There are days where we break 40 kWh in production, and there are days where we barely make it to 1 kWh. That low is very rare, even in winter or on dense, cloudy days, so I'd consider 4 kWh a more realistic minimum value. We have relatively detailed monitoring of most (relevant) consumers, which is why I have a somewhat good idea of how much our house consumes in practice. Before this full size installation, we had a 2 panel balcony solar "test setup" for quite a while. It was actually quite a (positive) surprise on how many days we essentially covered the majority of our daylight usage with these panels. Obviously not for the big-ticket consumers, but even a washer/dryer will be mostly covered.
What kind of clueless person wrote this. Whoever wrote this clearly has no idea how much 800W is in practice.
Average available power < installed power
Sorry but the first part is just incorrect. They are indeed simple, which is why they do feed back into the grid. Not feeding back would take effort and additional hardware. But you're not being paid for what is fed back into the grid, making it free energy for the electricity provider (see my last paragraph below).
To explain it a bit: electrically, the external grid and the grid in your home are simply connected (assuming the breakers are closed). If you use more than you produce, whatever is missing "flows in". If you produce more than what you're currently consuming, whatever is left over just flows out into the grid. Even if this if obviously simplified, this "just happens" with no effort required, but the amount that flows in or out is easy enough to measure (which is what the electricity meter does that sits between the big grid and the one in your house). If you want to actually make sure you don't feed back into the grid, you would constantly need to monitor if anything is flowing in our out, and compensate with reduced (or increased) production. Even full size solar installations can't do this with perfect precision, even if you tell them to: you can only react to the flow you see coming in/out, if you turn a large heater quickly on and off and on and off, it won't have time to react quickly enough.
For the longest time (until early 2023 I think), you had to ask permission from your electricity network operator (is that the correct term? "Netzbetreiber"), because they would only allow you to install it if you had at least a semi-modern electricity meter that won't turn backwards. Because balcony solar always feeds into the grid, you'd effectively be paid the same per kWh as what you're paying yourself. You would effectively use the grid as a infinitely large battery.
Suspension problem
Almost 500 anti-genocide activists arrested as Starmer government moves to ban protests outright
London’s Metropolitan Police arrested another 492 people over the weekend after a protest Saturday in Trafalgar Square, as the Starmer government accelerated its crackdown on opposition to the Gaza genocide.
The entirely peaceful protest was held to oppose the proscription of Palestine Action. It was organised by Defend Our Juries and attended by over 1,000 people. Of the arrests, 488 were for holding up signs declaring, “I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action”.
Almost 500 anti-genocide activists arrested as Starmer government moves to ban protests outright
Asked if this was a “dark step” to limit the fundamental right to protest, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood replied that that having a freedom “doesn’t mean you have to use it at every moment of every day”.World Socialist Web Site
like this
World News reshared this.
Apple and Samsung users in UK may be due share of £480m payout - BBC News
Apple and Samsung users in UK may be due share of £480m payout
Consumer group Which? is taking tech giant Qualcomm to the Competition Appeal Tribunal in London on Monday.Zoe Kleinman (BBC News)
Test Batch Setup with Wet Hops
My test batch setup is nearly complete (please also appreciate the "beautiful" tiles) and I tested it with a wet hop beer. As you can see, those were clearly at the upper end of their ripeness scale, but it was the only time I could manage to pick some at all due family & kids.
In they went in for a ~20 minutes 80 ˚C hop stand, during which my kitchen smelled a troubling lot of garlic and onions. By removing the bag with the hops, I stirred up the already settled trub, so I had to pour all hop debris & hot break into the minikeg along with the wort. Let's see what that does to the beer. I've overshot my OG quite a bit with the setup in the pictures, with a lot higher efficiency than predicted, only by stirring every now and then, so we're looking at an OG of 1.051 instead of 1.046.
Yesterday, after a week of fermentation under rising pressure, it was time for a gravity sample. It's fully attenuated already, and except a hint of some sharpness, I'm happy to report that we're apparently free of off-flavours. 😀 It came down do 1.008 (vs 1.010 predicted) , which leaves me with a 5.6 % ABV beer instead of 4.2 % with a lot less residual sweetness (US-05, you monster). Next time, I'll certainly mash hotter, and check the temperature with an external thermometer as well. I also wonder what a Kveik yeast would do to the result.
Here is the base recipe I intend to use for ongoing experiments with malts, yeasts & hops.
like this
Those beautoful cones! I wish I got some, but my vines did not flower this year at all.
Is that sous videt device? How simple is it to clean actually?
Totally forgot got mention it: These are actually wild hops! Foraged next to a rural road with not zero, but little traffic.
And yes, it's a sous vide stick. The one by Inkbird, which I got relatively cheaply. It sits in a hop tube so no grains can get into it.
After use, I instantly rinse it, then put it in a jar with clean water and let it sit there until I'm cleaning up everything. Then, I rinse it again. As it doesn't have to be sterile, I'm fine with this regime for the time being.
birdwing
in reply to Peter Link • • •like this
geneva_convenience e Rozaŭtuno like this.
krooklochurm
in reply to birdwing • • •redchert
in reply to birdwing • • •The Menemen
in reply to redchert • • •xc2215x
in reply to Peter Link • • •like this
warm likes this.
wildbus8979
in reply to xc2215x • • •School_Lunch
in reply to wildbus8979 • • •like this
warm likes this.
wildbus8979
in reply to School_Lunch • • •The original message makes it sounds like somehow before two years ago everything was fine with Gaza. That what Israel was doing in the 78 years prior to that was no issue. I want OP to expand on his or her thoughts.
Israel hasn't "gone too far" now... Israel was already going to far before that. If fast genocide was your redline as opposed to slower territorial expansion, seige warfare, and occupation... Yeah you're the reasonthis they've had free reign to take the situation to it's current inevitable consequence.
warm
in reply to wildbus8979 • • •You have to understand that not everyone was/is aware Israel's doings. The media in the west has always supported Israel, so you never heard anything negative about them. You cannot blame someone who could have had no prior knowledge of it and tell them they are the reason Israel had free reign, that's crazy talk. Anyone standing against what they are doing now or in the past is a good thing.
Did you even know until the last couple years? Until the attack happened?
If so, why weren't you being vocal and active about it? I could flip it on the head and say you are the reason Israel have had this free reign, because you knew and didn't tell us. See how dumb that sounds?
like this
warm e HeerlijkeDrop like this.
wildbus8979
in reply to warm • • •As a moderately informed person, yes I've been aware of this for decades.
And yes, thank you, I have been vocal and active since. How about you?
warm
in reply to wildbus8979 • • •School_Lunch
in reply to wildbus8979 • • •🍉 Albert 🍉
in reply to wildbus8979 • • •like this
warm likes this.
wildbus8979
in reply to 🍉 Albert 🍉 • • •krooklochurm
in reply to wildbus8979 • • •are you drunk?
I'm drunk.
apftwb
in reply to wildbus8979 • • •ayyy
in reply to wildbus8979 • • •wildbus8979
in reply to ayyy • • •- YouTube
www.youtube.comayyy
in reply to wildbus8979 • • •تحريرها كلها ممكن
in reply to xc2215x • • •loonsun
in reply to تحريرها كلها ممكن • • •like this
warm likes this.
krooklochurm
in reply to loonsun • • •Exit: I misread the comment. I subtract my wat. Thanks for the downvotes, it made me re-read the original comment
kbobabob
in reply to تحريرها كلها ممكن • • •redchert
in reply to تحريرها كلها ممكن • • •A lot are. Thats why they advocate for a two-state solution and not decolonization of israhell.
They just want to tune Palestinians out again.
marius
in reply to Peter Link • • •Narri N.
in reply to marius • • •jimmux
in reply to Narri N. • • •Narri N.
in reply to jimmux • • •Catoblepas
in reply to marius • • •U
in reply to Catoblepas • • •like this
Rozaŭtuno likes this.
lenz
in reply to Catoblepas • • •like this
Rozaŭtuno likes this.
wewbull
in reply to Catoblepas • • •Personally I find she falls in to the category of people who protest things we already know are bad. So I think all she does is self-promote and accomplish nothing. I don't disagree with her on any of the things she chooses to fight for, but I think she chooses the least effectual way to fight.
Great, she's shown the IDF are a bunch of cunts who are preventing aid reaching Gaza. We knew that. What's changed? IMO all she's done is move the camera lenses from Gazans onto her for a while.
Aqarius
in reply to Catoblepas • • •like this
Rozaŭtuno likes this.
trolololol
in reply to Peter Link • • •like this
Rozaŭtuno likes this.
redhydride
in reply to trolololol • • •While confirming that she and other Global Sumud Flotilla members were abused by Israeli forces who abducted and jailed them, Swedish climate and human rights activist Greta Thunberg on Monday implored humanity to focus on the genocide in Gaza as it enters its third year.
"I could talk for a very, very long time about our mistreatment and abuses in our imprisonment. Trust me, but that is not the story," Thunberg said during a press conference at Athens Eleftherios Venizelos International Airport in Greece, where she and other flotilla participants released by Israel were greeted by a cheering crowd.
"What happened here is that Israel, while continuing to worsen and escalate their genocide and mass destruction with genocidal intent, attempting to erase an entire population, an entire nation in front of our very eyes, they once again violated international law by preventing humanitarian aid from getting into Gaza while people are being starved," she continued.
"This genocide and other genocides are being enabled and fueled by our own governments, our institutions, our media, and companies. It is our responsibility to end that complicity... to use our privileges, our platforms, to take a stance against this, that is in every way unjustifiable," Thunberg asserted.
"I will never, ever comprehend how humans can be so evil that you would deliberately starve millions of people living trapped under an illegal siege as a continuation of decades and decades of suffocating oppression, apartheid, occupation," she added.
Thunberg's remarks came as Israeli forced continued their bombing and invasion of Gaza with the objective of conquering, occupying, and ethnically cleansing Palestinians from the strip. Israeli airstrikes—which have reportedly killed nearly 100 Palestinians over the past two days—continued despite US President Donald Trump's Friday exhortation to "immediately stop" bombing the embattled strip, citing Hamas' willingness to conditionally release the remaining Israeli and other hostages it has held since October 7, 2023.
Trump urged negotiators to "move fast" toward a ceasefire agreement ahead of Monday's indirect peace talks between Israel and Hamas in Egypt.
Since launching the assault and "complete siege" of Gaza following the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack, Israeli forces have killed at least 67,139 Palestinians, according to the Gaza Health Ministry—whose figures are widely believed to be a vast undercount. Most of those killed have been women and children.
Over 169,500 Palestinians have also been wounded in Gaza and thousands more are missing and presumed dead and buried beneath rubble. Most of Gaza's more than 2 million people have also been forcibly displaced, often multiple times, while hundreds of thousands of others are starving in an engineered famine that officials say has killed at least 460 people.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant are wanted by the International Criminal Court in The Hague for alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes in Gaza including murder and forced starvation. Just under two miles away at the International Court of Justice, tribunal members are weighing a genocide case against Israel brought by South Africa and supported by around two dozen nations and regional blocs.
Thunberg and more than 400 other Global Sumud Flotilla members were intercepted last week by Israeli forces in international waters before being taken to Israel and jailed. Thunberg told Swedish officials Saturday that she had been "subjected to harsh treatment in Israeli custody."
“She informed of dehydration," a Swedish Foreign Ministry email noted. "She has received insufficient amounts of both water and food. She also stated that she had developed rashes which she suspects were caused by bedbugs. She spoke of harsh treatment and said she had been sitting for long periods on hard surfaces.”
Turkish flotilla activist Ersin Çelik said he witnessed Israelis abusing Thunberg.
"They dragged little Greta by her hair before our eyes, beat her, and forced her to kiss the Israeli flag," Çelik said. "They did everything imaginable to her, as a warning to others."
Italian journalist and flotilla member Lorenzo D’Agostino said that Thunberg was “wrapped in the Israeli flag and paraded like a trophy.”
Abducted flotilla members said they were humiliated by Israelis, including National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who called them "terrorists." This, from a man who in 2007 was convicted of incitement to racism and supporting the Kahanist terrorist group Kach.
D'Agostino told CNN Monday that “we were shocked by the level of humiliation and gratuitous cruelty that these people used on us."
"The way we were treated was... pushing the mistreatment and the humiliation to the limit that they could afford,” he said, explaining that his captors “knew that they couldn’t harm us physically” if activists were from countries like Italy.
“I was sharing my cell with a Turkish citizen whose arm was broken and he was left without painkillers for two days.”
“People coming from countries that are not allied [with Israel] were harmed physically,” D'Agostino added. “I was sharing my cell with a Turkish citizen whose arm was broken and he was left without painkillers for two days.”
Israel's Foreign Ministry said Sunday that flotilla members' claims of abuse are "brazen lies," and that “all the detainees’ legal rights are fully upheld.”
As of Monday, Israel had deported 341 of the 479 detained flotilla activists. The remaining detainees are either awaiting deportation or, in some cases—including one Spanish woman who allegedly bit an Israeli medic during a forced medical examination at Ketziot Prison—are facing extended detention.
The alleged abuse of flotilla detainees pales in comparison to what Palestinian prisoners have allegedly endured at the hands of their Israeli captors. Former detainees and Israeli personnel have described beatings, rape and sexual torture by male and female soldiers, routine amputations due to constant shackling, burnings, electrocutions, attacks by dogs, ice-water dousings, denial of food and water, sleep deprivation, constant loud music, and other abuse.
The Israeli military has launched investigations into the deaths of dozens of detainees at the notorious Sde Teiman prison, including one who died after allegedly being sodomized with an electric baton.
Another group of boats is currently en route from Europe in another attempt to break Israel's blockade of Gaza.
"As more ships set sail for Gaza, we are likely to see a repeat of these events," Amnesty International said Monday, referring to the alleged abuse of Global Sumud Flotilla activists. "States must act now and make clear to Israel that its suffocating blockade and its ongoing genocide against Palestinians must end now."
like this
Rozaŭtuno likes this.
trolololol
in reply to redhydride • • •Thks kind stranger
The situation is more appaling than I thought
Ultraword
in reply to Peter Link • • •like this
Rozaŭtuno likes this.
bless
in reply to Ultraword • • •Garbagio
in reply to Ultraword • • •like this
Rozaŭtuno likes this.
ayyy
in reply to Ultraword • • •BrainInABox
in reply to Ultraword • • •extspace
in reply to Ultraword • • •robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]
in reply to Ultraword • • •altphoto
in reply to Peter Link • • •don't like this
geneva_convenience doesn't like this.
juliebean
in reply to altphoto • • •altphoto
in reply to juliebean • • •Yeah I'm confused.
1) Israel is evil now
2) bad people do or did live in Gaza but Innocent people should not be sacrificed.
3) ruzzia is an asshole doing the same to Ukraine.
But...there the ruzzians also think Israel is evil? At least the ones on that post. So I'm just confused.
تحريرها كلها ممكن
in reply to altphoto • • •loonsun
in reply to تحريرها كلها ممكن • • •Aceticon
in reply to loonsun • • •It's called being a Sociopath With No Morals.
Lots of those have been crawling out of the woodworks and taking sides entirely based on the politicians from their favored political force taking that side, showing us that they have no Principles and Morals of their own whatsoever or at least that their own inate sense of Good and Evil is so weak that even the mass murder of civilians (including thousands of babies and tens of thousands of children) is less important to them than following the leader of their political tribe.
Any half-way decent human being looks at this and judges it based on the character of the actions that are being commited, and giving that it includes purposefully murdering children (to the point of literally executing them using snipers) its so morally powerful that most people are unable to not have a reaction of revulsion, but Amoral Sociopaths have no emotional reaction to even the murder of children and hence couldn't care less about that aspect of this situation, hence will just not understand "what's all the fuss about it" and/or just mindlessly "follow the leader" on it since the part of a normal human being's character that would be shouting for them to defend the victims and stop the aggressors, does not exist in such people.
loonsun
in reply to Aceticon • • •altphoto
in reply to Aceticon • • •Yes exactly! That moral compass was just not there. I'm afraid of this stuff spreading. What a terrible future that would be if I could not expect sympathy from a passersby if I had just been hit by a car or fallen from a ladder.
Yet, even now, brown people are being kidnapped by the people who are supposed to defend our country... And nobody around defends from the kidnappers. We are afraid.
Aceticon
in reply to altphoto • • •In all fairness, I think it's a mix of what @loonsun@sh.itjust.works wrote and those people having a much weaker moral compass, rather than them being full-blown sociopaths with no moral compass.
Or to put it in another way, even in people with a moral compass, if its a weak one, tribalism can override and even swith it off, so that even when faced with outreageous displays of what a normal person would feel is Unacceptable Evil they'll take the side of Evil if their "tribe's chiefs" are taking that side.
I think this justifies even more strongly your fear that this stuff spreads - a lot more people than just Sociopaths have both weak moral compasses (we live in an age were Society deems Wealth as the measure of the greatness of a person, not moral behaviour) and tribalist thinking is both more prevalent and more subtle.
Certainly that would explain how in some countries like the US there is still a majority (or at least a large minority) of people justifying and even supporting (usually by parroting "Hamas, Hamas, Hamas") the mass murdering of Palestinian children by Israel.
altphoto
in reply to Aceticon • • •Aceticon
in reply to altphoto • • •In my experience in a small leftwing party were the old-generation decided as a group to pass power over to the newer generation some years ago, the kids by themselves are just manipulated by more recent propaganda instead of old propaganda (for example, the new young leadership, having grown up under Neoliberalism, saw many elements of it as "natural" and hence part of the "structure we have to work within", rather than seeing those as just political choices like the rest) and end up fucking shit up in new ways (that party has pretty much collapsed to non-existence since) rather than being wiser than the older ones.
Beware of fetishising youth.
As I see it, you need a mix of all kind of people of all ages and all origins influencing politics, rather than just people with a very narrow range of life experiences. Also regular change is important - dishonest people using positions of power for their own ends, entrenched control of power and unchallenged groupthing becoming unquestionable dogma, are all things that get swept away by regular change.
altphoto
in reply to تحريرها كلها ممكن • • •See! Exactly how I think! So I basically landed among crazy people in that other post. And clearly its a touchy subject because I just realized that my post here could be interpreted either way...but instead of interpreting it as I am a good moral person who thinks innocent gaza people should not be murdered and Ukrainian people should also not be murdered, I get down votes!
Or maybe I landed again among crazy people?
BodyBySisyphus [he/him]
in reply to altphoto • • •huf [he/him]
in reply to altphoto • • •ayyy
in reply to altphoto • • •1) Inebriated and confused
2) A victim of what seems to be a fediverse bug that has cropped up in the past 2 days or so where comments are ending up in completely the wrong place
3) the worst propaganda redirection bot ever programmed/hired
altphoto
in reply to ayyy • • •Those people were almost as confused as me with respect to Palestine/Gaza.
Me, I'm with Gretta. Israel is demolish the Gaza strip along with its people regardless of who they may be. It's just awful.
Meanwhile the people in the other post appear to also think that Israel should stop murdering innocent people.... But Russia should own Ukraine. WTF. Just confused.
redchert
in reply to altphoto • • •BrainInABox
in reply to altphoto • • •