Salta al contenuto principale







Kazakhstan Considers Criminal Liability for Mass Leaks of Personal Data


Kazakhstan is considering tightening legal responsibility for violations related to personal data protection. The Ministry of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Development has proposed introducing criminal liability for mass leaks of citizens’ personal data, along with a significant increase in administrative fines for failing to comply with information security requirements.


Archived version: archive.is/newest/timesca.com/…


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.



China AI coding breaks into U.S.


reshared this


in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

As expected. China's maintained that Palestinian statehood is a necessity and that the resistance must not and cannot be disarmed.
in reply to Cowbee [he/they]

In principle yes, but isn't a relatively neutral authority that includes countries like Russia and Qatar better than Israel being allowed to bomb Gazans as they like?
in reply to emergencyfood

There's really no such thing as "politically neutral." The US Empire and "Israel" have already been bombing Palestinians as they like, China's presence likely would not stop them. Palestinian statehood, and the permanent disollution of Israel, are both necessities for Palestinian liberation.


Principles and Execution of Beyond Visual Range Air Combat




Anyone familiar with LoRa Meshtastic stuff?


Been looking into some different hardware options, but don't quite know what the usability is like between different standalone devices versus using an app via bluetooth, etc. Some basic description of user experience might be useful.

Seems like some potentially useful tech to get experience with asap.

Questa voce è stata modificata (20 ore fa)




Alright, y'all were right, fuck Proton. This was the last straw for me.


For context, in my password manager I had tried formatting some of my entrees so that it would contain the usual username and password, but instead of creating whole new entrees for the security questions for the same account, I just added additional fields in the same entree in order to keep things a little more tidy.

I was not expecting that doing so would result in later being shaken down by Proton to pay even more money just to access the same few bytes of fucking text I had trusted them with. This is sleazy as fuck and I am dropping these idiots entirely.

in reply to AnimalsDream

Pretty sure the warning signs were apparent when the CEO submitted to Trump. it just his "personal beliefs" and not representative of the company. Right.
in reply to skozzii

Yeah, I tried to be charitable and assume they were just ignorant of how bad Trump is. I should have known better.



The TikTok deal is done - TikTok is now under new ownership in the US




Daily bunny no.3192 is tampering with the past


Bunnies are at the location of the time portal in "City At the Edge of Forever" (the Star Trek episode.) It is a donut-shaped glowing rock, with ruined columns strewn around it. One bunny has just run through the portal, head-first, as two other bunnies try to stop them.

Source: Bluesky



How to turn off Gemini in Gmail — and why you should | Proton


  • In your Gmail app, go to Settings.
  • Select your Gmail address.
  • Clear the Smart features checkbox.
  • Go to Google Workspace smart features.
  • Clear the checkboxes for: Smart features in Google Workspace, Smart features in other Google products
  • If you have more Gmail accounts, repeat these steps for each one.
  • Turning off Gemini in Gmail also disables basic, long-standing features like spellchecking, which predate AI assistants. This design choice discourages opting out and shows how valuable your AI-processed data is for Google.

This has finally gotten me to take steps to deGoogle my email, Fastmail trial underway.


in reply to ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

The joker would never.





Engineer at Elon Musk's xAI Departs After Spilling the Beans in Podcast Interview


So what exactly did Ghori reveal on Relentless? Well, he seemed to tip off the possibility that xAI has been skirting regulations and getting dubious permits when building data centers—specifically, its prized Colossus supercomputer in Memphis, Tennessee. “The lease for the land itself was actually technically temporary. It was the fastest way to get the permitting through and actually start building things,” he said. “I assume that it’ll be permanent at some point, but it’s a very short-term lease at the moment, technically, for all the data centers. It’s the fastest way to get things done.”

When asked how xAI has gone about getting those temporary leases, Ghori explained that they worked with local and state governments to get permits that allow companies to “modify this ground temporarily,” and said they are typically for things like carnivals.

Colossus was not without controversy already. The data center, which xAI brags only took 122 days to build, was powered by at least 35 methane gas turbines that the company reportedly didn’t have the permits to operate. Even the Donald Trump-staffed Environmental Protection Agency declared the turbines to be illegal. Those turbines, which were operating without permission, contributed to the significant amount of air pollution experienced by surrounding communities.

In addition to the indication of other potential legal end-arounds committed by xAI, Ghori also revealed some of the company’s internal operations, including relying significantly on AI agents to complete work. “Right now, we’re doing a big rebuild of our core production APIs. It’s being done by one person with like 20 agents,” he said. “And they’re very good, and they’re capable of doing it, and it’s working well,” though he later stated that the reliance on agents can lead to confusion. “Multiple times I’ve gotten a ping saying, ‘Hey, this guy on the org chart reports to you. Is he not in today or something?’ And it’s an AI. It’s a virtual employee.”







Cuban-born immigrant died of homicide at ICE facility in Texas, autopsy finds


cross-posted from: sh.itjust.works/post/53885900

A Cuban migrant held in solitary confinement at an immigration detention facility in Texas died after guards held him down and he stopped breathing, according to an autopsy report released Wednesday that ruled the death a homicide.

Geraldo Lunas Campos died Jan. 3 following an altercation with guards. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) originally said the 55-year-old father of four was attempting suicide and the staff tried to save him.

But a witness told The Associated Press last week that Lunas Campos was handcuffed as at least five guards held him down and one put an arm around his neck and squeezed until he was unconscious.

At least 30 people died in ICE custody last year, the highest level in two decades, agency figures show. In the first 10 days of 2026, four immigrants, including Lunas Campos, died while in federal immigration custody.



Chicago Jury Acquits Immigrant Accused in Bovino Murder-for-Hire Trial


Prosecutors said a Chicago carpenter had offered a bounty for killing Gregory Bovino, a Border Patrol official. Defense lawyers said he was just sharing a social media post.

Gregory Bovino, a senior tactical commander for the Border Patrol, has been the swaggering public face of President Trump’s chaotic round of immigration raids across the country. In the wake of an immigration sweep in Chicago last fall that ignited protests all over the city, federal officials accused a local Latino man of offering a bounty on Mr. Bovino’s life.

At the time, Mr. Bovino cited the case as evidence that the situation in American cities was out of control — “something out of a third world country,” he told Fox News. “It’s a war zone out there.”

But on Thursday, a Chicago jury acquitted the man accused of making the threats, the latest setback for the Justice Department, which has faltered in a number of attempts to prosecute cases related to Mr. Trump’s immigration policy.

MBFC\
Archive


in reply to silence7

Even if one were to completely set aside all environmental considerations, this is not going to benefit the US in terms of economic development, productivity or competitive advantage in the long term.

It's like betting on steam at exactly the wrong time.

in reply to xxce2AAb

If it weren't obvious yet... The entire Republican party are treasonous criminals beholden to either foreign enemies/oligarchs &/or billionaires, with Russia at the top. The main difference appears to be that the corrupt who make up the Dem majority are beholden to American billionaires and corporations first.

But as they say, a few bad apples spoil the bunch. The absolute corruption was always a certainty once domestic-first corruption was normalised.

in reply to silence7

Literally middle of an energy crisis, and they're cancelling the cheapest and quickest to finish projects available...


Are American tax dollars a fraud?


Recently heard someone trying to tell me that the government doesnt need a penny of our taxes, they just print the money they need and all tax is a complete scam. He is 100% in belief of this.

I hate taxes too (when they go towards wars), but is this actually true? He mostly gets his ideas from Facebook and x. So yeah.

in reply to bridgeenjoyer

Your friend is mostly correct but the printed money is for the billionaires not for peasants.


“Se Anche tu hai Perso la Voglia di Giocare ai Videogiochi…”


Con gran fortuna, così da rompere questo terrificante silenzio di 3 settimane che si è per qualche ragione formato sul fritto misto (…ops, scusate se sono così terribile…) è uscito fuori questo video del davidone vics, che può sicuramente fungere da buon spunto di riflessione… Filmino che, a differenza di molti suoi altri che invece […]

octospacc.altervista.org/2026/…


“Se Anche tu hai Perso la Voglia di Giocare ai Videogiochi…”


youtube.com/watch?v=Ge3at300IO…

Con gran fortuna, così da rompere questo terrificante silenzio di 3 settimane che si è per qualche ragione formato sul fritto misto (…ops, scusate se sono così terribile…) è uscito fuori questo video del davidone vics, che può sicuramente fungere da buon spunto di riflessione… Filmino che, a differenza di molti suoi altri che invece fanno ridere, fa infatti riflettere, sullo strambo fenomeno che ci accade, e che mi accade, per cui in certi periodi, la voglia di giocare ai videogiochi — altrimenti mezzi di intrattenimento e non di consumaggio, bensì di sfruttaggio del tempo, così benedetti e magici — semplicemente svanisce, nel vuoto, risucchiata, poof… 😐

Di questo inspiegabile fenomeno di sparizione — che a me ha recentemente ricolpito, e dalla fine del dicembre passato ad ancora adesso me la porto avanti, tant’è che è letteralmente da quasi un mese che non videogioco assolutamente a niente, inclusi giochini sul telefono, sorprendentemente — ne ho parlato qualche volta a livello personale, ultimamente, con notine sparse su Squaloctti, perché me ne sono accorta molto a ‘sto giro… chissà se perché stavolta questo “burnout” ha inspiegabilmente seguito un periodo di gaming intenso, facendomi passare in maniera quasi netta da tanto gaming a letteralmente zero gaming, o se perché in generale con le notine sto ultimamente facendo molta introspezione… ma, comunque sia: è assolutamente reale. 🤯

Davide qui nel video in realtà individua delle possibili cause per lui che non si allineano perfettamente a me, ma sono valide… e, in ogni caso, al di là delle differenze personali, la questione sembra essere abbastanza diffusa, e questo la rende ironicamente ancora più un mistero: Perché mai il fottuto gaming, che dovrebbe essere l’assoluto piacere (…vabbè, un passatempo divertente, ora manco a far finta che sia chissà che attività mistica), in certi momenti semplicemente non va? Al di là del semplice non avere tempo perché si lavora, o perché si ha voglia di spendere il tempo in attività diverse, come per me può essere programmare, perché mai in certi momenti c’è la voglia di fare qualcosa, si pensa al gaming come opzione… e però poi si arriva alla conclusione che, per il gaming, la voglia non c’è? 😨

La spiegazione che posso trovare per me, tanto banale quanto efficace, è quella delle iperfissazioni autistiche… magari per qualche settimana mi infogno pesantemente nel gaming, e poi no perché mi infogno di più in qualcos’altro, per poi tornare al gaming dopo altro tempo, e boh… e, nel mio caso, questo sarebbe coerente con altre mie attività, come appunto la programmazione, o anche la lettura (…è da tipo 2 mesi che non leggo, a proposito… e se questo mese neanche ho giocato… allora che cazzo sto facendo nelle mie giornate???)… però è evidente che c’è dell’altro sotto, altrimenti sicuramente questo non sarebbe un problema anche per gli allistici. Vix invece, dalla sua, mette il peso sulla confusione e sullo stress che causa lo stare appresso a tanti giochi insieme, a seguire il mercato, e al peso del backlog… tutti colpevoli plausibili, ma, anche qui, il quadro sembra incompleto. 🦷

La risposta a questo ennesimo mistero della natura umana, purtroppo, non la si avrà né con questo video, né con questo articolino, e probabilmente neanche i nostri posteri arriveranno ad una risposta… però, qualche consiglio per evitare questa cosa che io chiamo burnout, per quanto ridere faccia visto il contesto, ma a questo punto non lo so, dal signorotto ci arriva, e io condivido. Sicuramente, infatti, una trappola in cui si cade, a maggior ragione se si è creatori di contenuti o se si dà grande peso all’etichetta di gamer nella propria identità, è quella di dover seguire ogni cosa, di provare tutti i giochi, e di finirli, e di farlo velocemente… anche se magari si prova noia, anche se si vorrebbe andare più lentamente… e beh, la risposta a questo dilemma nel dilemma è semplice: è una trappola mentale che porta solo a giocare di meno nonostante i propri desideri, quindi va riconosciuta ed evitata… ed è una cosa che io già faccio, per dire… eppure il mistero rimane. Però dai: se non altro, almeno, con questa storia abbiamo capito che noi gamer seccati, marciscenti, non siamo soli. 😩

#burnout #davidevix #gaming #videogiochi




Greenland: A "Northern Front" of Inter-Imperialist Rivalry


cross-posted from: news.abolish.capital/post/2200…

By Nikos Mottas

The developments surrounding Greenland should not be treated as a diplomatic anomaly or as the product of individual political choices.

They are a concentrated expression of the contemporary phase of imperialism, in which the sharpening competition among capitalist powers drags strategic regions and smaller peoples into conflicts not of their own making.

The pressure exerted by the United States on Greenland and on Denmark — through political coercion, economic threats, and intensified military planning — is not a deviation from a supposedly “rules-based order” (aka “International Law”) but a manifestation of its real content. When strategic interests are at stake, imperialist diplomacy rapidly sheds legalistic language and reverts to open power relations. The Arctic, long considered marginal, is being transformed into a central field of competition as melting ice opens new transport routes and access to critical resources.

Greenland’s importance is therefore not social or humanitarian. It is geopolitical and economic. It is treated as a platform: for military infrastructure, surveillance systems, missile defence, control of Arctic sea lanes, and future exploitation of raw materials. In this framework, the needs and will of the population are secondary. What matters is position within the broader architecture of imperialist planning.

The ideological cover for these developments is the familiar invocation of “security threats,” usually linked to the activities of other major imperialist centers, namelyRussia and China. Such narratives are not neutral assessments of danger. They function as political tools that legitimise militarisation and strategic expansion. The Arctic is not being militarised because it is unsafe; it is presented as unsafe because it is being militarised.

At the core of the Greenland issue lies a mechanism analysed with particular precision by Vladimir Ilyich Lenin. In Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, he emphasised that once the world is fully divided among the major powers, imperialist conflict no longer concerns the seizure of “empty” spaces, but the struggle for redivision: “The characteristic feature of the period under review is the final partition of the globe — final, not in the sense that a re-partition is impossible; on the contrary, re-partitions are possible and inevitable — but in the sense that the colonial policy of the capitalist countries has completed the seizure of the unoccupied territories of our planet.”

This insight is decisive for understanding why pressure intensifies even among allies, why bargaining turns into coercion, and why Greenland becomes a focal point. It is not an ownerless territory entering history, but a claimed space whose strategic value grows under new conditions, provoking efforts to revise existing balances.

For this reason, the confrontation cannot be reduced to unilateral US actions or to frictions within NATO. It must be understood within the framework of inter-imperialist rivalry. The United States, the European Union, Russia, and China all pursue their own interests in the Arctic, shaped by the needs of monopolies, energy strategies, transport corridors, and military doctrines. Their antagonisms do not represent different “civilisations” or alternative paths of development; they are competing expressions of the same capitalist system.

This reality exposes the falseness of multipolar illusions. The emergence of multiple centres of power does not restrain imperialism; it sharpens its contradictions. Competition becomes more intense, alliances more fragile, and pressure on smaller territories more direct. Greenland is not threatened because imperialism is weakening, but because it is being reorganised through harsher rivalry over already divided space.

The reaction of European states confirms this. Denmark’s insistence on sovereignty, supported by the European Union, reflects the defence of a specific imperialist role within the transatlantic framework, not a principled defence of peoples’ rights. Institutions such as NATO do not transcend these contradictions; they manage them temporarily. As Lenin pointed out in his analysis of imperialist alliances:

“Peaceful alliances prepare the ground for wars and in their turn grow out of wars; the one conditions the other, producing alternating forms of peaceful and non-peaceful struggle on one and the same basis of imperialist connections and relations.”

Alliances, therefore, do not abolish rivalry. They regulate it until conditions change and conflicts sharpen again. Smaller peoples are not protected by such arrangements; they are integrated into them as variables within strategic calculations.

Greenland’s formal autonomy highlights another fundamental contradiction of imperialism. Legal self-government coexists with decisive external control over military presence, economic orientation, and long-term development. This gap between political form and material reality is not accidental. Under capitalism, sovereignty is often hollowed out while being formally preserved, allowing domination to operate behind institutional façades.

Climate change further intensifies these processes. The environmental destruction produced by capitalist development becomes a driver of new rivalries. Melting ice is treated not as a warning but as an opportunity: new routes, resources, and investment possibilities are incorporated into imperialist planning, while ecological and social costs are shifted onto peoples and future generations.

The Greenland standoff therefore offers lessons that extend far beyond the Arctic. It demonstrates how the language of “security” conceals class interests; how alliances among capitalist states are inherently unstable; how smaller peoples are subordinated to strategic competition; and how no imperialist centre can offer a path toward peace or genuine self-determination. The choice presented to peoples — alignment with one bloc or another — is a false one.

For communists, the task is not to interpret such developments through geopolitical sympathies, but to expose their system logic. Greenland shows with particular clarity that inter-imperialist competition is not an exception but the normal mode of operation of imperialism today. As long as capitalism prevails, strategic territories will be contested, militarisation will advance, and peoples’ interests will be subordinated to the needs of capital.

This understanding does not lead to calls for a “fairer” balance of power or a reformed alliance system. It leads to a sharper conclusion: the struggle against imperialist confrontations is inseparable from the struggle against the system that generates them. Only by breaking with the logic of capitalist competition can peoples secure real sovereignty, peace, and social development.

* Nikos Mottas is the Editor-in-Chief of In Defense of Communism.


From In Defense of Communism via This RSS Feed.


in reply to HaraldvonBlauzahn

...in generation of electricity. Most energy usage in the EU isn't electric and non-electric energy usage is almost exclusively fossil fuels.
Questa voce è stata modificata (16 ore fa)
in reply to Ice

Electricity is replacing fossil cars with electric ones and heating (heat pumps). As it has replaced the use of candles.
in reply to HaraldvonBlauzahn

Yes, although very slowly.

A mere 15% of new EU sold cars are BEVs, the average age of the fleet is 12 years, and electric heavy vehicles are still almost non-existent.

Meanwhile, central & southern Europe are still running on Fossil Gas despite heatpumps being around for ~50 years by now. The key issue is that the price of electricity has been far too high, and getting even higher in recent years.

Questa voce è stata modificata (9 ore fa)
in reply to Ice

Even so, baby steps are still steps. Just because not everything has been replaced doesn't mean it won't get replaced in the (far) future.


Australia proves that solar can be easy and widely adopted


Australia has high rates of adoption for rooftop solar. The interconnection is easy and permitting happens over night. And best of all, none of the fears associated with wide spread solar have materialized into real world problems.
in reply to Dippy

And best of all, none of the fears associated with wide spread solar have materialized into real world problems.


What were/are these fears?

in reply to maegul (he/they)

Unable to predict electricity use and generation on a large scale, leading to unstable electricity network (e.g. peak generation at 12 o clock while everynone is working).
in reply to AlmightyDoorman

This seems like a problem that can be solved now that everything is connected to the Internet and has a computer inside. Turn on the water boiler only when the price is less than 10ct/kw. Run aircon or heater only when it's cheap, and insulation will keep the temperature constant for half a day.
in reply to Dippy

Now if only I could afford a home to put a solar panel on.
in reply to Deceptichum

In Sweden, people – wealthy home owners – have gotten a lot of public financial assistance for mounting solar panels that would either way have paid for themselves in a matter of years, lowering electrical bills and raising house prices for the owners.

Overall that is a good thing, the pros of increased solar adoption outweigh the glaring inequity, but all the same it's hard to feel that it's a part of the general fuckery of governments competing on who can pamper the upper middle class the most. Sweden also subsidizes mortgage interest and has essentially abolished (hard-capped at a low.level) the property tax on private homes. And Sweden has in recent years given financial relief to households based on their electrical consumption, I.e. very little (or nothing if electric is added to the rent) to renters and most of the money going to people with big houses and year-round heated pools.

The discussion on equity needs to enter the debate on things like incentives for solar panels on private homes or grants for energy saving insulation. These are good things, but the money can't just stack up on top of other political favors to the wealthy. Less useful subsidies need to go. They need to replace other benefits.

in reply to redditmademedoit

I guess a big difference is in Australia we have a lot of land and a lot of sun. That money could be used to fund public solar farms and providing electricity for all, yet it and so many other social benefits go directly to the house owners.
in reply to Deceptichum

I don't know how it works in Australia, but a plus to subsidizing solar installation on roofs is that the home owner still has to co-invest for a considerable part, so you kinda get a leveraged build out, as opposed to the government directly building installations. But the balance between private and public good should be weighed carefully all the same.
in reply to Deceptichum

No, no. You START with the solar panel and work your way up.
in reply to dellish

I'm not into rocket appliances, but I would work down from the solar panels.


Switch from American tech companies !?


Here you can find reviewed, impressive and comprehensive European alternatives for digital products and apps if you wanna break from American (big) tech companies.

Have a look, you'll be impressed...

european-alternatives.eu/



Living Hell: The Israeli Prison System as a Network of Torture Camps


In July 2024, B'Tselem published Welcome to Hell, a report on the treatment of
Palestinian inmates in Israel's prison system and their confinement in torture camps
under inhuman conditions. The report presented testimonies from 55 Palestinian
men and women held in Israeli prisons and detention facilities since 7 October 2023.

The testimonies revealed the outcomes of a rushed process in which Israeli
prison facilities, both military and civilian, were transformed into a network of
camps dedicated to the abuse of inmates as policy. A space of this kind, in which
anyone who enters is condemned to deliberate, severe, and unrelenting pain and
suffering, functions de facto as a torture camp.

The present update reviews the situation of Palestinian prisoners held by Israel up
to the beginning of January 2026.
The transformation of Israeli prisons into torture camps for Palestinian inmates
must be understood in the context of Israel's coordinated onslaught on Palestinians
as a collective since October 2023, most prominently through the ongoing
genocide in Gaza. The foundations of the regime shaped since the State of Israel
was established, which are enabling the genocide in Gaza, rampant violence and
ethnic cleansing in the West Bank and the persecution of Palestinians citizens
of Israel, are also shaping the treatment of prisoners. First and foremost among
them is the dehumanization of Palestinians as a group and the employment of
extreme violence against them (for further reading, see B'Tselem July 2025 report
Our Genocide).

This update revisits the categories of abuse listed in the original report, using
them to assess the current situation and any new developments. It is based on
21 testimonies given to B'Tselem by Palestinians released under the agreement
between Israel and Hamas in October 2025 or in the months preceding it. Many
released prisoners are too afraid to give testimony, as – according to the witnesses
we spoke to – Israeli authorities threatened to re-arrest anyone who shared
information about their experiences in prison. The threats were issued both before
and after the prisoners were released, illustrating how Israel uses deprivation of
liberty as a key means of oppressing Palestinians.

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 giorno fa)


1. Februar 2026, 12:00:00 CET - GMT+1 - Rostocker Straße 32, 10553 Berlin, Germany, 32 Rostocker Straße (Berlin)
Feb 1
DI.DAY im Stadtschloss Moabit
Dom 12:00 - 16:00
c-base

Let`s DID it!

Am ersten Sonntag des Monats auf die gute Seite wechseln!

Wir unterstützen dich dabei, deine digitale Autonomie zurückzugewinnen. Gemeinsam und Schritt für Schritt. Ob von X zu Mastodon, von Google Chrome zu Firefox – wir helfen dir beim Wechsel!

Warum nicht einen Email-Dienst mit mehr Privatsphäre probieren? Oder magst du bei einem Kaffee einfach mehr über andere digitale Alternativen erfahren, die unsere Demokratie stärken statt sie zu zerstören? Alternativen, die uns allen eine nachhaltige und selbstbestimmte Teilhabe sichern?

Dann lass uns zusammen loslegen!

Am

Sonntag, 01. Februar 2026

von 12 bis 16 Uhr

freuen wir uns auf dich im

Stadtschloss Moabit

Rostocker Str. 32b, im EG.

Es gibt Tee, Kaffee, Snacks und natürlich Cookies. Lasst uns etwas für unsere digitale Unabhängigkeit tun! Kostenlos, auch ohne Vorkenntnisse. Bring aber gern deine Endgeräte mit.

Der Zugang und der Raum sind barrierefrei.

Eine gemeinsame Aktion von Moabiter Ratschlag e.V. (Stadtschloss Moabit), Digital-Zebra (VÖBB), Topio, dem Hackspace c-base und dem kleindatenverein.

Weitere Informationen: di.day

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 giorno fa)




Tourists avoid the US


🇬🇧 English Summary

Dutch travel agencies report a significant drop—around 20%—in bookings to the United States since Donald Trump’s inauguration. The decline mainly affects longer round trips, while short city trips (e.g., New York, Chicago) remain relatively stable.

Travellers cite:
- Discomfort with Trump’s policies
- Fear of stricter immigration controls, including concerns about being asked to show social‑media accounts
- A general negative sentiment toward the U.S. political climate

As a result:
- Alternative destinations such as Canada, Asia, Egypt, Australia, and New Zealand are becoming more popular.
- Some agencies say the “Trump effect” is pushing travellers toward other long‑haul destinations.
- Cheap flights keep short U.S. city trips somewhat stable, but longer tours have dropped sharply.

in reply to cpo

We definitely noticed the cheap tickets right now. We're working on flying more of our kids out of the US to Europe to emigrate permanently as they finish school. It's a great time to fly out.


in reply to Cevilia (she/they/…)

What project is this? I have never seen a reaction like that, if anything I've had the opposite, where I said it was a minor inconvenience and the maintainer said "what do you mean 'minor'? This is terrible!"
Questa voce è stata modificata (1 giorno fa)


Warren Zevon — The Wind (2003)


Questo è il testamento musicale di Warren, morto poco prima della pubblicazione del disco (24 gennaio 1947–7 settembre 2003). Colpito da un male incurabile, il musicista californiano ha voluto a tutti i costi questo album, e se pur stanco, affaticato dalla malattia, ha lavorato duramente con profonda dignità fino alla completa registrazione... Leggi e ascolta...


Warren Zevon — The Wind (2003)


immagine

Questo è il testamento musicale di Warren, morto poco prima della pubblicazione del disco (24 gennaio 1947–7 settembre 2003). Colpito da un male incurabile, il musicista californiano ha voluto a tutti i costi questo album, e se pur stanco, affaticato dalla malattia, ha lavorato duramente con profonda dignità fino alla completa registrazione. Attorniato da un numero incredibile di amici e musicisti, ci ha consegnato uno dei dischi più belli ed ispirati della sua trentennale carriera... silvanobottaro.it/archives/399…


Ascolta il disco: album.link/s/4nFHFjMCqWuFXyzuX…


HomeIdentità DigitaleSono su: Mastodon.uno - Pixelfed - Feddit






A government can choose to investigate the killing of a protester − or choose to blame the victim and pin it all on ‘domestic terrorism’


National Security Presidential Memorandum 7, issued by the Trump administration in September 2025, relies on logic from the lady and the fly. It frames “domestic terrorism” and “organized political violence” as national security crises. It tells federal agencies to work together to investigate and stop suspected threats, a framework that enlarges the set of things the state can plausibly treat as suspect, including the freedoms of association and belief.

The language in the memorandum affirms legitimate counterterrorism work while leaving room to treat political dissent as out of bounds. But the First Amendment protects protest speech.

Still, if the language of the Trump memo is somewhat abstract, Minneapolis has provided a brutally concrete example.


...

The state has two choices when a death occurs that’s politically dangerous to the government.

It can investigate the killing with transparency and center the victim’s rights alongside public accountability as organizing principles. Or it can treat the killing as an opportunity to put the victim on trial in the court of public legitimacy.

The second choice avoids holding government accountable, shifts conversation toward the target’s supposed behavior and character, and expands the blame to include the people who loved and stood with the dead.

When this happens, the government does not have to win in court. It only has to keep the stigma circulating by asserting that a particular speaker undermines respect for elected officials. Indeed, that’s one of the reasons Trump offered for Good’s shooting by the ICE officer: “At a very minimum, that woman was very, very disrespectful to law enforcement,” he told reporters.

The United States has been here before. Around EG: During? World War I, the U.S. Supreme Court issued several free speech decisions in cases mostly remembered as disputes over protest and draft resistance. But their underlying engine was the swallow-a-fly theory. Opposing the war might ruin the nation, so political dissidents had to be stopped, and the court affirmed the government’s right to silence strident speakers.