As #Signal has had severe problems recently due to its centralised nature, here are some decentralised libre alternatives with Fediverse accounts:
➡️ @snikket_im - Initiative to give XMPP a consistent look and feel on instances and apps, to make it more attractive to new users
➡️ @xmpp - XMPP standards foundation
➡️ @delta - Decentralised messaging through email
➡️ @matrix - Best known for the Element client
➡️ @briar - Peer-to-peer encrypted messaging
➡️ @Jami - Peer-to-peer Skype alternative
➡️ @snikket_im - Initiative to give XMPP a consistent look and feel on instances and apps, to make it more attractive to new users
➡️ @xmpp - XMPP standards foundation
➡️ @delta - Decentralised messaging through email
➡️ @matrix - Best known for the Element client
➡️ @briar - Peer-to-peer encrypted messaging
➡️ @Jami - Peer-to-peer Skype alternative
Sabrina Web likes this.
reshared this
:debian: 𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚊 :t_blink:
in reply to FediFollows has moved! • • •FediFollows has moved!
Unknown parent • • •https://mstdn.social/@feditips/105317854827203241
and
https://mstdn.social/@feditips/105323302581488899
FediTips (@feditips@mstdn.social)
Mastodon 🐘FediFollows has moved!
Unknown parent • • •With decentralised networks, if something goes wrong you can move to another instance.
Even in a worst case scenario, on decentralised networks you can start a new account on a different instance without leaving the network. This "new instance, same network" option does not exist on centralised networks.
Suguru Hirahara
in reply to FediFollows has moved! • • •The pain point is that you would have to persuade your non-tech savvy friends with the idea having multiple channels which must be unfamiliar for them.
Chuso Pérez
in reply to FediFollows has moved! • • •creek
in reply to FediFollows has moved! • • •Vinz Clortho
in reply to FediFollows has moved! • • •Pixelflowers
in reply to FediFollows has moved! • • •Signal and the security it provides mean the difference between freedom or jail to some people.
FediFollows has moved!
in reply to Pixelflowers • • •We will end up in trouble if we rely on centralised platforms, and we can only get off centralised platforms by building decentralised ones.
Signal's behaviour has been somewhat strange and inexplicable, for example continuing to require phone numbers despite promising many years ago that people could use usernames instead. Their sudden introduction of cryptocurrency was worrying to many too.
clacke: inhibited exhausted pixie dream boy 🇸🇪🇭🇰💙💛 likes this.
Pixelflowers
in reply to FediFollows has moved! • • •FediFollows has moved!
in reply to Pixelflowers • • •The people running them can become corrupted, or misguided, or coerced, or they might sell out to an untrustworthy corporation, and if that happens the users are locked in by the network effect.
This is what happened to Whatsapp, for example.
Signal is owned by the Signal Foundation. The Signal Foundation is headed by the billionaire Brian Acton. Brian Acton created Whatsapp, then sold it to Facebook.
This is not very reassuring.
like this
Sabrina Web e clacke: inhibited exhausted pixie dream boy 🇸🇪🇭🇰💙💛 like this.
Sabrina Web
in reply to FediFollows has moved! • •clacke: inhibited exhausted pixie dream boy 🇸🇪🇭🇰💙💛 likes this.
Daniel Gomes
in reply to FediFollows has moved! • • •FediFollows has moved!
in reply to Daniel Gomes • • •But for those who have already switched to Signal (at least to some extent), maybe they could work on switching to one of the options above.
The options above are potentially more sustainable than Signal because they are decentralised, so if something goes wrong with a provider they can switch providers without leaving the network.
nexeq
in reply to FediFollows has moved! • • •@snikket_im@xmpp@delta@matrix@briar@Jami
j@mastodon
in reply to FediFollows has moved! • • •Perfect line up!