Call for #OpenPeerReview: commentbfp.sp.unipi.it/maria-c…
We talk a lot about how research is evaluated. But we do not always ask who is entitled to evaluate research and what is the legitimacy (even from the perspective of #openscience) of a system in which evaluation is in the hands of bureaucrats, or government-appointed researchers acting with bureaucratic power. The origin of the question is Italian, but its scope is global.
To contribute see the gray box at the bottom of commentbfp.sp.unipi.it
We talk a lot about how research is evaluated. But we do not always ask who is entitled to evaluate research and what is the legitimacy (even from the perspective of #openscience) of a system in which evaluation is in the hands of bureaucrats, or government-appointed researchers acting with bureaucratic power. The origin of the question is Italian, but its scope is global.
To contribute see the gray box at the bottom of commentbfp.sp.unipi.it
Maria Chiara Pievatolo, The Scale and the Sword: Science, State and Research Evaluation | Bollettino telematico di filosofia politica
PDF 2017-2024 Presentation for English-speaking readers and abstract If this were only a domestic issue, the fact that some of the international literature on research assessment in Italy appears misleading to many Italian-speaking researchers would…commentbfp.sp.unipi.it
reshared this
Maria Chiara Pievatolo
in reply to Maria Chiara Pievatolo • • •Ranking di riviste e fiducia nei database proprietari – Open Science @Unimi
openscience.unimi.itreshared this
macfranc, Shamar e Lucio Marinelli reshared this.