Salta al contenuto principale


BIG NEWS: Pawoo.net, the world's 2nd biggest Mastodon instance, has just been acquired.

The entity acquiring them is the Mask Group, a business that also runs mstdn.jp and mastodon.cloud. They are also active in the so-called "Web 3.0" space.

If you haven't heard of pawoo.net, it's because many instances have de-federated from it.

finance.yahoo.com/news/mask-ne…

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 anni fa)
in reply to Chris Trottier

huh wtf so the two largest japanese fediverse entities are merging into one now :/
in reply to @pineywoozle ‘s #3WordNote

Parola filtrata: nsfw

in reply to GaggiX

@GaggiX @Pineywoozle @gisiger
It's strange that the report doesn't even mention that it's defederated by many instances for sharing paedophilic content. Seems like a bizarre purchasing decision too.
in reply to GaggiX

@GaggiX @Pineywoozle @gisiger
It's not about whether we like such content or not. If the content is illegal where the instance is operating, moderators have an obligation to block it as far as possible.
in reply to GaggiX

@GaggiX @ERDonnachie @gisiger Nobody defederated a large instance because they don’t “like” the content. It had to have risen to a much higher threshold.
in reply to GaggiX

@GaggiX @ERDonnachie @gisiger Yeah we don’t have the same standards. Lolicon is massively offensive and dangerous to young girls, it’s not something “some people just don’t like”
in reply to @pineywoozle ‘s #3WordNote

@Pineywoozle @ERDonnachie @gisiger It is always the same "violent video games make people violent" story, at the end yeah it's just "some people don't like it"
in reply to GaggiX

@GaggiX @Pineywoozle @ERDonnachie @gisiger I go to sleep, and then when I wake up, people are debating the merits of lolicon? That doesn't fly by me.
in reply to Chris Trottier

@GaggiX @Pineywoozle @ERDonnachie Yeah, please remove me from this thread, I don't care about lolicon at all. I just wanted to know, why that japanese instance got defederated :blobcatshrug:
in reply to Chris Trottier

Like it or not, it should no longer be assumed that "volunteers" are running your instances.

The Mask Group, which now runs three large instances "has raised over US$50 million from private and institutional backers"—their words not mine.

Aral Balkan reshared this.

in reply to Chris Trottier

What is the perceived revenue stream that justifies such an investment?

prnewswire.com/news-releases/m…

in reply to Chris Trottier

@bullivant They may try to copy what Truth Social is doing & insert ads within people’s timelines.

Even though there are corporate-owned instances, it is particularly jarring that a corporate overlord assimilates instances now.

But I think we will see more of this for one reason: Twitter is dying, so companies are trying to “buy the next Twitter” instead of building one.

in reply to Darnell Clayton

@darnell @bullivant And they'd be mad not to build on the Fediverse. The hardest part about building any social network is validating the network effect. ActivityPub solves that problem.
in reply to Chris Trottier

@bullivant I agree. We might see corporations target #Pixelfed instances next.

Also, #Mastodon admins are going to receive lucrative offers soon, & some might sell if they are unable to pay operational costs for their servers.

It will become critical for members to support their local servers.

in reply to Darnell Clayton

@darnell @bullivant I worry a bit about the 'inserting adverts'. It's pretty easy to insert adverts into someone's timeline when you're running the server they use, and maybe that's a fair enough trade off for those users. (I'd hate it.)

But we've seen stupid decisions before, and if they're running the server it'd be a small conceptual step for them to insert adverts into remote users timelines by boosting the adverts on behalf of their users. And that'd be nasty.

in reply to Geoff

@OpinionatedGeek @darnell @bullivant
Putting ads into the federation would get them de-feded in a lot of places. Silenced in nearly all, probably.

I actually don't have much of a problem with ad supported instances (beyond my usual problem with ad tech on the web). It's probably inevitable, if we're honest. Where are the tens (hundreds?) of millions going to come from if the Fediverse really takes off?

Volunteers? Can't scale that big. Patreon? Maaaybe.

in reply to John Conway

@OpinionatedGeek @darnell @bullivant I'd like to see some subscription instances, attached to custom apps actually. Pay your $1-3 a month, get a nice app, address, and professional moderation. Seems like a fair deal all round.
in reply to John Conway

@john @OpinionatedGeek @bullivant Some instances already do this.

@aurynn & @JohanEmpa charge their members for access which is wise in my honest opinion.

in reply to John Conway

@john @OpinionatedGeek @bullivant I loathe ads on any platform. It's why I stopped watching television years ago & chose to pay to stream content instead.
in reply to Darnell Clayton

@darnell @OpinionatedGeek @bullivant
Oh yeah, me too, and I'm glad I don't have to have them on Mastodon.

But realistically, most people just don't seem to mind the tradeoff. Pragmatically, I think we should prevent the excesses of the ad-tech industry with legislation, rather than try to prevent all ads.

in reply to Chris Trottier

@bullivant But isn’t the point of grabbing land ultimately to secure the revenue it will yield?

What is the pathway to profitability here?

in reply to Chris Trottier

Those who control information, control the population. They may or may not insert ads, but we've just seen what happens when someone whose only interest is profit and power owns social media, who they let in and what they allow/don't allow to exist and prosper in 'their' social media platform.

@bullivant

in reply to Chris Trottier

There's going to be a massive land grab of all these big instances. There will be lots of merging and acquiring too.

My advice is that you all become *very* aware of who owns your instance and why.

Get to know your admins—make sure their values align with your own.

If you don't want to put your social media life in the hands of strangers, then self-host your own instance.

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 anni fa)
in reply to Marc Véron

@mveron Caveat: if they're a non-profit or a volunteer.

Give no donations to instances run by for-profits.

in reply to Chris Trottier

@mveron new here. What's an example of an instance being run for-profit? I find it hard to imagine how you could monetize such a thing.
in reply to Chris Trottier

@byte @mveron

I guess Vivaldi is because it's available as part of the subscription so it could well be a loss leader feature. I don't see a financial relationship with mastodon.cloud or its owners, I've no idea about twit.

Would you say the same about masto.host or any other instance hosting company?

in reply to Chris Trottier

I imagine that as Mastodon now is in the spotlight as a potential Twitter replacement, certain entities will see an opportunity to carve out power, profit, and influence by acquiring instances and centralising power.

#mastodon #socialmedia #technology

in reply to Chris Trottier

To everyone using mastodon.cloud and mstdn.jp: remember, you're not locked into those instances.

If you want, you can migrate elsewhere.

This is not Twitter—you have a choice regarding where your home will be on the Fediverse.

Aral Balkan reshared this.

in reply to Chris Trottier

A warning: there's going to be a concerted effort to re-centralize the Fediverse.

As we've just seen with the acquisition of pawoo.net, that's already happening.

What are you going to do to thwart this trend?

reshared this

in reply to Chris Trottier

As much as I agree w/ you, such an effort will fail. We can all vote w/ our feet by walking away to other instances. And if such 're-centralized' instances get blocked, the lose the momentum of network effect fairly fast.
in reply to Michael Gisiger

@gisiger Yes, that's one failsafe mechanism for the Fediverse. However, people need to care enough about de-centralization.
in reply to Chris Trottier

if you want people to care, you have to make it easy for them to discover.

My favorite idea is forming consortia of Mastodon admins with similar values to actively de-federate bad instances.

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 anni fa)
in reply to Chris Trottier

@gisiger I'd say that for most, ease of communication is higher priority than decentralization. If the Fediverse continues to scale up, I fully expect that some dominant, but not exclusive, commercial sites that provide an attractive user experience will emerge, just as happened with email. Other instances can respond to that in various ways, but I don't expect that defederating them on principle would work any better than refusing to exchange email with AOL or gmail would have.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Does it matter? If the underlying protocols are architected for federation and easy migration then any instances that go bad won't last long.
I do see a model like SMTP e-mail becoming a thing where technically anyone can federate, but it becomes increasingly hard for non well-resourced players to provide the necessary abuse management to play effectively.
in reply to Rob Pickering

The instances that have gone bad have lasted for a very long time.

Technology does not replace human moderation.

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 anni fa)
in reply to Chris Trottier

If the actions of the operators cause users any problems then they are two button presses away from migrating to another instance. The Musk problem couldn't arise here, provided acquirers don't do deeply evil things like defeating the migration mechanism. Someone *will* try it and the community response will define how the ecosystem eventually goes.
in reply to Rob Pickering

@rob With all do respect, the Musk problem can not only happen on Mastodon, it has happened.

You might want to look into a few more instances.

in reply to Chris Trottier

Everything in my power to end capitalism because capitalism ruins everything
in reply to Chris Trottier

I don't think they will be able to re-centralize me, because I am a self-hosted holdout and remaining independent from BigTech BS was always my goal.

The main thing to watch out for is not some big instance but what happens to the protocol. The re-centralizers will try to manoevre such that they control the protocol, both through standards organizations and as a defacto implementation. So be very resistant to any protocol changes which create dependence on a single server or a single company. They will always claim that the company is benevolent and the people initially in charge will always be friendly individuals with good intentions who then later get replaced.

in reply to Chris Trottier

If they could buy those instances, that's also because they were for sale.

Migration is gonna be difficult for Japanese users. Who's going to run a new Japanese instance that could welcome ~1.2 million users? (if there's really 1.2m active users, Pawoo kind of cheated on this)

Also they all run on an obsolete version of Mastodon (namely 3.3 or 3.4) so no automatic migration.
Pawoo is even a fork that was heavily patched at a time were a lot of features weren't available. They were #1 in creating new features when they were owned by Pixiv.

in reply to Chris Trottier

So, last time I checked my server had approx. 40 Accounts. And I am more and more content with that fact. When I chose it, it was a random pick, because it was a regional server. Now I understand, that the size is just perfect for me 😄
in reply to Chris Trottier

I run my own private instance. But admittedly, if someone gives me a ton of money for it, wel....
in reply to Chris Trottier

The biggest issue with federation is trust. Unless smaller instances market themselves as trustworthy, barely any new users will pick them. Many small instance admin teams are anonymous random people. This doesn't help. The biggest instances benefit from "everyone I know has picked them, so can't be bad" and "too big to fail". We as users have no real way to influence the masses and as bad as it makes me feel saying it, we need ... "influencers" for that.
in reply to Tobias Horvath

@tobyx The way to fix this is to build a culture that values de-centralization. The notion of self-hosting and administrating your own instance should be normalized. We should embrace small.
in reply to Chris Trottier

As you've posted, big money is coming in, acquiring instances already. But I think there's also going to be smaller players, funded organizations with boards instead of anonymous admins that promise a culture that people can subscribe to. Made sustainable by people paying for a service—just a small amount.

Just like with email where Gmail dominates, but it doesn't bother me too much. There's a healthy ecosystem for email out there for people who care and support smaller companies.

in reply to Chris Trottier

Oh and I think many people will stay far away from running their own instances because social media is such a controversial topic in many legislations. The legal ramifications are insane.
in reply to Chris Trottier

@tobyx we should find ways to monetize them like miners. Otherways they will eat us. There are no financial incentives to run own instance and now there is one - I potentially could be bouth by big fish.

without some kind of money it's a voluntary lose deal.

And why they should do it for free? Don't they deserve salary? Why they should work another job, aren't they instance valuable?

Or we want them to work for some corporation and managing instance on work-free hours?

in reply to Chris Trottier

@tobyx Make no mistake, if/when 750m Twitter refugees sign into Mastodon, *those* will form the culture here more than anybody who's been around since 2017. Mastodon's Eternal September might only just have begun.
in reply to Chris Trottier

@tobyx
I agree with your proposition.
I guess that one of the key points is how to bring to the non techie people a way to self-hosting and admin their own instance in a easy/no-pain way.
in reply to Chris Trottier

@tobyx self-hosting is complex and most people do not have the requisite security skills to ensure the safety of themselves or any other users. If we get to the point of every person being represented by their own instance, everyone now has to moderate every instance.
I don't have answers, but I'm not convinced "just host your own" is the solution.
in reply to Leigh Garland

@toychicken @tobyx Right now, self-hosting has a big barrier to entry. But the future can change, and we should work towards that better future.

Either way, self-hosting should be encouraged. If you have the knowledge and means, do it!

in reply to Chris Trottier

@tobyx I agree in terms of it being desirable to become easier, but the problem remains. As a self-hoster you're responsible for accepting / declining every single connection to you from the rest of the Fediverse. As a connection / follow request is simply a ping to an API, it's trivial to be swamped with requests of varying legitimacy. AFAIK Mastodon software does not validate if the data in the request comes from a 'real' instance. Hopefully this can be mitigated.
in reply to Leigh Garland

@toychicken @tobyx If you're concerned about who you're taking requests from, just connect with specific trusted instances on a whitelist. Pleroma makes this pretty straightforward.
in reply to Chris Trottier

@tobyx the problem doesn't go away though. Just shifting outside the realm of your software. I guess this is ultimately the Achilles heel of federation. How do you know who to trust?
I appreciate this discussion though, thank you.
in reply to Leigh Garland

@toychicken @tobyx Honestly, I look at all these discussions as opportunities -- not merely barriers.
in reply to Chris Trottier

@tobyx I feel it's pretty absurd to expect the average user to understand federation - let alone run an instance. Most users don't even understand how e-mail works, nor do they care about decentralization. The risk lies in the adopt > extend principle. Users are drawn by simplicity and features. Large corps can fund instance specific features which will lead towards centralization. I am not sure there is currently a good response to this threat, other than awareness.
in reply to Steve🏳️‍🌈

@gaysteve @tobyx There is no such thing as an "average user" -- just individuals with specific pains that need alleviating.

Ostensibly, the specific pain that many are feeling right now is the monopolization of social media.

How do we alleviate this?

in reply to Chris Trottier

@tobyx I would respectfully disagree. Facebook currently has 266M active users; Twitter ~240M: the entire fediverse is <10M users. At this time, Mastodon selects for the subset of users which care about decentralization, but the users corps are counting on obtaining don't care. The corps are hoping for a 5%-10% shift of social-media users toward the fediverse, as both Facebook and Twitter are currently vulnerable. It's hard to imagine the full implications of a 10M+ user instance
in reply to Chris Trottier

@tobyx

"The notion of self-hosting and administrating your own instance should be normalized. We should embrace small."

I'm a trendsetter! (-;

in reply to Chris Trottier

Everyone needs to be aware that Mask Group trades a crypto token.

This same entity now owns pawoo.net, mstdn.jo, and mastodon.cloud.

coindesk.com/business/2022/12/…

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 anni fa)

reshared this

in reply to Chris Trottier

they seem to have quite a few things going on around so-called Web 3.0:-

we.mask.io/t/building-the-brid…

in reply to Chris Trottier

D'ya notice how it's only one syllable away from that sociopath's surname?
in reply to Chris Trottier

Its frustrating that it’s a crypto entity, but “corporate” Mastodon instances are a positive signal IMO.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Oh, gross, and they want to get crypto all over our Fediverse.

> The Pawoo acquisition marks another milestone of the Mask team towards the building of a decentralized social network and a free, open internet

A “free, open internet” of crypto bros. Sounds like a quick refreshing skinny dip in a sewage lagoon.

in reply to Chris Trottier

So it's starting and I feel a bit dejected because it was just a matter of time. The lure of big money for an instance can be too much for an admin to say no.
in reply to Chris Trottier

genuine question: why should I care? I may be being naive but I don't see the connection.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Yes, but... I do not know the vocabulary has caught up to the nuances. Pawoo.net has been defederated by many of the most popular Mastodon instances because it is the home of lots of Manga that depicts CSAM.

I won't dive into that debate BUT it is important to differentiate federated and defederated instances and/or looking at this as building an alternative federation. If nothing else, some active daily user counts do not count Pawoo.

in reply to Chris Trottier

I still don’t understand why this is a bad thing. And you didn’t really do much to try and make a case for that anyway. So I don’t really know what the point is.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Just checked their site and it's all about web3 bullshit :sad_cat:

Not something most of the Fediverse is interested in

in reply to stux⚡

This does make sense though 📉

coindesk.com/price/mask-networ…

in reply to stux⚡

@stux The admin is/was Suji Yan / Sujitech LLC (sujitech.com) who is a chinese crypto bro residing in Japan

That instance was unmoderated for a long time. That admin was really into crypto, so I assume they have been engaging in pumping and dumping scheme?

in reply to Chris Trottier

Normally I wouldn’t reply to point out a typo 😬 but this one’s in a domain name: .jo for .jp. Editable?
in reply to Chris Trottier

theoretically, I could see an economic model where if the instance was running off a token, owners of that token would be incentivised to keep the service good because more people would come in, them buying more tokens would make the value of their investment rise.

However, greed always does get the best of people, so also a lot of people would get scammed.

If done properly, markets can be amazing too. We’ll see how many fiascos it takes to get it right though. 🙂

in reply to Chris Trottier

I do wonder if it is either them trying to fedi-wash their crypto or move sideways into something less of a burning tyre fire or possibly both?

"Look look, we are cool and part of the fed, no that nasty crypto bullshit"

Similar to Shell/BP with solar and wind.

in reply to Chris Trottier

is re-centralising any different to some of the *giant* instances. I'm a big believer in it being a federation of planets, some will be bigger some will be smaller, and that works.

It is definitely an interesting journey ahead however it pans out, but ultimately users have *choice* and that's a good thing.

in reply to Chris Trottier

I'm not sure where I'd find the numbers but I'd say that geographically we see that with what I'd have to say is close to 90% of aussie users on aus.social and a large chunk of irish users on one instance too. There's a certain confidence organisations like mozilla can bring to running big instances and I thoroughly support that move (and agree with your earlier post points on how they could do better fediverse too!)
in reply to Jared 🇦🇺🏳️‍🌈⚧️👽

PS man.. please sit down for a chat with me sometime for this new podcast 😀 I'd love to talk your ideas for different future-fediverse things. You've had plenty of interesting to say since I started following you.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I'm in Aus/Sydney; but very flexible on times; I intend to drop episodes weekly on Wednesday nights my time. Would want a 30 minute slot; will DM you some starting questions I'd ask. Haven't decided if I keep wednesday nights to headlines and do the deep dives as they happen perhaps.. the only days I've got blocked out for work are all ones you wouldn't to do do it on anyway (Christmas is full of live sports production work lol)
in reply to Chris Trottier

Mastodon has the ability to let people run their own instances by their domainserver they rented... so there is always an escape plan for this.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I am on an anarchistic server, I guess they won't sell me so soon. Gladly, various groups are able to be here. We just need to know who is sold and who owns stuff. And then we need to move accordingly.
in reply to Chris Trottier

watch the terms and mods and be prepared to migrate. Vote with our feet.
in reply to Chris Trottier

im going to keep posting about cock and balls to bring property prices down
in reply to internet relay cat

@jesopo given the kind of contents shared on pawoo, I'm not entirely sure that works
in reply to Chris Trottier

The risk is very high that one day we will not be able to run our instance. As it is for email now : in theory you can, but in reality it's a nightmare to not be considered as spam by GAFAM.
Embrace. Extend. Extinguish.
in reply to Chris Trottier

The speed at which Birdsite is being destroyed will surely deter parties from investing in another centralized social medium. Looking at the overall dynamics of the fediverse, we are surely witnessing a tipping point. It seems Musk has given this development a push. Next the Zucker with Meta.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Suddenly pleased - though I moved at speed and with little forethought - that I chose mastodon.social. Now looking at how I can support it financially in the face of a land grab
in reply to Chris Trottier

and that's why is more and more important to support "independent" instances.
Or we'll be int he very same situation we've seen in the past with email (as a random example).
in reply to Chris Trottier

Nothing. It is an inherent possibility of the decentralized model. Education is everything, and for many people a well managed mastodon.microsoft.com isn’t a bad option. But people should be aware that if they won’t put their money in the wegrabyourmoneyandrun.com online bank, a minimum of due diligence is necessary
in reply to Chris Trottier

I will definitely not be reccomending large instances. A small instance is less likely to be acquired. And you can actually get to know the Admins.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I'm going to continue being anti-capitalist. What else can I do? I mean, at 58 years old, it's unlikely I'll suddenly start supporting the robber barons.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Me personally? Keep using plastic straws and taking long showers because that's not where the problem is.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Started my own instance. It's easy and I now control as much as I can of my social presence.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I wanted to share this with my (admittedly small) community and reiterate something I agree with in the thread - vote with your feet. Mastodon has great migration tools; pay attention to who administers (and owns) your instance and do what you feel is right for the fediverse.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I'm thwarting the trend by running my own private instance on a #RaspberryPi - I admit this might not be the right move for a lot of folk.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I’m heading to Mozilla's instance once it's up, I trust their vision for the web over mostly anyone else's.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Lovely contradiction in the Yahoo article:

"The Pawoo acquisition marks another milestone of the Mask team towards the building of a decentralized social network and a free, open internet."

A diverse #fediverse will be a healthy robust one.

in reply to Chris Trottier

nothing. We don't need to do anything. Let them buy up what they want. People will migrate or stay as they see fit. You and I and others don't need to do anything.
in reply to Chris Trottier

That's like someone telling me, after my Globe and Mail column in 1999 said Linux was going to be massive, that 'someone will just up buying Linux.'

They didn't fundamentally understand what it was.

We'll have RedHat's here, we'll have Canonical's, we'll have companies which will do a for-profit thing to onboard people, just as ISPs emerged.

But it sure as heck won't be re-centralized....

IMHO.

(-;

in reply to Chris Trottier

to thwart this trend I am going to stay with my lovely admin who promised not to sell our instance
in reply to Chris Trottier

not sell my 4 user instance for anything less than a billion dollars. Pretty sure that'll do it.
in reply to Chris Trottier

honestly, IMHO, I don't think a little centralization is "bad," as long as the majority of the network remains decentralized, which is likely with the current setup.
in reply to Chris Trottier

This is why I wrote this article in November... 2023.mattwilcox.net/protecting…
in reply to Chris Trottier

How do the big instances afford their server bills, or even make any money?
in reply to Chris Trottier

Those who can should regularly donate to support their instance (I do), so no one feels that they must sell because of financial pressure. Also, pawoo.net isn't really in the fediverse, almost everyone blocks it for uncontrolled vile 8chan style behavior.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I have my own instance… I’ll probably just continue thriving right here 😀
in reply to Chris Trottier

re-centralization isn't just, or primarily a tech problem, but my understanding is that there are architectural issues that favor centralization. Particularly the efficiency of exchanging toots from people with large audiences across instances. Improving that will help shift the balance away from centralization. This phenomenon isn't unique to Mastodon, its seen in other decentralized systems, but there are technical mitigations.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Some big viral accounts, who merged over from Twitter, are on Mastodon.cloud.
in reply to Chris Trottier

It's important that we remember that centralization is a spectrum, not all or nothing. I completely agree that we should be wary of moves like Mask group is making. But our rhetoric should acknowledge that some centralization is ok, else we risk discouraging collaboration.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I will stay on my instance digitalcourage.social and happily pay for the service.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I do wonder if it is not either/or but instead both/and, across many dimensions. What is a mastodon instance running in Amazon S2? Decentralization continues to be a troubled term.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Defederating any instance with more than 50k accounts would be a good start.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I agree the centralization is bad to the fedi, just it is weird to make such an appeal from the biggest fedi instance. Instance running by a company isn't necessarily a bad thing, Pawoo has been run by Pixiv, then Russell before changing-hand to this affiliate of Mask Network, a sponsor of Mastodon.
in reply to 愛知

@pch_xyz I run several instances myself. However, this specific account is used for a purpose.
in reply to Chris Trottier

The problem with migration is that old toots are not migrated 😩
in reply to Chris Trottier

If my instance gets acquired by a big corporation, I will just move to another one. Also planning to start my own instance when my account gets enough followers.
in reply to Chris Trottier

@nazgul My plan is to block large instances if they don’t respond immediately to reports.
in reply to Chris Trottier

i think this will also be a test of people's willingness to gravity toward central authorities instead of relying/building sustained democratic self governance
in reply to Chris Trottier

@nazgul We already have multiple galaxies in the Fediverse (including the local group of those subscribing to the Mastodon covenant, the Nazi sites we have all defederated, TruthSocial, etc). If a bunch of large instances want to create a centralized Twitter clone based on ActivityPub, let them. We have the tools to make them essentially invisible to us.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Best we can do at the public level is raise Fediverse awareness so that everyone knows what's going on, especially the Admins who can then easily block them.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I never understood why, unless someone makes a compatible #fork of #mastodon that allows for #advertisements.

I decided to #sefhost for fun and for control over my data.

in reply to Chris Trottier

the wealthy & powerful must control ALL of the media if they are to control the masses. They are working hard at it.
Even as far as attempting to disparage the term "woke".
But it is definitely time for people to be wide awake.
Hate to keep saying it, but,
Resistance is not futile. Resistance is voltage (power) divided by current (direction). And there is power in numbers.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I have 3 mastodon accounts on three different instances, so I can post about very different things, depending on the content rules of each one.

I guess that was accidentally a good idea.

in reply to Chris Trottier

A decentralized network is toxic to power and control.

A successful decentralized network, even more so.

in reply to Chris Trottier

given mstdn.jp seems relaxed about child porn, maybe instances should defederate now
in reply to Chris Trottier

I wonder if we start seeing these VC-funded instances forking and dropping the export feature... 🤔 💭
in reply to Chris Trottier

And this may well be what saves Mastodon. That's not to say that people shouldn't watch closely what happens on their instance --- they should. But if your instance starts doing things you don't like, you can always move instances and keep your followers.

(I know you said this already, but in my discussions with people from "the other place", it's a common concern, so in my opinion it's worth repeating.)

in reply to Chris Trottier

migration isn't an option for me because i've been here (on .social, at least) since 2016 and don't want to lose my post history. the more stuff like this happens the more frustrating the lack of movement on that issue is! github.com/mastodon/mastodon/i…
in reply to Chris Trottier

although there still needs to be a better/working post migration feature to make it truly seamless.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I got a sniff of this a few days ago on the birdapp, a panic thread "it's collapsing where will I go"-type loud replies, but also "who owns \\it\\" [as if] ... "where's the equity" etc.
in reply to Chris Trottier

we blocked mstdn.jp mastodon.cloud (gave it limited access) and pawoo.net plus gab truthsocial activitypub-trolls and gitadon - anyone else we should be blocking? @krang
in reply to Chris Trottier

> you're not locked into those instances. If you want, you can migrate elsewhere.

Dystopian thought: how long before a commercial entity stops their instance from cooperating with migration requests?

in reply to Chris Trottier

@glennf 💯 this. I was on mastodon.cloud after having joined in 2017. I didn’t like where things were going so I moved to hachyderm.io and am way better off for it. You lose your post history but keep your followers. Worth it.
in reply to Chris Trottier

@glennf I was, and I did (migrate away 2 weeks ago). I’m now a VERY happy hachyderm.io camper and our admin & team rocks!
in reply to Chris Trottier

I think I reported or at least complained about mastodon.cloud months before.

The admin, Suji Yan, Sujitech LLC, a chinese who resides in Japan, is a staunch crypto bro (sujitech.com)

mastodon.cloud has been unmoderated for a long time, because the admin was too busy with crypto stuff. And other users have complained about it.

Chris Trottier reshared this.

in reply to Chris Trottier

Also - the larger the #instance, the greater the risk that, for example, due to poor #moderation, we will unwittingly become victims of defederation by other instances. Let's be as close to our admin as possible - preferably be your own admin of your instance.
in reply to Chris Trottier

As I’m currently finding out, this is not trivial at all. The technical part is doable for a seasoned sysadmin but not for people unfamiliar with servers and software development. The real issue however is discoverability and resource consumption. My tiny instance was close to empty until I enabled relays, which then flooded the media cache with data at several GB/hour. CPU usage spiked to an average of 175% on a two-core VPS. Also, repeatedly, posts arrive with large-ish delays.
in reply to Marcel Bischoff

@hrbf There's another way to build federation without relays. But I can talk about that another day.
in reply to Chris Trottier

My point being: as is, your suggestion appears not to be a suitable solution for the issue you’re raising.
in reply to Marcel Bischoff

@hrbf There's no doubt this takes energy and work. It might not be a solution for everyone, but if you have means and technical know-how, it's worth doing.

Making it easier for everyone is also a worthwhile endeavour.

in reply to Chris Trottier

Absolutely. This won’t solve the discoverability issue though. I’d be interested in reading your thoughts on how to do this efficiently.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Interesting! I'd love to discuss this with you in private. What is your email?
in reply to Chris Trottier

🇫🇷 : Il va y avoir une accaparement massif des terres de toutes ces grandes instances. Il y aura aussi beaucoup de fusions et d'acquisitions.

Mon conseil est que vous deveniez tous * très * conscients de qui possède votre instance et pourquoi.

Apprenez à connaître vos administrateurs et assurez-vous que leurs valeurs correspondent aux vôtres.

Si vous ne voulez pas mettre votre vie sur les réseaux sociaux entre les mains d'inconnus, alors auto-hébergez votre propre instance.

in reply to Chris Trottier

Indeed... I run into "ET" beings occasionally, and research Xenopsychology and associated PSI abilities. It's hardcore woo on my instance, and we all try to remain anonymous for quite obvious reasons.

I mean, with all the above being the case, I think anyone joining knows exactly what kind of thing they're trying to get into ;)

in reply to Chris Trottier

I fully agree that one should be aware of who their true landlord is. But it’s not helpful to just say “host your own instance”. That requires time, money and technical expertise beyond the reach of 99% of citizens. This concept of selecting a server is already a weird/new thing for most people. A more consumer friendly solution might be a public “health label” that reveals location, ownership, admins, etc to encourage consumer education and choice.
in reply to /potts/kevin

@kevinpotts I wouldn't go that far. Services like Cloudron make running your own instance super easy.

But sure not everyone can do it. If you have the means, do it.

in reply to Chris Trottier

*If* you have some baseline experience managing a server or doing anything technical. This is a literal foreign language to most people:
in reply to Chris Trottier

Yeah, middle of a land grab. Great thing to read before the morning coffee. --- maybe not.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I’m not well up on the broader Fediverse as yet, but I wonder is an instance required, compelled or just expected to redirect one account to another, should a user find they want to switch instance after a buy-out of this sort? This is another strong case for applying a limited lifespan to toots.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Even better yet, form #Association|s and #PlatformCooperative|s to run #Fediverse instances, and setup instances at already existing associations and #cooperative|s.

When establishing a #coop in #Europe, prefer the form of a #EuropeanCooperative (#SCE), and avoid to make your #headquarters in #FRG, because its #CooperativeLaw still contains inhibiting #Nazi regulations from #Y1934.

🌺

🏷️ #Genossenschaft #ICA #InternationalCooperativeAlliance #Introduction #CooperativeEconomics

in reply to Chris Trottier

I think @SDF is strange but in a good way, like me. They are the best kind of strange(rs) I know.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Actually, I think joining a cooperatively owned-and-managed instance like social.coop is a far more feasible way for most people to protect themselves from the inevitable corporatization this space than self-hosting.
in reply to Chris Trottier

For everyone who tries to host an instance, I can highly recommend the mastodon docker image of linuxserver.io
fleet.linuxserver.io/image?nam…
in reply to Chris Trottier

So at the risk of being very rude and uninformed as a new mastodon user ... one of the more striking aspects of the ecosystem I've observed is that it doesn't seem that normal to have an easily accessible and very transparent statement as to who the admins of an instance are, how they operate and what their motivations and policies are. Not true across the board obviously, but given the importance of an instance, as this information highlights, I expected more information.
in reply to Chris Trottier

following instance admins is like half the fun on being here. Ppl who doesnt do that are missing out.
in reply to Chris Trottier

"Your social media life in the hands of strangers" is exactly why Mastodon is no better than Twitter for most users. If you're on a "big instance" you're just running an expensive (for the site owners) blog where someone else holds the rope around your neck, just like you had with Twitter.

Want to experience the real freedom? Set up your own host. Run your own instance. Own your own data and communications and filters.

in reply to Chris Trottier

What percentage of social media users would you estimate are capable of, or interested in running their own server? My guess is a fraction of a percent.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Conveniently it's what, 4 clicks to move servers and keep your follow lists? Will make it hard for corps to keep you walled in if you want to go.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Self host? Sorry, but I couldn't begin to know how to do that. Or, for that matter, what it would require.
If you do, please enlighten the less knowledgeable among us.
in reply to Chris Trottier

A couple weeks ago I wondered here if the future of Mastodon was large instances roaming the fediverse like mobile cities in Mortal Engines, gobbling up smaller instances
in reply to Chris Trottier

I'm very happy to be on an instance run by real people I could eventually meet, and populated by ~100 people in my home town. That's worth a few bucks when it comes time to pay some bills.

The user experience has some rough spots, but knowing I'm not being actively manipulated into doom-scrolling is wonderful

in reply to Chris Trottier

Read through this *long* thread but didn't see the answer - how does one find the admins, etc.?

I initially chose awscommunity.social because it aligns with professional work.

in reply to Chris Trottier

I am in mastodon.social since long before the twitter diaspora, and I am happy that I am on a largish instance: it gives me a sense of stability and durability. I would tend to trust large instances owned by responsible companies (a mozilla instance would be a very good thing) or anyhow companies that already have in their hands lots of my data and are tied, here in the EU, by GDPR (I would probably join a Google owned instance).
Questa voce è stata modificata (2 anni fa)
in reply to Chris Trottier

omg Chris I have wanted to learn #opensource for years , and thrilled to be here, but I feel like you're asking us to grow up too fast (whiny voice)
in reply to Chris Trottier

or diversify and use 1 instance per personality (no need to dump one's entire life in a single account, it is rude anyway) then if a personality gets hard banned just reboot that one.
in reply to Chris Trottier

"...then self host" is really not possible for over 95% of all people everywhere. We can't expect everyone to just look at social media and be like "i'm gonna make all of this my problem".

If we say "you should self-host" we're basically saying "this is for nerds only". And I refuse to accept that.

in reply to Chris Trottier

"If you don't want to put your social media life in the hands of strangers, then self-host your own instance."

Welp, that's what I was afraid of. 😒

in reply to Chris Trottier

the above (click through on this toot and scroll up ☝️☝️☝️) is yet another reason why the common adage “it doesn’t matter which server you’re on”, often said to newbie Mastodonians, isn’t really true.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Thanks. Where can we find a list of those so that I cna move if need.
in reply to Chris Trottier

To me, this is the inherent weakness of federation. It's too hard for most people to set up their own instance and too easy for money to go around and scoop up the big ones.
Hmmm… does anyone know of a turn-key solution for creating an instance? I'm not sure what the pro/con analysis for that looks like, but it sounds healthy to give "normies" an easy path to owning their own instance.
in reply to Chris Trottier

... and here's my little story of my self-host, because I'm in charge.

I answer to no one.

Well, except my wife. But she doesn't 'nix, so the server is all mine. She doesn't even get to have su.

jimcarroll.substack.com/p/crea…

in reply to Chris Trottier

mstdn.gamercast.net is not for sale. 😊

End of.

in reply to Chris Trottier

will the land-grabbed large instances continue to federate with self hosted instances though? That's already a bit of an issue with email.
in reply to Farbs

@Farbs In this case, most instances have de-federated with that large instance.

It remains to be seen whether they will follow suit with mstdn.jp or mastodon.cloud.

in reply to Chris Trottier

Can someone clarify for me? If there’s not ad revenue or data mining, what makes an instance a lucrative investment for Wall Street fat cats?
in reply to Chris Trottier

Thanks for sharing. Please continue to post such information and disseminate broadly.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I'm very happy with my instance and Admin @stux I feel I got very lucky choosing this instance when I signed up.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Here's the tricky thing though... even if you self host, the instances you interact with will still have the info of that interaction. Much like self housing your email it's jeopordized by emailing contracts using Gmail, you can self host, but still have little privacy if yoy mainly interact with instances owned by unsavory types. That said, self hosting does let yoy more easily defederate from instances you find distasteful.
@karenyin
in reply to Chris Trottier

@SwiftOnSecurity
From what I read, hosting is the easy part. The hard part is coming up with a domain name.
in reply to Chris Trottier

“Then self-host your own server.”
@atomicpoet The population of people who can (or should) be running their own server software (web server, Mastodon instance, Discord server, anything) is a *tiny* fraction of the world. Most people do not have the equipment, the skills, the time or the security awareness.
(TBH, ‘getting to know my server’s admins’ is not high up on my list of life priorities either…)
in reply to Chris Trottier

@glennf That won’t happen. We’re here to socialize not to run Linux servers. But thanks for the heads-up about Mastodon instances. Mine is run by an excellent professional organization, but others may not be so lucky 🙁
in reply to Chris Trottier

it's pretty simple to migrate an account to a new instance, just FYI.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Which disturbingly means they need a plan to make money back. Although it seems to me Twitter had very little idea when it was originally financed.

Personally I’d prefer to pay a small contribution for my instance to continue, and hopefully with enough people doing it they can afford service costs and personal. Adverts are abhorrent as targeting is usually by personal data mining. Subscriptions set up a pay wall & reduce adoption.

I like being a person not product

in reply to Chris Trottier

Do you know which are those 3 large instances? Thank you.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Pawoo was never ran by volunteers. It was founded by Pixiv and sold to a Hentai company. This is just another company in the chain.
in reply to Polychrome

@Polychrome Yes, but there's an assumption a lot of people have that every instance is run by volunteers. This is not true.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Ah, pawoo.net - a large but widely defederated instance due to poor moderation and questionable content. Also mstdn.jp and mastodon.cloud.

yahoo.com/now/mask-network-acq…

Apparently they also developed the "official" app (which roundly sucks) and seem to be Web 3.0™ proponents. None of which bodes well.

in reply to Chris Trottier

I think, the key thing #fediverse needs now is for fedi-concious lawyers (of which I saw here a bunch) from around the world to put together the set of documents and recomendations for volunteers for registering an independent NGO with transparent rules on instance-wise descision-making. That should be an enormous step in metigating these kinds of risks. The main thing is to distinct between globally-applicable set of recomendations, and these for the exact jurisdictions
in reply to Chris Trottier

Web3 and VC bro's are coming for your instance:

"Mask has obtained tens of thousands of users and has raised over US$50 million from private and institutional backers. To further its vision of building the Web3 social network ecosystem, Mask announced the launch of a US$42 million Bonfire Union fund in July 2022 to strategically invest in decentralized social network, infrastructure, and creative contents."

prnewswire.com/news-releases/m…

in reply to Chris Trottier

move to smaller instances or start your own, it’s pretty easy and there’s a ton of niche instances out there
in reply to Chris Trottier

if those instances turn out to not have rules/ethos aligns with other instances, they'll just be blocked. Job done.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Reference:
prnewswire.com/news-releases/m…
in reply to Chris Trottier

when you get a moment... please share the names of the instances so I can block them nowsies.
in reply to Chris Trottier

if cryptocurrency is going so great, why do they need to raise fiat? /S
in reply to Chris Trottier

Three out of hundreds, right?
And more instances are being started all the time. The whole journa instance is being run by Adam Davidson is only a couple of months old.
in reply to Chris Trottier

i can confirm that @tams.tech is run by volunteers! just one actually, haha @scott
in reply to Chris Trottier

FUCK!! Here we go. We went from Heroic Years to Decline and Fall, with no Golden Age in between. Sic transit gloria mastodoni.
Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
Chris Trottier
@Sbectol I doubt that's the case. But you should ask.
Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
Chris Trottier
@Sbectol Specifically, it says "The Social Coop"—which may be different from social.coop. But I don't know.
Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
Chris Trottier
@fasnix If your goals are for de-centralization, this is an attempt at de-centralization.
Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
Chris Trottier
@adnan I can live with that. Why would I want to associate myself with re-centralists?
Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
Chris Trottier
@DarlavdRiet That's exactly what it is.
Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
Chris Trottier

@Lowena mastodon.social is under the direct aegis of Mastodon, which is a non-profit, and is run by @Gargron.

This is one reason I continue to use this instance.

in reply to Chris Trottier

Thankfully there are mechanisms in place to move from instances. But yes, this is definitely going to become a thing now that Mastodon is receiving attention beyond a thing some geeks do.
in reply to Chris Trottier

This is absolutely fascinating and also makes me feel a bit gross reading it.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Oh wow... But also.... not surprised that acquisitions will likely happen some of the bigger instances. I maybe didn't expect to see it quite so soon....

With this news it also occurs to me that I don't know much about what Mastodon's history has been in the non-English speaking parts of the world....

I feel like thus far when I've run across instances and users that are not English, they are usually German.

Are there clusters of Mastodon (or other Fediverse) instances that are more isolated based on factors like language?

in reply to Chris Trottier

Instances needs to start implementing rules to bind them to the mast and stop them from being bought out asap
in reply to Chris Trottier

we were just having a related discussion with @kaievans . I do worry that a truly mainstream audience isn't going to care about decentralization enough for that to prevent issues from this kind of thing.
in reply to Chris Trottier

@menica in this regard, should I preventively move ( and am I welcome) to eldritch cafe ?
in reply to Chris Trottier

Interesting, Pawoo seems to (?post /use) ads since MAY.
Now if the Ads are posts you HAVE to subscribe to they would propagate through all of the fediverse. Good reason to block
,
in reply to Chris Trottier

Mmm isn't the whole point of Mastodon to remain independent?
in reply to alainochoa

@alainochoa The point of the Fediverse is the de-centralization of social media. That doesn't mean people won't try to re-centralize it.
in reply to Chris Trottier

somebody sooner ol later will utilize web3 to monetize instance (it's not free, because computers aren't free and electricity is not free). And better that way than PayPal way.

I would love to have Metamask login by the way, passwords sucks.

Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
Chris Trottier
@gabriel_berardi If you self-host a Pleroma instance, instead of a Mastodon instance, it costs $5/month.
Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
Chris Trottier
@mensrea @gisiger Well, this is why marketing is so important.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I read that as Musk and not Mask initially. Would not put it past him to try to purchase the competition. He’s got financial ties to Post as it is
in reply to Chris Trottier

I checked out the article, it didn't mention other instances de-federating from it. Can you help me understand why it would have been a target for de-federation?
in reply to Chris Trottier

well geeze, now I want to signup for it! Japan has the best content!
Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
Chris Trottier
@victoriadecapua You're using a service that is built for de-centralization. That is why it exists. If you didn't find this useful to a certain extent, you wouldn't be here.
Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
Chris Trottier

@victoriadecapua Okay, but why are you here on Mastodon? Why not hang out on Twitter instead? And if you don't like Twitter, why not Post or Hive or Tribel?

You have lots of choice, but you're here.

Unknown parent

Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
Chris Trottier
@thilo Don't worry, it gets better.
in reply to Chris Trottier

wait, what? Mastodon.cloud is run by web3 types? I think I need to transfer servrers pronto...

Chris Trottier reshared this.

in reply to Chris Trottier

there are some benefits in an instance with some friends despite it being a bit expensive.
Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
Chris Trottier

@victoriadecapua So you don't like Elon. I don't like him either. Thing is, Elon can't buy Mastodon.

You know why? Because Mastodon is de-centralized.

Now certain entities will try to re-centralize social media. If we build a culture that values resistance to another wannabe Musk, then that means decentralizing social media.

That's all I have to say. Have a wonderful night.

in reply to Chris Trottier

Dang, that's spooky.

I wonder what the admin of my instance is like... Hopefully they're nice.

Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
Chris Trottier
@mensrea @gisiger This is true—but not impossible.
Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
Chris Trottier

@mensrea @gisiger Mastodon is a non-profit. The W3C, which standardized ActivityPub, is also a non-profit. The Mozilla Foundation, which just announced they will be investing in the Fediverse, is also a non-profit.

There's also several ethical for-profit entities building out the Fediverse.

in reply to Chris Trottier

...not surprising at all considering cryptobros and their lack of morals
in reply to Chris Trottier

Honestly the only thing that's missing from Mastodon is support for payment networks. (not).
in reply to Chris Trottier

@mensrea But Mozilla takes money from Google, therefore it's a front for Google to take over the fediverse! (not my words, but I just read something along those lines here ...)
in reply to Chris Trottier

Its not just the domain name of the instance itself that we need to be mindful of but also the #CDN that the server is using for images. Many instances use a seperate CDN.

The instance we are on uses what we understand to be a popular one by #BunnyCDN, namely cdn.masto.host.

As a secondary concern such CDN appears to block #Tor. We are again unable to post images again. (@witchescauldron)

1/2

#blocksTor #unethicalConduct @mensrea @gisiger

in reply to Chris Trottier

do we know why pawoo.net is widely shunned?

And, if it's widely shunned, is its sale a matter of concern?

in reply to Chris Trottier

Why did "many instances de-federate from [pawoo.net]"?

Didn't like the moderation policies, their business model ?

in reply to Chris Trottier

Is “defederated” why, when attempting to follow an account, I have occasionally encountered a message that a given account is “suspended”?
in reply to Chris Trottier

Man, I miss Pawoo when it was owned by Pixiv.

It was mainly targeted for artist, now not so much...

in reply to Chris Trottier

I wish @Gargron (mastodon.social) blocked pawoo.net instance as soon as possible.

Advertising instances have to be defederated as soon as possible such as [un]Truth Social.

They directly attemp to the #Fediverse founding principles and source code license of #Mastodon.

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 anni fa)
in reply to Chris Trottier

The first thing I saw when looking at Pawoo was sh0tacon and l0licon „art“ - understandable why it is defederated.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Ha! That de-federation got somehow lost in the press release… 🤪interesting developments nevertheless.
in reply to Chris Trottier

@mensrea @gisiger No silver bullet, but Fediverse instances for specific languages, regions, topics... are more likely to be run and supported by volunteers. Call it branding on instance level. Think globally, act locally. But: soon commercial providers will offer "host an instance for your community". Not good.
in reply to Chris Trottier

"The Pawoo acquisition marks another milestone of the Mask team towards the building of a decentralized social network and a free, open internet." Sorry, I don't understand. If instances are being acquired by a common owner, isn't that the opposite of decentralisation?
in reply to Chris Trottier

that web3 thing we should implement

1. Metamask login is beautiful
2. We should do the ICO and monetize the platform like Twitter and Facebook does, but keeping decentralization.
3. We should treat instance admins as miners. That way admins can retire from other jobs and focus on instance. Also this would return electricity bills, hardware.

in reply to Chris Trottier

Has it been defederated by lots of instances for sloppy moderation, or purely for being run by big business?

The former is a good reason, but I think the latter would be unfortunate.

in reply to Chris Trottier

The hottest fediverse commerce is to be found here: Hetzner, OVH, AWS.
in reply to Chris Trottier

interesting.
Why did so many instances defederate from that instance?
in reply to Chris Trottier

and this is, kids, why federation and open protocols matters. Those users can change outside of Pawoo.net easily… if they so desire, of course.

Also why medium-sized instances are probably the best place to be…

in reply to Chris Trottier

Yikes Cryptobros and Web 3.0 corrupt everything they touch. I think it's very important In the future that there enough bigger default trustworthy servers with oversight for the average audience or it could end in a total shitshow.
in reply to Chris Trottier

legit banks are supposed to KYC (know your customer) maybe the #fediverse should have KYA : Know Your Admin #kya
in reply to Chris Trottier

that seems not great. Troubling in fact. I chose my instance at random when I fled Twitter. Is there a good place to go, to help understand all the nuances between instances? Probably better to move sooner than later.
in reply to Chris Trottier

given that i am very new to all this, why is this particular instance de-federated? poor moderation policies?
in reply to Chris Trottier

screw Meta, being the one to setup / control the server of the main mastodon community on each topic is the real digital land rush
in reply to Chris Trottier

How do we know it’s reliable information? I have not seen this reported elsewhere.
in reply to Chris Trottier

@Sbectol
Social Coop Limited was likely formed by Mask Network specifically to make this purchase. Basically, it only exists to own pawoo.net. I would also point out this is a press release, their announcement of the purchase, not a news story.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Unsettling but important to acknowledge. Thanks for bringing it to our attention and spot on with making certain that your values match the instances.
in reply to Chris Trottier

@atomicpoet: Given the situation, are you sure sure it wasn't the Musk Group?

One can't be too careful these days. :blobcatbox:

in reply to Chris Trottier

> The Pawoo acquisition marks another milestone of the Mask team towards the building of a decentralized social network and a free, open internet.

Not sure how consolidating the top instances leads to decentralizing but ok.

in reply to Chris Trottier

Thank you for the heads-up. Despite that this is bad news, hopefully the good news is, is that they will purge all lolicon and other virtual child porn from pawoo. Although I doubt that this will happen.
Questa voce è stata modificata (2 anni fa)
in reply to Chris Trottier

my initial reaction is, yuck. but then i think it inevitable that some deep pockets will come in. eg, mozilla, although i recognize they're a different case since they'll be starting their instance from scratch.
running and maintaining servers can get pricey and someone needs to foot the bill(s). i don't know pawoo from a hole in the wall but you're right when you say we really need to know our admins and move elsewhere if we don't like what we find.
in reply to Chris Trottier

would they even be able to make money off of instances? or is this just another mass speculation where the goal is to not be the sucker that buys last
Unknown parent

in reply to Chris Trottier

Ugh, not great news. Thank you for sharing this, Chris.

Why have many instances de-federated from pawoo.net?

in reply to Chris Trottier

i originally joined mastodon.cloud back in ~2018, but in recent weeks the local tl became completely overrun with spammers posting offers to do fake product reviews on ebay etc.
no one seemed to be reviewing any of my reports, so i changed instances.
in reply to Chris Trottier

@adnan The vast, vast, majority of social media users can’t be arsed about the nuts and bolts or who runs an instance. That doesn’t make them “re-centralists”. You may be missing a key part of the “social” part of social media. Demanding everyone be a tech dweeb is unworkable.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I guess it was just a matter of time before something like this started happening. I wonder how that will turn out for them given that moving around in the fediverse without losing your network is much easier than with centralized networks like Twitter and the likes.
in reply to Chris Trottier

is there a comprehensive list of things to evaluate when choosing an instance. Besides hearing "trust me bro" from the admin?
Bonus points if my 50yo parents can use that list.
in reply to Chris Trottier

@gabriel_berardi
And Mastodon for $6/mo.

The initial downside of your own instance: Your federated timeline would coincide with your home timeline and your local timeline will coincide with what you post yourself. You can increase the volume of the federated timeline by connecting to a relay (multiple instances are feeding relays) or by using a followbot (not everyone likes those, though). You can increase your own visibility only by getting people to follow you.

in reply to Chris Trottier

they're investing a lot of $$ in acquiring Mastadon instances. How do they plan to monetize that investment? Are ads allowed? Can they sell data?
in reply to Chris Trottier

What is the source of the contempt for them that results in defederation?
in reply to Chris Trottier

Ugh. Just a few communities on their servers, or many? Was it encouraged or tolerated there?
in reply to Shoq

@shoq Last I checked, there's around 800,000 accounts on pawoo.net. I don't know about "encourage" or "tolerate"—I don't read Japanese.
@Shoq
in reply to Chris Trottier

If people don't want their instances being taken over they need to be supporting their Admins and the cost of running those instances! How many people are using Mastodon for free? I'm broke AF and I set up monthly donations to my Admin. I'll be increasing the amount as soon as I can. Donate what you can. Every bit helps.

#Donate #AdminCosts #Patreon

in reply to Chris Trottier

that sucks. Soon we will be flooded with NFT and crypto currency crap.
in reply to Chris Trottier

so it begins. The slow and steady acquisition of #Mastadon by corporate interests.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I think the main weapon we have this time around is GDPR - Mastodon user data can't just be sold that easily.
Instances could put a poison pill in their user privacy policies saying that users would have to individually consent to new owners using the data.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Ok guys help me out, i am fully new, joined mastodon.cloud. Now i read it can or already is defedi... ??
Whats the implication for me here? If my instance gets deconnected what happens? That sounds like a bad development.
in reply to Chris Trottier

what does this mean? Does this mean that this group might be harvesting data?
in reply to Chris Trottier

I’ve seen this as inevitable, just as we have hotmail and gmail in the email space. I’m not sure it’s very scary, unless they start defederating the smaller sites. If they abuse users those users will leave. What am I missing?
in reply to Chris Trottier

Maybe a dumb question but perhaps a pertinent one to those on the receiving end of an unwanted acquisition:

Can you migrate your account to another Mastodon instance after yours has been de-federated, or is it then too late?

in reply to Chris Trottier

That seems quite weird. I have one account on mastodon.cloud and I thought this instance is being abandoned, because they didn't even bother to upgrade to 4.0 software.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I guessed that businesses acquiring instances would be an Achilles heel for the structure of Mastodon. However innovative federated services might be a protection against that if enough people demand the others services
in reply to Chris Trottier

NFTs? Then we should defederate at once. Exactly zero good comes from any of this. I rather leave Mastodon than deal with commercial BS.

(Happy to sponsor instances etc, but this isn’t that.)

in reply to Chris Trottier

Is this corporate money flowing into Mastodon? Should we be afraid?
in reply to Chris Trottier

I don't know if we can still call it a "mastodon" instance as Pawoo forked Mastodon a while ago and has clearly diverged : 4336 commits ahead, 2629 commits behind mastodon:main.
It's more a Fediverse instance than a mastodon one 😀
in reply to Chris Trottier

Huh. I had no idea mastodon.cloud and mstdn.jp were already run by one entity. dotcloud was actually my first instance, but I left it because it was unreliable as heck.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Important context on why Pawoo got so big and why it's widely defederated (its about "lolicon").

I don't know (i really don't) that this acquisition is a generalizable example...

ethanzuckerman.com/2017/08/18/…

Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
Chris Trottier
@rurban Please don't link me to pedo stuff. I already know what pawoo.net hosts.
in reply to Chris Trottier

This is where Mastsdon confuses me. How do I access other “instances”? And I thought it said we could change servers - but how? And why would we?

I want to switch here full time, but it makes me feel so old to not understand this newfangled tech 😅

in reply to Chris Trottier

,

Important clarification.

#Web3 is about #Crypto.

#Web30 is about something utterly different i.e., a generation of #Web evolution characterized by the use of hyperlinks to denote anything rather than just documents (#HTML, #PDF, etc..). Net effect, a Web of machine-computable data.

The same folks that constructed #JavaScript from #Java as a marketing strategy, embarked on the same re "Web3" and "Web 3.0" 😀

Machine-computable clarity:
linkeddata.uriburner.com/descr…

#LinkedData

Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
Chris Trottier
@BalooUriza Nope, I'm trying to bust a myth that all instances are volunteer-run. This news should pop that bubble fast.
in reply to Chris Trottier

What does 'de-federated from it' mean in this context? Is there an instance I could check as an example?
in reply to Chris Trottier

It's no mystery why they are so widely defederated. A Google search for "Pawoo" gives me a simulated child porn artist as the second link on the page.

mstdnJP has actual child porn on it...

It's basic due diligence to keep that content off of your instance.

Glad to learn about the Mask Network owning more instances. I'm guessing they are of similar risk.

in reply to Chris Trottier

What does this mean for us proles?
And why was it defederated?

The article quotes figures in the millions, which seems at odds with the concept of "decentralization".

Unknown parent

in reply to Kerry Maxwell

@kerrymaxwell @adnan
If they are not interested in the foundation they are building their new homes on, their new homes will be as stable as their old homes in birdland.

Some people are willing to learn the basic concepts, some are not. This involves a minimum of mental work which is pain for some.

People who chose to stay ignorant will stay ignorant. It has nothing to do with being a tech dweep.The basic concepts are easy enough to understand for everybody.

Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
Chris Trottier

@kerrymaxwell @chris @adnan No one's telling you to self-host. What I am suggesting is:

* if you have the ability, self-host
* if you have time to learn, self-host
* if you're so paranoid that you can't trust anyone but yourself, self-host

In the meantime, get to know your instance admin and make sure they're someone you can put your confidence in.

Otherwise you get another situation where people have to migrate away from mastodon.cloud.

in reply to chris@strafpla.net

@chris @adnan “The basic concepts are easy enough to understand for everybody.” The basic concepts of internal combustion are easy enough to understand, but should not be a prerequisite for driving a car. Not knowing the basics of ICEs is not choosing to “stay ignorant” as much as having other shit to do and just needing to get to work.
Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
Chris Trottier
@splicer @tobyx @toychicken Not a contradiction: every iterative step helps.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I didn't thinking part of Mastodon was for sale. Is this a for -profit enterprise?
in reply to Hal Brown

@Hal_Brown Some instances are for-profit. As for Mastodon (the company)? It's a non-profit.
in reply to Chris Trottier

How does anyone make a profit here. I thought one of the biggest benefits of Mastodon was that it was non-profit. I can see individual's and tooters promoting themselves and have no problem with that. However I am leery of any entity making a profit off of owning a server or what some apparently call an instance/.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Not everyone has a selling price, will be a fun day when corporations discover that one
in reply to Chris Trottier

@kerrymaxwell @adnan
And if you just want to use Mastodon, understand the concept of federation and why the size and type of your instance matters.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I thought that was one of the major pros of being federated? Nobody can buy the platform. I get that instances can be aquired. Free market and all, but as believers in the platform and the ideals that it represents, why would instance owners be part of allowing it to be acquired and de-federated?
in reply to Corn Woman 🌽

@WomanCorn mastodon.social/@atomicpoet/10…
in reply to Chris Trottier

everyone on the fediverse: lmao where are all the crypto bros??? ahaha

crypto bros: hold on we’re almost there

in reply to Chris Trottier

Good to hear many instances have de-federated from it then. Web3 scams are the last thing we need in the fediverse
in reply to Chris Trottier

> the world's 2nd biggest Mastodon instance, has just been acquired.

This reminds me of the TV series Startup, in which a group comprising a technologist, a grifter, and a gangster get VC funding for a crypto project. Then later when the VCs pull the rug out from under them, they try again with a decentralized social network. Spoilers; it ends badly for everyone involved.

Keep in mind though that Mask Network has owned two big Mastodon servers for a while.

@smallcircles

in reply to Chris Trottier

Defederated largely due to widespread content most charitably described as “legal in Japan but almost nowhere else,” and more accurately described as nasty vile CSAM.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Thank the gods I left mastodon.social for another instance. I don’t want to get any of that Web 3.0 on me.
in reply to Chris Trottier

disappointed it is not thé Musk group who acquires pawoo
in reply to Chris Trottier

@kerrymaxwell @chris @adnan @Zir0h

going for paranoid myself ha ha … but no kidding try to find that group of people you sync with and fire up that instance. it’s fun and easy!

let’s have a healthy decentralized, diverse and happy #fediverse

in reply to Chris Trottier

Note, to head off any potential confusion: the entity that acquired Pawoo is apparently "Social Coop Limited". They are *completely unrelated* to social.coop/, and our folks have asked them to please change their corporation name. (I gather that they have said okay; hopefully they will follow through.)

Chris Trottier reshared this.

in reply to Justin du Coeur

@jducoeur Letting everyone know. However, what would be especially helpful is if you put out an "official" statement regarding this.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I honestly don't even know offhand who would craft that statement (I'm relatively new in town myself, and social.coop is relatively democratic and decentralized), but I'll add the suggestion.
Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
Chris Trottier
@WillMooreSD In your case, @Gargron owns your instance. Well, actually, the Mastodon non-profit owns it—but @Gargron runs the non-profit.
in reply to Chris Trottier

ah yes my favourite instance, pedophilia.social is in the news again
in reply to Chris Trottier

I think it's worth noting that pawoo was already corp-owned, so this isn't as big a change as it seems; the new corp is just shadier.

honestly i'm less worried about what this will do to the eng-speaking side of fedi and more about how bad a position the jp-speaking side is in, ooooof.

in reply to Chris Trottier

@fd0 @photovince @rustycrates @Thinkish @73ms @marti

Just a reminder that most of the running Mastodon instances point to our source code/bug report system *centralised* on a *Microsoft* git forge (/about page).

The developers seem unwilling to even enter a serious discussion about *starting* to plan a migration off <s>Twitter</s> Microsoft: github.com/mastodon/mastodon/i…

Without community pressure, we'll continue to advertise and depend on Microsoft.

@Codeberg

#MastodonOffGithub

in reply to Chris Trottier

Wait but they say "decentralized" and "open web" a lot, surely this means they are operating in good faith? /s

Maybe evidence of my millennial mind, but I read the last sentence (about a free and open internet) in the same cadence that Jeremy Irons delivered the line about the dawning of a new era, "where lion and hyena come together in a great and glorious future" in The Lion King, right after he's killed Mufasa and is assuming the throne.

in reply to Chris Trottier

We just launched an offer to host a complete Mastodon stack for $30 per month (trying to keep the cost as low as possible). Do you see it as a great first step for people to own their servers and data (genuinely fishing for feedback on our offer here)? qoddi.com/mastodon
in reply to Chris Trottier

I just had a bit of a google about pawoo. In the image search results it's immediately obvious why many other instances won't federate with them. Gotta say I agree with not federating with Pawoo.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I...I thought acquiring wasn't meant to be a thing here... :/
in reply to Chris Trottier

can someone tell me why Pawoo has been defederated? what did they do wrong?
in reply to Chris Trottier

I am laughing because I didn’t understand any of this🤣🤣
in reply to Chris Trottier

Pawoo has always been owned by Pivix, a "for profit" company for artists to share their work. You can even login there with your Pixiv account. I don't think any of the JP users thought they were on a "volunteer" instance. It was clearly "this company's social site" from the beginning.
in reply to Chris Trottier

On the one hand, this is curious news, but on the other hand, it's weird to imply that that's the reason so many instances are defederated from pawoo...

But I suppose discussing artistic freedom (although I've also heard pawoo was really bad at using CWs/marking art sensitive) and the news is a bit much for people to do at once...

Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
Chris Trottier
@clayrivers pawoo.net, mstdn.jp and mastodon
Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale
Chris Trottier

@clayrivers Sorry, forgot the TLD.

The last one is mastodon.cloud