Salta al contenuto principale


The Fedipact table showing which servers are blocking Threads is not accurate!

For example, it says that atomicpoet.org is blocking Threads when, in fact, this is not correct. So view this entire site with skepticism.

https://fedipact.veganism.social/

@fediversenews

in reply to Chris Trottier

They also don't appear to have cast a very wide net when collecting those inaccuracies. 😆
in reply to Chris Trottier

Not the first time: https://hear-me.social/@admin/112140288171458328

Just the first example that came up in a search.


@kommaKucken @thomkennon
hear-me.social is showing as blocking Threads.net. This is not true. We are limiting them. There are no plans to block them.

We never had them blocked and we never signed any fedipact agreement.

Can you tell me who provided you with this incorrect information?

Thanks


in reply to Chris Trottier

That table isn't the official #Fedipact site. It's run by @nm If you check their feed, you'll see they've been offline for the past few weeks due to health issues. There are problably some updates that haven't been applied.

@fediversenews

in reply to Chris Trottier

given how inaccurate it is, I have to wonder what the intent was. Cause it certainly doesn't seem to be meant as an accurate portrayal of which sites are and aren't federated w/ threads.net ...
in reply to Chris Trottier

Fedi-Scrapers!

(I’m sorry chris, I’ll let myself out…)

Unknown parent

Chris Trottier
@183231bcb @nm @tokyo_0 Oh, well I’m not talking about the official Fedipact, just the table.

Fediverse News reshared this.