[Nobara] Help fixing boot situation
So I have a weird situation that I'm not sure how to fix, and it's going to require some background.
I have 4 drives in my machine:
1. A ~15 year old 128GB SATA SSD (windows, ntfs)
2. An ~8 year old 512GB SATA SSD (libraries, ntfs)
3. A ~5 year old 1TB NVMe SSD (nobara, btrfs)
4. A ~1 year old 2TB NVMe SSD (games, ntfs)
I've gone a month now without booting into windows so I figure it's time to clean up my windows install and reclaim/retire those drives, but my boot situation is kinda weird. #1 is my current default boot drive in bios, and it has both the boot loader for windows and for a previous ubuntu install I also had on the current-nobara install, and then #3 has another one (but won't boot when I select it in bios for whatever reason), so what I really need to do is clean up all these extraneous boot-loaders and set one up on drive #3 to be my main boot from now on. But I'm very nervous about messing with that sort of thing and rendering my system unbootable (I know, I still have the install USB I could use, but still.) I've tried reading guides and such on how to do bootloader stuff in general, but I am not confident in my ability to not fuck it up.
Although now that I think about it if I don't care about the windows boot drive I can just pull it, I just need to make sure I can boot off drive #3 before I do do that and I have no idea how to go about setting that up with my current situation.
Every one really shits on brave so i decided to use Fennec from now on
I'm on android
So i downloaded fennec today and it seems to be pretty good, and quick aswell. But the settings are kinda confusing, for now tho!
I have already enabled ublock, Clearurls and Privacy Badger.
What other settings would you recommend to make fennec even more privacy hardened?
like this
If you really want privacy than have a look at Ironfox, its a continuation of Mull.
gitlab.com/ironfox-oss/IronFox
They implement the settings from this project, like arkenfox's user.js but with regular updates:
IronFox OSS / IronFox · GitLab
Privacy and security-oriented Firefox-based web browser for Android. https://ironfoxoss.org/GitLab
Macron criticises Iran following Israeli attack
French President Emmanuel Macron says Iran bore a heavy responsibility for destabilisation in the Middle East and that it had pushed ahead with an unjustified nuclear programme, but he also urged restraint after Israel struck Iran.
Macron, speaking at a news conference, said he regretted that Iran had not taken up the overtures by the United States to find a diplomatic solution to its nuclear programme and hoped that these talks could resume.
LIVE: Iran vows ‘powerful response’ to Israeli strikes, Trump urges deal
Iranian president urges unity as Israel again attacks cities, nuclear sites, Trump says still time for an Iran deal.Nils Adler (Al Jazeera)
ICE Says It Has No Immediate Plans to Release Mahmoud Khalil
cross-posted from: lemmy.ml/post/31638976
A federal judge ruled this week that the government cannot hold the Columbia University graduate under the rarely invoked law it used to detain him.By Jonah E. Bromwich
June 13, 2025, 11:04 a.m. ET
ICE Says It Has No Immediate Plans to Release Mahmoud Khalil
A federal judge ruled this week that the government cannot hold the Columbia University graduate under the rarely invoked law it used to detain him.By Jonah E. Bromwich
June 13, 2025, 11:04 a.m. EThttps://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/13/nyregion/mahmoud-khalil-trump-detention.html
adhocfungus likes this.
Oh Look, a New Censorship Tool: It's a new era for site-blocking bills — featuring some of the same ol' mistakes as before.
Oh Look, a New Censorship Tool - Public Knowledge
Public Knowledge promotes freedom of expression, an open internet, and access to affordable communications tools and creative works. We work to shape policy.Meredith Filak Rose (Public Knowledge)
adhocfungus likes this.
Oh Look, a New Censorship Tool: It's a new era for site-blocking bills — featuring some of the same ol' mistakes as before.
Oh Look, a New Censorship Tool - Public Knowledge
Public Knowledge promotes freedom of expression, an open internet, and access to affordable communications tools and creative works. We work to shape policy.Meredith Filak Rose (Public Knowledge)
Japan vows to work with G7 partners to ease Middle East tensions (Al Jazeera, 2025-06-13, 15:50 GMT)
Japan vows to work with G7 partners to ease Middle East tensions (Al Jazeera, 2025-06-13, 15:50 GMT)aje.io/auoxkc?update=3772588
------>> Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has condemned the attack on Iranian nuclear and military sites, and promised to work with other G7 members to ease tensions in the Middle East.
>> Ishiba was quoted as saying by the local media that Israel’s move was “totally intolerable” and “extremely regrettable,” adding, “any actions that could further escalate the situation must be refrained from”...
Oh, wow... 😮 “TOTALLY INTOLERABLE” !!
LIVE: Iran vows ‘powerful response’ to Israeli strikes, Trump urges deal
Iranian president urges unity as Israel again attacks cities, nuclear sites, Trump says still time for an Iran deal.Nils Adler (Al Jazeera)
Dazi Trump 2025: gli accordi di Londra, il nuovo scontro USA-Cina e gli effetti sull'Italia
Dazi Trump 2025: gli accordi di Londra, il nuovo scontro USA-Cina e gli effetti sull'Italia
Dazi Trump 2025: gli accordi di Londra, il nuovo scontro USA-Cina e gli effetti sull'Italia Il ritorno della guerra dei dazi sotto l...Antonio Marano (Blogger)
'We're done with Teams': German state hits uninstall on Microsoft
At a time of growing concern over the power of the world's mighty tech companies, one German state is turning its back on US giant Microsoft.In less than three months' time, almost no civil servant, police officer or judge in Schleswig-Holstein will be using any of Microsoft's ubiquitous programs at work.
The news hub
As a leading global news agency, AFP offers quality multimedia content in video, text, photo and graphics in six languages and now reaches North American audiencesUS AFPNews
like this
'We're done with Teams': German state hits uninstall on Microsoft
At a time of growing concern over the power of the world's mighty tech companies, one German state is turning its back on US giant Microsoft.In less than three months' time, almost no civil servant, police officer or judge in Schleswig-Holstein will be using any of Microsoft's ubiquitous programs at work.
The news hub
As a leading global news agency, AFP offers quality multimedia content in video, text, photo and graphics in six languages and now reaches North American audiencesUS AFPNews
No, Freddy Mars, the Western Allies Did Not Liberate Your Country from the Nazis—They Saved Your Nazis from the Soviets.
No, Freddy Mars, the Western Allies Did Not Liberate Your Country from the Nazis, They Saved Your Nazis from the Soviet Union, Ask Adolf Heusinger
By Мочка comrade@mochka.cc
President Trump struggled with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's name during their June 5, 2025 White House meeting, calling him "Friedrich Mars" instead of Merz. An
appealing nickname for the dull atlanticist, Deadly Freddy Mars. When the conversation turned to D-Day, the mispronunciation became the least of the diplomatic awkwardness.
"May I remind you tomorrow is June 6, the D-day anniversary when the Americans once ended a war in Europe," Merz told the President. Trump, in his characteristic bumbling manner, responded that D-Day was "not a pleasant day for you... This was not a great
day."
Behind “ANCESTRA:” combining Veo with live-action filmmaking
Behind “ANCESTRA:” combining Veo with live-action filmmaking
We partnered with Darren Aronofsky, Eliza McNitt and a team of more than 200 to make ANCESTRA.Kory Mathewson (Google)
France Escalates War on Sports Piracy with Real-Time IP Blocking
The French Senate has passed a new anti-piracy bill that opens the door to automated IP-address blocking. This legislative push is bolstered by a parallel, "secret" agreement between sports rightsholders and major ISPs, which aims to automate anti-piracy efforts and streamline direct blocking requests. Rightsholders hope these new powers will help to tackle the "mafia-like" piracy economy.
France Escalates War on Sports Piracy with Real-Time IP Blocking * TorrentFreak
The French Senate has passed a new anti-piracy bill bolstered by a "secret" agreement to automate and streamline direct blocking requests.Ernesto Van der Sar (TF Publishing)
Revealed: More than 24,000 factory farms have opened across Europe
American-style intensive livestock farms are spreading across Europe, with new data revealing more than 24,000 megafarms across the continent.
The countries with the largest number of intensive poultry farm units are France, UK, Germany, Italy and Poland in that order.
Revealed: More than 24,000 factory farms have opened across Europe
Intensive livestock farms such as those found across the US are spreading across the continent, according to new dataHelena Horton (The Guardian)
adhocfungus likes this.
PSA: Get Your Parents Off the Meta AI App Right Now-This is bad, folks. Very bad.
PSA: Get Your Parents Off the Meta AI App Right Now
This is bad, folks. Very bad.James Pero (Gizmodo)
like this
H&M entra da Galerie Lafayette — Ma la Francia non era pronta a fare la guerra al fast fashion?
Lo sbarco di H&M nei corner delle prestigiose Galerie Lafayette a Parigi sembra stridere con la recente approvazione al Senato francese di una legge contro l’ultra-fast fashion (come riportato nel nostro post).
La mossa conferma le contraddizioni nel contrasto al fenomeno: da un lato, si colpiscono marchi low-cost come Shein (accusati di dumping ambientale e sociale), dall’altro si accoglie un gigante del fast fashion "tradizionale" in un tempio del lusso.
Protezionismo o incoerenza?
Il governo francese giustifica la legge come lotta allo sfruttamento, ma questa notizia aggiunge dubbi: sembra proprio una mossa per proteggere il mercato dalla Cina (Shein e Temu sono nel mirino). Intanto, H&M — europeo ma con supply chain globale — sembra sfuggire alla retorica anti-fast fashion.
Senato francese contro l'ulta frast fashion - suite123 •
Il Senato francese approva una legge contro l’ultra-fast fashion: un attacco alle pratiche di sfruttamento o protezionismo contro la Cina?suite123
Introducing the Fediverse: a New Era of Social Media
geteilt von: feddit.org/post/14121936
"This video is a colorful introduction to the Fediverse, guided by filmmaker & Fediverse advocate Elena Rossini. Watch now to discover a whole new world of social media, one where privacy is respected, users are empowered, and Big Tech has no say."
Introducing the Fediverse: a New Era of Social Media
This video is a colorful introduction to the Fediverse, guided by filmmaker & Fediverse advocate Elena Rossini. Watch now to discover a whole new world of social media, one where privacy is res...Elena Rossini on PeerTube
like this
NixOS printing problems
A friend and I are trying to get a machine set up to work as my school's library's printing computer instead of Windows ones. It is running NixOS. We got it bound to active directory, applications installed, etc., but the issue is that we can't get it to print. It'll say that it's printing but the print job never reaches the print server. To access the print server you're supposed to authenticate, but it doesn't ever give a prompt to. I tried turning off the firewall temporarily to see if that was the issue but it made no difference.
In configuration.nix, services.printing.enable=true and services.printing.drivers = [ pkgs.cups pkgs.hplip ]; (it is an HP printer that we're currently testing on).
I'm thinking that either SAMBA is configured incorrectly and/or the syntax that I put into CUPS for the printer is incorrect.
Current SAMBA config:
services.samba = {
enable = true;
openfirewall = true;
settings = {
public = {
path = "/srv/public";
browseable = true;
writable = true;
"guest ok" = true;
In CUPS it shows the syntax for a Windows printer via SAMBA as follows: smb://[workgroup/]server[:port}/printer
The issue is that I don't know what it means by that. I know the print queue, domain, IP, and port (although I'm under the impression that I don't need the port for this case), but I don't know how it would fit into this. I tried looking around on the CUPS wiki but it was vague and confusing to me. Any help with this is much appreciated.
1) Verify CUPS can actually print from that machine
2) If that's your samba config, it seems a bit light
3) Enable guest_ok and see if it works then. If so, you need to delve deeper into your access permissions
documentation.ubuntu.com/serve…
You also just share print targets via CUPS without Samba: cups.org/doc/sharing.html
Set up Samba as a print server
Another common way to network Ubuntu and Windows computers is to configure Samba as a print server. This will allow it to share printers installed on an Ubuntu server, whether locally or over the n...Ubuntu Server
Copenhagen is adapting to a warmer world with rain tunnels and 'sponge parks' | NPR
cross-posted from: slrpnk.net/post/23254942
Copenhagen is adapting to a warmer world with rain tunnels and 'sponge parks'
In Copenhagen, meteorologists predict the city will receive 30% more rainfall by the end of this century.
Oh shit
RXKNephew “ john fetterman “ (Video 2mins)
- YouTube
Profitez des vidéos et de la musique que vous aimez, mettez en ligne des contenus originaux, et partagez-les avec vos amis, vos proches et le monde entier.www.youtube.com
'We're done with Teams': German state hits uninstall on Microsoft
'We're done with Teams': German state hits uninstall on Microsoft
At a time of growing concern over the power of the world's mighty tech companies, one German state is turning its back on US giant Microsoft.France 24 (FRANCE 24)
like this
This article is terrible.
In less than three months' time, almost no civil servant, police officer or judge in Schleswig-Holstein will be using any of Microsoft's ubiquitous programs at work.Instead, the northern state will turn to [an unnamed, gaping information hole] open-source software to "take back control" over data storage and ensure "digital sovereignty", its digitalisation minister, Dirk Schroedter, told AFP.
"We're done with Teams!" he said, referring to Microsoft's messaging and collaboration tool and speaking on a video call -- via an [unnamed, gaping information hole] open-source German program, of course.
What will they use instead? Who the fuck knows! The article omits this crucial piece of information.
And don't say it's TBD; they're not going to say they're "done with Teams" without knowing what they're switching to. Or, even if they haven't put the final nail in the decision, they have a short list.
What will they use instead? Who the fuck knows! The article omits this crucial piece of information.
Whole bunch of shit going by different sources and the state itself from german, to supplement here
MS Office -> LibreOffice
Exchange / Outlook -> Open-XChange / Thunderbird
Sharepoint -> Nextcloud
Windows -> Linux
MS Active Directory -> Unknown, but currently Testing things
Telephones use, among others, Kamailio, RTPEngine, Asterisk, GenieACS, Loki and Grafana
For all the Software to do like specific work, i.e. the software that helps manage industrial permits or whatever, it's case by case with them trying to replace them with mostly web based solutions so they're OS-Agnostic.
They're doing this together with Dataport, which is a sort of special government structure in the sense that it does IT for the states of Schleswig-Holstein, Hamburg, Bremen and Saxony-Anhalt who share the costs. They've been at this whole thing of trying to make a FOSS standard software enviroment for years now, steadily improving, so things might actually be happening. Video conferencing should be Jitsi, that's already in the portfolio, the chat components will in all likelihood be based on the Matrix Protocol which is aswell, I think they offer an offshoot of Riot.
It's a good thing. That said, the way the german government works this only really includes the actual state level bureaucratic engines. Everything at the county and municipal level will also have to make the switch themselves so that's 83 more government entities that would have to do this before the state runs on FOSS.
And like with all of them in germany they're all flat out broke and can't get personnel for this so this type of project, if attempted at all, is usually headed by a 60 year old who's also the equivalent of a CIO because he once built an excel table with pivot functions and the general level of digital competency of the workforce is dire, as in people are printing out excel tables to do the calculations with a calculator and things of that nature.
Thanks! That's all great information.
I'd bet there are a bunch of college students involved in the implementation, too. I don't see ongoing maintenance taking much more manpower than MS; we certainly had dedicated teams for it at my last company, so maybe that will be a budgetary wash, and what they save will be the probably significant licensing.
Thanks. I wonder why both jitsi and Matrix. Someone in the thread said it was too bad Matrix's video conferencing wasn't good enough that they had to add an extra software component, but I wonder what, exactly, the evaluation found wrong with it.
I have a lot of issues with Matrix, but the video conferencing didn't seem worse than the horrible key management.
An external shareholder wouldn't need to create a matrix account just to talk to you.
That's a really good point. I have forgotten whether there are anonymous accounts in Matrix for rooms, but even if so it wouldn't be the same as scheduling a meeting and sending a specific meeting link a-la Zoom.
Yeah, this is the reason.
Ah. Also, such a large organization probably doesn't want to bet the farm on a relatively new and unproven feature.
I'm guessing they have some minimum standards for age and stability.
Not Matrix itself, but the new call mechanism.
They've chosen Matrix; they've just chosen something else for the video calling. Maybe because the anonymous video call link feature is too recent an addition, and is unproven.
HydraVeil VPN: is it a scam?
I'd appreciate any insight ppl can offer, especially relative to mullvad VPN: could a casual privacy valuer benefit from this over mullvad now or in the future?
Has anyone seen this one listed on VPN comparison sites?
Same:
They take straight monero and generate accounts from no personal info
Pros:
It's something like 1$/device/mo, so sometimes cheaper than mullvad.
Doesn't use gmail or centralized servers like mullvad, argued here; went over my head
Something about improving browser privacy
Cons:
Beta; small project; haven't found credible endorsements
Free the internet. With Mullvad VPN.
Your IP address is used to identify you, track you, and map your online life. Step 1 in taking back your personal privacy online is masking it with a trustworthy VPN.Mullvad VPN
If you're a casual privacy user, then accepting monero and making accounts with no personal info isn't really something to be concerned about having.
Instead I would use a well known VPN with audits done that is shown to not hold logs, like Mullvad.
Andrew Cuomo Takes a Beating on Live TV
Andrew Cuomo Takes a Beating on Live TV
Full debate coverage, plus more links to start your weekend.Hell Gate
Deficit Between a $35/hr Federal Minimum Wage and Cost of Living of US States
Out of curiosity, I wanted to see what a reasonable federal minimum wage might look like if implemented.
Looking at historical information from a time when a single individual’s income could support a family of four, I settled at the late 1950s.
The minimum wage in 1956 was finally raised to one whole dollar, the equivalent of about $12 today by raw inflation. However, its key to remember that this was an era when women were not paid on par with men, and when children younger than 13 commonly were in the workforce.
So instead I found average wage and salary numbers for 1958. In 1958, the average among all adult male wages was $4,888, and salaried men (doctors, lawyers, etc not included) averaged $6,514. Taking the salary figure and adjusting it for inflation gives you roughly $72k, or close to $35/hr.
If the average person had anywhere near the purchasing power of an individual in 1958, then no one could be making less than $35 per hour for their labor. Effectively, to return people to that level of financial security this is what it would take, while everything would simultaneously have to remain the same price. Meaning this wage increase would necessarily have to come out of the pockets of shareholders/owners.
The map shows quite clearly that even with such a high minimum wage, it would still be unaffordable in 100% of the country on 40 hours of work per week alone.
Trickle down economics have doomed this country on a path toward economic ruin, and have pushed most people in the US to such a precarious point financially that they have no hope of living as comfortably as the average worker in 1958. The average salaried worker today earns just $61k per year, over $10k shy of what the average worker made back in the day. Meanwhile, the cost of goods and services are astronomically higher.
$1 in 1956 bought you 4 gallons of gasoline. I pay $20 for that, even though by raw inflation the dollar is worth $12 today. Although gas is highly influenced by many factors that are unstable.
In the late 1950s, a cheap American car cost about $14k. The equivalent of over $168k today by inflation. By average salary, an individual could buy a car within 3-4 years easily by saving intentionally for it. At modern wages, this would be impossible. At $72k per year it becomes about as feasible as it was back then to reach that $168k mark.
These rough concepts are how I landed on $35 per hour as an appropriate measure. As well as the fact that wages today are almost entirely earned by adults, considering modern labor laws and the decline of the teenage workforce.
adhocfungus likes this.
I wonder if this is influenced by the fact the worst states on this map tend to have the best welfare?
Like as a disabled person on social security in Massachusetts you get a bunch of things like energy payments and carer payments you would not get in Arkansas.
🍹 Log Out @ Roma
Martedì 24 giugno ci vediamo a Garbatella con il Logout di TWC Roma, il ritrovo per tech worker che vogliono incontrarsi dopo lavoro: un'occasione per socializzare, conoscersi, parlare del nostro lavoro e come organizzarci nei prossimi mesi!
Ci vediamo martedì 24 giugno, alle 19.15, alla birreria 568 di Garbatella!
Unisciti al Gruppo telegram!
reshared this
Il mondo finisce ad oriente.
Stavolta il post è lungo.
E' il brutto di lavorare a turni: il tempo per scrivere, se vuoi, si trova.
Ciò che sta accadendo tra #Israele ed #Iran ci porta sempre più vicino al punto di non ritorno.
Forse per questo mi sono dilungato.
Abbiate pazienza.
___
Il mondo finisce ad Oriente.
(168)
Nota: Lo so, non è da me farla così lunga, ma in un mondo che impazzisce forse un pochino di squilibrio ce lo metto anche io. La verità è che la #Pace è davvero impossibile. Almeno così sembra. Il che rende, fondamentalmente, questo uno sfogo. Ci vuole pazienza.
La notte tra il 12 e il 13 giugno 2025 ha visto l'ennesima escalation del conflitto mediorientale, quando #Israele ha lanciato un massiccio attacco aereo contro l' #Iran, mirato principalmente alle strutture nucleari e militari di Teheran. Le forze israeliane hanno colpito siti sensibili, distruggendo laboratori e centri di ricerca, nonché eliminando alcuni tra i principali comandanti delle Guardie della Rivoluzione, l'élite militare iraniana. Un colpo che ha scatenato una serie di reazioni internazionali. L'Iran, come prevedibile, ha replicato con una serie di droni che hanno tentato di colpire obiettivi strategici in Israele, gettando il paese in una nuova spirale di violenza.
Le parole di #DonaldTrump, che ha immediatamente espresso un sostegno incondizionato all'azione israeliana, hanno ulteriormente polarizzato il dibattito internazionale. Trump ha minacciato l'Iran con nuove offensive se non avesse accettato un accordo sul nucleare, aggiungendo così un ulteriore strato di complessità alla già tesa situazione geopolitica. L’appoggio degli Stati Uniti alla politica aggressiva di Israele sembra segnare il punto di non ritorno di un conflitto che ha radici profonde, alimentato da ideologie contrapposte e da interessi strategici divergenti.
Politicamente, l'attacco israeliano ha reso evidente l'intensificarsi della guerra a bassa intensità tra le potenze regionali. Israele, con la sua operazione “Leone Ascendente”, ha voluto chiarire una volta per tutte che non tollererà il programma nucleare iraniano, ritenuto una minaccia per la propria sicurezza nazionale. Questo attacco ha avuto l'effetto di indebolire momentaneamente l'Iran, uccidendo alcuni dei suoi strateghi più esperti e decimando parte delle sue capacità operative. Tuttavia, la risposta dell'Iran non si è fatta attendere: il lancio di droni ha avuto il chiaro intento di far capire a Israele che ogni azione avrà una controparte, anche se le capacità belliche di Teheran, pur impressionanti, non possono in alcun modo paragonarsi alla potenza di fuoco israeliana.
Le implicazioni politiche per il Medio Oriente sono incalcolabili. L'Iran ha immediatamente mobilitato le sue milizie alleate in Siria, Libano e Iraq, preparando il terreno per una possibile guerra per procura che potrebbe estendersi ben oltre i confini dei due paesi coinvolti. In questo scenario, la comunità internazionale rischia di assistere a una polarizzazione crescente, con i paesi arabi che, pur condannando l’aggressione israeliana, non sembrano disposti a schierarsi apertamente a favore di Teheran, temendo le ripercussioni di un allineamento troppo esplicito.
Moralmente, invece, l'attacco israeliano solleva interrogativi inquietanti sulla legittimità di un'azione preventiva, soprattutto quando si considera che l'Iran ha sempre sostenuto di non avere intenzioni belliche dirette contro Israele. Sebbene Israele possa giustificare il suo intervento come una misura di difesa preventiva, non si può ignorare la violazione della sovranità iraniana e il fatto che l’attacco possa generare un'ulteriore spirale di violenza e vendetta. La morte di alti ufficiali iraniani e scienziati nucleari potrebbe, inoltre, rafforzare la narrativa del martirio e alimentare il risentimento tra la popolazione iraniana, creando un ulteriore fossato tra l'Iran e l'Occidente.
Da un punto di vista etico, sorge anche la questione dell’equilibrio delle forze: mentre gli Stati Uniti e Israele vedono la sicurezza come una priorità assoluta, l'Iran non può fare a meno di difendere ciò che considera un diritto sovrano, ossia la propria capacità di autodefinirsi come potenza regionale. La domanda che sorge spontanea è quindi se la logica della deterrenza, che ha caratterizzato la guerra fredda, possa essere applicata efficacemente in un contesto così volatile e intrinsecamente pericoloso.
L'operazione ha accentuato le divisioni interne in Iran, dove il regime potrebbe trovarsi a fronteggiare un'ondata di proteste interne. La crisi economica che affligge Teheran, le sanzioni internazionali e il crescente malcontento popolare potrebbero minare ulteriormente la stabilità del governo. Tuttavia, un sentimento di orgoglio nazionale potrebbe temporaneamente consolidare il consenso interno contro l'invasore straniero, come spesso accade in contesti bellici.
In Europa, la situazione appare delicata. L'Unione Europea, da sempre promotrice di un approccio diplomatico e pacifico, si trova ora a dover navigare tra due fuochi: la necessità di mantenere relazioni economiche con l'Iran, e l'alleanza con Israele, che rappresenta uno dei suoi principali partner strategici. La Francia e la Germania hanno condannato l'escalation, chiedendo una de-escalation immediata, ma non sono riuscite a offrire una soluzione concreta. L'Italia, pur allineata in linea di principio con le posizioni europee, ha adottato un tono più cauto, sottolineando la necessità di una mediazione internazionale urgente per evitare che il conflitto degeneri in una guerra totale.
Il nostro stato si è trovato a giocare un ruolo delicato nel bilanciare il proprio supporto a Israele con l’esigenza di non alienarsi la cooperazione iraniana. Sebbene il governo italiano abbia espresso una condanna per l'aggressione israeliana, si è anche preoccupato delle implicazioni a lungo termine di una rottura totale tra l'Iran e l'Occidente. L'Italia, infatti, è da sempre favorevole a un approccio diplomatico per risolvere la crisi nucleare iraniana, e un’escalation militare potrebbe compromettere gli sforzi compiuti negli anni passati per stabilire un dialogo.
L’Unione Europea, nel suo insieme, ha rilasciato dichiarazioni ufficiali invocando una “de-escalation immediata”, ma la divisione tra i membri più favorevoli a un duro confronto (come la Polonia) e quelli più favorevoli a un negoziato (come l’Italia e la Spagna) è ormai palese. Il rischio è che l'Europa, incapace di adottare una linea unitaria, finisca per essere marginalizzata in un conflitto che potrebbe ridisegnare gli equilibri di potere nell'intera regione mediorientale.
L'attacco israeliano all'Iran ha profondamente scosso gli assetti geopolitici internazionali, mettendo in luce non solo le fragilità politiche e sociali dei protagonisti del conflitto, ma anche la difficoltà di una comunità internazionale a trovare un punto di mediazione efficace. Le conseguenze politiche, morali e sociali di questa nuova escalation sono ancora in divenire, ma una cosa è certa: l'Europa e l'Italia dovranno affrontare con urgenza la necessità di rinnovare i propri approcci diplomatici, se vogliono evitare che il conflitto si trasformi in una guerra su scala globale. La strada verso una stabilizzazione del Medio Oriente sembra sempre più incerta e tortuosa, e l'unica speranza risiede nel ritorno al dialogo e alla cooperazione internazionale.
#Blog #Iran #Israele #Medioriente #War #Guerra #Opinioni #Politica #Politics
Mastodon: @alda7069@mastodon.unoTelegram: t.me/transitblogFriendica: @danmatt@poliverso.orgBio Site (tutto in un posto solo, diamine): bio.site/danielemattioli
Gli scritti sono tutelati da “Creative Commons” (qui)
Tutte le opinioni qui riportate sono da considerarsi personali. Per eventuali problemi riscontrati con i testi, si prega di scrivere a: corubomatt@gmail.com
Il mondo finisce ad Oriente.
**Stavolta il post è lungo.
E' il brutto di lavorare a turni: il tempo per scrivere, se vuoi, si trova.
Ciò che sta accadendo tra #Israele ed #Iran ci porta sempre più vicino al punto di non ritorno.
Forse per questo mi sono dilungato.
Abbiate pazienza. **
Il mondo finisce ad Oriente.
(168)
Nota: Lo so, non è da me farla così lunga, ma in un mondo che impazzisce forse un pochino di squilibrio ce lo metto anche io. La verità è che la #Pace è davvero impossibile. Almeno così sembra. Il che rende, fondamentalmente, questo uno sfogo. Ci vuole pazienza.
La notte tra il 12 e il 13 giugno 2025 ha visto l'ennesima escalation del conflitto mediorientale, quando #Israele ha lanciato un massiccio attacco aereo contro l' #Iran, mirato principalmente alle strutture nucleari e militari di Teheran. Le forze israeliane hanno colpito siti sensibili, distruggendo laboratori e centri di ricerca, nonché eliminando alcuni tra i principali comandanti delle Guardie della Rivoluzione, l'élite militare iraniana. Un colpo che ha scatenato una serie di reazioni internazionali. L'Iran, come prevedibile, ha replicato con una serie di droni che hanno tentato di colpire obiettivi strategici in Israele, gettando il paese in una nuova spirale di violenza.
Le parole di #DonaldTrump, che ha immediatamente espresso un sostegno incondizionato all'azione israeliana, hanno ulteriormente polarizzato il dibattito internazionale. Trump ha minacciato l'Iran con nuove offensive se non avesse accettato un accordo sul nucleare, aggiungendo così un ulteriore strato di complessità alla già tesa situazione geopolitica. L’appoggio degli Stati Uniti alla politica aggressiva di Israele sembra segnare il punto di non ritorno di un conflitto che ha radici profonde, alimentato da ideologie contrapposte e da interessi strategici divergenti.
Politicamente, l'attacco israeliano ha reso evidente l'intensificarsi della guerra a bassa intensità tra le potenze regionali. Israele, con la sua operazione “Leone Ascendente”, ha voluto chiarire una volta per tutte che non tollererà il programma nucleare iraniano, ritenuto una minaccia per la propria sicurezza nazionale. Questo attacco ha avuto l'effetto di indebolire momentaneamente l'Iran, uccidendo alcuni dei suoi strateghi più esperti e decimando parte delle sue capacità operative. Tuttavia, la risposta dell'Iran non si è fatta attendere: il lancio di droni ha avuto il chiaro intento di far capire a Israele che ogni azione avrà una controparte, anche se le capacità belliche di Teheran, pur impressionanti, non possono in alcun modo paragonarsi alla potenza di fuoco israeliana.
Le implicazioni politiche per il Medio Oriente sono incalcolabili. L'Iran ha immediatamente mobilitato le sue milizie alleate in Siria, Libano e Iraq, preparando il terreno per una possibile guerra per procura che potrebbe estendersi ben oltre i confini dei due paesi coinvolti. In questo scenario, la comunità internazionale rischia di assistere a una polarizzazione crescente, con i paesi arabi che, pur condannando l’aggressione israeliana, non sembrano disposti a schierarsi apertamente a favore di Teheran, temendo le ripercussioni di un allineamento troppo esplicito.
Moralmente, invece, l'attacco israeliano solleva interrogativi inquietanti sulla legittimità di un'azione preventiva, soprattutto quando si considera che l'Iran ha sempre sostenuto di non avere intenzioni belliche dirette contro Israele. Sebbene Israele possa giustificare il suo intervento come una misura di difesa preventiva, non si può ignorare la violazione della sovranità iraniana e il fatto che l’attacco possa generare un'ulteriore spirale di violenza e vendetta. La morte di alti ufficiali iraniani e scienziati nucleari potrebbe, inoltre, rafforzare la narrativa del martirio e alimentare il risentimento tra la popolazione iraniana, creando un ulteriore fossato tra l'Iran e l'Occidente.
Da un punto di vista etico, sorge anche la questione dell’equilibrio delle forze: mentre gli Stati Uniti e Israele vedono la sicurezza come una priorità assoluta, l'Iran non può fare a meno di difendere ciò che considera un diritto sovrano, ossia la propria capacità di autodefinirsi come potenza regionale. La domanda che sorge spontanea è quindi se la logica della deterrenza, che ha caratterizzato la guerra fredda, possa essere applicata efficacemente in un contesto così volatile e intrinsecamente pericoloso.
L'operazione ha accentuato le divisioni interne in Iran, dove il regime potrebbe trovarsi a fronteggiare un'ondata di proteste interne. La crisi economica che affligge Teheran, le sanzioni internazionali e il crescente malcontento popolare potrebbero minare ulteriormente la stabilità del governo. Tuttavia, un sentimento di orgoglio nazionale potrebbe temporaneamente consolidare il consenso interno contro l'invasore straniero, come spesso accade in contesti bellici.
In Europa, la situazione appare delicata. L'Unione Europea, da sempre promotrice di un approccio diplomatico e pacifico, si trova ora a dover navigare tra due fuochi: la necessità di mantenere relazioni economiche con l'Iran, e l'alleanza con Israele, che rappresenta uno dei suoi principali partner strategici. La Francia e la Germania hanno condannato l'escalation, chiedendo una de-escalation immediata, ma non sono riuscite a offrire una soluzione concreta. L'Italia, pur allineata in linea di principio con le posizioni europee, ha adottato un tono più cauto, sottolineando la necessità di una mediazione internazionale urgente per evitare che il conflitto degeneri in una guerra totale.
Il nostro stato si è trovato a giocare un ruolo delicato nel bilanciare il proprio supporto a Israele con l’esigenza di non alienarsi la cooperazione iraniana. Sebbene il governo italiano abbia espresso una condanna per l'aggressione israeliana, si è anche preoccupato delle implicazioni a lungo termine di una rottura totale tra l'Iran e l'Occidente. L'Italia, infatti, è da sempre favorevole a un approccio diplomatico per risolvere la crisi nucleare iraniana, e un’escalation militare potrebbe compromettere gli sforzi compiuti negli anni passati per stabilire un dialogo.
L’Unione Europea, nel suo insieme, ha rilasciato dichiarazioni ufficiali invocando una “de-escalation immediata”, ma la divisione tra i membri più favorevoli a un duro confronto (come la Polonia) e quelli più favorevoli a un negoziato (come l’Italia e la Spagna) è ormai palese. Il rischio è che l'Europa, incapace di adottare una linea unitaria, finisca per essere marginalizzata in un conflitto che potrebbe ridisegnare gli equilibri di potere nell'intera regione mediorientale.
L'attacco israeliano all'Iran ha profondamente scosso gli assetti geopolitici internazionali, mettendo in luce non solo le fragilità politiche e sociali dei protagonisti del conflitto, ma anche la difficoltà di una comunità internazionale a trovare un punto di mediazione efficace. Le conseguenze politiche, morali e sociali di questa nuova escalation sono ancora in divenire, ma una cosa è certa: l'Europa e l'Italia dovranno affrontare con urgenza la necessità di rinnovare i propri approcci diplomatici, se vogliono evitare che il conflitto si trasformi in una guerra su scala globale. La strada verso una stabilizzazione del Medio Oriente sembra sempre più incerta e tortuosa, e l'unica speranza risiede nel ritorno al dialogo e alla cooperazione internazionale.
#Blog #Iran #Israele #Medioriente #War #Guerra #Opinioni #Politica #Politics
Mastodon: @alda7069@mastodon.unoTelegram: t.me/transitblogFriendica: @danmatt@poliverso.orgBio Site (tutto in un posto solo, diamine): bio.site/danielemattioli
Gli scritti sono tutelati da “Creative Commons” (qui)
Tutte le opinioni qui riportate sono da considerarsi personali. Per eventuali problemi riscontrati con i testi, si prega di scrivere a: corubomatt@gmail.com
Logo Voting Round 1 is Complete!
Logo Voting Round 1 is Complete!
Thank you to everyone who participated in the first round of the logo voting! Your engagement and feedback have been incredible, and we're excited to share the results.
Top 6 Logos
The logos that received the most votes:
- “CO-Arrow”
- “CoMaps Arrow”
- “Windy-Road-Pin"
- "Co Compass"
- "Clouds/continents arrow"
- "CM-Compass-Split"
Next Step
These logos will now undergo a refinement process, to iterate and improve the designs. See codeberg.org/comaps/Governance…
Final Vote
Once the final versions are complete, the final round of voting will open. This will be your chance to choose the final logo that will represent CoMaps.
Together, we're building something amazing, and we can't wait to see the final logo that you help create!
Logo finalist iteration, input, enhancements
### Logo Voting Round 1 is Complete! Thank you to everyone who participated in the first round of the logo voting! Your engagement and feedback have been incredible, and we're excited to share the results.Codeberg.org
adhocfungus likes this.
Still getting Subscribe Pending trying to federate new instance
I've got my own instance running and I want to federate with some instances and communities but I'm getting a Subscribe Pending error. I read everything I could find on this error but the fix on github from like a year or two ago didn't work.
For context, I got the instance running on server A, then tried to federate with a few communities. Then I moved the instance to server B, which was more stable, and then tried to federate again.
The domain is the same just literally rsynced the files to another server and got the container up.
I'm ready to commit to Lemmy full time and leave reddit. Any ideas? What am I doing wrong?
I'm running 0.19.11 for context, with caddy as my reverse proxy.
Edit: Even further context. This issue is happening on communites on instances that I had not trie to federate previously.
- lemmy.world
- sh.itjust.works
- beehaw.org
- programming.dev
Lemmy Federate
Lemmy Federate is a tool to federate new communities in the Lemmyverse.lemmy-federate.com
On my little instance “pending” usually just means that the server is loading…
It resolves itself after a bit of time.
Maybe using fediseer.com/ could also help
Taj Mahal & Keb Mo - Room On The Porch (2025)
Taj Mahal & Keb Mo - Room On The Porch (2025)
di Marcello Matranga Qualche tempo fa Taj Mahal ebbe a dichiarare: “Se si toglie l’impronta africana dalla musica occidentale degli ultimi ...Silvano Bottaro (Blogger)
Nu Genea - Bar Mediterraneo (2022)
Il Bar Mediterraneo dei Nu Genea è l’idea di uno spazio comune, dove le persone si incontrano e si fondono. Un luogo con le porte sempre aperte ai viandanti e alle loro vite, sempre esposte ai capricci della sorte. Lo si prova ascoltando la moltitudine di suoni che caratterizzano i brani: strati di strumenti acustici, voci e sintetizzatori che si uniscono in una miscela unica di timbri.
Aprendo alle voci di tanti popoli diversi, separati dalle lingue ma uniti dal mare e dalla musica, la Napoli dei Nu Genea si fa vero luogo d’incontro. Si sente nei versi tunisini e nel flauto Ney di Marzouk Mejiri che spezzano il cuore di malinconia in Gelbi; nel canto dell’artista Marco Castello che, in Rire, attraversa lo Stretto di Messina per donarsi alle agrodolci parole di Napoli; nei versi francesi di Célia Kameni che sfilano sinuosi tra i vicoli di Marechià; o ancora nella batteria del compianto Tony Allen che accompagna i mandolini di Straniero.
La passione dei Nu Genea per la cultura napoletana si espande in questo album attraverso l’adattamento di una poesia del 1931 di Raffaele Viviani, le cui parole cantate da Fabiana Martone si posano sul pacato groove jazz-funk di La Crisi. La stessa ricerca si nota anche nei versi di Vesuvio, una rilettura per il dance floor di una canzone folk napoletana degli ‘E Zezi, storica band operaia di Pomigliano D’Arco: qui, i Nu Genea, hanno registrato le voci di un coro di bambini di Napoli, che aggiunge alla canzone una dimensione tribale e insieme evocativa.
Il disco è stato anticipato dal singolo Tienaté, dove la potenza vocale di Fabiana Martone si unisce con sintetizzatori ed archi, impregnandoli con le matrici musicali del Sud-Est del Mediterraneo.
Da Il nuovo album Bar Mediterraneo - carosello records.com
NU GENEA - IL NUOVO ALBUM "BAR MEDITERRANEO"
A quattro anni da “Nuova Napoli”, i Nu Genea tornano con “Bar Mediterraneo” disponibile da oggi su tutte le piattaforme digitali (NG Records su licenza Carosello Records).www.carosellorecords.com
Poesia anarchica e impegno civile in Fondamenti di Utopia di Daniele Fiorenza
Indice dei contenuti
Toggle
- Fondamenti di Utopia di Daniele Fiorenza
- Struttura del libro: due anime, un’unica voce di resistenza
- Temi centrali: rabbia, insubordinazione e solidarietà
- Stile e linguaggio
- Poesie esemplari da non dimenticare
- Versi che lasciano il segno
- Oltre lo steccato: la poesia per Cutro
- Per (Gino) Strada: il lutto che si fa lotta
- Altri testi emblematici
- Valore politico e culturale dell’opera
- L’utopia come orizzonte possibile
Fondamenti di Utopia
Daniele Fiorenza
silloge poetica
Youcanprint
23 maggio 2025
60
store.youcanprint.it/fondament…
“Fondamenti di Utopia” di Daniele Fiorenza è una raccolta di poesia militante che non cerca compromessi, ma colpisce dritto al cuore dell’ingiustizia. Versi potenti che incitano alla disobbedienza e alla lotta, svelando le ipocrisie del potere e celebrando l’urgenza di un’utopia concreta. Un’opera che brucia di rabbia lucida e solidarietà, perfetta per chi cerca una voce autentica e ribelle nella poesia contemporanea.
Fondamenti di Utopia di Daniele Fiorenza
Una raccolta di poesia sociale, politica e ribelle
“Fondamenti di Utopia” di Daniele Fiorenza non è una semplice raccolta di versi; è un manifesto poetico, un grido di disobbedienza che non ammette compromessi. Lontano dal lirismo fine a sé stesso, ogni parola è un colpo diretto al cuore dell’ingiustizia, inserendosi con forza nel solco della poesia anarchica e militante. È una voce che incarna un’urgenza profonda, sia personale che collettiva: quella di rompere il silenzio, di reagire e di lottare.
Qui, la poesia sociale prende corpo, si fa rabbia visione audace. Le parole si trasformano in strumenti di liberazione, torce accese in una notte di indifferenza. Fiorenza non si limita a denunciare o a raccontare; egli immagina, ma soprattutto incita: a non cedere alla rassegnazione, a custodire la memoria, a rifiutare la delega, a riconquistare dignità, tempo e spazio. Come recita un verso emblematico della raccolta, “l’utopia non è un’illusione, è un orizzonte in fiamme da raggiungere con le mani sporche di vita e il cuore libero da catene.”
Daniele Fiorenza, figura attiva nell’ambito anarchico come membro del collettivo intersezionale ControCultura e collaboratore del blog Magozine.it, infonde nella sua opera una profonda consapevolezza sociale e politica.
Apre il volume l’introduzione di Franco Schirone, libero ricercatore la cui profonda conoscenza della storia dell’anarchismo e dell’anarcosindacalismo è testimoniata da opere come “La Resistenza sconosciuta” e “Per la Rivoluzione Sociale. Gli anarchici nella Resistenza a Milano”.
Struttura del libro: due anime, un’unica voce di resistenza
La raccolta si articola in due sezioni distinte, eppure intrinsecamente connesse, che riflettono la duplice natura del progetto poetico: da un lato la rabbia collettiva, dall’altro la radice personale e territoriale. Entrambe le anime si fondono in un’unica, potente voce di resistenza.
- Oltre lo steccato: Il Fronte Lirico Politico e Sociale Questa prima parte si presenta come un vero e proprio assalto lirico ai centri del potere. Le poesie di “Oltre lo steccato” denunciano con veemenza le violenze sistemiche, lo sfruttamento indiscriminato, il razzismo dilagante, il cinismo mediatico, la repressione statale e le inquietanti complicità tra poteri economici e religiosi. La scrittura è diretta, impellente, pensata per scuotere le coscienze. Qui la poesia politica diventa autentico linguaggio di lotta, la poesia libertaria uno strumento di disvelamento, e la poesia di denuncia sociale si erge a voce corale degli emarginati. I versi sono colpi precisi contro le gabbie ideologiche, inviti a insorgere, testimonianze di un’umanità ferita ma indomita.
- Radici: Un Viaggio nell’Identità, Territorio e Coscienza Anarchica Nella seconda sezione, “Radici”, il tono muta, ma l’intensità non diminuisce. È un viaggio più intimo, che si immerge nel vissuto personale, nel legame profondo con la terra d’origine e nella memoria familiare e storica. Le poesie esplorano il significato complesso dell’essere anarchici nel mondo contemporaneo, frammentato e spesso disorientante, partendo da un’identità meridionale troppo spesso oggetto di marginalizzazione e stereotipi. È una poesia personale che non rinuncia alla lotta, ma la nutre di una consapevolezza radicata, di un senso di appartenenza e di un amore tenace per tutto ciò che resiste: luoghi, volti, storie. La radice, in questo contesto, non è un mero rifugio, ma uno slancio vitale verso un futuro da reinventare, libero da ogni forma di padronanza e confine.
Temi centrali: rabbia, insubordinazione e solidarietà
Le poesie di “Fondamenti di Utopia” sono animate da una rabbia lucida, da un’insubordinazione consapevole e da un profondo senso di solidarietà umana e politica. I temi affrontati attraversano i conflitti sociali del presente con un linguaggio tagliente e radicale, senza mai perdere l’empatia verso chi subisce l’oppressione.
L’opera è una denuncia frontale al potere in tutte le sue manifestazioni: economico, statale, religioso, patriarcale. La poesia anticapitalista di Fiorenza svela impietosamente le interconnessioni tra dominio e complicità mediatica, tra profitto e devastazione sociale. In testi come “Il titolista”, “Padrone bianco, lavoro nero” o “Insorgiamo”, la rabbia si trasforma in strumento di lotta, la parola in barricata. Le condizioni di sfruttamento dei lavoratori, il razzismo istituzionale, la criminalizzazione del dissenso vengono smascherati con versi duri e visionari, all’interno di un progetto poetico che è anche una lotta sociale dichiarata.
Fiorenza intesse con forza la memoria storica con le tragedie contemporanee: dalla strage di Cutro alla Palestina, dalla Resistenza antifascista alle lotte per i diritti dei migranti. La poesia diventa così un atto di attivismo culturale, capace di resistere al tempo e di decifrarlo. In componimenti come “Oltre lo steccato” (dedicata a Cutro), “Umani nel vento”, “Garibaldi, che hai fatto!”, l’autore rilegge la storia dal basso, con uno sguardo profondamente antifascista, decentrato e solidale. È un invito a ricordare, ma anche ad agire: la poesia, qui, è una voce collettiva che reclama giustizia e dignità per ogni essere umano.
Stile e linguaggio
Il tratto distintivo di “Fondamenti di Utopia” è senza dubbio il suo linguaggio diretto, popolare, viscerale, che si nutre di ironia pungente, sarcasmo dissacrante e una spiccata musicalità. Daniele Fiorenza non edulcora né abbellisce; la sua scrittura mira a ferire l’indifferenza, a strappare il lettore dalla comodità del giudizio passivo. La sua voce poetica è tagliente e militante, eppure profondamente umana, modulandosi con efficacia sulle diverse sfumature del vissuto.
Tra dialetto, ironia e forza musicale
L’inserimento del dialetto calabrese in alcuni componimenti, come “E ritorno alla lira” o “Oltre lo steccato”, non è una mera scelta linguistica, ma un vero e proprio atto politico, un richiamo viscerale alla terra, alla marginalità e alla dignità di chi è stato storicamente escluso. Il tono è spesso ironico, parodico, dissacrante, come emerge chiaramente in poesie quali “Il titolista” o “Armando Zecconia”, dove la comicità si tramuta in feroce denuncia.
La musicalità dei testi, evidente anche nelle “cover poetiche” ispirate a canzoni popolari come “La canzone del bambino nel vento” o “Il pescatore”, rafforza il legame con l’oralità e la tradizione popolare. Questo approccio rende la raccolta un contributo originale nel panorama della poesia contemporanea italiana, rifiutando l’accademismo e schierandosi apertamente dalla parte degli ultimi.
Poesie esemplari da non dimenticare
Versi che lasciano il segno
In Fondamenti di Utopia ci sono testi che si imprimono con forza nella memoria, veri e propri emblemi di una poesia sociale d’autore capace di restituire senso alla parola “impegno”. Alcune poesie si ergono come monoliti: documenti emotivi, storici e politici di un presente che brucia sotto i nostri occhi.
Oltre lo steccato: la poesia per Cutro
Tra le più toccanti, Oltre lo steccato è una poesia scritta in dialetto calabrese e dedicata alla strage di Cutro. Il testo mescola disperazione, denuncia e lirismo amaro. L’uso del dialetto non è solo stilistico: diventa carne e territorio, dolore e identità. È un lamento funebre e una rivolta, un’accusa contro le responsabilità istituzionali e l’indifferenza sociale. Non è solo poesia per ricordare, ma per non permettere che l’orrore venga normalizzato.
Per (Gino) Strada: il lutto che si fa lotta
Un altro testo memorabile è “Per (Gino) Strada”, omaggio a una delle figure più radicalmente umanitarie del nostro tempo. Fiorenza scrive con affetto, rabbia e gratitudine, evitando qualsiasi retorica. La poesia smaschera l’ipocrisia dei politicanti che disprezzano in vita ciò che celebrano ipocritamente dopo la morte. È un testo che commuove, ma anche scuote, ricordandoci che la coerenza ha un costo, e che la vera eredità di Strada risiede nelle mani di chi continua a disobbedire con amore.
Altri testi emblematici
La settimana santa, Insorgiamo, Il titolista o Alla fiera ammazzagenti sono altri esempi potenti di una poesia che non si accontenta di raccontare: grida, accusa, rifiuta. In ognuno di questi componimenti, Fiorenza mostra come la poesia possa ancora essere atto politico, strumento di memoria, voce collettiva.
Valore politico e culturale dell’opera
Poesia come strumento di trasformazione
Fondamenti di Utopia non è solo una raccolta poetica: è una dichiarazione di intenti, un terreno fertile dove la poesia e l’impegno civile si intrecciano in modo indissolubile. Daniele Fiorenza non scrive per abbellire il mondo, ma per trasformarlo. I suoi versi non cercano consenso, ma coscienza. Ogni poesia è una crepa aperta nel muro dell’indifferenza, un invito a riscoprire la forza del dissenso.
In questo senso, l’opera apre una prospettiva culturale rilevante nel panorama della poesia politica italiana contemporanea, fungendo anche da strumento pratico di riflessione e azione. Il richiamo all’autogestione e al rifiuto della delega è costante: la voce lirica incita a prendere parola, a organizzarsi, a resistere al potere che disgrega e divide. La poesia diventa così azione collettiva, gesto comunitario, possibilità concreta di costruire un’alternativa.
Verso un’utopia politica concreta
Quella che Fiorenza propone non è un’utopia astratta, ma un orizzonte di lotta da raggiungere con “le mani sporche di vita”. Le sue poesie richiamano la giustizia sociale, la dignità dei lavoratori, la solidarietà tra oppressi, ma anche la libertà come pratica quotidiana, l’antifascismo come dovere etico, la comunità come risposta al disfacimento individualista.
In un tempo in cui il linguaggio è spesso neutralizzato dal marketing o ridotto a slogan di propaganda, Fondamenti di Utopia restituisce alla parola la sua carica più sovversiva: quella di poter cambiare il mondo. Con dolore, sì, ma anche con ostinata speranza.
L’utopia come orizzonte possibile
La poesia come atto di insorgenza
Fondamenti di Utopia è un libro che non si limita a descrivere il mondo com’è, ma si ostina a immaginare come potrebbe essere. In un presente segnato da fratture, disuguaglianze e paure normalizzate, la poesia di Daniele Fiorenza si fa insorgenza consapevole: non urla nel vuoto, ma prende posizione, semina visioni, apre passaggi.
Qui la resistenza attraverso la poesia non è una metafora, ma una pratica concreta: ogni verso oppone il gesto creativo alla violenza sistemica, ogni parola cerca di strappare la realtà all’apatia. L’utopia politica evocata non è evasione, ma tensione concreta verso una trasformazione radicale, da costruire con lucidità e determinazione, giorno dopo giorno.
In un tempo in cui anche l’immaginazione sembra colonizzata, Fondamenti di Utopia difende il diritto di sognare con i piedi piantati nella terra. È un libro che non si legge soltanto: si attraversa, si ascolta, si porta con sé. E ci ricorda, senza retorica, che la poesia militante non ha bisogno di alzare la voce per farsi sentire. Basta che continui a dire la verità.
#anarchia #poesia #PoesiaContemporanea
Poesia anarchica e impegno civile in Fondamenti di Utopia di Daniele Fiorenza
Poesia anarchica e impegno civile in Fondamenti di Utopia di Daniele Fiorenza - Recensioni libri - Il Mago di OzFrancesco Scatigno (Magozine.it)
Il blogverso italiano di Wordpress reshared this.
Kremlin-friendly Media Paint US Protests As 'Chaos' And 'Color Revolutions'
Kremlin-friendly Media Paint US Protests As 'Chaos' And 'Color Revolutions'
Russian media are describing protests in Los Angeles over immigration crackdowns and the deployment of the National Guard as "fighting, violence, and provocations.RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty
American here, I can tell that most of the hysteria surrounding these protests is just that: hysteria.
It amazes me how many people are attacking my country because of what they see going on in places like LA and New York. It reveals how little they know about the US and how easy they succumb to mob mentality.
Right now, hating on the US is cool and there are no shortage of "influencers" who are profiting off of convincing people things are worse than they actually are.
happybadger [he/him]
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •like this
geneva_convenience likes this.
YappyMonotheist
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •DontMakeMoreBabies
in reply to YappyMonotheist • • •YappyMonotheist
in reply to DontMakeMoreBabies • • •DontMakeMoreBabies
in reply to YappyMonotheist • • •YappyMonotheist
in reply to DontMakeMoreBabies • • •mesitoispro
in reply to DontMakeMoreBabies • • •Depending on your understanding, the concept of god can be very real.
It's not a uniform idea across cultures and beliefs.
Kbobabob
in reply to mesitoispro • • •IttihadChe
in reply to DontMakeMoreBabies • • •As the Iranians are shouting currently:
"Allahu Akbar!"
humanspiral
in reply to IttihadChe • • •IttihadChe
in reply to humanspiral • • •It's a widespread Islamic phrase but yes it stems from Arabic it means "God is greatest" and is often chanted in celebrations in Iran (and anywhere else with high Islamic influence)
Many Muslims will use Arabic for certain religious/symbolic purposes regardless of native language as the Quran was revealed in Arabic so it holds special purpose and unites the global Islamic community as they all can understand such phrases no matter where they live/which language they speak.
As I posted the above comment there were reports of Iranians shouting it to each other from the rooftops and thousands taking to the streets in groups to chant it despite the threat of Israeli attacks to celebrate Irans successful retaliation.
LaserTurboShark69
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •FunkyStuff [he/him]
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •geneva_convenience
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •- YouTube
www.youtube.comBigMacHole
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •Frenchfryenjoyer (she/her)
in reply to BigMacHole • • •geneva_convenience
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •BodyBySisyphus [he/him]
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •Kuori [she/her]
in reply to BodyBySisyphus [he/him] • • •Anomalocaris
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •sudo_halt
in reply to Anomalocaris • • •ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •Ilixtze
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •gandalf_der_12te
in reply to Ilixtze • • •okgurl
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •goferking (he/him)
in reply to okgurl • • •SupaTuba
in reply to okgurl • • •like this
Oofnik likes this.
bus_factor
in reply to SupaTuba • • •SupaTuba
in reply to bus_factor • • •Lileath
in reply to SupaTuba • • •HERRAX
in reply to Lileath • • •Doesn't the majority of Americans agree with Trump's immigration policy as well? Guess if the approval rating is > 50% we should just allow anyone to bomb the everliving shit out of any civilian no matter of their political view?
I'm in no fucking way in support for Israel, fuck them and the people supporting their actions, but I am also 100% against killing civilians anywhere. Not in Israel, not in Russia, not in Iran, not in Gaza.
The normalization of accepting civilian casualties because they belong to the "enemy" state is a fucking disgusting mindset we all need to get rid off as soon as possible.
It'sbetterwithbutter
in reply to HERRAX • • •The majority of the world is critical of ALL Americans now for Trump, he was elected twice, thant's on them all. Israelis have expressed majority support for this ongoing genocide and attacks on Iran, this is on them all.
Bomb a soverign nation "pre emptively" get bombed back.
Fuck the entire Israeli government and anyone who supports it.
HERRAX
in reply to It'sbetterwithbutter • • •By that logic you could say that because there is an overwhelming support for outlawing LGBTQ rights in Iran and Gaza, Israel is fine with commiting their genocide because fuck anyone who wants to imprison or kill LGBTQ people, am I right?
Just stop fucking killing civilians, or cheer for the death of civilians, it's never morally correct. It's an act of terror, and any regime doing it should be classified as a terrorist regime.
Just to be clear, I am FINE, no, I even SUPPORT retaliatory strikes on Israel, but do it on military targets FFS. Bomb the everliving fuck out of Israel, but don't target civilians, there are plenty of tactical targets to choose from.
It'sbetterwithbutter
in reply to HERRAX • • •Fuck the zionist bastard Israelis and fuck the Iranian regime.
But Fuck the Israeli zionists more.
HERRAX
in reply to It'sbetterwithbutter • • •Ok, so what makes it OK to kill Israeli civilians but not Palestinian or Iranian? Where is the line drawn for when it's ok to kill civilians? Is the line exactly at supporting genocide? Is it OK as long as one side is worse than the other?
I have a co-worker who support Israel, should I just go ahead and stab them to death the next time I see them?
What's stopping you from going to the closest Israel apologist and shooting them in the face?
Please let me know what makes you accept civilian casualties of one kind but not the other.
I'll be back here with my insane and moronic reasoning of civilians being killed always being a bad thing.
It'sbetterwithbutter
in reply to HERRAX • • •When a country attacks a sovereign nation, they should expect retaliation. When the majority of that country backs genocide, I don't feel too much empathy.
HERRAX
in reply to It'sbetterwithbutter • • •I am far more outraged at the tens of thousands of dead civilians in Gaza, if I haven't made that clear by stating several times that Israel is committing fucking Genocide.
The comment I first wrote a reply to insinuated that because a majority of Israelis agree with the genocide, the Iranian strikes are valid despite targeting civilian locations. I am of the opinion that no side, ever, have validity in targeting civilians. I don't care what the majority thinks, if you don't partake in said genocide, I don't think you deserve to be targeted.
As I see it, you are arguing against me in targeting civilians being wrong. If that is not the case, its a misunderstanding. If it is the case, we are in disagreement.
Peace out ✌️
It'sbetterwithbutter
in reply to HERRAX • • •I am Lebanese and have lived through two Israeli wars on Lebanon, the 82 invasion and the 2006 July war. Israel targets journalists and medics and civilians constantly as I have witnessed first hand.
I don't condone attacks on civilians, but when Israel is involved I have zero empathy. I used to, but now zero. I couldn't care less if the entire Israeli popluation live in shelters for decades until they behave like a normal country. They cannot tout being a democracy anymore and the wests support for Israel is disgusting.
HERRAX
in reply to It'sbetterwithbutter • • •I have complete understanding of your feelings on the subject and will not hold your reasoning against you, and just want to end with saying our feelings against Israel seem to be very much alike, with the exception of the subject of civilian casualties.
I wish you a very nice weekend!
It'sbetterwithbutter
in reply to HERRAX • • •sudo_halt
in reply to SupaTuba • • •SupaTuba
in reply to sudo_halt • • •Bloomcole
in reply to bus_factor • • •As they always have proven their entire miserable history.
Singling out Netanyahoo is Bernie the sheepdog's tactics of dammage control
arrow74
in reply to Bloomcole • • •Blaming the government in power and those who put them in power for the actions taken by the government is totally reasonable.
You're suggesting well "what about a hypothetical government that doesn't exist huh?". That doesn't matter. They don't exist. Blame the government
IttihadChe
in reply to arrow74 • • •Israel didn't become an apartheid genocidal occupation of Palestinian land under Netanyahu. It's has been since its founding.
You're suggesting we close our eyes and pretend their entire history doesn't matter, that we just blame the current figurehead and his (variable but typically increasingly few) direct supporters.
Bloomcole
in reply to arrow74 • • •What doesn't exist is a reality where the next government isn't brutally mistreating Palestine.
Your hasbara is weak
arrow74
in reply to Bloomcole • • •First let's settle one thing, Israel has no right to exist. I'm against assuming 100% of the populace is all for the genocide. The majority government and their supporters clearly are.
The apartheid state of Israel needs to end. The genocide needs to be stopped by any means, except a genocide in return.
The entire majority government and their supporters can hang.
I'm not going to condem the rest for a "thought" crime they didn't commit. Maybe they would have done the same thing, maybe not.
Bloomcole
in reply to arrow74 • • •I hope you are being naive.
aljazeera.com/news/2015/11/9/p…
timesofisrael.com/poll-half-of…
Plenty of jews outside the apartheid state are against it.
Those that live there, wether bcs of propaganda or a superiority complex don't.
Maybe 5 to 10% maximum have normal views.
You know what they say about people trying the same thing and expecting different results.
Poll: 53% Israelis support extrajudicial killings
Al JazeeraIttihadChe
in reply to SupaTuba • • •AntiOutsideAktion
in reply to SupaTuba • • •lenz
in reply to AntiOutsideAktion • • •Idk man. If you’re a child, a unhoused, or a otherwise a person without the economic means to leave because your ancestors were settlers and you just so happened to be born in the colonized land, I’d consider you a civilian. I think your view is too black and white.
Screw you if you’re a deliberate Zionist benefiting from genocide though.
IttihadChe
in reply to lenz • • •Israelis aren't walled in and prevented from leaving like Palestinians are in Gaza.
Israelis have no practical excuse to continue their occupation, especially when everyone is forced to serve in the IDF to actively aid the occupation rather than just passively.
Allero
in reply to AntiOutsideAktion • • •As long as they are not on active duty, they shouldn't be targets. And if they are forced to serve, they should still only be killed if they are an active threat. Normally, they should first be offered to surrender.
Hope you're acting ironic and do not actually call to genocide all Jews in Israel.
Tiger666
in reply to Allero • • •No, but all Israelis that are zionists maybe.
Zionists are not Jewish people, they are actually against Judaism.
I believe it's the Talmud that says Israel cannot exist until the messiah returns. This is why you have many religious Jews in the US against the state of Israel.
Zionists are the one and only antisemites.
Allero
in reply to Tiger666 • • •Zionists are mostly Jews, but Jews are mostly not Zionists.
But yes, according to Talmud, Israel shouldn't exist.
Tiger666
in reply to Allero • • •IttihadChe
in reply to Allero • • •There are more Christian Zionists than there are Jews in total.
"Zionists are mostly Jews" is an objectively false statement.
Maybe specifically in Israel the statement could be seen as true, but that's only because Israel is a jewish settler ethnostate, so most of almost any grouping would be a majority Jews.
AntiOutsideAktion
in reply to Allero • • •Hope you're acting ironic by saying that you can commit a genocide, put your gun over the fireplace you murdered a family to steal, and suddenly not be a valid target.
It doesn't matter if you put your gun down as a settler colonizer. You're still actively engaging in the genocide. You are still a valid target.
And the objective of any just war is to expel you.
Get on a plane and go home. No one's stopping you. That's your opportunity.
Allero
in reply to AntiOutsideAktion • • •How are you engaging in genocide if you do not take part in the war? And especially if you denounce the actions of your government? Is being born in Israel enough to be seen as a genocidal maniac?
I swear this "settler" discourse is gonna drive me crazy at some point.
AntiOutsideAktion
in reply to Allero • • •How can you call me a robber just because I accepted all of these stolen goods that were stolen specifically for me to have?
Shut the fuck up holy god
Good. Go crazy. Shut the fuck up.
If you join the IDF yes it fucking is. And why are you acting like this is something that happened at the dawn of history? These are not people who were born there. These are people who settled there because they were told they could murder people and steal their homes. Stop making ahistoric excuses for fucking fascists, you fucking fascist piece of shit.
Allero
in reply to AntiOutsideAktion • • •In no way to be a snob, but could we tone it down? After all, we're mostly on the same page on that the state of Israel is committing war crimes, we only differ in who we blame for it.
Back to the substance:
First, Israel as an independent state exists since 1948, so yes, the absolute majority of people living in modern day Israel were born there; they are not the same people who came to displace Palestinians all those decades ago.
Second, I did not talk about IDF soldiers. Those who voluntarily joined Israeli armed forces do take part in an act of evil, and deserve to be judged. I do not support the same notion in respect to Israeli civilians and those on mandatory service.
Third, in your robber hypothetical, where are the Israeli civilians? Do they have to renounce their citizenship and go live abroad not to receive "stolen goods"? Someone who is opposed to the war taking place are not "robbers" here.
AntiOutsideAktion
in reply to Allero • • •Mind palace nonsense. Fuck you just saying shit so confidently. 50% of the jewish population emigrated since 2000.
Literally learn the first fucking thing about the subject you're talking about before you open your dumb fucking mouth about it. Not even going to help you here. Shut up. Sit down. Listen. Read. But most importantly shut the fuck up.
Fucking nazi genocide denial
Again just speaking out of pure fucking mind palace ignorance. The jewish population of Isn'treal almost unanimously supports the extermination of the palestinians. You are arguing pure rhetoric outside of reality. That's why it's so important that you shut the fuck up
Allero
in reply to AntiOutsideAktion • • •Most of your points can be readily disproved with a single search query, however, it's not worth engaging with a person who can't hold their temper for a second.
Therapy does magic.
AntiOutsideAktion
in reply to Allero • • •You know what you call someone who remains placid and unphased in the face of a genocide?
A Nazi.
A Nazi that believes The Secret works on reality retroactively
Wonder how you easily disprove the genocide denial you committed in this thread...?
Anarcho-Bolshevik
in reply to AntiOutsideAktion • • •(Source.)
Drunk on Genocide
Google BooksEatspancakes84
in reply to AntiOutsideAktion • • •Bloomcole
in reply to SupaTuba • • •queermunist she/her
in reply to Bloomcole • • •Bloomcole
in reply to queermunist she/her • • •The most navel staring country on the planet
queermunist she/her
in reply to Bloomcole • • •The reason the US supports Israel is exactly because Israel is a settler-colony. They're part of the same genocidal settler project, Zionism is Manifest Destiny.
If landback wins in Israel the ones paying attention know that it's coming for them too.
Bloomcole
in reply to queermunist she/her • • •queermunist she/her
in reply to Bloomcole • • •But they didn't have to make a colony of European settlers to do that, did they? Egypt is a loyal collaborator with the US and it fulfills the same geostrategic goals, but the amount of support Egypt gets pales in comparison to Israel. Why is that?
We can't dismiss the ideological importance of Israel. The unlimited support of the 51st state is exactly because it is a settler-colony.
Bloomcole
in reply to queermunist she/her • • •Egypt hasn't always been loyal, certainly not the population.
They overthrew the previous puppet despite US efforts to keep him in place.
When they saw it was hopeless they threw him under the bus and 'supported' the arab spring movement.
In reality they hijacked the revolution and simply put another puppet in place.
queermunist she/her
in reply to Bloomcole • • •Settler-colonialism isn't just about who is in power (although it is about that). That's just regular colonialism, like French Algeria.
Settler-colonialism is about importing settlers to replace the indigenous population while enacting genocidal policies to exterminate or expell the indigenous population. Egypt isn't experiencing that.
That's why Egypt doesn't get the level of support that Israel does.
Bloomcole
in reply to queermunist she/her • • •I disagree.
kreskin
in reply to Bloomcole • • •This belief that Israel is a US controlled proxy has always vexed me.
So-- honest question here-- From inside the US it appears that our entire political apparatus is controlled by a relatively small sprinkling of zionists doing whatever is good for Israel and is inevitably bad for the US-- going all the way back to the Nakba. But theres always people (like yourself) on Lemmy and Reddit claiming Israel is a US creature under US control for US gain.
As an American my free speech ends and I get prosecuted if I say anything anti semitic. I CAN say racist things about anyone else, all I want as long as I dont start a riot.
Can you tell me why you are so certain zionism is controlled by the US (your understanding), not the US by rich zionists (my understanding)?
edit: Did you just ..downvote and run away from the question? It was an honest question.
Bloomcole
in reply to kreskin • • •The US and Israel have a partnership.
While the zionist representation is very visible in US politics and creates the belief that they contol it it is not so.
Can you honestly believe that if you objectively compare the two?
A tiny country with a small population and a small army (despite again being disproportionally and relatively big) vs a huge country with the largest military in the world that was already a world power before the other even existed.
" doing whatever is good for Israel and is inevitably bad for the US"
Can you give an example?
If you're thinking now that the bad thing is israel may drag the US into war with Iran you're mistaken.
That may happen but it's bcs it is the US intention to have war on Iran.
They have provoked them many times all on their own without using the israel proxy.
Hijacking ships, small attacks and unilaterally breaking the nuclear deal, etc. to increase tension.
Anyway here's a good article I recently read.
Whatever is happening now has long been predicted.
"Did you just …downvote and run away from the question? It was an honest question."
I sometimes sleep, and never run away from a discussion if it's civil or useful.
Which is rare here since .world is infested with reactionary clowns throwing insults and platitutes when they lose an argument.
Let me know what you think.
Why does the U.S. support Israel? A geopolitical analysis with economist Michael Hudson | MR Online
Editor (MR Online)kreskin
in reply to Bloomcole • • •examples of whats good for Israel being bad for the US:
Our aligning with Israel during the Yom Kipur war (6 day war) caused Oil prices to quadruple, which caused a decade of turmoil in the US, and almost incalculable damage to our currency. And it never really recovered to a natural pattern. The US runs on oil.
macrotrends.net/1369/crude-oil…
See that massive bump up in 1973? I dont suppose you are old enough to remember interest rates in the 80s are you? it peaked at 21.5%. Thats catastrophic damage to the average US persons purchasing power. Wages didnt keep up with costs-- not even close. The Israeli's colonial war cost the US our middle class and created a massive underclass. We all paid for their war, that they claim was preemptive and unavoidable, and not their fault (just like their attack on Iran today).
And what was our reward for that? Did we gain any political leverage at all in that region? Bases? soft power? No. No we didnt. all we got was some of the blame for the Nakba, and some of the blame for the ridiculous levels persecution and murder of the Palestinian people. It was pure cost.
1990-1991 Desert storm
Israel badly wanted Sadam Hussein removed. Iraq said they invaded Kuwait because Kuwait was slant drilling into their oil fields, which is true and was known at the time to be true. So we invaded and rescued a bunch of literal thieves-- and coincidentally destroyed a potent adversary of Israel. What did we gain? anything? Two air bases, and thats about it, at great cost. The government or Iraq is barely more friendly to us that they were before. I suppose we got CENTCOM established in Kuwait. So thas not nothing, but its darn close to nothing. Israel got a major enemy removed for them. They didnt join in desert storm-- and did not allow overflight of their territory during it. They are not, and never have been a real military ally. They court Russia as much as they do the US. Same as India.
9/11/2001. Bin Laden says he attacked the world trade centers in new york to bring US public eyes to the plight of the Palestinian people that their government was facilitating, but that Americans had no idea about. And what did our people do? Our government idiotically claimed "they hated us for our freedoms", and made a big show about not blaming all muslims, just some. What was America's gain there? And when the attack happened, Israelis in New York and Israel were caught on tape literally cheering about it and filming it.
Bin Ladens interview with PBS:
pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/s…
"The American imposes himself on everyone. Americans accuse our children in Palestine of being terrorists--those children, who have no weapons and have not even reached maturity. At the same time, Americans defend a country, the state of the Jews, that has a policy to destroy the future of these children."
Obviously no one condones or support what Bin Laden did, but lets be clear eyed in our foreign policy: was he incorrect in any way in his statement? I dont see how we can honestly say he was not being earnest -- to his point of view anyway. 9/11 and its outcomes would seem to be a massive, massive, massive cost to the United states in terms of hard power and soft, and added tremendously to our national debt burden. We have the TSA exactly because of Israel's murderous colonial adventurism. What of we'd simply show the muslim world the diplomatic respect of equals from the start? And he was right, zionism IS a policy of displacing the locals from their land however possible. Thats all it is. Its racist theft and murder. Its not self defense or justice, and it never has been.
And that brings us to today. We're literally sponsoring a genocide of innocents, for Israel's benefit. Its one of the most illegal and immoral things a country can possibly do.
The world HATES the US because of our stand with Israel. They now see us as almost as bad as Israel. Stupid. Easily manipulated. A global problem. This is as we have also been the main contributor to food aid and the stability of trade across the planet. Thats a cost. And what have we gotten out of it? Our funding of free weapons for shenangans and murder, and our vetoing every resolution that is about peace and justice in the region for Israeli gain costs us dearly. It makes every American traveler unsafe and unwelcome, and makes people not want to trade with us or listen to our opinions. It is destroying the concepts of democracy and the rules based order, and the concept os the western world itself. The world is ditching the dollar. I hope its all worth it for Israel to finish their genocide of innocents, who today have nothing. They are doing it for beachfront condos. They will not be any more secure after this.
And what does the US population gain for our support? Its not for any philosophical or moral reason, obviously. Israelis literally spit on christians they see in the street-- is that what friends and long term allies do? Does it indicate a "partnership"? What exactly does Israel provide to the US beyond campaign bribes through AIPAC? Intel on their enemies?
Who Is Bin Laden? - Greetings, America. My Name Is Osama Bin Laden - Hunting for bin Laden
FRONTLINEBloomcole
in reply to kreskin • • •The US has done plenty of scumbaggery including some you put in pisrahells shoes.
That's why they hate you and it's well deserved.
You caused infinitely more deaths and miserythan the little coloniser entity.
kreskin
in reply to Bloomcole • • •Bloomcole
in reply to kreskin • • •kreskin
in reply to Bloomcole • • •Bloomcole
in reply to kreskin • • •Can't explain anything to someone who's american dumb and had crappy propagandised education and news on his banana republic.
Waste of time, like explaining quantum theorie to a dog.
Enjoy yor shithole, now fuck off
kreskin
in reply to Bloomcole • • •Uh huh. Except none of what I listed is as complex and theoretical as quantum theory.
You're just using that comparison as a dodge because you have no answer to what I laid out. 50 years of the US being continually shafted and getting nothing from our "partnership" with zionists has been a disaster for the US and it has to stop.
IttihadChe
in reply to queermunist she/her • • •kreskin
in reply to queermunist she/her • • •Manifest destiny said the US land is all ours. Also Hawaii.
Divine right mandated by God, so..
/s
kreskin
in reply to SupaTuba • • •Tiger666
in reply to kreskin • • •SupaTuba
in reply to Tiger666 • • •Kbobabob
in reply to SupaTuba • • •OrteilGenou
in reply to Kbobabob • • •SupaTuba
in reply to Kbobabob • • •Cethin
in reply to SupaTuba • • •martin4598
in reply to SupaTuba • • •Just a reminder: 82% of all the Israeli Jews support ethnic cleansing in Gaza.
Just saying.
Droggelbecher
in reply to martin4598 • • •SoyViking [he/him]
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •小莱卡
in reply to SoyViking [he/him] • • •like this
themadcodger likes this.
Grapho
in reply to 小莱卡 • • •m532
in reply to 小莱卡 • • •Anomalocaris
in reply to SoyViking [he/him] • • •Rom [he/him]
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •WhyIAughta
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •ceenote
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •Tomtits
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •like this
clove likes this.
小莱卡
in reply to Tomtits • • •HiddenLayer555
in reply to 小莱卡 • • •Don't forget European colonialism.
That's what really started this whole shitshow.
like this
Oofnik likes this.
Pennomi
in reply to Tomtits • • •chortle_tortle
in reply to Tomtits • • •LSNLDN
in reply to chortle_tortle • • •Dessalines
in reply to LSNLDN • • •LSNLDN
in reply to Dessalines • • •Crankenstein
in reply to chortle_tortle • • •OhVenus_Baby
in reply to Crankenstein • • •Barbarian
in reply to OhVenus_Baby • • •Here's the long version.
Short version is that in WW1, the UK conquered Palestine from the Ottoman empire. 1922-1948, the British ran the territory, getting shot at regularly by both native Arabs, the tiny number of native Jews, and the comparatively much larger group of immigrant Jews. In the 1940s, the UK asked for and got US help with counterterrorist operations, especially against Jewish ones. Arabs and Jews pinky promised to play nice with each other if the UK left, so rather than continue getting shot by everyone in the region, they left. Arabs and Jews immediately started a war as soon as the UK army left. Then, every single neighbouring country attacked the newly formed Israel, which they somehow survived.
(Missing HUGE amounts of context and nuance here, obviously)
League of Nations Mandate in the Middle East under British administration (1920–1948)
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)kreskin
in reply to Barbarian • • •Barbarian
in reply to kreskin • • •Crankenstein
in reply to OhVenus_Baby • • •Just look up the history of Israel before it was given statehood and of Zionism. Here is a good article by the Guardian. warning, it's a very complicated situation, all in all, and this article really gets into the nitty gritty of history. Literally, deep into it. It's some heavy reading.
Boiled down though...
After the defeat of the Ottomans and their empire partitioned off to various countries after the Sinai and Palestine campaigns of WW1, the British were given control via a mandate by the League of Nations over a territory that became known as the Mandate of Palestine, but it was still mostly Arab citizens, the British were just given authority to maintain order in the region.
During the years of occupation, the British government encouraged European Jews to settle the region in an effort to fulfill political obligations to the Zionist movement made at what is known as the Balfour Declaration. This caused a civil war to break out over the whole colonization thing.
With the end of the Mandate over the region drawing to an end, and the tensions of the area heightened after civil war, the U.N. voted to subdivide the Mandate of Palestine into two separate states: Palestine and Israel
The Mandate years: colonialism and the creation of Israel
Guardian staff reporter (The Guardian)rumimevlevi
in reply to Crankenstein • • •Here a good article about british complicity into heping the creation of the state of israel
declassifieduk.org/how-britain…
How Britain supported Zionism and prevented Palestinian freedom
A BUSTOS (Declassified Media ltd)dutchkimble
in reply to Crankenstein • • •it's not often that shit just works
in reply to OhVenus_Baby • • •- YouTube
m.youtube.comztwhixsemhwldvka
in reply to Crankenstein • • •rumimevlevi
in reply to ztwhixsemhwldvka • • •Crankenstein
in reply to ztwhixsemhwldvka • • •Yea, they say they restricted the Jewish immigrants. Yet, if you read the article posted in my other comment, you'd see that their actions during the time period of their mandate speaks a different tale.
Them abstaining from the vote is purely performative, and doesn't negate the rest of what they did to facilitate the colonization of Palestine.
Almacca
in reply to Tomtits • • •sudo_halt
in reply to Almacca • • •Back before Britain/US/Pissrael there was the Persian empire, and there were maybe a war with Russia or the Ottomans in good sport once in a while
This shit is a modern creation thank you very much
zr0
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •stray
in reply to zr0 • • •ZWQbpkzl [none/use name]
in reply to zr0 • • •IttihadChe
in reply to ZWQbpkzl [none/use name] • • •lazynooblet
in reply to IttihadChe • • •"quantative easing"
Literally printing money
ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]
in reply to lazynooblet • • •IttihadChe
in reply to lazynooblet • • •I meant more politically and materially than just monetarily.
If we cut social programs at home and continue to send/ ramp up even more billions to support Israel it will just create even more unrest, which is already at a low boil.
We also don't have unlimited manufacturing capabilities. How much material can we sacrifice without weakening our own access to these resources.
davel
in reply to lazynooblet • • •ouRKaoS
in reply to IttihadChe • • •ZWQbpkzl [none/use name]
in reply to IttihadChe • • •StupidBrotherInLaw
in reply to zr0 • • •valkyrieangela
in reply to StupidBrotherInLaw • • •zr0
in reply to valkyrieangela • • •sudo_halt
in reply to zr0 • • •humanspiral
in reply to zr0 • • •slaneesh_is_right
in reply to zr0 • • •小莱卡
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •ComradeSharkfucker
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •IndustryStandard
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •merdaverse
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]
in reply to merdaverse • • •Kuori [she/her]
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •all violence against fascists is justified
all violence against genocidaires is morally good
Anomalocaris
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •Grapho
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •IttihadChe
in reply to Grapho • • •Grey
in reply to IttihadChe • • •mesitoispro
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •I'm cheering for the destruction of the Zionist regime just like I'd cheer for the destruction of the Nazi regime.
Good hit. Let's see more.
Allero
in reply to mesitoispro • • •Kbobabob
in reply to Allero • • •Allero
in reply to Kbobabob • • •Hope as many generals as possible got into the fire
ZWQbpkzl [none/use name]
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •IttihadChe
in reply to ZWQbpkzl [none/use name] • • •I've seen reports of Airbases, the Kirya, many anti-air systems, and some city infrastructure/housing.
As usual it's iffy as Israel silences reports on impacts. But it's undeniable, Israel was rocked.
communism
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •Hestia [she/her, fae/faer]
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •Come back to America where you belong.
I’ll kick your fucking teeth in for perpetuating genocide, but at least you’ll be alive
Cowbee [he/they]
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •Commiunism
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •Zenith
in reply to Commiunism • • •Commiunism
in reply to Zenith • • •rumimevlevi
in reply to Zenith • • •rumimevlevi
in reply to Zenith • • •sudo_halt
in reply to Commiunism • • •O great chudjack in the sky
Let the power of your nothing ever happens flow through me one last time
Bloomcole
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •Apocalypteroid
in reply to Bloomcole • • •BrainInABox
in reply to Apocalypteroid • • •like this
geneva_convenience likes this.
Apocalypteroid
in reply to BrainInABox • • •BrainInABox
in reply to Apocalypteroid • • •It's entirely reasonable, you just have a white supremacist double standard.
The vast majority of the British Empire couldn't vote and were considered lesser beings. The US had racial inequality inshrined into law and a habit of murdering minorities. The USSR I leave as an exercise to the reader.
I assume you mean Israel.
Lol, the WW2 allies absolutely treated women as second class citizens, and criminalised homosexuality. Its also ghoulish the way westerners go "these countries treat minorities badly, so it's ok to kill them (including the minorities). Ukraine isn't perfect about minorities either, do you use that to say they deserve to get invaded? Oh wait, Ukraine in white.
The British Empire was more evil than Iran by multiple orders of magnitude, yet for some reason (white supremacy) you don't take this stance on WW2
Bloomcole
in reply to BrainInABox • • •A white supremacist who used the slogan 'keep Britain white'.
Called Jews 'hebrew bloodsuckers' and has murdered millions
BrainInABox
in reply to Bloomcole • • •prole
in reply to Apocalypteroid • • •crazyhotpasta
in reply to prole • • •prole
in reply to crazyhotpasta • • •Cowbee [he/they]
in reply to prole • • •The USSR was a functioning democracy, moreso than its peer countries. Rather than being entirely decided by Capital, the Soviets extended democratic input to the economic sector. Soviet Democracy by Pat Sloan and This Soviet World by Anna Louise Strong are both good first-hand accounts.
It certainly wasn't perfect, either, but it was a dramatic improvement on Capitalism. Zhenli has a good article on contextualizing some of the failures of democracy in early Socialism, as well as pointing out how western leftists often let the perfect Socialism in their heads be the enemy of the flawed but really existing Socialism in the real world, that faces real struggles thanks to being a really existing system.
Why Do Marxists Fail to Bring the “Workers’ Paradise”?
真理zhenli (Medium)prole
in reply to Cowbee [he/they] • • •Cowbee [he/they]
in reply to prole • • •My point was about the USSR being democratic, which is historically true. They held elections, decided economic decisions collectively, and extended democracy not just from the realm of deciding which bourgeois politician or party represents you to the economic and political sectors governing policy and direction. A simple "they weren't dude" doesn't disprove historical fact.
Unless, of course, your parameters for deciding if something is democratic or not is decided by vibes, there's really no reason to call it undemocratic. As an overall measure of material functions of democracy, the USSR was more democratic than the major powers of the allies and axis during World War II. They certainly had flaws with their democracy, hence the inclusion on my part of Zhenli's essay, but these flaws weren't because they had the "wrong recipe," but because democracy is a material structure that needs to be built.
As for the "tankie" jab, I'm not going to apologize for being a Marxist. I agree that they were the most important force in World War II, but I disagree with your characterization of their democracy, hence why I offered sources for you or onlookers to read into to learn more. The opening of the Soviet Archives has only affirmed these primary sources as accurate, and the Zhenli essay helps us reframe how we think about building democratic structures in general.
Bloomcole
in reply to Apocalypteroid • • •Iran ranks 3rd in the world in numbers of engineers. 70% of them are women.
'The second class citizens' is exagerated, and often simply lies for propaganda purposes, like the Mahsa Amini case.
The last execution of homosexuals was 20 years ago, and this was for rape, not bcs homosexuality.
Yes many islamic countries have issues, and these are the typical hasbara machine's ammo:
"Let us genocide the Palestinians bcs they hate the gays!"
Also your WW2 'democracies' were - and still are in many cases - colonisers and looters of a large part of the world.
like this
geneva_convenience likes this.
stray
in reply to Bloomcole • • •Bloomcole
in reply to stray • • •Maybe go on Lemmygrad and ask them directly.
A few hours ago there were some discussing the attacks.
sudo_halt
in reply to Apocalypteroid • • •Eat dick
Thanks
tane2
in reply to sudo_halt • • •Drink bleach
Thanks
Bloomcole
in reply to Apocalypteroid • • •And the other side is caricaturally evil
like this
geneva_convenience likes this.
geneva_convenience
in reply to Apocalypteroid • • •Watch out, the enlightened centrist has arrived!
Winston Churchill, Adolf Hitler, well, they are both bad people. Let's root for neither of them.
porous_grey_matter
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •IttihadChe
in reply to porous_grey_matter • • •AES_Enjoyer
in reply to IttihadChe • • •IttihadChe
in reply to AES_Enjoyer • • •I'm not denying Churchills crimes or painting him as good.
How many would Hitler have murdered if he had similar control over the region? Just look at General plan Ost...
There's a reason the USSR tried to ally with Churchill against Hitler before hostilities even started.
AES_Enjoyer
in reply to IttihadChe • • •geneva_convenience
in reply to porous_grey_matter • • •Still I would have rooted for Churchill when it comes to the conflict of Nazi Germany versus Britain because I am able to separate actions from blindly supporting everything.
Iran too did absolutely horrible things in the past They sent a lot of children to die during their war with Iraq. The Mahsa Amani stuff everyone keeps bringing up is so lightweight but Western propagaganda is the dumbest stuff.
However, currently Iran is aiding Palestine and fighting Israel and they are not sending children to die for it. So I support that action.
Mouette
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •StupidBrotherInLaw
in reply to Bloomcole • • •kreskin
in reply to StupidBrotherInLaw • • •tane2
in reply to StupidBrotherInLaw • • •Tenderizer78
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •Cowbee [he/they]
in reply to Tenderizer78 • • •Tenderizer78
in reply to Cowbee [he/they] • • •Yeah, when I said that I didn't really adequately consider what would actually come of Iran being crippled. Civilian rule is not the likely outcome of Iran being defeated.
And Iran isn't as bad as Israel, I agree, but that's a pretty low bar.
Cowbee [he/they]
in reply to Tenderizer78 • • •A low bar it may be, but as you said in the beginning, a toppled Iran would end up like a toppled Iraq - utterly devastated and all of the flaws that existed pre-Iraq War seem like beauty marks after the genocidal US invasion.
People need to chart their own destiny, free from terrorization backed by the US Empire. Without that pressure, social movements in Iran have more room to breathe without fearing rocket-fire from Israel.
MrSpArkle
in reply to Cowbee [he/they] • • •Cowbee [he/they]
in reply to MrSpArkle • • •MrSpArkle
in reply to Cowbee [he/they] • • •It would look like no more Iranians being executed for not wearing a hijab, or being gay, or saying mean things about the ayatollah.
But I guess their regime is absolutely necessary to stop the very long list of people that want to genocide Persian culture.
Typical .ml authoritarian apologist.
Cowbee [he/they]
in reply to MrSpArkle • • •Iran is a flawed state, certainly, but if Israel succeeds then they will succeed in killing far more women and queer people than the Iranian state could ever hope to execute, along with cisgender folk, liberals, etc. This is pinkwashing. As a queer person myself, this type of rhetoric is just Imperialist apologia, the path to queer liberation of Iranians would be dramatically pushed backwards if Israel succeeds in destroying Iran.
Further, yes, Iran is necessary to stop the genocide in Palestine at this moment. When Western countries are all condemning Iran and backing Israel, it is the Global South that backs Iran. Gazans are cheering, Yemeni people are watching the bombings of Tel Aviv on the big screen. Israel has been the single greatest obstacle in queer liberation in the Middle East as the fomenter of chaos, genocide, and destabilization.
Why is it that queer liberation happens in some countries, and not others? When does it happen? Social progress is a product of economic development and liberation of the Working Class. Bombing Iran and creating a failed state would result in thousands of deaths of queer Iranians, children, and many more.
Do some self-crit. You're caping for Israel and advocating for the country doing the most to oppose genocide to collapse.
rumimevlevi
in reply to MrSpArkle • • •We saw how it ended up in iraq. How many time you guy get fooled by the west propaganda?
Iranians are smart enough to know the threat number one is israel then the rrgime
Dammam No. 7
in reply to MrSpArkle • • •- YouTube
www.youtube.comKulunkelBoom
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •like this
geneva_convenience likes this.
Lord Wiggle
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •like this
geneva_convenience likes this.
Avicenna
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •Bloomcole
Unknown parent • • •Still it doesn't compare and there's no excuse.
In this case the colonising is still going on, hence the genocide.
They are not 'citizens' but colonisers.
They deserve all they get, what they don't deserve is sympathy.
nutsack
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •Arcane2077
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •Mycatiskai
in reply to Arcane2077 • • •ameancow
in reply to Arcane2077 • • •I'll deliver this reply in Choose Your Own Adventure Format:
If you want to make a reference to Donald Trump being at his birthday parade and thus exposed, vulnerable and in the open and presently not looking up, turn to page 89.
If you rather make a reference to how we should leave the Devil be because the Devil himself is more respectable and honorable than any of these monstrous despots who murder out of spite and wrap themselves in scripture, turn to page 322.
Frenchfryenjoyer (she/her)
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •Cethin
in reply to Bloomcole • • •I would disagree. If you go back far enough, every land has been stolen. There is probably no piece of land that hasn't been held by multiple different groups over time.
I'd also argue a government existing at all is stolen land. What gives them the right to the land, instead of the people using it as they want? At some point someone decided the land was theirs, and not someone else's, and decided they could sell, lend, or use the land as they want, even if someone else also wanted to use it.
Bloomcole
in reply to Cethin • • •queermunist she/her
in reply to Cethin • • •Before colonialism, empires would conquer lands and then just make the people who already live there into their subjects.
And before empires and agriculture and such, people weren't really organized enough to steal land (and weren't embedded deeply enough in the land for it to be stolen). They'd just move to the new land and become part of the people already there.
Cethin
in reply to Bloomcole • • •Cethin
in reply to queermunist she/her • • •Yeah, that's my point. At one point in time land wasn't something owned, just something utilized. The fact that governments exert control over them implies they were stolen, as it prevents some people from utilizing it. See: Proudhon - What is Property?
queermunist she/her
in reply to Cethin • • •Okay, you need to recognize that there are greater and lesser contradictions. Yes, all property is theft, but is that a useful line for Palestinians to struggle against? Can they even meaningfully abolish property without solving the colonial question?
That's why we say the colonial question is the primary contradiction. Israelis are colonial invaders that have come to steal the land and expel or kill the indigenous population. This is a greater concern than, say, Palestinian business owners owning property (and thus stealing the land from the Commons). If we don't focus our struggles and identify the primary contradiction, we just lash out at every injustice all at once and accomplish nothing because we are overwhelmed.
Every successful decolonial struggle for national independence involves cooperation between the landless and the landed, because colonialism takes primacy. We can deal with the question of "who gets to own the land" once the invaders are gone.
Bloomcole
in reply to Cethin • • •They are not ‘citizens’ but colonisers.
It's not an unfortunate fait accompli like the US that eradicated the original inhabitants for instance.
Cethin
in reply to queermunist she/her • • •I never said that, though "the colonial question" is solved if you abolish property, so it's still worth considering, even in this context.
Yes, and the whole system is built on ownership of property. Addressing the surface level issue (colonizer stealing land) is great, but you should also consider the root cause. If they can't own land then there's no colonization. It's worth looking at both of these and fighting both. If there is to be a system enacted (which currently is no where close to happening, but still needs to be a consideration), it should be one that protects people and prevents exploitation, so this doesn't happen again.
It's too late to do it then. That's how you have a revolution collapse into something horrible; it didn't have a plan for what comes after. The people struggling to just survive don't need to consider this, but it does need to be considered. If you wait until after it's done then you just end up with squabbling, and the group who can exert control takes it without consent.
Highlybaked
in reply to geneva_convenience • • •like this
geneva_convenience likes this.
Babalugats
in reply to Highlybaked • • •Or have I just made that up?
I never double checked. It was something I've just thought existed. Obviously not..
BrainInABox
in reply to Babalugats • • •LoudWaterHombre
in reply to Babalugats • • •queermunist she/her
in reply to Cethin • • •It's an order of operations. If they try to resolve every contradiction all at the same time they stretch the revolution too thin and drive all of their enemies into one unified front.
That doesn't mean they shouldn't even think about the other contradictions (in fact, progressive forces should internally theorize and strategize in secret about what to do after the colonial occupation is defeated) but it does mean that those secondary contradictions are to be set aside in public while they focus on the primary contradiction.
Now isn't the time to air the dirty laundry of everyone that's on your side against the occupation.
Obviously propertied interests are going to be a problem after the occupation is defeated, but until the occupation is defeated they can used. Not only does this increase the power and size of the decolonial struggle by creating a unified front, but without that ability to set aside secondary contradictions those propertied interests will join the occupation's side instead. Those propertied interests are only using the revolutionaries for their own ends, but progressive forces are only using them in turn.
This is how every successful decolonial struggle was won.
Many decolonial struggles only achieved flag independence and failed to achieve sovereignty because they either failed to identify those secondary contradictions or chose to forget the secondary contradictions in their nationalistic fervor, but that's not what I'm advocating! Once the occupation is defeated one of those secondary contradictions will become the new primary contradiction, and progressive forces will need to be prepared for that.
But that has to wait. In the immediate struggle, everyone has a common enemy.
Cethin
in reply to queermunist she/her • • •