3 out of 10 password managers aren't secure enough(Google Chrome, mSecure, and PassSecurium).
3 out of 10 password managers aren't secure enough, including Chrome's - Techzine Global
German BSI examined 10 password managers: 3 not secure enough. Chrome, mSecure, and PassSecurium theoretically allow access.Erik van Klinken (Techzine)
3 out of 10 password managers aren't secure enough(Google Chrome, mSecure, and PassSecurium).
3 out of 10 password managers aren't secure enough, including Chrome's - Techzine Global
German BSI examined 10 password managers: 3 not secure enough. Chrome, mSecure, and PassSecurium theoretically allow access.Erik van Klinken (Techzine)
linux based video recording
Old cameras but they have been sitting.
What can I use to record and ensure the data is saved locally. Nothing serious, just chickens being accused of hurting plants when they are monitored. I just want to catch whatever it is (deer? Etc?) eating it so I can have evidence it isn't them
Tailscale is having performance issue with Admin and API
reshared this
Technology reshared this.
This $69 eReader is designed to stick to the back of your phone - Liliputing
I find this mini reader very interesting, maybe a bit too barebone.
- 114 x 69 x 5.9mm (4.5″ x 2.7″ x 0.2″)
- 220 pixels per inch
- no front lighting
- 650 mAh battery
- ESP32 microprocessor: Wifi, bluetooth, usb-C port
This $69 eReader is designed to stick to the back of your phone - Liliputing
This $69 eReader is designed to stick to the back of your phoneBrad Linder (Liliputing)
Feddit Un'istanza italiana Lemmy reshared this.
Russia to Bring Special Military Operation to Its Logical Conclusion – Putin
Russia to Bring Special Military Operation to Its Logical Conclusion – Putin
Russia will bring the special military operation to its logical conclusion, achieving its goals, Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Tuesday.Sputnik International
like this
Maeve e copymyjalopy like this.
don't like this
copymyjalopy doesn't like this.
like this
Maeve likes this.
Well, Lukashenko also said it, and the editor of RT said. But yes.
The other evidence they use is the feint that was sent directly at Kiev. They think the feint was a real genuine attempt to capture the capital city, and then from there take all the evidence that it was a feint and spin it into bad planning. So specifically, if you send a feint, and you're committed to that entire allocation of soldiers being wiped out, you don't send them in with supplies to last for a long slog - you send them in ultra light on a suicide mission. And that's essentially what the deployment to Kiev was, a group with an ultralight kit heading straight for Kiev to draw out forces and create confusion in the early days of the war. That feint was destroyed and then when they realized it was feint they spun it hard into "look at these fools who thought they could end this thing in three days" basically as a way of avoiding the obvious conclusion that they wasted time dealing with a trick.
It would be like if someone sent a feint filled with woodland creatures and animated scarecrows and after you waste strategically valuable time dealing with them you spend the rest of the war saying "this opponent is so dumb they thought they could win with scarecrows" when the reality is that you got tricked and the feint did exactly what it was intended to do.
By leaving Ukraine right? Thats the only logical conclusion I can think of.
Edit: holy hot heck did my block list just grow today.
don't like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ doesn't like this.
don't like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ doesn't like this.
"Hehehe CUM hehe people who don't support the Ukranian nazi government are GAY for a RUSSIAN man and GAY is BAD and SHAMEFUL huehuehue"
Behold: the liberal ally
like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ likes this.
The word “gradually” is doing some heavy lifting in your post. the economist estimates that russia has only captured an additional 1.45% of ukraine in 3 fucking years. the surge you mentioned has been a month long. it will sputter, just like every other putin blunder. russia has a lot of meat to throw at the enemy and the russian plebs seem remarkably complacent about putin’s misrule, but they can’t sustain this level of pressure.
here’s a chart to put your claim in perspective:
as for russia’s economy being strong - their interest rate is 16.5 percent. inflation is rampant. the us just made it harder for russia to sell oil with new sanctions on lukoil and rosnef. what school of economics do you beong to that calls this situation “holding on strong”?
the evidence that russia influenced the election is pervasive. so many maga influencers have been revealed as foreign accounts. i wouldn’t be too surprised to learn that you yourself are a russian bot, so uncritically do you spout moscow propaganda.
don't like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ doesn't like this.
There's no evidence that the collapse in Ukrainian defenses will slow down, rather it seems like it will accelerate as strongholds fall and the war becomes increasingly unpopular. Russia isn't trying to take all of Ukraine, just the four oblasts, the Economist is trying to frame it as total and complete conquest of Ukraine. When compared to Russia's actual objectives, Russia is advancing steadily.
Further, Russia does not "throw meat" at the war. Russians are largely supportive of Putin right now because he's doing a balancing act between appeasing the Russian capitalist class and the rising socialist movements in the public. Russia's economy is holding strong, the sheer fact that sanctions are still coming out means they haven't been effective thus far. I belong to the Marxist school of economics, which recognizes actual production over the largely financial western economies.
Your final accusation that I'm a bot for not agreeing with you is just the cherry on top. You give clear examples of liberals manipulating data like the economist graph and using percentages of total Ukrainian territory and not the Donbass region, because when we measure Russia by its ability to achieve its actual goals its clear that its rapidly advancing towards them. You're quite literally uncritically spouting liberal, western propaganda that falls apart at the slightest prodding.
like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ likes this.
wouldn’t be too surprised to learn that you yourself are a russian bot, so uncritically do you spout moscow propaganda.
Yeah, no shit the "evidence is pervasive" when your standard of evidence for declaring someone a Russian agent is "they disagree with me"
You are a fascist, you are a Nazi ranting about Judeo-Bolshevick conspiracies, you are a McCarthyist ranting about communist subversion of our precious bodily fluids.
the evidence that russia influenced the election is pervasive.
I could name a hundred things that are both pervasive and false. Previously:
- IT Pro: Cambridge Analytica models were exaggerated and ineffective, [UK Information Commissioner’s Office] claims
- Wall Street Journal: Mueller Doesn’t Find Trump Campaign Conspired With Russia
- Jacobin: Democrats and Mainstream Media Were the Real Kremlin Assets
- Washington Post: FEC fines DNC, Clinton for violating rules in funding Steele dossier
- Washington Post: Russian trolls on Twitter had little influence on 2016 voters
- Jacobin: It Turns Out Hillary Clinton, Not Russian Bots, Lost the 2016 Election
- Matt Taibbi: Move Over, Jayson Blair: Meet Hamilton 68, the New King of Media Fraud The Twitter Files reveal that one of the most common news sources of the Trump era was a scam, making ordinary American political conversations look like Russian spywork
- Jacobin: Why the Twitter Files Are in Fact a Big Deal On the Left, there’s been a temptation to dismiss the revelations about Twitter’s internal censorship system that have emerged from the so-called Twitter Files project. But that would be a mistake: the news is important and the details are alarming.
- Matt Taibbi: CIA "Cooked The Intelligence" To Hide That Russia Favored Clinton, Not Trump In 2016
- Aaron Maté: Under Trump, the CIA is still covering up its Russiagate fraud
- Matt Taibbi: Note on New Trump-Russia Disclosures Thanks to explosive new document releases, the Russiagate hoax is now exposed, commencing a new era that will be about accountability for the guilty
- Matt Taibbi: No Doubt Left: Russiagate Was a Cover-Up
- Chris Hedges: Why Russiagate Won’t Go Away The cynical con the Democratic Party and the F.B.I. carried out to falsely portray Donald Trump as a puppet of the Kremlin worked, and continues to work, because it is what those who detest Trump want to believe.
i wouldn’t be too surprised to learn that you yourself are a russian bot
These kinds of accusations get removed.
like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ likes this.
like this
Maeve e ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ like this.
like this
Maeve likes this.
like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ likes this.
Yes we would, and your dumbass would be screaming about it at the top of your lungs because reddit told you.
Look at how you're approaching the Ukraine war. You've shown that you know nothing about what was occuring pre-Feb 2022 and are adamant that everyone else that's trying to tell you about it in good faith is a Russian asset. To you, history started on Feb 2022; and anyone that tries to tell you otherwise for the sake of "nuance" and "context" and other frilly fuckass bullshit is a Russian asset personally getting paid by Putin himself.
Not only do you know absolutely nothing, but you have zero intention to critically engage others because of your arrogance. You won't learn a single thing and you are adamant about not learning a single thing. That kind of behavior will absolutely not disappear in a hypothetical situation where China directly intervenes to end the genocide.
Not only do you know absolutely nothing
Knowing nothing would an improvement, but instead she knows things that just ain’t so.
like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ likes this.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Is%E2%80…
Russia is doing what it’s doing, regardless of what you, BiaB, or anyone else thinks it ought to be doing.
like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ likes this.
Because Russia has no reason to be invading neighbouring countries?
Idk just a thought. Not sure why we reward the aggressors. Remember that time the Russian backed separatists who totally weren’t just Russian military shot down that airliner?
don't like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ doesn't like this.
No reason
Oh, of course. This all just happened for no reason, contravening all laws of cause and effect. History began in February 2022.
Reward the aggressor
Who's rewarding anyone? They've won the war all by themselves. This is how war works, not some kindergarten where you can put countries in timeout. To think that acknowledging objective reality is somehow "rewarding" anyone is some real "punish the unbelievers" type shit.
Real life is not marvel comic book that the "good guys" wins over the "bad guys".
Russia is winning and the logical conclusion is definitely not giving up at the finishing line and turn back. Do you know what logical means?
It’s not a comic book, it’s international relations. You know what would help russias relations? Getting the fuck out of Ukraine.
The logical conclusion is Russia fucks off and leaves other countries alone.
like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ likes this.
You Believe The Mainstream Narrative? Of Course You Do, You're Twelve
Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative MatrixCaitlin Johnstone (Caitlin’s Newsletter)
Liberals seem to think that if enough people say (or think, idk), let's say, "100 octillion russians dead", that reality will change to bend to their will.
This only works in fiction written by liberals though.
Because Russia has no reason to be invading neighbouring countries?
- Reuters, 2014: Leaked audio reveals embarrassing U.S. exchange on Ukraine, EU
- Leaked recording between Nuland and Pyatt: | transcript
- Counterpunch, 2014: US Imperialism and the Ukraine Coup
- BBC, 2014: Ukraine underplays role of far right in conflict
- Human Rights Watch, 2014: Ukraine: Unguided Rockets Killing Civilians
- Consortium News, 2015: The Mess That Nuland Made Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland engineered Ukraine’s regime change without weighing the likely consequences.
- The Hill, 2017: The reality of neo-Nazis in Ukraine is far from Kremlin propaganda
- The Guardian, 2017: 'I want to bring up a warrior': Ukraine's far-right children's camp – video
- WaPo, 2018: The war in Ukraine is more devastating than you know
- Reuters, 2018: Ukraine’s neo-Nazi problem
- The Nation, 2019: Neo-Nazis and the Far Right Are On the March in Ukraine
- openDemocracy, 2019: Why Ukraine’s new language law will have long-term consequences
- Al Jazeera, 2022: Why did Ukraine suspend 11 ‘pro-Russia’ parties?
- Jacobin, 2022: A US-Backed, Far Right–Led Revolution in Ukraine Helped Bring Us to the Brink of War
- Consortium News, 2023: The West’s Sabotage of Peace in Ukraine Former Israeli Prime Minister Bennett’s recent comments about getting his mediation efforts squashed in the early days of the war adds more to the growing pile of evidence that Western powers are intent on regime change in Russia.
- Internationalist 360°, 2022–2024: History of Fascism in Ukraine: Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV
- NYT, 2024: U.N. Court to Rule on Whether Ukraine Committed Genocide
NATO expansion:
- George Washington Univ., 2017: NATO Expansion: What Gorbachev Heard Declassified documents show security assurances against NATO expansion to Soviet leaders from Baker, Bush, Genscher, Kohl, Gates, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Hurd, Major, and Woerner
- Orinoco Tribune, 2022: Former German Chancellor Merkel Admits that Minsk Peace Agreements Were Part of Scheme for Ukraine to Buy Time to Prepare for War With Russia
- Al Mayadeen, 2023: Zelensky admits he never intended to implement Minsk agreements
- Jeffrey Sachs, 2023: The War in Ukraine Was Provoked—and Why That Matters to Achieve Peace
- Jeffrey Sachs, 2023: NATO Chief Admits NATO Expansion Was Key to Russian Invasion of UkraineNATO in general:
- The Intercept, 2021: Meet NATO, the Dangerous “Defensive” Alliance Trying to Run the World
- CounterPunch, 2022: NATO is Not a Defensive Alliance
- Noam Chomsky, 2023:
- Thomas Fazi, 2024: NATO: 75 years of war, unprovoked aggressions and state-sponsored terrorism
- Gabriel Rockhill, 2020: The U.S. Did Not Defeat Fascism in WWII, It Discretely Internationalized It
Especially with new leadership.Zelensky was a comedian groomed by oligarchs. He played a president on TV and then ran for president on TV. This was planned out in advance. Zelensky has never been in control because he was an actor in way over his head, beholden to US comprador oligarchs, and his life is openly threatened by high-level Banderite fascists should he get out of line. And he’s quite wealthy now, an oligarch in his own right. He’s in no way a “servant of the people;” that’s an act played by an actor.
ya nazi fucks
- Reuters, 2014: Leaked audio reveals embarrassing U.S. exchange on Ukraine, EU
- Leaked recording between Nuland and Pyatt: | transcript
- Counterpunch, 2014: US Imperialism and the Ukraine Coup
- BBC, 2014: Ukraine underplays role of far right in conflict
- Human Rights Watch, 2014: Ukraine: Unguided Rockets Killing Civilians
- Consortium News, 2015: The Mess That Nuland Made Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland engineered Ukraine’s regime change without weighing the likely consequences.
- The Hill, 2017: The reality of neo-Nazis in Ukraine is far from Kremlin propaganda
- The Guardian, 2017: 'I want to bring up a warrior': Ukraine's far-right children's camp – video
- WaPo, 2018: The war in Ukraine is more devastating than you know
- Reuters, 2018: Ukraine’s neo-Nazi problem
- The Nation, 2019: Neo-Nazis and the Far Right Are On the March in Ukraine
- openDemocracy, 2019: Why Ukraine’s new language law will have long-term consequences
- Al Jazeera, 2022: Why did Ukraine suspend 11 ‘pro-Russia’ parties?
- Jacobin, 2022: A US-Backed, Far Right–Led Revolution in Ukraine Helped Bring Us to the Brink of War
- Consortium News, 2023: The West’s Sabotage of Peace in Ukraine Former Israeli Prime Minister Bennett’s recent comments about getting his mediation efforts squashed in the early days of the war adds more to the growing pile of evidence that Western powers are intent on regime change in Russia.
- Internationalist 360°, 2022–2024: History of Fascism in Ukraine: Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV
- NYT, 2024: U.N. Court to Rule on Whether Ukraine Committed Genocide
Why did Ukraine suspend 11 ‘pro-Russia’ parties?
The suspensions have more to do with political polarisation than genuine security concerns related to the invasion.Volodymyr Ishchenko (Al Jazeera)
don't like this
copymyjalopy doesn't like this.
Edit: * /s *
Cowbee. I appreciate some of your takes on Marxism, but disagree frequently with your frame of reference on state power in the global field.
I view the war with Ukraine as one of Russo imperialism in response to Western imperialism. Indeed the USSR itself had many imperialist tendencies under a unified Asiatic / Slavic Soviet even as did Western and Asian counterparts post WW2
The irony being I am more allied to Trotsky or Luxemburg’s take. Which no doubt wouldn’t receive fair purchase in ML group. Forgive me for not directly referencing War and International - as it meanders but hits many themes relevant to Russia/Ukraine conflict
That being said to summarize my view: wars of conquest as a tool for furthering state capital / geopolitical interests shouldn’t be supported by Marxists, and posting the rationalization of an autocrat reads as support to me.
If Russia was actually imperialist and the Russo-Ukrainian war an inter-imperialist conflict, then I'd agree with you, but Russia isn't imperialist (and certainly not the USSR). In the current era, the US Empire is the hegemon, and its vassals the beneficiaries of imperialism. Russia is governed by nationalists who do not have a stake in the global imperialist system, and as such are forced into south-south trade and south-south alliances. Further, there is a rising communist movement within Russia that is growing year over year that stands to return Russia to socialism.
Ukraine is used somewhat similarly as how Israel is used by the US Empire; as millitary bases. The far-right Banderites in Kiev have power currently, and are doing their job of de-communization. The Donbass region seceded, and the ensuing war between Donetsk/Luhansk and Kiev is what is sparking Russian intervention. Russia is not doing this in pursuit of new neocolonies to exploit, nor does it have any. Russia lacks the financial capital as well as a spot in the global financial monopoly by which imperialism functions that the west has.
A NATO victory over Russia would result in ethnic cleansing in the Donbass region, serious destabilization in a significant anti-US force, and a strong ally for socialist countries and anyone trying to break away from the IMF.
Further, there is a rising communist movement within Russia that is growing year over year that stands to return Russia to socialism.
And, what? What difference does it make? France had a decent communist movement, right? They were still imperialists.
Russia doesn't have a stake in the world imperialist system, France does and has for centuries. If France were to lose in a war against the global south, there would be a huge blow to their continued domination and subjugation of African countries. The fact that Russia has a rising communist movement is just a bonus tacked onto the end, it isn't an indication of the country being imperialist or not. In fact, the nationalists in charge of Russia are caught between needing to appease the public yearning more and more for socialism and their own interests in perpetuating their capitalist system.
Does that make sense?
Cowbee, I disagree almost entirely with what you posted. But with respect for you clearly articulating your position I will share my response.
To your “But Russia is not imperialist” , please reflect on the following and to what extent you must stretch a rationalization:
First and Second Chechen Wars (1994, 2000)
Puppet Leader in Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko (1996)
Puppet leader in Ukraine Victor Yanukovych (2010)
Georgian War (2008)
Annexation of Crimea (2014)
Role in Syria conflict (2000 onwards)
Role in African dictatorships in Burma Faso and Niger (2010s- present)
… global south / US bad too / old Soviet vassal states must kneel ect… I get it. But the above conflicts are evidence of state capitalism exerting itself militarily for geopolitical and economic aims
I doubt this will influence you much as you are pretty invested in your world view. But from my vantage point and reading of theory (likely some overlap if you are ML) - you are wrong *respectfully
First and Second Chechen Wars
Purely defensive, internal conflicts on internationally recognized Russian territory against CIA backed jihadist terrorists who butchered civilians and committed heinous acts of terrorism such as taking an entire school hostage and murdering hundreds of children.
Puppet Leader in Belarus Alexander Lukashenko
Lukashenko has been the leader of Belarus longer than Putin has been president. Belarus is in a Union State with Russia, and still has more autonomy from Russia than the average EU state has from Brussels.
Puppet leader in Ukraine Victor Yanukovych
He was the furthest thing from a puppet. If anything he was Western-leaning, but trying to keep Ukraine neutral. His one unforgivable crime in the eyes of the West was rejecting a terrible EU trade deal that would have ruined Ukraine's economy (and did) in favor of an objectively much better one from Russia.
Georgian War
Literally even the EU investigation into that conflict admitted that Georgia started it. Emboldened by believing they had NATO backing, the US puppet president, installed in a color revolution, attacked the region of South Ossetia which was under the protection of Russian peacekeepers.
Annexation of Crimea
The people of Crimea overwhelmingly voted in a referendum to rejoin Russia in response to the fascist, Western-orchestrated Maidan coup.
The majority ethnic Russian population of Crimea did not want the same brutal neo-nazi terror militias that were terrorizing ethnic Russian regions across the rest of Ukraine to come to them, nor did they want to be forced to abide by the russophobic laws passed by the illegally installed Maidan regime, which Crimea, like the Donbass, did not recognize as legitimate.
Russia's actions in Crimea were a response to a crisis provoked by Western intervention and the overthrow of Ukraine's democratically elected government.
Role in Syria conflict
Russia co-operated with the legitimate Syrian government against a brutal Zionist/US armed and funded Al Qaeda/ISIS terrorist insurgency.
Role in African dictatorships in Burma Faso and Niger
Same thing. They are co-operating with the official government of those countries in counter-terrorist operations against Western backed jihadist terrorists.
None of this constitutes imperialism. In fact almost all of these are examples of Russia pushing back against Western imperialist aggression, encroachment and proxies.
marxists.org/archive/lenin/wor…
Imperialism is defined as the monopoly stage of finance capital.
Russian economy is dominated by the state and oligarchs, not by independent finance capital. It's territorial expansion while being an regional historical imperialist action is defensive and self limiting and driven mostly by nationalism and security concerns.
Your list provides critical empirical evidence for a dialectical analysis but requires contextualization to avoid oversimplification. See response from comrade @cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
Comrade cfgaussian already answered perfectly here. Essentially, you mix in defensive wars with allyships with other countries, and claim the defensive wars are for imperialism and the allyships "puppetry." The Sahel States are progressive, and are allied with Russia in their national liberation from France and western imperialism.
I am a Marxist-Leninist, yes. Imperialism needs to be analyzed primarily by the definition of imperialism Lenin gives, not on whether or not a country interacts with others. In most of these examples, such as the Sahel States, Russia is working against imperialism.
Imperialism is the monopoly stage of capitalism by which finance capital and world monopoly are dominant. Russia does not have this. Russia is currently under the control of nationalists, not finance capital, and it is the west that has that global financial monopoly.
Your error is in both erasing Lenin's analysis of imperialism and viewing any kind of interaction Russia has as inherently imperialist working backwards from there. To use your rhetoric, I suggest you reflect first on what imperialism is, why we define it as such and how it operates, and consider why Marxist-Leninists therefore have the understanding of the Russian Federation that we do.
China and Russia are not imperialist, they are closer to global south countries in their position with respect to imperialism as a global phenomenon. In order to fight the tendency for the rate of profit to fall, capital either seeks new markets, ie new inventions to flood with capital or geographically new markets, or it seeks to establish monopoly. The former allows for greater profits in absolute terms, the latter temporarily raises the rate of profit. The natural consequence is imperialism, where this is combined by having financial capital dominate the global south, super-exploiting labor for super-profits, and via unequal exchange, where technology and tech development is kept in the global north and thus monopoly prices are charged.
This is also why south-south trade is the path to escape underdevelopment, and is why China in particular has been a progressive force for the global south, as they don't withold tech knowledge but instead share it through cooperation and trade. China also doesn't charge the same monopoly prices for tech, which is why global south countries are seeing huge electrification, expansions in EVs, etc.
The west used to have a monopoly on cutting edge tech, they witheld the technology used for creating firearms from African countries for hundreds of years while selectively trading firearms in limited quantities for huge amounts of slaves, as an example. The west forces the global south to rely on them, and forces them into remaining at lower levels of industrial development and refinement. It's also why countries like the Sahel States are working towards cutting unrefined gold exports and upping refined gold exports, ie moving from unfinished raw materials into more finished goods or ancillary materials, and why porkie is terrified of them.
It isn't that goods further along in the commodity production process have more valuable labor time at the higher end, it's that the upper end of the production chain is easier to keep a tech and skill monopoly on. This is what liberals mean by "higher value add" industries, made more naked through Marxist analysis.
Russia wants the four oblasts, which they have been accelerating their advance in in the last few months. Cheap and deadly FPV drones force slow movement in general, but in the last few months strings of Kiev-held strongholds are falling left and right. Ukraine can't field the war much longer either, and the war is becoming increasingly unpopular. What's likely is that the four oblasts go to Russia, Kiev is forced into NATO neutrality, and their millitary is severely crippled. That's absolutely a Russian victory.
Which of these do you think Russia will have to compromise on, and why would you consider the compromise to be a loss?
Read Imperialism, the current highest stage of capitalism(Vladimir Lenin) on ProleWiki
The book Imperialism, the current highest stage of capitalism was written by Lenin between January and June 1916 in Zürich. According to Russian native speakers...ProleWiki
Weird post
Weird replie
Checks instance
Ah...
Record numbers of Ukrainians desert army amid losses to Russia
Record numbers of Ukrainians desert army amid losses to Russia
Thousands of soldiers have fled the army despite the threat of jail or social isolation.Al Jazeera
like this
copymyjalopy e adhocfungus like this.
“Even in Russia, there aren’t that many soldiers going AWOL,” Valentyn Manko, top commander of storm troops, told the Ukrainian Pravda on Saturday.
Yeah no, that is bullshit. Wherever there is war, there is desertion. Nobody wants to die for their country.
like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ likes this.
don't like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ doesn't like this.
Yes "facts" presented without source and as an unnamed editorial from a biased source.
Where are you getting this nonsense "most Russian soldiers are volunteers nonsense" given the fact traditionally and currently military service is mandatory and has been officially since like 1986 or so.
Where are you getting this nonsense “most Russian soldiers are volunteers nonsense”
Putin has refused to send conscripts to the frontlines since Second Chechnya.
This has remained the case with even the Ukrainians admitting that the Russians generally rely on volunteers and have refused to send conscripts into Ukraine.
So a single editorial video from 8 years ago and a single editorial neither with any sort of source and the second straight up being opinion?
So you have an actual source with first hand knowledge that can speak against Russian drafting and notably the increase in drafting since they decided to invade a sovereign nation?
Also the kyiv independent is.... He's me out here. Independent the Ukrainian stance officially is that they are in large part conscripts.
Can you prove that conscripts are generally being used in Ukraine?
There are some cases where conscripts are used, where they signed combat contracts either voluntarily or without knowing what they signed or during the Kursk incursion. But these are exceptions, not the rule.
In 2022, there were some cases of conscripts being inadvertently or illegally deployed to Ukraine. However, when this was found out, they were withdrawn and returned to Russia. The commanding officers responsible for the deployments were punished.
About 600 conscripts involved in operation in Ukraine were recalled to Russia — prosecutor
Twelve officers responsible for sending them abroad have been reprimandedTASS
I don't need to. Their main military is by legislation conscripts. The claimant who said they're mostly volunteer needs to prove that and no a retracted editorial is not a good source.
What's your source dude?
Their main military is by legislation conscripts.
And by law, conscripts are currently prohibited from serving outside the territory of the Russian Federation under any circumstances. Conscripts cannot even participate in peace-keeping missions.
Russia who signed an non aggression agreement with Ukraine in 91 right?
I believe you meant the 1994 Budapest Memorandum. The Budapest Memorandum was first violated by America when they sanctioned Belarus in violation of Article 3 of the Memorandum.
America then stated that the Memorandum was "not legally binding".
Is Ukraine the USA? Last I checked no, no they're not. So the non aggression pact stands, I'm pretty sure it even has a severability clause for participants.
What you're actually saying is that Russia can invade because the USA is shitty? That's a pretty slippery slope bud.
don't like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ doesn't like this.
don't like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ doesn't like this.
don't like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ doesn't like this.
"Anyone who disagrees with what the state department says isn't a real person"
You guys are in for a very rude awakening
don't like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ doesn't like this.
"No u"
Okay so quit repeating state department thought-terminating cliches about the inhumanity of anyone who disagrees with you. At this point you all do it, you all get so defensive, and it's fuckin embarassing. Grow up and have an uncomfortable conversation like an adult.
don't like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ doesn't like this.
"People who don't support Ukraine (or simply acknowledge that they're losing) are just Russian bots"
I'll wait.
Cringe reddit behavior
like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ likes this.
No, I called them a bot because they're spouting shit that doesn't make sense if you read literally anything about it and only reply monosyllabic when pushed to explain themselves.
Though I do enjoy that you're upset I would call someone acting like a bot a bot but you have no issue calling me a state department shill simply because you disagree with me. It's very consistent and logical behavior that doesn't at all make you a hypocrite and likely idiot.
That's a lot of words for "I have destroyed my own theory of mind with an all-consuming internet solipsism and am hellbent on making it everyone else's problem."👍
state department shill
Shills are paid, you're just a useful idiot
like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ likes this.
Helpful non answer. Explain your argument, I'm betting you can't but I'm also willing to be wrong. To be honest I don't think you have a point but sure let's hear how a conscripted military service isn't relying mainly on conscripts.
Lol yes, because I have eyes and can read and I happen to disagree with you I'm a useful idiot. Prove me wrong then bud, you can't but the contortions you attempt aught to be enjoyable to watch.
Prove me wrong then bud, you can’t but the contortions you attempt aught to be enjoyable to watch.
don't like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ doesn't like this.
A video from 2015, remind me again when was Ukraine invaded? Oh yeah 2014. Now do we think nothing has changed in a decade of fighting?
Ya dumb.
Says the person who's throwing out insults rather than insights.
Who said they were winning dipshit, you're just making obtuse assumptions.
don't like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ doesn't like this.
like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ likes this.
like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ likes this.
I have seen many sources that state that Ukraine is suffering from mass desertions:
With Desertions, Low Recruitment, Ukraine's Infantry Crisis Deepens
As Russia presses its offensive, Ukraine faces a crisis that experts say is as critical as its shortages of ammunition and weapons: a dwindling supply of infantry.Yauhen Lehalau (RFE/RL)
like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ likes this.
World news Lemmy definitely has a pro Russia, anti Ukraine bias. Cherry picked articles every day.
I can't imagine why anyone would want Ukraine to fail so badly or celebrate any negative press about them unless they're a paid Russian troll.
you and your compatriots pretty much exclusively parrot the Kremlin’s talking points
Kremlin talking points is when you point out who is clearly winning the war
with articles posted from American sources to cover the connection
Even when it's American media saying it, it's Kremlin talking points. Unfalsifiable orthodoxy. You're operating on religious belief dude
. I don’t know who you’re trying to convince because these posts are routinely heavily downvoted
"The fact that people are currently mad at you for saying this proves it's wrong, just like when Saddam Hussein totally had WMD". I know it sucks to have your bubble burst, but just because you want something to be true, that doesn't make it true. These posts are also heavily upvoted, but of course that doesn't count. When people agree with US propaganda, it's totally organic. When people disagree, it's because of a shadowy foreign influence operation. Again, you are working off of essentially a religious faith, and if it were 2003 you would be calling me a Saddam lover.
your buddies brigade anyone that dissents.
Arguing on a thread that comes up on your own page is now brigading. Anything to give yourself permission to ignore perspectives that aren't sanctioned by capitalist media. In two months time you'll be calling everyone Venezuelan bots for being against that imperial venture. The common denominator is a burning desire never to admit fault, almost like a political narcissism: any dissent is because of a conspiracy against you.
like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ likes this.
like this
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ likes this.
Brother you are legitimately such a pathetic human being.
I’m going to make so much money off people like you. Genuinely, thank you. Keep it up.
People "want Ukraine to fail so badly" and therefore celebrating negative press, because IT IS failing so badly. And for some, like me, this was clear from day one, that is to say 22nd February 2014. And it was clear from the get go that it didn't even stand a remote chance by 2022, despite heavy weapons support from NATO, which means, NATO is now failing badly as well.
And I'm part of those nations so I'm not happy about seeing my nation's economy fail and keep failing worse and worse, while everyone here is still heading West while it should be looking East if it wants economic progress.
In fact, I'd argue that even Russia is still looking way too much Westwards.
The global pace of cultural change towards socialism at this moment is at a snail's pace while economically socialist China has already won hands down and is only advancing further at an accelerating rapid pace while even it's neighbors are pretending that this is some kind of fluke that will magically disappear and they can just ignore it and even aim for further capitalism.
It's complete madness.
This is utter destruction for Ukraine and be extremely costly for the EU, the UK and to a lesser extend the US.
And it's not even the only mistake we're making in the EU, because we're currently making costly mistake after costly mistake.
And the longer you're losing touch with reality, the harder and faster reality will catch up with you.
It happened in Hong Kong and it will happen in Ukraine too.
And in a few years we'll be seeing countries turn around towards socialism with Chinese characteristics, because the China's success isn't going to be isolated for much longer.
He said he chose to desert after realising how perfunctory and ineffective his training was for real combat, and that he would inevitably become a front-line stormtrooper with no chances of survival.“There’s zero training. They don’t care that I won’t survive the very first attack,” Tymofey said, referring to the drill sergeants who were training him in April after police rounded him up in central Kyiv.
He claimed that his trainers were mostly preoccupied with preventing desertions from the centre, which was surrounded by a 3-metre (9.8 ft) high concrete wall covered with barbed wire.
Warhammer 40K is not an instruction manual, guys
EU weighs ban on veggie 'burger' and 'sausage' labels
The measure was introduced by French conservative lawmaker Celine Imart, who argued it would prevent confusion with traditional meat products.
EU weighs ban on veggie 'burger' and 'sausage' labels
European lawmakers face a decision on whether ordinary consumers would be confused by the idea of vegetarian sausages or vegan burgers. Meat producers say it's not that simple.Richard Connor (Deutsche Welle)
like this
thisisbutaname, copymyjalopy e essell like this.
Fortunately, I've heard that they are highly allergic to vegan, so it will be nice to see them collapse in anaphylactic shock after eating vegan where they only wrote "vegan" 16 times on label..
U.S. Authorities Shut Down Major China-Linked AI Tech Smuggling Network
‘Operation Gatekeeper’ Disrupts Trafficking Network and Seizes More Than $50 Million in Advanced GPUs Destined for China and Other Restricted Locations
U.S. Authorities Shut Down Major China-Linked AI Tech Smuggling Network
Two businessmen are now in custody for allegedly violating U.S. export control and smuggling laws.www.justice.gov
U.S. Authorities Shut Down Major China-Linked AI Tech Smuggling Network
U.S. Authorities Shut Down Major China-Linked AI Tech Smuggling Network
Two businessmen are now in custody for allegedly violating U.S. export control and smuggling laws.www.justice.gov
Advent Calendar 10
Advent Calendar
Zen Mischief Photographs
This year for our Advent Calendar we have a selection of my photographs from recent years. They may not be technically the best, or the most recent, but they’re ones which, for various reasons, I rather like.
© Keith C Marshall, 2023
Click the image for a larger view
Hurray! This German State Decides to Save €15 Million Each Year By Kicking Out Microsoft for Open Source
Hurray! This German State Decides to Save €15 Million Each Year By Kicking Out Microsoft for Open Source
Schleswig-Holstein's migration to LibreOffice reaches 80% completion, with a one-time €9 million investment on cards for 2026.Sourav Rudra (It's FOSS)
like this
Lasslinthar, toothpaste_sandwich, deliriousdreams e SolacefromSilence like this.
reshared this
Technology reshared this.
We can no longer allow ourselves to depend on American IT infrastructure.
It can't be, that our public money lands as profits in non European companies.
That should be a given, imho
like this
toothpaste_sandwich likes this.
I 100% agree, but some would consider that a matter of ideology.
The other point about dependency on USA when they are acting with hostility is more pragmatic.
99% of people don't understand all the reason why open source is better for public services, except if we can say it's cheaper. That's the one point they understand, and the one point Microsoft has been attacking most with their propaganda against open source.
like this
massive_bereavement likes this.
Seriously. While I support the change to foss solutions, this is going to go over like a fart in church for the people that were just forced off fax machines and into email a year ago. And there’s a zero percent chance that Germany will use any of those savings for a support infrastructure. The German way is to figure it out, and endure the suffering while you do with the bare minimum of support from people that barely know the shit themselves.
I have a friend who is principal at a high school here in DE and the stories she’s been telling me about the new push to get tablets into the hands of kids is straight fkn Monty Python level absurdity… from the staff!
Germany painted themselves into a corner with their refusal to modernize their tech infrastructure. The “it’s not broken, so don’t fix it” mentality has left them 20 years behind all their neighbors. But, hey, traditions over everything… amirite?
You might want to read this article. Yes, it's in german. Yes, it's behind a paywall. But your analysis is totally wrong here
heise.de/select/ct/2025/5/2502…
Der offene Norden
Während viele Bundesländer weiter auf den Softwareriesen Microsoft setzen und sogar trotz aller Bedenken dessen Cloud nutzen wollen, schlägt Schleswig-Holstein einen eigenen Weg ein.Christian Wölbert, Keywan Tonekaboni (Heise)
And yet it feels and the experience is so true you wouldnt know...
Sincerely, an IT supporter in Germany.
I mean, optionally they could set up a tiny dev shop with that amount and submit the PRs they want to submit. And at worst, they could maintain their own fork.
It'd be a public service in more ways than one.
Inspiration for many more governments!
I have already contacted my, Slovakian government. I should ping them again 😅
Amount of copium is insane in comments. Like, people straight up using fate, like it's a fockin religion, instead of using their head.
Other countries also tried and failed. It's never brings any profit, instead government usually end up losing shit ton of money. Reason is simple: adoption requires contribution. You need to hire new IT specialist, that knows linux and not windows. You need to do requalification of already existing specialist. You need to adapt software. You need to teach every single focking person how to work with new alternative software. And you need to suffer downtime, cause people still new to linux and it's software.
Adoption is very hard and those miserable savings on windows licensing is nothing compared to cost of migration. I'm not even saying "hypothetically", here documented list.
Blind coping will get you nowhere.
Migrations are almost never easy.
You missing the point of my comment, not me.
5 million a year would go a long way towards making their open source solutions meet their needs.
Look, people in comments here think that it will be profitable. That it will save shit ton of money out of thin air. That what I call copium.
I did not said "it's bad" to adopt linux, quite the opposite. What I said is that commenters here operate on a fate, not on a logic and that surprises me.
Upd. Like, you would expect from people on lemmy out of all places, especially in "technology" to be knowledgeable in terms of how IT and business works, but instead it's like I reading comments of children's.
I interpret it as „If they would spend that money on the transitions and advancing the open source projects they consider switching to, that would help the process“.
But maybe that’s just a misunderstanding.
That comment does not state that imo.
What do you meant :c
It's right there, literally in the first sentence:
Amount of copium is insane in comments. Like, people straight up using fate, like it’s a fockin religion, instead of using their head.
Well I was of course talking about the comment you quoted.
5 million a year would go a long way towards making their open source solutions meet their needs.
How is that „using fate instead of using their head“?
Germany already has funds in place specifically for open source projects so that’s not so far off the charts (even though the amount would be lower) so what’s your point ?
Edit:
And to be more specific the point of somehow being profitable is also not coming through to me on this, since when is open source software profitable except when used by for profit companies ?
I can understand the hype, I also know it will be pain for people involved and M$ will do everything to reverse the change possibly leading to even more headaches for said admins etc. as has happened in the past but you can’t finish what you don’t start so I think it’s still good news.
Exactly.
This isn’t a decision being made to cut costs, it’s a strategic move because the EU just assessed how badly they’d be screwed if Trump throws a tantrum and forces American tech companies to disrupt services to their governments.
In addition, the EU has strong data privacy laws and US tech companies are resisting compliance (Elon was recently fined 150million, for example).
This has led to several hearings with tech executives who said that they could not guarantee that the data would stay in the EU and they could not guarantee that the data would not be provided to any other country.
Digital privacy laws don’t mean anything if they don’t apply to the major tech companies and they’ve said that they won’t comply.
I worked for "business automation" company, mainly as tech support of SAAS solution that target accountants\clerks that works with government documents.
I feel sorry for support guys\system administrators and everyone else involved.
No no, I know what you're implying, I was implying that the link doesn't prove what you think it does. I'm assuming you fixated on the Munich project, and that is a convoluted story and the Wikipedia entry on that is not up to date. The latest on the Munich project is that they cancelled the switch back to Windows.
Edit: And I can only assume that you were referring to the Munich story because you threw up the link with zero quotations or direct references. If you have a specific interpretation of that Wikipedia article, then you need cite things. What exactly is the "cost of migration"? Is it one million dollars or 50 million? Did it take a weekend to do, or did it bog down entire departments for months at a time? Is that 50 million dollars over budget? How are the immediate costs vs long term savings measured? Because the savings are measured in decades, not single year or several year licensing costs.
I'm not going to do your job for you. You might think that a months or even years long transition progress is unacceptable, but someone like myself who works in IT would see that is within expectations. If you have a point to make, then MAKE IT.
This is such a shortsighted take. After the initial hurdle of migration, you're free of licenses forever. It won't take long for the savings to match the initial costs, and after that it's more money in the bank until the Sun explodes.
Not to mention the tiny insignificant issue of a foreign private company having backdoors into your government's IT infrastructure. A foreign private company headquartered in Trumpistan of all places.
like this
SolacefromSilence likes this.
I swear to god if this is Schleiswig Holstein again I'm giving it back to Denmark
Edit: of course it is. Ok it's Sønderjylland again now. Prusssians out.
like this
SolacefromSilence likes this.
didn't another german state already try this and fail pretty spectacularly?? cost them WAY more money and then they ended up rolling back to m$??
given that, this is fantastic news! it's good to see people learn from past failed implementations, hopefully learn from their mistakes, and try again instead of just blaming it on bad software
I’ve been trying to find a source but from what I remember the transition was in maybe Munich and it was going fine.
Microsoft opened a new sales or operation center there and got cozy with the government there as quickly as possible to turn them back into a customer.
EDIT: Here is the LiMux endeavor.
Microsoft had announced in 2013 its willingness to move its German headquarters to Munich in 2016, which according to Reiter though, is unrelated to the criticism they've presented against the LiMux project.
Link previews on public groups
Hey everyone, does anyone know how to show link previews in groups? I heard about Instant View and Web Grabber, but can't find them in the public bot directory.
I'm not selfhosting
hi, the bots for link preview are called "www" in the list at deltachat-bot.github.io/public…
also notice that the right place to ask such questions is support.delta.chat/ if you want the developers and more DC users to see your questions
Do you mean InstantView Bot?
It is included in the list of public Delta Chat bots as "www". There are 3 bots with the same name. At least, www2delta@chatmail.woodpeckersnest.space works well.
Here is the list:
deltachat-bot.github.io/public…
Any Other – Silently. Quietly. Going Away (2015)
Adele Nigro è uscita dal gruppo. Ha deciso di lasciare quel folk che geograficamente sta tra la Svezia delle First Aid Kit e le foreste del Nord America, per fare qualcosa di nuovo. E forse di più vero... Leggi e ascolta...
Any Other – Silently. Quietly. Going Away (2015)
Adele Nigro è uscita dal gruppo. Ha deciso di lasciare quel folk che geograficamente sta tra la Svezia delle First Aid Kit e le foreste del Nord America, per fare qualcosa di nuovo. E forse di più vero. Perché, per quanto mi piacessero le Lovecats e il loro EP, non riuscivano a essere niente di più che una bella melodia e un’ottima armonizzazione. Il suo nuovo progetto, la sua nuova band, Any Other, riapre tutte le possibilità... artesuono.blogspot.com/2015/09…
Ascolta il disco: open.spotify.com/intl-it/album…
Home – Identità DigitaleSono su: Mastodon.uno - Pixelfed - Feddit
Home – Identità DigitaleSono su: Mastodon.uno - Pixelfed - Feddit
Any Other – Silently. Quietly. Going Away (2015)
di Gianluca Porta Adele Nigro è uscita dal gruppo. Ha deciso di lasciare quel folk che geograficamente sta tra la Svezia delle First Ai...Silvano Bottaro (Blogger)
TIL Howling Mad Murdock from the A-Team (1983) is also Lt. Barclay from Star Trek: TNG
Actor: Dwight Schultz
I was watching the 2010 version of the A-Team (great movie imo), and I wanted to know what cameos there were (because I suck at recognizing actors). Lo and behold, to my delight, the cross-over of all cross-overs: Star Trek and A-Team.
~I love it when a plan comes together.~
Edit: This just keeps getting better!!!! 53:58 on Netflix.
Dwight Schultz - Actor, Music Department, Additional Crew
Dwight Schultz. Actor: Star Trek : Premier Contact. Dwight Schultz is an American actor who is known for playing Howling Mad Murdock from The A-Team and Reginald Barclay from Star Trek: The Next Generation.IMDb
Lori Petty
Lori Petty (born 14 October 1963; age 62) is the actress who played Noss in the Star Trek: Voyager fifth season episode "Gravity". Petty's career breakthrough came with her role in Point Break (1992, featuring Jack Kehler and Christopher Pettiet).Contributors to Memory Alpha (Fandom, Inc.)
The (successful) end of the kernel Rust experiment
The topic of the Rust experiment was just discussed at the annual Maintainers Summit. The consensus among the assembled developers is that Rust in the kernel is no longer experimental — it is now a core part of the kernel and is here to stay. So the "experimental" tag will be coming off. Congratulations are in order for all of the Rust for Linux team.
The end of the kernel Rust experiment
The topic of the Rust experiment was just discussed at the annual Maintainers Summit. The cons [...]LWN.net
like this
Rozaŭtuno likes this.
It's been 20 years since I did any serious programming, so I'm a bit rusty, is that what Rust is for?
No, Rust is to make you feel like you haven't programmed seriously in 20 years when you first pick it up, even though you are actively doing it.
Before the angry rust "mob" comes to get me: this is a joke. I tried Rust out of genuine curiosity, cobbled together a silly little thing, and quite liked it. The borrow checker made me feel like a total beginner again, in some aspects, and it was great to get that feeling again.
Ultimately it does not fit my needs, but there are a few features I am pretty envious of. I can totally see why it's getting such a following, and I hope it keeps growing.
Enjoy! I don't know what you used to seriously program on but I am willing to bet that the ownership paradigm that it enforces is going to feel at least moderately new to you, unless you forced yourself to code that way anyways.
Plus, as long as you're doing silly little home projects, the compiler errors are the absolute best I've ever seen. Literally just learn basic syntax, try it out, and when it does not compile, the compiler not only tells you why but also what it thinks you're trying to do and how to fix.
Absolute gem of a learning tool.
like this
TVA likes this.
I am willing to bet that the ownership paradigm that it enforces is going to feel at least moderately new to you
Absolutely, I am more used to program closer to the iron mostly C. My favorite was 68000 Assembly, python is nice, but I prefer compiled languages for efficiency. Although that efficiency isn't relevant for basic tasks anymore.
The compiler error messages sound extremely cool. 👍
Ah, a fellow C coder. Never did do assembly with chips older than x86_64 basically. The only old school stuff I touched was writing an interpreter for the CHIP-8. I tried writing some CHIP-8 too, but coming from more recent paradigms, it seemed quite unwieldy to me.
I like python for quick and dirty stuff, I don't like python for being interpreted and it being not obvious what happens under the hood, memory wise, at a glance.
Seeing as you do C I'll say this. The one thing I really did not enjoy, subjectively, with Rust, is that writing "C-style loops" comes with a performance penalty because there are bound checks happening, so the idiomatic version of a loop in Rust usually involves iterators and function composition.
I am stupid. C-loops are easy for me to understand. More sophisticated stuff is hard for my little brain. I'd rather be trusted with my memory access, and be reminded of my stupidity when comes the inevitable segfault. Keeps you humble.
it being not obvious what happens under the hood
To me it feels like it does things I didn't ask it to. So I'm not 100% in control 😋
the idiomatic version of a loop in Rust usually involves iterators and function composition.
What? You need to make a function to make a loop? That can't be right???
C-loops are easy for me to understand.
Absolutely, the way C loops work is perfect. I'm not so fond of the syntax, but at least it's logical in how it works.
What? You need to make a function to make a loop? That can't be right???
Ah no, there is a misunderstanding. You can write C-loops, of course, they just could involve more work under the hood because in order to enforce memory safety, there needs to be some form of bounds checking that does not happen in C. Caveat: I don't know whether that's always true, and what the subtleties are. Maybe I'm wrong about that even, but what is true is that what I am about to say, you will encounter in Rust codebases.
By function composition I meant in the mathematical sense. So, this example explains the gist of it. You may need to throw in a lambda function in there to actually do the job, yeah. I don't know what the compiler actually reduces that to though.
It's just the more functional approach that you can also see with Haskell for example. I find it harder to parse, but that may be lack of training rather than intrinsic difficult.
EDIT: pasted the wrong link to something totally irrelevant, fixed now
Function Composition and Pipelines in Rust: Building Complex Functionality
Explore the art of building complex functionality by composing simple functions and creating pipelines in Rust. Learn how to chain functions using method notation, leverage iterators and combinators, and enhance code readability and maintainability.Software Patterns Lexicon
for element in array.iter() {
println!("{element}");
}
The one thing I really did not enjoy, subjectively, with Rust, is that writing "C-style loops" comes with a performance penalty because there are bound checks happening, so the idiomatic version of a loop in Rust usually involves iterators and function composition.
IIRC you can speed up such checks by putting an assertion in front that checks for the largest index - this will make repeated checks for smaller indices unnecessary. Also, bound checks are often not even visible on modern CPUs because speculative execution, branch prediction, and out-of-order execution. The CPU just assumes that the checks will succeed, and works on the next step.
I had no idea about the assertion! Thanks.
Yes, this is plain wrong or often unimportant on modern architecture, you're right. I, certainly mistakenly, thought this was one of the reasons for the idiomatic version involving function composition, which is the thing I, subjectively, don't enjoy as much.
I stand corrected.
The function composition style comes from functional programming and Rust's OCaml heritage. It can make it easier to reason about invriants and possible sets of values of the result of a computation step.
Rust transforms these to the same or a close equivalent of hand-written loops.
Similar methods are used in specialized, high-performance C++ libraries such as blitz++ and Eigen. But if you mess up bounds, you will get UB with them.
I like Python for quick and dirty stuff
There is one more little secret that not everyone knows:
You do not need lifetime annotations and full borrow checking if you do not care to press out the last drop of performance out of the CPU, or if you just draft experimental code.
In fact, you can very much program in a style that is similar to python:
- just pass function arguments as references, or make a copy (if you need to modify them)
- just return copies of values you want to return.
This makes your code less efficient, yes. But, it avoids to deal with the borrow checker before you really need it, because the copied values get an own life time. It will still be much faster than Python.
This approach would not work for heavily concurrent, multi-threaded code. But not everyone needs Rust for that. There are other quality-of-life factors which make Rust interesting to use.
... and of course it can't beat Python for ease of use. But it is in a good place between Python and C++. A bit more difficult than Java, yes. But when you need to call into such code from Python, it is far easier than Java.
Enjoy! I don't know what you used to seriously program on but I am willing to bet that the ownership paradigm that it enforces is going to feel at least moderately new to you, unless you forced yourself to code that way anyways.
Thinking about ownership is the right way e.g. for C++ as well, so if one has coded professionally in larger systems, it should not be too alien.
One still needs to learn life time annotations. So, assuming that you know, for example, C++, it is an a bit larger hurdle than picking up Java or Go, but it is worth the time.
In many aspects, Rust is far more productive and also more beginner-friendly than C++:
- far better compiler error messages
- a superb and easy-to-use packaging system
- Unicode support
- support for unit testing right in the language
- strong support for a side-effect-free or "functional programming" style which is great for testing and tasks like data analysis or parsing
- better modularization
- avoids implementation inheritance, and the trait system is a bit different but superb
- no undefined behavior (in safe Rust) which means nothing less than that the code does what it says - and this is extremely useful in larger projects
- great support for safe concurrency
- the language and library frees one to think about interfaces and algorithms which is where the big wins for performance are hidden (and IMO one of the key factors for the astounding success of Python).
I could go on... but I need to do other stuff
Thanks for the detailed answer. Preaching to the choir.
The existence of the concept of ownership in languages like C++ is why I threw "moderately" in there. I agree depending on what you take that to mean, it may or may not do some heavy lifting.
For the rest, I'd divide it into hard facts (compiler messages are absolutely undeniable, in any circumstance) and things that can definitely be true depending on your personal use cases. I'm with you on this: for the vast vast majority of tasks commonly understood as software engineering, memory safety is a concern, and a lot, if not all, of your points, are valid.
I must humbly insist that it does not fit my needs, in the sense that memory safety is of no concern to me, and that the restrictions that a compiler-enforced approach imposes make me less productive, and, subjectively, also less enjoyable because causing more friction.
That being said, you may also not consider what I'm currently doing to be software engineering, and that's totally fine. Then we'd agree entirely.
EDIT: also, there are very few languages less productive and beginner-friendly than C++ in my opinion. The proverbial bar is in hell. But you are talking to an unreasonable C++ hater.
EDIT: also, there are very few languages less productive and beginner-friendly than C++ in my opinion.
I am a professional C++ developer with 20 years of experience and have worked in about eight other languages professionally, while learning and using a dozen more in hobby projects.
I agree with you here. The only areas where specifics are worse are package management in Python, and maintainability of large SIMULINK models.
That's the sort of indictment of C++ I like to hear. It's not just me then. I sometimes feel like I'm taking crazy pills with some colleagues who are super enthusiastic about it still.
But again, I'm stupid, I know I'm stupid, and C++ has way too many features and convoluted behaviours which are hard for me to remember and reason about. It often feels like it makes me think more about the language problems than the actual problem I'm supposed to work on. It may say more about me than the language, but I do feel validated with comments like this.
Generally no. As soon as a class hierarchy becomes moderately complex, implementation inheritance makes code very hard to maintain, because you need to read the whole stack of classes to see what a single change will actually do.
Rust has another system, traits and trait implementations.
What have you been doing since you stopped programming?
Alternatively, why did you stop (seriously) programming?
Lots of "modern" languages don't interop terribly well with other languages, because they need a runtime environment to be executed.
So, if you want to call a Python function from Java, you need to start a Python runtime and somehow pass the arguments and the result back and forth (e.g. via CLI or network communication).
C, C++, Rust and a few other languages don't need a runtime environment, because they get compiled down to machine code directly.
As such, you can call functions written in them directly, from virtually any programming language. You just need to agree how the data is laid out in memory. Well, and the general agreement for that memory layout is the C ABI. Basically, C has stayed the same for long enough that everyone just uses its native memory layout for interoperability.
And yeah, the Rust designers weren't dumb, so they made sure that Rust can also use this C ABI pretty seamlessly. As such, you can call Rust-functions from C and C-functions from Rust, with just a bit of boilerplate in between.
This has also been battle-tested quite well already, as Mozilla used this to rewrite larger chunks of Firefox, where you have C++ using its C capabilities to talk to Rust and vice versa.
No. The Rust code in the kernel is GPLv2 just like the rest of the kernel. The licence of the compiler has nothing to do with that, that's nonsense Rust haters make up.
You can argue against independent projects like the Rust coreutils not using a copyleft license, but that has nothing to do with Rust or the kernel. There are independent C projects without non-copyleft licenses too.
like this
TVA likes this.
Ah thank you. You likely guessed the reason for the question.
Many popular projects written in Rust, including the UUtils core utils rewrite, are MIT licensed as Rust is. There have been people that purposely confuse things by saying that “the Rust community” is undermining the GPL. I can see how that may lead somebody to believe that there is some kind of inherent licence problem with code written in Rust.
Code written in Rust can of course be licensed however you want from AGPL to fully proprietary.
I personally perceive a shift in license popularity towards more permissive licenses at least with the “younger generation”. The fact that so many Rust projects are permissively licensed is just a consequence of those kinds of licenses being more popular with the kinds of “modern” programmers that would choose Rust as a language to begin with. Those programmers would choose the same licenses even they used the GCC toolchain. But the “modern” languages they have to choose from are things like Rust, Swift, Zig, Go, or Gleam (all permissively licensed ). Python and TypeScript are also still trendy (also permissively licensed).
Looking at that list, it is pretty silly to focus on Rust’s license. Most of the popular programming languages released over the past 20 years are permissively licensed.
Many popular projects written in Rust, including the UUtils core utils rewrite, are MIT licensed as Rust is. There have been people that purposely confuse things by saying that “the Rust community” is undermining the GPL.
How would that ever be a problem in any case? I mean I'm not that versed in licensing stuff, but MIT explicitly allows sublicensing, so if in doubt just slap a GPL-sticker on the MIT code and you are good, no?
I have never heard the licensing of Rust being raised as a concern for the Linux kernel.
As Charles Babbage would say, “I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.”
The distro I use builds the entire Linux kernel with Clang which uses the same license as Rust. Linux is bound by the same modified GPL license regardless of what compiler I use to build it.
The compiler has no impact on the license applied to the code you build with that compiler. You can use closed source tools to build open source software and vice versa.
And, of course, the Rust license is totally open source as it is offered as both MIT and Apache. Apache 2.0 even provides patent guarantees which can matter for something like a compiler.
If you prefer to use GPL tools yourself, you may want to keep an eye on gccrs.
A legitimate concern about Rust may be that LLVM (Rust) supports a different list of hardware than GCC does. The gccrs project addresses that.
The ALIS Codex: Learn. Survive. Connect.
reshared this
Technology reshared this.
Why We Make ALIS: The Enemy Within
reshared this
Technology reshared this.
" Alis? Who the fuck is Alis?"
Smokie, probably
Eileen Higgins wins Miami mayoral runoff, breaking 30-year Democratic drought
Eileen Higgins wins Miami mayoral runoff, breaking 30-year Democratic drought
Higgins defeated former city manager Emilio Gonzalez with 59% of the vote, pledging to tackle housing affordability, climate resilience, and restore trust at City Hall.Doug Myers (CBS Miami)
like this
copymyjalopy e dflemstr like this.
[Pluribus Spoilers] A distressing thought about Koumba and the hive...
The hive exist, or desire to please the survivors. However they want. Koumba has used this more than anyone else to his own advantage to live the life of a decadent, hedonistic and shallow playboy - roleplaying as James Bond and surrounding himself and having sex with women. Now, to me - this is very much - at the minimum - taking advantage of them. The women he's having sexual relations with are not who they were, and it is unlikely - even if the hive came to him and suggested it (as I suspect they did) - that the women before the joining would be remotely interested in doing this. They are not them. Who they were has been lobotomised, malformed and disappeared into the hive - segmented up into billions of bodies.
I've seen some people (not here, but elsewhere) suggest that this behaviour is okay because the hive is consenting. The women he's picking show enthusiastic and active consent. This to me is disgraceful, not just in the context of that - but also what could be the case if Koumba had different, darker interests.
Now the show will not address this (and rightfully so) - but it still seems true to me regardless of that. If Koumba was a pedophile, they would provide him with children he requested - and the children would provide active consent. Just like the women he picks now, they wouldn't be who they were. There is no concept of childhood or child innocence anymore. The hive literally can't say no unless it contradicts their survival or asks them to hurt others.
So to anyone who thinks the hive is a good thing (and some people actually do), or that Koumba is doing no wrong with what he's doing. This should be a point to consider.
In theory they aren't individuals anymore, they are appendages. So there would be no issue with consent the same way you decide consent for your hand or mouth. In a sense your mouth consents because it is part of the you making that decision.
Except... If there were any chance your hand could separate from you and become an individual in the future it'd be immoral to use it for sex now. And Carol is already very confident that it's possible to reverse the Joining. But even if she wasn't it was always a possibility. So having sex with any of them is incredibly wrong, which should be obvious to anybody on a gut level.
Konsole now prompts for passwords and other questions in pop-ups??
I mean, who thought of this as a good idea? I find it rather distracting. I'm trying to SSH into a computer and blam...a massive pop-up blocks me from reading what was before or anything else...just the pop-up in front, blocking text. It has the hidden password text field thing, but this one is to type yes/no to whether accept the server's cert. Y hit enter after typing yes...and blam, another pop-up, this one is for the actual password.
How can I disable these pop-up prompts? I want to be prompted as text, on the konsole main screen, as it always was. I haven't changed anything, because well, this is a brand new install. It started happening on a different computer and found it equally irritating.
Any idea how can I disable this? Thanks so much!
ssh-askpass utility to prompt you for passwords. You can configure it to always prompt over the TTY of the parent process that executed the ssh-askpass command.
Linux Foundation aims to become the Switzerland of AI agents
An attempt to provide vendor-neutral oversight as the agent train barrels on
Linux Foundation aims to become the Switzerland of AI agents
: An attempt to provide vendor-neutral oversight as the agent train barrels onThomas Claburn (The Register)
Rivian is building its own AI assistant
The EV maker will likely share more details on its upcoming AI & Autonomy Day scheduled for December 11.
Rivian is building its own AI assistant | TechCrunch
The EV maker will likely share more details on its upcoming AI & Autonomy Day scheduled for December 11.Kirsten Korosec (TechCrunch)
Had an issue with an update and had no networl access after reboot. How many kernals can be available in grub?
Still pretty new to Linux, I'm on Ubuntu Studio 24.04 LTS and had some issues with updates through the updater with errors and so I did sudo apt update/upgrade instead. Something went wrong and had errors, and after a reboot I had no internet access, Ethernet or WiFi, and no options to connect to anything. Running sudo lshw -c network showed unclaimed networks.
In case anyone has a similar issue, I fixed it by:
1. Reboot, spam shift to get into grub
2. Advanced options
3. Recovery mode for the lower number kernel
4. Enable networking
5. Fix broken packages
My question is about number 3. There were 4 kernel options, 2 normal with a recovery for each (I can't remember the specifics but one had 37 and the other 36). I selected recovery 36 as it was the older kernel. Is that amount of options (2 for each kernel) normal or can I create more? Like 37, 36, 35, 34, etc.
I was in panic mode since this PC is for work, and thought it might be nice to have more older kernel options if possible. I've also learned my lesson and am currently running Timeshift.
If the partition where your OS stores boot images at is large enough, you can have practically infinitely many kernels in grub.
Some distros store those in a boot partition. Some store it in the root partition subdir. I don't know about ubuntu tbh.
I once had a 2gb boot partition and I needed to add a graphics stack to the boot image so I could use a touchscreen keyboard during boot to enter a LUKS password. That made a single kernel image over 1gb, so I could only have one...
It's been a long time since I used Ubuntu, but at the time I did I recall running into issues keeping too many old kernels. They were stored in a fixed space folder (or maybe partition?) that was like 100MB and sometimes wouldn't clear out automatically, so I remember this. May not be relevant now, but if it is, space in the storage folder is the limiting factor so you would need to change that. If it IS a partition, then you would need to deal with all that is involved with that.
edited to add that my current OS only stores three or four as well. I have never really dived into it.
The Quest for Reasonably Secure Operating Systems
The Quest for Reasonably Secure Operating Systems
I never worried on Windows about security as much as I should have, it just so happens I've been lucky to have never been hit with ransomware. By the time...yazomie > tech
like this
adhocfungus likes this.
What I want out of a secure Linux (or BSD) system is full (top-to-bottom) sandboxing of all components to enforce least privilege. I am want to learn how to make my own distro (most likely for personal use) which uses strong SELinux policies, in conjunction with syd-3 sandboxing, which seems like the most robust and feature rich, unprivileged sandbox in both the Linux/BSD worlds (also it's totally in safe Rust from what i can tell).
Another thing that I would love to make is a drop-in replacement for Flatpak that is backwards compatible but uses syd-3 instead. It has much better exploit protections than Bubblewrap, and is actually an OOTB secure sandbox. I dont know much about the internals of Flatpak, or how to use xdg-desktop-portal, but I am going to start more simple with a Bubblejail alternative. One major advantage of syd is that you can modify an already running sandbox, so theoretical you could show a popup that says something like "App1 is requesting microphone access.", where you could toggle on without needing to restart the app.
Need to get better at coding tho lol
SELinux is used on all the Fedora Immutable distros, and the OpenSUSE Immutable distro.
It's actually much easier to do SELinux in Immutable distros in a lot of ways than non-immutable. Especially the bootc-style ones where even more of the system is defined and prebuilt before deployment.
AppArmor is OK, but the whole issue is that you have to know what to throw into it. That's also its benefit, you can focus in the high risk things and ignore the low risk things. It keeps expanding profiles more and more though, and ironically the ultimate destination is everything being under MAC.
Syd3, and gvisor, a similar project in go aren't really sandboxes but instead user mode emulation of the linux kernel. I consider them more secure than virtual machines because code that programs run is not directly executed on your cpu.
Although syd3 doesn't seem to emulate every syscall, only some, I know rhat gvisor does emulate every syscall.
If you compare CVE's for gvisor and CVE's for xen/kvm, you'll see that they are worlds apart.
Xen has 25 pages: app.opencve.io/cve/?vendor=xen
Gvisor has 1: app.opencve.io/cve/?q=gvisor
Now, gvisor is a much newer product, but it is still a full 7 years old compared to xen's 22 years of history. For something that is a third of the age, it has 1/25th of the cve's.
There is a very real argument to be made that the hardened openbsd kernel, when combined with openbsd's sandboxing, is more secure than xen, which you brought up.
Xen CVEs and Security Vulnerabilities - OpenCVE
Explore the latest vulnerabilities and security issues of Xen in the CVE databaseapp.opencve.io
I could use gvisor inside distrobox inside an appVM in Qubes, couldn't I?
Many CVE's for Xen were discovered and patched by the Qubes folks, so that's a good thing...
As for OpenBSD, I thought I mentioned in the blog post that I'm intending to use it as sys-net VM inside Qubes if not as HVM alongside my Linux appVMs, for when I need Linux. The best of both worlds, so to say.
to answer your first question, kind of. Gvisor (by google btw) uses the linux kernels sandboxing to sandbox the gvisor process itself.
Distrobox also uses the linux kernels sandboxing, which is how linux based containers work.
Due to issues with the attack surface of the linux's kernels sandboxing components, the ability to create sandboxing or containers inside sandboxes or containers is usually restricted.
What this means is that to use gvisor inside docker/podman (distrobox) you must either loosen the (kinda nonexistent) distrobox sandbox, or you must disable gvisors sandboxing that it applies to itself. You lose the benefit, and you would be better off just using gvisor alone.
It's complicated, but basically the linux's kernels containers/sandboxing features can't really be "stacked".
sandboxing is not the best practice on Linux… So I’m better off with Qubes than with Secureblue
No, no, no.
It's no that sandboxing is the best practice, it's just that attempting to "stack" linux sandboxes is mostly ineffective. If I run kvm inside xen, I get more security. If I run a linux container inside a linux container, I only get the benefit of one layer. But linux sandboxes are good practice.
I do agree that secureblue sucks, but I don't understand your focus on Qubes. To elaborate on my criticisms let me explain, with a reply to this comment:
Many CVE’s for Xen were discovered and patched by the Qubes folks, so that’s a good thing…
If really, really care about security, it's not enough to "find and patch CVE's". The architecture of the software must be organized in such a way that certain classes of vulnerabilities are impossible — so no CVE's exist in the first place. Having a lack of separation between different privilege levels turns a normal bug into a critical security issue.
Xen having so many CVE's shows that is has some clear architectural flaws, and that despite technically being a "microkernel", the isolation between the components is not enough to prevent privilege isolation flaws.
Gvisor having very few CVE's over it's lifespan shows it has a better architecture. Same for OpenBSD — despite having a "monolithic" kernel, I would trust openbsd more in many cases (will elaborate later).
Now, let's talk about threat model. Personally, I don't really understand your fears in this thread. You visited a site, got literally jumpscared (not even phised), and are now looking at qubes? No actual exploit was done.
You need to understand that the sandboxing that browsers use is one of the most advanced in existence currently. Browser escapes are mostly impossible... mostly.
In addition, you need to know that excluding openbsd, gvisor, and a few other projects almost all other projects will have a regular outpouring of CVE's at varying rates, depending on how well they are architectured.
Xen is one of those projects. Linux is one of those projects. Your browser is one of those projects. Although I consider Linux a tier below in security, I consider Xen and browsers to exist at a similar tier of security.
What I'm trying to say, is that any organization/entity that is keeping a browser sandbox escape, will most definitely have a Linux privilege escalation vulnerability, and will probably also have a Xen escape and escalation vulnerability.
The qube with the browser might get compromised, but dom0 would stay safely offline, that’s my ideal, not the utopic notion of never possibly getting attacked and hacked.
This is just false. Anybody who is able to do the very difficult task of compromising you through the browser will probably also be able to punch through Xen.
not the utopic notion of never possibly getting attacked and hacked.
This is true actually. Browser exploits are worth millions or even tens of millions of dollars. And they can only really be used a few times before someone catches them and reports them so that they are patched.
Why would someone spend tens of millions of dollars to compromise you? Do you have information worth millions of dollars on your computer? It's not a "utopic notion", it's being realistic.
If you want maximum browser security, ~~disable javascript~~ use chromium on openbsd. Chromium has slightly stronger sandboxing than firefox, although chromium mostly outputs CVE's at the same rate as firefox. Where it really shines, is when combined with Openbsd's sandboxing (or grapheneos' for phones).
Sure, you can run Xen under that setup. But there will be no benefit, you already have a stronger layer in front of Xen.
TLDR: Your entire security setup is only actually as strong as your strongest layer/shield. Adding more layers doesn't really offer a benefit. But trying to add stronger layers is a waste of your time because you aren't a target.
I am excited to see Chimera Linux mature because iy seems like a distro which prioritizes a simple but modern software stack.
Features of Chimera that I like include:
- Not run by fascists
- Not SystemD (dinit)
- Not GNU coreutils (BSD utils)
- Not glibc (musl)
- Not jemalloc (mimalloc)
- Proper build system, not just Bash scripts in a trenchcoat
What I would like:
- MAC (SELinux)
- Switch to Fish over Bash (because it is a much lighter codebase)
- Switch from mimalloc to hardened_malloc (or mimalloc built with secure flag). Sadly hardened_malloc is only x64 or aarch64
- Hardened sysctl kernel policy
What are the pros/cons of GNU coreutils vs BSD utils?
EDIT : from their website : Desktop environment -> GNOME. What a choice, not for me.
First, I use either Niri or KDE Plasma on Chimera Linux. Both are just an “apk add” away. You do not have to use GNOME. There is even a KDE live image so you do not even have to run GNOME once to install if you do not want.
I really like the BSD utils and have come to prefer them. Well written. Sleek. Well documented. The man pages are a walk through UNIX history. They feel “right” to me.
That said, the BSD userland is frequently a pain when interacting with the rest of the Linux universe. You cannot even build a stock kernel.org kernel without running into compatibility problems. The first time I built the COSMIC desktop on Chimera, I had to edit a dozen files to make them “BSD” compatible.
Sed, find, tar, xargs, and grep have all caused me problems. And you need bash obviously. But bash is no big deal because it has a different name.
The key GNU utils are available in the Chimera repos. But you get files named gfind, gtar, gxargs, gsed, etc. so scripts will not find them.
You often have to either add the ‘g’ to the beginning of utilities in scripts or edit the arguments to work with the BSD versions.
I mean, most things are compatible and I bet most of the command-line switches you actually use will work with the BSD utils. But I would be lying if I did not say third-party scripts are a hassle.
If I could do Chimera all over again, I would make it bsdtar and bsdsed (or bsed maybe) for the BSD versions.
Maybe the regular names could be symlinks with sed pointing to bsdsed by default but you could point it to gsed instead of you want. The system Chimera scripts and tools could use the longer names (eg. bsdsed) instead of the symlinks. The GNU tools could be absent by default like they are now. That would be the best of both worlds. The base system would have the advantages of the BSD tools (like easier builds as outlined on the Chimera site), the system could be GNU free if you want, and you could have a system that actually works out of the box more often with third-party scripts.
It pains me to say this. I would prefer not to use the GNU stuff but the GNU tools are the de facto standard on Linux and many, many things assume them. No wonder UUtils aims for 100% compatibility.
Anyway, even with what I say above, Chimera is my favourite distro. The dev can be a little prickly, but they do nice work.
PATH modification:> type find
find is /bin/find
> type gfind
gfind is /usr/local/bin/gfind
> sudo mkdir -p /usr/local/opt/gnuutils/bin/
> sudo ln -s /usr/local/bin/gfind /usr/local/opt/gnuutils/bin/find
> PATH="/usr/local/opt/gnuutils/bin:$PATH" type find
find is /usr/local/opt/gnuutils/bin/findor in script form:
\#!/bin/sh
# install as /usr/local/bin/gnu-run
# invoke as gnu-run some-gnu-specific-script script-args
export PATH="/usr/local/opt/gnuutils/bin:$PATH"
exec "$@"/usr/local/opt/... is probably not the best place to put this but you get the idea, you can make it work with POSIX tools. I don't know that much about Chimera Linux but I'd be very surprised if nobody has thought of doing this systematically, e.g. as part of a distributable package.
Thank you for the suggestion. I am ashamed to confess that a temporary PATH variable had not occurred to me.
I first ran into these issues creating package templates. Chimera has a beautiful package build system where packages get built in containers and source code gets downloaded into the container and and built against a clean environment. As you point out, creating a package that creates the symlinks as a dependency (along with the GNU utils) could be a viable approach here. Maybe even just in /usr/local. The GNU utils get installed to /usr/bin in Chimera and the container gets recycled for every new package. The distro would never accept such hacky packages but I can use them myself.
For just generally working in the distro at the command-line, your temporary path idea could work well.
Thanks again. I appreciate it!
Chimera Linux is great. APK and cports are so good I cannot imagine going back to anything else.
Bash is not the default shell though. Chimera uses the Almquist Shell from FreeBSD. Other Linux distros have “dash” which is basically an Almquist variant.
Almquist is lighter than fish and fish is not POSIX compatible.
Bash is available in the Chimera Linux repos of course and is required for many common scripts.
“Not run by fascists”. Sometimes I wonder.
It works decently with just 8 GB RAM, and I'm going to upgrade the RAM.
Secureblue is based on sandboxing rather than paravirtualization, and I'm not sure that's secure enough for me.
I do agree it's likely more secure, but the tradeoff for common use cases (gaming, development) is steep. I could see using it solely for browsing and messaging people
You can also just slot secure blue into a qube I believe
You aren't going to like this:
Because if you got yourself pwned by a malicious link in discord, your account highjacked, etc., then having discord in a vm, container, chroot, jail, or whatever won't help you on the server-side api abuse that got you pwned. In this case, you yourself should have been more vigilant.
From your article, and with respect, I think its nice you're thinking more about security, but you're mixing up quite a few concepts, and you should probably make smaller moves toward security that you actually understand, instead of going all-in on qubes with only a vague concept of the difference between sandboxing and paravirtualization.
The weakest part of any security system is the people.
Well, maybe not any, but most ;D
edit: thought i was funny but it sounds mean now. but i know how you feel, i got pwned once like 10y ago and they sent spam from my skype...
Sure, but if the compromise stays within its own app, like for a browser, sandboxing won't help.
The bulk, and I mean like 95% of the compromises I see are normal employees clicking on things that "look legit".
Excel is now wrapped in a browser. Discord, almost all work apps are all wrapped in a browser. So you can be completely locked down between apps like grapheneos, but if you are choosing to open links, no amount of sandboxing is going to save you.
This is why we deploy knowbe4 and proofpoint, cause people are a liabilities, even to themselves.
Clicking on things that look legit is a critical part of interaction with computers. Programs should not be installed unintentionally, so first and foremost Office Macros should not be enabled by default (and eventually Microsoft did disable them).
Recently I think the main avenue for malware is to send a PDF with a fake popup for an update, that links to a phishing site and prompts you to download an exe with malware. That kind of thing is a harder issue to solve, but at the very least an OS should probably not let that program update your BIOS.
Yes, but I never said you won't get pwned. I said that it would limit how it could be done and what damage it could do.
For instance, if you click a link and download something shitty, it can't just steal your auth tokens on GrapheneOS because all of that is isolated to only the program that uses them. Meanwhile on Windows/Linux there are tons of Python scripts that do that. It would take extra steps on GrapheneOS for someone to use social engineering to hack someone's Discord/Bank/etc account, which could be enough to prevent it for some people.
Another step up is the confidential computing project. Requires hardware that supports it though, which sucks, but takes the virtual hardware concept and adds multi key memory encryption on top.
Remember though security without a threat model is just paranoia, so what level of hoops and investment you need really depends on what your threats actually look like.
I personally love containers and Macsec. It limits most of my concerns. I want to mess with confidential containers next, which is to say lightweight VMs in containers with memory encryption set, but thats all future to me. The irony is that I then I have to figure out attestation better for those machines since from the host they are black boxes.
iOS 26 doesn't offer privacy settings at all for "Home" app
It appears that even if you don't have the app installed, it is in Settings > Apps. But there's no option at all, to customise its privacy settings.
Downloading the app also doesn't let you customise its privacy settings. In fact, the app then disappears altogether from the privacy settings! It doesn't even appear anymore in the "Hidden Apps". Removing it again however, shows the app popping up again in the settings.
What's more, it's deliberately erroneously labelled as "Start Screen" when you don't have downloaded it.
Ridiculous. One more reason to go to a Fairphone or something like it.
However, you can edit it... but very cumbersomely, only by going to Settings > Siri > App Access ... and then suddenly, you see the app!
This seems like it's straight up illegal.
If by “privacy settings” you mean controlling what system permissions the Home app has, you’re out of luck. It’s a semi-default app and may be more deeply embedded into iOS than is apparent.
If you’re trying to control what other apps have access to HomeKit data, you can find that in Privacy & Security.
Man Charged for Wiping Phone Before CBP Could Search It
adhocfungus likes this.
don't like this
adhocfungus doesn't like this.
[2024-10-27] OpenZFS new deduplication mechanism and why you still may not want to use it
OpenZFS deduplication is good now and you shouldn't use it
OpenZFS 2.3.0 will be released any day now, and it includes the new “Fast Dedup” feature. My team at Klara spent many months in 2023 and 2024 working on it, and we reckon it’s pretty good, a huge step up from the old dedup as well as being a solid ba…despair labs
(ADC) “Smartphone, dopamina e dipendenza: il mio ESPERIMENTO di 7 Giorni”
Caspiterina, De Concimi ha cacciato fuori questo esperimentino pazzo 2 settimane fa e io me l’ero perso… l’ho scoperto solo stasera per caso: 1 settimana senza lo smarfonino (o smarfonone, nel suo caso) per capire se è possibile vivere senza. Non tanto in senso di pratica universale del mondo, perché purtroppo al giorno d’oggi l’avere […]
octospacc.altervista.org/2025/…
(ADC) “Smartphone, dopamina e dipendenza: il mio ESPERIMENTO di 7 Giorni”
youtube.com/watch?v=yKM4mMAxtE…Caspiterina, De Concimi ha cacciato fuori questo esperimentino pazzo 2 settimane fa e io me l’ero perso… l’ho scoperto solo stasera per caso: 1 settimana senza lo smarfonino (o smarfonone, nel suo caso) per capire se è possibile vivere senza. Non tanto in senso di pratica universale del mondo, perché purtroppo al giorno d’oggi l’avere ed usare costantemente uno smartphone è qualcosa di praticamente forzato dall’esterno, sia dalla società che per certi versi dagli Stati, e con ogni anno che passa la possibilità di poter rimanere senza in tal misura si fa sempre più sottile, quindi non è questo il punto del video… Il suo discorso è più che altro sull’abitudine, la dipendenza, e queste minchiatine qui. 😳
È un caso spassoso che, come la sua sfida sia stata di 1 settimana, così io stasera — dopo aver trovato appunto per caso questo video, che credo abbia qualche spuntino di riflessione, e quindi mi è venuta la voglia di postare — stia scrivendo qui dopo 1 settimana intera che non tocco il fritto misto… E beh, di un caso si tratta, perché io non ho affatto mandato a fanculo il telefono, ma semplicemente sono evidentemente a corto di olio, quindi è difficile friggere. (In altre parole, l’anedonia mi distrugge, e quindi col piffero che esce qualcosa da scrivere qui, di lungo e sensato… ma, anche oggi pomeriggio ho applicato il mio fix vietato, e dunque stasera ho la voglia di fare le cose, che wow… però non divaghiamo.) 🙏
Lui avrebbe voluto fare proprio una settimana senza Internet, ma non è riuscito a giustificare il prendersi una settimana di ferie (che sarebbe la conseguenza logica di una tale scelta per lui, visto che il suo lavoro non è raccogliere i pomodori), quindi ha ripiegato sul semplicemente mettere via lo smartphone pieghevole fantastico moderno che ha, e ritornare ai tempi antichi del suo vecchio cellulare Nokia, mettendo la SIM in quello e non usando più lo smartphone per niente; se non per i codici della banca (e zio merdone, le banche e le loro app!) e per registrare pezzi di vlog. 👌
Cosa ne può mai venire allora fuori da questa cosa? Boh; per lui, che può fare a meno di avere certe app molto distraenti sul cellulare (incluse alcune che, nonostante ciò, avrebbero un giustificabile scopo lavorativo, come YouTube Studio; quindi non parliamo solo di minchiatine), decidendo quindi di levarle da lì, allocandole solo al PC e a tempi della giornata più controllati, avendo così un potenziamento dell’attenzione e sprecando dunque meno tempo durante tutti i giorni e quindi nella vita… e, per chi guarda, invece, veramente boh; nel senso, dipende. 🍇
Io, in realtà, grandi problemi con il telefonone in questo senso non sento di averne… ma non tanto perché ne ho in realtà di ben più gravi in altri sensi—ehm, volevo dire, non solo perché non è la prima volta che sento queste cose; quanto più per il fatto che innanzitutto il mio uso dello smarfonone è abbastanza diverso dalla media delle persone della mia generazione (che, le statistiche lo dicono, è comunque quella più fissata), e poi perché tante misure riparative o preventive dell’abuso dello smartphone sono per me normalità da tempo… per una semplice questione di miei gusti e tendenze, in realtà, lol. 😊
Alla fine del video, Alessandrone suggerisce alcune cose effettivamente utili, che per me infatti non sono nuove. Piattaforme social che non aggiungono praticamente nulla alla mia vita non le uso (ma in realtà, curiosamente, come ho già detto, se le iniziassi ad usare non riuscirei ad acquisire l’abitudine; mi scoccerei naturalmente e smetterei senza farci caso)… Il telefono certamente non è il mio unico robo di battaglia, e anzi, a casa non ho davvero tanto la voglia di usarlo quando posso fare qualcosa ugualmente o meglio dal PC (come scrivere)… E beh, a me le notifiche danno proprio fastidio dentro (ma questa sarà altrettanto la potenza del mio autismo), quindi le uniche che permetto al telefono di ricevere in qualsiasi momento sono chiamate ed SMS, nient’altro (mentre, sul tablet, praticamente zero). 😈
In realtà, però, devo ammettere che dei problemi di abitudini zombi li ho pure io, a riguardo… e quindi sì, assolutamente evito di tenere collegamenti rapidi a cose che apro di continuo senza motivo, altrimenti è la fine, ma mi trovo a dover ogni tanto cambiare anche la disposizione del drawer delle app o altre cose di questo tipo, perché sennò non basta… Ma, questo non è tanto un problema di dopamina, visto che mi accorgo che per me pure il fottuto Alt+Tab sul PC è compulsivo; proprio nel mentre di scrivere questo post, l’ho premuto non so quante volte… e l’unica finestra che ho portato in foreground è stata la mia cartella Download rimasta aperta da poco fa, non una app con meccanismo da slot machine. (E no, impostare la scala di grigi non mi aiuta con ciò.) 🥴
Boh, complessivamente l’esperimento è gnam, e… io non lo farei, perché ehh… francamente, a me, lo smartphone, quando serve serve. Se voglio annotare qualcosa devo farlo, e idem se voglio cercare sul web delle robe, o se ho da scattare delle foto e persino modificarle al volo, nonché attuare rapidi momenti di sysadmin e programmazione in giro, visto che un tablet sarebbe troppo grosso e dunque non potrei portarlo ovunque… Però, allo stesso tempo, non è assolutamente la fine del mondo se in un certo momento non posso aprire Pinterest o Telegram per guardare (e pigniare…) i miei memini; basta che ho un manga da leggere, o una console per giocare, e riesco tranquillamente a non morire. (…E sì, sto implicando che se non ho la possibilità di scrivere quando voglio è improbabile io possa sopravvivere; ma insomma, se esplodessero gli smartphone domani userei il 3DS, e se esplodesse tutta l’elettronica del pianeta userei la carta.) 👍
#adc #dipendenza #dopamina #esperimento #smartphone
- YouTube
Profitez des vidéos et de la musique que vous aimez, mettez en ligne des contenus originaux, et partagez-les avec vos amis, vos proches et le monde entier.www.youtube.com
Glauber Braga é expulso do plenário após ocupação da Mesa Diretora
Glauber Braga é expulso do plenário após ocupação da Mesa Diretora
Congressista foi levado por policiais legislativos para fora do plenário após protesto contra possível cassação.Congresso em Foco
Can DSA Hold Mamdani Accountable? Its Co-Chairs Respond
- YouTube
Profitez des vidéos et de la musique que vous aimez, mettez en ligne des contenus originaux, et partagez-les avec vos amis, vos proches et le monde entier.www.youtube.com
Segal Secrets: docs reveal Antisemitism Envoy's big pay day - Michael West
Official Propaganda for Caribbean Military Buildup Includes “Crusader Cross”
cross-posted from: news.abolish.capital/post/1260…
An official U.S. military social media account on Monday shared a photo collage that included a symbol long affiliated with extremist groups — and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.In a post on X trumpeting the deployment of troops to the Caribbean, U.S. Southern Command, or SOUTHCOM, shared an image that prominently displayed a so-called Jerusalem cross on the helmet of a masked commando.
The Jerusalem cross, also dubbed the “Crusader cross” for its roots in Medieval Christians’ holy wars in the Middle East, is not inherently a symbol of extremism. It has, however, become popular on the right to symbolize the march of Christian civilization, with anti-Muslim roots that made it into something of a logo for the U.S. war on terror.
Tattoos of the cross, a squared-off symbol with a pattern of repeating crosses, have appeared on the bodies of people ranging from mercenaries hired by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to Hegseth himself.
Now, the symbol has reared its head again to advertise President Donald Trump’s military buildup against Venezuela — an overwhelmingly Catholic country — and boat strikes in the Caribbean.
U.S. military forces are deployed to the #SOUTHCOM area of responsibility in support of #OpSouthernSpear, @DeptofWar-directed operations, and @POTUS' priorities to disrupt illicit drug trafficking and protect the homeland. pic.twitter.com/vLvg9fQ5Lx— U.S. Southern Command (@Southcom) December 8, 2025
“As with all things Trump, it’s a continuation, with some escalation, and then a transformation into spectacle,” said Yale University historian Greg Grandin, whose work focuses on U.S. empire in Latin America.
The social media post came amid rising controversy over a series of strikes on boats allegedly carrying drugs off the coast of Venezuela, dubbed Operation Southern Spear.
[
Read Our Complete Coverage
License to Kill
---------------](theintercept.com/series/licens…)Hegseth is alleged to have ordered a so-called “double-tap” strike, a follow-up attack against a debilitated boat that killed survivors clinging to the wreckage for around 45 minutes. The U.S. has carried out 22 strikes since the campaign began in September, killing a total of 87 people.
The Pentagon’s press office declined to comment on the use of the Jerusalem cross, referring questions to SOUTHCOM. But in a reply to the X post on Monday, Hegseth’s deputy press secretary Joel Valdez signaled his approval with emojis of a salute and the American flag. In a statement to the Intercept, SOUTHCOM spokesperson Steven McLoud denied that the post implied any religious or far-right message.
“The graphic you’re referring to was an illustration of service members in a ready posture during Operation SOUTHERN SPEAR,” McLoud told The Intercept. “There is no other communication intent for this image.”
The original image of the masked service member appears to have come from an album published online by the Pentagon that depicts a training exercise by Marines aboard the USS Iwo Jima in the Caribbean Sea in October. The photo depicting the cross, however, was removed from the album after commentators on social media pointed out its origins.
Amanda Saunders, a spokesperson for the Defense Visual Information Distribution Service, the Pentagon-run photo agency, said she was unable to comment directly but forwarded the request to the Marine unit involved in the exercise.
“Content on DVIDS is published and archived directly by the registered units,” she said, “so we don’t have control over what is posted or removed, nor are we able to comment on those decisions.”
Hegseth and the Cross
The Jerusalem cross’s popularity on the right has surged in part thanks to featuring in various media, including the 2005 Ridley Scott film “Kingdom of Heaven” and video games, according to Matthew Gabriele, a professor of medieval studies at Virginia Tech and a scholar of Crusader iconography.“It supports the rhetoric of ‘defense of homeland.’”“It supports the rhetoric of ‘defense of homeland,’” Gabriele told The Intercept, “because the crusaders, in the right’s understanding, were waging a defensive war against enemies trying to invade Christian lands.”
The symbol’s position of prominence in official military communications is just the latest example of a trollish extremism by the Trump administration’s press teams, which have made a point of reveling in the cruelty wrought on its perceived enemies at home and abroad, or “owning the libs.”
[
Related
Team Leader at Gaza Aid Distribution Sites Belongs to Anti-“Jihad” Motorcycle Club, Has Crusader Tattoos](theintercept.com/2025/08/06/ga…)
Monday’s post may also be intended as Hegseth putting his thumb in the eye of the Pentagon’s old guard. Hegseth’s embrace of the symbol — in the form of a gawdy chest tattoo — once stymied, however temporarily, his ambitions in the military.Folling the January 6 insurrection, according to Hegseth and reporting by the Washington Post, Hegseth was ordered to stand down rather than deploy with his National Guard unit ahead of the 2021 inauguration of Joe Biden. The decision to treat Hegseth as a possible “insider threat” came after a someone flagged a photo of a shirtless Hegseth to military brass, according to the Washington Post.
“I joined the Army in 2001 because I wanted to serve my country. Extremists attacked us on 9/11, and we went to war,” Hegseth wrote “The War on Warriors,” his 2024 memoir. “Twenty years later, I was deemed an ‘extremist’ by that very same Army.”
Hegseth was hardly chastened by the episode and has since gotten more tattoos with more overt anti-Muslim resonance, including the Arabic word word for “infidel,” which appeared on his bicep sometime in the past several years. It’s accompanied by another bicep tattoo of the Latin words “Deus vult,” or “God wills it,” yet another slogan associated with the Crusades and repurposed by extremist groups.
The use of the image to advertise aggressive posturing in a majority-Christian region like Latin America may seem odd at first glance. In the context of renewed U.S. focus on Latin America, however, it’s a potent symbol of the move of military action from the Middle East to the Western Hemisphere.
“They’re globalizing the Monroe Doctrine.”The post comes on the heels of the release of the Trump’s National Security Strategy, a 33-page document outlining the administration’s foreign-policy priorities that explicitly compared Trump’s stance to the Monroe Doctrine, the turn-of-the-century policy of U.S. dominance in Latin America in opposition to colonialism by other foreign powers. Grandin, the Yale historian, described the document as a “vision of global dominance” based on a model of great-powers competition that can lead to immense instability.
“They’re globalizing the Monroe Doctrine,” Grandin said. “I’m no fan of the hypocrisy and arrogance of the old liberal international order, but there’s something to be said for starting from a first principle of shared interests, which does keep great conflict at bay to some degree.”
The post Official Propaganda for Caribbean Military Buildup Includes “Crusader Cross” appeared first on The Intercept.
From The Intercept via This RSS Feed.
Pete Hegseth’s Arabic tattoo stirs controversy: ‘clear symbol of Islamophobia’
Critics say US defense secretary’s tattoo of the word kafir, meaning ‘infidel’ or ‘non-believer’ could offend MuslimsMarina Dunbar (The Guardian)
Do you know why?
Would it be able to federate with other instances that use I2P?
It may be possible to federate with other i2p instances, if not, I'm guessing it would require fairly simple code changes to lemmy to be able to point to other .i2p addresses.
To federate with clearnet, I think an instance would need to kind of act like a bridge that uses both clearnet and i2p; so it wouldn't be "hidden." I see there is also an exit node network (ran by StormyCloud) on i2p now, but that may be too slow for federation.
Edit: I imagine most clearnet instances would not want to federate with a darknet instance due to the higher probability of illegal content being posted.
Federation would be pretty bad.
Would be a lot easier to build a JavaScript free reddit
Redlib is an alternate frontend to reddit.com.
I can't find "Ramble" so I'm guessing they might mean Raddle, which is a reddit-like website of its own, similar to Lemmy (without federation)
Tesla Optimus falls in Miami demo, hand movements sparks remote operation debate
Tesla Optimus's fall in Miami demo sparks remote operation debate
While falls are not unusual in robotics development, a specific hand motion has raised questions about the current level of autonomy in Tesla’s system.Jijo Malayil (Interesting Engineering)
LifeInMultipleChoice
in reply to LifeInMultipleChoice • • •FauxLiving
in reply to LifeInMultipleChoice • • •Amcrest cameras have a RTSP stream open by default. If you know the camera’s IP address you can just open the stream in a media player, like VLC, and set it to save the stream to disk.
Also, you could probably save the stream without viewing using ffmpeg.
LifeInMultipleChoice
in reply to LifeInMultipleChoice • • •MentalEdge
in reply to LifeInMultipleChoice • • •FauxLiving
in reply to MentalEdge • • •wildflower
in reply to LifeInMultipleChoice • • •anamethatisnt
in reply to LifeInMultipleChoice • • •The simplest solution would be to block the cameras internet access in your router/firewall and live stream through a browser while recording detected motion to an SD Card.
Link to the camera:
amcrest.com/qcam-ip2m822e-2mp-…
2910000
in reply to LifeInMultipleChoice • • •br3d
in reply to 2910000 • • •LifeInMultipleChoice
in reply to 2910000 • • •just_another_person
in reply to LifeInMultipleChoice • • •Probably going to be Frigate. It's meant for NVR, and has easy time management tools for review, plus you can setup an easy monitor stream with RTSP or ON IF to watch live from elsewhere.
You could also engage it's inference for doing simple identification or animals and objects to tag clips where something happens in a Region of Interest.