Salta al contenuto principale


Am I the only one left in the world who still believes that the Dark Ages were dark?? It seems everything I read now asserts how the medieval era was "so...much...more!" They go on to describe the case, and if I had to choose a metaphor it would be coming out of a fine French restaurant fed to satiety and being accosted, hey, this rotten raw carrot, it's not nothing! No. It's not nothing. But it's not much, either.

I think it's all a scam because they ran out of subjects for doctoral theses.

in reply to Tarnport

it all depends on how you determine โ€œDarkโ€ - I always understood it to mean that there was a lot that we didnโ€™t know about the period, it was dark in limited knowledge
in reply to Cycling Stu

@stufromoz I can see it that way and I think that's always been partly true, but I think it's also and maybe more dominantly that the light of civilization had gone out. In either case it's currently a deeply unfashionable term and I'm for bringing it back.
in reply to Tarnport

@Tarnport @Cycling Stu

Roman empire was a war machine, they had slavery everywhere, they liked going to the Colosseum to see people killing each other or being eaten by lions, not much about being civilized ๐Ÿ˜

I'm in the team "middle age was not darker than many other human periods".

reshared this

in reply to Max - Poliverso ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

@max @stufromoz well yes that would bring us to the question of what progress even is. Valid points.

I may just like to have clean water and some imported spices and more leisure fun.

in reply to Tarnport

@Tarnport

As I probably wrote you some time ago, in Italy we've got a very well known historian, Alessandro Barbero, who's strongly fighting the idea that middle age was somehow "dark".

Funny enough, the only middle age historian I have among my friends told me the same thing 30 years ago, when we met the first time.

Anyway, if you want to go a bit deeper into this topic this is one of the many contributions by A. Barbero.

youtu.be/m8zhSAg04Zg?si=PTMc94โ€ฆ

Tarnport reshared this.

in reply to Max - Poliverso ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

@max this is in fact the very thing I am watching right this minute that caused me to make the post!!! Also Alberto Angela. It's part of my homework for Italian to keep me interested in the grammar because I like the subject matter, but now I'm hoarse from yelling at the screen...
in reply to Tarnport

@Tarnport

Sorry, my English is far worse than your Italian, I can't understand if you're in the team "middle age was dark" or in the team "middle age wasn't dark" ๐Ÿ˜

in reply to Max - Poliverso ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

@max I'm so sorry. My Italian is far worse, I assure you, and I won't even try to speak it here (but would love if you spoke Italian to me here!). I hope you have an automatic translator. I still think that the Dark Ages were (mostly, protractedly) dark and dead, and find the arguments presented to the contrary a bit flimsy and strained. Still I enjoy the topic, and this should be about vocabulary and grammar for me, not academic criticism.
in reply to Tarnport

@Tarnport

Conosco l'inglese abbastanza bene (almeno la parte scritta mentre sul parlato no, lรฌ non me la cavo per niente bene), non ti preoccupare, era solo per dire che non mi era chiara la tua posizione.

in reply to Tarnport

The question for me is which paradigm I'd want to live under. I'm basically with you, but I think it has been oversold how dead and "dark" that period was.

It does read to me like the rule of law, among other things, was a lot more arbitrary and the corruption was enshrined, so to speak.

The thing that I chafe it is all of these people in the here and now wanting to reach back to that period and DIY everything. Trade existed, but it was far more limited. 1/

Tarnport reshared this.

in reply to Deb Nam-Krane

@Deb Nam-Krane @Tarnport

Trade was geographically limited, probably (I'm not so good at history), but I can remember banks were invented in the middle age the same for checks and bills of exchange.

In the middle age the rule of law wasn't arbitrary it was just unbalanced, on the side of nobilty privileges. However, rules were written and there were courts where you could ask for your rights to be respected (if you were so high in the hierarchy to have rights).

Is this a step back with regards to what there was before the "dark age"? Well... roman empire had slavery, if a slave killed his master the family had the right to kill ALL his slaves (men, women and children). At the end of Spartacus's revolt 6000 prisoner's were crucified on the road between Capua (the city were the revolt begun) and Rome.

Saying that civilization went down in the middle age (that's the reason behind being considered a dark age) is risky...

Tarnport reshared this.

in reply to Max - Poliverso ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

@max @dnkboston I've always been given to believe that the term "Dark Ages" refers only to the first half or so of the middle ages: In Britain I assume that would be the period after the Romans left, up until maybe the Norman Conquest or some time around then. So when we think about enormous stone castles and shiny plate armour, that's all late medieval. But the viking invasion, Bede, Cuthbert, Oswald; they were all in the Dark Ages. Please correct me, I'm no historian!

Tarnport reshared this.

in reply to Ken Milmore

@Ken Milmore @Deb Nam-Krane @Tarnport

Well... actually the shiny plate armour arrived late in the middle age, close to the end.

Armours must be resistant and light (well... as light as an iron suit can be ๐Ÿ˜). They need technical skills and tools that took time to discover and master.

At the beginning they just used thick leather covers, then moved to chain mail and only at the end they could build armours.

EDIT: Sorry... I read again your post and maybe you were saying exactly the same thing. But I'm not 100% sure so I'll leave my post.

in reply to Ken Milmore

hi I just want to chime in that castles as we often think of them really only lasted about 150 years properly speaking. That factoid always amazes me. (When I started the discussion I was making light of the term Dark Ages and I do think you are right to distinguish early, high and late Middle Ages)
Questa voce รจ stata modificata (2 ore fa)
in reply to Tarnport

@kbm0 @max @dnkboston

english-heritage.org.uk/castleโ€ฆ

Everything on the internet is so polluted with AI now but this is a pretty trustworthy and brief, if localized, source, going through the evolution of defensive castles from Bailey & Mott til the end of castlebuilding per se, when they diverged into luxury residences and military forts.

in reply to Ken Milmore

@kbm0 I think it's safe to say that "Dark Ages" has always been more of a vibe than a hard narrative, and it works best in contrast with "The Enlightenment". @max @Tarnport

Tarnport reshared this.

in reply to Max - Poliverso ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

@Tarnport @Deb Nam-Krane

I've just found this about trades in middle age which is somehow amusing.

You know about Dante and you probably also know he fell in love with Beatrice Portinari (whose father was a banker).

That girl got married to Simone De' Bardi who was a member of one of the richest family in Florence. They ran a trade company with branches all over Europe, in Africa and Asia too.

We're here around 1300 (not sure the exact week ๐Ÿ˜) but that company was probably founded some time before. This also adds to the idea that trades were quite developed in the middle age too.

in reply to Max - Poliverso ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

@max

I don't think you read my whole thread.
People were much more self-sufficient under the manorial system during the Middle Ages out of necessity. Yes, there was trade, but nearly as robust as under the Romans.

I wouldn't build the Roman Empire in a lab as my ideal setting, but if I had to choose between the two, I would live there over Medieval Italy. Freedom of travel was much more limited in most settings, and more people would have had "rights" to me, even if not a slave.

@Tarnport

Tarnport reshared this.

in reply to Deb Nam-Krane

And I think there's something to be said for more fluid interchanges with other areas.

BUT there was more intellectual dynamism than the period is given credit for, and--forgive me if I'm repeating myself--their conception of the world as more limited did not mean it was less sophisticated. If you can bear to read me fangirl it up, here's an interview I did with the author of *Galileo's Muse* that talks about that writtenbydeb.blogspot.com/2013โ€ฆ

2/

in reply to Deb Nam-Krane

The TL;DR is that the fact that they saw their world as limited meant that they were, in some way, freer to think through the complications of time and space. They weren't teaching math and science per se, but a lot of it was knit into their arts and, in a fashion, available for many.

3/3

in reply to Deb Nam-Krane

@dnkboston oh I will read it! and I appreciate all the conversation that has erupted under this toot. I will open it up and debride as quickly as I have time this afternoon. Thank you
in reply to Tarnport

There was another post a few months ago that started an explosion of comments from all over the Mastodon universe, and it was just as nerdy. That's why I love this place ๐Ÿ˜„

Thanks for saying you'll read the interview! And even if you don't, I highly recommend the book he wrote.

Tarnport reshared this.

in reply to Deb Nam-Krane

@dnkboston omg I got to the end of the article before I realized the interviewer was YOU!!!

Yayyyyyy! I forwarded 8 times. Thank you for sharing. So very well done and written.

in reply to Tarnport

๐Ÿ˜ Aw, thanks! When I can lean into my inner-nerd (as opposed to my outer dork), I have so much fun. And he was so gracious ๐Ÿ˜„

Tarnport reshared this.

in reply to Deb Nam-Krane

@dnkboston it's a very good article in all ways. Brava. Can't wait to hear what my sib thinks. It's spot-on their bailiwick
in reply to Tarnport

Thank you๐Ÿ˜Š Can't wait to hear what your sibling thinks.
in reply to Tarnport

That framing has been really trendy the past 20 yrs or so, but more historians nowadays are advocating the traditional "decline and fall" narrative.

Tarnport reshared this.

in reply to Tarnport

The Dark Ages of the Christian revolt against knowledge and wisdom were very dark in the remnants of the Roman empire and just a bit shady in others but quite bright in some places few like to acknowledge.
in reply to Tarnport

Sensitive content

โ‡ง