Have you ever felt that European policy-making exists in a bubble? It seems far removed from your daily life. You scroll through news about new digital laws. The technical jargon makes you feel overwhelmed and clueless. At times, you tend to ask yourself: “This affects me, but what can I do?”

You’re not alone. For too long, people have seen digital policies change their online lives. Many feel powerless over decisions made in Brussels. But there’s hope. A tool is gaining strength. It’s called collective redress, and it could give us the power to push back against Big Tech.

The Digital Fairness Act is a Concern for Individual Privacy

Let’s talk about the elephant in the room: the Digital Fairness Act. On paper, this legislation sounds promising. Who could argue against “fairness” in the digital space? Some elements, such as the focus on banning design techniques that trick users, are a great step forward. This restriction is aimed at preventing coercion of users, turning them into active users of their own experience.

But if you scratch the surface, you’ll find policies that should make any privacy-conscious citizen concerned.

The Act has concerning elements that could harm user autonomy and digital rights. For instance, it may introduce rules on dark patterns, addictive design, and minors’ protection that the GDPR, DSA, DMA, and existing Consumer Directives already cover. This legislation impacts individual freedoms by adding regulations that may enable excessive surveillance. The unclear definition of “harmful content” could also be used for censorship, tracking whistleblowers, and political opponents.

For the Pirate Party and digital rights advocates in Europe, this is concerning. We have fought hard for privacy and digital freedoms. It’s alarming to see them erode under “fairness” and “safety.” Policies should focus on enforcing and simplifying existing laws. We shouldn’t create new ones that could weaken end-to-end encryption and other privacy settings.

What can we do? This is where collective redress comes in. It changes how European citizens confront corporate wrongs and deal with digital policies.

Collective redress in the EU began with a 2013 European Commission recommendation. It gained strength with the Representative Actions Directive, which took effect in 2020. Member states had to implement it by December 2022. This idea was inspired by the American class action system. In these lawsuits, many individuals can unite to challenge powerful corporations and harmful legislation.

The EU version has its own approach. Unlike the American model, where lawyers often lead cases for large fees, the European approach focuses on qualified groups. These include consumer protection organizations, NGOs, and advocacy groups that represent affected citizens.

How Does Collective Redress Work?

Collective redress is powerful. There is no need to be a legal expert or a lobbyist to join in. When a qualified group spots a violation of consumer rights or EU law affecting many people, they can start a representative action. This allows one lawsuit to tackle the issues faced by hundreds, thousands, or even millions of people.

There are two main types:

• injunctive relief (stopping harmful practices);
• compensatory relief (seeking damages for harm).

Member states can implement these flexibly.

The core principle stays the same: bringing individual claims together into a strong collective voice.

While the process may begin with a qualified group collecting evidence of widespread harm, this is not a necessary condition; action may also be grounded in generalized or abstract adverse effects, in line with the precautionary principle. Then, a court action can be filed on behalf of all affected parties. Importantly, under the EU model, individuals don’t need to opt in right from the start. Instead, they are represented automatically. However, they can choose to opt out if they wish. This system is crucial. It stops companies from avoiding accountability just because many people are too busy or intimidated to join a lawsuit.

Collective Redress Meets Digital Rights

Now, let’s connect the dots. How does collective redress help us challenge the problematic elements of the Digital Fairness Act? There are three main aspects.

• Accountability: When platforms use surveillance or data collection required by the Act, qualified digital rights groups can challenge these actions. They can act if these actions violate key rights under GDPR, the Charter of Fundamental Rights, or other EU laws. One lawsuit might represent millions of users whose privacy has been harmed.
• Power dynamics change: Big Tech and governments depend on citizens feeling too overwhelmed to respond. Now, they face organized and well-funded opposition. Digital rights NGOs can use collective redress to challenge both the platforms and the use of problematic legal provisions.
• Precedence-setting: A successful collective redress action under the Digital Fairness Act would create legal standards. This makes it tougher for other platforms to use similar measures. It also shows lawmakers that some rules can’t be enforced without violating basic rights.

The mix of collective redress mechanisms and the flawed Digital Fairness Act offers a unique chance. We are not just powerless individuals against big corporations and bureaucracy. We are a united group: organized, legally strong, and ready to protect our digital rights.

The European Pirates stand ready to support and coordinate these efforts. Because in the digital age, our privacy and our freedoms shouldn’t be decided without us.

This piece was originally written by: Hugo Dabas (www.echoesunwritten.com)

europeanpirates.eu/collective-…