Salta al contenuto principale


President Joe Biden’s Threads account @potus is federating on the Fediverse!

And I’m following him from atomicpoet.org!

Wow! This is as monumental as Barack Obama joining Twitter! A truly historic day for the #Fediverse!

@fediversenews

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to Chris Trottier

I would prefer that @potus run his own Fediverse server but this is materially better than him not being on the Fediverse at all.

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to Chris Trottier

And by joining #Threads, @potus has pretty much forced the hand of the Fediverse to federate with Threads.

In the USA, if the Fediverse is going to be used for political organization, you need to receive and boost messages from @potus.

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to Chris Trottier

Mindboggling, given that this is already being worked on:

https://stefanbohacek.online/@stefan/111978315030059050

reshared this

in reply to Stefan Bohacek

@stefan That's gonna have to be a beefy server given the large number of gov officials and the number of followers and interactions they get.
in reply to Olivier Forget

@teleclimber I'll be happy for my taxes to go towards that!

reshared this

in reply to Stefan Bohacek

I mean in reality

* Campaigns / officials have used multiple services in the past to reach the widest possible audience.
* Likely, those involved with the POTUS arriving on threads know little about the difference between mastodon and Threads and how (and if) they communicate.
* The core problem of validating government officials identities is not solved by threads since you cannot bring a domain to threads.

So really this kinda seems like a big ol' Nothing Burger, unless you're a threads user ​:cirno_shrug:​ Even saying 'the fediverse is FORCED' is hyperbolic. His ass wasn't here before, and huge swaths of the fediverse aren't American.

reshared this

in reply to Null

Seeing how the EU and the German government run a Fediverse server, I think it’s highly likely that the U.S. government also knows about the Fediverse. Especially since you must manually turn on federation right now in order to federate from Threads.

The bigger question is why the U.S. government decided to join Threads instead of run their own Fediverse server.

And while I acknowledge the U.S. is not the world—I’m Canadian—the U.S. remains an economic and cultural power, and it is unavoidable.

Questa voce è stata modificata (3 settimane fa)
in reply to Chris Trottier

@NullNowhere @stefan

> The bigger question is why the U.S. government decided to join Threads instead of run their own Fediverse server.

User count.

in reply to Artemesia

@artemesia @NullNowhere @stefan When it comes to the Fediverse, the user count of a particular server is irrelevant.
in reply to Artemesia

@artemesia @NullNowhere @stefan I’m on a server with a total of three users. In terms of network effect, there’s no tangible difference between atomicpoet.org and mastodon.social.
in reply to Stefan Bohacek

@stefan We have that yet. See the historical post when the government declares marijuana as legalized*.
➡️ https://social.bund.de/@Bundesregierung/112139495304415295

*) feat. a bit of bureaucratic limitations

in reply to Chris Trottier

if Biden wins then yay but if that handle is a Trump handle nope nope nope. I’ll buy or run my own node and defederate everything and anyone connected to his lying Putin loving ass

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to https://gigatexal.blog -he/him

Then you might as well leave the Fediverse entirely.

You can definitely block Threads, but it’s near impossible to block all servers that don’t block Threads.

Questa voce è stata modificata (3 settimane fa)
in reply to Chris Trottier

@potus That is odd logic. Meta has proved itself time and time again to be an incorrigible threat to democracy and just basic human decency, but, hey, the guy shipping arms to Netanyahu is joining so you should, too!

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to Chris Trottier

I have no intention of following him on Threads. There are direct ways to communicate with politicians. This is peculiar logic you have used here.

reshared this

in reply to LAUREN

@noondlyt No one’s forcing you to follow Threads but the illusion that the majority of the Fediverse will de-federate Threads is over. That’s simply not realistic anymore.

I don’t make the conditions. I just report them.

in reply to Chris Trottier

This is essentially the nail in the coffin for the Fediverse. Nothing to rejoice at all.
https://sociale.network/@oblomov/112203725365230339


this is an excellent example of how to do things wrong. The White House has the resources to set up its own Fediverse nodes. That it doesn't and instead endorses a proprietary platform is borderline criminal.

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to Chris Trottier

yeah, no. America is not the world, I would rather defederate from the whole US than federate with threads. And I don't want that genocide supporting douchebag on this service anyway, the politicians can stay out.

reshared this

in reply to Lillian Violet

@GLaDTheresCake The politicians are already here and have been here for awhile. For example, the EU already has its own official server.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Not directly, people can make bots that do it, the way there are bots that will rebroadcast certain people’s Twitter posts. You can basically have a DMZ for it and let the rest of us defederate from Threads.

It’s not like the POTUS account is going to reply to us if we comment on it anyway!

in reply to Chris Trottier

@potus Not to be an ass, but have you done a temperature check of how many people on the fediverse: 1) don’t care about US politics, 2) if they do care, don’t care for the President, or following politicos in general?

My point is, not sure if anyone has a “forced hand” to federate w/ Threads.

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to knova

@knova The people who use the Fediverse now are not representative of the people who will use the Fediverse in the future.

And like it or not, nobody controls ActivityPub.

in reply to Chris Trottier

I don't disagree with either of those points, but I don't think they touch on what I stated either.

Even if a million new instances are spun up that all federate w/ Threads, there will be an island of connected instances that route around it (ie. block it).

Personally I don't think we should be championing Meta doing anything, but again, I agree with your point re: nobody controlling ActivityPub.

in reply to knova

@knova I’m not rooting for Meta. If I were, I’d have a Threads account. And I likewise am not happy that @potus is not using a government-owned Fediverse server.

But at the same time, this is tangibly better than @potus being on Threads and not federating or staying on X where his posts are not publicly available.

Nevertheless, @potus will motivate more people to join the Fediverse – even if the means by which he does this is not ideal.

in reply to Chris Trottier

> @potus has pretty much forced the hand of the Fediverse to federate with Threads.

Nonsense. I'm perfectly capable of receiving the president's messaging via other means, of which there are hundreds.

The threads.net domain will remain blocked by my account. I want nothing to do with a company that sold out its userbase to russia to influence the 2016 election.

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to Artemesia

@artemesia Sure, you don’t have to follow @potus and you can block Threads. But the bulk of the Fediverse is federating with Threads and will likely continue to federate with it.
in reply to Artemesia

@artemesia Sure, you don’t have to follow @potus and you can block Threads. But the bulk of the Fediverse is federating with Threads and will likely continue to federate with it.

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to Chris Trottier

No he hasn't forced the hand of any Fediverse servers.

reshared this

in reply to JohnW

@the_Effekt You’re on a server that federates with Threads. The likelihood that universeodon.com stops federating with Threads has drastically diminished.

Like it or not, this changes everything.

in reply to Chris Trottier

Have to disagree with you there. Even though universeodon.com changed hands, it was unlikely they would defederate anyway. I personally am neither for nor against my admin's decisions. If I don't like it I can move.

universeodon was taken over by mastodonapp.uk (non US) anyway.

I don't believe that one noteworthy person who per government policy can only post generalities on social media can drastically change anything.

in reply to JohnW

@the_Effekt I’ve long learned that social media is only as strong as its network effect, and that influential people are key to building a stronger network effect. Most people only join services if they perceive them as popular. However, to be popular, someone of consequence must be there first.

@potus is the most influential person on the planet.

in reply to Chris Trottier

Remember we're talking about the Fediverse here. There are a lot more people of my ilk who value discussions with friends, deep dives into news snippets, and art over occasional non-committal comments by famous people.

Not to mention Threads is still (at this point) a partially disconnected entity that builds overlay protocols to keep it's commercial interests as a priority over true federation.

Potus would never even see our replies, and this could go on for months or years.

in reply to JohnW

@the_Effekt To me, it’s not about famous people. It’s about building a large network effect.

I don’t care for the Fediverse if it becomes a small social bubble of mostly tech nerds.

in reply to Chris Trottier

Well, good luck with that.

The Fediverse grows organically. It has a more solid foundation than other platforms seeking eyeballs for eyeballs sake.

There might be a lot of techies here, but my feed is packed with great variety. It's more interesting than any other social media. Anyone else can do the same because they can choose for themselves.

in reply to JohnW

@the_Effekt This isn’t about eyeballs for eyeballs sake. It’s about building the practicality of the technology.

Email is only good because everyone has email. A phone is only good because everyone has a phone.

Once we get to the point where it’s assumed everyone is on the Fediverse, then my server here becomes that much more useful.

in reply to Chris Trottier

The nerd network argument was no longer valid 5 years ago.
Boden's account on threads is more likely to result in more people creating an account on threads than on any real Fediverse service. The network effect is there, just in the wrong direction.
Biden is strengthening Meta rather than the Fediverse

What the federation from Fediverse to threads will look like is not yet foreseeable. And I dare to doubt that even a fraction of threads users will even activate the federation to the Fediverse

@the_Effekt@universeodon.com@potus@threads.net

in reply to crossgolf_rebel 🤍 on Calckey :calckey:

@crossgolf_rebel @the_Effekt Frankly, just having @potus here makes the Fediverse that much more usable than it was yesterday—even if federation is in one direction for the moment. And I really do mean that.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Doesn't the @POTUS account get passed on to each successive US President? What happens if the orange monster wins. Definitely not wanted on Fedi, I'd imagine.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I would love to follow @potus, but I'm blocking the Threads domain. It's not worth allowing my, or other people's, data to be mined by Meta and sold to third parties without our consent, often without our knowledge. I sincerely hope the account will explore the benefits of running an account in the fediverse that isn't tied in through Zuckerberg's malignant social network.

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to Cotopaxi

@Cotopaxi Blocking Threads doesn’t prevent Meta from collecting data about you. And by broadcasting your posts publicly, you’ve implied consent that they be archived beyond mstdn.social because that’s what federation is.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Thank you. Would you please help me understand this better, if you have time?
in reply to Cotopaxi

@Cotopaxi To put things simply, when you post something, a copy of your posts gets duplicated on every server that federates with your own.

I have copies of your posts on atomicpoet.org. You even have a profile here.

Now mstdn.social federates with 10,000s of servers. This means your posts are duplicated that many times.

in reply to Chris Trottier

@Cotopaxi Now the reason blocking threads doesn’t prevent Meta from collecting your data is because you’re also broadcasting your posts through RSS too, and that’s public.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Thank you. I'm aware my posts are public. But I read a post (now cannot locate it) that said, assuming I understood this correctly and simplifying what it said, that the Threads domain link to the fediverse gave it the potential to scrape account data that isn't publicly posted. I would appreciate knowledgeable input on this concern. I should have been clearer about this, apologies.
in reply to Cotopaxi

Also, while my posts in the fediverse are public, I'm under the impression that the fediverse, outside threads domain, doesn't collect and sell user data from public posts to third parties. I would appreciate being corrected if this is not true. The Threads domain, I have read, will collect data from public posts in the fediverse and may aggregate it for sale to third parties, but blocking the Threads domain is supposed to prevent this. Again, please do correct me if wrong.
in reply to Cotopaxi

@Cotopaxi You can’t say that the Fediverse doesn’t collect data and aggregate it for sale to third parties because the Fediverse is not one singular entity.

Anyone can take your public posts and sell it if they wish. Blocking Threads does not prevent this.

in reply to Chris Trottier

dang. Guess the dems picked a side in the conflict and it wasnt mine.
in reply to Chris Trottier

thanks for the heads up. I just followed. Really happy about this
in reply to Chris Trottier

Joe Biden is guilty of facilitating genocide, and he shouldn't be welcomed anywhere.

Not only the US used it's veto power in the UN SC 4 times (if memory doesn't fail me), the US government just approved a billion dollars arms shipment to Israel (who is plausibly committing genocide according to the ICJ AND disregarding the las UN SC resolution calling for a cease fire).

No sympathy for genocide nor for the people that fund it.

in reply to Chris Trottier

There goes the neighbourhood.

Hope Fedi doesn't go downhill as quickly as Twitter did after Obama joined.

in reply to Chris Trottier

@potus@threads.net how is the current state of threads.net federation the EXACT same thing as the twitter relays and other services that already exist? Publish only is not federation.

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to dracoling

@dracoling Twitter has killed API access. And Threads’ federation won’t be one way forever.

Whatever the case, it’s nice to receive posts from @potus.

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to Chris Trottier

you might know this Chris - does Pleroma have a problem with Threads federation? I cannot find or follow a single threads.net account from M-m-m-myPleroma personal instance
in reply to TheJen - Jen Wojcik

@TheJen You would think that the U.S. government would run their own Fediverse server. But it is what it is.

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to Chris Trottier

@TheJen i think someone said at some point that it'd take a miracle for the us government to set up a fediverse server because of bureaucracy things
in reply to Rairii

@Rairii @TheJen The EU have their own #fediverse server and are having no problems: https://social.network.europa.eu
in reply to Chris Trottier

@TheJen
They're working on it. They are also building out an online repository for federal reports/journals /scientific info.
in reply to TheJen - Jen Wojcik

@TheJen
Not the normal Library of Congress material. It's the stuff they were putting into commercial repositories for academic papers. They seem to be going by dept/area, so you can find some locally already, but not all. I don't know if the new repository is considered part of the Library of Congress.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I was able to connect to @potus@threads.net via the Vivaldi Mastodon instance.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Doesn’t work for me - the link opens a new browser tab, searching for the link returns no results. Is this federation on request, where every instance needs to ask to federate?
in reply to js

@js Try searching for his full address. If that doesn’t pull up any results, you may want to look into whether your server is federating with Threads.
@js

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to Chris Trottier

That doesn’t work either and my server is set up to federate with everyone.
in reply to js

@js I just @'ed you in a DM reply from a potus toot. That *might* help your server fetch that account 🤞
@js
in reply to shellsharks

@shellsharks Nope, doesn’t work. I guess they screwed up the protocol and it only works with Mastodon.
in reply to js

@js @shellsharks Just like you, I’m on Akkoma. It works for me.

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to Chris Trottier

wait for the shitstorm when boosting POTUS posts because they don't have CW: uspol
in reply to Chris Trottier

WAKE UP another 87 year old corrupt politican joined the fediverse. its not like he just joined threads and will almost never acess any part of the fediverse. How amazing is that!!!
in reply to Chris Trottier

The problem? He can’t see our responses to a post - still! It’s not federating. It’s cross-posting.
in reply to (((Jann Gobble)))🏳️‍🌈

@jann He can see our likes and boosts which are responses. As far as comments, he can’t see them yet.

Threads is still beta testing ActivityPub.

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to Maggieci democracy enjoyer

@MaggieCi Why are they on X or Facebook? They want to be where the people are.

Of course, a government-run Mastodon server could federate into Threads, but that’s a whole other story (and expense).

Unknown parent

js
@m @shellsharks Interesting. Updating did indeed help!
in reply to Chris Trottier

#GenocideJoe is coming to Mastodon. Put on your PPE and the kids so he doesn't get them.
in reply to Chris Trottier

fabulous, I can liberate myself from @potus@bird.makeup

... which makes me think: @vincent I wonder if you could inject 'now verified in fediverse at...' posts? 🤔

in reply to Chris Trottier

i guess Bluesky is going to federate as well, unless they see it as a competition and lobbied to move the account tontheir platform.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Where is it independently verified that this is an official direct account?
in reply to Chris Trottier

My instance doesn't federate with the genocide enabliers, so this is what I see if I click on the @potus links everyone is putting in this thread. Much more wholesome.
@fediversenews
in reply to gme :heart_pride: :heart_trans: :verified_gay:

@gme

@fediversenews @atomicpoet @potus

Accounts like @potus are gonna be used as a one way broadcast layer no matter what service they are on. It's pretty much just for announcements and statements, not direct interaction with people.

Which, when we are talking any political office might be best.

in reply to C.W. Smith

1) Do our politicians need a larger bully pulpit than what they already have?
2) Kind of defeats the entire "social" purpose of "social media" then doesn't it?
in reply to gme :heart_pride: :heart_trans: :verified_gay:

@gme
Have you ever known a Politicians X, Meta, or whatever account to answer commentors like us?

It's post the statement, get it out there, set and forget.

I don't remember any account talking back and not causing the politico more problems.

in reply to C.W. Smith

Nice deflection.

I don't remember any account talking back and not causing the politico more problems.


If a politician isn't willing to engage with their constituents, do they really deserve my vote?

in reply to gme :heart_pride: :heart_trans: :verified_gay:

@gme @CWSmith It’s ultimately not up to you to decide who is or is not worth following on the Fediverse.

Maybe your admin can make that decision for you, but they certainly don’t make that decision for me.

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to C.W. Smith

Fine. Then how about answering my questions?

1) Do our politicians need a larger bully pulpit than what they already have?
2) Kind of defeats the entire "social" purpose of "social media" then doesn't it?
in reply to gme :heart_pride: :heart_trans: :verified_gay:

@gme
Do you need it? Our politicians take every opportunity they can to push out whatever their message is at any time. If anything we need them to do it so we can at least know what they are saying and keep track.

And it doesn't defeat the social part of social media. Making a statement and letting the masses discuss is just as socially valid as answering every post.

in reply to C.W. Smith

Maybe if Biden was forced to hear from his constituents he might learn that his policies towards Israel are woefully unpopular. Instead he's insulated himself and only hears from his sycophants.

At least Obama got out there and talked to the people. Before this campaign season started when was the last time Biden actually sat down and met with his constituents?

If I want to just hear what the White House says there are a multitude of avenues to be spoon fed the spin.

My point is it's not really that great that @potus@threads.net is here. Not when Threads is only broadcasting Threads users to the Fediverse and not taking any of the replies. (And I'm a staunch supporter for Threads being on the fediverse!)

But another broadcast channel is the absolute last thing we need.

in reply to gme :heart_pride: :heart_trans: :verified_gay:

@gme
The one directional nature of the Threads Federation right now is just out of everyone on Threads hands. That's gonna be on Meta to eventually address and put up. Otherwise there is no benifit for a Threads user to hit that Fediverse switch. Why would they care what people they can't see think or how many follow them if they can't even follow back?
in reply to C.W. Smith

@C.W. Smith that's the case with pretty much every political/important person account that I know of (and on everything social media). They only keep their account for posting and not much else. Following them is like using a glorified feed reader.

@Chris Trottier @gme :heart_pride: :heart_trans: :verified_gay: @President Joe Biden