What should the subset of the Fediverse that is Lemmy + Mbin + PieFed be called?
Context: I made a poll on PieFed about the new post flairs (so if you are one of the few hundred people who have a PieFed account, follow that link and answer there). Unfortunately Lemmy has neither polls nor post flairs, so this post is to open up the discussion to the wider Fediverse, or rather the subset of it that encompasses Lemmy + Mbin + PieFed, which is called... what exactly?
Is Threadiverse too traumatic & tainted by association with Meta's (all but entirely defunct) Threads? Is The Verse too cool/poetic/nerdy (but niche) to be understood? I highly advise against Lemmyverse bc mainstream normal people are far less tolerant of tankies than we who are here are willing to put up with. Simply listing the software available sometimes is the best option - like the Interstellar app supports all of Lemmy + Mbin + PieFed, but most support at best 1 or 2 of those - but usually is too long to say and does not roll off the tongue, plus will just keep growing as time goes on. Is Forumverse thus the least bad of the available options, or perhaps you have a better idea? 💡
Anyway, the start to a listing:
1) Threadiverse
2) Forumverse
3) (The) Verse
4) Lemmy + Mbin + PieFed
5) Something else?
Serenity Firefly Quote Painting by Michelle Eshleman
Serenity Firefly Quote Painting Painting by Michelle EshlemanPixels
like this
reshared this
macfranc
in reply to OpenStars • • •In the past we had gotten into the habit of calling the set of thread-based environments #threadverse, but the advent of the terrible Meta service has polluted this denomination.
Personally I would use the expression #topicverse
@fediverse
FediForum | The Threadverse - Lemmy, Kbin, PieFed
FediForumlike this
Poliverso - notizie dal Fediverso ⁂ e Informapirata like this.
reshared this
Poliverso - notizie dal Fediverso ⁂ e Fediverse reshared this.
OpenStars
in reply to macfranc • • •Topicverse sounds kinda nice.
To be fair, people were using Threadiverse before Meta revealed that they were working on their Threads. And now they do not want to switch?
youronlyone likes this.
reshared this
Fediverse reshared this.
melroy
in reply to OpenStars • • •like this
FundMECFS, Fitik, youronlyone, vaguerant e Poliverso - notizie dal Fediverso ⁂ like this.
Fediverse reshared this.
OpenStars
in reply to melroy • • •Fediverse reshared this.
can
in reply to OpenStars • • •Lemmy Federate also says this:
Maybe try to get a piefed namedrop there?
Lemmy Federate
lemmy-federate.comlike this
youronlyone e Fitik like this.
Fediverse reshared this.
OpenStars
in reply to can • • •I noticed PieFed.social on page 9, and the link is functional, even though next to it the status says "disabled".
That site doesn't seem very trustworthy. I wonder if it is measuring how "Lemmy-like" an instance is? Anyway I've never heard of that site before, but passing the note to @rimu@piefed.social anyway in case it helps:-).
Fediverse reshared this.
can
in reply to OpenStars • • •It's run by an instance admin. I wanna say lemy.lol?
I believe that just means piefed.social isn't participating in the service.
Edit: is that right, @iso@lemy.lol?
Fediverse reshared this.
iso
in reply to can • • •Yes, it is just disabled. Lemmy Federate supports every threadiverse software and Piefed is one of them.
Currently Piefed communities can be followed by Lemmy instances but not the other way around.
In general, every fediverse software that support FEP-1b12 and can receive Lemmy-like PM’s can register to Lemmy Federate.
/cc @OpenStars@discuss.online @rimu@piefed.social @julian@community.nodebb.org
Fediverse reshared this.
julian
in reply to iso • • •Re: As the creator of Mbin I'm also calling it Threadiverse.
iso
in reply to julian • • •IIRC Lemmy and Mastodon PMs are different and incompatible. If you can receive PMs from Lemmy users then you should be able to receive auth codes. Currently @rikudou@lemmings.world is adding both Lemmy and Mastodon PMs here: github.com/ismailkarsli/lemmy-…
Also software other than Lemmy and Mbin needs to add ‘roleName: Administrator’ to their user webfinger requests. This is because ActivityPub doesn’t have a standard way to expose user roles.
I’m thinking of adding another ways of verifying like DNS based verification but still not sure. Any recommendations are welcome 😀
lemmy-federate/src/lib/activity-pub-client.ts at 8721587b07a3108ebdc7fb0b62a82c62f4e5f549 · ismailkarsli/lemmy-federate
GitHubRikudou_Sage
in reply to julian • • •AP Extensions - Pleroma Documentation
docs.pleroma.socialcan
in reply to iso • • •You mean using your tool, or overall?
iso
in reply to can • • •can
in reply to iso • • •iso
in reply to can • • •can
in reply to iso • • •OpenStars
in reply to iso • • •Yeah something is screwy - PieFed.social is most definitely aware of lemy.lol (see this at piefed.social/instance/lemy.lo…), but the last post it has from your own account seems to be nine months ago, and the second link on that page I linked, to "Posts" yields an error.
Nor does this portion of the conversation appear in this version of the OP (see here, which should have all of these responses below it but they are lacking there).
So apologies, I guess it's not just the tool, rather the issue is wider than that: either your instance lemy.lol or PieFed.social (or both) are not communicating in the standard manner with one another. Fwiw, PieFed.social seems to have no trouble federating with (any? at least the vast majority?) of other Lemmy instances? But I will leave that to you and rimu to work out:-).
lemy.lol overview
piefed.socialiso
in reply to OpenStars • • •Interesting. I didn't realize my instance wasn't federated with Piefed. I'll contact the Piefed admins about this.
However, this issue is probably not related to Lemmy Federate because Piefed.social doesn't even use it.
Lemmy Federate
lemmy-federate.comjulian
in reply to melroy • • •Re: As the creator of Mbin I'm also calling it Threadiverse.
@melroy@kbin.melroy.org NodeBB here, agreed.
It really is the most succinct nickname to describe the type of software we are... and I feel that outweighs possible association with Threads.
like this
Fitik, melroy, youronlyone e vaguerant like this.
melroy
in reply to julian • • •like this
vaguerant likes this.
Coelacanth
in reply to melroy • • •Poliverso - notizie dal Fediverso ⁂
in reply to melroy • •@melroy Unfortunately, as I explained elsewhere, the problem is that Meta has now "infected" the word thread.
For this reason I would propose #topicverse also because in fact, it is not so much the "thread" that characterizes the Lemmy/xBin/Piefed/BBCode environment, but the ability to immediately identify the "topics". In fact, Mastodon also has the thread, even if it is unwatchable, but the topic display is only available in some software (and some apps like Raccoon for Friendica, which allow you to view the topics of activitypub groups also on Mastodon)
@OpenStars
macfranc
2025-05-05 14:53:01
FundMECFS
in reply to OpenStars • • •Forumverse makes the most sense but it really doesn’t roll of the tounge.
Hence I prefer Lemmyverse or Threadiverse.
like this
vaguerant likes this.
OpenStars
in reply to FundMECFS • • •solrize
in reply to OpenStars • • •like this
Aatube likes this.
OpenStars
in reply to solrize • • •technomad
in reply to solrize • • •hilliard
in reply to OpenStars • • •technomad
in reply to hilliard • • •Otter
in reply to technomad • • •OpenStars
in reply to Otter • • •OpenStars
in reply to hilliard • • •hilliard
in reply to OpenStars • • •Skunk
in reply to OpenStars • • •Oh shit my vote made 100%, I didn’t know I was the first to vote.
The Verse it is then 😁
Le Verse in my corner of the world.
can
in reply to Skunk • • •OpenStars
in reply to can • • •Skunk
in reply to can • • •OpenStars
in reply to Skunk • • •creamlike504
in reply to OpenStars • • •technomad
in reply to OpenStars • • •Bulletinfedi?
Forumverse gets my vote out of the listed options.
like this
Aatube likes this.
OpenStars
in reply to technomad • • •can
in reply to OpenStars • • •Aatube
in reply to can • • •lambalicious
in reply to Aatube • • •Aatube
in reply to lambalicious • • •can
in reply to Aatube • • •can
in reply to lambalicious • • •That too. Short for narcotics officer. But can also generally mean to snitch now in slang.
Edit: usage example: to narc on someone
"don't narc on me bro"
"don't let Jeremy find out, he's such a narc"
catloaf
in reply to OpenStars • • •like this
_NetNomad likes this.
OpenStars
in reply to catloaf • • •That is halfway a joke.
We also still have Fediverse, to encompass everything that implements the ActivityPub protocol, e.g. Friendica, Mastodon, Pixelfed, Loops (planned but not implemented yet iirc?). So the Threadiverse/Forumverse/Whatever is meant to distinguish from that.
But Bulletinfedi is distinct enough I think?
like this
Fitik likes this.
LandedGentry
in reply to catloaf • • •sadfsadfsafa
:::
arakhis_
in reply to OpenStars • • •I need ad-like branding on what Mbin and PieFed are.
Im too lazy to look it up
can
in reply to arakhis_ • • •like this
Aatube, SolacefromSilence, Chozo, originalucifer e Fitik like this.
Aatube
in reply to arakhis_ • • •like this
SolacefromSilence e Fitik like this.
OpenStars
in reply to arakhis_ • • •They both have features that Lemmy lacks.
Like PieFed has polls, post flairs, hashtags, categories of communities (basically multi-reddits), which are user customizable and shareable, and a lot more. Though lacking quite a bit of polish such as post and comment previews, and very little to almost no official app support (though an API was recently released and Thunder is being tested, and Interstellar already supports it). It's newer than Lemmy, but written in Python rather than the difficult Rust language, so in many ways has already surpassed Lemmy in terms of features (and even Reddit in some ways too, especially since the only new features there for the last decade were solely aimed at increasing profits rather than good experiences for the users).
Mbin's primary distinction is also supporting federation not only with Lemmy (and PieFed) but also Mastodon. And it has a different interface that some people prefer to Lemmy's. If you want both the Threadiverse/Forumverse/Whatever and Mastodon integration with a single account, this is the only option atm.
Both PieFed and Mbin are entirely separate implementations of the ActivityPub protocol, so whether you actually use them or not it is worth celebrating that Lemmy is now not the only one that implements this forum/thread/basically Reddit replacement style (other notable implementations include Friendica a Facebook replacement, and Mastodon an X/Twitter one, Pixelfed I think an Instagram one, etc.). Especially with Lemmy's association with "tankies" that tends to drive many people away (e.g. 100% of the people that I've ever told about Lemmy irl; and Reddit's r/RedditAlternatives is filled with stories of people who don't want to come here bc of all the BoTh SiDeS sAmE rhetoric that we allow here, plus Lemmy is somehow more authoritian than Reddit even, having a modlog but no modmail, no notification of a moderation event, no ability to discuss bc it simply says that a "mod" did it, and you don't have a right to even so much as be told that your content is now removed! instance admins have much more freedom here, it's fantastic, but actual users only have what manages to trickle down from them, and the software itself very much reflects an authoritarian mindset, even in comparison to Reddit).
Btw, fuck spez.
TLDR: Lemmy isn't the only game in town, yet we need a name that is both distinct from other Fediverse tools (Mastodon, Friendica, Pixelfed, Loops, etc.) while also being inclusive to the other Reddit replacement tools, currently Mbin and PieFed, but in the future including Sublinks, and who knows what else?
like this
originalucifer, dhhyfddehhfyy4673 e bacon_saber like this.
arakhis_
in reply to OpenStars • • •Die4Ever
in reply to OpenStars • • •this is actually an option for instance admins to choose
Otter
in reply to OpenStars • • •I've been using threadiverse, but I prefer forumverse
It's immediately clear what it's referring to, and it leaves it open to other compatible platforms once they implement activity pub nicely. Being able to subscribe and post to official support forums from the forumverse would be a cool promo point
Also people refer to many things as "threads". Conversations, comment sections, discord has threads. Forum is much more clear
like this
ignirtoq e originalucifer like this.
OpenStars
in reply to Otter • • •I used to prefer "Forumverse" as well. But people don't seem to want to use it?
While "Threadiverse" seems to predate Meta's Threads here on Lemmy, see e.g. szmer.info/post/349217 and this comment from Ada lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/9384… from 2+ years ago. Tbf I did find a reference to Forumverse from 2 years ago as well, but then virtually nobody uses it again until essentially db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com rediscovers it a handful of months ago.
So "Threadiverse" has some history behind it, except then Meta ruined the association for many people. But... we here on Lemmy were using it first!!?
GrumpyDuckling
in reply to OpenStars • • •OpenStars
in reply to GrumpyDuckling • • •But that would mean that we mainly talk about Linux...
Which, yup, sounds about right!
In that case though, [puts actshually hat on], wouldn't it be gun+verse?
ilinamorato
in reply to OpenStars • • •OpenStars
in reply to ilinamorato • • •True, but doesn't Xhitter and Bluesky and Mastodon also have a type of voting? Even if it is called or functions slightly differently?
I did not explain much of the back story, but the Fediverse is already the term used to describe federated social media, so the term here that we need is to pick one that describes the specific subset of it that focuses on threaded conversions, centered around those topic areas (called posts, and then those topics being further aggregated into higher-level topics, called communities) rather than centered around a user tweeting/X-creting/whatever their shit.
And we also have a focus on much longer-form content than those others, which like Mastodon have smaller character limits imposed upon their thoughts (so that they cannot ramble on as I have done here:-).
ilinamorato
in reply to OpenStars • • •I don't think likes serve the same function as votes. The downvote, the ranking as a function of score and recency, and the surfacing and consensus-building that comes as a result are the main point of this sort of platform.
By contrast, the microblog "like" (at least on a platform without an algorithm, like Mastodon) doesn't do anything other than express appreciation.
Threads are common in pretty much every form of social media now, from friend-aggregation sites like Facebook and Friendica to messaging services like Discord and Revolt. They're hardly exclusive to a Reddit/Lemmy-type service. Mastodon even organizes posts into threads (though I think that it does so in a much more clumsy way).
(Edit: by "don't they have votes?" do you mean polls? Because that's a completely different function altogether than the Lemmy/Reddit vote.)
OpenStars
in reply to ilinamorato • • •No I did mean up & downvotes, and you added a good perspective. I don't use Mastodon and my main experience there was Kbin, now Mbin, which has both Boosts and actual upvotes (and reduces, which aren't shown, and downvotes).
I think you are correct: the voting was always the core behind why people liked Reddit, as compared to others at the time.
Although it seems like people are more adamant about remaining with Threadiverse, for the sake of history.
But if a new term was to be used, it would be good for it to reflect voting. Like Forumverse does, perhaps?
ilinamorato
in reply to OpenStars • • •Yeah, I think "forumverse" isn't bad. Though I have always felt like a Reddit-like interface and a forum interface are fundamentally different, in some way I can't really put my finger on. I've been involved in bulletin board forums (fora?) in one aspect or another since the late 90s, so maybe it's just nostalgia vs. recency bias; though it could also be the feeling that a "forum" seems like it should be hyper-specific, with different subforums on an already-niche bulletin board scoping down to even more niche and specific areas.
(Side note: Actually, now that I think about it, maybe the forum -> topic -> thread connection is why people like the name "threadiverse." The word "thread" definitely seems like it arose from there.)
Anyway, I am fully ready to admit that I'm yelling at clouds here. Get off my lawn, dang kids and all that.
ilinamorato
in reply to OpenStars • • •OpenStars
in reply to ilinamorato • • •I mean, yeah it'll be better to have a term in which Reddit plays no part in defining is!
And this post is an opportunity to make exactly such a term!
Say "fuck spez" in the absolute best way possible - by moving on and forget that he ever existed, as we build our own stuff here.😁
ilinamorato
in reply to OpenStars • • •celeste
in reply to OpenStars • • •Forumverse, I guess.
(Though I'm always in favor of silly word combos, there aren't many good ones. I like Piebin, but how do you get lemmy in there? Plebin? No thanks.)
Fluffy Kitty Cat
in reply to celeste • • •like this
celeste likes this.
Die4Ever
in reply to Fluffy Kitty Cat • • •like what features are you wanting?
Lemmy already has the "New Comments" sort, which is the biggest feature of forums vs Reddit
Lemmy also has the "Chat" view for comments, which is good but needs to show context with them as my feature request here says github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui/i…
Chat view could show single comment of context · Issue #2544 · LemmyNet/lemmy-ui
GitHubOpenStars
in reply to Fluffy Kitty Cat • • •Yeah, what features? Polls? Community flairs? The ability to restrict downvotes to only members of a community? The ability to combine multiple communities into one overarching category? And then customize that without needing admin support, and then also share that with other users? The ability to personally block every user from an instance, again without requiring admin approval? The ability to automatically label every user that has a brand new account, less than two weeks old? Or that posts 10x more often than they comment, hence might be an unregistered bot account? Or that gives and receives 10x more downvotes than upvotes, so is at best a controversial and at worst a highly toxic personality - but again, independent of an admin or moderator, and instead being totally in control of the user? Or the ability to block posts based on keywords, but perhaps not all such posts, and instead having granularity of All vs. None vs. Some? Or offering hashtags for content discoverability beyond communities and categories of communities? Or the ability to follow anything you want - a community, a user, a post, a comment (even not made by you) - and arguably far more importantly, the ability to NOT receive notifications for something that you wrote?
PieFed has all of that, and more. Lemmy has none of it. Do as you please, but now you know. Check it out: piefed.social/ .
Edit: even Reddit lacks many of these features. As it enshittified, it kept adding features that attempted to boost its profitability, like various forms of irl coinage, rather than provide stuff that people actually wanted to see.
Fluffy Kitty Cat
in reply to OpenStars • • •OpenStars
in reply to Fluffy Kitty Cat • • •_NetNomad
in reply to OpenStars • • •i think threadiverse is the move. partly because it's already in regular use and partky because it's very self-explanatory. forumverse could have some legs to it now that more traditional forum software like nodebb and soon flarum support federation now, maybe it could refer to the broader category containing traditional forums and the threadiverse, but i feel like leaving out the "fedi" part kinda defeats the point (threadiverse at least partially maintains it by being a pun on it). maybe fediforums is the way to go?
it's a whole 'nother can of worms but ironically in my experience the "verse" part of threadiverse is more offputting than the "thread" part because people think "metaverse," but that's just anecdotal and the term fediverse itself already has too much momentum to easily fall out of fashion
like this
originalucifer, Endymion_Mallorn e wildncrazyguy138 like this.
OpenStars
in reply to _NetNomad • • •Yeah and I did not clarify well here that nobody will stop using Fediverse (I think?!): that is a fine term that should continue to exist. But we also need a term for the subset of that which the likes of Lemmy, Mbin, PieFed, and now as you say nodebb and soon flarum (and perhaps eventually Sublinks?) and ofc many others will also join. What is this subset of the Fediverse to be called?
Ngl, I kinda just instantly fell in love with fediforums as you mentioned it right here. However, it also seems fairly similar to Fediverse, perhaps too much so?
Forumverse seems more distinct, from the Fediverse? As too does Threadiverse. And the latter has history and traction, but also seems a bit tainted by association with Meta, who seems to destroy everything that it touches? 😛 Though importantly, we here on Lemmy were using it first! So is that enough justification to reclaim the term, in people's minds? What do you in particular think?
Fitik likes this.
ElectroVagrant
in reply to OpenStars • • •Personally I dislike anything with -verse involved because big companies have run it into the ground and then some.
The boring, dry ways of describing them work best in my opinion.
Federated forums is the driest, most technical and to the point but not very telling.
Swap out forum for link aggregator and you have similar, arguably even more technical (certainly more of a mouthful).
Connected/linked forums might be more approachable, more readily conveying how these are separate forums but networked together.
Cross-forums may work as well to the same end, but not sure how immediately understandable cross may be in this context and outside of gaming spaces.
Whatever the case I kind of think this has things backwards. What's more important than describing and talking about the backend tech is pointing people to any of the sites built with them that have anything of interest to them to bother with. I can't think of anything online I've ever gone to or used because someone told me it was using Apache, Nginx, phpBB, or like an Open Source Web Server or using such and such CDN.
The reason why is simple: next to nobody talks like that. The only people that might are deep in web dev.
like this
xep likes this.
ToastedRavioli
in reply to ElectroVagrant • • •JubilantJaguar
in reply to ElectroVagrant • • •OpenStars
in reply to ElectroVagrant • • •On the other hand, the software used has an ENORMOUS effect upon the quality and such of the communication. e.g. forum software such as Lemmy allow much longer-form, topic-based discussions than e.g. Mastodon where you have to follow a particular user account or else you won't see anything at all. So "Mastodon" implies extreme difficulty in having conversations in the first place, especially for non-technical, normie users, and also a heavily short-form tweets/X-cretes/skeets/whatever, user-centric form of communication. Whereas Lemmy allows me to ramble on for quite awhile, and even if you don't follow my account, by being interested in this topic, you'll see my words.
So software isn't everything, but it also is not nothing either.
Anyway, we could call ourselves anything we like. Brain-dead fart pirates, I don't care, so long as we pick a name:-). It might help to pick one that people like though, especially the people that contribute much to making this place what it is.
I personally don't mind -verse. I don't watch most Marvel movies to begin with, and the word itself carries connotations of "the universe", which is what we want I think bc we are talking about like "the set of all, i.e. the universe of, connected (using ActivityPub protocol) forum-like software platforms". Hence Fediverse at the high end, i.e. including such platforms as Mastodon and Friendica and Pixelfed, but at the lower end... what there? Threads? ActivityPub Forums? Any short, catchy moniker may work -> so what is it then?
lambalicious
in reply to OpenStars • • •Lembipie. What else?
(And why does this particular subset need a name, anyway? The plus combo is easier to get the point across with)
OpenStars
in reply to lambalicious • • •It was Lemmy+Mbin.
Now it's already up to Lemmy+Mbin+PieFed+nodebb.
And flarum and Sublinks may be added at some point as well.
So the plus syntax, now that there's already 4-6 of them (7 if you count Kbin but there's only a single instance in the entire world, in Poland I believe, that uses it these days, everyone else switched to Mbin), seems untenable?
MyOpinion
in reply to OpenStars • • •like this
Endymion_Mallorn likes this.
OpenStars
in reply to MyOpinion • • •That works for Lemmy + K/Mbin.
But now with +PieFed, +nodebb, and soon +flarum, and perhaps +Sublinks, Lemmyville doesn't seem very inclusive?
I already started this as a poll about post flairs, neither of which features is nor is expected to appear on Lemmy very soon iirc. The rest of the Fediverse isn't waiting around for coders to learn Rust and eventually getting around to adding features to Lemmyville.
So Lemmy in particular may want to not start being exclusive! It will get left behind if it does!
LandedGentry
in reply to OpenStars • • •sadfsadfsafa
:::
like this
Endymion_Mallorn likes this.
fleebleneeble
in reply to LandedGentry • • •LandedGentry
in reply to fleebleneeble • • •sadfsadfsafa
:::
OpenStars
in reply to LandedGentry • • •I think one of the major tropes present in the show was to demonstrate how there aren't simply white hats vs. black hats (to use cowboy terms). Mal is a criminal, "forced" into living that way bc the government won't "allow" him to live legitimately (except... really? Why won't they again?). Therefore, the presence of great darkness within his lightness, or as you might prefer the presence of occasional boughts of lightness within his darkness, is not a "bug", it's a "feature" of the show, to walk out that yin and yang in a fantasy space opera setting.
Nobody is perfect. Some are far less so than others. Those at least tend to be aware of their imperfections, as opposed to e.g. The Galactic Empire muwhahaha, ahem cough, anyways they seem so stolid, so absolutely certain of their moral righteousness, that unlike the criminal Mal who often isn't such a bad guy once you get to know him, commits atrocities the likes of which would turn people's stomachs, if they knew (hence those are kept as closely guarded secrets).
So I think you missed that: from the perspective of the show, that was no accident - that was literally the entire point of what they were attempting to convey. Mal was not a "good guy". He just had light in his darkness, the same way that the empire has darkness in its light (or is it rather the other way around?).
LandedGentry
in reply to OpenStars • • •sadfsadfsafa
:::
OpenStars
in reply to LandedGentry • • •Yay Jayne was fairly simplistic. The dude barely had any morality bc he was more animal than man. So in that way he played a "straight man" to Mal'a greater level of complexity? He even gave voice to what many of the others were thinking, including Mal himself, but they had the grace to not say it.
True evil requires a minimum amount of "character" in order to achieve anything at all - great or otherwise. So it's less like Jayne was "bad" and the government was "good", and more like Jayne was simplisticly animal-like, while the true evils rose up much higher. With great power comes great responsibility, or whatever.
Jayne is like a wall painting in the background - he's scenery?
As far as Whedon, I dunno, I like a lot of his works, I don't like his character. The two aren't entirely connected in my mind, though perhaps they should be more so, I just don't know.
On the other hand, wasn't all of this pretty much happening even while the show was still in production? You mentioned that it had "aged", so I wasn't coming at this from a perspective of bad show vs. good show, but from it having been a good show where something external caused its goodness to have tanked. If it had been bad at the start, then we wouldn't say that it "aged", just that the show sucked. Which it didn't... and yet, also... didn't it always though? That yin and yang seemed to me to have not been so much changed by the passage of time?
Edit: oh, I haven't heard of whatever has been revealed about the actor who plays Jayne. Maybe that's what you meant. It might change my own perspective of the show in that case. I would hope not actually... but it might.
LandedGentry
in reply to OpenStars • • •As a sngegngmegmegm
:::
LandedGentry
in reply to OpenStars • • •sadfsadfsafa
:::
OpenStars
in reply to LandedGentry • • •LandedGentry
in reply to OpenStars • • •sadfsadfsafa
:::
wildncrazyguy138
in reply to OpenStars • • •like this
dhhyfddehhfyy4673 likes this.
DeuxChevaux
in reply to OpenStars • • •flamingos-cant
in reply to OpenStars • • •schnurrito
in reply to OpenStars • • •I've been calling it threadiverse because that is what I saw most other people call it.
Really all it is is "ActivityPub groups" or if that is too technical, "fediverse groups".
like this
youronlyone likes this.
Snoopy
in reply to OpenStars • • •Well, if you look at the sidebar of !fediverse@piefed.social i included NodeBB. 😅
In this post too 🥹
So it can't be Lemmy,Mbin,PieFed. And i'm adding flarum.
However, we can create separate category :
- aggregator link : lemmy,mbin,piefed
- forum : nodebb, flarum
1) Thank to Meta, i don't like it...
2) My favorite one, it remind me of forum era
3) Abstract and beautiful. Poetry, bible and verb. Something we have never see before 😊.
4) i'm against. Link aggregator shouldn't be tied by a software name but a global concept as thread of forum. If i have 6 softwares...do you write them all ?
5) linkagg lousy but pratical. Bad name are the best. 😎
I think we should redo the post, but, for now, let's see where it go 😊
Edit : added answer
Snoopy
2025-05-03 03:14:23
OpenStars
in reply to Snoopy • • •So far, mainly from this post bc the poll has such a small sample size, the term that seems vastly preferred is Threadiverse. Bc of its history, and how people have already been calling it that. Sort this post by Hot to see what I mean.
I don't think Forumverse is "bad", plus as you say it better represents the new additions of nodebb and flarum. Although that term would be swimming against the tide of people that have been using Threadiverse all this time and seem to not want to switch (possibly bc I did not explain the situation well, especially the clarification about the term Fediverse already existing, and now how the situation is a bit different wrt nodebb and flarum).
Ofc this is all just on a Sunday -> there is still lots of room for things to happen in the next coming days, to see how these results may shift:-).
pewgar_seemsimandroid
in reply to OpenStars • • •omgboom
in reply to OpenStars • • •OpenStars
in reply to omgboom • • •Might be too obvious:-).
Alternatively, The Linux hangout.
irelephant
in reply to OpenStars • • •OpenStars
in reply to irelephant • • •irelephant
in reply to OpenStars • • •youronlyone
in reply to OpenStars • • •When the first Reddit migration happened, the migrants called it #Threadiverse and has always been that way. Although some tried to change it (Threads was not around yet, or public, IIRC), it didn't work, the migrants prefer Threadiverse so it stuck.
Changing names in the Fediverse is not easy since it has grown humongous already. Back in 2008 it was simply called #Identiverse. Then a few years later it morphed into the #Fediverse (this was before ActivityPub, yes, the Fediverse is years older than ActivityPub).
Back in 2021/2022, we tried to change the name "Fediverse" because Twitter migrants and the Press/Media were whining too much about it. Even though we reached a consensus, the we were far too small compared to the number of new people.
The people who kept on complaining about the name "Fediverse", when they were asked to participate in the disucssion and polls, they did not. When they were presented with the new name, they either ignored us or started whining again. 🤷🏽
Anyway, if there's a huge population involved, it's not going to be easy.
Now, I'm not discouraging you, rather, I shared our experience in the hopes that you'll find a better way. Because personally, I'm not so fond of "Threadiverse", haha.
If you use, for example, the lemmyBB interface, it's no longer "threadi", it's a forum. 😝 (I know, lame reason.)
Oh! One thing that came out of trying to rename the Fediverse, people don't want "-verse" anywhere because it's overused. Multiverse. Metaverse. Fediverse. Threadiverse. Benverse. Omniverse. Panverse. Whoverse. Trekverse.
like this
youronlyone, Fitik e vaguerant like this.
youronlyone
in reply to youronlyone • • •Hmm… I like the -ville suggestion. #Threadiville perhaps?
So:
- Fediverse
- Threadiville local group
- Mbin galaxy
- Fedia IO planet
- Kbin galaxy
- Kbin social planet
- Nodebb galaxy
- Lemmy galaxy
- Lemmy World planet
- Microville local group
- Mastoforks galaxy
- Pleroma galaxy
- Writingville local group
- Plume galaxy
- WriteFreely galaxy
- Ghost galaxy
- Faceville local group
- Friendica galaxy
- -key forks galaxy
- CMSville local group
- Hubzilla galaxy
- Drupal galaxy
- Wordpress galaxy
😁
like this
youronlyone likes this.
OpenStars
in reply to youronlyone • • •Tagging @Snoopy@piefed.social.
This is a great summary of the history of the topic, thank you!😀
youronlyone likes this.
can
in reply to youronlyone • • •youronlyone
in reply to can • • •It started as a suggestion, then we compiled it and made phases of polls. (The instance clised shop, unfortunately.)
Based on those, the most that got the votes was the suggestion "Mycelium". It was inspired by Star Trek: Discovery and the real-world mycelium.
The second one, I can't remember but it was also related to nature's fungi or plants.
The list of suggestions and votes were based on who participated. And at the time it was done, it was the Twitter Migration, and people were complaining loudly about the name "Fediverse". And yet, those who participated were mostly pre-Migration people (who generally didn't have a strong issue with "Fediverse"). 😄
Allero
in reply to OpenStars • • •can
in reply to Allero • • •Madbrad200
in reply to OpenStars • • •OpenStars
in reply to Madbrad200 • • •The word itself sounds nice, but is the least inclusive.
That's like saying that all of these conversations that we all have are on Lemmy.World? Sure, it's between 50 and 80% true (users and the most active communities, respectively, including this one we are in now), but it misses a ton of nuance and detail there.
PieFed, Mbin, and now nodebb, with others on the way (flarum, perhaps Sublinks) also exist.
So why call this all "Lemmy", when that's only a part - granted, by far the majority portion - of the whole?
like this
Fitik e vaguerant like this.