Salta al contenuto principale


I don't think people are realising the danger the Fediverse is in.

The only thing stopping corporations and VCs taking over this place is that the Fediverse is spread out on many different servers, which makes it very difficult to purchase.

If most of the Fediverse ends up on mastodon.social, which is now a strong possibility, there will be nothing to stop most of it being sold to Musk or Zuckerberg or whoever.

The bigger mastodon.social becomes, the more likely a buyout is to happen.

(1/4)
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Here's what Eugen Rochko's Mastodon gGmbH organisation now controls:

-The Mastodon server software & API (though the current version is FOSS)
-The mastodon.social server, which has 1 in 7 of all Fediverse users
-The official Mastodon apps, now telling people to just sign up on mastodon.social
-The official website at joinmastodon.org
-The trademark for the word "mastodon", which lets them dictate terms to any server which uses it

This is a tempting package for any potential buyers.

(2/4)
Questa voce è stata modificata (1 anno fa)
in reply to FediTips has moved!

The trademark alone gives Mastodon gGmbH huge power, it lets them tell any server using the word "mastodon" in its domain name what software or forks it can use.

And it's getting worse. Mastodon gGmbH is now making official apps which direct people to sign up on mastodon.social instead of a random trusted server or choice of trusted servers.

The more people sign up on mastodon.social, the more tempting Mastodon gGmbH becomes as a takeover target.

(3/4)

reshared this

in reply to FediTips has moved!

With all that in mind, here's a suggestion:

➡️ *IF* mastodon.social becomes more than 50% of the Fediverse, either by total users or monthly active users, the rest of us should defederate it.

Sticking with mastodon.social because "that's where the people are" is pointless. Centralised growth will simply cause the governance problems we've seen on Twitter and Facebook to be replicated on here.

Growth has to be decentralised in order to protect the independence of all Fedi servers.

(4/4)

reshared this

in reply to FediTips has moved!

How do I switch servers? How do I find a suitable server for me?
in reply to Crookedlilhouse

@Crookedlilhouse
After a quick google search, here is a step-by-step guide on how to switch servers: https://nerdschalk.com/change-or-switch-servers-on-mastodon-step-by-step-guide/

If you want to find a server, https://instances.social has basically all of them, and at https://wehavecookies.social we always welcome new users.

ZZ Bottom reshared this.

in reply to BentiGorlich

@BentiGorlich@Crookedlilhouse thank you. I am trying to find one that I can move to. I hope I will able to keep all my friends☺️
in reply to Karin Sorenby

@kcsorenby@BentiGorlich@Crookedlilhouse are you trying to move from mstdn.social? its a separate server than mastodon.social and administrated by a completely independent team afaik, so i think youre okay if thats the intention.
in reply to Crookedlilhouse

@Crookedlilhouse the fedi tips website contains information on how to switch, and there is a list of servers on https://joinmastodon.org (Mastodon servers only) and https://fedi.garden
Questa voce è stata modificata (1 anno fa)
in reply to Experiencer (Mastodon)

@Crookedlilhouse fedi.directory oops

that's for accounts to follow, can't remember the one was for picking a server
in reply to Experiencer (Mastodon)

@experiencersinternational@Crookedlilhouse@fediverseobserver has a great way of finding different servers and keeps up to date on which ones have appeared and which have died. You can even sort them geographically at https://fediverse.observer/
in reply to Crookedlilhouse

@Crookedlilhouse
Hello!

There are a collection of servers on https://joinmastodon.org/servers, also on https://instances.social as well as on https://fedi.garden/

My server is also open, but mainly for people living in Sweden.
in reply to Crookedlilhouse

@Crookedlilhouse

Here is my experience switching:

https://wigbert.medium.com/mastodon-migration-how-to-change-your-instance-server-and-why-97776abec52d
in reply to FediTips has moved!

But then nothing else really changes outside of that. He still owns the trademarks. The official apps still get people signing up on m.s preferentially. m.s becomes another corporate silo.

Sure, the rest of us would be rid of mastodon.social, but if that instance is really that big then all we've done is turn them into another birbsite, and then there's the rest of us.

Defederation isn't as big a threat as it sounds, because if m.s is that big, it's self sustaining. It doesn't actually need the rest of the Fediverse.

ZZ Bottom reshared this.

in reply to FediTips has moved!

everyone should defederate it anyway, given their horribly insufficient moderation.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

”We had to burn down the village to save it” never goes out of vogue, huh?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Respectfully, I am not sure this would have the effect you desire.

If the few try to silence the many, this often fails and they are in turn silenced. Witness the myriad open source projects that decide to fork and then simply die from lack of contributors.
in reply to Feoh🤓💾👁️

@Feoh Not even talking about the sheer waste of time and effort on too many half-baked forks. Really wonder where the Fediverse could be now I'd we only had the same amount of people actually working on fewer projects and striving for better quality...

@Fedi.Tips
in reply to FediTips has moved!

When I joined, I spent half an hour trying to find a server that suited me and couldn't find one. That's why I chose social.
If choosing a server doesn't become much simpler, there is no way the direction will change.

nikol reshared this.

in reply to FediTips has moved!

Defederating a server just because it's popular is saying "I don't want to receive emails from Google or Microsoft", which is just crazy sounding.

For providing tips on how to use Mastodon and the Fediverse, you're actively leveraging your platform to spread opinions and propaganda, removing your status of being purely an informational service to the community.

reshared this

in reply to FediTips has moved!

did mastodon.social reopen registrations again? Because the "create account" button on their site doesn't do anything. Is it only through the app?
Also, I feel that if any VC's decide to muscle in they'll go after ActivityPub like Google did with Android and Chromium. Makes them immune to defederation.
There's also the fact that while mastodon.social has grown substantially I don't think it's going to beat the coming corporate offerings in terms of actual marketshare

nikol reshared this.

in reply to FediTips has moved!

I don’t disagree with you, but I don’t think you’re going change herd behavior, particularly given the fact that people will have a tendency to congregate where the news gathers. The Fediverse is good for generating new systemization. I think we need to see what develops.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I see a lot of people complaining that Mastodon adoption is limited by its complexity. It's a valid criticism in itself, but I feel that too many people fail to understand that the complexities are a deliberate design choice, because simplicity is a facade for empire and domination.

Computers and communication are inherently complex, and apparent simplicity means you're being deceived and manipulated.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I followed you for tips on the fediverse, not lectures on ideology. Consider renaming your account.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

thank you for this vital information.🧡

I'm happy I moved my backup account from mastodon.social to a smaller independent server a few days ago.

I really don't feel like bird situations over here.🙏

nikol reshared this.

in reply to FediTips has moved!

Doesn’t a buyout also require a sellout? Can I ask why you assume Rochko and his org are so likely to do this? You’re looking at it as an inevitability, but I can’t see how you know with certainty what the future will bring?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Es ist doch so, dass man zuerst bei mastodon.social eincheckt und wenn man sich aklimatisiert hat auf einen passenden Server wechselt. So habe ich das gelesen. Viele machen ja bei Mastodon nicht weiter, weiil sie es mühsamer als Twitter finden.
Der Ansatz ergibt insofern Sinn, da viele schon vor dem Einstieg, durch die Suche nach einem passenden Server, völlig überfordert sind.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Sheesh. People weren't kidding when they said Mastodon is a hostile place for newcomers!

"Come to Mastodon where we'll ban you for... coming to Mastodon."™
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Some notes on this position:

1. Probably a lot more of mastodon.social accounts are junk than you realize, come visit our local timeline, lol.
2. The app leans into a default server because it's the top reason people just... don't join the fediverse at all. Server choice is hard, and we should onboard people and *then* convince them to move.
3. Medium, Flipboard, Facebook's P92, etc. will absolutely dwarf anything Eugen controls as they grow into the fediverse.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I only joined a different server because the main mastadon one was not accepting new users at the time. This whole fediverse thing is somewhat mysterious to me. How can one server dictate conditions to other servers?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I think that if there was any mention of selling the domain, a large number of users would move elsewhere. That's the advantage of a federated approach. So suddenly the deal wouldn't seem so profitable.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

People go where they want to go. It’s our choice for our reasons.
What I hear in your statement resonates not of growth based upon freedom of choice; but rather, intimates manipulation and control. It’ll sort itself out as it will; and that, as I see it, is the whole point.
I see your point, but man things sure can get a bit paradoxical. Ain’t that just like life?
✌️
in reply to FediTips has moved!

two things:
1. I feel like 50% (or even 40%) might be too late and too big to change. We should try to wait for 20% or 30% before defederating.
2. Would it be a good idea to make a website for instances to pledge to defederate when mastodon.social reaches the target threshold to defederate, and also to create early visable pressure?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

If everyone is on one server it would be like all of the internet being served by one company. It's power is in the fact that no one company controls a majority of the servers. If you create your account on a different server you can still follow an account reading elsewhere.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I'm on mastodon.social and I completely agree with you. I hope a significant number of others on this instance will join in and tell Rochko & Co that this isn't OK. No one wants this.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Advocating to defederate mastodon.social is not good. You're fearmongering about some dystopian fantasy you fear may happen.
1) If a big company wants to "take over" as Twitter 2.0, they'll just do it-they don't have to buy m.s., which is teensy compared to what their size would be.
2) If fediverse keeps growing, there will be more and larger servers. Should we defederate from every one that gets "too big" and fragment the fediverse?
3) No one owns ActivityPub--the fediverse is safe.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I'm not arguing that you're wrong. I think (and regularly advocate that) people should have accounts on small servers, because decentralization is the single best thing about the fediverse. With that said, I'm on mastodon.social because when I started using mastodon in 2017, I got three accounts and both the other servers I was on have shut down. m.s is still alive. Now, I have four other accounts, and use them, but m.s has been dependable.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

god this is some pathetic shit, roughly zero people actually care about federation
in reply to FediTips has moved!

ok so I’m with mastodon.social just because after much delay, trial and error I managed to create an account there. I haven’t a clue about how to change instances and given the time it took to get going and that I’ve invested in getting settled here, I don’t want to be told ‘start again’ just because you perceive my instance to be ‘too popular’. I can’t be the only one in this position?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

For now, I'm mostly on mastodon.social for the "explore" feature, which is often empty on smaller instances. I did get an account on a different server though and I think I will move at some point in the future.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I am 100% for defederating if a server gets too big compared to the others. Or would muting be better?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Mastodon ≠ Fediverse. Why are you so concerned? Money buys eyeballs for advertising but it doesn’t work on the Fediverse, or Mastodon as it’s not a walled garden.

You provide a valuable service yourself, don’t dilute that.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

we should not be absolutist. A network cannot grow without some degree of centralization. I got booted out of my instance because they didn't like US news so I ended up on one on the bigger instances. If you remove even those, people will just give up. Many users need convenience.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Step 1. Block all emails coming from gmail.com.

Step 2. There is no step 2 because you wont do it.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

If then Mastodon organization is ever taken over, we can all move to other instances without great loss. The instance should only be defederated if its policies change significantly.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I may be using Mastodon incorrectly but I tried out 4-5 diff servers and wasn’t really finding any chatter until I finally joined mastodon.social and suddenly I’m seeing a lot more interesting people and more people are showing up when I search. If I move again I want to know I’ll still be able to access as many threads
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Apparently, the admin regarding rule-breaking and such is not keeping up with the influx of users as is.

I agree that the trend is not good. Too much in one place and too tempting.

If I ran a server with the name mastodon in it now, I would be looking for another URL.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Thanks. Good points.
Us “regular users” may need instructions on how to migrate off of mastodon social.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Or, you know, you could wait for your worst-case scenario to actually happen rather than say "This thing that might be bad could happen in these circumstances so let's take drastic action right now to head off this theoretical possibility."
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Excellent points. I'll have to check out other instances to find a suitable home.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I think this is a very important point.

It makes a lot of sense to start talking about what is required of platforms to be considered good fediverse citizens.

AFAIK, both Pixelfed and Lemmy actively encourage people to diversify into multiple servers.

Without a good set of ideas around what’s required, and why, it’s pretty meaningless to just get upset and predict nightmare scenarios. You need thought out principles and consequences.

☝️This is a good start.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

This is probably the only strategy that would work, but at 50% you're way too late. At that point, network effects plus the huge control over the ecosystem as you describe lets them just say "pff, go ahead, don't need you".

I think 20% would be a much better target - and I realize it's getting close now.

Maybe I should write a bot that just posts instructions on how to move your account to an independent instance, and point it at hashtags related to mastodon.social...
in reply to FediTips has moved!

This is a ridiculous suggestion. Fracturing the fediverse over a completely arbitrary benchmark is like burning a village in order to save it. I've been happy on this server for many years. Except for a few hiccups it has been stable and available, I am happy with the moderation, and the users are friendly and well disposed to follow (and boost) accounts on other servers. That you would want to block my access to other users over your theoretical concerns is maddening.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I really don't like the decision to make mastodon.social the only default server (suggesting one at random from a larger pool would be better), but I don't think I like that response either.

It's my position that general-purpose public servers should only defederate for being a source of content incompatible with that server's policies. A federated communication network where much of the network is inaccessible to many of the people using it loses its primary utility.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

This is a very important thought: what if mastodon.social and the legal entity behind it become an ever-larger percentage of the #Fediverse? When do we need to say "stop"? And how do we say "stop"?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

wow, that feels like a really excessive overreaction. I hope you change your mind!
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I just lost my 20k+ tweets on the #BorgSite. I'd hate to lose a similar number of #toots again.

In order to prevent your, alas not unlikely, scenario, migrating #toots/#posts would be my utmost priority regarding development.

Regarding the limited features on #Mastodon, I'd give #Akkoma a shot. This would possibly give the #Fediverse an additional boost, as the limited features on rival platforms are always an issue.

I hope that developers take notice of this scenario.

"The...
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I see your point but consider that (1) Mastodon accounts are portable and anyone can just move their account to another server and (2) there is nothing stopping corporations or MAGA extremists from setting up their own server and moving en masse to it to become the larger mastodon server. But, I believe users can block an entire instance, limiting their reach. So I think the defenses are there.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I think 50% is way too late. At that point if everyone else defederates, then going where there's the most community means going to mastodon.social rather than to the fediverse at large. If we're going to defederate to prevent over-centralisation, it should be at 1/4 or 1/3 of the fediverse, not 1/2.

"Fog in channel; Europe isolated"
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Ok then use other servers, not mastodon.social.
I use mastodon.world. Also a very good server, thanks to @ruud !
🤗
@Ruud

Wilson reshared this.

in reply to FediTips has moved!

Good points here. I was on a small niche server that closed down so I moved to the bigger mas.to server to avoid that happening again. I do miss having a local feed based around a topic, so I might try to find a medium size server.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

50% is a bit late, because then it's an equal choice on which side to pick for users.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

@RigsbySiv Nobody could stopp Google, Insta or any other big company becoming the major instance in Mastodon
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Why not, instead of defederation, introduce a rate limit? .. let's say, just x% of all msgs exchanged may be exchanged with a single instance. This will have to grow organically and may make users move to other instances if a central one suddenly feels unwell ...

@scy
@scy
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Well, the whole "matrix" communications ecosystem relies on the official matrix.org server. Seems nobody cares
in reply to FediTips has moved!

i guess mastodon social could voluntarily defederate and do its own thing i guess.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

It's an inherent problem with the way Mastodon is designed. We should not need instances, but relays instead.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

IMO if @Gargron (and Mastodon GmbH) believes in the principles of federation they should stop accepting users into mastodon.social and encourage signups on other instances.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

p.s. Today I've had several people telling me that VCs would never make an offer for Mastodon gGmbH. But according to Eugen, "more than five" offers have already been made.

Here's what Eugen said in an interview with the Financial Times in December 2022:

"Rochko told the FT he had received offers from more than five US-based (venture capital) investors to invest 'hundreds of thousands of dollars' in backing the product, following its fast growth."

https://www.ft.com/content/de808736-2e05-4c3b-a53c-55b170ae9efd (paywalled)
in reply to FediTips has moved!

That is encouraging for now, but will his heirs be as steadfast?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

this 🧵 is a good heads up on the VC issue (threat).

This is what I’m here for: “Mastodon’s independence, and the choice of moderation styles across its servers, [are] part of its attraction”. I’m on Spoutible 🐳, too, trying out both as alternatives to 🐦. I like both, but there’s definitely a positive creative and independent vibe here that is different from a monolithic “central server”.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Dear Friends of the Cooler Cats,

Money is an object of only vested interests.

We poor gullible freedom freaks are not so easily bought, enslaved and pawned …

For example I sold my sole to the devil for an empty phish can …

Fortunately I obtained nothing of value, from no one believable …
🙏🫶😸
in reply to FediTips has moved!

US based VC - who probably have no clue about German corporate law.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

There’s a myth in the making here… “The Five Temptations of #JohnMastodon”.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Only one solution here : raise the drawbridge, close the gate, forbid any account creation, and then engage the Purge of those whose commitment to Sparkle Motion could be in doubt. Only once Mastodon is Pure again will it be reopened as the most friendly, open and accepting social media.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I am the developer of a midsized browser extension and I am getting buyout offers the past years pretty frequently. It's meaningless.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

No, we didn't tell you that VCs wouldn't make an offer. It's that Mastodon as a non-profit gGmbH wouldn't be able to accept it. Please take a look at the legal requirements that exist for gGmbHs. They are not the same as for a (for-profit) GmbH.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

while you are right about the danger, i dislike your suggestion, its just destructive.
also keep in mind that all this started out quite different than fb and the like, theres a _very_ different mission from day one, its floss, its a Ggmbh (wich might even protect from selling out?).
yet dangers are there, but on a complete different level than twitter has always been!
i'm not a fan of the default-sever-move, too, but: i never understood the mastodon-is-so-difficult-people
in reply to FediTips has moved!

One risk which concerns me is a "catch and kill" from Facebook, Twitter, or Trump's "Truth Social."

Mastodon.social being sold is one thing. Not good, but survivable.

Mastodon gGmbH or its assets such as the code being bought means serious problems.

Calling having independent federated servers an "ideology" rather than an essential feature, talking VC talk about "onboarding process" and so on, I think the ship has already sailed.

Leaving mastodon.social is the best early response

@feditips

in reply to FediTips has moved!

How does your grandmother know what a trusted server is, compared to mastodon.social? It's like everyone using Microsoft or Google for email. Choices are endless, but leaving too many choices for the users causes decision paralysis.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Regarding the usage of the trademark it might be a little bit more complicated...

nikol reshared this.

in reply to FediTips has moved!

So, there's this social networking app called Mastodon, and people are surprised that many are flocking to mastodon.social instead of cat.turd (or whatever)?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

So in migrating here I had understood that a German techie rote the software we use and made it free to use. The beauty was it wasn’t owned by anyone & couldn’t be bought.
It sounds more like he kept some strings attached to the software & basically got others to shell out for expenses like servers, admins, maintenance etc, so that it becomes valuable without him putting up $$. My bubble is burst!
#fediverse
in reply to FediTips has moved!

To be fair, *someone* has to hold the Mastodon trademark, otherwise any (multi-billion dollar) company could step in and claim it.

"Linux" is also a trademarked term (owned by Linus or the Linux Foundation). They just decided to not care how anyone uses it but they have to have it in order to protect it.

But I fully agree to all other points.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Not an expert in the field, but a German gGmbH is a special non-profit construct. As one consequence, the seller does not profit from selling the gGmbH.
Not saying that this is fool-proof, but it surely disincentivizes a takeover.
Also not saying that this is an argument against decentralization, just helping to evaluate the risk you described.
In contrast to this, Google finds a Mastodon gGmbH in Benin (not Berlin), which looks like a holding. This seems a bit strange to me.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

It’s unlikely @Gargron would have an incentive to sell the gGmbH as it is a non-profit company. As far as I know it is only allowed to sell this kind of company at nominal value (the money the shareholders put into it).
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I would be very interested to see a coherent explanation of the legal mechanism by which Mastodon gGmbh could meaningfully use its trademarks to prevent non-commercial use, even if it wanted to (which remains to be demonstrated), much less dictate terms on software forks.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

CAN a "gGmbh" actually be taken over, though?

I mean, it's not as if the shareholders could get paid out.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

This is a long time issue:. The left leaning digital, radio, TV, media has never been a profit center. This contrasted with RW media, from 1990s has been an emerging, evolving, growth industry.

2004, I proposed project institute to create the draw of people to common reality baseline, using various methods, capacity builders, etc.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

why do they design an official app in such a way? Are they going to sell it?
in reply to Declan

Because Gargron has embraced the magic and shiney alure of the #Sunnyvale Syndrome - yup, tube to move away from there #MastoPub silo.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

In the US, non-profit organizations are protected from this kind of predatory takeover because, as non-profits, they aren't easily monetizable. That's how the Wikimedia Foundation works, for example. Does the German gGmbH designation offer similar protections?

nikol reshared this.

in reply to FediTips has moved!

And this should all not be the case.

Granted, #ActivityPub as a #MultiVendor / #MultiProvider - #Standard will outlive #Mastodon anyway, just as #HTML & #JavaScript outlived #Mosaic & #Netscape.

At most Mastodon will die out like #ActiveX, #InternetExplorer & #Twitter nowadays and #Windows ["Server"] in the future...
in reply to FediTips has moved!

@feditips.

Been hearing how Mastodon cannot be taken over by one Musky type of asshole.

Now on Mastodon, I am seeing this about Mastodon pointing specifically at Mastodon Socal can be taken over by one Musky asshole? WTF?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

you're overlooking the fact that Mastodon gGmbH is a gGmbH: similar to a public benefit corporation in the US, a non-profit corporation, it *can't* be bought or sold (afaik) — https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/ao_1977/__52.html
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Since the trademark thing keeps coming up: it bears keeping in mind that the code is still MIT-licensed.

The gGmbh gets to dictate terms to things that want to call themselves “Mastodon” - it doesn’t get to dictate terms to anyone running the code under a different name.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Then stop promoting Mastodon as a substitute for Fediverse.
Basically, it was you who gave Eugen that power. Or maybe it is not your https://fedi.tips/ that describes Mastodon as the only solution?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

It’s not tempting because as a gGmbh (non-profit company) all the profit stays in the company and does not flow the owner. And you can‘t change that easily.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I downloaded the Mastodon app, and this was the landing screen I got - a clear choice between joining mastodn.social or joining another instance. With the second, you are forwarded to a list of instances, complete with search functionality.

Yes, this is obviously biased towards mastodon.social, but it's hardly a Microsoft-style monopoly. And what else are they supposed to do in the face of constant cries of "Mastodon is too complex to join!"?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

how do servers pivot if the person holding the trademark dictates unreasonable terms?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I totally agree. This seems super dangerous to me as well. I think it's an example of why no one person should control the lion's share of Fediverse software.

I SUSPECT that Eugen & Co are doing this from good intentions. The SINGLE biggest hurdle to Fediverse adoption, or at least what we hear the most kvetching about, is the fact that you have to decide which instance to join.

This is ludicrous for those of us who've 'lived here' a while, but in a world where people are used to being force fed by the Algorithm, choice is a burden rather than a boon.

I honestly don't know how to fix that.

From a concrete perspective, what should we do? Eugen owns Mastodon. It's an open source project, so if they go forward with this people are free to fork.

Or even better, perhaps this is an opportunity to signal boost other instance software that doesn't funnel everyone into mastodon.social?

nikol reshared this.

in reply to Feoh🤓💾👁️

I do see your point. It is absolutely valid. However, I feel a bit less worried about it, at this point, since I would expect people to migrate to other instances in masses, if misuse would happen.

I feel, it is important to establish a variety of large trusted server instances. Its not easy for newbies to arrive here, so signing in on mastodon.social feels quite natural.

Also, many other large instances may include limitations like language restrictions....

@feoh
in reply to marc [sustain release] ✅

Furthermore, I think it is important to make people aware, that their experience may improve on a server that might have a focus on an area of their interest.

However, I'm expecting more new users to arrive on specialised servers through dedicated communities.

At this point, it may even be helpful to join some forces on the main server to assist with and monitor the development of infrastructure costs.

But generally you are right. It's important to watch the development...

@feoh
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I didn't realise there were that many people on mastodon.social! Pretty sure it's under 100K users here on mstdn.social thankfully.

I have a Calckey backup which has something like 700 or 800 users if something ever happens though.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

It's always inevitable this will happen. There's a starting point, and then it becomes too big to manage it alone, and with infrastructure scaling requiring money (let alone paying developers), a business will be made.

No one has to use the official apps, they simply just exist. Mastodon is trademarked to protect the name. If the owner doesn't do it, a malicious person would.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

This is bad.
This is very, very bad.
Mastodon does not need a BDFL. It should belong to all of us.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

It's sad to see these replies completely missing the point of why many left Twitter, yet they'd allow it to happen here. You'd think history wouldn't repeat itself so quickly.
in reply to Berg Am Laimerin

sadly, the common register portal does not provide any further information
in reply to testing

I've used
https://www.handelsregister.de and searched for the HRB mentioned at https://mastodon.social/about with Register Court "Berlin(Charlottenburg)".

This company is really non-profit. It is created that way.

#MastodonIsNotForSale #gGmbH #MastodonGGMBH #gemeinnuetzig #NonProfit #LookAtTheHandelsregister #MastodonDotSocial #NoPanic #KeinePanik
Questa voce è stata modificata (1 anno fa)
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Maybe @Gargron should cap off an instance after 25 million users, then start a new instance @mastadon.social2, .social3, etc.
#SeparateButEqual
Let others on his team moderate their own social instance.

People need to leave Twitter in a jiffy, .social is the catch all. It will be lovely when all our toots can easily migrate with us to any instance/server instead of feeling like starting fresh.

Maybe I'll feel artsy for six months, maybe I'll want to nest in travel for two months...

nikol reshared this.

in reply to FediTips has moved!

Good heavens — how did mastodon.social suddenly become an evil menace, and Eugen some kind of villain? It seems to me you’ve spun out a dystopian fantasy of how things *might* go bad, and now you’re whipping up public alarm over that fantasy, *as though it were really happening*. But it’s not! The fediverse is growing and thriving. New communities are being spawned and existing ones are growing in reach and vitality. We can thank, among others, @Gargron for a lot of that.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Serious question: how is all the infrastructure paid? If the fediverse really should grow beyond a marginal point it will at some time require corporations that are willing to pour money into it - and get more money out of it. Plus a lot of people simply want to see corporate content from streamlined marketing agency's or just follow their favorite brands. As long as none of those happens the fediverse is in no "danger" to lose its niche status.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Another solution would be real competition from a server run by a huge player such as @mozilla, for instance. But no updates on that as far as I know.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Honestly, the app and joinmastodon should default to your nearest regional server with a dropdown listing other servers (regional servers can include which country, state/prov(opt), city(opt) they service in the backend).
And under that dropdown could be a list of tags of interests you could tap-to-check that would allow it to suggest interest-based servers (interest-based servers can include a list of interest tags).
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Can you recommend other servers? Looking for ones with a common-sense moderation policy that aren't over heavy-handed on free speech.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I think you might be underestimating how much of a defence being spread across multiple servers is.

If mastodon.social pulls anything, we *will* all block it, and more servers will spring up.

This is literally as per Eugen's design.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

That's only true if users are the product, but in this case they aren't. I have very little interest in which instance my account is on, I'm fairly sure not many others really do either.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

The bigger mastodon.social becomes, the more people are likely to use it.
Like it or not, most users don't care about the theoretical implications of using a technology; they care about the practical ones.
If users are afraid of centralization, then they can choose any other server.
If they don't care, then directing them to one main server is an excellent solution.
The people who disagree with this are just staunchly against centralization of any kind and want everyone to be like them
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I am very worried about this as well. Rochko's original idea of Mastodon was good, obviously, but what he's doing is making himself vulnerable to a buyout and fragmenting Mastodon's integrity. (And making only himself rich).

I do hope that accounts that have been on Mastodon Social for a while consider migrating to smaller, more personable instances.

If enough accounts migrate (as a continuous thing), it would keep the risk somewhat lower at least.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Any1 who’s dealt w/ Elon, or Jack on Twitter, should be on board making sure that .social doesn’t get so big some creep wants to buy it. We should be telling #newbies about it when they migrate before they’ve done a lot of posts that they could lose, they should look & see if a different instance would suit them better. If you’re concerned, talk to atleast one newbie a week! We can make a serious dent in this problem. #mastodon #Twitter #TwitterMigration
in reply to @pineywoozle

@Pineywoozle we originally started on mastodon.social, and we get why some people choose to go there. the local feed is always full of content. But in our mastodon journey, we've come to realize that it's not about the quantity of posts coming in each minute. it's about the level of actual, quality friendships/exchanges happen. smaller servers provide people more of an open starting point from our experiences, giving them room to choose their own way, 1/?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

A lot of the questions you asked were addressed in this interview over at The Verge https://www.theverge.com/23658648/mastodon-ceo-twitter-interview-elon-musk-twitter
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Seems like if the Fediverse can be so easily endangered, its value as a robust and resilient system was greatly exaggerated by its proponents
in reply to FediTips has moved!

QUESTION: What job lasts for life, allows corruption and decides on the fate of people of a nation, but is not royalty?

Answer: Supreme Court Justice.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

@sentient_water

I think the issue is legal ownership, rather than servers.

Cooperative ownership of many instances, where major decisions like selling or constitutional change have to be approved by super-majority vote, would be a stronger guarantee than just many instances privately owned or controlled by a small number of people.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I might be wrong, but this seems massively overblown and incorrect. Mastodon is a non-profit gGmbH. Selling to a VC or something alike would violate their non-profit status and they'd be getting into a lot of legal trouble in Germany. The change to the sign up seems to be the consequence of many users complaining about poor UX for people unfamiliar with the fediverse .
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Questions.

Is Mastodon.social nonprofit? Would this not preclude a purchase per the rules of pursuing profit in capitalism.

Could we not solve some of this via migration? I have four accounts. I don’t care which is dominant if I can figure out how to keep my network.

Has anyone brought this to the attention of the admin?

Blue sky is basically a Mastodon ripoff- per same wack profit rules they stole it, why also buy it?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I worry mastodon doesn’t seem to have a plan for enabling smaller instances to access tending posts on larger ones. I’ve set up multiple accounts so I can check out the “Posts” under “Explore” on each server. Even across the larger instances, they differ. Is there any effort to aggregate trending posts and their replies across all instances?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Definitely not my opinion:

In the end, you screw up with it anyways, because:

The bad girls/guys have fun, interesting challenges, profit, success stories, helping hands, power, energy, resources, incentives, motivation, ...

The good ones have children, Netflix, a partner and a job (and brutally dropped everything else on the way).
in reply to FediTips has moved!

once an entity which imagines itself dominant in this space tries to monetise that dominance their efforts to do so make instances they control less attractive to users. Being funded by very many small subscriptions will tend to keep operators honest and non manipulative.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

This didn’t happen with Wordpress. Why should we expect this to happen with Mastodon?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I think the danger comes from another direction.

Corporations like FB will run their own mastodon servers, offering better service than the current ones (like higher speed, unlimited space for pictures, videos etc., well-staffed hotline that really helps, ...). They can do that simply because they have money. In the next step, they'll add cool features which aren't open-source. After collecting enough users, they defederate, taking the users with them.

This has already happened once with XMPP where both Google and FB defederated, thereby taking encryption away from people (back then, encryption was implemented as a plugin on top of free chat clients which stopped working, forcing users to use the corporation-provided client).
in reply to FediTips has moved!

My previous Mastodon instance vanished. To this day I’ve been unable to learn what might have happened to it.

So I admit I am reluctant to leave my new instance, which seems larger and more reliable. Are there particular alternative instances that you recommend?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

it's going to have to result in a conversation with the people known as 'normies' or else the fascist regime shall continue
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Is there a step by step tutorial for switching instances? I've been putting it off...
in reply to FediTips has moved!

While I see your point, from a tax perspective, the "gGmbH" (a tax-exempt limited liability company under German law) would have been one of the worst legal forms to adopt. @Gargron would quite likely lose all tax privileges, retroactively, for a maximum of ten years.

Of course, everything has its price, so also this loss could be compensated.

https://www.winheller.com/gemeinnuetzigkeitsrecht/gemeinnuetzige-gmbh/verkauf-ggmbh-anteile.html
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I understand the concern, but it is alleviated (for me) by the fact that mastodon.social users can take their followers, lists, blocklist, etc. and go anywhere in the Fediverse. Many of those users left Twitter b/c of ownership.

If dot social gets sold and there’s any deterioration in service (like ads), who stays?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I understand your concerns, but Mastodon has the right to run its own public server, and it has the right to offer the use of that server to the users of its primary software product. True, a predominant server on the Fediverse could be in danger of being acquired by a corporation and be subject to the hegemony of the rest of the web, but they can't own the Fediverse, and that is by design. As long as they offer alternative servers (they do), I am cautiously okay with it.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

@youronlyone

For starters 'Fedi.Tips', I don't do #hellthreads, but just going by the timbre of your post I'm responding to here, I gotta say I'm pleasantly surprised.

I rarely boost anything of yours coz it usually sounds like you're a masto cheerleader instead of a Fediverse advocate - no offense, just my personal observation.

Second - it's exactly what Eugen wanted for his "Brand", and he's caused enormous damage by creating a deprecated, legacy monolithic silo.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Hence, we should #SpreadFediverse and constantly inform everyone that there is a world out there.

But how can we make people explore the fediverse when:

1. People falsely assume that #Mastodon is the #Fediverse / #ActivityPub. That's like saying #China is #Asia.

2. When something is lacking in Mastodon, people assume it is the Fediverse / ActivityPub that is lacking. That is like saying chicken is the worst food because you've tasted McDonald's chicken, when there #Jollibee's #ChickenJoy is tastier and juicier.

There are now even people who praise a non-fediverse network based on those false assumptions above. They have time to research a non-fediverse network, but doesn't have the time to do their due diligence about the Fediverse; all because they falsely assumed they've seen everything.

It's like moving to a new country, settling in a new home, exploring their new neighbourhood, and then assumed that village they're in is a representation of the entire country.

If we can make people see, and make people explore their own “city” and “country”, then maybe, just maybe, the distribution of people in the fediverse will start to balance between the different forks, projects, and instances. It won't happen overnight, but maybe we can plant the seeds.
in reply to Yohan Yuki Xieㆍ사요한・謝雪矢

counterpoint: what I can see is pretty limited, and seeing anything else is difficult by design. Normies do not care about how hard it is for the system to be taken over. The barrier to entry is presently too high to attract the non-enthusiasts that actually say interesting/funny stuff.

Community seems to be mostly people already invested in #fediverse rather than people who are only incidentally using the fediverse to create. Big difference

in reply to Luigi de Guzman

@youronlyone I’ve groused about this recently and the response I’ve gotten back is “change to a larger instance then.” So if that’s the solution, the largest instance will always win. Yay?
in reply to Luigi de Guzman

@ouij @youronlyone

If all someone cares about is convenience, why not just stay on Twitter? Why come to a decentralised network and demand that it centralise? It's like going to a vegetarian restaurant and complaining they don't serve meat.

The solution isn't "choose a larger instance", the solution is to discover people to follow through many different methods: https://fedi.tips/how-do-i-find-accounts-to-follow-on-mastodon-and-the-fediverse-how-do-i-find-my-friends/

And for admins, the solution is to use hashtag/instance relays: https://fedi.tips/using-relays-to-quickly-expand-a-servers-view-of-the-fediverse/

Questa voce è stata modificata (8 mesi fa)
in reply to FediTips has moved!

@ouij @youronlyone

The problems on Twitter, Facebook etc are a direct result of their structure, they inevitably "enshittify" because they are owned by a single company that will keep pushing to squeeze more and more revenue from a saturated market. They are incentivised to exploit their users in ever worse ways.

Yes this place is structurally less convenient, but it's the structure that keeps it from turning to crap like Twitter.

People have to choose their priorities.

in reply to FediTips has moved!

@youronlyone again, I’m here incidentally. The network exists and I figured I’d give it a shot. That is usually how these sorts of networks grow.

I am currently struggling to find things to follow. I appreciate the hard work you’ve been putting in to make that easier. But it’s not work most casual users will probably want to put in. And that’s going to affect who gets on and stays on the network.

in reply to Luigi de Guzman

@ouij @youronlyone

"But it’s not work most casual users will probably want to put in."

The methods I listed in the link above are not *that* difficult. They're the kind of thing people did online before Facebook etc existed.

I know it can take getting used to different ways of doing things, but once you're over that barrier it's pretty simple.

Even simple things that people have done for decades can seem difficult if you're not used to them:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHNEzndgiFI

in reply to FediTips has moved!

Because Twitter is run by a bad person who is using the platform to do bad things. It's perfectly reasonable to want both convenience and not support a transphobic white supremacist.
in reply to James Endicott

@o76923 @youronlyone @ouij

The reason Twitter is run by a bad person is precisely because of its simpler structure.

Putting an entire social network onto one instance means it can be very easily sold to anyone with money.

The same thing that makes it convenient is the same thing that makes it vulnerable to being taken over by Musk etc.

It's much harder for anyone to buy this place, because it's spread out on thousands of independently owned instances. The complicated structure protects us.

in reply to FediTips has moved!

Literally yesterday you were advocating for a feature that would make discovery easier/UX simpler for following others. On a technical level, it would require implementing changes that reduce incentives for centralization.

You demonstrably know that convenience isn't the same as centralization. I have no idea why you are bullying @ouij@tambayan.us for asking that the Fediverse be more convenient to use.

in reply to James Endicott

I'm not sure if "bullying" is an appropriate way to describe what I wrote? Was there some particular phrase I used that was inappropriate? Please do let me know if I am overstepping any marks.

I was responding to the section "What I can see is pretty limited, and seeing anything else is difficult by design. Normies do not care about how hard it is for the system to be taken over."

With this phrase, @ouij seemed to be asking for centralisation.

1/2

Questa voce è stata modificata (8 mesi fa)
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Non-techy people may think they don't care about how hard it is for a place to be taken over.

But they do care really, because we've seen the vast number of people unhappy with the behaviour of centralised social networks. That's why people are leaving Twitter.

The technical side of things and the effects of the technology are two sides of the same coin. You cannot have a centralised network that is safe from people like Musk.

2/2

Questa voce è stata modificata (8 mesi fa)
in reply to FediTips has moved!

@youronlyone @o76923 I wasn’t asking for centralization.

I observed that I have certain frustrations with the platform, and the advice I keep getting from other users boils down to “your instance is too small, join a bigger one.”

If that’s what solves my frustrations, then the biggest instance always wins.

in reply to Luigi de Guzman

@youronlyone @o76923 non-technical users do not care about the structure of a network. They care about the messages they can send and receive on it. And if those users have a hard time finding the things they want, they will not wait around to learn the intricacies of the network. They will just go idle or leave.
in reply to Luigi de Guzman

@youronlyone @o76923 the vibe I get from a lot of advocates then shifts to “well good riddance we don’t need them.”

The small size and insularity of this user base relative to the larger non-technical population makes that kind of hostility more likely.

in reply to Luigi de Guzman

@ouij @youronlyone @o76923

“well good riddance we don’t need them.”

That is the opposite of what I do.

I spend my spare time trying to help new people. I run this account, my other accounts and websites to help non-technical people get onto here.

"non-technical users do not care about the structure of a network. They care about the messages they can send and receive"

If what you say is true, why would they leave Twitter? I'm not trying to be facetious, I'm genuinely asking.

in reply to FediTips has moved!

@o76923 @youronlyone users are leaving twitter because their experience has deteriorated. Stuff they don’t like is propagated into their feed. Stuff they do like becomes harder to find. Their ability to access the network has been (rate-) limited. It sucks, and people decide not to tolerate an experience that sucks.

Is that a consequence of twitter’s structure? Maybe. But that’s not why people are leaving.

in reply to Luigi de Guzman

@youronlyone @o76923 so if the problem is “I have a hard time finding anything worth reading,” in a lot of cases the replies I get start sounding like “yeah and that’s a FEATURE.” I mean sure, maybe that keeps bad guys from taking over the network. But a poison pill isn’t much use if what you’re looking for is an apple to snack on.
in reply to Luigi de Guzman

@ouij @youronlyone @o76923

Could you give some specific examples?

I think this discussion would be clearer if we talked about specifics?

in reply to FediTips has moved!

@o76923 @youronlyone so, see here.

https://qoto.org/@volkris/110816915773094018

This is a helpful explanation about why my feed seems so dead, and I appreciate it. But to me it boils down to: your instance is too small, and your frustrations are by design!

That’s a benign message, but to a normie the takeaway is: you are being frustrated so the system is working as designed

in reply to Luigi de Guzman

@ouij @o76923 @youronlyone

"the instance doesn’t search all of fediverse for it, but only searches through the limited number of posts that have happened to be shared to that one instance that you’re on."

...that's because of the decentralised structure.

If you want every post on every instance to be searchable from every other instance, you are calling for centralisation.

This isn't a "poison pill", it's just a consequence of decentralisation.

in reply to FediTips has moved!

@ouij @o76923 @youronlyone

The technical costs of every instance trying to index all other posts on all other instances would be huge. Only megacorporations would be able to afford to run an instance.

However, there are ways for smaller servers to mitigate this using relays, especially relays based on tags:

https://fedi.tips/using-relays-to-quickly-expand-a-servers-view-of-the-fediverse/

in reply to FediTips has moved!

@youronlyone @o76923 so the upshot is to find another instance, I guess?

Again, this is useful but not to an end user that doesn’t run his own instance.

in reply to FediTips has moved!

@o76923 @youronlyone so once again: the system is Good because the user experience is Not Good.

I am utterly indifferent to centralization or decentralization. If there is a better way to find things/people I can read, I’ll do that.

in reply to Luigi de Guzman

No, you're not reading my response properly.

It is not a deliberate decision to restrict things. It's a downside of a system that has many upsides.

There are no 100% good and bad options, there are only "least worst" choices.

"I am utterly indifferent to centralization or decentralization. If there is a better way to find things/people I can read, I’ll do that."

If you are utterly indifferent to the causes of your problems, you will never solve your problems.

Questa voce è stata modificata (8 mesi fa)
in reply to FediTips has moved!

There are many easy-to-understand reasons why decentralisation is a good idea. These do not require technical knowledge to understand:

https://fedi.tips/why-is-the-fediverse-on-so-many-separate-servers/

Questa voce è stata modificata (8 mesi fa)
in reply to FediTips has moved!

@o76923 @youronlyone a good idea and a good experience are not the same thing.

Again: nobody ever got started posting on a network because they were intrigued by its structure.

in reply to Luigi de Guzman

@ouij @o76923 @youronlyone

It's not about being "intrigued by a structure", it's about being appreciative of the effects of the structure.

I am not particularly interested in house building and construction codes for their own sake, but I appreciate the work of builders and legislators when my house is warm in winter and it doesn't fall down.

in reply to FediTips has moved!

@o76923 @youronlyone in that case you have felt warm and dry, and so have benefited from the structure.

Imagine being told that you had to live in a stifling room or tolerate what seems to be a leaky roof because the structure demanded it

in reply to FediTips has moved!

@youronlyone @o76923 the upsides are diffuse and not relevant to what I want to do. The downside is discrete.

White cat, black cat—what’s the difference, so long as it catches mice

in reply to Luigi de Guzman

The upsides are very relevant to what you want to do, because they tell you whether the solution will be effective.

Global warming is very relevant to a farmer whose crop yields are threatened by climate change. A farmer can choose to ignore climate science because it seems "diffuse", but such a choice will not help them solve their crop problems.

If your problems are caused by something, ignoring the cause will not help.

Questa voce è stata modificata (8 mesi fa)
in reply to FediTips has moved!

@youronlyone @o76923 the practical takeaway is: I can only look for what is visible to my instance. So to solve that, I have to move to an instance that sees more. So users should join the biggest possible instance?

Again I am honestly trying to figure out why my feed seems so empty so I can break out what seems to be nothing but a feedback loop of fediverse self-congratulation

in reply to FediTips has moved!

What about having a central sign-up page that assigns new accounts to random instances throughout the Fediverse (specific ones could opt out)? That way, accounts would be spread around the Fediverse. (Let people choose one if they feel strongly about it). Then, afterwards once newbies are more settled, they could choose to move to another instance.
I don't really know how it all works, but maybe there is a seed of an idea here?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I currently have two accounts in the fediverse, neither one on that server.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

You may have to "limit" the growth of this server in some way in order to spread the growth of the other servers. I think people do not fully comprehend your model. It may be necessary to protect the community from these billionaire knuckleheads. Unsavory, yes, but there it is.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

When I first joined I stumbled on an infographic of instance sizes as circles of various sizes and it was helpful because to me this is a basically a 3 bears Goldilocks decision. Is there a current version of that somewhere?
Questa voce è stata modificata (1 anno fa)
in reply to FediTips has moved!

ultimately, if it gets bought by musk then people will leave and find a new platform again
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Helpful tip—been planning to move to a smaller instance but have feared the effort involved. Will try to do it in the next few weeks!
in reply to FediTips has moved!

oh absolutely, but there are things to be said about having a sort of "starting point" for newcomers to work from. If everyone was split equally across instances, way less people would join due to the overwhelming amount of options
Unknown parent

Berg Am Laimerin
@gebrauchskunst
Ist halt Quark. Da hat jemand nicht Verstanden, was eine gGmbH ist.
(Das erste "g" steht für "gemeinnützig", da kommt man nicht so einfach wieder raus.).
@Geku
in reply to FediTips has moved!

if it were easier to migrate to other instances instead of the long and convoluted process now in place, that might take the strain off the main instance-but it is difficult to change instances, and while there is a map of all of them available, some of them are not open to new users.
TL;DR: make it easier to move your home base to another.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

That’s bad faith. People reported that choosing a server was a big hurdle. I don’t see the problem in making it easier to join the broader experience and playing on advanced mode later. More services are good for federated sm, and if mastodon is the only one going forward, it’s not them to blame.
Unknown parent

Feoh🤓💾👁️
@trebach@z428 That's the beauty of open source! It's Eugen's bat and ball, and he can do whatever he wants with it, whether anybody likes it or not 😀

So if that happened and they forked, then the FLOSS model is working as advertised and we're all good 👍
Unknown parent

METADESTROYER !! (He/Him)
@mrhamel@Uraael isnt the solution to this not trying to centralize the system by the admins, and having people realize the nature of the fediverse and move servers? whats with the blaming the person trying to warn you of shit that happens all the time and trying to help figure out solutions?
Unknown parent

Ryan Hamel
@Uraael The point is blacklisting large providers means losing out on potential communication and it harms the users of that instance, due to that centralizes admins decisions. Instances would defederate mastodon.social, and then there will be instances who defederate others who defederate mastodon.social, creating blackholes or "islands" in a decentralized network.
in reply to METADESTROYER !! (He/Him)

@edendestroyer@Uraael
> not trying to centralize the system by the admins

Each instance has a centralized admin/mod team.

> having people realize the nature of the fediverse and move servers?

Not everyone wants to move servers all the time, but rather a stable and reliable server, like email providers.

> whats with the blaming the person trying to warn you of shit that happens all the time and trying to help figure out solutions?

This doesn't happen on mastodon.social 🙂
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I think this is a very alarmist approach and lacks a bit of nuances:
- Mastodon code doesn't get written by itself. It needs financing, and @Gargron is doing a great work to secure it;
- There is a good community involved on the development.
- The only thing keeping folk to use forks is the stability of the current code. If the FOSS nature of it changes, well, it is easy to jump boats.
- Mastodon gGmbH is a non-profit organization. Dunno if one can have personal gain by a sellout.
Unknown parent

Fish Id Wardrobe
@Natureshadow@gargron Well, perhaps he is, but if so it was pretty silly of him to create a system that is spectacularly resistant to monopoly, no?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Please stop spreading panic about the uncertain future of #fediverse, and blaming one of it's creators/platforms for the downfall.

If you know anything about the #openSource, is that it can't be bought.

The true danger comes from the #bigTech (closed) platforms joining fediverse.
They can (ab)use their money to attract more people to those platforms, than all of the open source platforms combined.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

it’s a bit too late at this point. People are tired of Mastodon’s quirks and are moving to other places like bluesky, in particular.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Maybe there is again a chance to point that Mastodon is not a whole Fediverse?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

☝️

No problem if mastdon.social were to be sold out -- we'll all just block the server!
in reply to FediTips has moved!

why don't the folks who run mastodon.social close it for new registrations? Then it wouldn't continue to grow disproportionately faster than the other instances. Why are they motivated to keep growing, despite it being an obvious risk for the reason you pointed out?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Maybe we need a trigger, bigger than x%, split until less than y%?
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I don't any danger to be honest. And defederating mastodon.social would imho be the worst thing, we could do.

Why?

Switching instances is easy. As long as mastodon.social is part of the federation, every user can switch to another pod and still keep in contact with all their peers.
If mastodon.social is defederated, people would (again) leave their peers behind, when they switch to another instance. A lot of them will not want to do that.
Keep mastodon.social federated and everyone who doesn't like, where it is going, can easily switch to somewhere else in their own pace.

Also: A lot of people who come from centralised plattforms like fb or Twitter, expect Mastodon to have a single point of entry. A lot of people are overwhelmed, when they have to select a pod first. I single, "official" platform helps them to get into the fediverse. And from there, they can start exploring. They can realise, that they are writing to people from other servers, learn about different communities, clients, etc.
And then, they can still switch to a place, that suits them better.
If we take that single point of entry from them, they will likely choose another social media, that is easier to get into and promises to be better than [whatever they used before].
in reply to FediTips has moved!

If the official/default app has to "recommend" a server for some reason, it should do so for the purpose of spreading users out, not piling them on one "preferred" server. (As far as I can tell so far with my limited experience, it makes no significant difference what server your account is on.)
in reply to SmashedRatOnPress

@SmashedRatOnPress actually, it makes a huge difference, what server you are on.
You can see posts of
* People you are following (independent from the server)
* People who are on the same server as you are
* People who are followed by people who are on the same server as you are.

That means, if you are on a server with a lot of people, the fediverse feels very alive. But if you set up your own server and don't know anyone who you can follow (yet), there will be nothing but a vast and silent emptiness.
If you are new to the fediverse, it is very useful to be either on a very full server or on a server with people who have a lot in common with you. That makes it easy to find interesting people. And you can take that contacts with you, if you decide to migrate to a smaller server later on.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

Avviso contenuto: meta

in reply to FediTips has moved!

It's science fiction sceario, but even so… what can we do in this case? We can simply move to another instance, and ask Mr Melon if he want to buy our accounts again.
in reply to FediTips has moved!

I wish you wouldn't create serialized hellthreads.

Have you tried moving to another, more capable platform that can accomodate your posts? The one you're on cannot - that's for sure.

And who cares what happens to mastotron .social anyway? It's just a deprecated, monolithic silo that has outlived its usefulness. Just block that instance and move on - away from all of that #November Rain trash left over from the initial #twitugees that returned to Twitter now that the big freakout ended up anything to nothing at all when Elon took out the trash.

in reply to FediTips has moved!

1) not going to happen since anyone can spawn a new instance so the barrier to entry is very low
2) the instance model is the wrong model (that's a flaw of the current design) since it facilitates centralization within a decentralized network
in reply to FediTips has moved!

But you might be missing the value proposition for that theoretical buyer.

They wouldn’t buy the instance without some value that makes the purchase worthwhile to them, and the ability for users to move to other instances should they provide a poor experience after the purchase is yet more reason that they wouldn’t make the purchase for bad reasons.

On the other hand, if a VC buys a major instance and provides a better experience for users, well more power to them!

A purchase is not necessarily a bad thing.
A purchase can also provide resources and leadership that can work for users too.

Unknown parent

FediTips has moved!

@ouij @youronlyone

"if you don’t like it/don’t get it GTFO)."

That would indeed be a terrible attitude, and absolutely NOT what I am saying. Apologies if that's how I came across, I didnt intend to give off that kind of vibe.

I'm just saying is a lot of the difficulty is from getting used to something different (like the teenagers and the dial phone). It isn't impossible to learn, and once you do learn it can become second nature.