Salta al contenuto principale


Remember when “social media” was “social networking”?

What changed? That second word: media. It’s all about capturing your attention and selling you stuff.

Humans are social and want to connect with one another. That’s what makes the #fediverse special to me - authentic connection. We haven’t forgotten the social part.

in reply to Andy Piper

I think the word "Media" was tacked on as an alternative to "Networking", networking sounds like some sort of business venture, which is usually a turn off for most people, whereas "Media" means you might get a Meme of Pepe the frog.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepe_the…
in reply to dick_turpin

@dick_turpin
I consider Networking a technical term, and Media a commercial term. And our connotation is with 'broadcasting' and 'publishing' which it lends from traditional media we're familiar with.

The marketing was "giving everyone a voice".. by turning them publishers.

Less focus on all the much more difficult use cases of fostering real human connection between people who are remote to each other, and through the narrow social bandwidth of twisted copper and glassfibre wires.

in reply to Andy Piper

I remember when it was “social software”. Software that’s useful and made more useful by data from others.
in reply to Tom Morris

@tommorris yes. Flickr was "social photo sharing". Last.FM was "social music". Back in Web 2.0 when things became more interactive and social components were added to things.
in reply to Andy Piper

@tommorris I wrote an outline for a book that was going to be titled "Social Everything", somewhere around 2010 ish; obviously, I was too lazy to actually write it.
in reply to Andy Piper

the main thing that changed is that logo accounts and algorithmic feeds were introduced. Because it turns out much more ads can be shown to you if you have an endless stream of content from strangers and meme pages and celebrities and influencers.
in reply to Andy Piper

I think only Japan (and surrounding countries) sticked with it until now but termed as SNS instead.
in reply to Andy Piper

I've been thinking about this a lot lately I will likely write a blog post about it sometime in the future. It seems that a lot of people just want to put out content instead of interacting with other people and I find that extremely disappointing.
in reply to Andy Piper

it's so cool the lack of politicians and businesses. What i hate about the fediverse ia memes. Fortunatly i can block them
in reply to Andy Piper

I’m just catching up on my feed over a late lunch and have to say that I agree. I’ve just spoted something to LinkedIn about it in response to someone saying they’d had enough of all of the nonsense there.
in reply to Andy Piper

Social media has turned to entertainment media over the years. (no real bad feelings about it, it was A slow pivot in my point of view)
in reply to Andy Piper

I remember when we called them 'advertising platforms'. The fact that they persuaded journalists to refer to them as 'social media' was a very impressive piece of marketing.
in reply to Andy Piper

What happened to Clay Shirky? Anyone remember his definition "Social software is stuff that gets spammed.”

Of course the original link dies at CloudFlare calling on a sifting of the internet Archive (bless the Srchive! bless and support the Archive!) for the source

web.archive.org/web/2020120221…

in reply to Andy Piper

@cogdog As you implied Alan, it was "social software" back in 2003-04. I liked that term, although it was too geeky for the non-blogging population.
in reply to Andy Piper

Along with "it's not information overload, it's filter failure."

That has aged well.

in reply to Andy Piper

I loved Twitter in the early days when it was just people talking to each other. Same with Instagram, sharing photos with friends / family. Then it all became brands and marketing and politics and algorithms and gross. Coming to the fediverse was like taking a time machine to the good old days.
Questa voce è stata modificata (1 mese fa)
in reply to Andy Piper

Before it was "social" anything it was just online community. I hate instagram but have built so much of a community on there, and I haven't figured out how to migrate it off just yet. I suspect I'll need to build it myself, or one-by-one guide my friends somewhere else.
in reply to Andy Piper

Media is the plural of medium, "so called because it is neither rare nor well done."
in reply to Andy Piper

The big tech platforms provide "social control media".

Some (like #Techrights) argue that Mastodon instances, and any other social application that allowa server side enforcing of codes of conduct, fall into that category. I would argue that the right to join a gated community is more "self control" than "social control", but I prefer self filtering over server filtering.

in reply to Andy Piper

or the network part. We see not only what our friends post, but also what they boost; and very often what they boost will be the posts of people whose views resonate with our own — friends whom we have not yet encountered.

The thing which makes #Mastodon (and the whole #ActivityPub ecosystem) so good is that it does the network part so well.

Andy Piper reshared this.

in reply to Andy Piper

My definition of social networking is: Any direct and indirect human interaction between people.

Social media then is a particular set of social networking use cases where people publish content to other people to interact with in a variety of ways.

in reply to Andy Piper

💯 I try to be intentional about not using “social media” and using “social network” instead for this very reason. When you describe something as “social media” to someone they focus on the “media” part and expect that kind of experience.
in reply to Andy Piper

Als Späteinsteiger kenn ich noch Foren und kleine Chats. Dann kamen die großen Netzwerke, und dann die globalen Netzwerke. Und vorbei war es mit Netzwerk vertrauter Personen. Eingesogen in den Sumpf kommerzieller Interessen.