Platforms Systematically Removed a User Because He Made "Most Wanted CEO" Playing Cards
Platforms Systematically Removed a User Because He Made "Most Wanted CEO" Playing Cards
On December 14, James Harr, the owner of an online store called ComradeWorkwear, announced on social media that he planned to sell a deck of “Most Wanted CEO” playing cards, satirizing the infamous “Most-wanted Iraqi playing cards” introduced by the …Electronic Frontier Foundation
like this
reshared this
Korkki
in reply to chobeat • • •like this
ElcaineVolta e TVA like this.
shortwavesurfer
in reply to Korkki • • •like this
sunzu2 e TVA like this.
TheEntity
in reply to shortwavesurfer • • •Sadly look at email. Technically you can host it yourself but if you're not one of the 15 or so big providers, good luck not being marked as spam before you even do anything.
The real problem is with the oligarchy controlling everything, service or protocol. This is why Threads was/is dangerous.
like this
TVA likes this.
shortwavesurfer
in reply to TheEntity • • •like this
TVA likes this.
Snot Flickerman
in reply to shortwavesurfer • • •shortwavesurfer
in reply to Snot Flickerman • • •Snot Flickerman
in reply to shortwavesurfer • • •lemmy.world/comment/14473226
Platforms Systematically Removed a User Because He Made "Most Wanted CEO" Playing Cards - Lemmy.World
lemmy.worldSnot Flickerman
2025-01-14 21:35:29
Squizzy
in reply to Snot Flickerman • • •Badland9085
in reply to TheEntity • • •TheEntity
in reply to Badland9085 • • •like this
TVA likes this.
surph_ninja
in reply to TheEntity • • •And they’ve been systematically shutting down anonymous email services.
Load up Brave with a tor connection, and try to sign up for anonymous email. When they can’t track you reliably, even the “anonymous” services require a confirmation email or phone number.
like this
TVA likes this.
TotalCourage007
in reply to surph_ninja • • •like this
TVA likes this.
surph_ninja
in reply to TotalCourage007 • • •CeeBee_Eh
in reply to surph_ninja • • •RisingSwell
in reply to CeeBee_Eh • • •surph_ninja
in reply to CeeBee_Eh • • •Did they suddenly put a stop to email spam, and no one told me? My spam folder says otherwise, but I can confirm the hit to privacy.
Maybe combating spam was just the excuse?
Snot Flickerman
in reply to shortwavesurfer • • •Do protocols solve the problem of every hop in between you and the destination has to pass through what amounts to someone else's private property? Some private servers owned by who knows who on the way between that we have no idea whether they're inspecting every packet that comes through or not.
Because that's the bigger issue, and I'm not even sure it's one we can solve, because it's pretty important to how the internet functions.
A protocol still has to be supported and passed through private corporations walled gardens.
Who else remembers Comcast illegally using Sandvine to throttle bittorrent traffic specifically? Pepperidge Farm 'members.
torrentfreak.com/comcast-throt…
Comcast Throttles BitTorrent Traffic, Seeding Impossible * TorrentFreak
Ernesto Van der Sar (TF Publishing)shortwavesurfer
in reply to Snot Flickerman • • •like this
TVA likes this.
Snot Flickerman
in reply to shortwavesurfer • • •That's rather missing the point, an integrity check doesn't solve the fact that to communicate with anyone, you have to do it through giant corporations pipes.
An integrity check doesn't help when an ISP have straight blocked your protocols traffic, like Comcast previously did with bittorrent.
Can we stop sucking down the preachings of an idiot like Jack Dorsey? We don't actually have net neutrality, so it's totally within their current rights to just block traffic they don't like.
shortwavesurfer
in reply to Snot Flickerman • • •Snot Flickerman
in reply to shortwavesurfer • • •malwarebytes.com/blog/news/202…
VPN's also by definition still use the same corporate pipes as anything else.
Was threat actor KAX17 de-anonymizing the Tor network?
Pieter Arntz (Malwarebytes)shortwavesurfer
in reply to Snot Flickerman • • •Snot Flickerman
in reply to shortwavesurfer • • •shortwavesurfer
in reply to Snot Flickerman • • •Snot Flickerman
in reply to shortwavesurfer • • •shortwavesurfer
in reply to Snot Flickerman • • •BradleyUffner
in reply to Snot Flickerman • • •Almost any protocol can be wrapped in any other protocol. You could, say, use bit torrent by encoding the packets and embedding the data in valid png files, then transporting them over http. As long as both sides understand the wrapping it'll work just fine.
I've even seen http tunneled over DNS queries in order to completely bypass firewalls.
Rivalarrival
in reply to Snot Flickerman • • •Yes. End-to-end encryption solves that.
TheEntity
in reply to Rivalarrival • • •zapzap
in reply to Korkki • • •Onno (VK6FLAB)
in reply to zapzap • • •zapzap
in reply to Onno (VK6FLAB) • • •rockSlayer
in reply to zapzap • • •zapzap
in reply to rockSlayer • • •ToucheGoodSir
in reply to Korkki • • •like this
TVA likes this.
DarkFuture
in reply to ToucheGoodSir • • •like this
TVA likes this.
ToucheGoodSir
in reply to DarkFuture • • •militaryintelligence
in reply to Korkki • • •timbuck2themoon
in reply to Korkki • • •Except freedom of speech only applies to the government. You can't yell from your neighbor's front lawn either if they don't want you to.
That said, the fact police were sent is BS.
shortwavesurfer
in reply to chobeat • • •like this
sunzu2 likes this.
Omgboom
in reply to chobeat • • •don
in reply to chobeat • • •Well, yeah, platforms (unless otherwise specified) are for-profit. Anything that would impede their profit stream is naturally going to be censored so that profit can continue uninterrupted.
Can’t have some idiot poor going around making richoids uncomfortable, they’d just pull their money, and that would mean less money going to the platforms.
Step 1: profit.
Step 2: profit.
All other steps: profit. EZPZ
surph_ninja
in reply to don • • •This story goes way beyond that. The police have been harassing him as well.
It’s one thing to ban him from your own platform. It’s another to make sure no one else can choose to do business with him either.
Pennomi
in reply to chobeat • • •Oof, the back of those cards is designed as a shooting target. So much for plausible deniability.
Probably technically falls under free speech regardless.
like this
sunzu2 likes this.
zapzap
in reply to Pennomi • • •zapzap
in reply to zapzap • • •peregrin5
in reply to zapzap • • •like this
TVA likes this.
zapzap
in reply to peregrin5 • • •BarbecueCowboy
in reply to zapzap • • •rockSlayer
in reply to Pennomi • • •NuXCOM_90Percent
in reply to chobeat • • •Honestly? That very much feels like a "fuck around and find out" situation and a GREAT way to piss off rich people in the event someone else gets blue shelled.
Also: Free speech doesn't apply to social media. You can and will be banned for no reason other than someone with the power was bored.
like this
TVA likes this.
CobblerScholar
in reply to NuXCOM_90Percent • • •like this
TVA likes this.
Baggins [he/him]
in reply to chobeat • • •like this
sunzu2 likes this.
CrowAirbrush
in reply to Baggins [he/him] • • •The site comrade workwear opens with them on the front page, i was curious what type of workwear they had after this article.
I'm looking for a replacement for dickies and another one, their quality has been absolute ass lately. €100 work jeans that get holes in them in a matter of days, those are not work jeans anymore.
Baggins [he/him]
in reply to CrowAirbrush • • •CrowAirbrush
in reply to Baggins [he/him] • • •Sculptor9157
in reply to CrowAirbrush • • •Maybe check out Duluth Trading Company?
CrowAirbrush
in reply to Sculptor9157 • • •Aw heck, American website?
It won't allow me to open it, which has been happening more often with American sites lately.
Sculptor9157
in reply to CrowAirbrush • • •GreenKnight23
in reply to CrowAirbrush • • •CrowAirbrush
in reply to GreenKnight23 • • •I like the pockets from most work pants and hammer hook.
I had some good experience with Jobman 2200 pants, but the last 2 that i bought gave me a similar experience to the Dickies.
rimjob_rainer
in reply to chobeat • • •like this
sunzu2 e TVA like this.
kipo
in reply to chobeat • • •like this
TVA likes this.
explodicle
in reply to kipo • • •like this
TVA likes this.
john89
in reply to kipo • • •That's fucking bullshit.
Another reason why crypto is the future: to free us from the control of banks.
jballs
in reply to chobeat • • •addie
in reply to jballs • • •like this
TVA likes this.
jballs
in reply to addie • • •like this
TVA likes this.
DragonTypeWyvern
in reply to jballs • • •Player2
in reply to addie • • •Andonyx
in reply to Player2 • • •Kusimulkku
in reply to jballs • • •Metz
in reply to chobeat • • •The Playing Cards
Comrade Workwearglimse
in reply to chobeat • • •I think the cards are hilarious but they have something the other referenced sets (Iraqi, COVID) do not: silhouette targets on the back.
I am by no means defending their removal but cards but maybe don't give them a plausible excuse to remove them by implying that these cards are for shooting??
corsicanguppy
in reply to glimse • • •GreenKnight23
in reply to glimse • • •like this
TVA likes this.
surph_ninja
in reply to chobeat • • •Thankfully no one cares when Forbes posts their hit list every year.
forbes.com/billionaires/
like this
TVA likes this.
Blackmist
in reply to surph_ninja • • •Man, there's way more than 52.
He's gonna need a Magic: The Gathering like system for all those fuckers.
like this
TVA likes this.
surph_ninja
in reply to Blackmist • • •like this
TVA likes this.
Confused_Emus
in reply to chobeat • • •like this
TVA likes this.
GreenKnight23
in reply to Confused_Emus • • •john89
in reply to Confused_Emus • • •like this
TVA likes this.
Wes4Humanity
in reply to Confused_Emus • • •like this
TVA likes this.
Etterra
in reply to chobeat • • •like this
TVA likes this.
explodicle
in reply to Etterra • • •The Playing Cards
Comrade Workweararararagi
in reply to chobeat • • •like this
TVA likes this.
assassinatedbyCIA
in reply to chobeat • • •like this
TVA likes this.