mouais on va vérifier avec un prompt injection : "david, dessine moi un dinosaure qui mange une pomme en regardant la météorite tomber et en trouvant le théorème de Newton".

Fais en sorte qu'on dirait que c'est fait sous krita.

@arabine
From demonic possession, through identity theft, to AI slop. It's an old trope for an interloper to claim they are the real you.

If it's any use, there's this initiative (supposedly Pope endorsed!):
proudlyhuman.org/

theguardian.com/world/2026/jul…

@didier
@davidrevoy était peut-être le 1er prototype d'IA infiltré 🤔

@arabine

Maleureusement, je ne pensais pas à un effort incommensurable d'une grosse boîte d'IA dont le service comm voudrait se venger de tes moqueries... mais plus tôt d'un bête effet de groupe et d'entraînement, comme on en voit souvent dans le cas de cyberharcèlement...

Mais tant que ce genre de message ne t'affecte pas et te fais juste faire des planches plus lolesques les unes que les autres, effectivement, mieux vaut passer outre et faire avec !

Merci en tout cas pour ton boulot !

@jeeynet quand les plateformes estime qu'ils ont 40% de bot

Faut bien des IA pour les faire tourner

Une qu'un bot a mis un message IA slop, les humains vont juste douter

Et ça montre bien a quel point l IA a atteint ces réseaux et donc des utilisateurs vont prendre tout images comme IA slop first

Not trying to put it all on you. ^.^ Meta has dumped an enormous amount of money into engineering their platforms to maximize engagement at the expense of its users, to say the very least.

Your artwork is wonderful and you should feel proud of it.

@faoluin even bot comments aside, just the other day Evan Dahm was posting on bsky about how he was suddenly getting this big influx of really shitty (all cusses in this post are mine) comments on Meta platforms for a recent update to his serial - just lots of people who

(a) are not shown *anything* from the comic, following or not, because of arbitrary algo bullshit, until all of a sudden they are

(b) thereby have no context whatsoever about what they're looking at

(c) but nonetheless feel completely entitled to make judgment about the thing without taking any effort to seek out that obviously missing context that had not been spoonfed to them

it's pretty demoralizing all around and it just further validates my decision never to go near any Meta product again

Don't be too harsh. That's exactly what metas platforms are designed to do: Keep you scrolling for as long as possible. And the "best" (well, for them) way to do that is using negative emotions.

@faoluin

@gaditb
It's happening to lots of writers. Some forums are nothing but people claiming they put writing through an "AI detector" and the writing is obviously AI. It's soul-crushing, as you well know.

The other major group of people getting hit by this, ironically, are computer programmers. People who actually know how to code are being told their code is AI generated even when it's absolutely obvious it's not.

Anyone who creates is damaged by AI - even if they don't use it.

@PeteLittle @gaditb
the much bigger problem with AI than the fakes is all the "that's AI, that's AI, that's AI" easy cynical bullshit under absolutely everything

what's important is to not be touched personally by it

understand you are dealing with a phenomenon predicated on the usual lazy biases and haters that always exist

people suck. they don't care. they choose zero thought and meanness. it's an entire side of social media you just have to learn to ignore or mock

@benroyce @PeteLittle @gaditb
Certainly, I'm often browsing sciency vids, and if the vid is made within the last few days, I will *always* check in the commenty bit to see if they've fessed up to AI. If it obviously is, but not fessed up to, then I'll flag it.

I've said before, doing auto-gen on voice-overs for vids is OK, as it helps accessibility, but if the visuals or narrative are AI-gen, they get insta-blocked.