Salta al contenuto principale


Today we're sharing the first in a series of three posts from our leadership team, starting with @mellifluousbox discussing our mission, and priorities for 2026. Stay tuned this week for more.

blog.joinmastodon.org/2026/02/…

in reply to Mastodon

"The Mastodon project is planning a global redesign to improve usability and discovery across the next software versions."

Would be helpful, if you could please elaborate on this or give an example for a better understanding?

in reply to Mastodon

"We are also forming an interdisciplinary age-verification working group, to help us navigate the complex nature of these international laws."

um go fuck yourselves??? what the fuck is this bullshit?????

in reply to Mastodon

Sounds like a lot of hard work! I especially like this: "we’re forming and founding an EU-based non-profit parent entity to ensure #Mastodon stays European forever."

#EuropeanAlternatives #EU

in reply to Mastodon

youtube.com/watch?v=d3xn2IlqPb…
in reply to Mastodon

The part about age-verification is very concerning. Attempting to push "face-scan" or id-requirement would send everyone out of your main instance, but there are two less damaging ways to age-check if you end up really needing to implement it:

* Valve's approach using credit cards to comply where is required (let the banks verify ages)
* Finding exceptions in the law for your organization/platform not needing it (like the Unredacted non-profit on the US)

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 giorni fa)
in reply to Mastodon

We need better processes to hold biased admins/mods to account. Eg

* Mandatory transparency on account limiting, suspension and post removal

* GDPR compliance especially subject access requests

* Public statistics on compliance with the above, including timelinesss

* Referral to independent user-nominated moderators for adjudication with binding decisions

* Code of conduct which codifies the Jerusalem Declaration on #antisemitism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerusale…

in reply to Mastodon

This sounds very nice. 😊

"Second, we’re forming and founding an EU-based non-profit parent entity to ensure Mastodon stays European forever."

in reply to Mastodon

Fuck your age verification plans. Don’t be fooled #FaceScan and ID laws are not here to protect children, they are here to enable more #surveillance and #fascist ideologies.

privacyguides.org/articles/202…

rockpapershotgun.com/good-news…

Fuck that noise! Fuck giving shitheads like Thiel personal information handed to them on a silver platter. #mastodon #oligarchy #privacy #enshittification

in reply to Mastodon

"we’re forming and founding an EU-based non-profit parent entity to ensure Mastodon stays European forever"

"staying European forever" might not strike everyone as the Unalloyed Good Thing you seem to think it is 🌏 🌍

also, "my fellow directors will share more information about their plans" has more than a whiff of the patrician and (worse) *proprietorial* about it
#languagematters

but hey
have fun, it's *your* playground...

in reply to Mastodon

Wow! We can't wait to be working with you through 2026 and helping Mastodon achieve its mission 🧡
in reply to Mastodon

Thanks! Having in-app donations for the official #Mastodon app is long overdue! Also extenstions will be a nice addition, & hopefully the #Fediverse platforms overall will embrace it (it helped make #WordPress popular).

The Age Verification should should also be an extension as well (one better left up to a reputable third party). Not all sites will need it yet—but with 𝕏 causing controversy (with kids & AI) I am not surprised governments are pushing for this.

in reply to Mastodon

If Mastodon implements age verification, we leave.
in reply to aria

@ariarhythmic My guess is that this will depend on your admin to enable? Probably won't affect smaller servers, but I am not a lawyer.

Either way, I think it's good that the Mastodon team is looking into all the legal requirements around this, and other relevant laws, rather than leaving each individual server admin to figure this out on their own.

@aria
Questa voce è stata modificata (2 giorni fa)
in reply to Stefan Bohacek

@stefan @ariarhythmic "Every instance for themselves" would be really bad for a set of services which heavily promote decentralization, yeah. It shifts the goalposts to fewer organizations who have the resources to navigate legal (and other) requirements.
in reply to Stu

@tehstu Absolutely!

On that note, I really like the approach fediverse has taken when it comes to decentralization. It started with that, and now we can explore ways we can pool resources and share responsibilities, and everything is optional.

The Atmosphere on the other hand pretty much started off fully centralized, and seeing some of the conversations around the ongoing efforts to increase the decentralization, things are already looking a bit rough in terms of how the user experience is impacted.

This is going to be very interesting to watch develop more in the upcoming months.

@Stu
in reply to aria

@ariarhythmic
the problem isn't mastodon it's your govt

if mastodon servers don't implement age verification in those jurisdictions that make it law, those servers get shut down by that govt

so you're blaming the wrong entity

are you really asking servers to face legal punishment and then get shut down anyway?

don't get me wrong: be angry

*at your govt*

not mastodon

@aria
Questa voce è stata modificata (2 giorni fa)

webhat reshared this.

in reply to aria

@ariarhythmic @benroyce
Your definition may of course vary, but if age-check in itself is fascism, it becomes hard to run any community or society where people don't know a lot about each other by other means.

(Eg. a small town pub where "everybody knows your name".)

The question of fascism comes up when we start talking about how the age-check is made, and what other information gets shared in addition to age. Or how that age-check can be misused, even in theory.

in reply to Juho Mäntysalo

@iju @ariarhythmic
looking at the emoji in aria's profile, not knowing if they are trans, but if they are i understand why they feel threatened by id checks

if i were trans i would feel intensely threatened, physically, mortally, by id checks

especially in countries like my like stupid fucking country (the usa)

at the same time:

if i *really* cared about id checks, i wouldn't be attacking the wrong entity

aria's heart is in the right place but their brain is AWOL

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce @ariarhythmic
Yeah, I noticed the emoji, and I do understand they're problably really raw about the developments of the past few years. Particularly if they're in the States.

Opposing fascism is really healthy! I'm just concerned that jumping the gun with the GmbH leads to being ignored when sensible applications of age-checks (and what happens if you don't participate) are done.

This seems paramount.

in reply to Juho Mäntysalo

@iju @ariarhythmic
i have a better idea:

do what valve does

you need a credit card

they run a $0 authorization

*no id docs needed*

the server doesn't deal with sensitive data

even better:

now your cc is attached to your mastodon profile

your cc is right there for donating to the server later

as more people should be doing

snag:

germany doesn't consider a cc legally acceptable

but other jurisdictions do

gamingonlinux.com/2025/08/stea…

@Mastodon @MastodonEngineering @Gargron

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce @iju @ariarhythmic @MastodonEngineering @Gargron i think they are discussing that they may have to perform verification on their own servers: mastodon.social. I don’t think they can enforce verification on other servers.
in reply to meowki

@meowki @iju @ariarhythmic @MastodonEngineering @Gargron

My understanding is that they will be making the software updates available to other servers that are also forced to comply or get shut down. Is my understanding wrong? It could be

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic

1. Mastodon's code already includes a setting which server admins can enable to set a minimum age for their server, which will ask for a date of birth to be entered during sign-up. The date of birth is not stored, only checked once. This has been part of Mastodon's code since multiple months now: github.com/mastodon/mastodon/p…

2. What they say in the blog is that they will audit the GmbH's own servers, which probably includes an audit of this feature.

3. The interesting stuff is what that "working group" will come up with.

in reply to Niko Trimmel

@nitrml @benroyce @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic Age verification won't, of course, stop someone from setting up their own server.

... which, at least regarding the federation choices this little node will be making... Is enough of its own age-gating process that we will welcome all nodes regardless of age of their admins. 😉

in reply to Mark T. Tomczak

@mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic

which is great of you, thank you

...and your stance is dependent upon the legalities of your jurisdiction

so people who do enable the age verification are not assholes, they just don't want their govt coming after them

and your own govt may change its mind, then you have to think about it

the problem is govt

not mastodon admins

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic Shutting down is also an option. I could not in good conscience run anything that asks for ID. If I owned a store I would refuse to carry age restriced products for the same reason.
in reply to LukefromDC

@LukefromDC @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic

what do you think about my post above asking for a credit card?

it achieves the same effect, and no one is getting a credit card without id. no server is getting your id and the security hassle with that, and you're not revealing your id anymore than it already has been

the big benefit: with your cc already attached to your profile, donating to your server becomes a breeze. and more people should be doing that

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic Some do not have or want credit cards and will simply use other servers.

There is no way any regime can shut down access to every non-agr verification compliant server. Limits on federation woulf just split the fediverse into two networks which would inevitanly be bridged back together.

FL cannot even stop Pornhub: they just block conmections from FL IP addresses and gladly take Tor and VPN traffic

in reply to LukefromDC

@LukefromDC @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic

you mean tor and VPN providers that spy on the people who use it because anyone using that it is flagging their activity as sensitive?

tor was started at the us naval research laboratory for dissidents in countries unfriendly to the usa

you think they don't have enough exit nodes to see what is going on?

and mastodon needs support

i'd almost (i said almost) support the idea of mandatory ccs on sign up with or without id laws

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 giorni fa)
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic .onion access bypasses exit nodes enrirely. If Tor gets compromised dozens of nations find their intelligence services lose covert communication except by direct radio or sattelite. If civilian traffic is blocked or driven off, spy traffic then instantly stands out.

Too many armies need Tor to kill it

in reply to LukefromDC

@LukefromDC @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic

.onion doesn't use exit nodes but it uses rendezvous nodes

and nobody wants to kill tor, the intelligence services love it

the foolishness is people who think something built by the us govt is perfectly anonymous

it *is* anonymous. to most every other entity

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic Perfect security would require our own hardware down to our own fabs making our own silicon. Then we'd have to bridge a new protocol we own over clearnet on the model of the US Government's own SIPRNET classified comms network.

It's easy enough to tell who I am by my writing style. Things like Tor let my bypass censors more than hide who I am.

in reply to LukefromDC

@LukefromDC @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic

understood

but we're now very far away from your average normie who just wants to see cat pictures

and that's where this topic truly lies

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 giorni fa)
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic Indeed so. Totally different needs and it goes both ways. An activist video server for instance could not handle doing 10x its bandwidth in cat videos, a server optimized for easy use to poat cat videos might not be safe going forward for posting videos of police brutality.

As different as a cruise ship and a destroyer, a Cessna and a Spitfire.

in reply to LukefromDC

@LukefromDC @mark @nitrml @meowki @iju @ariarhythmic

100%

and that's why we can't do purity tests on resistance

purity tests destroy effective resistance

effective resistance that isn't pure is not a betrayal

we resist how we can, in the ways we can

this isn't an argument against your words, i'm just harking back to the argument up higher

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 giorni fa)
in reply to aria

@ariarhythmic @benroyce Anybody that wants to operate their business in a country has to abide by the laws of that country. It's why Proton has been subpoened and had to hand over logs. It's the whole reason Signal collects as little data as possible, so they don't have anything to give but can still obey court orders. The alternative is for them to just leave that country entirely and abandon users who live there.
in reply to Marcus Adams

@gerowen @ariarhythmic
toxic idealists don't listen

they barge in, make impossible purity demands, then get angry and call us the enemy just because we live in reality

effective resistance is having a big heart. *and* having a brain. know when to fight. know when to scram if it's a suicide mission or ineffective

toxic idealists harm the left

they poison our convos with impotent anger and brittle perfectionism, stifling effective resistance and not offering shit

in reply to maya_b 🇨🇦

@maya_b @gerowen @ariarhythmic
it's so prevalent and so obvious it has to be a psyop from the right

of course some people are just that foolish

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce @maya_b @gerowen @ariarhythmic I spend more time than I’d like pondering this. Is it not obvious that to win, we must form coalitions of people who font 100% agree on every issue, or are there a ton of fake personas online focused on dividing the left?
in reply to aswack

@swacknificent @maya_b @gerowen @ariarhythmic
well there is division on the right too

the problem is that gets all papered over because they have a huge brainwashed mindless MAGA cult

division is inescapable. division is normal

it's just in our current time the natural (and unnatural) division on the left vs the manufactured unity on the right based on appeals to the bigotry that has always been with us, all funded by plutocrat controlled media, is a huge problem

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 giorno fa)
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce @swacknificent @maya_b @gerowen @ariarhythmic this is bullshit. Racism is not manufactured by plutocrats. It has dominated Western culture for centuries before Adolf Hitler was born. It heavily infests the US left as well.
in reply to Jones Murphy

@jonesmurphy @swacknificent @maya_b @gerowen @ariarhythmic
i apologize for the misunderstanding

bigotry has always been with us

i would say that with social media and right wing media they have been doing gangbusters uniting the bigots in political cohesion like never before

i edited my comment to be more clear

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 giorno fa)
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce @swacknificent @maya_b @gerowen @ariarhythmic no. I remember when conservatives united to repeatedly beat, arrested and shot at MLK. I remember the day they succeeded when he was 39 yrs old. There's nothing happening here that wasn't far worse back in them good old days a$$holes(not brainwashed ppl) call #MAGA.
Questa voce è stata modificata (1 giorno fa)
in reply to Jones Murphy

@jonesmurphy @swacknificent @maya_b @gerowen @ariarhythmic
again i completely agree with you

but also then plenty of these fuckwit bigots were in the democratic party while the racist dixiecrats were still busy migrating to the GOP

and there's still bigots in the democrats today

but the political unity of the GOP as the party of bigots is now a much stronger signal

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 giorno fa)
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce @swacknificent @maya_b @gerowen @ariarhythmic yes, the GOP is far less diverse. But its diversity is increasing fast. 25% of Trump's voters were nonwhite, a new GOP high since the Great Depression. I don't know that that means disunity. They are united around Nazi eugenics. There's a LOT of self-loathing among PoC unfortunately, particularly non-blacks.
in reply to Jones Murphy

@jonesmurphy @benroyce @swacknificent @maya_b @gerowen @ariarhythmic
A couple days ago the big news was by a small margin more Whites disapproved of Trump. Imagine that. About 50% of Whites, after all that has transpired, still support this guy. That pretty much says it all.
in reply to Mastodon Migration

@mastodonmigration @benroyce @swacknificent @maya_b @gerowen @ariarhythmic the percentage actually willing to vote GOP: again is a lot higher than 50%. Remember, Trump's approval was 34% after Jan 6th. 49% actually voted for him again.
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce @maya_b @gerowen @ariarhythmic It likely is, but the Left has done this before organicly in France, look at how big a deal Sartre, Boullivard, Camus once were and look at French left party enrollment since and look at the philosophers from France since, fighting with each other for smaller pieces of purity.
in reply to Scrimshaw

@Scrimshaw9 @maya_b @gerowen @ariarhythmic
the essential problem on the left

i didn't say with the left, because some of this infighting is achieved with agent provocateurs and right wingers cosplaying because it's so easy. but, yes, some of it is organic to the left

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 giorno fa)
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce @Scrimshaw9 @maya_b @gerowen @ariarhythmic I feel as though I must be missing something... shouldn't that image be flipped so that the left is on the, well, left?
Questa voce è stata modificata (1 giorno fa)
in reply to Bill Hooker

@sennoma @Scrimshaw9 @maya_b @gerowen @ariarhythmic
😆

but it's even worse than that because most of the world uses red for left and blue for right

so any non-american viewing this will be confused about what is being said here

in reply to Bill Hooker

@sennoma @benroyce @Scrimshaw9 @maya_b @gerowen @ariarhythmic Anyone who thinks the Right is unified has never spent time reading Right side forums.

They are always arguing with each other and complaining about a lack of unity.

And they see the Left as a united horde.

Every movement looks unified from the outside, and chaotic from the inside.

in reply to mike805

@mike805 @sennoma @Scrimshaw9 @maya_b @gerowen @ariarhythmic
i disagree

of course there is some disunity on the right as well

but what the right has that the left does not is this absolutely devoted, absolutely fucking stupid and mindless, MAGA cult of zombies who fervently show up to vote and fervently obey their plutocrat masters

that's a huge problem

in reply to Mastodon

Mastodon could aspire to replace X in Europe (given the current situation in the U.S. and the state of X). It is urgent that it include translation capabilities for this multilingual region
in reply to Mastodon

do not, I repeat DO NOT attempt to implement age verification. You’ll kill the platform. See: Discord.

Decentralised, federated networks are one of the few bastions from which we can fight this. Don’t throw that away.

in reply to Mastodon

@Gargron Project leaders should commit now to never poison the codebase with this stuff. If individual servers want to implement invasive age-checks (or have to in order to satisfy their local laws), that's up to them, but do not allow such things to fracture the Fediverse. Commit now to never allowing features such as blocking federation to/from non-age-verified servers.
Questa voce è stata modificata (1 giorno fa)
in reply to Mastodon

From a a post from @mellifluousbox

"Their agenda is explicitly not to _implement_ age verification/assurance, neither in the Mastodon software nor in our own servers."

mastodon.social/@mellifluousbo…


RE: mastodon.social/@Mastodon/1160…

I want to expand on the age-verification working group plan, to avoid confusion. The goal is to create an informal group of experts in the areas of law, privacy, trust & safety, and technology. Their agenda is explicitly not to _implement_ age verification/assurance, neither in the Mastodon software nor in our own servers. The group will assess various risks for the user base, the server admins, and the project and analyse it from different perspectives to provide a balanced recommendation.

@Mastodon@mastodon.social:

Today we're sharing the first in a series of three posts from our leadership team, starting with @mellifluousbox discussing our mission, and priorities for 2026. Stay tuned this week for more.
blog.joinmastodon.org/2026/02/…