Salta al contenuto principale


Raw numbers are perhaps not enough to get across just how bad the centralisation of the Fediverse by mastodon.social is. I've done a chart to show this visually, hopefully this will make the situation clearer?

Given the circumstances, getting people to join *any* other server except mastodon.social would greatly help decentralise the Fediverse. It's no longer big vs medium vs small, it's more like supergiant deathstar mastodon.social vs everyone else 😞

#Mastodon #Fediverse #MastodonSocial

in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

p.p.s. If anyone currently on mastodon.social wants help moving to a different server, there's an easy-to-understand step-by-step guide at fedi.tips/transferring-your-ma…

Let me know if you have any difficulties with any particular step 🙂

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 settimane fa)

reshared this

in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

p.p.p.s. Looks like Mastodon gGmbH are now discussing this issue, really good to hear them being proactive! 👍

Let's give the new leadership a chance and see what they come up with 🙂

hachyderm.io/@haubles/11558779…


Hi there - I’ve just joined the Mastodon team full time, and part of my role is working on mastodon.social and mastodon.online. I’m just getting started and still in learning mode, but I want to say that I’m aware of this issue and the team is actively discussing how we can evolve in a way that both delivers on #Mastodon’s promise of decentralization, and provides a “safe landing place” for new users. I’m grateful for all the ideas and writing you’ve shared. I’m listening, and thank you.

reshared this

in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

FWIW I built a tool to help you see how distributed your own personal network is: moderation-explorer.online/

reshared this

in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

I think one of the main problems is you can't transfer your posts to a new account. But I heard that @jonny was maybe working on finding a fix for this! So, one can hope that if this gets fixed it will be much easier for people to move out of mastodon.social.

PS: thank you for all your great guides 😀

in reply to El Duvelle

@elduvelle

If you follow the guide, your old posts will remain in existence and help redirect people to your new account 🙂

in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

@elduvelle

I recently did a poll, and nearly half of all people who voted said that it bothered them that their posts didn't migrate with their accounts.

I have to admit, I was quite surprised.

in reply to El Duvelle

@elduvelle
That it wasn't less.

I mean, for me #Mastodon is #microblogging first and foremost. And in microblogging, posts are ephemeral and soon forgotten. Personally, I don't really _care_ what I posted a year ago - unless I bookmarked it. And even then, the old posts arent even _gone_ unless the old instance closes down.

But evidently, a very large number of Mastodon users feel very differently about this.

mementomori.social/@juergen_hu…


In the past, I have frequently mentioned how easy it is to move from one #Mastodon instance to another. I have done so twice in the past, and I generally recommend that people use that feature to get away from the big instances (such as Mastodon.social) and to one of the smaller ones so that the #Fediverse is more "spread out".

However, there are always some people who object to this, noting that while you can migrate your follows, followers, bookmarks, blocks and so forth, you _cannot_ migrate your old posts.

This has never bothered me since Mastodon is essentially a #microblogging system, and I see microblogging as "fire and forget" in nature - any given post might be shared for a few days, but is soon forgotten unless someone bookmarks it. Besides, it's not as if the posts are actually gone from the old instance unless it closes down.

But many see this as a major obstacle to migrating instances, and thus I want to know: Does it bother you that you cannot migrate your posts when migrating Mastodon instances?

#Fediverse


in reply to Jürgen Hubert

@juergen_hubert
I see! Indeed I am more on the side of "permanent repository of my thoughts", I often search my old posts for some link, poll or info that I know exists in the past. I wouldn't want to migrate instances if it meant loosing my post history. I'd rather loose my follows / followers - you can always find then back - than my posts.

I guess I probably also have some trauma from when I had to leave twitter to join mastodon and had to say bye-bye to all my precious tweets.. Not ready for that to ever happen again!

in reply to El Duvelle

@elduvelle @juergen_hubert That’s the exact dividing line between the two opinions: some people feel that their posts are precious, others that they are naturally ephemeral. Personally I think anyone in the “precious” camp needs to have their own website. It is easy and inexpensive, and you are not subject to losing everything just because a random individual server owner quits (or sells out to someone terrible).
in reply to Moss Wizard

@Moss @juergen_hubert
A website is really not the same purpose as an interactive communication platform like Mastodon / Fedi though. It doesn't have the same reach - people have to go and read your website. The interest of the posts on here is not just the posts content but the discussions that come with them.
It's also not that easy to set up, you have to figure out a host, make the website, regularly update the website, probably pay for the domain name etc. (I never made a website, there are probably a lot more steps). It's a good thing to have but certainly not a replacement for social media.
Questa voce è stata modificata (2 settimane fa)
in reply to El Duvelle

@elduvelle @Moss

It's possible to split the middle, though. For instance, I am running a #WordPress site - and turned it into a #Fediverse server with the #ActivityPub plugin.

Now people can search for individual blog posts on their Fediverse instance, and read it and comment on it as if it was a Mastodon post (for instance).

There are also quite a few other Fediverse-based blogging solutions that allow people to blog right into other people's feeds.

in reply to Jürgen Hubert

@juergen_hubert @elduvelle I also have a Wordpress site, with a “post to Mastodon” plugin. Anything I post there gets posted to my masto account, and also stays stored on my own site. It doesn’t go both ways, so any replies stay on fedi. But if there is a conversation I want to save, I can copy the posts and manually add them to my site. That way you can preserve the context for later reference.
in reply to Jürgen Hubert

@juergen_hubert @elduvelle Yeah, there are definitely very different ways of seeing this. I also see my old posts as irrelevant and have set them to auto-delete. Of course, having my history reset to 0 on a move is a little annoying, so I guess a way to move say up to 5000 posts (or some cap selected by the server admin) would make sense?
in reply to Veronica Olsen

And then there is me ... having a copy of my Twitter archive since 2009 ...
in reply to me

@me @veronica @elduvelle
...out of curiosity, how often have you actually looked at it since you downloaded it?
in reply to Jürgen Hubert

@juergen_hubert @me @veronica
I also spend hours (days?) figuring out how to get a twitter archive working.

Do I go back to it sometimes? Yes! I would say once every few months to try and find something that I posted. Unfortunately it couldn't archive other people's posts, or even poll results, so it's not that useful.

I also used it to (re-)make some of my pinned posts on here, e.g:

neuromatch.social/@elduvelle_n… (my "work" account)

neuromatch.social/@elduvelle/1…

This is the archive: elduvelle.github.io/

in reply to Veronica Olsen

@veronica @juergen_hubert @elduvelle I just moved recently and I put a link to my old account in my new bio so if you really wanted to you could find my old posts
in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

Do you plan to update the feditips article, section "just recommend one good server", now that mas.to is invite only? 🤔

@FediTips

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 settimane fa)
in reply to Sci-Fi Girl

@5ciFiGirl

Thanks, didn't notice that! I've put ohai.social on there instead as it's also a good general server with lots of connections to the Fediverse.

in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

I already join mastodon.world so I have two accounts. I didn’t know when I join mastodon.social until you guys mention different server I tried understand how that works. Now I got it but oh well!
Questa voce è stata modificata (2 settimane fa)
in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

I feel like this is really easily solvable by just having the apps randomly cycle which server is selected by "default" when people are signing up. Obviously still give the option for people to manually select their preferred network, but by having the default random.

Just limit the random server selection to something like 10-20 reputable instances that have a track record of quality administration. That would avoid sending people to an instance that is unsupported and at a higher risk of shutting down.

in reply to Marc Thomas

@mthx

Yup, that's what a number of people have been saying, and it's what e.g. @nextcloud does on their Nextcloud instance picker.

Get a pool of reliable servers with a good long track record, recommend them in rotation instead of recommending mastodon.social.

reshared this

in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

Hi there - I’ve just joined the Mastodon team full time, and part of my role is working on mastodon.social and mastodon.online. I’m just getting started and still in learning mode, but I want to say that I’m aware of this issue and the team is actively discussing how we can evolve in a way that both delivers on #Mastodon’s promise of decentralization, and provides a “safe landing place” for new users. I’m grateful for all the ideas and writing you’ve shared. I’m listening, and thank you.

reshared this

in reply to hannah aubry

@haubles this is so wonderful to hear! Good luck in your new position.

Hearing this I'm hopeful the issue of balancing on-boarding experience against encouraging new folks to join other instances is going to get handled in a thoughtful way, just as the quote-toots were. This is all very exciting!

@FediGarden

in reply to Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

@rysiek
Thank you 😊 We are working very hard to make sure everything we do evolves in a thoughtful way, and in a way that protects and reflects the needs our community.

reshared this

in reply to hannah aubry

@haubles

Hi Hannah,

Thank you for taking the time to reply about this 🙏

If it's any help for the discussions within Mastodon, Nextcloud solved this issue by drawing up a pool of reliable instances with good track records, then recommending one from the pool on a rotating basis.

Because they only recommended one at a time it avoided the "paralysis of choice", but as it was rotated it spread the growth, and because the pool was all reliable instances it maintained a level of quality.

in reply to hannah aubry

Sensitive content

in reply to hannah aubry

@haubles @Rowan

Just to push back against this concept of a "starter server" or "launching place", that doesn't really exist. There are just well-run servers and badly-run servers.

There's nothing easier or safer or tutorial-like about using mastodon.social than other reputable servers, and if there was it would simply encourage even more people to join mastodon.social and stay there 😦

in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

Sensitive content

in reply to Making Up Rowan 🏳️‍⚧️👩

@Rowan @haubles

I don't think throwing people off a server when they've done nothing wrong is a good idea?

It would be easier to just add tutorial features to the software itself so that they are available to new people on any server.

in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

Sensitive content

in reply to Making Up Rowan 🏳️‍⚧️👩

@Rowan @haubles

Think it has merit. Another way to think about this concept would be to take a page from role playing computer games. When you start you arrive on "newbie island" when you walk through a few simple tasks that familiarize you with the UI and your various server options. But pretty soon you have to (get to!) move off into the real game equipt with some knowledge, the choices you've made, and a modicum of skill.

in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

Does this data set include bsky.brid.gy? Presumably if Bluesky goes to "opt-in is the default", as its management would reportedly like to do, that will dwarf mastodon.social.