J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

"O mia Rosina, tu mi piaci tanto,
e come il mare piace a una sirena.
E quando non ti vedo piango tanto
che non mi scorre il sangue nelle vene.

Meglio sarebbe se non ti avessi amato.
Sapevo il Credo ed ora l’ho scordato.
Pur non sapendo più l’Ave Maria,
come potrò salvar l’anima mia?

O mia Rosina, mi hai ridotto male:
andavo a messa e non so dove sia;
sapevo le parole del messale,
ed ora non so più l’Ave Maria. "

#canzonidellanonna #lanonnacantavaspesso #folk

reshared this

J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

The "smarter" all the devices get, the smarter I feel for not buying them.
J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

Do you remember the surprise announcement of a new social network in Davos this past January? Something that promised to be the "first" European social network?

Its name is #WSocial and it's a fork of #Bluesky. Its founders have ties with European politicians - but there is no official involvement by the EU.

You wouldn't know any of this from media reports because they all rehashed their talking points. So I wrote a post about it, dispelling some myths:

blog.elenarossini.com/w-social…

#OpenWashing


W Social uncovered: the reality behind the hype


In January my corner of the social web was abuzz with the surprising announcement at Davos of a new social network: W Social, which aspires to be an alternative to X, based in Europe, with "identity verification to fight disinformation." Its goal? To foster social sovereignty for European citizens, away from the control and influence of U.S. tech behemoths.

There was a lot of ambiguity surrounding the announcement with implications that this may be an initiative driven by European politicians. Was the European Commission involved? Would governments be funding a new social platform for European citizens that required ID verification? It was hard to tell.

Meanwhile, many European newspapers, blogs, radio and TV stations covered this announcement extensively, with great enthusiasm - day after day for what seemed like a full week. Most of the reporting seemed to be a simple rehashing of a press release.

It took me about 5 minutes of research to start uncovering some really surprising elements. The contrast between the media hype and the reality was so jarring, that I decided to start collecting evidence and share what I found in a blog post.

With my article today I aim to share the reality behind the hype, doing the work that journalists should have done at the beginning.

⚠️
Disclaimer:

This article represents my personal opinions, commentary, and conclusions formed through independent research using publicly available sources. Any characterizations, interpretations, or inferences are presented as opinion, not as statements of objective fact. Readers are encouraged to review the referenced materials and draw their own conclusions.

Why should YOU care?


World events from the past two years have pushed a lot of European leaders to start reassessing Europe's dependence on American tech infrastructure.

European politicians and policy experts have started holding meetings to discuss "Trusted European Platforms (TEPs) to strengthen Europe’s strategic autonomy." W Social is being mentioned in these discussions:

Sovereign Democracy & Trusted European Platforms: starting!
Sovereign Democracy & Trusted European Platforms: starting!
Stars4MediaStars4Media Project


I understand that doing due diligence requires time and technical expertise.

I would like to collect in this post all the evidence I found of why I personally don't think W Social is a solution for Europe’s digital sovereignty.

If anything, we should exercise critical thinking, follow the money and analyze who has control over social media platforms. It is no coincidence that tech oligarchs in the U.S. have been on a media purchasing spree, scooping up newspapers, TV stations and social media networks - especially in the past 4 years. Controlling the flow of information is a potent thing - and we should be very careful of whom we give that power to.

A word from the author


Before we get started, why should you listen to me?

Well, I have been very active on decentralized social networks for four years now, championing these online spaces over centralized offerings by Big Tech platforms.

I have been invited to speak about my views and experiences at Journées du Logiciel Libre in Lyon, PublicSpaces in Amsterdam, Berlin Fediverse Day, Social Media Strategies in Bologna and this past month I gave a talk at the Ministry of Culture in Paris and delivered the opening keynote at 2MR in Hamburg.
a photo of me on stage at Social Media Strategies in Bologna, Italy - next to Niccolò Venerandi and morloi
In addition to my advocacy, I have been self-hosting my own social media platforms (GoToSocial, PeerTube and Pixelfed instances) and I’ve set up essential services like NextCloud… purposefully using domain name registrars, web and VPS hosting companies based in Europe.

The topics of open social networks, FOSS alternatives to Big Tech platforms and European cloud infrastructure are my bread and butter.

I have been alarmed by the hype around the launch of W Social and all the inaccuracies in news reports. Thus my speaking up.

Issue no.1: How W Social ignored existing European initiatives


People in my circles discussed the announcement of W Social with disbelief and a touch of anger. At launch, the official website of W Social showcased a world map, with icons of American tech platforms (Bluesky, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Reddit, Snapchat, TikTok US, Whatsapp, X and YouTube) superimposed over the map of the United States; then over Russia you can see the logos of OK and Vkontakte, over China there is QQ, TikTok, WeChat and Weibo, and over India there is ShareChat. A circle is drawn around Europe... but there are no icons inside. The message: W Social is here to fill that void and provide a European social network.
a world map, with icons of American tech platforms (Bluesky, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Reddit, Snapchat, TikTok US, Whatsapp, X and YouTube) superimposed over the map of the United States; then over Russia you can see the logos of OK and Vkontakte, over China there is QQ, TikTok, WeChat and Weibo, and over India there is ShareChat. A circle is drawn around Europe... but there are no icons inside.a screenshot of the initial landing page for W Social on January 21st 2026
This provoked the ire of many of my friends and fellow Fediverse netizens - because decentralized social media platforms like Mastodon and PeerTube originated in Europe; the Fediverse has over 12 million users. Omitting this felt like a strange choice. Even the European Commission has an active Mastodon account: on their own server, with over 154,000 followers!

European Commission (@EUCommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu)
3.58K Posts, 10 Following, 154K Followers · News and information from the European Commission. A project to foster our presence in the fediverse and support our commitment to European social media platforms based on open source technology. 🇪🇺 Official Mastodon account as verified by the official EU domain in our server’s address (
https://europa.eu).
European Commission on Mastodon


While most people focused their frustration on that omission, I thought of something else entirely: for months I had been hearing about the development of Eurosky, based on Bluesky's ATproto.

A mission statement, from Eurosky's website (a note: I grabbed this text in January and the page has since changed. But you can see the original courtesy of the Internet Archive):

Eurosky is building the future of social media - open, pluralistic, and made in Europe. We believe social media should serve our economies and societies, not monopolies. Eurosky is a public-interest infrastructure project that puts control in the hands of users, businesses, and European society. By combining European cloud infrastructure with open standards and democratic governance, we’re creating a new ecosystem where innovation thrives, moderation is transparent, and no single company or country can dictate the rules.


a screenshot of Eurosky's website from late January 2026. there is an announcement bar at the top saying that eurosky.social accounts would be launching in January 2026... and below text that says: "the next era of social media: built and run in Europe, ruled by our laws."a screenshot of Eurosky's website from late January 2026
By reading articles about W Social, you could easily think journalists were discussing Eurosky. The two platforms are so eerily similar in their stated goals, that when I heard that a new European social platform was launching to rival X, when I read it was called "W Social" my first thought was that Eurosky must have rebranded and changed its name. After all, it was supposed to launch in January 2026 and the announcement of W Social was made in Davos on January 20th 2026.

Oh no. They are two completely different initiatives.

Here is what Robin Berjon - one of the architects of Eurosky - had to say about W Social:
a screenshot of a Bluesky post by Robin Berjon in response to the map on W Social's homepage. Berjon's message reads: "It's also *deliberately* disingenuous because we did explain AT and Eurosky at great length to their primary funder. If I were launching a social media about truth and verification I'd, like, try not to lie but that's just me. Anyway, some of us have work to do."a screenshot of a post by Robin Berjon of Eurosky
While the two initiatives share similar goals, their execution could not be more different.

Eurosky has been slowly and carefully planned out, online and behind the scenes. Its website is sleek and professional, with extensive information explaining what the project is about, team bios, a timeline of objectives. When French and German political leaders met in Berlin in November 2025 at the Summit on European Digital Sovereignty to discuss European tech sovereignty plans, Eurosky team members organized their own conference in Berlin as a "side event", in order to show policy makers what they were working on. This is a very well prepared team of experts.

By contrast, if you visited the website of W Social on its launch day, all you had was a rudimentary landing page with a map of Europe and the invitation to enter an invite code. Any 14-year-old with an hour to spare and a free Canva account could have designed something more professional looking.

Now the page has been updated with a slightly sleeker design for its landing page but it is still lacking any content (as of May 7th, 2026):
the landing page of W social on May 7, 2026. It has a large W social logo, the tagline "trust your feed" and some text below over a dark blue background faintly showing a world mapthe landing page of W social on May 7, 2026
W Social's announcement at Davos felt very rushed, with minimal preparation just to get the word out there about their plans and get a leg up in the news cycle about European platforms as alternatives to Big Tech offerings from Silicon Valley.

With work on Eurosky being well under way (they eventually opened migrations to their server from Bluesky in February), I kept wondering: "Why? What is the point of W Social, another European fork of Bluesky?" And then everything clicked: maybe W Social is banking on mandatory age verification for European users in order to use social media. This could be their "leg up" over Eurosky: the need for an official government ID to open an account and use it.

Issue no.2: W Social's bungled attempt to conceal they are using Bluesky's AT Protocol


How will W Social work? Which technology will it employ to power its revolutionary European social network?

You would think journalists would ask these questions.

Sadly, that wasn't the case.

Online sleuths discovered the page stage.wsocial.eu that revealed WSocial is none other than a fork of Bluesky, thus based on ATProto.

Developers typically test out platforms on a staging website before launching or going in production... the staging page for W Social was exactly like the Bluesky login page. If you clicked on the "x" to close that preview window, you would see a Bluesky feed:


screenshots putting the landing page of Bluesky and the staging page for W Social side by side...
a screenshot of W social's early feed from the staging page. basically a Bluesky feed
That page was active for a few days: if you shared a link to it from Signal for example - like I did - you would see a preview card with the Bluesky logo. So much for calling out Bluesky and conflating it with other Big Tech offerings by Meta and ByteDance.
a screenshot showing the link to stage.wsocial.eu that I shared in a message on Signal. a preview card appears with the Bluesky logo
Additional proof: the URL dev-pds.wsocial.eu which showed the ATproto logo and stated "this is an AT Protocol Personal Data Server" (the two URLs have since been migrated):
a screenshot showing a browser window visiting the address dev-pds.wsocial.eu and showing the atproto logo and the message "This is an AT Protocol Personal Data Server with links to the code on GitHub
This Scooby-Doo unmasking meme shared by DoktorZjivago on Mastodon is a perfect illustration for this:
the screenshot of a toot by DoktorZjivago on Mastodon showing the Scooby-Doo reveal: someone with a mask has the W social logo on their face... when the mask is taken off you can see a Bluesky logo underneath
I'm guessing that after catching some flack online – regarding their high aspirations of having a European tech stack but picking the American Bluesky and their protocol – someone in charge of W Social commanded that their staging website scrap all evidence of ATproto.

So the stage.wsocial.eu webpage a few days after the official announcement looked like this:
a screenshot showing the new stage.wsocial.eu webpage, with a simple login window that asks for a username and password

Issue no.3: W Social's cavalier attitude towards online security


Did you notice anything wrong in the previous screenshot?

Well, the operation scrapping of all Bluesky branding resulted in the loss of the page's SSL certificate.

This is a LOGIN page into their system.

Why is it bad? Well, when you type a password into a webpage that doesn't have a working SSL certificate, the connection between your browser and the website is unencrypted. That means the password travels as plain text across the Internet.

Did I mention that W Social's value proposition is verified identity and they will require a government ID to create an account? They are asking for your most sensitive data... and yet have a cavalier attitude towards security.

On announcement week, Tom Casavant shared these messages on Bluesky about W Social and its dev-pds.wsocial.eu page (I'm sharing this with Tom's permission):
A screenshot of an exchange on Bluesky between Tom Casavant and another user. Tom: Got access to something I very much probably definitely shouldn't have access to via one of those links on accident User: sounds fun. Tom: I figured I had already said too much and didn't want to say anything else before I was able to contact them and get it fixed haha. Their Kubernetes management software had Github SSO, but didn't lock it down to a single github org, so I had access to everything.
How bad is this?

Potentially catastrophic if the wrong person could so easily gain access into their system.

Am I theorizing about things that may never happen? Sure. But we should all be very careful about the organizations we trust with our most sensitive data. A few months ago a Discord data breach exposed the government IDs of 70,000 users:

Discord Data Breach - 1.5 TB of Data and 2 Million Government ID Photos Extorted
Discord has confirmed a significant data breach that exposed sensitive user information after an attacker compromised a third-party customer service provider.
CybersecurityNewsGuru Baran


Now, I have heard through the grapevines (and read confirmation in the press - more on this later) that W Social hired a team of software engineers and now have more than 20 employees, so I think they are taking things more seriously. Still, their early blunders were really shocking to me.

Issue no.4: the founders or: who are we trusting with our communications?


W Social is being built by a Swedish company called W Social AB, which is a subsidiary of We Don't Have Time, a climate-focused media platform. The W Social project is led by Anna Zeiter, a Swiss privacy expert who previously served as Chief Privacy Officer at eBay for more than a decade; she holds a PhD in law from the University of Hamburg. Not the typical background for a tech founder.
a screenshot showing Anna Zeiter's profile photo on Bluesky: a middle-aged white blonde woman wearing a white turtleneck. Her username is @anna.wsocial.eu. She has 367 followers and describes herself as CEO of W, Board Member, Professor, Sailor, Skier, Flutist and Abstract Artista screenshot of Anna Zeiter's profile as it appears on Bluesky
According to an article on Impact Loop, W Social received 2.5 million Euros in funding and has a team of 25 people. Its board of advisors includes very powerful, well-connected people in the world of business and politics, including Cristina Caffarra (chair of EuroStack), Elizabeth Denham (former UK Information Commissioner), Sandrine Dixson-Declève (Honorary President of the Club of Rome), Yariv Adan (former Head of AI at Google), Pär Nuder (former Swedish Minister of Finance), Marc Placzek (former CPO at PayPal) and Philipp Rösler (former German vice-chancellor).

At Davos, Zeiter was interviewed during a We Don't Have Time segment and had a chance to talk about her intentions for the platform - the video was posted on X, but I am using the alternate site nitter.net to display it (so you won't need an X account to see it):
a screenshot of a post on X (shown on Nitter) about Zeiter's interview
Direct link: nitter.net/WeDontHaveTime/stat…

Zeiter said:

Everything is data-driven. Ten years ago we said 'data is the new oil', right now we say 'high quality data is the new oil.' And this is what we are seeing, that competitors in the U.S. and China are using a lot of personal data to analyze, to target... and also sometimes to manipulate users. We want to be different in that respect. Of course, we want to respect GDPR and other European laws because we are run, built and governed in Europe and we would also like to give back to the users. We like to give for example, the face identification process, we want to make sure that users can govern their own data and also their own algorithms, so that users can really choose: "do I want to stay in my filter bubble?" or "do I want to see a little bit more of what is going on in society?" or "do I want to have the full spectrum?"


This is their pitch: a social media platform with a pick-your-own algorithm, that requires government ID to sign up.

What I take issue with here is the sentence "we are run, built and governed in Europe." Why hide that they are using the ATproto infrastructure to operate? Theirs is not a novel, completely original, built from the ground up platform. It is based on Bluesky's ATproto. And yet, this protocol has never been mentioned in any interviews.

Software engineer Maho Pacheco theorized:

I have strong suspicions about why W selected ATproto instead of Activity Pub. Basically there is more power in the biggest actors, a more "centralized" control, to ban/shadow-ban/censure and pull the plug. In other words it is more impactful when Bluesky sidebanned someone or some community than if mastodon.social would do it. The firehose/relay is a the biggest point of control. So in my opinion it is more interesting for investors to create a platform that can be controlled, even if it is just to introduce ads or control the discourse. Technically is because setting-up/supporting/maintaining the firehose/relay layer is very expensive. Every single message would flow through there; creating the biggest firehose in Europe is such a power. So, it is easier to be controlled, and very unlikely to be replicated by other entities.


Issue no. 5: lack of transparency


Following their surprise announcement at Davos, there were dozens of news reports in newspapers, radio shows and TV news shows about this "new European network that will replace X" - with strong implications that it may be an official initiative by the European Union.
a screenshot showing articles about W Social on Google News
This went on for TEN DAYS - with zero fact checking by media organizations or corrections by the W Social founders.

The first news organization to fact check and debunk the myth of official involvement by the European Union was Euronews. In a segment for The Cube (which you could watch here), journalist James Thomas said:

Claims are spreading online like wildfire that the European Union is setting up its own social media platform to rival X. These posts have spread primarily on X itself, with thousands of views and say that taxpayers money will be used to set up W as an alternative to Elon Musk's platform. Some posts describe it as a state-run censorship platform that has receive funding from the European executive, but these claims are misleading. A European Commission spokesperson told The Cube that the EU is not launching, funding or operating any social media platform. There is no European-backed projected called "W".


This came ten days too late, with dozens of news reports legitimizing W as an official European alternative to X.

Let's do some role-playing here: if I were to launch a privately funded project that received extensive media coverage in newspapers, on the radio and TV, but with reports wrongly claiming that the government was behind it... well, the first thing I would do would be to contact journalists to rectify the mistake. I may even put text on my website to correct the assumptions.

W did not do that. I will always remember their silence on this.

I am not sure I can fully trust an initiative that lacked clarity and honesty on two crucial points:

  • hiding that they are a fork of Bluesky;
  • not correcting wrong claims about their origins, letting people believe that they are part of a European Union initiative - whereas in reality they are a private venture, funded by private investors.

And then there is the thorny issue of their required ID verification, the erosion of privacy and the end of internet anonymity. Em wrote an excellent article pointing out the problems with age verification laws for social media users - it is a must read and covers many of the reasons why government IDs to use social media is a very bad idea:

Age Verification Wants Your Face, and Your Privacy
Age verification laws forcing platforms to restrict access to content online have been multiplying in recent years. The problem is, implementing such measure necessarily requires identifying each user accessing this content, one way or another. This is bad news for your privacy.
Privacy GuidesEm


The Electronic Frontier Foundation also has a superb piece about this topic:

10 (Not So) Hidden Dangers of Age Verification
It’s nearly the end of 2025, and half of the US and the UK now require you to upload your ID or scan your face to watch “sexual content.” A handful of states and Australia now have various requirements to verify your age before you can create a social media account.Age-verification laws may sound…
Electronic Frontier FoundationRindala Alajaji

Final Thoughts


I have a lot more to say about this but I realize that in this post-literate era I have already written a very long post that will take time to read and fully digest. I will stop here - for now. W Social is set to launch tomorrow May 9th on Europe Day. As it happened when it was first announced in January, it is likely to receive a lot of uncritical, superficial press coverage. Please exercise critical thinking and try to look at the reality behind its hype. And if you are not familiar with open social networks, please take a look at a better option: the Fediverse.

Thanks for being here,

Elena
a hand-written note by me that reads: "written by a human" followed by a drawn heart


💓 Did you enjoy this post? Share it with a friend!
👫 Follow me on Mastodon. All my other links are available here: elena.social
💌 If you'd like to say hi, my contact information is here
✏️ If this post resonated with you, leave a comment!


Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale

ikuturso 🇪🇺

@marjolica just the nature of free software that anyone can use it for any purpose. There's a North Korean Linux distro but that's not because Linus Torvalds or any of the contributors support North Korea.

Nobody has to federate with them and in fact they decided they don't want to federate with anyone anyway.

IIRC Truth Social was in breach of the license terms at first but later started releasing their changes to the source code too.

J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

The space between all things.

Everything dances in #Iceland. The place where the planet smells freshly baked. If the earth doesn't knock you down with its swaying, the wind will. The only way to stay upright is through dance.

#illustration #art #dance

Questa voce è stata modificata (4 settimane fa)

reshared this

J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

D'ora in avanti il mio lavoro sarà (purtroppo) molto più lasso e diluito, quindi:

cerco lavoro, anche in collaborazione esterna o di qualsiasi altro tipo, principalmente da remoto, come editor di redazione / redattrice editoriale.

Negli ultimi 7 anni mi sono occupata di editing digitale, progettazione e creazione di corsi FAD, revisione, correzione bozze, manutenzione della piattaforma Moodle, schede prodotto, un po' di servizio clienti via email.
Ho ovviamente anche esperienza sul cartaceo.

Ho un corso di copywriting fresco fresco.

C1 in inglese e spagnolo, B1 in francese.

Ovvia conoscenza del pacchetto office + iSpring suite.

Spippolo con Canva.

Creativa, risolutrice di problemi col pensiero laterale, adattabile, poliedrica, autonoma, jack of all trades

Daje :boost_ok:

J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

Latest painting..

Oil and acrylic on canvas

J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

NO a Palantir in Europa: ecco l'iniziativa europea per chiedere all'Unione Europea di sospendere ogni rapporto con Palantir

Chiediamo ai governi europei di:

- Bloccare la firma di nuovi contratti con Palantir.
- Rivedere e rescindere gradualmente i contratti in essere con l’azienda.
- Investire in alternative europee trasparenti e pubblicamente responsabili.

@eticadigitale

action.wemove.eu/sign/2026-03-…

(SEGUE)

J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

scuola.wiki: una istruzione libera grazie a strumenti open source

Da qualche tempo mi sono messo al lavoro per creare un elenco breve e ragionato dei programmi adatti all’istruzione. Oggi nasce quindi scuola.wiki una raccolta “essenziale” di software open source da cui le scuole possono partire per svincolarsi da sistemi operativi e programmi proprietari. 🎓

@opensource

#Scuola #ScuolaOpenSource #SoftwareLibero

Questa voce è stata modificata (2 mesi fa)
J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

THIS 👇
J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

"We use debian, that should be age verification enough"
J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

Imagine a newspaper publisher refusing to let libraries keep copies of its paper. That’s effectively what’s starting online, as big publishers block the Internet Archive from preserving news sites. eff.org/deeplinks/2026/03/bloc…
in reply to wakest likes your bugs ⁂

OpenCollective responded to our collective concerns about identity verification and halted their use of Persona. I'm really happy to see this reaction by @opencollective -
opencollective.com/opensource/…

Thanks to @liaizon to raise the alarm bells and so many who spoke up in this rather sensitive matter - people do need the money for their communities, but we need to have more control over the process. OpenCollective and @Liberapay are important actors here for the ecosystem.

Of course much concern remains for the reliance on US law (OpenCollective) and all credit card payment providers are under US control. Recall what happened to the ICC judges? So we need to work towards more reliable systems under our control.

To be continued. The @fkinstitute and the DemocraticTech.Fund will be working with these concerns in mind.

reshared this

J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

The EU’s Open Source Software Strategy calls for reducing dependency on proprietary technologies. But for feedback on the Cyber Resilience Act, they're asking for feedback in .xlsx format! This is obviously not ideal – so please sign our open letter: blog.documentfoundation.org/bl… #foss #openSource #freesoftware
J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

Not sure where #Google asked for feedback about their developer verification program, but they surely didn't talk with #FLOSS devs, civil society, privacy organisations or their #Android users

#FDroid did since September, and interacted with folks in the Fediverse, forum, email and in person

They all voiced one opinion: "developer verification must be stopped"

@marcprux has written an open letter, signed by likeminded organisations who want to #keepandroidopen

Click: f-droid.org/2026/02/24/open-le…

J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

Bellissimo 🤯🍄

Questa azienda ha trovato un modo geniale per dire addio al polistirolo: imballaggi fatti… con i funghi! Un packaging naturale, compostabile, che protegge i prodotti come fa il polistirolo ma senza inquinare per centinaia di anni.

Meno AI e più questi tipi di innovazione che dovremmo vedere ovunque. 🌍✨

🌱 Altre innovazioni per un mondo migliore le trovi nel gruppo @ambiente@diggita.com, se ti appassionano le soluzioni concrete per un pianeta più sano, unisciti alla conversazione!

Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale

Fabrizio

@mariosiniscalchi bello anche se resta ancora il problema del costo. Vedo che un se per mettere al sicuro una bottiglia o una candela sta a circa 1.5£ medi.

Con quel costo un'azienda ci imballa almeno 10 bottiglie con il package tradizionali.

Ben vengano comunque iniziative del genere perché presto verranno scalate per diventare più economiche ed appetibili a chi dell'ambiente se ne frega e guarda solo al profitto.

J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

Sono molto critico dell'IA generativa, sin dagli albori, ma ho sempre parlato con piacere con chi la sostiene.

Più passa il tempo, più li vedo fare atti di contorsionismo per ignorare quanto sia problematica. Sospendiamo un attimo le questioni etiche e parliamo solo di quelle pratiche:

1) è impossibile assemblarsi un PC perché non si trovano RAM, hard disk e GPU (se prima erano colpiti solo i gamer, ora sono colpitx tuttx)

-> Segue

Unknown parent

mastodon - Collegamento all'originale

Nicholas Laney

@d10c4n3 @muffa
Penso che il "tutto o niente" sia una trappola concettuale che conduce inevitabilmente alla sensazione di inutilità.
Esistono certamente scale organizzative intermedie, per capirci da piccoli o medi gruppi di persone, che seppure non cambieranno il mondo domani possono influire sulla vita di chi vi partecipa.
Ma ciò implica attivarsi e accettare i limiti del reale, compreso che per la maggior parte del tempo non ci si sentirà supereroi (contro la municipale).
Risolvere il mondo è un problema che non è alla portata di nessuno, neanche di chi il potere ce l'ha visto che si basa su inguistizie strutturali, ma migliorare la propria esistenza e l'impatto che ha sulla realtà è possibile nella misura in cui riusciamo a organizzarci in modo definito per obiettivi specifici. E a furia di obiettivi specifici, e se vuoi in sé limitati, non è detto che non si arrivi a qualcosa di più comprensivo.

reshared this

J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

#USpol #Norway #taxes #tax
in reply to David August ❌👑

There are many other benefit to Norwegian taxes.

Lots of people have really good govt jobs here. Good conditions with good pay. This places pressure on corporations to offer good conditions as well. Everyone benefits even if they don't work for the govt.

They also have a wealth tax, which has the net effect of keeping housing affordable. Instead of investors buying lots of houses to rent out and driving up the cost of home ownership, people have a real shot at buying a home to live in.

The third benefit I should mention is everyone in Norway gets to bitch and moan about how much tax they pay, because they have so much time off work to gather and talk to one another!

J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

globalist.it/news/2026/02/06/s…

La nostra intervista al magistrato Luigi Marini

J. Alfred Prufrock reshared this.

J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

vorrei spiegarvi una cosa, visto che da tempo monitoro la presenza di #ICE in Italia

dopo aver letto i cablo di #WikiLeaks sulla macchina dietro le #Olimpiadi e #CampionatiMondiali,ho contattato il #PublicAffairsOffice di #ICE

ilfattoquotidiano.it/in-edicol…

in reply to stefania maurizi

voglio dire: #OlimpiadiParalimpiadi #MilanoCortina2026 non sono dunque una novità per la presenza di grandi agenzie di sicurezza americane, quello che però è nuovo è chi è l'#ICE oggi. La brutalità con cui OGGI opera lascia senza parole

reshared this

J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

Today's threads (a thread)

Inside: The Post-American Internet; and more!

Archived at: pluralistic.net/2026/01/01/39c…

#Pluralistic

1/

J. Alfred Prufrock reshared this.

in reply to Cory Doctorow

I'm coming to Colorado! Catch me in #Denver on Jan 22 at The Tattered Cover:

eventbrite.com/e/cory-doctorow…

And in #ColoradoSprings from Jan 23-25, where I'm the Guest of Honor at COSine:

firstfridayfandom.org/cosine/

Then I'll be in #Ottawa on Jan 28 at Perfect Books:

instagram.com/p/DS2nGiHiNUh/

And in #Toronto with Tim Wu on Jan 30:

nowtoronto.com/event/cory-doct…

2/

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/3

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/4

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/5

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/6

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/7

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/8

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/9

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/10

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/11

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/12

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/13

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/14

Sensitive content

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Long thread/eof

Sensitive content

J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

È pauroso e vergognoso,come cittadini italiani, essere rappresentati da un governo come quello #Meloni che ritiene legittimo un colpo di stato come quello di Trump contro il #Venezuela
J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

As an Italian citizen, I find it scary and outrageous to be represented by a government like the #Meloni government which thinks the #Trump's coup d'etat against #Venezuela is *legitimate*
in reply to stefania maurizi

it also reflects a turning point in history... #Isreal and #USA and others brought #genocide back into the toolkit of liberal democracies, and Putin returned vainglorious conquest for historical grievance back to the language of major totalitarian states. (China will soon *wreck" itself in Taiwan.) The lesson is, don't become a failed state, and have a harmful military. #Ukraine learned this and is teaching the world right now! Defend! #venezuela can't. Are you listening #Denmark?
J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

Quando ministri, sindaci, assessori, dirigenti pubblici o vertici di enti e società partecipate, cioè chi governa e chi firma per lo Stato, provocano un danno alle casse pubbliche, quel danno dovrebbe essere ripagato integralmente.Con la riforma della Corte dei Conti non è più così. La responsabilità personale viene limitata e una parte del danno viene scaricata sulla collettività. È deresponsabilizzazione istituzionalizzata. Chi governa si protegge. Chi paga, come sempre, siamo noi
@attualita

reshared this

J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

Today's threads (a thread)

Inside: The Reverse Centaur’s Guide to Criticizing AI; and more!

Archived at: pluralistic.net/2025/12/05/pop…

#Pluralistic

1/

reshared this

in reply to Cory Doctorow

"It's because in a creative market dominated by five publishers, four studios, three labels, two mobile app stores, and a single company that controls all the ebooks and audiobooks, giving a creative worker extra rights to bargain with is like giving your bullied kid more lunch money."

I gotta work that into a conversation sometime soon.

Cory Doctorow reshared this.

in reply to Cory Doctorow

By this analysis, organizations/corporations that buy into the #AI sales pitch and replace their workforce seem likely to collapse due to incompetence. Those that maintain their human expertise would thrive because of decreased competition. This, of course, assumes that civilization doesn't completely fall apart. The massive economic power of the big monopolies coupled with incompetence is really scary. Kind of similar to the Trump administration.
I need to think more about it
#ai
J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

La notizia è rimbalzata in tutta #Europa come un boomerang di indignazione: l’#Irlanda ha nominato #NiamhSweeney, ex #dirigente e #lobbista di #Meta (#Facebook), come nuova #vicecommissaria per la #protezionedeidati personali. In altri tempi sarebbe stata una curiosità burocratica; oggi, nel cuore dell’era #digitale e sotto l’ombrello del #GDPR, è una bomba politica.
in reply to Diletta Fileni

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

Una volta si parlava di cattura del regolatore o #regulatorycapture (andreasaltelli.eu/file/reposit…). Ora invece il motto è: Don't capture the regulator: become the regulator!

mastodon.uno/@DilettaFileni/11…


La notizia è rimbalzata in tutta #Europa come un boomerang di indignazione: l’#Irlanda ha nominato #NiamhSweeney, ex #dirigente e #lobbista di #Meta (#Facebook), come nuova #vicecommissaria per la #protezionedeidati personali. In altri tempi sarebbe stata una curiosità burocratica; oggi, nel cuore dell’era #digitale e sotto l’ombrello del #GDPR, è una bomba politica.

Questa voce è stata modificata (7 mesi fa)

Giacomo Tesio reshared this.

J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

Solidarietà a #SigfridoRanucci, alla figlia, a tutta la loro famiglia e a tutta la squadra di #Report, da anni sotto assedio di governo e politica
J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

An Italian journalist's car was destroyed by an explosive device.

An explosive device detonated under the vehicle of prominent Italian investigative journalist Sigfrido Ranucci overnight, as it was parked outside his home, without causing casualties, his investigative television news show announced on Friday

Italian leader Giorgia Meloni denounced it as a 'serious act of intimidation.'

mediafaro.org/article/20251017…

#SigfridoRanucci #Italy #Journalism #Ranucci #Media #Reporting #GiorgiaMeloni

J. Alfred Prufrock reshared this.

J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

«"Hanno trascinato la piccola Greta per i capelli davanti ai nostri occhi, l'hanno picchiata pesantemente e l'hanno costretta a baciare la bandiera israeliana. Hanno fatto di tutto ciò che è immaginabile a lei, come monito per gli altri", ha testimoniato l'attivista turco Ersin Çelik, rilasciato da Ketziot, l'inferno desertico dove le sevizie sono routine. Non contenti di questo assalto fisico, i carcerieri israeliani hanno tormentato Greta trascinandola per terra come un animale, avvolgendola nella bandiera del regime come un trofeo di guerra e esponendola nuda all'umiliazione collettiva, mentre la deridevano per la sua "debolezza".
L'attivista italiano Lorenzo Agostino, compagno di flottiglia, ha descritto come Greta sia stata umiliata in modo sistematico: bendata, ammanettata con ferri troppo stretti che le segavano i polsi, lasciata al gelo per ore senza un sorso d'acqua, in un trattamento che evoca le tattiche di un gruppo terroristico – ironia amara, considerando che Israele si autoproclama vittima.
Testimoni oculari confermano che l'hanno colpita ripetutamente, tirandole i capelli e costringendola a gesti contro la sua volontà, in celle infestate da cimici dove è stata buttata come spazzatura, obbligata a sedere su superfici dure per periodi interminabili, un'arma psicologica per annientare la resistenza. Queste non sono "perquisizioni necessarie": sono torture severe, paragonate apertamente ai crimini nazisti da Çelik stesso, un'eco orrenda che rivela l'ipocrisia di un regime che piange l'Olocausto mentre lo replica contro innocenti.
Greta, "solo una bambina" come l'ha definita un testimone, è stata picchiata, umiliata e violata in modi che gridano vendetta – un monito velenoso a chiunque osi portare aiuti a Gaza. Questo orrore su una giovane donna disarmata non è difesa: è barbarie pura, un crimine contro l'umanità che macchia per sempre l'anima di Israele e dei suoi complici silenziosi». poliversity.it/@emama/11532215…
Questa voce è stata modificata (7 mesi fa)
J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

Folks, Salem needs a tent.

Thanks to your help, we were able to help him evacuate to the South last week during our Gaza Verified Emergency Appeal but we could not get him enough to also get a tent.

He’s now sharing a tent with another family and things are difficult.

Please help if you can and please share it so others can help also.

This is a link to his fundraiser: gofund.me/03d81d6e

And he is on Gaza Verified: gaza-verified.org

Thank you!

💕

#Gaza #Palestine #GazaVerified #mutualAid #fediAid #FreePalestine mastodon.social/@salemgaza/115…

reshared this

J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

Friends, today I face a challenge. My sister urgently needs her treatment — $160 covers her medicine for one week. Who will step up and help us make it happen today? Every dollar counts, and together we can give her the care she desperately needs. I believe in the power of community, and I know someone out there will be the first to answer this call. Please, if you can, be the reason she gets her treatment this week.

chuffed.org/project/128261-pho…

reshared this

in reply to Artist-eslam

Folks, Eslam is one of our new members.

She is, herself, in Egypt but her family are based in Gaza.

Please help if you can and share.

This is her fundraiser: chuffed.org/project/128261-pho…

And she is on Gaza Verified: gaza-verified.org

💕

#Gaza #GazaVerified #mutualAid #fediAid

in reply to Aral Balkan

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

@aral I was displaced to the southern Gaza Strip on foot for 6 hours without anything. I am carrying my children. Now I am sitting in the street without shelter, food, clothes or treatment. We have nothing. Please and I beg you to donate to my family to buy a tent and food.I am tired😭😭
gofund.me/7fc0e346
J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

Non mi piace fare necrologi qui, ma oggi sento di dover condividere un pensiero. #RobertRedford, parlando di #Trump, ha detto che è dolorosamente chiaro come un solo uomo sia riuscito a degradare tutto ciò che toccava, senza capire che il suo compito era difendere la #democrazia. E aveva ragione: la #verità, la #libertàdiparola e di #stampa, il rispetto delle regole… tutto è stato messo in discussione. Parole dure, ma che fotografano bene quello che il mondo intero ha potuto osservare.

reshared this

J. Alfred Prufrock ha ricondiviso questo.

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

❗️❗️Purtroppo non potrò partecipare: per questo metto a disposizione il mio #PassStampa a chi fosse interessato. Se ti/vi serve, scrivimi e lo giro io.

Mercoledì e giovedì prossimi (10–11 settembre) #Berlino si trasformerà nel centro dell’#IntelligenzaArtificiale: sono attesi oltre 8.000 ospiti al #BIGBANGKIFESTIVAL presso la #AlteMünze (Molkenmarkt 31, 10179 Berlino) – il più grande evento #B2B d’#Europa dedicato all’#IA.

Il festival non è un convegno specialistico per pochi esperti, ma 1/n

J. Alfred Prufrock reshared this.

in reply to Diletta Fileni

rende l’IA accessibile a un vasto pubblico: #imprenditori, #politica, #cultura, #media e #sport si incontrano per mostrare come l’#IntelligenzaArtificiale stia cambiando la nostra vita quotidiana, l’#economia e la #società.

Sul palco si alterneranno #figure di primo piano di #OpenAI, #Google, #SAP, #NVIDIA e molti altri #protagonisti della #tecnologia – insieme a voci note e #decisoripolitici, tra cui:

📍Karsten Wildberger (#MinistroperilDigitale)

📍Verona Pooth
2/n