W Social uncovered: the reality behind the hype
In January my corner of the social web was abuzz with the surprising announcement at Davos of a new social network: W Social, which aspires to be an alternative to X, based in Europe, with "identity verification to fight disinformation." Its goal? To foster social sovereignty for European citizens, away from the control and influence of U.S. tech behemoths.
There was a lot of ambiguity surrounding the announcement with implications that this may be an initiative driven by European politicians. Was the European Commission involved? Would governments be funding a new social platform for European citizens that required ID verification? It was hard to tell.
Meanwhile, many European newspapers, blogs, radio and TV stations covered this announcement extensively, with great enthusiasm - day after day for what seemed like a full week. Most of the reporting seemed to be a simple rehashing of a press release.
It took me about 5 minutes of research to start uncovering some really surprising elements. The contrast between the media hype and the reality was so jarring, that I decided to start collecting evidence and share what I found in a blog post.
With my article today I aim to share the reality behind the hype, doing the work that journalists should have done at the beginning.
⚠️
Disclaimer:
This article represents my personal opinions, commentary, and conclusions formed through independent research using publicly available sources. Any characterizations, interpretations, or inferences are presented as opinion, not as statements of objective fact. Readers are encouraged to review the referenced materials and draw their own conclusions.
Why should YOU care?
World events from the past two years have pushed a lot of European leaders to start reassessing Europe's dependence on American tech infrastructure.
European politicians and policy experts have started holding meetings to discuss "Trusted European Platforms (TEPs) to strengthen Europe’s strategic autonomy." W Social is being mentioned in these discussions:
Sovereign Democracy & Trusted European Platforms: starting!
Sovereign Democracy & Trusted European Platforms: starting!
Stars4MediaStars4Media Project

I understand that doing due diligence requires time and technical expertise.
I would like to collect in this post all the evidence I found of why I personally don't think W Social is a solution for Europe’s digital sovereignty.
If anything, we should exercise critical thinking, follow the money and analyze who has control over social media platforms. It is no coincidence that tech oligarchs in the U.S. have been on a media purchasing spree, scooping up newspapers, TV stations and social media networks - especially in the past 4 years. Controlling the flow of information is a potent thing - and we should be very careful of whom we give that power to.
A word from the author
Before we get started, why should you listen to me?
Well, I have been very active on decentralized social networks for four years now, championing these online spaces over centralized offerings by Big Tech platforms.
I have been invited to speak about my views and experiences at Journées du Logiciel Libre in Lyon, PublicSpaces in Amsterdam, Berlin Fediverse Day, Social Media Strategies in Bologna and this past month I gave a talk at the Ministry of Culture in Paris and delivered the opening keynote at 2MR in Hamburg.
a photo of me on stage at Social Media Strategies in Bologna, Italy - next to Niccolò Venerandi and morloi
In addition to my advocacy, I have been self-hosting my own social media platforms (GoToSocial, PeerTube and Pixelfed instances) and I’ve set up essential services like NextCloud… purposefully using domain name registrars, web and VPS hosting companies based in Europe.
The topics of open social networks, FOSS alternatives to Big Tech platforms and European cloud infrastructure are my bread and butter.
I have been alarmed by the hype around the launch of W Social and all the inaccuracies in news reports. Thus my speaking up.
Issue no.1: How W Social ignored existing European initiatives
People in my circles discussed the announcement of W Social with disbelief and a touch of anger. At launch, the official website of W Social showcased a world map, with icons of American tech platforms (Bluesky, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Reddit, Snapchat, TikTok US, Whatsapp, X and YouTube) superimposed over the map of the United States; then over Russia you can see the logos of OK and Vkontakte, over China there is QQ, TikTok, WeChat and Weibo, and over India there is ShareChat. A circle is drawn around Europe... but there are no icons inside. The message: W Social is here to fill that void and provide a European social network.
a screenshot of the initial landing page for W Social on January 21st 2026
This provoked the ire of many of my friends and fellow Fediverse netizens - because decentralized social media platforms like Mastodon and PeerTube originated in Europe; the Fediverse has over 12 million users. Omitting this felt like a strange choice. Even the European Commission has an active Mastodon account: on their own server, with over 154,000 followers!
European Commission (@EUCommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu)
3.58K Posts, 10 Following, 154K Followers · News and information from the European Commission. A project to foster our presence in the fediverse and support our commitment to European social media platforms based on open source technology. 🇪🇺 Official Mastodon account as verified by the official EU domain in our server’s address (https://europa.eu).
European Commission on Mastodon

While most people focused their frustration on that omission, I thought of something else entirely: for months I had been hearing about the development of Eurosky, based on Bluesky's ATproto.
A mission statement, from Eurosky's website (a note: I grabbed this text in January and the page has since changed. But you can see the original courtesy of the Internet Archive):
Eurosky is building the future of social media - open, pluralistic, and made in Europe. We believe social media should serve our economies and societies, not monopolies. Eurosky is a public-interest infrastructure project that puts control in the hands of users, businesses, and European society. By combining European cloud infrastructure with open standards and democratic governance, we’re creating a new ecosystem where innovation thrives, moderation is transparent, and no single company or country can dictate the rules.
a screenshot of Eurosky's website from late January 2026
By reading articles about W Social, you could easily think journalists were discussing Eurosky. The two platforms are so eerily similar in their stated goals, that when I heard that a new European social platform was launching to rival X, when I read it was called "W Social" my first thought was that Eurosky must have rebranded and changed its name. After all, it was supposed to launch in January 2026 and the announcement of W Social was made in Davos on January 20th 2026.
Oh no. They are two completely different initiatives.
Here is what Robin Berjon - one of the architects of Eurosky - had to say about W Social:
a screenshot of a post by Robin Berjon of Eurosky
While the two initiatives share similar goals, their execution could not be more different.
Eurosky has been slowly and carefully planned out, online and behind the scenes. Its website is sleek and professional, with extensive information explaining what the project is about, team bios, a timeline of objectives. When French and German political leaders met in Berlin in November 2025 at the Summit on European Digital Sovereignty to discuss European tech sovereignty plans, Eurosky team members organized their own conference in Berlin as a "side event", in order to show policy makers what they were working on. This is a very well prepared team of experts.
By contrast, if you visited the website of W Social on its launch day, all you had was a rudimentary landing page with a map of Europe and the invitation to enter an invite code. Any 14-year-old with an hour to spare and a free Canva account could have designed something more professional looking.
Now the page has been updated with a slightly sleeker design for its landing page but it is still lacking any content (as of May 7th, 2026):
the landing page of W social on May 7, 2026
W Social's announcement at Davos felt very rushed, with minimal preparation just to get the word out there about their plans and get a leg up in the news cycle about European platforms as alternatives to Big Tech offerings from Silicon Valley.
With work on Eurosky being well under way (they eventually opened migrations to their server from Bluesky in February), I kept wondering: "Why? What is the point of W Social, another European fork of Bluesky?" And then everything clicked: maybe W Social is banking on mandatory age verification for European users in order to use social media. This could be their "leg up" over Eurosky: the need for an official government ID to open an account and use it.
Issue no.2: W Social's bungled attempt to conceal they are using Bluesky's AT Protocol
How will W Social work? Which technology will it employ to power its revolutionary European social network?
You would think journalists would ask these questions.
Sadly, that wasn't the case.
Online sleuths discovered the page stage.wsocial.eu that revealed WSocial is none other than a fork of Bluesky, thus based on ATProto.
Developers typically test out platforms on a staging website before launching or going in production... the staging page for W Social was exactly like the Bluesky login page. If you clicked on the "x" to close that preview window, you would see a Bluesky feed:


screenshots putting the landing page of Bluesky and the staging page for W Social side by side...
a screenshot of W social's early feed from the staging page. basically a Bluesky feed
That page was active for a few days: if you shared a link to it from Signal for example - like I did - you would see a preview card with the Bluesky logo. So much for calling out Bluesky and conflating it with other Big Tech offerings by Meta and ByteDance.

Additional proof: the URL dev-pds.wsocial.eu which showed the ATproto logo and stated "this is an AT Protocol Personal Data Server" (the two URLs have since been migrated):

This Scooby-Doo unmasking meme shared by DoktorZjivago on Mastodon is a perfect illustration for this:

I'm guessing that after catching some flack online – regarding their high aspirations of having a European tech stack but picking the American Bluesky and their protocol – someone in charge of W Social commanded that their staging website scrap all evidence of ATproto.
So the stage.wsocial.eu webpage a few days after the official announcement looked like this:

Issue no.3: W Social's cavalier attitude towards online security
Did you notice anything wrong in the previous screenshot?
Well, the operation scrapping of all Bluesky branding resulted in the loss of the page's SSL certificate.
This is a LOGIN page into their system.
Why is it bad? Well, when you type a password into a webpage that doesn't have a working SSL certificate, the connection between your browser and the website is unencrypted. That means the password travels as plain text across the Internet.
Did I mention that W Social's value proposition is verified identity and they will require a government ID to create an account? They are asking for your most sensitive data... and yet have a cavalier attitude towards security.
On announcement week, Tom Casavant shared these messages on Bluesky about W Social and its dev-pds.wsocial.eu page (I'm sharing this with Tom's permission):

How bad is this?
Potentially catastrophic if the wrong person could so easily gain access into their system.
Am I theorizing about things that may never happen? Sure. But we should all be very careful about the organizations we trust with our most sensitive data. A few months ago a Discord data breach exposed the government IDs of 70,000 users:
Discord Data Breach - 1.5 TB of Data and 2 Million Government ID Photos Extorted
Discord has confirmed a significant data breach that exposed sensitive user information after an attacker compromised a third-party customer service provider.
CybersecurityNewsGuru Baran

Now, I have heard through the grapevines (and read confirmation in the press - more on this later) that W Social hired a team of software engineers and now have more than 20 employees, so I think they are taking things more seriously. Still, their early blunders were really shocking to me.
Issue no.4: the founders or: who are we trusting with our communications?
W Social is being built by a Swedish company called W Social AB, which is a subsidiary of We Don't Have Time, a climate-focused media platform. The W Social project is led by Anna Zeiter, a Swiss privacy expert who previously served as Chief Privacy Officer at eBay for more than a decade; she holds a PhD in law from the University of Hamburg. Not the typical background for a tech founder.
a screenshot of Anna Zeiter's profile as it appears on Bluesky
According to an article on Impact Loop, W Social received 2.5 million Euros in funding and has a team of 25 people. Its board of advisors includes very powerful, well-connected people in the world of business and politics, including Cristina Caffarra (chair of EuroStack), Elizabeth Denham (former UK Information Commissioner), Sandrine Dixson-Declève (Honorary President of the Club of Rome), Yariv Adan (former Head of AI at Google), Pär Nuder (former Swedish Minister of Finance), Marc Placzek (former CPO at PayPal) and Philipp Rösler (former German vice-chancellor).
At Davos, Zeiter was interviewed during a We Don't Have Time segment and had a chance to talk about her intentions for the platform - the video was posted on X, but I am using the alternate site nitter.net to display it (so you won't need an X account to see it):

Direct link: nitter.net/WeDontHaveTime/stat…
Zeiter said:
Everything is data-driven. Ten years ago we said 'data is the new oil', right now we say 'high quality data is the new oil.' And this is what we are seeing, that competitors in the U.S. and China are using a lot of personal data to analyze, to target... and also sometimes to manipulate users. We want to be different in that respect. Of course, we want to respect GDPR and other European laws because we are run, built and governed in Europe and we would also like to give back to the users. We like to give for example, the face identification process, we want to make sure that users can govern their own data and also their own algorithms, so that users can really choose: "do I want to stay in my filter bubble?" or "do I want to see a little bit more of what is going on in society?" or "do I want to have the full spectrum?"
This is their pitch: a social media platform with a pick-your-own algorithm, that requires government ID to sign up.
What I take issue with here is the sentence "we are run, built and governed in Europe." Why hide that they are using the ATproto infrastructure to operate? Theirs is not a novel, completely original, built from the ground up platform. It is based on Bluesky's ATproto. And yet, this protocol has never been mentioned in any interviews.
Software engineer Maho Pacheco theorized:
I have strong suspicions about why W selected ATproto instead of Activity Pub. Basically there is more power in the biggest actors, a more "centralized" control, to ban/shadow-ban/censure and pull the plug. In other words it is more impactful when Bluesky sidebanned someone or some community than if mastodon.social would do it. The firehose/relay is a the biggest point of control. So in my opinion it is more interesting for investors to create a platform that can be controlled, even if it is just to introduce ads or control the discourse. Technically is because setting-up/supporting/maintaining the firehose/relay layer is very expensive. Every single message would flow through there; creating the biggest firehose in Europe is such a power. So, it is easier to be controlled, and very unlikely to be replicated by other entities.
Issue no. 5: lack of transparency
Following their surprise announcement at Davos, there were dozens of news reports in newspapers, radio shows and TV news shows about this "new European network that will replace X" - with strong implications that it may be an official initiative by the European Union.
a screenshot showing articles about W Social on Google News
This went on for TEN DAYS - with zero fact checking by media organizations or corrections by the W Social founders.
The first news organization to fact check and debunk the myth of official involvement by the European Union was Euronews. In a segment for The Cube (which you could watch here), journalist James Thomas said:
Claims are spreading online like wildfire that the European Union is setting up its own social media platform to rival X. These posts have spread primarily on X itself, with thousands of views and say that taxpayers money will be used to set up W as an alternative to Elon Musk's platform. Some posts describe it as a state-run censorship platform that has receive funding from the European executive, but these claims are misleading. A European Commission spokesperson told The Cube that the EU is not launching, funding or operating any social media platform. There is no European-backed projected called "W".
This came ten days too late, with dozens of news reports legitimizing W as an official European alternative to X.
Let's do some role-playing here: if I were to launch a privately funded project that received extensive media coverage in newspapers, on the radio and TV, but with reports wrongly claiming that the government was behind it... well, the first thing I would do would be to contact journalists to rectify the mistake. I may even put text on my website to correct the assumptions.
W did not do that. I will always remember their silence on this.
I am not sure I can fully trust an initiative that lacked clarity and honesty on two crucial points:
- hiding that they are a fork of Bluesky;
- not correcting wrong claims about their origins, letting people believe that they are part of a European Union initiative - whereas in reality they are a private venture, funded by private investors.
And then there is the thorny issue of their required ID verification, the erosion of privacy and the end of internet anonymity. Em wrote an excellent article pointing out the problems with age verification laws for social media users - it is a must read and covers many of the reasons why government IDs to use social media is a very bad idea:
Age Verification Wants Your Face, and Your Privacy
Age verification laws forcing platforms to restrict access to content online have been multiplying in recent years. The problem is, implementing such measure necessarily requires identifying each user accessing this content, one way or another. This is bad news for your privacy.
Privacy GuidesEm

The Electronic Frontier Foundation also has a superb piece about this topic:
10 (Not So) Hidden Dangers of Age Verification
It’s nearly the end of 2025, and half of the US and the UK now require you to upload your ID or scan your face to watch “sexual content.” A handful of states and Australia now have various requirements to verify your age before you can create a social media account.Age-verification laws may sound…
Electronic Frontier FoundationRindala Alajaji

Final Thoughts
I have a lot more to say about this but I realize that in this post-literate era I have already written a very long post that will take time to read and fully digest. I will stop here - for now. W Social is set to launch tomorrow May 9th on Europe Day. As it happened when it was first announced in January, it is likely to receive a lot of uncritical, superficial press coverage. Please exercise critical thinking and try to look at the reality behind its hype. And if you are not familiar with open social networks, please take a look at a better option: the Fediverse.
Thanks for being here,
Elena

💓 Did you enjoy this post? Share it with a friend!
👫 Follow me on Mastodon. All my other links are available here: elena.social
💌 If you'd like to say hi, my contact information is here
✏️ If this post resonated with you, leave a comment!
Contact Elena Rossini: use the contact form on this page to get in touch with Elena – interview requests, speaking gigs, freelance assignments...
Elena Rossini
AAA Trans Pirate
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •Roknrol
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •When I was packing up all of my shit to move to France, I took half of our televisions (LCD, nothing special, but large and *dumb*).
My wife laughed and suggested that I was being silly by not just buying new televisions when I made it across the pond.
The last time I was in her house I heard so many advertisements, so many "AI Assistants" listening, and she (a supposed liberal) has a fucking Ring doorbell.
I'm happy with my dumb TVs, my dumb DVD players, my dumb media server, my dumb record player, and my dumb doorbell.
Before I buy anything "smart" I will first find out how the "smart" can be disabled (the fridge we bought was 'wifi capable', so I opened the back and yanked the wifi card - that trick probably won't work anymore).
gkrnours
in reply to Roknrol • • •Pretty sure they had a "smart" player, as in "skip the ads"
❄️SnowyIn❄️ 🇨🇦🚫🦻
in reply to gkrnours • • •We have several boxes of oldish DVDs and none have a commercial...I don't remember seeing ads on DVDs.
The Doctor
in reply to ❄️SnowyIn❄️ 🇨🇦🚫🦻 • • •gkrnours
in reply to ❄️SnowyIn❄️ 🇨🇦🚫🦻 • • •❄️SnowyIn❄️ 🇨🇦🚫🦻
in reply to gkrnours • • •"regional"
I was wondering the same.
Roknrol
in reply to gkrnours • • •@gkrnours Almost all of my DVDs have been ripped from original disks with all of the preview crap and advertisements cut.
The disks will soon start failing though, so I'll need to dedicate some time to re-ripping them lest I lose my catalog lol
@alice
acb
in reply to Roknrol • • •@roknrol My TV is a 2006 model, bought in 2018 from an old Kurdish man in the banlieues of Stockholm. It has one HDMI port, some analogue ports that look like dogshit with consoles, a VGA port(!) and an analogue tuner that no longer has a use. It (coupled with a HDMI switch) does the job.
I’m told that denying internet access to modern “smart TVs” is not an option, as they will nag you obstructively until you plug them in, as they’re sold at a loss recouped from ad/tracker revenue.
Roknrol
in reply to acb • • •@acb That is what I heard as well, and every story gives me a small reason for a sigh of relief.
@alice
V'ger
in reply to Roknrol • • •Arratoon
in reply to Roknrol • • •Sensitive content
Nenon
in reply to Roknrol • • •@roknrol check "
"digital signage displays", they might fit your needs better. 😀
Roknrol
in reply to Nenon • • •Spoontaneous Consumption
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •One day, you won't be able to pay for your groceries because you don't have a smartphone that uses AI to solve the captchas at the checkout terminal and the AI teller won't accept your wrinkly cash.
And then you'll walk out of the store with your stolen groceries but the door won't open until someone else walks out because 'smart'.
And then you won't have paid for your food and nobody will be after you because they'd try to punish you by locking you out of their discount program instead.
And then you'll be a thief and you'll feel really bad because of that only because you didn't buy smart devices.
At least that's what I expect to happen to me 😅 And after feeling bad there's free food.
Karsten Sandmand
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •The Doctor
in reply to Karsten Sandmand • • •Peter Gray (per/per) 🚲🏞🎷🏠🌿
in reply to Karsten Sandmand • • •WTL
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •Cavyherd
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •eestileib (she/hers)
in reply to Cavyherd • • •I am very glad to have a stand mixer and a fridge and running water, those are pretty damn convenient.
Jer-Bear 😎🐻
in reply to eestileib (she/hers) • • •@eestileib Yes but there is no good reason for any of those to connect to the Internet
@cavyherd @alice
Juniper likes skunks
in reply to Jer-Bear 😎🐻 • • •I can think of some reason I might want some appliances to connect to the network (not necessarily the Internet) if only capitalism didn't take that as an excuse to prevent me having control of those devices.
@eestileib @cavyherd @alice
Brokar
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •Janneke
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •Marketing lingo, who doesn't hate it?
Who are these people that have no problem whatsoever lying to us?
Jesse McClure
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •Smart people know they will be happy with simple devices.
Simple people think they will be happy with smart devices.
Ganondalf
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •Tom 🇨🇦
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •In my experience "smart" cars are quirky, occasionally unpredictable and subject to subscription-based enshittification
None of these are traits I want in a car. At all.
Nicole Parsons
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •StarkRG
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •Robot Diver 🌊🌬️🍃🌿🌸🌱🌱🌱
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •gary
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •the anti ai rant leads you to a place where you are compromised and it is just a negative space, i'd rather go hybrid and look at things a bit more realistically and subjectively
Altbot
in reply to gary • • •@gary_alderson This bot has been asked to generate an alt text for your image by @alice. If you consent, you will grant altbot a one-time permission to process this specific post. All processing is done privately with no third-parties. Any and all content is deleted after processing.
The full privacy policy: github.com/micr0-dev/Altbot/bl…
Do you consent? Reply with 'Y' or 'Yes' to proceed.
Altbot/PRIVACY.md at main · micr0-dev/Altbot
GitHubEmory
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •James Donohoe
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •I dread the day I have to replace my old TV - my plan is to buy a large computer monitor instead though I expect it will be more expensive.
ente
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •Sue Briccay
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •There is a definite gap in the market for 'dumb' products.
#LudditesRus
Mungen Cakes ✅
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •Plutarch
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •Dizzy 0069 Stiff Assed Crip
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •The Doctor
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •❄️SnowyIn❄️ 🇨🇦🚫🦻
Unknown parent • • •I hear that. Do you think it regional? ?By country, I mean...
@gkrnours @roknrol
Andrew Zonenberg
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •I work in computer security and do a lot of work on automotive stuff.
People ask me what I think of self-driving cars.
I tell them I get to work on a bicycle. The smartest thing on it is the USB charge controller for my headlight and if it makes a funny noise or starts smoking I can yank it off the handlebars and yeet it somewhere far away from me.
Andrew Zonenberg
in reply to Andrew Zonenberg • • •If I am ever forced to buy a 2015+ vehicle (or whenever they started putting telematics on cars) due to lack of alternatives, you can bet I am going to go bumper to bumper with a spectrum analyzer and nearfield probe set and neutralize every radio transmitter on the car by any means necessary.
Removing the entire ECU? Cutting traces to the antenna and replacing them with a 50-ohm terminator? High voltage into the antenna until it stops responding?
One way or another, it won't phone home. But the longer it takes and the more work it requires, the more pissed I'll be.
Andrew Zonenberg
in reply to Andrew Zonenberg • • •Mr. Scam Likely
in reply to Andrew Zonenberg • • •@azonenberg I've got a sturdy 20+ year old sedan, and I'm realizing I should just plan to keep it running forever as long as the frame is intact.
Theres decades of compatible parts lying around in warehouses and junkyards, and I don't care if I have to swap an engine that isn't "compatible" and custom mount it. That sounds better than a new surveillance-mobile.
Andrew Zonenberg
in reply to Mr. Scam Likely • • •@unlofl I'm hoping one day a bunch of angry nerds will design either an entire suite of new electronics/controls for a popular late model vehicle, or better yet an entirely new vehicle, that is simple, low tech, repairable, and open source to the extent practical.
Rip out the CAN bus controlled door locks and replace them with ones that use physical keys that don't need batteries.
Remove the touchscreen HVAC controls and put in physical knobs.
No fly-by-wire anywhere except where required to perform a key safety function like ABS. If you have to put software between human control inputs and steering/braking/acceleration, it should be as minimal as possible, formally verified, and multiply redundant processors, sensors, and actuators.
Publish full mechanical drawings of common wear components to make third party replacements easier and allow the vehicles to outlive the manufacturers if they later go out of business.
No ADAS features whatsoever.
Iris Young (he/they/she) (PhD) reshared this.
divVerent
in reply to Andrew Zonenberg • • •You can, but that is likely illegal. In Germany even twice illegal:
- Operating a bicycle without a light
- Littering
Obviously, if the Li-Ion battery started smoking, that'd count as a justified emergency. Although it can be quite tricky to figure out where thou lobbest thy holy hand grenade of Li-Ion, if no qualified foe is nearby.
Najmies
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •Quinn Norton
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •Vysogota
in reply to Quinn Norton • • •Quinn Norton
in reply to Vysogota • • •I will cut you
😂
Aisling "cromulent fuckcrustable of a deer" Fawn
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •kabel42
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •Tom 🇨🇦
Unknown parent • • •Zimmie
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •I want my car to be smart. I want it to have enough sensors it can diagnose problems for me. “Rear-left tower accelerometer says your shock is blown.” Unfortunately most seem to only diagnose problems for the manufacturer, not for the owner. Big displays in the dash, but nobody seems to include even a code reader the owner can access directly on the car.
I really like my water leak detectors and smoke alarms which can send notifications to my phone while I’m out.
It sucks that “smart” has been so routinely abused to mean “dumb to the point it won’t function without an Internet connection”.
❄️SnowyIn❄️ 🇨🇦🚫🦻
Unknown parent • • •@gkrnours @roknrol
"speedrunning..."
Canada has the same problem.
Our PM is making sure we burn the planert.
James Donohoe
Unknown parent • • •local cat
Unknown parent • • •Juniper likes skunks
Unknown parent • • •@jerbear @eestileib @cavyherd
VANTABlack
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •These days "Smart" devices feels like 1 of 2 things "A ticking time bomb waiting to suddenly require a subscription" and/or "A spying device collecting as much data as it can to sell"
And in the special case of a certain smart mattress brand I can't remember the name of "Overheats when AWS goes down" lol.
Stryder Notavi
in reply to VANTABlack • • •Tom 🇨🇦
Unknown parent • • •Ada (Redemption Arc) 🏳️⚧️
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •Brokar
Unknown parent • • •The hammer is only for printers. I read that somewhere 😉
And yes, i could never understand how people could install Ring cams on their doors or put something like Alexa in their kitchens.
They basically beg to get spied on and are upset if somebody actually does.
Tesla? Same thing.
I drive a 20 year old car. Repairs are becoming expensive because spare parts are becoming rare, but the car is mine.
🟥 Eveline Sulman 🇳🇱🇪🇺🇺🇦
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •Kirtai 🏳️⚧️
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •[17921] /bin/cat(girl)
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •EndlessMason
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •solo
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •tbh at this point I don't trust anything unless I can modify all of the software running on it however I see fit.
either that, or it is not permitted to have an internet connection.