Die KI-Verordnung der EU lässt wichtige Fragen der Regulierung von Künstlicher Intelligenz offen. Aus diesem Grund hat die EU-Kommission gestern Leitlinien zum Gesetz veröffentlicht. Doch auch die bleiben uneindeutig, vor allem bei den Themen biometrische Überwachung und Social Scoring. Auch eine Definition von KI fehlt weiterhin.
Privacy Pride reshared this.
EDRi
in reply to EDRi • • •2/3 ... Member States are now taking advantage of these weak bans to push for dangerous laws at a national level. This includes legalising #MassSurveillance through Remote Biometric Identification (RBI) systems 🙅♂️
🇧🇪 This is happening at the very centre of the EU - Belgium is proposing a full copy paste of the AI Act exceptions to the RBI ban!
This is exactly we warned about when the #AIAct passed - it will lead to legalisation of massive #HumanRights violations ⤵️ edri.org/our-work/eu-ai-act-fa…
EU’s AI Act fails to set gold standard for human rights - European Digital Rights (EDRi)
European Digital Rights (EDRi)nimi reshared this.
EDRi
in reply to EDRi • • •3/3 There's also the procedural mess:
❌ delays from the #AIOffice
❌ national implementation delays
❌ #GPAI code of conduct issues
❌ Commission's interpretative guidelines released AFTER bans already entered into force
❌ no guidelines on the AI system definition yet, which will determine which systems fall under the scope of the bans in the first place.
This is terrible for legal certainty, in addition to the #AIAct already falling short of civil society demands to put people's rights first.