Fight for press freedom as ICE attacks Chicago
Press freedom wins in Chicago court, but fight continues
Chicago journalists won a big First Amendment victory Oct. 9, when a federal court temporarily curbed federal officers’ abuses at protests. But the fight isn’t over.
The order still allows officers to potentially remove journalists along with protesters, a serious threat to press freedom that must be fixed.
We also can’t rely on courts alone. Local officials must step up, especially to protect independent journalists, who’ve been the main targets of these violations.
That’s why Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) led a coalition letter urging the Broadview, Illinois, Police Department and Illinois State Police to investigate attacks on independent journalists covering protests.
Read more about the order here.
Strengthen presidential library transparency
A segment on “Last Week Tonight with John Oliver” about corruption and secrecy surrounding presidential libraries cited FPF’s Lauren Harper, who has been warning about Trump’s purported library since before his inauguration.
Oliver is right. Secret donations to presidential libraries enable bribery, while public access to presidential records is at an all-time low. Use our action center tool to tell Congress to close the secrecy loopholes and increase transparency.
Army lawyer thinks journalists are stenographers
The Pentagon attempted to walk back its policy restricting reporters from publishing news the government doesn’t authorize. But the revised policy is still a nonstarter to which no journalist should agree.
Meanwhile, a nominee for general counsel for the Department of the Army, Charles L. Young III, effectively endorsed the unconstitutional restrictions during a Senate hearing this week, opining that the First Amendment authorizes the government to punish journalists for publishing information that it did not approve for public release.
That’s disqualifying. A journalist’s job isn’t to keep the government’s secrets. It’s to report news the government does not want reported.
Tell Congress to reject Young’s nomination.
State Department must stand up for journalists detained on flotillas
Israel continues to hold American journalists captured in international waters aboard aid flotillas. The latest are Jewish Currents reporter Emily Wilder and Drop Site News reporter Noa Avishag Schnall. Previously, Israel detained Drop Site News reporter Alex Colston, who has said he and other detainees were abused and denied medical care.
But the State Department is doing little if anything about these detainments, presumably because the journalists in question don’t agree with the administration’s policies. Lawmakers need to raise their voices and pressure the administration to do more.
Write to your member of Congress here.
Student journalists fight Trump’s anti-speech deportations
It’s not every day a student newspaper takes on the federal government. But that’s exactly what The Stanford Daily is doing.
The Daily sued Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem in August over the Trump administration’s push to deport foreign students for exercising free speech, like writing op-eds and attending protests.
We spoke at the start of Stanford University’s fall term with Editor-in-Chief Greta Reich about why the Daily is fighting back. Read more here.
It’s time to end the SEC gag rule
We’ve written before about the unconstitutionality of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s “gag rule,” which bars those who settle with the SEC from talking to reporters, to protect the SEC’s reputation.
We shouldn’t need to say this, but the government doesn’t get to censor its critics to make itself look good. Last week, we filed a legal brief explaining to a federal appellate court why the ridiculous rule must be struck down. Read the brief here.
What we’re reading
ICE goes masked for a single reason (The New York Times). FPF’s Adam Rose tells the Times that immigration officers “seem to feel they can just willy-nilly shoot tear gas canisters at people and shoot them with foam rounds that can permanently maim people.”
The New York Times wins right to obtain info Musk wanted kept private (The New Republic). A court ruled that the public’s interest in knowing if Elon Musk has a security clearance and access to classified information outweighs any potential privacy interests.
Press Freedom Partnership newsletter (The Washington Post). “Journalists who are considering covering the story are going to think twice about it and stay home because they don’t want to be jailed and shot. It’s a major problem,” we told the Post about law enforcement targeting journalists covering anti-deportation protests in and around Chicago.
Journalism has become more challenging, for reporters and sources (Sentient). Sources have backed out of news stories — even seemingly uncontroversial ones — out of fear of being targeted by the Trump administration.
MAGA slams ‘fake news’ but embraces ‘The Benny Show’s’ misinformation (Straight Arrow News). “Plenty of past presidents would have loved to exclude serious journalists … and bring in the Benny Johnsons of their time. They just were under the impression that the public wouldn’t tolerate that,” we told Straight Arrow News. Now it’s up to the public to prove those past presidents right and the current one wrong.
A Function Generator From The Past
It’s always a pleasure to find a hardware hacker who you haven’t seen before, and page back through their work. [Bettina Neumryr]’s niche comes in building projects from old electronics magazines, and her latest, a function generator from the British Everyday Electronics magazine in April 1983, is a typical build.
The project uses the XR2206 function generator chip, a favourite of the time. It contains a current controlled oscillator and waveform shaper, and can easily produce square, triangle, and sine waves. It was always a puzzle back in the day why this chip existed as surely the global market for function generators can’t have been that large, however a little bit of background reading for this write-up reveals that its intended application was for producing frequency-shift-keyed sinusoidal tones.
The EE project pairs the XR2206 with an op-amp current generator to control the frequency, and another op-amp as an amplifier and signal conditioner. The power supply is typical of the time too, a mains transformer, rectifier, and linear regulators. There are a pair of very period PCBs supplied as print-outs in the magazine for home etching. This she duly does, though with toner transfer which would have been unheard of in 1983. After a few issues with faulty pots and a miswired switch, she has a working function generator which she puts in a very period project box.
It’s interesting to look at this and muse on what’s changed in electronic construction at our level in the last four decades. The PCB is single sided and has that characteristic yellow of ferric chloride etching, it takes up several times the space achievable with the same parts on the professionally-made dual-sided board designed using a modern PCB CAD package we’d use today. A modern take on the same project would probably use a microcontroller and a DAC, and a small switch-mode supply for less money than that transformer would provide the power. But we like the 1983 approach, and we commend [Bettina] for taking it on. The full video is below the break.
youtube.com/embed/CIuWX-6ER_8?…
Microsoft Defender segnala erroneamente SQL Server 2019 in End Of Life
Sappiamo bene che la fine del supporto dei prodotti (End of Life) comporta rischi di sicurezza e l’accumulo di vulnerabilità, poiché i produttori smettono di rilasciare patch correttive. Tuttavia, avviare un replatforming con cinque anni di anticipo appare una scelta forse eccessiva.
Microsoft sta lavorando per correggere un bug nella sua piattaforma di sicurezza aziendale Defender for Endpoint che causava la segnalazione errata da parte del software di sicurezza di SQL Server 2017 e 2019 come “obsoleti”.
BleepingComputer segnala che l’interruzione ha interessato i clienti di Defender XDR già mercoledì mattina. Microsoft stessa conferma che SQL Server 2019 sarà supportato fino a gennaio 2030 e SQL Server 2017 fino a ottobre 2027.
L’errore si è verificato a causa di un recente aggiornamento del codice relativo al sistema di rilevamento dei programmi “di fine supporto” (EoL), ovvero programmi il cui periodo di supporto è scaduto.
Di conseguenza, Defender ha contrassegnato erroneamente le versioni correnti di SQL Server come obsolete. “Gli utenti con SQL Server 2019 e 2017 installati potrebbero visualizzare etichette errate nella sezione Gestione minacce e vulnerabilità. Abbiamo già iniziato a distribuire una correzione che annullerà le modifiche errate”, ha riferito Microsoft.
L’azienda ha chiarito che il problema potrebbe riguardare tutti i clienti che utilizzano SQL Server 2017 e 2019, ma che si tratta di un incidente di portata limitata. Microsoft ha promesso di pubblicare un programma per l’implementazione completa della correzione non appena sarà pronta. Non è la prima volta che Defender for Endpoint risponde erroneamente agli aggiornamenti.
Una settimana prima, il prodotto aveva identificato erroneamente il BIOS di alcuni dispositivi Dell come obsoleto, richiedendo un aggiornamento inesistente.
All’inizio di settembre, l’azienda ha affrontato un altro problema: i falsi positivi del suo servizio antispam, che impedivano agli utenti di Exchange Online e Microsoft Teams di aprire i link nelle e-mail e nelle chat. Sembra che gli ingegneri Microsoft abbiano avuto un autunno particolarmente caldo.
L'articolo Microsoft Defender segnala erroneamente SQL Server 2019 in End Of Life proviene da il blog della sicurezza informatica.
Court backs Chicago reporters, but leaves door open for dispersals
A federal judge just reminded the government that the First Amendment still applies in Chicago.
On Oct. 9, Chicago journalists and protesters scored a major legal win, when Judge Sara Ellis issued a temporary restraining order reigning in federal officers’ repeated First Amendment violations at protests.
It’s a big victory for press freedom. The order prohibits arrests and use of physical force against journalists and restricts the use of dangerous crowd-control munitions. It defines “journalists” broadly, in a way that includes independent, freelance, and student reporters. It also enhances transparency by requiring federal officers to wear “visible identification,” like a unique serial number.
This order and similar rulings in Los Angeles last month are powerful reminders that journalists working together can vindicate their rights in the courts. They also highlight the crucial role that independent journalists and smaller news organizations play in defending press freedom. In both Chicago and Los Angeles, it’s been freelancers, community news outlets, local press clubs, and unions who’ve taken the lead, teaming up with protesters, legal observers, and clergy to take the government to court.
Unconstitutional dispersals of press still possible
But the fight isn’t over. The Chicago order unfortunately leaves open the possibility that, at least in some instances, federal officers may order journalists to leave areas where protests are being broken up or officers are attacking protesters.
Although the order prohibits dispersal of journalists from protests as a general matter, it also states that officers can “order” journalists to “change location to avoid disrupting law enforcement,” as long as they have “an objectively reasonable time to comply and an objectively reasonable opportunity to report and observe.” (In contrast, a similar order in Los Angeles states only that federal officers may “ask” journalists to change location.)
Federal officers are likely to use this as a loophole to continue to violently remove the press from protests, on the pretext that it’s necessary to avoid disruption. The order’s requirement that press must be able to continue to report and observe is also too lax; far better would have been an order specifically requiring that press be able to continue to see and hear the protest and law enforcement response.
Even when police can disperse protesters who break the law, the First Amendment doesn’t allow them to disperse journalists, too.
The weaker language around dispersals of journalists in the court’s order is a shame, especially for the public’s right to know. In recent days, Chicago journalists have been reporting about the violent tactics used by federal agents to disperse protests. If journalists can be ordered to leave alongside protesters, they can’t observe what’s happening or capture the images they need to keep the public informed.
It also makes dispersals more dangerous for protesters. As Unraveled Press noted, “Again and again, we’ve seen cops are most likely to get more violent with demonstrators when out of public view.” (Unraveled Press co-founder Raven Geary is a plaintiff in the Chicago lawsuit.) And while the court’s order prohibits dispersal orders aimed at peaceful protesters, if federal officers violate that order and also disperse the press to avoid a “disruption,” it will be much harder for the public to learn about it.
By declining to simply prohibit federal officers from dispersing the press, except when necessary to serve an essential government need such as public safety, the court also got the law wrong. Even when police can disperse protesters who break the law, the First Amendment doesn’t allow them to disperse journalists, too.
We’re not the only ones who say so. Just last year, the Department of Justice issued guidance stating as much:
“In the case of mass demonstrations, there may be situations—such as dispersal orders or curfews—where the police may reasonably limit public access. In these circumstances, to ensure that these limitations are narrowly tailored, the police may need to exempt reporters from these restrictions. …”
The DOJ also said so in a previous report, reprimanding the Minneapolis Police Department for its suppression of protesters and the press following George Floyd’s murder:
“The First Amendment requires that any restrictions on when, where, and how reporters gather information ‘leave open ample alternative channels’ for gathering the news. Blanket enforcement of dispersal orders and curfews against press violates this principle because they foreclose the press from reporting about what happens after the dispersal or curfew is issued, including how police enforce those orders.”
And in an important decision from 2020, the federal court of appeals in the 9th Circuit also disapproved of blanket dispersal orders being enforced against the press. That case arose from very similar circumstances to those today: federal authorities abusing the First Amendment while policing federal property during Black Lives Matter protests in Portland, Oregon.
In the 2020 case, the 9th Circuit affirmed a legal order that exempted journalists from general dispersal orders issued by the federal government. Journalists, it wrote, “cannot be punished for the violent acts of others.”
These authorities make it clear: Journalists cannot be ordered to move simply because it would be more convenient for officers. Journalists can only be dispersed if it’s essential to a compelling government interest, and only if they continue to have another vantage point from which they can see and hear what’s going on in order to report.
It’s frustrating that the court’s order leaves the door open for the government to evade this well-established principle. But the fight isn’t over. The court’s temporary restraining order is just a first step. When it issues a more permanent ruling, it will have another opportunity to get the prohibition on dispersing the press right.
La convenienza di limitare il pensiero
@Giornalismo e disordine informativo
articolo21.org/2025/10/la-conv…
Leggiamo ciò che siamo e leggiamo sempre meno. A dilrlo, già nel maggio scorso durante il Salone del libro di Torino l’Associazione Italiana Editori (AIE) che aveva rilevato come l’andamento dell’editoria stesse subendo un calo importante delle vendite,
Hackaday Podcast Episode 341: Qualcomm Owns Arduino, Steppers Still Dominate 3D Printing, and Google Controls Your Apps
The nights are drawing in for Europeans, and Elliot Williams is joined this week by Jenny List for an evening podcast looking at the past week in all things Hackaday. After reminding listeners of the upcoming Hackaday Supercon and Jawncon events, we take a moment to mark the sad passing of the prolific YouTuber, Robert Murray-Smith.
Before diving into the real hacks, there are a couple of more general news stories with an effect on our community. First, the takeover of Arduino by Qualcomm, and what its effect is likely to be. We try to speculate as to where the Arduino platform might go from here, and even whether it remains the player it once was, in 2025. Then there’s the decision by Google to restrict Android sideloading to only approved-developer APKs unless over ADB. It’s an assault on a user’s rights over their own hardware, as well as something of a blow to the open-source Android ecosystem. What will be our community’s response?
On more familiar territory we have custom LCDs, algorithmic art, and a discussion of non-stepper motors in 3D printing. Even the MakerBot Cupcake makes an appearance. Then there’s a tiny RV, new creative use of an ESP32 peripheral, and the DVD logo screensaver, in hardware. We end the show with a look at why logic circuits use the voltages they do. It’s a smorgasbord of hacks for your listening enjoyment.
html5-player.libsyn.com/embed/…
Download yourself an MP3 even without a Hackaday Listeners’ License.
Where to Follow Hackaday Podcast
Places to follow Hackaday podcasts:
Episode 341 Show Notes:
News:
- 2025 Hackaday Supercon: More Wonderful Speakers
- JawnCon Returns This Weekend
- Honoring The Legacy Of Robert Murray-Smith
What’s that Sound?
- Fill in the form with your best guess to be entered to win next week.
Interesting Hacks of the Week:
- Qualcomm Introduces The Arduino Uno Q Linux-Capable SBC
- Google Confirms Non-ADB APK Installs Will Require Developer Registration
- Mesmerizing Patterns From Simple Rules
- How To Design Custom LCDs For Your Own Projects
- Why Stepper Motors Still Dominate 3D Printing
- How Your SID May Not Be As Tuneful As You’d Like
Quick Hacks:
- Elliot’s Picks:
- A Childhood Dream, Created And Open Sourced
- Tips For C Programming From Nic Barker
- Finding Simpler Schlieren Imaging Systems
- Jenny’s Picks:
- Building The DVD Logo Screensaver With LEGO
- ESP32 Decodes S/PDIF Like A Boss (Or Any Regular Piece Of Hi-Fi Equipment)
- Kei Truck Becomes Tiny RV
Can’t-Miss Articles:
hackaday.com/2025/10/10/hackad…
QUIC! Jump to User Space!
Everyone knows that Weird Al lampooned computers in a famous parody song (It’s All About the Pentiums). But if you want more hardcore (including more hardcore language, so if you are offended by rap music-style explicit lyrics, maybe don’t look this up), you probably want “Kill Dash 9” by Monzy. There’s a line in that song about “You thought the seven-layer model referred to a burrito.” In fact, it refers to how networking applications operate, and it is so ingrained that you don’t even hear about it much these days. But as [Codemia] points out, QUIC aims to disrupt the model, and for good reason.
Historically, your application (at layer 7) interacts with the network through other layers like the presentation layer and session layer. At layer 4, though, there is the transport layer where two names come into play: TCP and UDP. Generally, UDP is useful where you want to send data and you don’t expect the system to do much. Data might show up at its destination. Or not. Or it might show up multiple times. It might show up in the wrong order. TCP solves all that, but you have little control over how it does that.
When things are congested, there are different strategies TCP can use, but changing them can be difficult. That’s where QUIC comes in. It is like a user-space TCP layer built over a UDP transport. There are a lot of advantages to that, and if you want to know more, or even just want a good overview of network congestion control mitigations, check the post out.
If you want to know more about congestion control, catch a wave.
Wizard Bisan, oggi
Wizard Bisan
A historic day that I still can't believe it happened, I am out of my mind.. it's so painful, heartbreaking, but yet inevitable.Telegram
This week, we discuss a ransomware gang, book bans, and infrastructure.
This week, we discuss a ransomware gang, book bans, and infrastructure.#BehindTheBlog
Behind the Blog: Sinkholes and Site Seizures
This is Behind the Blog, where we share our behind-the-scenes thoughts about how a few of our top stories of the week came together. This week, we discuss a ransomware gang, book bans, and infrastructure.JOSEPH: I thought I’d give you something from the digital underground that happened last night. So recently a group that goes by the name Scattered LAPSUS$ Hunters (I know, it’s a mouthful) has been threatening to dump data from customers of Salesforce. The group’s name is an amalgamation of a bunch of other English-speaking loosely connected hacking groups: Scattered Spider, LAPSUS$, Shiny Hunters, etc. This latest iteration is trying to get Salesforce to pay a ransom; Salesforce says it won’t. The group says it has data from all sorts of companies, including Disney/Hulu, FedEx, Toyota, UPS, and many more.
This post is for subscribers only
Become a member to get access to all content
Subscribe now
Il Senato sblocca 914 miliardi e rilancia la strategia Usa di difesa
@Notizie dall'Italia e dal mondo
Dopo settimane di stallo procedurale, il Senato degli Stati Uniti ha approvato a larga maggioranza la propria versione del National defense authorization act (Ndaa), riportando il dossier difesa al centro dell’agenda di Washington. La mossa sblocca il confronto con la Camera e apre
Dpp, luci e ombre del nuovo documento strategico della Difesa. L’analisi del gen. Camporini
@Notizie dall'Italia e dal mondo
In questi giorni le Camere hanno ricevuto il nuovo Documento programmatico pluriennale (Dpp) della Difesa 2025-2027. La pubblicazione del documento, prodotto dal ministero della Difesa, rappresenta un appuntamento annuale di grande importanza per analizzare le
Intercettato nel Dark Web un exploit per Cisco FMC: quali impatti
@Informatica (Italy e non Italy 😁)
I ricercatori di Cyberoo hanno individuato una potenziale minaccia che potrebbe interessare migliaia di infrastrutture IT. È in vendita per 500.000 dollari
L'articolo Intercettato nel Dark Web un exploit per Cisco FMC: quali impatti proviene da Cyber Security 360.
agi.it/estero/news/2025-10-10/…
come può una persona così poco umile che pretende il nobel meritare il nobel? questo è quello che succede a nominare presidente degli stati uniti una persona con l'età mentale di 3 anni...