Every Thursday of the week, Bastian’s Night is broadcast from 21:30 CET.
Bastian’s Night is a live talk show in German with lots of music, a weekly round-up of news from around the world, and a glimpse into the host’s crazy week in the pirate movement.
Le Monde consacre un article à nos révélations d'hier sur le fichier TES et les accès abusifs de la police à cette base de données contenant photos et empreintes digitales. On y apprend qu'un policier « confirme ne pas se priver de cet outil, dont l’utilisation ne leur a jamais été formellement interdite »...
L’association la Quadrature du Net, qui a saisi la Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés, dénonce l’exploitation des données de ce fichier par des policiers, qui regroupe de nombreuses données sensibles.
🇩🇪Regierungsbotschafter sollen morgen ohne Diskussion Verhandlungsmandat zur #Chatkontrolle beschließen mit "freiwilligen" Massenscans und anonymitätszerstörender Alterskontrolle. parlament.gv.at/dokument/XXVII…
🇫🇷 Französisch: Traduction du dossier Chat Control 2.0 🇸🇪 Schwedisch: Chat Control 2.0🇳🇱 Niederländisch: Chatcontrole
Inhalt der Seite:
Die Abschaffung des Digitalen Briefgeheimnisses
Hilf jetzt mit die Chatkontrolle zu stoppen…
🇪🇺EU government ambassadors set to adopt #ChatControl negotiating mandate tomorrow without discussion, including "voluntary" mass scanning and anonymity-destroying age verification. parlament.gv.at/dokument/XXVII…
🇮🇹Domani gli ambasciatori UE adottano senza dibattito il mandato #ChatControl: scansione massa "volontaria" & verifica età anti-anonimato. parlament.gv.at/dokument/XXVII…
Hi Patrick - Dutch Parliament just passed a motion demanding that the government change its position to "against" for that vote. Government almost always follows such motions. But not always!
Zur Chatkontrolle ist zu sagen: Diese Beschlüsse wirken wie „Sicherheit“, sind aber ein Symptom systemischer Überforderung. Wenn Staaten Massenscans und Anonymitätsabbau fordern, zeigt das vor allem eines: Sie vertrauen ihren Bürgern immer weniger und versuchen Kontrolle dort zu erzwingen, wo eigentlich Vertrauen bräuchte. Reflex, statt Reflexion.
2/2 In 2026, the Commission is preparing even broader expansions of Europol and Frontex powers, deepening the criminalisation of migration, solidarity, and dissent.
The fight is not over.
✊🏾 As #ProtectNotSurveil, we’re building collective resistance to stop the expansion of the EU’s digital surveillance state and to protect everyone’s rights and safety.
C'EST PAS DE
L'IA
Quand on entend parler d'intelligence artificielle, c'est l'histoire d'un mythe moderne qui nous est racontée. Celui d'une IA miraculeuse qui doit sauver le monde, ou d'une IA douée de volonté qui voudrait le détruire.
1929-1932, alors que Hitler tente de s'emparer du pouvoir par les urnes, les correspondants de presse étrangers, parmi les plus grandes plumes de l'époque, assistent à la montée progressive du nazisme et à l'effondrement final de la république allema…
Ecco il "Garante dell'infanzia"... Oltre a essere tra i principali sponsor di #chatcontrol decide di pubblicare un questionario rivolto ai ragazzi, ma la #Privacy Policy riguarda un altro questionario... 🤦🏾♂️
QUESTIONARIO “GUERRA E CONFLITTI” Abilita JavaScript nel browser per completare questo modulo.Abilita JavaScript nel browser per completare questo modulo.
For those deeply involved with cybersecurity, the past few years have seen a dramatic rise in sophisticated phishing campaigns leveraging social engineering to deliver malware onto unsuspecting victims.
HashiCorp’s Vault Terraform provider, a cornerstone of secure secrets management for organizations worldwide, has been found with a critical security flaw.
Il nostro mitico @puria terrà un Workshop di Type Design @ La Scuola Open Source nel weekend. Sarà una roba molto fica e atipica, forse a qualcun* può interessare qui, poggio il link per iscriversi (si può partecipare sia in presenza a Bari che da remoto)
A new wave of malware targeting cryptocurrency users is hitting developers hard, showcasing the growing sophistication and accessibility of attacks in 2023.
The age-old adage “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” doesn’t always hold true in cybersecurity. As attackers are increasingly leveraging cloud services to protect sensitive data, their methods are evolving too – and with them, the level of sophisticat…
A recent update from the Wireshark Foundation addresses critical vulnerabilities impacting the widely used network protocol analyzer, potentially exposing users to denial-of-service conditions.
Le fichier TES (pour « titres électroniques sécurisés ») centralise les photographies et empreintes digitales que nous donnons pour faire nos titres d'identité et lutter contre les faux documents. Il n’est censé servir qu’à cela. Pourtant, nous révélons aujourd'hui que la police se sert allègrement dans cette base de données pour identifier des personnes lors de ses enquêtes, en violation du droit. laquadrature.net/2025/11/24/la…
Depuis toujours, le fichier TES est massivement critiqué pour les risques de fuites, d'abus ou de piratage qu'il crée. En centralisant au même endroit les liens entre données biométriques et identité civile de la quasi-totalité de la population, il permet à quiconque y accédant de pouvoir identifier une personne à partir de son visage ou d'une empreinte digitale.
Pendant des années, on nous a promis qu'au grand jamais le TES ne pourrait être utilisé pour identifier des personnes et qu’il y avait suffisamment de garanties pour éviter les abus. Nous venons de transmettre à la CNIL des preuves démontrant pourtant que ce risque s’est bel et bien concrétisé.
La police judiciaire ne dispose d’aucun accès direct au TES sauf dans les cas de terrorisme. Pourtant elle contourne cet interdit en exigeant, via des réquisitions judiciaires, que les administrations chargées de la fabrication et de la délivrance des titres leur transmettent les informations du TES. Elle s'arroge ainsi le pouvoir d'identifier toute personne, à partir de ses données biométriques, ce qui lui est normalement interdit.
Aussi bien l’ANTS qui gère la partie informatique que les agents des préfectures qui instruisent les dossiers transmettent ainsi des photographies et empreintes à des policiers. Ceux-ci peuvent ensuite comparer la photo du visage à d’autres images, notamment de vidéosurveillance, pour confirmer ou infirmer leurs soupçons sur l’identité d’une personne.
Cette pratique d’identification s’est développée et a été tolérée pendant des années. Pourtant, elle est totalement contraire à l’esprit du TES et aux positions du Conseil constitutionnel, du Conseil d’État et de la CNIL. Nous demandons donc que le ministère de l’Intérieur rende des comptes et soit sanctionné.
Cet exemple n’est malheureusement qu’un seul symptôme du développement tentaculaire du fichage aujourd’hui en France et de l’augmentation inouïe des moyens de collecte et d’accès aux informations sur la population. Votre soutien pour combattre ce système nous est précieux, alors si vous le pouvez, n’hésitez pas à faire un don ! laquadrature.net/donner/
C'EST PAS DE
L'IA
Quand on entend parler d'intelligence artificielle, c'est l'histoire d'un mythe moderne qui nous est racontée. Celui d'une IA miraculeuse qui doit sauver le monde, ou d'une IA douée de volonté qui voudrait le détruire.
Les leçons de la dernière grande guerre ont été oubliées : **il est toujours dangereux d'accepter la création d'un fichier, et encore plus d'accepter d'y être inscrit** et maintenant que le traitement des fichiers peut être automatisé c'est encore plus vrai
Quand on constate en #France les mêmes pratiques que dans les #USA de M. #Trump , on peut dire qu'on a un (très) sérieux problème :
> « US states give some federal agencies unlimited access to their drivers license records - and now these agencies may be using them for facial recognition, disregarding laws and human rights »
US states give some federal agencies unlimited access to their drivers license records - and now these agencies may be using them for facial recognition, disregarding laws and human rights.
A group of Democratic lawmakers asked governors in California, Colorado, and other states to block ICE from accessing their residents’ driver’s license data without their knowledge.
📝 Read this fantastic op-ed by our very own @itxaso about the "sweeping rewrite of the EU’s core digital protections" in the #DigitalOmnibus proposals presented by the European Commission last week.
🚨 Itxaso touches on which of our #DigitalRights are under threat and what happens to our lives if they fall - including implications for how we access healthcare, apply for a job, seek housing, or move through public space ⤵️
We @edri wrote a very short op-ed walking through what the #DigitalOmnibus (in terms of both substance and process) means for people’s everyday digital life (and thus rights) and why the moment deserves attention. context.news/digital-rights/op…
Giovedì 18 dicembre torniamo con il Logout di TWC Roma, il ritrovo per tech workers che vogliono incontrarsi dopo lavoro: un'occasione per socializzare, conoscersi, parlare del nostro lavoro e come organizzarci nei prossimi mesi!
Ci vediamo giovedì 18 dicembre, alle 18.30, da Sweet Bunch al Pigneto!
Sezione romana di @twcita. Uno spazio per discussioni di rilevanza locale tra tech worker. Pure er posto giusto pe dasse na punta ogni tanto ;) Info & Regolamento: https://t.me/twcitagruppo/80268
Mercredi 26 novembre - Faire face à la fascisation des médias
Cette semaine, nous recevons Soizic Pénicaud, chercheuse indépendante, militante féministe et pour l'accès aux droits, cofondatrice de l'ODAP et Clément Pouré, journaliste indépendant. Nous discuterons du travail de journalisme et de son articulation avec les luttes militantes, dans un contexte d’extrême droitisation de la sphère médiatique.
Rendez-vous le 26/11 à 18h30 sur Twitch, Peertube et Youtube !
J'espère qu'ils ne vont pas faire comme la plus part qui date cela de Trump ou de Macron alors que ces glissements ont commencé doucement dés 2002 au moins, puis se sont accélérés après que ce soit par Sarkozy, Valls Hollande , Macron mais aussi les Médias de masse , même publiques, qui ont imposé des thèmes d'extrême droite comme se les posent les extrêmes droites.
Live du vendredi 21/11 - Sommes-nous à l'heure du technofascisme ?
Cette semaine, pour notre premier live, nous avons reçu @nastasiahadjadji, journaliste et co-autrice du livre Apocalypse Nerds, comment les technofascistes ont pris le pouvoir, aux éditions Divergences. Pour voir la rediffusion du live, rendez vous sur notre chaîne Peertube et Youtube ! video.lqdn.fr/w/eJoXfAgCgiTg5L…
C'EST PAS DE
L'IA
Quand on entend parler d'intelligence artificielle, c'est l'histoire d'un mythe moderne qui nous est racontée. Celui d'une IA miraculeuse qui doit sauver le monde, ou d'une IA douée de volonté qui voudrait le détruire.
Nel sottobosco digitale di Telegram, dove l’anonimato e la crittografia offrono un rifugio apparentemente sicuro, si annidano comunità criminali sempre
Il fatto che l'FBI tratti la a partecipazione civica come una minaccia terroristica fa capire il profondo disprezzo del regime di Trump anche per le più elementari libertà democratiche.
I documenti sono stati ottenuti da Property of the People , un'organizzazione governativa senza scopo di lucro per la trasparenza, tramite richieste di documenti pubblici.
Digital Omnibus – Ecco una prima analisi giuridica del suo impatto regolatorio, a cura dei legali di NOYB
Questa settimana è uscito il “Digital Omnibus”. noyb sta attualmente lavorando a un’analisi scritta approfondita che speriamo di pubblicare nei prossimi giorni. In anteprima, abbiamo riunito in un video i membri del team che hanno lavorato sui vari aspetti della proposta Omnibus della Commissione Europea, per approfondire argomenti selezionati (la nuova definizione di dati personali, la nuova esenzione per la ricerca, le limitazioni alle norme sulla trasparenza e le nuove regole sull’accesso alle apparecchiature terminali).
noyb (None of Your Business), l’organizzazione che si batte per il rispetto della protezione dei dati personali, già resa illustre dalle numerose sentenze che le hanno dato ragione, solleva un forte allarme riguardo al Digital Omnibus, descrivendolo come un potenziale “più grande rollback dei diritti fondamentali digitali nella storia dell’UE”. A tal fine ha presentato un video estremamente interessante che riunisce i membri del team che hanno lavorato sui vari aspetti della proposta Omnibus della Commissione Europea, per approfondire argomenti selezionati (la nuova definizione di dati personali, la nuova esenzione per la ricerca, le limitazioni alle norme sulla trasparenza e le nuove regole sull’accesso alle apparecchiature terminali).
Questo post verrà ripubblicato nella comunità Lemmy @[url=https://feddit.it/c/privacypride]privacypride@feddit.it[/url]
Questo è il video pubblicato sul sito di NOYB, mentre di seguito pubblicheremo un riassunto dei diversi temi sollevati
Le principali Preoccupazioni rispetto ai Contenuti del “Digital Omnibus”
Le modifiche proposte indebolirebbero significativamente le tutele previste dal GDPR:
1. Ridefinizione del “Dato Personale”
La modifica proposta andrebbe a ridefinire la nozione stessa di “dato personale” in modo da escludere dalla protezione del GDPR interi settori o tipi di dati. Se i dati utilizzati per il tracciamento online o per l’ecosistema della pubblicità programmatica (che si basa su ID univoci e pseudonimi) venissero esclusi dall’ambito del GDPR, intere industrie di data broker potrebbero operare fuori dalle attuali regole di protezione dei dati.
2. Deroghe e Favoritismi per l’Intelligenza Artificiale (AI)
Verrebbe proposta l’introduzione di disposizioni che favoriscono l’utilizzo dei dati per l’addestramento e l’operatività dei sistemi di Intelligenza Artificiale (IA).
Invece di applicare le stesse regole a tutte le tecnologie. Ampliando, ad esempio, la nozione di “interesse legittimo” per le finalità di addestramento dei sistemi di AI, si creerebbe un regime di favore per l’AI, in una sorta di “Neutralità Tecnologica Inversa”.
Le proposte consentiranno, o almeno qusto è il timore di NOYB una forma di auto-classificazione o auto-declassificazione dei sistemi di AI, eliminando trasparenza e accountability (responsabilità).
3. Indebolimento del Consenso e del Tracciamento
La modifica proposta potrebbe spostare l’Europa da un sistema di opt-in (dove il consenso è richiesto prima di tracciare) a qualcosa di più vicino a un opt-out (dove l’utente deve attivamente rifiutare per fermare il tracciamento). Questo ridurrebbe la sovranità decisionale dell’utente sui propri dati, rendendo molto più difficile per i cittadini europei bloccare il tracciamento online.
4. Limitazioni sui Diritti degli Interessati e sulla Compliance
Con le modifiche proposte si determinerebbe una potenziale introduzione di una nuova soglia per la segnalazione di violazioni dei dati personali e possibili deroghe ai diritti degli interessati (come il diritto di accesso o opposizione). Limitazioni come queste indebolirebbero le protezioni fondamentali per le persone e rappresenterebbero una sfida significativa per i professionisti della protezione dei dati (come i DPO), che dovrebbero aggiornare in modo massivo policy e procedure.
5. Integrazione con l’EU Business Wallet
La previsione di un’integrazione del Digital Omnibus con il futuro lancio dell’EU Business Wallet, modellato sull’EU Digital Identity Wallet per i cittadini, con l’applicazione di nuovi principi e tempistiche “irrealistiche” solleva dubbi sulla fattibilità e sulla sicurezza, soprattutto per i professionisti della cybersecurity, a causa dell’impatto sulla superficie di attacco dei dispositivi personali.
Il Contesto: Competitività vs. Tutela
Il Digital Omnibus è presentato dalla Commissione come uno sforzo per armonizzare e semplificare le attuali regole digitali dell’UE, con l’obiettivo dichiarato di migliorare la competitività delle imprese europee nell’era digitale e dell’AI. Tuttavia le analisi di NOYB mostrano come questo tentativo di semplificazione e impulso all’innovazione venga fatto a costo di compromettere le protezioni fondamentali stabilite dal GDPR, in particolare a causa di due fattori:
Pressioni Geopolitiche: le pressioni da parte di potenze extra-UE (come gli USA) rischiano di compromettere la sovranità tecnologica europea.
Bilanciamento a Rischio: il tentativo di operare in un contesto “AI-driven” rischia di sacrificare i principi di trasparenza, equità, responsabilità e i diritti degli interessati sull’altare dell’innovazione.
Azioni Suggerite dai legali di NOYB
Per le aziende e i professionisti della compliance (DPO e addetti ai lavori), l’analisi suggerisce una preparazione proattiva in vista di questi probabili stravolgimenti normativi:
Revisione delle policy e dei processi interni di trattamento dei dati.
Valutazione degli impatti specifici per le attività basate sull’Intelligenza Artificiale.
Formazione e sensibilizzazione del personale.
La conclusione è quindi drammatica; le modifiche del Digital Omnibus rappresentano una minaccia diretta ai principi cardine del GDPR e alla protezione dei dati dei cittadini europei.
Rümeysa Öztürk has been facing deportation for 241 days for co-writing an op-ed the government didn’t like. Read on for more about the federal government targeting noncitizen journalists for what they write, say and think.
Journalist-hating president kisses up to journalist-killing crown prince
President Donald Trump shamefully welcomed Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to the White House this week. He brushed aside questions about Crown Prince Mohammed’s role in the gruesome 2018 murder of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi, commenting that “things happen” and “You don’t have to embarrass our guest by asking a question like that.”
Freedom of the Press foundation (FPF) Director of Advocacy Seth Stern remarked:
“Somehow calling a female reporter ‘piggy’ was only the second-most offensive anti-press utterance to come out of the president’s mouth in recent days. And somehow Biden’s infamous fist bump is now only the second-most disgusting public display of flattery by a U.S. president to journalist-murderer Mohammed bin Salman.”
DHS targets journalists for speaking out about Gaza
Texas journalist Ya’akub Ira Vijandre and British journalist and commentator Sami Hamdi are the two latest examples of the Department of Homeland Security targeting journalists.
Hamdi self-deported to England after 18 days enduring inhumane conditions in Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody. Vijandre, a Filipino American Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals recipient who has lived in the U.S. since 2021, remains in custody as he awaits deportation proceedings.
Hamdi and his wife, Soumaya, joined us for an online event this week alongside attorneys and friends of both Hamdi and Vijandre. As Hamdi said, “If the American public finds out the realities of what’s happening, ICE will be dismantled in an instant.”
Prosecutors in Kentucky have finally dropped charges against journalist Madeline Fening, who was arrested while covering a July protest on the Roebling Bridge for CityBeat.
But, as Stern wrote in an op-ed for CityBeat, the damage is already done. Kenton County drew condemnation from civil liberties advocates across the country and sacrificed any credibility it had when it came respecting First Amendment rights — and all to recover a combined grand total of $50 from Fening and her colleague, Lucas Griffith.
You’ve probably seen the inflatable frogs, the dance parties, the naked bike ride. Maybe you’ve also seen the darker images: a federal officer aiming a weapon at protesters, or federal agents hurling tear gas and flash bangs into peaceful demonstrations at a Portland, Oregon, immigration facility.
FPF Senior Adviser Caitlin Vogus writes about how journalists in Portland have been attacked for bringing images like these to the world.
A judicial order won by Chicago area journalists that limited protest policing tactics by federal law enforcement was put on hold this week, with a federal appellate court calling the order overbroad.
As Stern told FPF’s U.S. Press Freedom Tracker, “It is difficult to understand how it is overbroad to ‘enjoin all law enforcement officers within the Executive Branch’ when the president, who last I checked runs the executive branch, expressly demands that those under him brutalize, censor and arrest activists and journalists who interfere with their narrative — the exact conduct restricted by the injunction.”
Immigration agents claim routine reporting violates federal law
Independent news outlet Status Coup reported Wednesday that federal immigration agents threatened its reporter, Jon Farina, with arrest for following and filming them, despite well-established First Amendment protections.
Stern said in a statement, “It looks like these officers believe transparency itself is obstructive to their operations, which is a pretty good indicator that their operations are in need of obstruction. The First Amendment is intended to obstruct government abuses. … If they’re too thin-skinned for the public scrutiny that comes with being a part of that, they can go find a job that doesn’t involve abducting people for an authoritarian regime.”
The secrecy surrounding the Trump’s immigration agenda (NPR). FPF’s Daniel Ellsberg Chair on Government Secrecy joined NPR’s “1A” to talk about the shroud of secrecy at virtually every level of the immigration system.
Will Trump destroy the BBC? (Unherd). “So I presume by the name of your organization that you’re not very keen on sitting presidents suing news organizations.” That’s correct! Listen to our interview with Unherd about Trump’s lawsuit threat against BBC.
The SLAPP Back Initiative(First Amendment Watch). Congratulations to First Amendment Watch at New York University for launching the first database in the U.S. documenting alleged strategic lawsuits against public participation.
Ich bin noch ohne Internet aufgewachsen, und mein Vater hat immer versucht, mich mit Pornos zu versorgen, und wollte überhaupt nicht begreifen, daß ich nicht auf Riesentitten stehe. Glücklicherweise war die Erotika-Sammlung von meinem Hippie-Onkel etwas diverser. Hätte ich damals schon Internet gehabt, hätte wohl niemand versucht, mich zu filtern, und stattdessen hätte ich ständig für meinen Vater nach Monster-Eutern suchen müssen.
Across Europe, a new concept known as chat scanning has entered the public debate. Supporters claim it will protect children from online harm. Chat control is formally part of the Child Sexual Abuse Regulation (CSAR), aimed at combating CSAM (child sexual abuse material). However, many experts, privacy groups, and digital rights advocates warn that it poses a greater risk for everyone who uses a phone, especially young people who message daily.
What is chat scanning?
In simple terms, it is a system that checks your private messages before or as soon as you send them. The app you use would need to scan your texts, photos, or videos and determine whether they seem suspicious. If the scanner thinks something is “unsafe,” it can report the sender, even if the message was completely innocent.
This means the scanning occurs within your phone, not on a server elsewhere. Every typed or uploaded message is checked before it reaches a friend or family member. It is like having a digital security guard watching over your shoulder every time you write something personal.
For digital rights advocates, including the Pirate Party, this raises a serious concern: privacy is not something that can be switched on and off. Once a system is built to monitor everyone’s conversations, it becomes a permanent gateway to surveillance. It does not take much for such tools to be expanded, misused, or accessed by actors who do not have the public’s interest at heart.
Why Chat Control Is a Real Threat
Chat control systems are not theoretical risks. Automated scanners genuinely make mistakes. They often cannot understand teenage slang, humour, or personal images. A tool meant to protect vulnerable users can easily turn into one that falsely accuses innocent people. Meanwhile, determined bad actors can simply switch to apps that do not follow these rules, while ordinary citizens remain under constant monitoring.
This approach also weakens secure communication. End-to-end encryption is designed to protect everyone from hackers, identity theft, and even misuse of state power. Scanning messages before they are encrypted breaks that protection. Instead of keeping society safe, it exposes activists, families, journalists, and children to new dangers.
The Ripple Effect on Democracy
If chat controls become law with a full majority, the long-term consequences could spread slowly but deeply. The ripple effect would impact multiple pillars of democracy.
Privacy Erosion
What begins as limited scanning to target harmful content can gradually expand to include most users. When every message is subject to scrutiny, personal privacy is the first casualty.
Overwhelmed Law Enforcement
A flood of false positives would strain police resources. German experts who reviewed the proposal warned that law enforcement would be unable to handle the volume of inaccurate reports. This waste of time and energy increases the risk of people being wrongly investigated or prosecuted, ultimately making the public less safe.
Chilling of Free Expression
Journalists, activists, and vulnerable groups may start to self-censor because they no longer trust their communication channels. When private conversations feel monitored, open dialogue becomes rare.
Decline in Civic Participation
As trust in institutions weakens, people may disengage from democratic processes. Press freedom declines, and political debate becomes less open.
Shift in Social Norms
Over time, society may begin to accept the idea that monitoring private digital spaces is normal. Such a shift can alter the social contract itself, making surveillance an everyday expectation rather than an exception.
This is how a policy introduced in the name of protection can gradually erode the foundations of democracy.
Are there safer alternatives?
There are better ways to keep communities safe. Targeted investigations, stronger reporting channels, improved child protection services, and investment in digital literacy can genuinely support vulnerable groups without breaking the fundamental right to private communication.
Europe should not accept a future where every phone becomes a checkpoint. Safety should be built on rights, not surveillance. Protecting children and protecting privacy are not opposing goals. With smart policy and responsible technology, the EU can and must do both.
C’è una certa quiete, quasi rassicurante, quando apriamo un installer, nel vedere quella piccola finestra di dialogo di Windows che certifica la validità
For years, APT24, a sophisticated cyber espionage group linked to China's People's Republic, has been quietly crafting targeted attacks against key players across global industries.
Technofascisme. Ce mot n'est plus une hypothèse, c'est un phénomène politique qui se cristallise aujourd'hui aux États-Unis et commence déjà à infuser dans le monde. Mick Levy, voix off : Pourquoi…
Dans le projet de loi de financement de la sécurité sociale (PLFSS) 2026, le gouvernement veut renforcer l’usage du Dossier Médical Partagé (DMP), en sanctionnant les professionel·les de santé qui ne l'utiliseraient pas et en rendant sa consultation obligatoire avant certaines prescriptions. laquadrature.net/2025/11/21/le…
L’article 31 du projet de loi de financement de la sécurité sociale (PLFSS) pour 2026 renforce l’obligation pour les professionnel·les de santé de reporter les données de santé de leurs patient·es dans leur Dossier Médical Partagé (DMP), et introduit…
Nous le disions déjà en 2022 : Améliorer le suivi médical et l'accès des patient·es à leurs documents de santé ? Oui ! Le faire au mépris de leur consentement et sans prendre en compte les spécificité de chacun·e, en particulier en lien avec les discriminations en santé ? Non !
La Quadrature appelle à supprimer l'article 31 du PLFSS, pour lutter contre la destruction du système de santé, et son remplacement par les technosolutions d'un gouvernement accros aux Big Data et à l'IA.
Qui gère ces données ? Ne serait-ce pas ce qui a été confié à Microsoft ? Il y a quelques années on pouvait signaler sur une plate forme des caisses d'assurance maladie et mutuelles qu'on refusait que nos données soient sur un tel système. Finalement comme tout le reste dans cer état pourri on fait comme si cela n'avait jamais existé.
on attend avec impatience que quelqu'un, mais genre n'importe qui, soit sanctionné pour les fuites de données quotidiennes.
déjà, se faire pirater identité, rib, adresse, ... c'est pas spécialement rigolo et les responsables ne risquent rien, mais s'agissant de données de santé, ça va être la fête aux hackers..
tiens, quand est-ce que la possession d'une adresse e-mail et la consultation de la boite mail associée est devenue obligatoire au fait ? (Rapport au fait que l'article rappelle que s'opposer au DMP demandait de répondre à un email reçu).
Giovedì 18 dicembre torniamo con il Logout di TWC Roma, il ritrovo per tech workers che vogliono incontrarsi dopo lavoro: un'occasione per socializzare, conoscersi, parlare del nostro lavoro e come organizzarci nei prossimi mesi!
Ci vediamo giovedì 18 dicembre, alle 18.30, da Sweet Bunch al Pigneto!
Sezione romana di @twcita. Uno spazio per discussioni di rilevanza locale tra tech worker. Pure er posto giusto pe dasse na punta ogni tanto ;) Info & Regolamento: https://t.me/twcitagruppo/80268
Independent news outlet Status Coup reported yesterday that federal immigration agents threatened its reporter, Jon Farina, with arrest for following and filming them, despite well-established First Amendment protections for newsgathering and, specifically, for recording law enforcement.
Border Patrol officers cited a federal statute barring impeding or interference with law enforcement operations, which is entirely inapplicable to Farina filming from a distance. It’s the latest in a series of worrying incidents where politicians and federal agents claim that routine reporting on immigration enforcement is somehow illegal.
Freedom of the Press Foundation’s Director of Advocacy Seth Stern said:
“Americans have a constitutional right to record law enforcement doing their jobs in public and are fully entitled to follow police in order to exercise that right. That right is by no means exclusive to reporters, but it’s especially egregious for law enforcement officers not to recognize that journalists are allowed to document what they’re up to.
“Video of the incident makes clear that the reporters were not in any way obstructing or impeding officers in violation of federal law. They were recording from a distance. It looks like these officers believe transparency itself is obstructive to their operations, which is a pretty good indicator that their operations are in need of obstruction. We’ve repeatedly seen video footage expose misconduct and lies by federal agents. The First Amendment is intended to obstruct government abuses.
“Immigration officers are placing themselves at the center of a major national controversy. Their colleagues have killed and injured people, and held them in inhumane dungeons. If they’re too thin-skinned for the public scrutiny that comes with being a part of that, they can go find a job that doesn’t involve abducting people for an authoritarian regime.”
Please contact us if you would like further comment.
Giovedì 18 dicembre torniamo con il Logout di TWC Roma, il ritrovo per tech workers che vogliono incontrarsi dopo lavoro: un'occasione per socializzare, conoscersi, parlare del nostro lavoro e come organizzarci nei prossimi mesi!
Ci vediamo giovedì 18 dicembre, alle 18.30, da Sweet Bunch al Pigneto!
Arsène Ω🔻🌐🏳️🌈
in reply to La Quadrature du Net • • •Alexan Vorritold
in reply to La Quadrature du Net • • •